The only good thing to come out of this is that I do t have to spend my steel on Bourgogne when I can get a super-Bourgogne in a few patches time. Good times…
I got as high as 350m. They've chipped away at it steadily since. if they think I'm going to spend real money on credits they're high as fuck. about done anyway
Ah yes, the Yamato, a historical ship and the prime apex of battleship development throughout history, being surpassed by Satsuma, a paper design completely fabricated by WG.
Well there is Shikishima in the game, Super-Yamato guns on a Yamato, Satsuma is pretty much a Super-Yamato(A-150) design with 1 more turret. A ship based on a design that was supposed to be the answer to the enemy battleships countering Yamato. Of course it should be stronger then Yamato.
@@danh7411 Design work on the A-150s began after the preceding Yamato class in 1938-1939 and was mostly finished by early 1941, when the Japanese began focusing on aircraft carriers and other smaller warships in preparation for the coming conflict. No A-150 would ever be laid down, and many details of the class' design were destroyed near the end of the war.-Wikipedia And 1 more thing:"Early conceptions for what would become the A-150 battleships called for eight or nine 51-centimeter guns in double or triple turrets, as the successful construction of a 48-centimeter (18.9 in) gun in 1920-1921 made the Japanese confident that such a large weapon could be built." So Satsuma is not entirely fabricated by WG...
100% played a match last night in my Seattle... each team had 4 super ships and 4 Xs. I was 1 of 2 tier tier 9s. Between the United States and a Annapolis I couldn't do much
Until one of us buys them out and fires a bunch of them we will have to put up with this. You would think they would listen to all the ideas that might make them a lot of money, but they don't.
The United States was a late 40's design, it was the smallest carrier than could handle the planes needed for the atomic bombs of the time. It would have approached the Forrestal in size, but the Chair Force dangled the shiny in front of Congress that their strategic bombers could solve all the wars from the skies with atomic bombs. (Yes, Congress has always been stupid). Then Korea happened and the Air Force couldn't win the war all by themselves.
I sense some resentment of the US Air Force in you sonny. 1950s US did not have missles capable of hitting Moscow: FACT Strategic Air Command ( SAC) was the first and last line of defense against Russian aggression: FACT No other branch could hit Moscow within two hours and kept the Russians from launching thier nukes at the US, keeping your butt safe enough to write this ridiculous comment: FACT
Sounds about right, a branch gets its hands on a shiny new toy and thinks everything else is completely worthless only to be proven wrong with the next conflict.
It probably would have made a lot more sense if they had gone with an angle decked Essex or Midway carrier rather than the USS United States. That was really the next generation. The USS United States was a one off design that was going to only have aircraft for nuclear attacks. The idea is that it would have been defended by Midway class carriers for conventional attacks. I would have picked the USS Antietam, an Essex class carrier, which was the first US angled deck carrier.
USS United States was actually a late 40s design, hence the lack of nuclear power. The intent was to carry extra-large, long-range bombers, to give the Navy a piece of the Air Force's strategic nuclear strike mission. This was at the height of Navy-Air Force tensions, after remarks by the Secretary of the Air Force claiming there was no longer a need for the Navy. See "Revolt of the Admirals". The USN strategic air strike mission was scaled back, but existed circa 1953-64 in the form of nuclear-armed, relatively large aircraft on supercarriers, such as the AJ Savage (as seen in-game) and A3D Skywarrior.
I doubt the Superships will be able to curb the credit earning of the old timers and by providing even more further reaching over matching shells , especially now that they can be more accurate ( BB ) or be machine gun it ( Cruisers , Soviet DD ) there is even more incentive for back lane pacing and not forwarding , great WG you just encouraging even more camping, even more passive game play and thus even less active and proactive team play
Translation of the credit situation for tier 11 ships: 'These are a way to force you to buy more credits. these are pay to play ships, and in no way will their use be "carefully planned", it will just be exclusive to those very very experienced players who have built up a lot of credits to burn, or people willing to buy them.'
you actually get a credit and xp boost if you do damage to a ship that's higher tier than you, so a T9 doing a lot of damage to Super ships will get the same proportional boost to it's income that a T8 gets when it mauls a T10
@@TheGuardianofAzarath ye but those ships are now able to overmatch pretty much all tier x cruisers so the only ships that will be getting to farm are ones in smoke or behind an island. My Des Moines got completely deleted last night bc a DD kept me Perma spotted and sat just outside my radar. Can't make a move these days without something spotting for you.
Superships are a credit dump *now.* Tier X used to serve that purpose until they decided to add permanent camos for them. I expect they will soon add those to Superships; right before they introduce Tier XII.
Non-permanent credit-boosting camos, however, allow you to play these monsters endlessly. As Mountbatten states, many of us are sitting on bajillions of credits AND bazillions of camos. Look for a glut of these ships incoming to a game near you soon! And they won't go away. Having played the Super CVs ... yeah ... game-breaking content right there as they can reach the corners of the map in 30 seconds, so 'break' tactics by negating them.
Warships depends on seal clubbing through MM. But they crossed the line with Super ships and now t9/t10 random is wrecked, completely ruined and out of WG ability to balance and control. It was bad with CV's but subs and super ships killed it. People will refuse to play t9/t10 random. Especially t9 because service costs with the signal flag reduction removed from the game makes it not worth the effort. I suspect there will be a small pool of unhappy super ship owners waiting a long time to get into a random battle and even when they get in one it will be populated by OP t10 ships looking to troll.
@@waltermelyon4300 Correct! Had WG wanted Tier XI, fair enough. However, they would have had to have scaled the power and the popularity of the ships to balance MM. unfortunately, such is the power of some of these Super Ships that they’ll be too attractive to the masses. I have sooooo many Premiums and so many credits that I could easily run the Eagle for six months. Tier VIII, maybe?
@@britinmadrid true, and as the percent of the player base of people like you is comically small... They just didn't think this through, didn't consider the majority of players who will avoid T9/T10 random because what incentive is there to get bullied by T11? Like I said the easy seal clubbing days at high tier is over when the seals refuse to play. It's going to be a brutal OP dumpster fire.
I totally remember a time playing a T10 was a treat because you were expecting to run a deficit in credit earning. Nowadays it's easy to make back the credits, I dont know why, flags, camo? Back in the day you almost required T10 prem purchased camo to play your T10 ships because you would run a huge risk of losing money if they didnt have the camo. Reminds me of this T11, costing more than T10...
Good morning all. More junk for me to collect? Wish I could play. I have chronic pain and inflamed arthritis, so i have 8 percocets a day. I appreciate these videos a lot.
What about commanders for Superships? If they are added to the tech tree does that mean I need ANOTHER 21 point captain? FFS at least before I could move Lutyens between Schlieffen and Hannover for no cost!
hate the direction this game is going.. the meta is awful. BB's jsut stay more and more back, cruisers have to go close to shoot and therefore tank and die so then dd's have no support.. it sucks
Can’t tell you what the multipliers are big I know from experience that T9 in a super ship game is extremely painful, you can no longer run to T9 to avoid the horrible MM of T8
instead of superships how bout have these tier 10 players take part in some really fun gamemodes like Arms Race/brawls/derigable derby/tierX operations that actually cost some fair bit credits so that way tier 10 players can have fun and tier 8-9 players can have higher chances of being top tier and have something to look forward to at the end of the grind.
Not gonna lie, i might actually pick up the Hornet. Another tier 8 American Carrier to add to my collection. The real question is: Coal? Steel? Doubloons? Money?
Check out ReimuBakarei's review of Hornet before you do. He is an open CV main and very good in them. I'm not a CV play by any standards, but worth checking his review before spending any money.
Lowest tier that can see superships is tier 9, same as it is now. Unless a div does the horrible move of having a tier 8 queue in a div with tier 9, then they get completely fucked.
I'm curious of what a japanese super cruiser would look like.. I mean we already have Yoshino but she doesn't quite fit into this as she is more of a counterpart to the Alaska or Puerto Rico. Will it be a super Zao with 12 280mm guns or something like this? Or maybe just a variant of Zao with way more armour? We will see....
@@treeherder42 Well your main goal with Zao is NOT to absorb enemy shells with armour but instead use ur stealth and agility to not get hit at all... I've had a match yesterday with 2.5 million pot damage and half my Zao was still there.. So more survivability is IMHO not the best way for a "super-Zao"
I'm thinking that maybe WG might make a whole new section to the tech tree [T11-20] - which would be based on the 2nd half of the 20th century - just like T1-10 is based on the first half of the 20th century. who else see's this happening?
With how they are still desperately trying to fit subs into the game, I wouldn’t be surprised if they decided to go through with such a ridiculous idea.
Where is Yorktown? Yorktown should be coming out when hornet would be? Also this is perfect timing because Bree 80th anniversary of the Doolittle raid will start on April 18, 1942
All this new "crap" and I still can't play my Groningen for stars in Naval Battles! Support told me that when they introduce tiers 1-10 in that Nation "then" Groningen would be able to participate in Naval Battles. Welp now they've got tiers 1-10 Italian DDs and are pushing through many "other" items so... When the FK are they going to "simply activate" an already existing slot/box in the Naval battles screen for my "Premium-ship" Groningen. Friesland, Groningen's "exact" duplicate can participate so WTF WOW????? Ironically those two acronyms are completely interchangeable!
So they're breaking the economy even more. There is no reason for someone to lose credit by design and again. Once again they're going to punish players who or just starting out because some players that been here a while have a lot of credits.
>There is no reason for someone to lose credit by design WG already do that with tier 9 and 10 for 10 years already, their reason being "We want more players at lower tiers"
Are we going to lose our advanced captains again? If they do that to me again I'm freaking done with this game man I have blood sweat and tears in my advanced captains and I don't want to go through it all again I mean the last trip was what close to 2 million Captain points just to get his back tow they were before they killed them off I'm just not gonna do it again no no no not gonna do it again
quick question ( or 21) about the dockyard, they said that you get 250 steel if you paid but completed the part, so by default if you just pay the 3 phases needed to get the ship do you still get steel for completing those? i need still and have some spart doublon so i aim to take the starter pack for 8k doub, that should give me steel too at the same time right?
I've been playing since day one and I only have 88 million credits. I don't think that's gonna be close enough to continue with any of this is it? I still have New Jersey unless the new year that tune where you don't get credits anymore and that oh boy that that would be so so so bad. There's also Nelson Nelson is a weird creature though but you didn't actually get some pretty good credits with that guy Robert Missouri still remains the credit King and by God I'm gonna play the crap out of her to build things up it's always find a way to stop me from doing it was they probably will
very good question... althought i am pretty sure that they can`t. I have played many matches against T11 ships (thats just what they are...) And never saw T8`s. Needless to say but they are disguistingly powerful, as a T9 you can barely scratch any of them.
The Clan battles are about to be ruined and I've refused to play anymore, I'm excited about Atlantico and its secondary potential but other than that I'm not gonna enjoy any of this shit
they need to add ocean life to game whales dolphins etc. and fires on land ao if your shells hit an island with trees a forrest fire starts, we need kamikaze planes in game for more realistic, and bring out more BB like the Uss Utah, Wisconsin, or the most decorated Battleship Uss New Jersey bring them into the game finally bring back CV from 5,7,9, bring back to game.
They've repeatedly stated that kamikaze aircraft will not be a thing in the game. Tho they said that about TXs for sale, Yammy's guns being the biggest guns in the game and most annoyingly, "subs will never be a part of our game".
The game gets boring and more boring as you get to T10, now I suspect if anyone would play this long enough to get XI ship. At least I don't have such patience.
Nope ... won't fall for that. When I finally researched my first Tier X ship I thought it would be fun to play with that....but it wasn't . I've had (and still have) infinitely more fun at Tier VI / VII ,,,,
So, they are adding broken content, 40% of which are CV's, to rebalance the game economy. They think that will make veteran players want to play the game more???????
Thx wargaming for nothing again ^^ Subs suck, CVs suck (especially NachimOP and FDR) and the spotting damn. The game is full of 1000000Torps all the time which is damn unrealistic. BBS are now obsolete and the game itself is also obsolete.
The only good thing to come out of this is that I do t have to spend my steel on Bourgogne when I can get a super-Bourgogne in a few patches time. Good times…
You don't have to spend the steel but I sure hope your credit bank is as full as can be. :P Since they're not supposed to be cheap to play
Bourgogne gets better MM and earns credits like crazy
@@domidomi917 People who play a lot have hundreds of millions. Personally, I have so many credits I can't even use them.
I got as high as 350m. They've chipped away at it steadily since. if they think I'm going to spend real money on credits they're high as fuck. about done anyway
Tier 10 is already a money sink. Imagine how much money will be lost just for one super ship game.
Would have been better for superships if they were added in to research bureau. The preconditions they want for the ships are already there.
Ah yes, the Yamato, a historical ship and the prime apex of battleship development throughout history, being surpassed by Satsuma, a paper design completely fabricated by WG.
This sort of thing has been happening for years
Well there is Shikishima in the game, Super-Yamato guns on a Yamato, Satsuma is pretty much a Super-Yamato(A-150) design with 1 more turret.
A ship based on a design that was supposed to be the answer to the enemy battleships countering Yamato. Of course it should be stronger then Yamato.
when the Japanese was doing super Yamato project, the A-150?
@@danh7411 Design work on the A-150s began after the preceding Yamato class in 1938-1939 and was mostly finished by early 1941, when the Japanese began focusing on aircraft carriers and other smaller warships in preparation for the coming conflict. No A-150 would ever be laid down, and many details of the class' design were destroyed near the end of the war.-Wikipedia
And 1 more thing:"Early conceptions for what would become the A-150 battleships called for eight or nine 51-centimeter guns in double or triple turrets, as the successful construction of a 48-centimeter (18.9 in) gun in 1920-1921 made the Japanese confident that such a large weapon could be built." So Satsuma is not entirely fabricated by WG...
A pure travesty. Historical real ships getting shafted.
And here I am still wondering what the research bureau is with my 2 tier X ships....
I think super ships suck, especially when you are playing a T9 in a supership/t10 battle. Not fun at times. T9 shouldnt be matched in these battles.
Ya thats what I was gonna say. T9 just became the new painful T8 experience when up tiered.
Console version is +-1. Not sure why they can’t do that
All T9 are good enough to easily play against T11. Tiers after 9 dont even get an additional slot for upgrades
100% played a match last night in my Seattle... each team had 4 super ships and 4 Xs. I was 1 of 2 tier tier 9s. Between the United States and a Annapolis I couldn't do much
@@user-cj5nk8jk4w Tbh Seattle would has a tough time fighting T8's
Can't wait for other super DDs equipped with fucking antiship missiles or homing torpedoes or something ridiculous like that
How about they just don’t make Tier XIs?
We wish XD
Until one of us buys them out and fires a bunch of them we will have to put up with this. You would think they would listen to all the ideas that might make them a lot of money, but they don't.
As a t8 I'm happy to see t11 in game now
@@Stoicismisourgreatestteacher and then get constantly uptiered to T10 cause people don't want to play t9s anymore
@@kevinthechuker1721 makes no difference anyway. T10 always been polluting t8 games. Least this way I'll have less t10 games to deal with.
The United States was a late 40's design, it was the smallest carrier than could handle the planes needed for the atomic bombs of the time. It would have approached the Forrestal in size, but the Chair Force dangled the shiny in front of Congress that their strategic bombers could solve all the wars from the skies with atomic bombs. (Yes, Congress has always been stupid). Then Korea happened and the Air Force couldn't win the war all by themselves.
I sense some resentment of the US Air Force in you sonny.
1950s US did not have missles capable of hitting Moscow: FACT
Strategic Air Command ( SAC) was the first and last line of defense against Russian aggression: FACT
No other branch could hit Moscow within two hours and kept the Russians from launching thier nukes at the US, keeping your butt safe enough to write this ridiculous comment: FACT
Sounds about right, a branch gets its hands on a shiny new toy and thinks everything else is completely worthless only to be proven wrong with the next conflict.
I disagree, USAF could have dropped the bomb ending it but America didnt and chose to go with limited war. Since then America has not won a war.
It probably would have made a lot more sense if they had gone with an angle decked Essex or Midway carrier rather than the USS United States. That was really the next generation. The USS United States was a one off design that was going to only have aircraft for nuclear attacks. The idea is that it would have been defended by Midway class carriers for conventional attacks. I would have picked the USS Antietam, an Essex class carrier, which was the first US angled deck carrier.
@@Poopster4U really? Lol
Update by update, they drive me further and further from wanting to play this game anymore
USS United States was actually a late 40s design, hence the lack of nuclear power. The intent was to carry extra-large, long-range bombers, to give the Navy a piece of the Air Force's strategic nuclear strike mission. This was at the height of Navy-Air Force tensions, after remarks by the Secretary of the Air Force claiming there was no longer a need for the Navy. See "Revolt of the Admirals". The USN strategic air strike mission was scaled back, but existed circa 1953-64 in the form of nuclear-armed, relatively large aircraft on supercarriers, such as the AJ Savage (as seen in-game) and A3D Skywarrior.
Great… just when I finally managed to master Alabama and not get slaughtered by the T-10’s in comes the 11’s.
I doubt the Superships will be able to curb the credit earning of the old timers and by providing even more further reaching over matching shells , especially now that they can be more accurate ( BB ) or be machine gun it ( Cruisers , Soviet DD ) there is even more incentive for back lane pacing and not forwarding , great WG you just encouraging even more camping, even more passive game play and thus even less active and proactive team play
That's cool, I'm barely sitting on 1 million credits at any given time. So I just wait to be extra poor if I ever want to play a tier 11 lol.
Imma get Hornet, United States and Hannover
Next Ships T11 or T12 , Cruiser With Guide Missile, Destroyer, Battleships etc , and for CV use missile AA , Jet With Guide Missile, and many other
Translation of the credit situation for tier 11 ships: 'These are a way to force you to buy more credits. these are pay to play ships, and in no way will their use be "carefully planned", it will just be exclusive to those very very experienced players who have built up a lot of credits to burn, or people willing to buy them.'
you actually get a credit and xp boost if you do damage to a ship that's higher tier than you, so a T9 doing a lot of damage to Super ships will get the same proportional boost to it's income that a T8 gets when it mauls a T10
@@TheGuardianofAzarath ye but those ships are now able to overmatch pretty much all tier x cruisers so the only ships that will be getting to farm are ones in smoke or behind an island. My Des Moines got completely deleted last night bc a DD kept me Perma spotted and sat just outside my radar. Can't make a move these days without something spotting for you.
Superships are a credit dump *now.*
Tier X used to serve that purpose until they decided to add permanent camos for them. I expect they will soon add those to Superships; right before they introduce Tier XII.
Non-permanent credit-boosting camos, however, allow you to play these monsters endlessly. As Mountbatten states, many of us are sitting on bajillions of credits AND bazillions of camos. Look for a glut of these ships incoming to a game near you soon! And they won't go away. Having played the Super CVs ... yeah ... game-breaking content right there as they can reach the corners of the map in 30 seconds, so 'break' tactics by negating them.
Warships depends on seal clubbing through MM. But they crossed the line with Super ships and now t9/t10 random is wrecked, completely ruined and out of WG ability to balance and control. It was bad with CV's but subs and super ships killed it. People will refuse to play t9/t10 random. Especially t9 because service costs with the signal flag reduction removed from the game makes it not worth the effort. I suspect there will be a small pool of unhappy super ship owners waiting a long time to get into a random battle and even when they get in one it will be populated by OP t10 ships looking to troll.
@@waltermelyon4300 Correct! Had WG wanted Tier XI, fair enough. However, they would have had to have scaled the power and the popularity of the ships to balance MM. unfortunately, such is the power of some of these Super Ships that they’ll be too attractive to the masses. I have sooooo many Premiums and so many credits that I could easily run the Eagle for six months. Tier VIII, maybe?
@@britinmadrid true, and as the percent of the player base of people like you is comically small... They just didn't think this through, didn't consider the majority of players who will avoid T9/T10 random because what incentive is there to get bullied by T11? Like I said the easy seal clubbing days at high tier is over when the seals refuse to play. It's going to be a brutal OP dumpster fire.
So.... tier XII will add ship/ship guided missiles, tier XIII missile AA, Tier XIV tactical nukes?
HAHAHA... yes I would like to see Russian Slava class cruiser with its 16 huge anti-ship missiles in game.
@@generaldodo7392 gonna watch it one shot the entire enemy fleet in 20 seconds
Iowa with Katie shells
And for F/A-18 jets, F-14 Tomcats, F-15s for American jets, Russia/Soviet Union Sukhoi Su-25-Su-75 etc.
@@generaldodo7392 and then it gets sunk by a single anti-ship cruise missile, lol
Why are we still here ? Just to suffer? german supercruiser clausewitz probably soon
with these ships and the new super CV's im staying away from higher tier. I have had the fun blown out of me.
On the flip side, it means more Tier 8 ships will be high tier because 9s and 10s will be fighting super ships.
@@chrisaustin9949 good point
We're going to make the cost of playing them so high nobody will want to play them. Great Wargaming logic.
I totally remember a time playing a T10 was a treat because you were expecting to run a deficit in credit earning. Nowadays it's easy to make back the credits, I dont know why, flags, camo?
Back in the day you almost required T10 prem purchased camo to play your T10 ships because you would run a huge risk of losing money if they didnt have the camo.
Reminds me of this T11, costing more than T10...
Where to next? Super-Duper-Ships?
Coming 2023-4
Good morning all. More junk for me to collect? Wish I could play. I have chronic pain and inflamed arthritis, so i have 8 percocets a day. I appreciate these videos a lot.
I’m right there w/ you, hang in there & feel better.
What about commanders for Superships? If they are added to the tech tree does that mean I need ANOTHER 21 point captain? FFS at least before I could move Lutyens between Schlieffen and Hannover for no cost!
They are now tech tree. So yeah. Sad.
I just play more T8 and below. I dont want single supership or spaceship carrier in to my games.
I understand 30 knot Burke is being added a commander.
"31 knot Burke".
So new Super ships - Let them be or Super Target !!
Dude.... The Hornet is Nuts... The Doolittle Bombers Man.....
So Superships are officially Tier 11. I expect these ships can only be get by The best players in the game, but I guess it is now just being tier 11
hate the direction this game is going.. the meta is awful. BB's jsut stay more and more back, cruisers have to go close to shoot and therefore tank and die so then dd's have no support.. it sucks
What is the impact of superships on MM? Are they t10 or 11? What about the multipliers when facing them in a t9?
Can’t tell you what the multipliers are big I know from experience that T9 in a super ship game is extremely painful, you can no longer run to T9 to avoid the horrible MM of T8
@@majestichotwings6974 so whats going to be the new god tier above 4?
Seems like I will not be playing my Tier 9s or 10s for a while.
instead of superships how bout have these tier 10 players take part in some really fun gamemodes like Arms Race/brawls/derigable derby/tierX operations that actually cost some fair bit credits so that way tier 10 players can have fun and tier 8-9 players can have higher chances of being top tier and have something to look forward to at the end of the grind.
Because that would take some effort on the part of WG. Nice idea though.
Not gonna lie, i might actually pick up the Hornet. Another tier 8 American Carrier to add to my collection. The real question is: Coal? Steel? Doubloons? Money?
Money, ohhh the sweet sweet money...
Check out ReimuBakarei's review of Hornet before you do. He is an open CV main and very good in them. I'm not a CV play by any standards, but worth checking his review before spending any money.
@@gallusace6514 Thanks, i shall. Saw notser put up a video about Hornet earlyer today, but we all know how he thinks.
With Tier 11 coming out, what is the tier breakdown for battles after tier 5?
Good question
Lowest tier that can see superships is tier 9, same as it is now. Unless a div does the horrible move of having a tier 8 queue in a div with tier 9, then they get completely fucked.
I'm curious of what a japanese super cruiser would look like.. I mean we already have Yoshino but she doesn't quite fit into this as she is more of a counterpart to the Alaska or Puerto Rico. Will it be a super Zao with 12 280mm guns or something like this? Or maybe just a variant of Zao with way more armour? We will see....
Probably just a Zao with 5K more hp. :D
More hp, more armor, slight reload or damage buff and a 2 shot burst.
Zao is good apart from the total lack of survivability.
@@treeherder42 Well your main goal with Zao is NOT to absorb enemy shells with armour but instead use ur stealth and agility to not get hit at all... I've had a match yesterday with 2.5 million pot damage and half my Zao was still there.. So more survivability is IMHO not the best way for a "super-Zao"
@@treeherder42 The main problem of zao is still the same for years. Firing angles almost as junk as GK.
I'm thinking that maybe WG might make a whole new section to the tech tree [T11-20] - which would be based on the 2nd half of the 20th century - just like T1-10 is based on the first half of the 20th century.
who else see's this happening?
With how they are still desperately trying to fit subs into the game, I wouldn’t be surprised if they decided to go through with such a ridiculous idea.
ah the world of warcraft model..
Where is Yorktown? Yorktown should be coming out when hornet would be? Also this is perfect timing because Bree 80th anniversary of the Doolittle raid will start on April 18, 1942
Haven’t heard much about Yorktown since her initial announcement
All this new "crap" and I still can't play my Groningen for stars in Naval Battles! Support told me that when they introduce tiers 1-10 in that Nation "then" Groningen would be able to participate in Naval Battles. Welp now they've got tiers 1-10 Italian DDs and are pushing through many "other" items so... When the FK are they going to "simply activate" an already existing slot/box in the Naval battles screen for my "Premium-ship" Groningen. Friesland, Groningen's "exact" duplicate can participate so WTF WOW?????
Ironically those two acronyms are completely interchangeable!
So they're breaking the economy even more. There is no reason for someone to lose credit by design and again. Once again they're going to punish players who or just starting out because some players that been here a while have a lot of credits.
>There is no reason for someone to lose credit by design
WG already do that with tier 9 and 10 for 10 years already, their reason being "We want more players at lower tiers"
You need to have the tech tree line AND 3 tier 10 ships. Not one or the other, its both
Are we going to lose our advanced captains again? If they do that to me again I'm freaking done with this game man I have blood sweat and tears in my advanced captains and I don't want to go through it all again I mean the last trip was what close to 2 million Captain points just to get his back tow they were before they killed them off I'm just not gonna do it again no no no not gonna do it again
I was really excited for Hornet, but the reimu and carbine reviews dont give me much hope. WG shafting another historical ship as per usual :(
How are they handling re-setting lines for RB? When you re-set the line do you loose the T-11 ship as well?
No you will keep the T11 when you reset they said that in update article
They won't be part of the reset.
I was thinking about this. What if we could choose between rapid fire and salvo for secondary gunds?
you mean T-XII CV?
Did I hear that correctly do you need to research the line of yamato to get satsuma?
Yes of have 3 lines researched to t10.
@@mike393000 I heard him say that you can research 3 lines or the one line with the perquisites ships
I have 2 million credits atm. So no I won’t be playing any t11 ships anytime soon
makes tier 7 the best tier....fock superships.
Sy those tier 11 ships to expensive for me not selling none my tier 10s. I would have to sell several of my ships. And does not include mod to.
Not related to this vid, but I heard Moskva recently got a big nerf.
They upped its fire duration, apparently.
@@gregoryfolsom7882 - flood duration too.
quick question ( or 21) about the dockyard, they said that you get 250 steel if you paid but completed the part, so by default if you just pay the 3 phases needed to get the ship do you still get steel for completing those? i need still and have some spart doublon so i aim to take the starter pack for 8k doub, that should give me steel too at the same time right?
No, if you buy more than the minimum three to complete the ship, and then grind the surplus phases, you get steel for the surplus phases *only*.
@@gregoryfolsom7882 so if take the 8 phase pack i will only get steel for 5 phases if completed ?
Basically, phases completed in excess of those needed for the ship will earn the steel ... until then, you're still earning the ship.
@@kaollachan correct
I've been playing since day one and I only have 88 million credits. I don't think that's gonna be close enough to continue with any of this is it? I still have New Jersey unless the new year that tune where you don't get credits anymore and that oh boy that that would be so so so bad. There's also Nelson Nelson is a weird creature though but you didn't actually get some pretty good credits with that guy Robert Missouri still remains the credit King and by God I'm gonna play the crap out of her to build things up it's always find a way to stop me from doing it was they probably will
57mil credits for a T11 BB, other classes get cheaper based on size, not sure about CVs coz don't care enough about them to look....
I'm kind of mad that the super carriers are nor named Forrestal and Malta.
Are we getting soloman islands back?
French DDs get farmed to death by these super CVs. Sure, you can hang back all game and farm, but where's the fun?
With T☆ now on the tech tree, will T8 ships face them or will T8 be limited to T10 with only T9 and T10 facing T☆?
very good question... althought i am pretty sure that they can`t. I have played many matches against T11 ships (thats just what they are...) And never saw T8`s. Needless to say but they are disguistingly powerful, as a T9 you can barely scratch any of them.
No comment on brawls being made into another ranked/ randoms mode? Brawls should be 4v4 at maximum...
natural progression? Don't these things jump in displacement by about 30,000 tonnes?
How come we already have a new release when WG did not finish moving out of Russia?
Updates are planned well in advanced. We probably won’t see any delay in updates until 11.4
@@sealordmountbatten wow, that long!
They'll be prepared 6 months to a year in advance.
RIP tier 9
You forgot about hornet!!
No he didnt
Watching you whip a 90 and just full abandon a flank pains me
? I fully commit to the flank I went through, pushed, and we won
Do we know when Mecklenburg is coming yet?
I always read it as T IX...
More steps towards the grave where the game will die. Nice move wg.
The Clan battles are about to be ruined and I've refused to play anymore, I'm excited about Atlantico and its secondary potential but other than that I'm not gonna enjoy any of this shit
where is IJN supercruiser ?
the most shitty event only easter tokens are something useful to gain for
they need to add ocean life to game whales dolphins etc. and fires on land ao if your shells hit an island with trees a forrest fire starts, we need kamikaze planes in game for more realistic, and bring out more BB like the Uss Utah, Wisconsin, or the most decorated Battleship Uss New Jersey bring them into the game finally bring back CV from 5,7,9, bring back to game.
They've repeatedly stated that kamikaze aircraft will not be a thing in the game. Tho they said that about TXs for sale, Yammy's guns being the biggest guns in the game and most annoyingly, "subs will never be a part of our game".
Hmm so for once NA will get update last.
They need to rebalance the game and encourage BB to move on forward as for now the game pretty stale.
BBs aren't even gonna leave spawn with tier 11 DDs wandering about.
@@BlackHearthguard yeah this was confirmed today BB stay even further.
Hornet timestamp for those who are avid history nerds like myself. It wasn't anything substantial.
ruclips.net/video/IJsRkhzLrr8/видео.html
The game gets boring and more boring as you get to T10, now I suspect if anyone would play this long enough to get XI ship. At least I don't have such patience.
Nope ... won't fall for that. When I finally researched my first Tier X ship I thought it would be fun to play with that....but it wasn't . I've had (and still have) infinitely more fun at Tier VI / VII ,,,,
So, they are adding broken content, 40% of which are CV's, to rebalance the game economy. They think that will make veteran players want to play the game more???????
CVs, subs and T11... what joy.
Meh, don't really care, I don't play high tiers any more.
Thx wargaming for nothing again ^^ Subs suck, CVs suck (especially NachimOP and FDR) and the spotting damn. The game is full of 1000000Torps all the time which is damn unrealistic. BBS are now obsolete and the game itself is also obsolete.
CV BAD! NO SUB FOR CV BB ONLY
So it's pay to win
Tier 9 is dead. Fuck tier 11
This game is dying...and I'm not very sad about it.
Hornet is garbage , you will suffer under for 60% of the matches , until they implement preference match making , dont buy this hot garbage /