Do you agree with Mr. Wonderful? Subscribe for more stock reviews! Join the Discord: www.patreon.com/DividendData Follow on Instagram: instagram.com/dividenddata/ Follow On Twitter: twitter.com/dividend_data Subscribe: ruclips.net/channel/UCZ5V5HyAvkFrjsWkANqXscQr
I would take QUAL over OUSA any day. Exp ratio is equal, but QUAL has outperformed OUSA by 10 % points over the last year. QUAL has lower div yield 1.4% vs 2.4% I would expect Kevin to put his out there.
Dividends are great, but to earn wealth from nothing I think I need something more powerful. If the average dividend yield is 4% and my rate of savings is $200 per month, it is going to take me 30 years just to get anywhere. I've decided to mix it up into 4 areas. 1) dividends, 2) Index funds, 3) FundRise (real estate) 4) dreamfire52 (forex copy trading). If I get 4% from dividends 8% from index funds, 10% from fundrise and 30% from dreamfire52, I'll make it in 10 years...
@@glendemarco250 1. Dividends don't stay at 3-4 % forever, they usually grow. Try to pick some companies within this 3-4 % sweet spot with an annual dividend growth rate >6-7%. Indexfunds are extremely overvalued at this point, i would not! maybe some emerging markets that are cheap. Maybe you should focus on getting you savings up, take another job, start a business or something. there are plenty of opportunities. merry christmas from germany.
Great video! My acknowledgement to you for your knowledge on business lesson that helped me understand the market trial with real reason why people get poorer, And How to Avoid this situation
@Colleen BruceYou're welcome, Can share some business tips that helped me, 1. Plan towards it 2. Be minimal on spending 3. Save money wisely towards retirement 4. Then be ready to take a profitable procedure as you venture into the market system, it's a proven way to get richer.
My aunt lives very comfortably off her late husband's royalties in oil... royalties are the way if you belive the investment you are putting money into is going to stay and grow big... which all your investments should have this mentality
“Tamara Diane Hagan " is one I'm quite familiar with, I came across her on an investment webinar.. You can look up with her name online , you will find her website to know more about the service she offer...cheers
Financial investment can be emotionally exhausting/frustrating in a case where inconsistency in trade wins is much. Positive results are guaranteed more if one works with a reliable professional. My most sincere take though!!
I share the same view. Tried to make a start on crypto investment but was almost frustrated out by heavy loses till JOANNA MALIVA LEE was recommended to me. She has been managing my portfolios for a while now and have never faltered
I like Kevin and think he has a strong point when it comes to dividend paying stocks. But his ETF is expensive. If your looking for a dividend ETF I'd look at Vanguard's VIG or Schwab's SCHD. Both have an ER of .06% and have solid track records over a longer period of time.
Finally someone agrees with me. I'm an amateur but I've always seen non-dividend paying shares similar to Ponzi schemes. It's only worth something because someone might be convinced to pay you more for it, because someone might pay them more for it, because someone might pay them more for it too and so on.
I am not really a growth kind of guy, but stocks are not like crypto. Stocks have a business behind them; cash flow, earning, reputation and many more complicated things. Not going to get into them, but stocks have a value behind them. Crypto and Ponzi schemes do not. They are a greater fool theory. The only reason they have value is someone says they do. They do not have cash flow and earning (for the investors, only the founders). They have a reputation, but it’s not a good one like a business. I hope that made sense.
Well if you're just invested in a total fund like VTI/VTSAX or a S&P Fund like VOO/VTIAX then it doesn't matter. If you're someone that's prone to stock-picking and speculation, or you think the Boglehead philosophy is boring, yeah sure go for Dividend Investing. You won't make more money than my VTI/VXUS/BND portfolio though.
@@michaelfenell3602 I agree with what you are saying - stocks represent a real value, unlike something like crypto. However, as a shareholder without dividends you do not really have any way of interacting with or extracting that value. You can access the value if the company is bought, or if it closes, or if it starts providing dividends in the future. But you do not innately have any real connection to the value of the company. A company could be undervalued for years and you would not gain any benefit from it as an investor without dividends, because you only make money by someone else being willing to pay more for your share. If a company with dividends is undervalued, you are getting great yield on your investment and should be happy. Concretely, say that there is a company that consists of a giant safe with one million dollars in cash. You own 1% of the company. With your 1%, you have no way to actually access your 10,000 dollars of cash. The only way you get your 10,000 dollars worth for your shares is if someone else is willing to pay 10,000 dollars for the 1% share.
@@theWebWizrd yeah it does seem like a Ponzi scheme, but i think there’s theoretically a difference. The value is inaccessible only if the “no dividend” is an ironclad rule. I like buffets approach where he essentially says, “we’re happy to give you a dividend as soon as we think the dollar sitting your pocket is worth (net present value) as much or more than a dollar invested with us”. It just so happens they haven’t yet found that moment, but in that case it’s less locked in a safe for all time and more akin to money you entrust to somebody that they will only allow you to withdraw when it is optimal to withdraw. (Of course this is all to distinguish theoretically between no-dividend and a ponzi scheme. In practical terms there’s always a way to get your money out.)
Boy how times have changed. Kevin now owns a lot of crypto and other than potential staking they don’t pay a dividend. He owns fintech companies, and many other tech firms that don’t pay dividends.
@@savvygames5474 but dividend investing is not a negative thing, so why does bias matter? Confirmation bias relates to being bias to one thing and disregarding contradicting information, what contradicting information is there about dividend investing?
@@benyaminmiller5504 Not necessarily. If you are married, which I am, I can withdraw $80,000 a year in qualified dividend income and pay 0 in taxes. After that and on up to nearly $500k in dividends, I only pay the capital gains tax rate of 15%...still better than ordinary job income.
@@iamdavis012686 I was unaware. I haven’t looked into it too deep yet as I’m not even in a bracket yet. Thank you so much foretelling me that it is duly noted.
@@benyaminmiller5504 Happy to fill you in. I really like it as an investing strategy because even if you’re pulling out all of the income it still tends to go up every year as the companies increase their dividends
Kevin O'Leary that guy is absolute beast! Just look how good he predicted and convinced you for sure that Meta stocks already hit it's max bottom and that you should buy at that moment
I trust Buffet more on his approach. If a business is producing high free cash flow, then it can either invest in new projects or runways within the business or pay dividends or do share buybacks. I think what Kevin is missing is that if you have free cash flow per share increasing, this is good news for the investor no matter if it’s directly paid to them through dividend distributions or if it stays reinvested in the company
You say "If it stays reinvested in the company" -- Okay, but then you'd have to keep assessing whether the company is investing in the right ways, in order to keep the stock price increasing. A stable or growing dividend is cash coming directly at you and proving that the company has been doing the right things (to maintain the dividend) and is devoted to maintaining or increasing its dividend.
I'm 58 year old Dividend investor, my wife and I have invested in the S&P500, through my TSP with the government and her fidelity in the 401-k, got a huge payout of 330k from s&p and I invested with a full service broker Mr Hovik Morte, until around 3 years ago our portfolio had increases exponentially through s&p after over 25 years, I plan on the leaving my physical labor job and retiring at 60 and my wife will retire at 58 and live off our burly 2 million dollars in our tax deferred savings, But I'll keep trading constantly after retirement with my broker and spending quality time with my grandkids.
At least you have a well structured plan. Trading the stock market has been a headache for me since I got into it, I placed trades with the help of articles I see online and it's resulted in losses I don't get what I'm doing wrong... how do you understand this stuff?
The stock market is a place to change your life and make tons of money and it can also be a place to lose a whole lot more investing poorly. Making profit doesn't run with luck, it takes skill, expertise and understanding to perfectly execute proper strategies to make passive profit. Such skill and Expertise only come from constant practice from years. So I couldn't wait years of trading and losing and learning to make profit that's I got an expert to help train and trade for me, I do all my trades with Mr Hovik Morte his been amazing in handling all analysis and calculation, I do enjoy the facts from videos and articles but I'll always prefer the one on one experience trading with Hovik.
I've heard so much about the market. This is exactly what top businessmen and CEOs talk about, how people without degrees could make money online without applying any physical effort. The online trading community is reliable and lucrative enough to when done with proper strategies and guidance.
I'm totally confused as well, my portfolio has drained drastically, I'm now very scared of Trading crypto, can't figure out what's wrong. I need to know how this works.
@@Nikki-qk3jp Same here, My portfolio has been going down the drain while I try trading, I just don't know what I do wrong. I've invested $18,000 into crypto all have now is just $5,356
A stock owner can use a covered call strategy to generate yield on positions that don't pay a dividend. A lot of companies have cash flow but use the cash to grow the business rather than distributing cash to owners. Not paying a dividend doesn't always mean that a company has no positive cash flow. Some companies with the biggest margins pay no dividend. Kevin mentions Munger as an influence; Berkshire Hathaway has never paid a dividend to shareholders.
@@Beeautifullifefarm yep, shows when people don't fully understand dividend growth and how the younger you are the more years you have for the dividends to grow and for you income to really compound
@@Beeautifullifefarm I’m 19 with 8k saved man. I’m diversified with ko brk.b and pm aswell as some SNv and Snapchat from low price. I hope to god this will help me out long term I gotta buy my mom some relaxation.
So many different ways to invest. In the end, you make your own decisions and you are accountable for the wins and losses. I think it's funny how people differentiate between investing and speculating. Yes, there's a logical difference but ultimately, you put money in a stock and hope for the best, whether you've done research or not. Some stocks people buy, based on solid research, have failed while some stocks people buy, based on emotions/passion and no research, have been huge successes. Figure out your goals in life and take the appropriate approach that works best for you.
I’m very happy to have found this channel. I’m new and learning. No I’m in my family knows about stuff like this and is poor with money. Myself included but I’m learning and my son will at least be wealthy based on the decisions I make now
I took Kevins advice several years ago and Invested in the Canadian dividend fund. It is rolling over in my tax free savings account. Best decision I ever made.
OUSA ETF looks okay to me. Currently 2.03% dividend yield and about 8% per annum growth over the past 5 years. Require more insights but at face value comes across as a decent conservative play. Might buy into it when I'm 50+ years old.
That's a good point. Berkshire Hathaway is one of the few exceptions to that, and I think that's because the company essentially runs itself as a giant mutual fund, with would-be dividends being "auto-reinvested" back into the company's holdings.
A total market fund such as VTI still outperforms Kevin O'Leary's dividend ETF. Over the past 5 years, VTI outperformed OUSA by 34%. Even the Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF(SCHD) outperformed OUSA by 13% over the past 5 years. Your better off just buying and selling a total market fund every month-few months. VTI's dividend is slightly less but still outperforms by a long shot.
Five-year performance (sourced from Google Finance, as 18 Dec 2020): O'Shares US Quality Dividend ETF (ticker OUSA) up 50.55%. Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF (ticker VTI) up 83.47%.
Great video! I honestly didn't like him on shark tank but I have a new found respect for him. He doesn't waste his time with the lyfts and tslas because he is looking for that free cash flow. Which 30 years on will matter more than the latest greatest gadget from your favorite meme ceo. Also he is dealing with a lot more money and people are counting on him to preserve capital in his family. So it makes sense that he owns relatively boring companies.
I think you bring up a great point about ETFs and why people should be careful with expense ratios, but I think there are dividend ETFs that can provide a solid base for a portfolio that someone can build upon with more dividend stocks. Take SCHD for example. The fund is higher yielding and has a significantly lower expense ratio than OUSA. But definitely agree with you that expense ratios are something new investors should consider before buying in to a fund!
I think he also should note that there are lower expense ratios (via other ETF's) and with the share loaning done by some ETF's, the expense ratio is lowered or almost nonexistent. Vanguard is a good example.
@@Yeah_Buddy_LIGHTWEIGHT Yes him skimming almost half a percent wouldn't work for me. It wouldn't be a great feat to roughly replicate the fund. Or just buy a fund like DGRO or whatever.
Every time I watch your videos on expanded, I make the screen small to like and it’s already liked. I do this a few times during the video. I wish these extra likes could count towards your main LB(LikeBank) 😅
450 years ago the modern day "Stock Market" was born. A "Stock" is the wooden frame of a Ship. You gave "the company" capital, and they gave you part of a Stock/Ship, in the form of a written agreement. That ship/stock traveled the world, delivering iron, grains, door knobs, or cats (meow cats, Tim Dexter), whatever. They realized a profit, returned with the profit, and paid dividends to the owners of the Ships/Stocks. Same principal today. Dividends are core to Speculation Market. Everything else is emotion. Do it all i say, a strong core, and some speculative fun
Don't get into dividends for passive income streams . Take those dividends and put them back into the stock thus multiplying your dividends for higher dividend payouts so on and so forth . If you took 100 dollars a month and put it into a dividend paying out let's say 2.5% annualy it doesn't seem like much but over the course of 25 years its a crapload of cash . Not including what you made in dividends with it its even more . Remember setting money in the bank does nothing for you and in fact you are fighting inflation every year .money sitting in the bank will be worth less 25 years from now . You are bleeding money by doing that . Grab those dividend stocks and make them work for you and for itself
I totally agree,a smart investor has their portfolio in view at all times and when a high quality stock drops in value you can rebuy and lower your cost basis which can produce great returns. ETF's like OUSA will underperform investors that do this. Also of course the fees. I like ETF's mostly for investment strategies I personally am not interested in persuing due to time cost or because I just dont understand them well enough,like ETF's that overwrite some of their assets or fixed income securities on international markets. Other than that OUSA might be a great investment for someone who has no idea about the market and no time or interest in learning either but knows dividends are a great way to get wealthy slowly.
"living off dividends" does not mean you have to replace your existing income. very far from it. First of all, if you don't want to "save" anymore, then you don't need to make that "extra" money to put away. second, if you invested in good companies, that raise their dividends, you don't need to worry about "reinvesting" dividends. Also, having a passive income from dividends, allows you to sell your house, etc, and move somewhere where salaries maybe 5-6 times lower, but also the cost of living 5-6 times lower as well. You can comfortably live on $1500 per month in many countries in the world. and , just because you moved, does not mean you can't do casual jobs here and there. i think its the combination of multiple things that will allow majority of people to achieve financial success. I have my own channel, if anyone interested in hearing more my opinions and plans on this topic.
Yeah sure ... if you bought not paying dividend stocks like Amazon Apple Netflix 10 years ago how would they compare now with your dividend-paying stocks?
Thanks .but this advice is for pro stock holders .beginners will be totally lost and fellow exactly how you explained in reality trading and end up in losses. coming to hear to watch video on RUclips is not gathering experience look for a superior trader to Guid you as you learn you profit as well
During the pandemic a few “strong” companies I owned stopped paying dividends. I sold them. Not sticking with companies that don’t pay dividends. P.s. notice Kevin’s red watch band. It’s like his signature. 👍 p.s. you did a nice job of analyzing dividend stocks ETF’s in regard to their positive and negative traits.
@@RIGHTNOW108 I sold half my Disney stock when they stopped the dividend. The only reason I kept half was because my wife suggested I do that. However, to be honest, I should have held on to the stock. I am sure you know, as a Disney shareholder, that the stock has gone WAY UP since cutting the dividend. Oh, well. Can’t win them all. Lol Mark
I currently own a small account of dividend paying stocks. S&P and about 3 REITs. I get $70 drip every month and I love it. To me anything else is hope and speculation for the future.
@@SMSBJM1981 I usually take 10-15% of my after tax dollars and invest. Doesn't matter how small the amount, I buy an asset. I reinvest all the dividends. Once you get it growing, it'll water itself.
Like anything else the right answer is different for each of us, it depends on your goals, timeframe and risk tolerance. As I plan for early retirement in 5 years or less, I'm looking at dividend income, among other things. My goal is to convert a minimum of my portfolio to income producing (stocks and ETFs) for the sole purpose of providing slightly more than my estimated living expenses; and adjust as needed going forward. This will leave the majority of my portfolio with the same objectives (mostly growth, some income) Now, I hope the market correction / drop occurs in 2021 to stay on my 5 years or less schedule. ;)
My portfolio yields weekly dividends giving good out of the money covered calls. TSLS last week paid $830. The prior week $750. I now make more money in one week than I did working. I not only make this happen with TSLA but fas, amd, cmi and a few others.
I can't say I agree with him on this, no. Granted there are often tax differences regarding how income from dividends is treated compared to income from capital gains of share price appreciation, but after accounting for that and looking at net returns, what difference does it make whether that $10,000 you made came from a dividend paying stock or a non-dividend paying stock? It all spends the same. It's all probabilities. A good quality non-dividend stock is not necessarily any more speculative than a good quality dividend payer. After all, the dividend payer is also a speculation. You are speculating that the company will continue to pay its dividend when it may not. Analyse and consider each company on its own merits then go with whichever ones you feel best about. If you can make a good case for estimating that a growth stock will appreciate in value by, for example, 25% per year for the next few years then why would you put your money in a 3.5% dividend yielder instead? Ride that wave of growth to build your working capital and then dump it all into good dividend payers when you no longer see any good growth prospects which you are confident about.
youre right, but a dividend is more predictable. my "coronavirus money" generates 5.8% currently and that will only go up in time. along with the price appreciation over the last 9 months im super happy with what ive put together.
he is 100% correct, Look at any "junior" oil and mining company, The only thing left in a financial statement is the money execs cant fig a way to squander. Majors have it to a science, Execs want dividends and an expense account, Not a salary. and milk the company for all its worth
It does make sense what his saying I also think that what if something happens to you. At least with dividend stocks you get to enjoy some of the money soon and invest some back you choose. What about if in a decade or less than that you're no longer on this earth. You don't get to enjoy the company that didn't give you a dividend because your dead. I don't know much because I just started learning about investing but this makes sense to me.
You make a point I've been thinking about lately too. Seems better to not rely on ETFs...better to research what the big ETFs are investing in and build and maintain your own portfolio.
O’Leary shares common strategies as I do. Like with Tesla, yes it’s overpriced. But no one knows by how much. The way he buys at technically opportune times, and sells into the Amazon strength portions of his position. He keeps doing that until most of his position is liquidated. He leaves the last 1/4 to the market. That’s what I have done. Now I have a small amount of capital at risk running with the momentum. If the returns go from 500% to 1500% I may sell it all. But most likely it will get hammered but the majority of my position has returns over 600% +.... great strategy
This guy sounds crazy. I’m all about dividends but what about growth? He can invest in only dividends because he’s got millions, but the average person needs a little bit of both.
No he doesn’t. Dividends and capital appreciation is not the only way for cashflow. I own stocks that don’t pay dividends and I’m not really bothered about whether they appreciate in value or not, as that is speculation, but I still get monthly income from them.
7% is what the whole market increases on average per year, if you keep reinvesting (especially when it’s low) then you’re keeping up with the market if not exceeding growth
@@flaringfirefang My S&P500 indexes have performed better than that. Granted this year is funky. I also don't think AT&T has a competitive edge with their traditional dish platform or mobile services, do thought I'll ask other people's outlook
@@dayvidsdays5644 invested a few grand 2 months ago when atnt was down hard, it’s now up on price and getting a sweet 7.6% dividen from it. Way I see it, as long as growth remains the same or slightly higher, it’s all good
@@Guitardudeftw true. I think you locked in at a good price then cause your starting price isn't looking for appreciation. I was purposing the different approach for investing if someone wants to go more towards a growth approach
I don't believe there is only one way to do anything! Dividends are great definitely, but there are other strategies I believe that can be used profitably also! Just like there are many ways to invest in real estate.
That expense ratio is insane. To contrast, VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03%, SPY has an expense ratio of 0.09%, and OUSA has an expense ratio of 0.48%. For a slow grind dividend stock, that's just not acceptable. VTI returns a 1.4% dividend while OUSA returns 2.33%, but that expense ratio eats HALF of the difference in dividend payment. Meanwhile, over the last 5 years, VTI has doubled in underlying value, while OUSA has appreciated by ~50%. I don't see the value.
A lot of tech stocks don’t pay dividends but they explode Wayfare Facebook Google Snapchat Twitter don’t pay dividend dividends stocks like oil and steel while stable don’t give you that kind of return I’d say diversify
If you look for great dividend stock look for XTB - they are growing up rapidly now, increasing their business on the whole world, they are like European robin hood. They have dividend policy to pay 50~100% of profit. This year they paid 50% ... look for yourself - cheers mate
Can someone explain to me why he hypes up his dividend etf's so much, and when you go look at his etf's, after management fees, you receive 1.5% yield. Thats absolutely abysmal. That means for every million dollars you put in you only yield $15,000. To a millionaire that might make sense, but to the average joe who can only invest 10-20k a year, that 1.5% will get you nowhere (that doesn't even cover inflation).
His fund has a dividend yield of 1.7% with an expense ration of over .4% just buy SCHD it has an almost 3% dividend yield and a .06% expense ration and its growth is very similar its a better option
An expense ratio of 0.48%. VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03%. OUSA's expense ratio is 15x higher than VTI. I like the idea of OUSA being only curated top producing 100 companies with dividend payouts, but not at the 'expense' of a high expense ratio. A more direct comparison would be VIG, Vanguard's dividend appreciation ETF. It's expense ratio is 0.06%, which is 8x less than OUSA. If OUSA cuts the expense ratio to be competitive, I'd go for it. Not until though.
@@omaral-maitah181 Don't get trapped in the idea that your dividend yield has to be the biggest it can be. AGNC for example has an attractive monthly dividend payout, but I don't see any future in them. Even with the dividend pay outs, making losses is very realistic on this stock. At&T is trading below value(also because of the attractive dividend yield), and could potentially be a real winner down the road. Although they are competing with some really innovative growth companies so imo it's a longshot. What I'm trying to say is that there is more then just the dividend itself, there is also the health situation of the company you're investing in. How are their revenues, how much debt do they have, how do they distribute, future plans,... The current dividend of the companies I mentioned can seem, but they are fairly healthy companies with an increasing dividend. I personally rather go for a "safer" company for my dividends. Although I also have exposure to At&T so I do get your point as well. Maybe it's an idea to diversify and look into some stocks you may like, there are many more similar stocks like those I mentioned, there isn't 1 golden egg, so go with the ones you like, but don't be afraid of some lower dividend yield from time to time. Goodluck with your investments!
So as a new investor, is buying fractional shares into Warren Buffett's stock not good then? Because he doesn't pay any dividends, would you consider it a good buy?
The advice is total shit lmao, if you have a long term portfolio you should be looking for growth. Dividends are for when you're already old and rich and want to protect your money.
Nevertheless, on a 5 year scale, his fund has trailed the S&P 500 index - so I guess a pure index fund at a lower TER will be better for most investors
@@RicardoSanchez-es5wl His own argument was that most of stock's overall performance comes from their dividends and that therefore, non-dividend stock won't perform as well. According to this reasoning, a fund exclusively of dividend stock would have to do better than an index consisting of paying and non-paying stock. I know that there is Lynch's analogy that if too much money accumulates in the corporate bladder, management will feel pressured to piss it away - but if a company and their shareholders agree that more wealth will be compounded inside the company than by paying money out, so be it. I think this just unnecessarily reduces his choice of companies to invest in.
Dividend paying stock...the only tried and true investing method to generate guaranteed cash returns. BMO has never missed and paid a continuous quarterly dividend since 1829. That right since 1829 throughout every single recession and the great depression.
Exactly my thoughts, but this is why the stock market is so great and will always function, even after decades of experience, investors have compltely different oppinions
What he means is that these companies are likely to pay a dividend at some point which is why the shares have value there is no value in assets which have no ability to produce a cash flow in money terms except for a few exceptions in terms of intrinsic value such as gold. That’s just the fundamental economics behind companies which is why when companies who do pay dividends cut suspend or end their dividends share prices tank
I made my first million investing in the stock market with help of a professional broker I met after his conference in Texas ,he agreed to handle my trades and its been going pretty well, excited for what comes next
Do you agree with Mr. Wonderful? Subscribe for more stock reviews!
Join the Discord: www.patreon.com/DividendData
Follow on Instagram: instagram.com/dividenddata/
Follow On Twitter: twitter.com/dividend_data
Subscribe: ruclips.net/channel/UCZ5V5HyAvkFrjsWkANqXscQr
Dividend Data 75% of my portfolio is made up of dividend stocks. I’m good with that for now.
Front running the berkshire dividend declaration #1
I would take QUAL over OUSA any day. Exp ratio is equal, but QUAL has outperformed OUSA by 10 % points over the last year. QUAL has lower div yield 1.4% vs 2.4% I would expect Kevin to put his out there.
Dividends are great, but to earn wealth from nothing I think I need something more powerful. If the average dividend yield is 4% and my rate of savings is $200 per month, it is going to take me 30 years just to get anywhere. I've decided to mix it up into 4 areas. 1) dividends, 2) Index funds, 3) FundRise (real estate) 4) dreamfire52 (forex copy trading). If I get 4% from dividends 8% from index funds, 10% from fundrise and 30% from dreamfire52, I'll make it in 10 years...
@@glendemarco250 1. Dividends don't stay at 3-4 % forever, they usually grow. Try to pick some companies within this 3-4 % sweet spot with an annual dividend growth rate >6-7%.
Indexfunds are extremely overvalued at this point, i would not! maybe some emerging markets that are cheap.
Maybe you should focus on getting you savings up, take another job, start a business or something. there are plenty of opportunities.
merry christmas from germany.
Great video! My acknowledgement to you for your knowledge on business lesson that helped me understand the market trial with real reason why people get poorer, And How to Avoid this situation
Great advice on crypto and passive. Tells it like it is,honest opinion. Only promoting what is working in the market
@Colleen BruceYou're welcome, Can share some business tips that helped me,
1. Plan towards it
2. Be minimal on spending
3. Save money wisely towards retirement 4. Then be ready to take a profitable procedure as you venture into the market system, it's a proven way to get richer.
Yeah I know you're speaking of investing, I would appreciate if you could more details on how one can start a great and profitable procedure.
You can only appreciate a person who tries to teach everyone how to invest and making profit on multiple ways in Forex investment
@@Whitney233Please share more details, I don't want to remain out of ignorance
This explains a lot about why every deal he offers he demands a royalty
That's why its important to have royalties.
I never understood why you wouldn’t want a royalty
My aunt lives very comfortably off her late husband's royalties in oil... royalties are the way if you belive the investment you are putting money into is going to stay and grow big... which all your investments should have this mentality
“Tamara Diane Hagan " is one I'm quite familiar with, I came across her on an investment webinar.. You can look up with her name online , you will find her website to know more about the service she offer...cheers
Absolutely
Financial investment can be emotionally exhausting/frustrating in a case where inconsistency in trade wins is much. Positive results are guaranteed more if one works with a reliable professional. My most sincere take though!!
I share the same view. Tried to make a start on crypto investment but was almost frustrated out by heavy loses till JOANNA MALIVA LEE was recommended to me. She has been managing my portfolios for a while now and have never faltered
@@josiefrench7672 Wow, so grad someone is talking about Joanna Maliva Lee, her investment strategies are top notch. Have been following her guidance
@@josiefrench7672 Much thanks
because your brain is weak :)
@@josiefrench7672 I lost my entire savings with Joanna and my house. 0/5 stars
Today it's not about return ON capital. Today it is about return OF capital.
"Free cash flow is the only reason to own stocks" I agree with the sentiment.
Thats right
I like Kevin and think he has a strong point when it comes to dividend paying stocks. But his ETF is expensive. If your looking for a dividend ETF I'd look at Vanguard's VIG or Schwab's SCHD. Both have an ER of .06% and have solid track records over a longer period of time.
+1 for SCHD
@@acali18 SCHD is just miles ahead of other dividend ETFs in terms of quality and yield
Finally someone agrees with me. I'm an amateur but I've always seen non-dividend paying shares similar to Ponzi schemes. It's only worth something because someone might be convinced to pay you more for it, because someone might pay them more for it, because someone might pay them more for it too and so on.
I am not really a growth kind of guy, but stocks are not like crypto. Stocks have a business behind them; cash flow, earning, reputation and many more complicated things. Not going to get into them, but stocks have a value behind them. Crypto and Ponzi schemes do not. They are a greater fool theory. The only reason they have value is someone says they do. They do not have cash flow and earning (for the investors, only the founders). They have a reputation, but it’s not a good one like a business.
I hope that made sense.
Well if you're just invested in a total fund like VTI/VTSAX or a S&P Fund like VOO/VTIAX then it doesn't matter. If you're someone that's prone to stock-picking and speculation, or you think the Boglehead philosophy is boring, yeah sure go for Dividend Investing. You won't make more money than my VTI/VXUS/BND portfolio though.
@@michaelfenell3602 I agree with what you are saying - stocks represent a real value, unlike something like crypto. However, as a shareholder without dividends you do not really have any way of interacting with or extracting that value. You can access the value if the company is bought, or if it closes, or if it starts providing dividends in the future. But you do not innately have any real connection to the value of the company. A company could be undervalued for years and you would not gain any benefit from it as an investor without dividends, because you only make money by someone else being willing to pay more for your share. If a company with dividends is undervalued, you are getting great yield on your investment and should be happy.
Concretely, say that there is a company that consists of a giant safe with one million dollars in cash. You own 1% of the company. With your 1%, you have no way to actually access your 10,000 dollars of cash. The only way you get your 10,000 dollars worth for your shares is if someone else is willing to pay 10,000 dollars for the 1% share.
@@theWebWizrd yeah it does seem like a Ponzi scheme, but i think there’s theoretically a difference. The value is inaccessible only if the “no dividend” is an ironclad rule. I like buffets approach where he essentially says, “we’re happy to give you a dividend as soon as we think the dollar sitting your pocket is worth (net present value) as much or more than a dollar invested with us”. It just so happens they haven’t yet found that moment, but in that case it’s less locked in a safe for all time and more akin to money you entrust to somebody that they will only allow you to withdraw when it is optimal to withdraw. (Of course this is all to distinguish theoretically between no-dividend and a ponzi scheme. In practical terms there’s always a way to get your money out.)
Boy how times have changed. Kevin now owns a lot of crypto and other than potential staking they don’t pay a dividend. He owns fintech companies, and many other tech firms that don’t pay dividends.
Hearing Kevin Leary talk about dividend investing makes me feel oddly satisfied lol
i know right!? dividend investing is all i do. and him talking about how he only does DIV's is very cathartic.
This feeling is called confirmation bias and it’s not a good thing to celebrate lol
@@savvygames5474 what do you invest in??? let me guess,tesla nio and gamestop?!?!?!?
@@savvygames5474 but dividend investing is not a negative thing, so why does bias matter? Confirmation bias relates to being bias to one thing and disregarding contradicting information, what contradicting information is there about dividend investing?
You & me both
Kevin says it himself, he is more concerned with preserving his existing wealth rather than creating wealth.
That would explain the 1.9% dividend lol
This is exactly why I chose dividend growth investing as my main strategy. Absolutely brilliant.
U have to pay taxes on it
@@benyaminmiller5504 Not necessarily. If you are married, which I am, I can withdraw $80,000 a year in qualified dividend income and pay 0 in taxes. After that and on up to nearly $500k in dividends, I only pay the capital gains tax rate of 15%...still better than ordinary job income.
not if you put it in a roth ira
@@iamdavis012686 I was unaware. I haven’t looked into it too deep yet as I’m not even in a bracket yet. Thank you so much foretelling me that it is duly noted.
@@benyaminmiller5504 Happy to fill you in. I really like it as an investing strategy because even if you’re pulling out all of the income it still tends to go up every year as the companies increase their dividends
Kevin O'Leary that guy is absolute beast! Just look how good he predicted and convinced you for sure that Meta stocks already hit it's max bottom and that you should buy at that moment
I trust Buffet more on his approach. If a business is producing high free cash flow, then it can either invest in new projects or runways within the business or pay dividends or do share buybacks. I think what Kevin is missing is that if you have free cash flow per share increasing, this is good news for the investor no matter if it’s directly paid to them through dividend distributions or if it stays reinvested in the company
Interesting!
You say "If it stays reinvested in the company" -- Okay, but then you'd have to keep assessing whether the company is investing in the right ways, in order to keep the stock price increasing. A stable or growing dividend is cash coming directly at you and proving that the company has been doing the right things (to maintain the dividend) and is devoted to maintaining or increasing its dividend.
I'm 58 year old Dividend investor, my wife and I have invested in the S&P500, through my TSP with the government and her fidelity in the 401-k, got a huge payout of 330k from s&p and I invested with a full service broker Mr Hovik Morte, until around 3 years ago our portfolio had increases exponentially through s&p after over 25 years, I plan on the leaving my physical labor job and retiring at 60 and my wife will retire at 58 and live off our burly 2 million dollars in our tax deferred savings, But I'll keep trading constantly after retirement with my broker and spending quality time with my grandkids.
Wow this is amazing!!!....
At least you have a well structured plan. Trading the stock market has been a headache for me since I got into it, I placed trades with the help of articles I see online and it's resulted in losses I don't get what I'm doing wrong... how do you understand this stuff?
The stock market is a place to change your life and make tons of money and it can also be a place to lose a whole lot more investing poorly. Making profit doesn't run with luck, it takes skill, expertise and understanding to perfectly execute proper strategies to make passive profit. Such skill and Expertise only come from constant practice from years. So I couldn't wait years of trading and losing and learning to make profit that's I got an expert to help train and trade for me, I do all my trades with Mr Hovik Morte his been amazing in handling all analysis and calculation, I do enjoy the facts from videos and articles but I'll always prefer the one on one experience trading with Hovik.
I've heard so much about the market. This is exactly what top businessmen and CEOs talk about, how people without degrees could make money online without applying any physical effort. The online trading community is reliable and lucrative enough to when done with proper strategies and guidance.
Contact Hovik
@
l've been trading for 5months now but no good returns rather I loss and blow up my account, really heart breaking.
I'm totally confused as well, my portfolio has drained drastically, I'm now very scared of Trading crypto, can't figure out what's wrong. I need to know how this works.
@@Nikki-qk3jp Same here, My portfolio has been going down the drain while I try trading, I just don't know what I do wrong. I've invested $18,000 into crypto all have now is just $5,356
@@sirgiojimenez2279 Trading on your own is very risky, many people have lost a lot trading for themselves.
@@sirgiojimenez2279 All you need now is a professional trader else you will continue making losses.
@@sirgiojimenez2279 That's true, you need an Expert broker and account manager to make good profit from bitcoin trade.
"I am really boring and I like it that way"
- Thats what you have to be in order to be successful in the investing jungle. BORING.
A stock owner can use a covered call strategy to generate yield on positions that don't pay a dividend. A lot of companies have cash flow but use the cash to grow the business rather than distributing cash to owners. Not paying a dividend doesn't always mean that a company has no positive cash flow. Some companies with the biggest margins pay no dividend. Kevin mentions Munger as an influence; Berkshire Hathaway has never paid a dividend to shareholders.
Dividends+Covered Call Strategy+Price Appreciation = win
Too much of anything can be bad. Healthy balance of dividend and growth, especially when you are young, will work just fine.
35 and have been doing nothing but dividend investing since 16 not going to change a thing, doing great
@@Beeautifullifefarm How large is your portfolio?
@@Beeautifullifefarm yep, shows when people don't fully understand dividend growth and how the younger you are the more years you have for the dividends to grow and for you income to really compound
@@Beeautifullifefarm I’m 19 with 8k saved man. I’m diversified with ko brk.b and pm aswell as some SNv and Snapchat from low price. I hope to god this will help me out long term I gotta buy my mom some relaxation.
@@Beeautifullifefarm Dude. You must be making 50k or more a year to sleep. I started at 20. I’m 22 now. Best decision I made.
This video is knowledge and wisdom handed to you on a silver spoon presentation!
Kevin is my favorite shark always keeps it 💯 when it comes to business and the entrepreneurs on the show. Never any fluff
So many different ways to invest. In the end, you make your own decisions and you are accountable for the wins and losses. I think it's funny how people differentiate between investing and speculating. Yes, there's a logical difference but ultimately, you put money in a stock and hope for the best, whether you've done research or not. Some stocks people buy, based on solid research, have failed while some stocks people buy, based on emotions/passion and no research, have been huge successes. Figure out your goals in life and take the appropriate approach that works best for you.
I’m very happy to have found this channel. I’m new and learning. No I’m in my family knows about stuff like this and is poor with money. Myself included but I’m learning and my son will at least be wealthy based on the decisions I make now
I took Kevins advice several years ago and Invested in the Canadian dividend fund. It is rolling over in my tax free savings account. Best decision I ever made.
OUSA ETF looks okay to me. Currently 2.03% dividend yield and about 8% per annum growth over the past 5 years. Require more insights but at face value comes across as a decent conservative play. Might buy into it when I'm 50+ years old.
(4:56):
"A stock that doesn't pay a dividend is a speculation. It's not an investment."
That's a good point. Berkshire Hathaway is one of the few exceptions to that, and I think that's because the company essentially runs itself as a giant mutual fund, with would-be dividends being "auto-reinvested" back into the company's holdings.
A total market fund such as VTI still outperforms Kevin O'Leary's dividend ETF. Over the past 5 years, VTI outperformed OUSA by 34%. Even the Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF(SCHD) outperformed OUSA by 13% over the past 5 years. Your better off just buying and selling a total market fund every month-few months. VTI's dividend is slightly less but still outperforms by a long shot.
Five-year performance (sourced from Google Finance, as 18 Dec 2020):
O'Shares US Quality Dividend ETF (ticker OUSA) up 50.55%.
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF (ticker VTI) up 83.47%.
would love an update on his etf
Great video! I honestly didn't like him on shark tank but I have a new found respect for him. He doesn't waste his time with the lyfts and tslas because he is looking for that free cash flow. Which 30 years on will matter more than the latest greatest gadget from your favorite meme ceo. Also he is dealing with a lot more money and people are counting on him to preserve capital in his family. So it makes sense that he owns relatively boring companies.
I watch a lot of dividend channels..your video intro is unmatched
I think you bring up a great point about ETFs and why people should be careful with expense ratios, but I think there are dividend ETFs that can provide a solid base for a portfolio that someone can build upon with more dividend stocks. Take SCHD for example. The fund is higher yielding and has a significantly lower expense ratio than OUSA. But definitely agree with you that expense ratios are something new investors should consider before buying in to a fund!
Yes, SCHD is a good one. Expense is nowhere near as high, as you stated :) Having said that.. the stocks in OUSA look great.
I think he also should note that there are lower expense ratios (via other ETF's) and with the share loaning done by some ETF's, the expense ratio is lowered or almost nonexistent. Vanguard is a good example.
@@avburns Share loaning for shorting?
@@fendermon good individually or in a different ETF for sure. Don't think I'd own this ETF. Expense ratio is too high for my taste.
@@Yeah_Buddy_LIGHTWEIGHT Yes him skimming almost half a percent wouldn't work for me. It wouldn't be a great feat to roughly replicate the fund. Or just buy a fund like DGRO or whatever.
Every time I watch your videos on expanded, I make the screen small to like and it’s already liked. I do this a few times during the video. I wish these extra likes could count towards your main LB(LikeBank) 😅
"why would you buy a stock that doesn't pay a dividend"
It's called growth...Amazon and Berkshire don't pay a dividend either...
Yeah, but for how long are those companies going to "grow"?
@@mboniledawson229 Depends on the company...
Yeah but both those companies are worth billions so it's really hard to justify their "growth" tag
@@mboniledawson229 Until they reach market saturation and start paying a dividend to keep their stock price afloat
Sounds like a con if you ask me. Berkshire owns coca cola, coca cola turns a profit and still no dividends?
450 years ago the modern day "Stock Market" was born. A "Stock" is the wooden frame of a Ship. You gave "the company" capital, and they gave you part of a Stock/Ship, in the form of a written agreement. That ship/stock traveled the world, delivering iron, grains, door knobs, or cats (meow cats, Tim Dexter), whatever. They realized a profit, returned with the profit, and paid dividends to the owners of the Ships/Stocks. Same principal today.
Dividends are core to Speculation Market. Everything else is emotion. Do it all i say, a strong core, and some speculative fun
Don't get into dividends for passive income streams . Take those dividends and put them back into the stock thus multiplying your dividends for higher dividend payouts so on and so forth . If you took 100 dollars a month and put it into a dividend paying out let's say 2.5% annualy it doesn't seem like much but over the course of 25 years its a crapload of cash . Not including what you made in dividends with it its even more . Remember setting money in the bank does nothing for you and in fact you are fighting inflation every year .money sitting in the bank will be worth less 25 years from now . You are bleeding money by doing that . Grab those dividend stocks and make them work for you and for itself
Absolutely
That’s why he made the snowball video
I've watched this video many many times a day for the last few months. This is gold for investors like myself
I totally agree,a smart investor has their portfolio in view at all times and when a high quality stock drops in value you can rebuy and lower your cost basis which can produce great returns.
ETF's like OUSA will underperform investors that do this. Also of course the fees.
I like ETF's mostly for investment strategies I personally am not interested in persuing due to time cost or because I just dont understand them well enough,like ETF's that overwrite some of their assets or fixed income securities on international markets.
Other than that OUSA might be a great investment for someone who has no idea about the market and no time or interest in learning either but knows dividends are a great way to get wealthy slowly.
"living off dividends" does not mean you have to replace your existing income. very far from it. First of all, if you don't want to "save" anymore, then you don't need to make that "extra" money to put away. second, if you invested in good companies, that raise their dividends, you don't need to worry about "reinvesting" dividends. Also, having a passive income from dividends, allows you to sell your house, etc, and move somewhere where salaries maybe 5-6 times lower, but also the cost of living 5-6 times lower as well. You can comfortably live on $1500 per month in many countries in the world. and , just because you moved, does not mean you can't do casual jobs here and there. i think its the combination of multiple things that will allow majority of people to achieve financial success.
I have my own channel, if anyone interested in hearing more my opinions and plans on this topic.
These are solid advice! This is my 11th year investing in the stock market. Mostly dividend stocks.
So what has been your experience overall? Winning or losing? Is it really worth I after all these years?
@@nesq4104 check out my portfolio. Alhamdulillah, I'm up.
Yeah sure ... if you bought not paying dividend stocks like Amazon Apple Netflix 10 years ago how would they compare now with your dividend-paying stocks?
Thanks .but this advice is for pro stock holders .beginners will be totally lost and fellow exactly how you explained in reality trading and end up in losses. coming to hear to watch video on RUclips is not gathering experience look for a superior trader to Guid you as you learn you profit as well
Yes!! They never should have abandoned XOM😡....your correct !!! They should have loaded up on it !!!
Love O'leary's little speeches, I always feel wiser having listened
My name is Zach, I am also a dividend investor. I like your style 😎
During the pandemic a few “strong” companies I owned stopped paying dividends. I sold them. Not sticking with companies that don’t pay dividends. P.s. notice Kevin’s red watch band. It’s like his signature. 👍 p.s. you did a nice job of analyzing dividend stocks ETF’s in regard to their positive and negative traits.
Still hurting over Disney pulling their dividend. I'm way up on the stock, but I'm thinking they may never reinstate it.
@@RIGHTNOW108 I sold half my Disney stock when they stopped the dividend. The only reason I kept half was because my wife suggested I do that. However, to be honest, I should have held on to the stock. I am sure you know, as a Disney shareholder, that the stock has gone WAY UP since cutting the dividend. Oh, well. Can’t win them all. Lol Mark
I currently own a small account of dividend paying stocks. S&P and about 3 REITs. I get $70 drip every month and I love it. To me anything else is hope and speculation for the future.
@@SMSBJM1981 I usually take 10-15% of my after tax dollars and invest. Doesn't matter how small the amount, I buy an asset. I reinvest all the dividends. Once you get it growing, it'll water itself.
“The only thing that matters is free cash flow.” Well pretty much.
Ummm duh!
Like anything else the right answer is different for each of us, it depends on your goals, timeframe and risk tolerance.
As I plan for early retirement in 5 years or less, I'm looking at dividend income, among other things. My goal is to convert a minimum of my portfolio to income producing (stocks and ETFs) for the sole purpose of providing slightly more than my estimated living expenses; and adjust as needed going forward. This will leave the majority of my portfolio with the same objectives (mostly growth, some income)
Now, I hope the market correction / drop occurs in 2021 to stay on my 5 years or less schedule. ;)
Attention to all the new investors, this video is some of the best advice you're going to randomly stumble upon.
My portfolio yields weekly dividends giving good out of the money covered calls. TSLS last week paid $830. The prior week $750. I now make more money in one week than I did working. I not only make this happen with TSLA but fas, amd, cmi and a few others.
An you break down your portfolio so I can check it out? Thanks
I can't say I agree with him on this, no. Granted there are often tax differences regarding how income from dividends is treated compared to income from capital gains of share price appreciation, but after accounting for that and looking at net returns, what difference does it make whether that $10,000 you made came from a dividend paying stock or a non-dividend paying stock? It all spends the same.
It's all probabilities. A good quality non-dividend stock is not necessarily any more speculative than a good quality dividend payer. After all, the dividend payer is also a speculation. You are speculating that the company will continue to pay its dividend when it may not.
Analyse and consider each company on its own merits then go with whichever ones you feel best about. If you can make a good case for estimating that a growth stock will appreciate in value by, for example, 25% per year for the next few years then why would you put your money in a 3.5% dividend yielder instead? Ride that wave of growth to build your working capital and then dump it all into good dividend payers when you no longer see any good growth prospects which you are confident about.
Exactly, nothing wrong with dividends but they are overrated
@@johnnyvegas4583 I think its generally considered that dividends are simply more predictable.
youre right, but a dividend is more predictable. my "coronavirus money" generates 5.8% currently and that will only go up in time. along with the price appreciation over the last 9 months im super happy with what ive put together.
Never touch principal. Agree 100%. And, only buy dividend paying stocks in companies that are financially strong and reasonably priced.
Odd market we are in where people who wouldn't know a good balance sheet from a basket of Chicken are making most of the profits. Great video.
@Kevin L Come again? I didn't create anything.
O'Leary is speaking my language at 2:25. Stocks that don't pay dividends only work because someone else is willing to pay more for it.
I agree but with very minor exceptions (innovations stocks), Ark ETFs and Tesla 😄, all else generate dividends
he is 100% correct, Look at any "junior" oil and mining company, The only thing left in a financial statement is the money execs cant fig a way to squander. Majors have it to a science, Execs want dividends and an expense account, Not a salary. and milk the company for all its worth
SCHD beats OUSA like a rented mule and at 1/8th the expense ratio.
It does make sense what his saying I also think that what if something happens to you. At least with dividend stocks you get to enjoy some of the money soon and invest some back you choose. What about if in a decade or less than that you're no longer on this earth. You don't get to enjoy the company that didn't give you a dividend because your dead. I don't know much because I just started learning about investing but this makes sense to me.
You make a point I've been thinking about lately too. Seems better to not rely on ETFs...better to research what the big ETFs are investing in and build and maintain your own portfolio.
O’Leary shares common strategies as I do. Like with Tesla, yes it’s overpriced. But no one knows by how much. The way he buys at technically opportune times, and sells into the Amazon strength portions of his position. He keeps doing that until most of his position is liquidated. He leaves the last 1/4 to the market. That’s what I have done. Now I have a small amount of capital at risk running with the momentum. If the returns go from 500% to 1500% I may sell it all. But most likely it will get hammered but the majority of my position has returns over 600% +.... great strategy
This guy sounds crazy. I’m all about dividends but what about growth? He can invest in only dividends because he’s got millions, but the average person needs a little bit of both.
OUSA is similar to most div etf’s. Just look at the top 10 holdings
No he doesn’t. Dividends and capital appreciation is not the only way for cashflow. I own stocks that don’t pay dividends and I’m not really bothered about whether they appreciate in value or not, as that is speculation, but I still get monthly income from them.
@@recycle_your_money How?
@@ayebee281 hes lying
You missed the stat with 70%+ of all returns in the past 40 years came from dividends.
completely agree with mr. wonderful. my portfolio is 100% dividend stocks.
I love this video. Thats why I love KO, JPM, wmt, Costco, cat,cmi, msft,aapl they pay me.dividends quarterly
This video is a gem. I love mr wonderful even more thank you
What are people's thoughts on AT&T (T)? It has close to a 7% dividend payout but it seems like a low performer in terms of growth
7% is what the whole market increases on average per year, if you keep reinvesting (especially when it’s low) then you’re keeping up with the market if not exceeding growth
@@flaringfirefang My S&P500 indexes have performed better than that. Granted this year is funky. I also don't think AT&T has a competitive edge with their traditional dish platform or mobile services, do thought I'll ask other people's outlook
@@dayvidsdays5644 invested a few grand 2 months ago when atnt was down hard, it’s now up on price and getting a sweet 7.6% dividen from it. Way I see it, as long as growth remains the same or slightly higher, it’s all good
@@Guitardudeftw true. I think you locked in at a good price then cause your starting price isn't looking for appreciation. I was purposing the different approach for investing if someone wants to go more towards a growth approach
Buying $T at $30 or less is a great option imo.
Great vid! You inspired me to start my own dividend growth channel, Thanks!
Excellent points, good sir. Thanks for discussing ETFs. I'm personally a believer myself, so it was refreshing to hear the other side.
"Chicken on a spit dripping cash" WOW summed it up right there!!
Dividend stocks is for the rich. Growth stocks is for us future dividend stock holders.
You can invest in Reits. A lot of them pay dividends monthly and are relatively cheap. Under $20 a share.
AMC entertainment holdings is the next big squeeze opportunity. Going to be the biggest short squeeze in history. Shorts haven’t covered 💎🙌🚀
He's on CNBC all the time pumping FB and SHOP.
I have been watching this video for years!
This was the first position I ever bought and I put it on a D.R.I.P. Reinvestment program . I am very happy to see you made a video about it .
loaded up on Xom, Sunoco and Chevron months ago and will continue buying more shares, love seeing those high % dividends and appreciation.
Loading back up on Exxon mobil is a great shout. I think they will bounce back!
I don't believe there is only one way to do anything! Dividends are great definitely, but there are other strategies I believe that can be used profitably also! Just like there are many ways to invest in real estate.
This channel popped up on my Home tab on RUclips, this was the first video I watched.
I subscribed immediately. Good shit bro good content.
Glad you enjoy!
That expense ratio is insane. To contrast, VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03%, SPY has an expense ratio of 0.09%, and OUSA has an expense ratio of 0.48%. For a slow grind dividend stock, that's just not acceptable. VTI returns a 1.4% dividend while OUSA returns 2.33%, but that expense ratio eats HALF of the difference in dividend payment. Meanwhile, over the last 5 years, VTI has doubled in underlying value, while OUSA has appreciated by ~50%. I don't see the value.
“She hid it from both of her husbands.” Love that.
Smart.
if a guy hid money from ex wives he would be in jail
@@generalshepherd457 true- revealing the double standard!
@@generalshepherd457 and he would be accused of financial abuse/infidelity. We really do live in a society
What every parent or father should teach their daughters!!
A lot of tech stocks don’t pay dividends but they explode Wayfare Facebook Google Snapchat Twitter don’t pay dividend dividends stocks like oil and steel while stable don’t give you that kind of return I’d say diversify
One of the best videos on youtube !!!! Thank you !!!!
If you look for great dividend stock look for XTB - they are growing up rapidly now, increasing their business on the whole world, they are like European robin hood. They have dividend policy to pay 50~100% of profit. This year they paid 50% ... look for yourself - cheers mate
Can someone explain to me why he hypes up his dividend etf's so much, and when you go look at his etf's, after management fees, you receive 1.5% yield. Thats absolutely abysmal. That means for every million dollars you put in you only yield $15,000. To a millionaire that might make sense, but to the average joe who can only invest 10-20k a year, that 1.5% will get you nowhere (that doesn't even cover inflation).
Just don’t invest in his. Other than that, he’s telling the truth.
His fund has a dividend yield of 1.7% with an expense ration of over .4% just buy SCHD it has an almost 3% dividend yield and a .06% expense ration and its growth is very similar its a better option
I love how he casually says, “adjust gifts to charity” that’s the classiest way to say if I’m making less than expected I’m not giving my money away.
OUSA ETF is a good ETF. OMG!!!!
Just bought 24 of these today.
"You posted something that I will enjoy, and for that reason I'm out"
~ Barbara
Barbaraaaaaaaaaa
Nah way more like damon. That dude invests in less people than I do!
I just pictured her flying away on a broom for some reason…
An expense ratio of 0.48%. VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03%. OUSA's expense ratio is 15x higher than VTI. I like the idea of OUSA being only curated top producing 100 companies with dividend payouts, but not at the 'expense' of a high expense ratio. A more direct comparison would be VIG, Vanguard's dividend appreciation ETF. It's expense ratio is 0.06%, which is 8x less than OUSA. If OUSA cuts the expense ratio to be competitive, I'd go for it. Not until though.
At&t, Chevron, Prudential, Abbv, AGNC, Altria
Thats my diversed stocks, what do you think I should add to dividends ?
Johnson & Johnson, 3M, Pepsico, Coca Cola, Starbucks(when it's more fairly valued), Microsoft(also some good growth potential)
@@jelleversteeg3244 I know about them but their dividends are very low, they are more growth stocks to me than dividend
@@omaral-maitah181 Don't get trapped in the idea that your dividend yield has to be the biggest it can be.
AGNC for example has an attractive monthly dividend payout, but I don't see any future in them. Even with the dividend pay outs, making losses is very realistic on this stock.
At&T is trading below value(also because of the attractive dividend yield), and could potentially be a real winner down the road. Although they are competing with some really innovative growth companies so imo it's a longshot.
What I'm trying to say is that there is more then just the dividend itself, there is also the health situation of the company you're investing in. How are their revenues, how much debt do they have, how do they distribute, future plans,...
The current dividend of the companies I mentioned can seem, but they are fairly healthy companies with an increasing dividend. I personally rather go for a "safer" company for my dividends. Although I also have exposure to At&T so I do get your point as well.
Maybe it's an idea to diversify and look into some stocks you may like, there are many more similar stocks like those I mentioned, there isn't 1 golden egg, so go with the ones you like, but don't be afraid of some lower dividend yield from time to time.
Goodluck with your investments!
Realty Income ,lowes and stag
So as a new investor, is buying fractional shares into Warren Buffett's stock not good then? Because he doesn't pay any dividends, would you consider it a good buy?
The intro is sick man
He's got a good point, but if you are very young, go with small cap. Also just b/c there's no dividend, doesn't mean there's not cash flow.
This advice is gold, I rarely buy stocks that don't pay a dividend, specially in my long term portfolio.
With the way the dollar is going after printing trillions out of thin air. Dividens are not your best friend.
It should be noted... You need more than 1 share. Like dozens to see a decent pay out
@@Guitardudeftw you can reinvet dividens if you like
you say"I rarely buy stocks that don't pay a dividend"
So you do buy stock that dont pay dividend?
The advice is total shit lmao, if you have a long term portfolio you should be looking for growth. Dividends are for when you're already old and rich and want to protect your money.
you were right about energy stock rebound :)
Nevertheless, on a 5 year scale, his fund has trailed the S&P 500 index - so I guess a pure index fund at a lower TER will be better for most investors
His funds aren’t designed to “beat” the S&P 500, they’re designed to pay good, consistent dividends
@@RicardoSanchez-es5wl His own argument was that most of stock's overall performance comes from their dividends and that therefore, non-dividend stock won't perform as well.
According to this reasoning, a fund exclusively of dividend stock would have to do better than an index consisting of paying and non-paying stock.
I know that there is Lynch's analogy that if too much money accumulates in the corporate bladder, management will feel pressured to piss it away - but if a company and their shareholders agree that more wealth will be compounded inside the company than by paying money out, so be it.
I think this just unnecessarily reduces his choice of companies to invest in.
Dividend paying stock...the only tried and true investing method to generate guaranteed cash returns. BMO has never missed and paid a continuous quarterly dividend since 1829. That right since 1829 throughout every single recession and the great depression.
So don’t buy Berkshire, Amazon, Google, Netflix cause they’re not paying dividend and they’re speculation. Well, I disagree
Exactly my thoughts, but this is why the stock market is so great and will always function, even after decades of experience, investors have compltely different oppinions
But they make money, I think he was more talking about the shopifys and Ubers of hey market.
What he means is that these companies are likely to pay a dividend at some point which is why the shares have value there is no value in assets which have no ability to produce a cash flow in money terms except for a few exceptions in terms of intrinsic value such as gold. That’s just the fundamental economics behind companies which is why when companies who do pay dividends cut suspend or end their dividends share prices tank
Add TSLA to the list lol
You forgot Tesla!
Was excited about you at OUSA but geez that expense ratio
I made my first million investing in the stock market with help of a professional broker I met after his conference in Texas ,he agreed to handle my trades and its been going pretty well, excited for what comes next
that's great, can you share your broker?
yes I can but not in public, Mack Daron Wilson look him up to get his info
@@delindahove7700 Alright here I can see his profile on web , looks impressive
last year I was at Macks conference with my wife, it was very informative , I recommend him , he is doing a great job
Scammers