Marcos Vs. Duterte: Whose South China Sea Policy is better?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 4 сен 2024

Комментарии • 128

  • @PacificReport
    @PacificReport  Месяц назад +9

    Ferdinand Marcos Jr is a standout among ASEAN leadership
    ruclips.net/video/rFKVKM-Q9-A/видео.html

    • @controllerplayer1720
      @controllerplayer1720 Месяц назад

      i can sense that the regime back in 2016 - 2022 here in the philippines wants to make our country to be communist by slowly corrupting the military institutions including the police.. also they have a nefarious covert agenda why they put the online gambling and scam hub here in our country that few months and weeks ago there are uniforms of the military of china and found a high powered assault rifles and helmets..

    • @controllerplayer1720
      @controllerplayer1720 Месяц назад

      that entity from davao is really evil.. his face cannot hide itself..

    • @controllerplayer1720
      @controllerplayer1720 Месяц назад

      before the national election here in the philippines back in 2016 i was really feel bad for the people here alone on our town that they want to vote that pro-china..even during its canpaign i can sense already that our country will pass through a wrong direction.. even when first time i saw him i already don't trust that entity because he is really bad..

    • @liesterminator2
      @liesterminator2 Месяц назад

      Hahahaha he is the comedian zlensky of asean 😂

    • @RapPereja
      @RapPereja Месяц назад

      Agree

  • @jeremiasfronda108
    @jeremiasfronda108 Месяц назад +1

    Pres.Marcos having more friendly world leaders than former Pres. Duterte who
    provided help in time of need.Pres.Marcos ' facial expressions shows joy and happiness.

  • @richardfermato837
    @richardfermato837 Месяц назад +16

    Yes marcos is good than d30

  • @ramongabutina8015
    @ramongabutina8015 Месяц назад +1

    Didn't vote for Marcos but he is the only President so far who has the guts to firmly go against China's aggression & grab of Phils' territory.Moredifficult now, due to nonchalant policies of past govts especially the friend posture stance of Duterte,where China not only harrassed Phils' fish & naval boats & have now tenure in some Phils' reef/ shoal but heavily damaged by massive dredging & harmful fishing methods thus almost emptied Phils' (fish &sea turtles & giant clams) sealife & ecosystem,as also pointedly affirmed by UN Arbitral Court in its decision.

  • @dindogattering7669
    @dindogattering7669 Месяц назад +4

    Yes n Yes PBBM❤

  • @maharlikaheir
    @maharlikaheir Месяц назад +21

    We should start calling it the West Philippine Sea - so China can stop claiming it.

    • @chn92694
      @chn92694 Месяц назад

      Not all China Sea is owned by the Philippines either. Just a portion of it.

    • @Stormgameyard
      @Stormgameyard Месяц назад +4

      ​@@chn92694exactly 💯💯 same as well with china..not all china sea belong to china some portion of it..😅😅😅😅

    • @chn92694
      @chn92694 Месяц назад

      @@Stormgameyard yep. China too greedy

    • @blow_my-cock
      @blow_my-cock Месяц назад

      South China Sea is its international name

    • @liesterminator2
      @liesterminator2 Месяц назад

      First get ur own Philippines airline pilot to call it ... they still call it south china sea hahaha

  • @leahgepielago2114
    @leahgepielago2114 Месяц назад +1

    True. Praying🙏

  • @Sambo73063
    @Sambo73063 Месяц назад +21

    With Duterte we lost our country. With BBM we are getting it back... Little by little. Damn you Duterte. Shame on you.

    • @dotv8964
      @dotv8964 Месяц назад +1

      Duterte time that all fisherman can catch fish during hes time but BBM admin fisherman cant get fish to that area . So why BBM is better than Duterte ? 😮

    • @ColoniaMurder20
      @ColoniaMurder20 Месяц назад +4

      @@dotv8964 cost of lost territories.. China can dictate in the future if filipinos allow to fish or ban.. like banning fishing during long period of time.. since Philippines have to ask to China if they allow to go fish or not.. its clearly China can use that reason its their territories alr and they will started extracting oil resources within West Philippines Sea at their will.. since Philippines have to ask China if they allow to fish. China can use it as political tool to control Philippines policy.

    • @miguelselerio4690
      @miguelselerio4690 Месяц назад

      Syur ka nakakapangisda lahat sa panahon ni du30 do more research or bulag bulagan ka kasi panatiko ka ng mga dutae?​@@dotv8964

    • @journeymanX
      @journeymanX Месяц назад +2

      ​@@dotv8964marunong mag sipsip si pdutz sa mga intsik kaya pinayagan,pero short term lang yan,kung bad trip ang intsik eh di pwedeng mangisda,kahit sipsip kapa

    • @user-fu3zc1ef6b
      @user-fu3zc1ef6b Месяц назад

      ⁠@@dotv8964oh you didn't heard the news then. when chinese ship collided to philippine fishing boat and split in half way back during term of PRRD. no action made by PRRD back then and now it's much more intense because of him no action taken have you forgotten about that?

  • @user-rh1wu2fm2b
    @user-rh1wu2fm2b Месяц назад +14

    Duterte surrendered while Marcos refused to give up.

  • @always-fq7yx
    @always-fq7yx Месяц назад +1

    Of course ... Marcos Jr. will be better to drive Phil into chaos like what happened to Ukraine

  • @matthewjay660
    @matthewjay660 Месяц назад +2

    "China's growing assertiveness... ." Pacific Report, you are being WAAAAAY too kind. China hurts, not asserts.

  • @user-rz1wu7ng8w
    @user-rz1wu7ng8w Месяц назад +1

    I remember an ad, a big tarpaulin of former PRRD riding a Haoque motorcycle. He was a dark horse when he ran, very popular with the slogan "CHANGE IS COMING". So many fishermen who were regulars at the Scarborough Shoal undoutedly voted for him. According to Justice Antonio Carpio, during PRRD's administration, the Chinese were allowed to fish in the Scarborough Shoal while Filipino fishermen were driven away by the Chinese Coast Ghard. Change did came to the Filipino fishermen. They became poorer.

    • @user-ct5eu3yd4v
      @user-ct5eu3yd4v Месяц назад

      Change is coming.Dutertes Policy.Philippines is a province of China. Traitor. Fishermen not get rich instead His pocket get richer&richer&richer.

  • @alchristianalvarez3291
    @alchristianalvarez3291 Месяц назад +1

    At Hindi Sonod sonaran o takot SA chikwa Wps ay para SA bansang Pinas at para SA mga sumosunod SA mga henerasyon.

  • @loriemadronio2037
    @loriemadronio2037 Месяц назад +7

    Duterte is coward to fight zhi because h loves zxi very much hahaha❤❤
    I think h is a weak leader not Marcos

    • @rickygoh6246
      @rickygoh6246 Месяц назад

      Luckily Marcos came in otherwise with that jetskyer pinoy fishermen will eat grass.

  • @Varietygames1.01
    @Varietygames1.01 Месяц назад +4

    Marcos is the best president of the Philippines..no to Duterte clan

  • @zanekameafraginal7655
    @zanekameafraginal7655 Месяц назад +7

    Its obvious Duterte screwed OBAMA so no help from the US even he will activate the MDT right..Now PBBM is in better position even he have just settled in Malacanang.The thin fine line between China and US becoming heavier toward US.Duterte knows and called Marcoses to Return to Malacanang for a better progress and fight for WPS.Duterte your wishes are done.Just give cridet to where credit is due..Continuity is the key.

  • @edwinbaluyot191
    @edwinbaluyot191 Месяц назад +19

    the way the dutertes are behaving now, they doesnt deserve another seat in the govt.

    • @Mju629
      @Mju629 Месяц назад +1

      Really?.you know nothing😂😂😂

    • @adamrichard1641
      @adamrichard1641 Месяц назад

      @@Mju629 I think you are the one who knows nothing can you compare what the former president Du30 did for the last 6 yrs in office which he did Little Good & more on Bad to Worst through pain & suffering to the Filipino people & country by his mismanagement & incompetent leader who doesn't deserve to be president and blame on this is the naïve/foolish/stupid voted him to office is the Majority of the Filipino voters & people who lack good judgement of what leaders/representative voted in the government office that the nation really needs

    • @xVxStriderxVx
      @xVxStriderxVx Месяц назад

      @@Mju629 The Dutertes are corrupt and the safe haven they call "Davao" is only a save haven for Criminal syndicates, di ka ba nanonood ng mga balita tungkol sa davao?

    • @edwinbaluyot191
      @edwinbaluyot191 Месяц назад

      @@Mju629 do you know everything?

    • @mariaangelicadahl7685
      @mariaangelicadahl7685 Месяц назад +1

      @@Mju629Do you know where are the billions of pesos was transfer to Duterte bank account during the pandemic?? ✌️ And under his admin he wants the Phils . to be a province of China ,, are you favorbof that???

  • @JeffSmith-yk1xb
    @JeffSmith-yk1xb Месяц назад +1

    Good luck

  • @jesuslazado9383
    @jesuslazado9383 Месяц назад +1

    Spin pa more. Propaganda pa more.

  • @alexandergecosala3133
    @alexandergecosala3133 Месяц назад +8

    Mr. Marcos is popularly known in the Philippines as the Plunderer's son, no infrastructures' achievement for the past 2 years of leadership, poor economy in the Philippines, plunging peso value versus the dollar, high inflation, investors are withdrawing from the country, massive corruption is imminent.

    • @Cheesy_Shrek
      @Cheesy_Shrek Месяц назад +1

      No achievement..

    • @fernandocruz4877
      @fernandocruz4877 Месяц назад +4

      You're talking about dilawans. FDI withdrew from PH and went to China and others during the time of dilawans and oligarchs.. Now is coming back. The problem is the 60-40 imposed on FDI. Is is because of the oligarchs and the dilawans.😆😅😂🤣

    • @fkoff7649
      @fkoff7649 Месяц назад

      THAT IS ACCORDING TO THE DUTERTE FANATICS BUT IN REALITY IT'S QUITE THE OPPOSITE. PBBM HAS ACHIEVED LOTS MORE THAN DUTERTE BUT DUTERTE FANATICS CHOSE TO NOT SEE IT BEC THEY ARE STILL DUTERTE DIE HARD FANATICS. STILL NOTHING COMPARED TO THE DUTERTE WHO IS A CHINESE PUPPET WHO WAS A FAILURE IN HIS WAR ON DRUGS, FAILURE IN SOLVING PH CRIMES, FAILURE IN AGRICULTURE, EDUCATION, ECONOMY, BUDGET MANAGEMENT, LOTS OF INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS WERE NOT FINISH, FAILURE IN THE ASSERTION OF THE WEST PH SEA, FAILURE TO END CORRUPTION, IN FACT DUTERTE WAS THE PROTECTOR OF THE BIGGEST CORRUPT POLITICIANS ETC. DUTERTE WAS A BIG FAILURE AND THE WORST PH PRESIDENT SO FAR, NOT TO MENTION HE IS A CRIMINAL AND A MASS MURDERER, HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATOR.

    • @firstknight193
      @firstknight193 Месяц назад +1

      @@Cheesy_Shrek YES NO ACHIEVEMENT!

    • @Punkhazard1292
      @Punkhazard1292 Месяц назад

      ​@@fernandocruz4877you mean during the time of Duterte Administration where US and Australian Business Companies leaving the country?

  • @erniequives7613
    @erniequives7613 Месяц назад +3

    PBBM HAS A POLITICAL ENFLUENCE IN THE REGION AND READY TO DEFEND AND PROTECT OUR SOVEREIGN RIGHTS TO THE AGGRESSOR,HE HAS A POWER TO COUNTER THE MODERN PIRACY ENTRUDERS WITH OUT FEAR TO THIS GIANT COUNTRY.

    • @firstknight193
      @firstknight193 Месяц назад

      WE DON'T HAVE ANY AGGRESSOR! OPEN YOUR MIND... ONLY THE UNITED STATES CREATES MORE AGGRESSORS

  • @dannygilbuena4082
    @dannygilbuena4082 Месяц назад +6

    Well, for me mr. PR, it's better to engage China diplomatically, than spewing fiery rhetotic, that can never be matched by credible military force. The ph's military is one of the weakest in Asia.
    Look at what USA, JAPAN and KOREA is doing, they engage the chinese in a more subtle way, much like taming a powerful dragon to prevent it from breathing fire on them.
    Then you're suggesting that the ph to be more assertive and aggressive it its dealings with the Chinese.
    Look at ASEAN, only the ph is somewhat different.
    Do you think Mr. PR that the ph is now under the leash of your master, or just wanted to be a different kid on the block?
    But why? Is it because of money frozen by the US?
    Sell your stories somewhere else, maybe in the US.
    If you think that bbm is better, it's your choice, but we are not dumb, we know who is the worst.

    • @fernandocruz4877
      @fernandocruz4877 Месяц назад

      The PH was powerful before when the yellowtards took power. It was when CCP encroached our maritime features. PH became nothing when the yellowtards came into power. Elaborate what they had done to the country.

    • @BlinkMoore
      @BlinkMoore Месяц назад

      Lol duterte pro china ipamimigay lang ang WPS won in Arbitral and he said piece of paper are you 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @fernandocruz4877
      @fernandocruz4877 Месяц назад +1

      @@dannygilbuena4082
      CCP is the world? Definitely not the Pulitburo Republic of China.

  • @mollylee4043
    @mollylee4043 Месяц назад +9

    MARFCOS IS MORE MORE BETTER THAN DUTERTE BUILD BETTER MORE BBM

    • @firstknight193
      @firstknight193 Месяц назад +2

      TELL ME WHAT MARCOS HAS BEEN BUILT? IN HIS 2 YEARS

    • @little_qui
      @little_qui Месяц назад +1

      ​@@firstknight193 aren't u watching news? Or r u blind? 😂 kawawa ka namn

    • @liesterminator2
      @liesterminator2 Месяц назад

      Hahaha pingbong is a comedian zelensky of asean whole asean is laughing at Philippines

    • @BlinkMoore
      @BlinkMoore Месяц назад

      ​@@liesterminator2I'm laughing to you 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @liesterminator2
      @liesterminator2 Месяц назад

      @@little_qui when u see a bridge or a airport built do u think the decision or funding to build it can be done within 2 years? Haha

  • @always-fq7yx
    @always-fq7yx Месяц назад

    you mean... Marcos is a better sevant to the evil war imperial?

  • @RagingSovereign
    @RagingSovereign Месяц назад +5

    Better for whom? Better for US and its allies????

    • @romeocivilino6667
      @romeocivilino6667 Месяц назад +4

      Better for the Philippines and it’s own National Interests and National Security that’s being threatened by a Foreign Regional Bully. It’s called the Alignment of Common Interests of the Philippines, it’s Allies, Friends and Partners.

  • @bbaborh
    @bbaborh Месяц назад +3

    China's sovereignty and historic rights in the South China Sea are based on its long-term history of management and administration of the islands in the sea and the adjacent waters. They are also consistent with international law, including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.
    Successive dynasties or governments since the Tang Dynasty (618-907) effectively controlled and administered the South China Sea islands and the related waters. Successive Chinese governments asserted sovereignty over the islands and reefs within the nine-dash line of the South China Sea, as well as developed and managed resources within the line, which constituted exclusive rights to the waters of the South China Sea
    The Chinese have long engaged in fishing and other productive activities in the South China Sea, which is an important waterway for Chinese ships. Since the Han Dynasty (202BC-220AD), they began to make use of the resources of the sea, passing through it. These practices constitute the basic facts of China's long-term administration and passage in the South China Sea.
    The sovereignty has also been recognized by other countries. For a long time after World War II, Vietnam, the Philippines and other neighboring countries did not object to China's sovereignty over the South China Sea islands and the nine-dash line. Many other countries and international organizations also recognized or acquiesced to it. This is supported by a large number of foreign official documents and publications, as well as government archives, including those of Vietnam, the Philippines, the United States, Russia, the United Kingdom, France, Germany and Japan.
    Since the founding of the People's Republic of China in 1949, the Chinese government has exercised sovereignty and jurisdiction over the South China Sea by issuing government documents and diplomatic statements, promulgating domestic laws, asserting sovereignty over the South China Sea with abundant evidence.
    On the other hand, as an illegal claimant in the South China Sea dispute, the Philippines' position has been based on a completely wrong foundation from the beginning. The information provided by the Philippines on the islands and reefs and its claims are full of false information and false descriptions, and there are many inconsistent and self-contradictory statements. The Philippines had never raised territorial claims on the Nansha Islands before the 1970s.
    The nine-dash line, a heritage, is frequently questioned and attacked by the Philippines. In China, the drawing of dotted lines in the South China Sea began in the early 20th century. At that time, the maps compiled by private individuals first used dotted or continuous lines to show China's territory scope in the sea.
    In the 1930s, the government of the Republic of China began to standardize and manage map publishing. They established the Land and Waters Map Review Committee to examine the maps. In January 1935, the committee published the Map of Islands in the South China Sea, standardizing the names of 132 islands, reefs, sands and beaches. This was the first case of the Chinese government officially mapping the South China Sea islands in modern history.
    After World War II, in accordance with the Cairo Declaration, the Potsdam Proclamation and other international legal documents, China resumed the exercise of sovereignty of islands in the South China Sea. In February 1948, the Interior Ministry of the Republic of China publicly issued the Location Map of South China Sea Islands. It was the first time that the Chinese government drew a U-shaped line in the South China Sea on an officially published map, demonstrating to the international community its sovereignty over the sea.
    After 1949, the new Chinese government inherited this line and made appropriate adjustments to make it the nine-dash line we know today.
    From then until the 1970s, the neighboring countries, including the Philippines, and the international community did not raise any objections to China's territorial sovereignty.
    All official maps published by China after 1949 show this line, which clearly defines China's territorial sovereignty over the South China Sea islands within the line and its historic rights in the waters within the line.

    • @romeocivilino6667
      @romeocivilino6667 Месяц назад +1

      What a Trashy Garbage of CCP Farce of Lies and Bullshitry, Don’t spread your Chinese Fictitious Historical Revisionist Claims and CCP Fake Narratives that’s very Imaginary Fake at it’s core and hideously Against Truth, the Real Facts and Contrary to International Law and Common States Diplomatic Norms.

    • @user-rz1wu7ng8w
      @user-rz1wu7ng8w Месяц назад

      China should have submitted evidences of these things you said during the arbitral hearings. Or probably PRChina does not have any proof other than bedside stories or fake claims and narratives. China is a signatory to UNCLOS therefore it is bound. By the way Spratlys and Scarborough Shoal are parts of the Philippines as colony of Spain. Please read about the 1898 Treaty of Paris and the 1900 Treaty of Washington, both between Spain and the US. PRChina recognizes these treaties yet it wants to grab Scarborough Shoal and Spratlys. China did not read these treaties esp. Treaty of Washington or it does not understand the words.

    • @fernandocruz4877
      @fernandocruz4877 Месяц назад

      Open seas of the world is an international waters. No nation claimed an open seas of the world. All nations landlocked and have shores can freely navigate the open seas of the world for trade and commerce. Yes, you can block an open sea of the world in times of war.
      Making a large demarcation on an open sea of the world to the detriment of other nations is like declaring war to the rest of the world.

    • @veerand7038
      @veerand7038 Месяц назад

      tldr

  • @seekersoul3439
    @seekersoul3439 Месяц назад +6

    😂😂😂😂 delusion. There is no such thing as West Philippines Sea. And Marcos is now perceived by ASEAN and neighbour countries, that inclusive of Taiwan too as Karen in the neighbourhood, of nothing good but cause disturbance within the region. Period

    • @nikkovirtucio1899
      @nikkovirtucio1899 Месяц назад

      There’s no such thing as 10-Dash line and One China😂 Taiwan has it’s own government so keep being salty! But you know what’s true? Xi looks like Winniethepoop

    • @lancepalomo8134
      @lancepalomo8134 Месяц назад

      Exactly what a Commie fake china bot would say

    • @user-ct5eu3yd4v
      @user-ct5eu3yd4v Месяц назад

      😂😂😂😂😂hallucination

  • @ryanspinoza6586
    @ryanspinoza6586 Месяц назад +1

    We know Marcos' position is better because China supports Duterte's position, you could even see Xi Jinping smiling gleefully after Duterte meetings with him. He gets what he wants and Duterte goes home with less territory.

  • @dotv8964
    @dotv8964 Месяц назад +3

    This is misinformation 😊

    • @user-zt4wy1lk9k
      @user-zt4wy1lk9k Месяц назад

      truth hurts🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @veerand7038
      @veerand7038 Месяц назад

      chinese people know everything about misinformation because misinformation is all they are being fed

  • @dotv8964
    @dotv8964 Месяц назад

    BBM admin they cant protect the fisherman whoile Duterte admin during his time the fisherman can catch fish in the disputeb area.

    • @Punkhazard1292
      @Punkhazard1292 Месяц назад +1

      In what way the fisherfolks were allowed fo fish in the contested water? In return for what?

    • @JuanTalkPH
      @JuanTalkPH Месяц назад +1

      Wagkang fake news hindi totoo yan

    • @user-zt4wy1lk9k
      @user-zt4wy1lk9k Месяц назад

      oh really you dont seems very aware its all in the news

    • @user-rz1wu7ng8w
      @user-rz1wu7ng8w Месяц назад

      Are you sure?

    • @nexusdues3028
      @nexusdues3028 Месяц назад

      Haha nanonood ka kasi ng mga fake vloggers

  • @danieljosephdelta44semperfi
    @danieljosephdelta44semperfi Месяц назад +1

    So far the only contrast between Marcos and duterte is some of the words they speak that's it

  • @mollylee4043
    @mollylee4043 Месяц назад +5

    MARCOS IS NOT AFRAID TO DEPEND OUR NATION NOT LIKE FORMER PRESIDENT DUTERTE ALWAYS TALKING OF WAR