Multiple failures after departure | Delta Air lines A320 | REAL ATC
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 май 2022
- 27 MAY 2021
A Delta Air Lines Airbus A320 registration N342NW, performing flightDAL1205 from Minneapolis St. Paul International Airport to Baltimore/Washington International Airport. After departure declared an emergency, reported about multiple issues and requested return back to Minneapolis.
If you enjoyed please support channel by subscribing and hitting the notification bell to get notified on new uploads.
Source of communications: www.liveatc.net (usage permission)
#REALATC #ATC #ATCCOMUNICATIONS 
Авто/Мото
The approach controller was incredible, very good communication. Letting them know that there is a similar call sign on the channel is incredible work under stress.
Agreed, we have incredible controllers here
Yes, that struck me too. He needs to train others, this is how it's done well.
Good job, of course. But not really "Incredible work under stress". He did exactly what any controller is trained to do. He's not just ad libbing.
I remain hugely impressed at BOTH Pilots and ATC’s cool calm authority in these circumstances. Hat’s off to you.
I could listen to that pilot all day. Cool, calm, collected.
Thank you for these high quality videos! I love that you zoom into the airport when the aircraft lands! Kudos and keep it up!
Thank you for watching! Stay tuned!🤙
Excellent communication between the pilot and the man at the airport!
Literally from the textbook on both sides, pilot seems to be very experienced and ATC calls and coordination just admirable.
Omg. So scary
Outstanding job by the ATC as well as the pilots! Excellent coordination & communication!
2:33 am I the only one who had to listen to this part again to check if the controller just asked if they had fuel on board? XD
Obviously fuel-on-board is a fixed term in aviation, but as a non-native speaker I just had to laugh so hard about that particular phrasing. I did not know those airlines operated gliders too ;)
Very nice re-creation!! Glad all worked out and they landed safely!! Kudos to all!! 👍✈✈👍
Another fine video, I am glad I stumbled upon your channel. Good work by the crew, ATC, and the airport authority personnel.
Welcome to the channel. Tons of great content here. And a lot of the commenters here actually know what they're talking about.
Good luck. We're all counting on you.
Was on an A320 out of Atlanta couple years ago with a failure to retract of landing gear. Took about 30mins to turn back around and land. Pilot announced the issue 10mins into flight. The remaining 20mins was one of the quietest plane rides I’ve been on, not so much as a whisper from any of the passengers The landing was uneventful thankfully.
great communication!
Such cool professionals everybody.
l liked the way the pilot gave ATC the heads up while he worked through the problems, sometimes when your juggling balls it's difficult to notice your shoe lace is undone.
I'm no pilot but I have attended emergency's at sea as an inshore skipper, once taking an injured sailor off a sail boat so the helicopter could land the hook guy on clear decks, both were hoisted off. The sailor had his nose nearly severed, and after docking we went for a beer and the crew of the sailboat were there. The guys nose was reattached and we got drunk.
On other emergency calls we have changed course and made our way towards the casualty but were stood down en-route. But still had a beer when we docked.
I find juggling my balls to be very painful. How do you do it?
Some of these airports covered her on RUclips seem to have a difficult time getting their act coordinated across various support activities when planes have emergencies. ie. Delta pilot told late in the game that 04 would not be available due to construction.
Hats off to everyone. Especially the pilots, under that amount of stress the copilot(assuming) communicated and was professional the whole time. I’m an Airbus nut, does anybody know what the specific details?
Yeah airbus sucks
Did they get tugged off or not? I was waiting for the happy ending.
Probably when they got home
Me too!
Why would the runway they need have a 30-minute wait? Wouldn’t this emergency take priority over all others?
It might be that the runway is under construction and not usable at the time
@@WarriorTr59 So they started construction on the runway right after the plane took off?? 😆
Wish we had more info on what happened next...
Delta what happened?
I'm quite curious about the technical reasons of those multiple failures.
Any idea? Couldn't find anything on Google (yet).
Based on casual knowledge of the affected systems, it sounds hydraulic in nature
@@outermarker5801 Sounds plausible. But why did the hydraulics fail in the first place?
@@PiepsiPanic Why does any complex system made up of tens of thousands of parts fail?
The important takeaway here is the aircraft remained controllable and landed safely. Why? Multiple hydraulic systems providing resiliency for exact emergency scenarios like this.
Highly recommend V1 Simulations channel. Real world Airbus captain who also loves Flight Simulation. He shares a world of great info on Airbus systems, failure recovery scenarios etc.
@@outermarker5801 Thanks for the tip!
DOnt know the cause, but as i understand it, it was the first flight after maintenance. Sure as shit sounds like a massive hydraulic leak on one of the 3 systems, not fatal in iteself but a pain in the ass none the less, there was also runway contimanition found after the plane landed, but there was nothing to suggest what it was at the time. There will be a report soon enoguh and ill be stupid enough to read em cos i always do
So many armchair specialists with no clue on how things work .. the comments section is the funniest part of internet
Good story
What's involved in "prepping" a runway? Other than telling other planes not to takeoff or land on intersecting runways, what takes 30 minutes?
It sounds like in this case the runway was temporarily closed due to construction work, so likely clearing crew and equipment off the runway. Later in the video ATC states that the runway is unavailable due to construction.
The brakes stopping things are not working 🥴
The A320, just like the rest of the Airbus family, is an electric aircraft. Items are connected to each other in ways that they normally are not, in other aircraft. When something goes wrong, it may affect multiple systems.
This is very reductive and largely inaccurate. You're confusing flight control protection systems with standard ones like electrical, hydraulic, pneumatic and fuel.
In this case, it sounds like a hydraulic system issue. Hydraulics affect multiple functions depending on specific failure - on ANY aircraft.
Ah so it was designed by British Leyland
Don't like fly by wire,glad I'm out of aviation when I did...
7:31 it's called brakes
the brakes were broken, makes then break???
Nahh, they needed to check for time off.
These guys would be so bored with everyday problems.
And do you have fuel on board?
Uhm, hopefully we do. 🤔
😬
The phrase "fuel on board " means, how much fuel on board, not do they have any fuel on board.
They try to pass along an estimated mass of fuel to the fire department. More fuel means you might need more foam.
@@davidhoffman1278 Thanks. I never actually considered why they asked this question. Makes perfect sense.
"Negative, no fuel. We've adopted the Green New Deal and are all solar."
Plot twist. Pilot's name was released later, eneded up being Harrison Ford.
Love it how none of the US pilot use standard and official phraseology.
Enjoy your junk all Airbus fleet Delta.
Pull all a320's from service indefinitely until they can be fixed or have newer updated systems put in place to prevent these types of things from happening ever again
Lolll ALL A320s? For a one-off mechanical issue? Ok. No.
@@CMDRFlyAuburn it's not a one-off it's happened multiple times
@@liammcdermott4112 and every time it’s been due to a different reason. You don’t ground an aircraft every time a new fault appears
@@tomstravels520 you do when there are hundreds of lives at risk in those aircrafts
@@liammcdermott4112 and how many people have died in these landing gear issues? None. This could have been a maintenance issue, the landing gear didn’t rotate 90 degrees and the aircraft had alternate braking available so no problems. Stop overreacting
Runway 4/22 a big taxiway. Not available for an emergency due to construction? What a joke
There are many factors….would you like to land the plane on a freshly laid concrete? Trust me coming from an airport ops standpoint I bet they tried to get the runway reopened but deemed it too dangerous.
Could be a number of things that could prevent it from opening.
Now that the 747 is gone, it's basically a taxiway. They only open it for seasonal, oddball winds.
Thank you for your input, Oh Lord of the Apes.
Ill freely admit i might be wrong here, but im pritty sure 4/22 was shut because they found massive cracks in the touchdown zones
What is it with US pilots; its Pan or Mayday not just 'an emergency', which means nothing to ATC and ground. Declaring Pan or Mayday, with the appropriate additional information, saves time and gets you the right priority against other traffic. I use these US pilots ATC communications to teach my aviation students what NOT to do and say.
Iam a retired ATCS from the USA and i understood exactly what EMERGENCY means and so dose every ATCS in the USA, looks like this controller knew it too
Good for you Bob. Now STFU and go away. No one cares about your stunning professionalism and CFI. They declared an emergency quite clearly. ATC knew immediately what they needed, why do you think he asked them right off the bat about SOBs? These guys had their plate quite full don't you think? They got it back on the ground without hurting anyone.
I bet a lawyer has something to do with it somewhere...
Declaring an "emergency" is standard here, and it is crystal clear to ATC and ground. Not to mention they will ask "are you declaring an emergency". So no, it is not wrong at all, and sounds like you need to do a better job of instructing if you think someone declaring an emergency "means nothing".
@@drumsoccer100 Its not ICAO standard and not practiced, or taught, that way in any other Authorities. Sounds like you are one more arrogant know all who does not understand what the international aviation standards actually mean.