Lol, this is just a documentary. The fact that were not allowed to compliment russia for basically having a working military industry says much about you nafo bots
Lol you're not even russian to speak so. That was a decision on the ground on the front the same way m4 Sherman tank crewman made their own variations of Shermans to cut through hedgerows Fpv is new and so a response be it small in scale or extreme was expected
@@strizhi6717 it's not something done against the command's wishes, though. In WW2 the commanders said expressly, that any tank with those modifications was supposed to remove them. Same with the Bradleys in Irak, because it didn't offer any additional protection against anti tank weapons and made the vehicles slower, more prone to get stuck and made an easier target. Thus reducing the survivability. Additionally, if it were, like the Sherman or Bradley modifications from the troops, we wouldn't see Russian propaganda channels picking up on it and filming the production and touting it as the best thing since sliced bread. And remember, what we see from the Russian propaganda is what Putin wants us to see. Also the turtle tanks are mostly tanks out of deep storage without the ability to shoot their main gun. I've seen only one video where the turret was able to move, minimally and not one where they were shooting. The way I've seen these tanks be used is in troop transportation and breaching trenches as the first tank, with anti mine and drone equipment, followed by normal tanks. They definitely have their use, but don't delude yourself, that this is the end all be all and the Russians aren't searching for a better solution for drones and the reality on the front.
@@strizhi6717also, a weird way of gatekeeping. Racism is strong in you apparently. Also can't Ukrainians talk about the war, since they aren't russians? So in your mind, you can't say anything about this war, ups, "three day special military operation", if you aren't russian? Can't talk about a war in Ukraine, supported by Europe, north and south America, Asia, Africa, Australia and the middle east? A war that is affecting everyone living in this world, because a maniac wants to have the borders of the Soviet Union and is threatening nuklear annihilation if he can't have his way. Great logic. Really, you should go into politics and run against putin. You'd do great!
@@strizhi6717the turret tossing competition is sacrificing a lot of tank crews that take quite some time to replace, literally everything with Russia is purely cannon fodder
They never said that, and it aint that complex or heavy, oh yeah and btw, how much armor bradley has? the armata has over a meter of frontal armor, just so you know how better it is.
@@TUD22141cool, how many T-14s have seen combat? How many have they produced? How many have broken down during there parade? Now how many Bradley have been produced,
People asking why theyre not in service is because armata is not in service and it's based on armata. War has changed and armata is no longer as useful as previously planned. So now they focus on other areas such as drone warfare because the tank is no longer as crucial to overall warfare
I would disagree, war is all about numbers, armata is costly complicated in production it is better to produce two T90 than single armata during that war
@@o6321 lol war is not all about numbers. At best war is about logistics. But certainly not numbers. Outnumbered armies have won hundreds of battles. I mean the Russians on that basis shouldn't be years into this war, they significantly outnumber the Ukrainians and yet Ukraine just invaded Russia. China for example is actively reducing the size of its army. It's army in the 90s was over twice as large as the one now. And that army was itself before about a million and half men were cut. They cut one million in 1985 alone They did this so they could afford to increase the quality of training and equipment per soldier. They went from 10 million soldiers in 1984 to 2 million today. So let's not be silly.
@@sparkzbarcaне будьте глупыми вы. Война на украине - типичная война капиталистов. Обе стороны сокращают своё население, а правительство набивает карманы.
The Russian Army definitely needs this kind of heavily protected IFV in Ukraine now but not a single T-15 was introduced to the frontline. You can deduce from that yourself.
Because the T-14 and T-15 were meant to be produced at Uralvagonzavod, which is currently the only operational tank factory in Russia, which makes T-90's from scratch. To change the production to a bulkier and heavier vehicle would take a significant expense and time. If Uralvagonzavod stopped producing tanks to change production, the Russians for some considerable time would remain only with the Omsktransmash factory, which is currently only able to modernize T-80's, but at least they're planning to restart the production of it. In addition there are Armor Repair Plants, which repair and modernize T-62's, T-72's and T-80's
@@dr.mortem6050 I doubt they would let armata series touch the Ukrainian soil even at the back, since they already have fuckin billions of old T series tanks and IFV’s that are enough to deal with Ukraine.
@@dr.mortem6050 these things are so riddled with major mechanical and technical problems, that they are not able to be used outside of army trial courses
It would be easily outmaneuvered and destroyed. “ like all tanks and IFVs” But we all gotta admit it’s a pretty cool platform. Its not something you wanna be spotted by first
The Armata Universal Combat Platform or vehicle family just looks downright cool. Everybody wondering why we aren't seeing them in use forgets that there are older stocks yet to be spent. Can't wait to see these as the new standard.
what you forget is that when you lose a tank, the chances of loosing the crew are pretty high too, particularly when its a fuckin T-72, T-62 or T-55 even if what you say is true (it aint) then youd have no experienced crews left AT ALL after the old stock is gone, making the T-14 VERY vulnerable to basically everything if the T-14 was actually in production and functioning we wouldve seen it in ukraine, but guess what, we havent remember what happened when the AK-15 was supposed to be the new standard? same shits gonna happen with the T-14, not anywhere near enough of them, even if theyre sent to the battlefield
@just1moro168 What would be the reactions of the world (Russians included) when they see the brand new russian vehicle (inevitably) destroyed on the battlefield? That would be a terrible ad for the vehicle. That's also another reason as to why they don't use it. In a world of social media where people care more about looks than facts, they prefer not to look like they are losing (which losing this vehicle would indicate).
@@chewbacca3269 what do you think is more humiliating, losing a couple T-14s or sending T-62s and T-55s to fight in their place in fucking 2024 while claiming to be more capable than NATO (they aint)
@just1moro168 Losing the pinnacle of their tank technology would be more humiliating. Look at how they use the use the destruction of just a couple of abrams as if they have achieved full victory. It's not humiliating to lose old tankbto brand new ATGMs or small drones. But it will be humiliating to lose a brand new tank to an fpv drone worth a couple thousand dollars. That's most likely their thought process if they indeed have the Armatas ready.
@@chewbacca3269 well for one, they just dont have it ready, the only really working ones are part of the parade unit there also really isnt anything that could humiliate russia even further, theyve literally already been humiliated in every single aspect of their invasion at least once also, if this is the way that russian commanders think then they wouldve just not started the damn war since by your logic, anything thats somewhat new and is lost is equal to the president shitting his pants on stage
@@alphanomad511 I do, I know far too much about armored vehicles, this thing is too big, has too little armor for its size, and is relatively slow. This is not something for fighting any other carrier/IFV
That's why i think they will not adopt it. They tend to go with ighter ifv so they will end up modernizing BMP3 like the Manul or something else of similar weight.
@@polduran That's always how Russian military equipment has been. Every time an engineer has a good idea and presents it, a dozen prototypes get made, then its scrapped for a "cheaper" alternative
@@polduran Except its far worse in Russia. The prototype AK-12 for example was designed to work amazingly with suppressors and optics, was far more ergonomical, as well as fire thousands of rounds without issues. I can't 100% remember, but if I remember correctly, it was cheaper than the production model AK-12, but was "too expensive when we have Ak-74s left over". Like 5 years later, they make the Ak-12 based off the esoteric ass AK-400, which is literally just an AK-74m with a tiny bit of aftermarket parts. Rather than being a new rifle, its just an AK-74 with a bad fire selector, gas block that just rusts out, and can't be replaced, and rails that don't hold zero
@@y0h0p38 yeah i completely agree. The AK-12 in service is a complete failure. The only upgrade is the top rail, and maybe the quick detach flash hider. In a perfect world they would've adopted the AKV-521 which definitely addresses all the weaknesses of the AK-74M.
@@petervrana9625 So basically I am right in saying that it's not exactly the same châssis as the armor placement, the entry exit hatch/Doors, enging and chassis height/dimensions are not the same.
@@glenndrach1139 I'm talking about Russia has a long history of warfare they are always improving look for example early days of Ukraine war everybody thought Russia was going to lose yet 2 years later the Russians have the momentum on their side
@@JDDC-tq7qmyou mean in history generally? Or rather the last 100 years? Like in the Russo Japanese war? Or WW1 maybe? Or the Sochi conflict? Maybe the Latvian war of independence? Or the Estonian war of independence? Oh, maybe you mean the Lithuanian Soviet war. Or the Georgian Ossetian conflict. The Polish Soviet war? Or the Urtatagi conflict? Or the red army intervention in Afghanistan? Their involvement in the Spanish civil war on the losing side? Or WW2, when they only survived because of American aid. Or maybe the Vlora incident? The second Soviet Afghan war? The first chechien war? Btw, if you didn't realize it, this is the list, of defeats of Russians and Soviets in the last 100 years. Your assumption, that they're going to win, it's just a matter of time, is just foolish.
Better to have 2 T90 than 1 T14/T15 This is why they aren't making them. If the tank factory had to switch from T90 to T14/15 it would stop producing tanks for several months and the new models would cost a lot more and be slower to manufacture. So now russia needs a lot of tanks for the war and the improvements are too limited to justify reducing production
theres nothing crazy about russian tech, this is terrible for being an IFV, way too heavy, way too immobile and doesnt have any better armament than a modernised bradley from the 80s
@@just1moro168 really? i see trends during cold war when westerner tend to lacks when it comes to how crazy soviet engineering could be with their equipment. too bad they aint rich enough to do all that 😌
@@rave.201 ima just remind you that said "westerners" pulled of operation desert storm, had the best tanks in the world all the way from the early 80s to today, still have absolute air dominance and have everybody and their mothers buying their weapons because they are the best theres nothing crazy about soviet engineering other than some unconventional choices due to differences in doctrine and a lot of very overhyped prototypes, which the "westerners" also have plenty of
Si no tienen ya ni para las retiradas que pueden hacer esos Nazi Ucranianos? O ya se, matar gente y quemar edificios con gente adentro como lo hacían a las minorias en el 2014, solo hay pueden usar los Javelins.
Honestly this would be great for a command vehicle, I don’t support the Russians but command vehicles are important in an army usually when you lose a command center you break the back of the frontlines and that’s why so many armies fail when their lines are broken they’re often left broke of contact with other battalions losing cohesion.
It doesn't really matter for Russian forces anyways. They don't really have officers on the ground, there aren't really any NCOs, just soldiers getting told what to do on the radio. That's why there's a lack of discipline in the Russian military, as well as unorganized attacks. Russian equipment isn't even that bad, and Soviets made mindbogglingly high amounts of every piece of ammo or armor. Russia should be winning in Ukraine realistically, just they don't utilize their assets
@y0h0p38 All of what you're saying was true in 2022 and the beginning of 2023, but judging on the situation on the front I'd say the Russians have learned and adapted to their mistakes.
It is not nice to say something like that. I'm sure Russian tankers will not be running over flowerbeds of Ukranian cemeteries. Please respect the fallen Ukranian soldiers.
@@kroolis77to by nie była atrapa ,ale większość elektroniki jest z zachodu. Mogą podmienić na im dostępna, ale jakosc będzie gorsza.Nie wiadomo tez jak z świadomością sytulacyjna załogi. Mozliwe ze to ślepiec, lub prawie ślepy pojazd .
@@y.m.9277 Yeah the Namer IFV is indeed the heaviest IFV in existence right now. But it is only 1 existing prototype of the Namer IFV. All the other vehicles are just APC variants without autocanon The IFV variant of the Namer is indeed very formidable, on the same level as the T14 Armata IFV. They are both equally good, but they are still only prototypes
Paper tiger. How long do you think that would last in Ukraine? How many have been produced? I noticed that the top speed and cost per unit wasn't mentioned. I guess that Putin has gotten a new taxi because I know about the likelihood of that ever being used to move russian troops about at the front.
@@ignacio3890 on paper weeeeee, it'll be 30 years before Russia ever deploys equipment with that kind of technology. Its easier for them to barbaricly throw body's at their targets until they run out of ammo.
@@ignacio3890I don’t think many people understand how much harder it was to develop a system like Afganit to engage APFSDS rounds compared to western Trophy and Iron Fist systems. Trophy has advantages when it comes to engaging threats in the rear and from high angles of attack….Afganit has the advantage with multiple attacks from the forward 180 arc and with high velocity APFSDS rounds. Trophy excels in asymmetric environments, Afganit is optimized for anti-tank engagements. Realistically both systems will likely be redesigned following the lessons learned from the war in Ukraine. One thing I will say though, if I were dismounted infantry I’d prefer the Afganit system since it’s less likely to turn accompanying troops into Swiss cheese.
@@Matt-yg8ub Yes, but russia had the arena m ... they can mix the interceptor rounds The prousa fanboy crew can't Understand the technollogy of the t15.
@24kpullhmm time will tell and Russian government is very corrupt so let’s see if they can actually make the thing first lol for all we know it’s garbage
@@thetwotones232 not really if you don't have a factory available for mass production it's not a design flaw. Usually many countries either create entire new assembly lines or remodel old ones
@@thetwotones232 hey did you know that importing exists, thats what most countries do to get microchips... thermal sights for example are nearly NEVER produced domestically
Russia is great at convincing people that it has new advanced technology when it only ever has about 3. There are 7 SU-57’s and 11 T-14’s. There are even less of these and they will never see combat because they’re not actually combat capable vehicles. 95% of Russian “new tech” is paper tech. At best it can TECHNICALLY work (see the Kinzhal which is a “hypersonic missile”, AKA a ballistic missile modified to be put on a bomber), and at worst it never sees combat and is forgotten (like the Soviet laser tank or the Object 292). The other 5% is something that the rest of the world already had, like the Ratnik kit being such an improvement for Russian infantry to finally start getting issued actual body armor in 2015 (and without all the rest that was promised, like portable thermal vision and Russian variant GPS “GLONASS”).
how about ak-47? t34 tank? t64? mig 15? t72? Lancet drones? oh man what could i tell you.. my history told me that russia has enough track record proving itself with pioneering engineering in its own aspects. U can say the same for western military technology advertisements and concepts man. stop being a NAFO bot, in reality this t15 thing is just gonna be an average IFV like the Bradley or BMD's just with improved ERA and trophy system. even t72 has destroyed a m1 abrams in Ukraine so idt russian technology is that far behind and all of this is a PR stunt for the russian public. if everything from the t72 in the 1980's shown as the equivalent to the t-14 we have today like as a propaganda stunt then russia would be effectively still be fighting with t64's till now since every advancement russia gas made in the military sector "is just another piece of shit", say that to the ak-47 man 😅
@@evananthony1395AK-47 was a piece of shit which is why it was quickly revamped into the AK-74M and then the AKM and then into the AK-74. T-64 was revolutionary but was too troublesome to maintain, expensive, unreliability issues, and too slow to manufacture in war time which is why the T-72 was invented as a replacement to the main Soviet tank fleet. The T-14 and T-15 Armata will suffer the exact same fate of the T-64 but 100x worse. Too expensive, too unreliable, too complex, too hard to maintain, too slow to produce even in peacetime. Lancet isn’t hard to make since it’s just a beefed up Maverick FPV drone. T-34 and MiG-15 are accomplishments of the past which the Russian Federation is no longer capable of so why bother bringing them up. And no a T-72 has not destroyed an Abrams in Ukraine. It was an FPV drone which is the main tank killer of the war.
@@Googles23m 1st: ak-47 is a piece of shit? enlighten me how, it surely is more reliable than that m14a1 and far more simpler to produce 2nd: t-65 was not expensive, ur shitting information out of ur ass rn. its the world most bought and imported tank for a reason, its also why most of the third world country with minimal military budget buy them because of they relatively cheap maintanance and spareparts. and no its not hard to produce during wartime. its literally the t34 of MBT's, in the other hand Leporads, centurions and m60 has all of the things u mentioned but luckily those who have them r rich countries with military budget to maintain the superior quality though would never outproduce t64's. 3rd: again ur shitting information out of ur ass, theres a reason why russia have the most tanks in their arsenal. doesnt it correlate to how easy it is to produce and maintain 12,000 tanks in their storage without much struggle? and no the t14 and t15 will be the future gen tanks that will fight against next gen nato tanks, of course its not polished but we will never knoe their performance since it has never been battle tested. 4th: "lancet drones are just beefed up mavericks" doesnt revolutionary technology is just beefed up old technology but cheaper or more effective than the predecessors in the way people havent thought of? example the stg44 by nazi Germany is basically a beefed up mp-40 with rifle bullets giving birth to the assault rifle class and being the Father of all assault weapons there is right now. 5th: dont be a NAFO bot, it dont support russia but its irritating for you people to just shit anything anti-russian out of your mouth, if its always the case that you'll say then everything that NATO sent to ukraine will demolish all those "shit & obselete" Russian equipment while being unschated. in reality? pumas, bradley, stryer, and now even a leopard has been captured by russian forces. proves how there is always a degree in which even the shittiest army by the media is able to have some degree of effectiveness.
@@evananthony1395The T34 needed American lend lease machine tools to manufacture the barrel, and the mig 15 used British engines, the ak47 was also designed by the same German who who designed the stg44 who was captured at the end of the war and forced to work in the kalishnikov factory.
Heavier than Maxxpro and MRAP. More stable at top speed though. If the T-15 can cross water it's the better vehicle. Update this video with horsepower numbers.
I really wonder how everyone is gonna counter drones in the future. It doesn't seem like jamming tech in the battlefield has reached its peak or else this thing will be as good as a million dollar modern art piece somewhere.
Oh yeah the world's heaviest tank is totally not going to sink into the Ukrainian soil 😅 you think just because you spray paint junkyard metal it magically turns it into a fighting vehicle!?
I coulda swore these things saw some combat trials in Ukraine at the end of 2022. Turns out that having a big, heavy and fuel thirst IFV puts alot of strain on supply lines and it was found that the weapons station was poorly armored which meant it was vulnerable to the most basic forms of anti tank munitions. Turns out having tracks in an urban environment where mines and enemy infantry can ambush you from any angles leaves this thing particularly vulnerable
It’s really not a good ifv. Obviously on paper it’s one of the best but the addition frontal protection against main battle tank rounds shouldn’t be necessary in an ifv. It’s not made to destroy tanks and it just makes it more expensive.
What about price, the price is in labour.. They have near unlimited natural resources, with time they can make as many as they want. Logistics and modular mass produced platforms like the t72 have been very effective so far.
Because they don't need the t14 or t15 on the battlefield because there winning the t90m and t80bvm t72b3 are doing fine whats the point in putting the t14 or any new tech up against an iferior foe and potentially giving up its secrets sounds a smart move to me.
Pretty cool tank, interesting to see how it will do in the future if Russia is still in its war against Ukraine. Hopefully the comments aren’t filled with Tank and Engineering experts that know apparently know everything about Russia and its military secrets n what not… hopefully.
The main problem is that it's heavy and uses a T-14 chassis, so it would guzzle fuel, and it's heavy so it would get stuck a lot, and price for these would be very expensive
@@dannycage8672 yes, the puma C is. But given that’s not the empty mass of the vehicle. The T15s empty mass is 44 tons empty. And while I can’t speak on the effectiveness of the puma, the Bradly performs exceedingly well when used properly. The issue of having extra armor is that you need a larger engine, transmission, and tracks to achieve the same speed and ground pressure of other IFVs, which leads to even more weight, which means more fuel needs to be burned. All this considering Russias current supply line issues means it cannot be used for the deep in scouting missions IFVs are usually used for. Ok? Sorry for the rant.
@@topaz2821 lol, the Bradley was just proven to vulnerable to anything and a bad vehicle overall slow and underpowered engine, Puma look promising but the thing is, heavy IFVs are about to become the new tanks as tanks will become more of a tank on tank combat vehicles
![Quando Rondo - Life Goes On [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/eIf3fhMXAow/mqdefault.jpg)
Basement guy might be looking at it for next update in warthunder.
Ahh yes,another soul lost to The Snail
😅😅😅😅😅
It looks like a 2s38, with armour, bmp-2m missiles and hard kill aps if this ever drops in war thunder it will be 15.0 br
@@everblades4fr😭
@@everblades4 seems balanced at 4.3
Most of the comments are either propaganda supporting the Russians or Propaganda against Russia lol. In reality this thing would probably be average.
Tank armor Ifv is better than normal ones
And russin things are better then average
Lol, this is just a documentary. The fact that were not allowed to compliment russia for basically having a working military industry says much about you nafo bots
Stop being an asshole and just listen to the documentary
nah mate, this thing is ass, this is literal 1945 germany engineering.
The smartest person in his room has spoken, listen to him...@@democracy_enjoyer
What we were promised
What we got ~ barn turtle tanks
Lol you're not even russian to speak so. That was a decision on the ground on the front the same way m4 Sherman tank crewman made their own variations of Shermans to cut through hedgerows
Fpv is new and so a response be it small in scale or extreme was expected
@@strizhi6717 it's not something done against the command's wishes, though. In WW2 the commanders said expressly, that any tank with those modifications was supposed to remove them. Same with the Bradleys in Irak, because it didn't offer any additional protection against anti tank weapons and made the vehicles slower, more prone to get stuck and made an easier target. Thus reducing the survivability.
Additionally, if it were, like the Sherman or Bradley modifications from the troops, we wouldn't see Russian propaganda channels picking up on it and filming the production and touting it as the best thing since sliced bread. And remember, what we see from the Russian propaganda is what Putin wants us to see.
Also the turtle tanks are mostly tanks out of deep storage without the ability to shoot their main gun. I've seen only one video where the turret was able to move, minimally and not one where they were shooting.
The way I've seen these tanks be used is in troop transportation and breaching trenches as the first tank, with anti mine and drone equipment, followed by normal tanks. They definitely have their use, but don't delude yourself, that this is the end all be all and the Russians aren't searching for a better solution for drones and the reality on the front.
@@strizhi6717also, a weird way of gatekeeping. Racism is strong in you apparently. Also can't Ukrainians talk about the war, since they aren't russians?
So in your mind, you can't say anything about this war, ups, "three day special military operation", if you aren't russian? Can't talk about a war in Ukraine, supported by Europe, north and south America, Asia, Africa, Australia and the middle east? A war that is affecting everyone living in this world, because a maniac wants to have the borders of the Soviet Union and is threatening nuklear annihilation if he can't have his way. Great logic. Really, you should go into politics and run against putin. You'd do great!
Tutel 🐢
@@strizhi6717the turret tossing competition is sacrificing a lot of tank crews that take quite some time to replace, literally everything with Russia is purely cannon fodder
The funding was turned into superyachts truly revolutionary
Worthless junk. No procuction capacity. On top of a hopeless unit
John Kerry of the democratic party is the only one that lies about his yachts.
@@smaho27and still better than the Bradley
@@Craig-fl8jj literally no one believes that. Especially not the t90 operators that got butchered by the Bradley
@@smaho27 ok bot
Russia: Pathetic Western weapons are too complicated, too heavy and easy to break down
Also Russia: make this
Russia hates western weapons cause they cant afford to make them
They never said that, and it aint that complex or heavy, oh yeah and btw, how much armor bradley has? the armata has over a meter of frontal armor, just so you know how better it is.
@@TUD22141cool, how many T-14s have seen combat? How many have they produced? How many have broken down during there parade? Now how many Bradley have been produced,
@@TUD22141 If the Armata were simple and easy to produce, there would be thousands of them by now
@@xaina222 nope, its just bc its still under development and getting upgrades (the same reason for all the new russian things btw)
Vive la grande Russie
Vive la france! Vive l’armee de la france! 🇫🇷❤
When does this grande Russia enter the chat?
All I see is aging, corrupt, ill, dysfunctional kleptocracy Russia.
SLAVA UKRAINI 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦
People asking why theyre not in service is because armata is not in service and it's based on armata. War has changed and armata is no longer as useful as previously planned. So now they focus on other areas such as drone warfare because the tank is no longer as crucial to overall warfare
So a bit of failure then.
I would disagree, war is all about numbers, armata is costly complicated in production it is better to produce two T90 than single armata during that war
@@o6321 lol war is not all about numbers.
At best war is about logistics. But certainly not numbers. Outnumbered armies have won hundreds of battles.
I mean the Russians on that basis shouldn't be years into this war, they significantly outnumber the Ukrainians and yet Ukraine just invaded Russia.
China for example is actively reducing the size of its army. It's army in the 90s was over twice as large as the one now. And that army was itself before about a million and half men were cut. They cut one million in 1985 alone
They did this so they could afford to increase the quality of training and equipment per soldier.
They went from 10 million soldiers in 1984 to 2 million today.
So let's not be silly.
@@hastekulvaati9681 У России есть Т-90М, а у запада - большой провал. Не танки, а консервы которые дронами уничтожаются за 500$)
@@sparkzbarcaне будьте глупыми вы. Война на украине - типичная война капиталистов. Обе стороны сокращают своё население, а правительство набивает карманы.
Not gonna lie, this ifv is actually impressive and good looking🔥
Probably like 3 units produced and most of the funding disappeared into someone's pockets.😂
Cope
@@muhammadluqman3452cope about non-corruption in a country ruled by a thief
@@espada_i_dagaidk man pretty sure the west has stolen a ton
@@muhammadluqman3452 typical zero IQ reply
@@espada_i_dagaRuled by a thief but it's country is far better that yours 😂😂😂
It's a little too heavy for me but can't say anything until we saw it in real action
Too heavy for you? 😂
@@movietrailers6149Try lifting it by yourself big boy
😂 I can't, it's too heavy
like the new german tank . The heaviest of all tanks or similar to this one if not heavier.
@@Animal.CUT...newest German tank is actually light
The Russian Army definitely needs this kind of heavily protected IFV in Ukraine now but not a single T-15 was introduced to the frontline. You can deduce from that yourself.
Because the T-14 and T-15 were meant to be produced at Uralvagonzavod, which is currently the only operational tank factory in Russia, which makes T-90's from scratch. To change the production to a bulkier and heavier vehicle would take a significant expense and time.
If Uralvagonzavod stopped producing tanks to change production, the Russians for some considerable time would remain only with the Omsktransmash factory, which is currently only able to modernize T-80's, but at least they're planning to restart the production of it. In addition there are Armor Repair Plants, which repair and modernize T-62's, T-72's and T-80's
And Russia don't want their new weapons to be in hands of the enemy. So even if they field it , it will be on the rear.
@@dr.mortem6050 I doubt they would let armata series touch the Ukrainian soil even at the back, since they already have fuckin billions of old T series tanks and IFV’s that are enough to deal with Ukraine.
@@dr.mortem6050 these things are so riddled with major mechanical and technical problems, that they are not able to be used outside of army trial courses
@@zhufortheimpaler4041you are falling for and repeating the propaganda
Bradley is waiting for you
Bradley has proven very average
@@hoggarththewisesmeagol8362 Well, lol Bradley is from 1981. average is pretty good
@@squeegee7 Is that why Ukraine is running out of them?
@@squeegee7 Is that why Ukraine is running out of them?
@@hoggarththewisesmeagol8362 ?
It would be easily outmaneuvered and destroyed. “ like all tanks and IFVs” But we all gotta admit it’s a pretty cool platform. Its not something you wanna be spotted by first
+ RASSIA NUCLEAR POOWER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The Armata Universal Combat Platform or vehicle family just looks downright cool. Everybody wondering why we aren't seeing them in use forgets that there are older stocks yet to be spent. Can't wait to see these as the new standard.
what you forget is that when you lose a tank, the chances of loosing the crew are pretty high too, particularly when its a fuckin T-72, T-62 or T-55
even if what you say is true (it aint) then youd have no experienced crews left AT ALL after the old stock is gone, making the T-14 VERY vulnerable to basically everything
if the T-14 was actually in production and functioning we wouldve seen it in ukraine, but guess what, we havent
remember what happened when the AK-15 was supposed to be the new standard? same shits gonna happen with the T-14, not anywhere near enough of them, even if theyre sent to the battlefield
@just1moro168 What would be the reactions of the world (Russians included) when they see the brand new russian vehicle (inevitably) destroyed on the battlefield? That would be a terrible ad for the vehicle. That's also another reason as to why they don't use it. In a world of social media where people care more about looks than facts, they prefer not to look like they are losing (which losing this vehicle would indicate).
@@chewbacca3269 what do you think is more humiliating, losing a couple T-14s or sending T-62s and T-55s to fight in their place in fucking 2024 while claiming to be more capable than NATO (they aint)
@just1moro168 Losing the pinnacle of their tank technology would be more humiliating. Look at how they use the use the destruction of just a couple of abrams as if they have achieved full victory. It's not humiliating to lose old tankbto brand new ATGMs or small drones. But it will be humiliating to lose a brand new tank to an fpv drone worth a couple thousand dollars. That's most likely their thought process if they indeed have the Armatas ready.
@@chewbacca3269 well for one, they just dont have it ready, the only really working ones are part of the parade unit
there also really isnt anything that could humiliate russia even further, theyve literally already been humiliated in every single aspect of their invasion at least once
also, if this is the way that russian commanders think then they wouldve just not started the damn war since by your logic, anything thats somewhat new and is lost is equal to the president shitting his pants on stage
Russia ahead of USA in wartech least a decade!
Big ass target, additionally, it seems they take heavy inspiration from the Begleitpanzer 57 AIFSV
People say that but then mock the tiny tanks and vehicles that get their turret blown off into space.
@@chewbacca3269 I’m a fan of low profile vehicles, with composite armor rather than relying on ERA, this thing accomplishes none of that
@@Sillygoose2217im sure you know so much arm chair general
@@alphanomad511 I do, I know far too much about armored vehicles, this thing is too big, has too little armor for its size, and is relatively slow. This is not something for fighting any other carrier/IFV
@@Sillygoose2217 Basically just the Leclerc then. Even then, the lecler has Era integrated to the composite armor.
The master of the battlefields
Good IFV but too expansive
That's why i think they will not adopt it. They tend to go with ighter ifv so they will end up modernizing BMP3 like the Manul or something else of similar weight.
@@polduran That's always how Russian military equipment has been. Every time an engineer has a good idea and presents it, a dozen prototypes get made, then its scrapped for a "cheaper" alternative
@@y0h0p38 that's the case for almost all countries in the west. Except Russia is on a very tight budget while having to protect the largest territory.
@@polduran Except its far worse in Russia. The prototype AK-12 for example was designed to work amazingly with suppressors and optics, was far more ergonomical, as well as fire thousands of rounds without issues. I can't 100% remember, but if I remember correctly, it was cheaper than the production model AK-12, but was "too expensive when we have Ak-74s left over". Like 5 years later, they make the Ak-12 based off the esoteric ass AK-400, which is literally just an AK-74m with a tiny bit of aftermarket parts.
Rather than being a new rifle, its just an AK-74 with a bad fire selector, gas block that just rusts out, and can't be replaced, and rails that don't hold zero
@@y0h0p38 yeah i completely agree. The AK-12 in service is a complete failure. The only upgrade is the top rail, and maybe the quick detach flash hider. In a perfect world they would've adopted the AKV-521 which definitely addresses all the weaknesses of the AK-74M.
RASSIA Mlitary poower!!!
That backdoor seems a little light to me....
How could you tell?
@@smokenfire time to play captain obvious huh! By watching the video ist the answer!
@smokenfire dude opened it as easy as a car door that's how. If you been in any kind of heavy armored vehicles you know they are heavy af😂
@@kavaldevereux3111 I somehow missed that part..
@@philalex4811 if it is proofed against small arms i dont see the issue
The entire Armata line is being reconsidered in light of changes in the battle space……namely drones
That's why they have been made with protection in mind.
You know why ifvs aren't build on tank chassis? Because its stupid idea, they have less space, are needlessly heavy and need more fuel.
I don't think it is the same châssis. It has a similar build but it's not exactly the same chassis
@@chewbacca3269 no, its the same chassis. thats what the T-15 is based upon
The Kurganets is also based on the the armata chassis, but its around 25 tons. This is designed for different roles probably
@@petervrana9625 So basically I am right in saying that it's not exactly the same châssis as the armor placement, the entry exit hatch/Doors, enging and chassis height/dimensions are not the same.
it's based on a similar chassis but it is not exactly the same
Russia is on the Wright side of history ❤️🇷🇺
Делали Армату.. Получился Мангал)))
Looks cool, but does it work well? Is the ammo real?
The Russians are always evolving when it comes to warfare ⚔ 🔥
Wtf are you talking about?
@@glenndrach1139 I'm talking about Russia has a long history of warfare they are always improving look for example early days of Ukraine war everybody thought Russia was going to lose yet 2 years later the Russians have the momentum on their side
i like the Turtle Tank Russias Top TECH TANK
@@xorti2282 it's a way to counter the Ukrainian drones looks pretty bizarre but it works I guess
@@JDDC-tq7qmyou mean in history generally? Or rather the last 100 years? Like in the Russo Japanese war? Or WW1 maybe? Or the Sochi conflict? Maybe the Latvian war of independence? Or the Estonian war of independence? Oh, maybe you mean the Lithuanian Soviet war. Or the Georgian Ossetian conflict. The Polish Soviet war? Or the Urtatagi conflict?
Or the red army intervention in Afghanistan? Their involvement in the Spanish civil war on the losing side? Or WW2, when they only survived because of American aid. Or maybe the Vlora incident? The second Soviet Afghan war? The first chechien war? Btw, if you didn't realize it, this is the list, of defeats of Russians and Soviets in the last 100 years. Your assumption, that they're going to win, it's just a matter of time, is just foolish.
Better to have 2 T90 than 1 T14/T15
This is why they aren't making them.
If the tank factory had to switch from T90 to T14/15 it would stop producing tanks for several months and the new models would cost a lot more and be slower to manufacture.
So now russia needs a lot of tanks for the war and the improvements are too limited to justify reducing production
imagine russian crazy tech, combine with germany discipline, run by American vast money. damn
theres nothing crazy about russian tech, this is terrible for being an IFV, way too heavy, way too immobile and doesnt have any better armament than a modernised bradley from the 80s
@@just1moro168 really? i see trends during cold war when westerner tend to lacks when it comes to how crazy soviet engineering could be with their equipment. too bad they aint rich enough to do all that 😌
@@rave.201 ima just remind you that said "westerners" pulled of operation desert storm, had the best tanks in the world all the way from the early 80s to today, still have absolute air dominance and have everybody and their mothers buying their weapons because they are the best
theres nothing crazy about soviet engineering other than some unconventional choices due to differences in doctrine and a lot of very overhyped prototypes, which the "westerners" also have plenty of
@@just1moro168 nope. money well invested. that. imagine if the soviets were to had vast money too
The us has better tech btw
Pretty ❤
So pretty never be sold 😂😂
Well not yet I heard by 2027
@@johnnyrodriguez1090 🤣🤣🤣2327 you mean they can't afford make them
@@johnnyrodriguez1090 thought they sent them to front line in Ukraine show how great they were in battle
@@duanemarshall1889 nah why would do that if the T-80s are doing perfectly fine & ok if that’s ya think 🤷♂️
@@johnnyrodriguez1090 u think they are doing great 🤣🤣🤣
Ukrainian soldiers send this to scrap.
What about abrams and leoapard?
They're making T90's become new VDV transport@@sirex9244
Ukrainien walkingdead?
Can't, because armata is a wondewaffe like panzer XIII
@@espada_i_daga so abrams x and kf51 too?
its the best ifv in the world right now
New ussr IFV 11.0
Oh , buen target para los drones ucranianos y los Javelin
Si no tienen ya ni para las retiradas que pueden hacer esos Nazi Ucranianos? O ya se, matar gente y quemar edificios con gente adentro como lo hacían a las minorias en el 2014, solo hay pueden usar los Javelins.
Gaijin take notes
Parade float.
Honestly this would be great for a command vehicle, I don’t support the Russians but command vehicles are important in an army usually when you lose a command center you break the back of the frontlines and that’s why so many armies fail when their lines are broken they’re often left broke of contact with other battalions losing cohesion.
It doesn't really matter for Russian forces anyways. They don't really have officers on the ground, there aren't really any NCOs, just soldiers getting told what to do on the radio. That's why there's a lack of discipline in the Russian military, as well as unorganized attacks. Russian equipment isn't even that bad, and Soviets made mindbogglingly high amounts of every piece of ammo or armor. Russia should be winning in Ukraine realistically, just they don't utilize their assets
@y0h0p38 All of what you're saying was true in 2022 and the beginning of 2023, but judging on the situation on the front I'd say the Russians have learned and adapted to their mistakes.
@@revengian6526 I know but it happens in most wars not only Ukraine I was not speaking about Ukraine I was speaking in general.
Distinctive looks would make it priority target. Commanders are far behind the frontline, they don't need heavy IFVs.
Oh look, a future raised garden bed for sunflowers in Ukraine.
It is not nice to say something like that.
I'm sure Russian tankers will not be running over flowerbeds of Ukranian cemeteries.
Please respect the fallen Ukranian soldiers.
@@rusticbox9908 2+ years, 300,000 kia vatniks, still no 3 days to Kyiv, and no chance of Trump being POTUS again.
Deal with it. 🇺🇲😎🇺🇦
Fancy looking spaceship
Brak power pack. I tyle w temacie. Nie wspomnę o wyposażeniu pojazdu w zagraniczne urządzenia
To atrapa
@@kroolis77to by nie była atrapa ,ale większość elektroniki jest z zachodu. Mogą podmienić na im dostępna, ale jakosc będzie gorsza.Nie wiadomo tez jak z świadomością sytulacyjna załogi. Mozliwe ze to ślepiec, lub prawie ślepy pojazd .
@@robertklimczak5630 oczywiście masz rację, ale ja nazywam t14 atrapa, t15 różaniec, su57 femboi ( to nie moje, chyba lazerpig na RUclips)
Test it in Ukraine! Lets see if can handle a thousand dollars drone!
Heaviest? what about the Israeli Namer IFV on a freaking merkava chassis?
the t15 looks a lot bigger
@@sniffer123-z1o But 20 tons lighter?
@@y.m.9277
Yeah the Namer IFV is indeed the heaviest IFV in existence right now.
But it is only 1 existing prototype of the Namer IFV.
All the other vehicles are just APC variants without autocanon
The IFV variant of the Namer is indeed very formidable, on the same level as the T14 Armata IFV.
They are both equally good, but they are still only prototypes
❤Russia
😂 Does it come with its own John Deer tractor to haul it away when it breaks down ? 🚜
Interesting facts
Paper tiger.
How long do you think that would last in Ukraine?
How many have been produced?
I noticed that the top speed and cost per unit wasn't mentioned.
I guess that Putin has gotten a new taxi because I know about the likelihood of that ever being used to move russian troops about at the front.
Its already in limited production, west is still using last gen ifvs. By how jealous you are i guess you are American kiddo.
well actually, that's none of your business
Looks like a good vehicle for war thunder
Never enter the battle build to display only
Kamikaze drone has entered the chat
Heaviest paperweight.
Slava Ukraine..🇨🇦🇵🇭🇺🇦
You've been spamming this everywhere, shut up or join up stop mooching off us 🇨🇦🤮
Join up or shut up stop mooching off us 🇨🇦 🤮
You've been spamming this everywhere, Join or shut stop mooching off us 🇨🇦🤮
Ukraine kaputt !! 👎👎👎👎👎😂😂😂😂
Compare this to the new Bradley M2a4 and you will see the complete lack of technology. Welcome to the 1990's Russia.
LOL... REALLY THE T15 HAVE THE AFGANIT APS WITH AESA.RADAR , BMS AND RADAR TRIGGERED ERA
@@ignacio3890 on paper weeeeee, it'll be 30 years before Russia ever deploys equipment with that kind of technology. Its easier for them to barbaricly throw body's at their targets until they run out of ammo.
@@ignacio3890I don’t think many people understand how much harder it was to develop a system like Afganit to engage APFSDS rounds compared to western Trophy and Iron Fist systems. Trophy has advantages when it comes to engaging threats in the rear and from high angles of attack….Afganit has the advantage with multiple attacks from the forward 180 arc and with high velocity APFSDS rounds.
Trophy excels in asymmetric environments, Afganit is optimized for anti-tank engagements.
Realistically both systems will likely be redesigned following the lessons learned from the war in Ukraine.
One thing I will say though, if I were dismounted infantry I’d prefer the Afganit system since it’s less likely to turn accompanying troops into Swiss cheese.
@@Matt-yg8ub
Yes, but russia had the arena m ... they can mix the interceptor rounds
The prousa fanboy crew can't Understand the technollogy of the t15.
its PERSFECT...
And will not because russia can maybe afford to make one
They were hammered by the Bradley's so they make their own bradley like ifv
The Israeli Namer is heavier tho
No its not but namer is actually produced in numbers more than 3
@@rowanyuh6326I’m pretty sure the Namer is around 68 tons which would make it the heaviest IFV. Right?
Never realized that Russia was building transformers, where the button for the dingy.
Thats cool and all, but call back when Russia actually manages to produce something in numbers.
If it is so good, why it is not used in Ukraine? I am sure a Tank mine would be eager to introduce itself
Blyat-mobile is doing more efficiently than all of modern tanks
Hmm............ this looks promising -_-
Two heaviest paper tanks in the world. In a service in the second strongest paper country
The only paper country is China because they use it to make vehicles
lol they can’t even get the t-14 armada out into the battlefield this is a joke
@24kpullhmm time will tell and Russian government is very corrupt so let’s see if they can actually make the thing first lol for all we know it’s garbage
@24kpullyes design issues lead to production issues silly goose we all know that
@24kpullif you can’t build the parts you cannot build the vehicle
@@thetwotones232 not really if you don't have a factory available for mass production it's not a design flaw. Usually many countries either create entire new assembly lines or remodel old ones
@@thetwotones232 hey did you know that importing exists, thats what most countries do to get microchips... thermal sights for example are nearly NEVER produced domestically
I have no idea people debating about this bunch of steel
He looks like the Homer Vehicle 😂
He? Homer?
@@eddieazimi5865you can Google it
Homer Vehicle 😉
@@eddieazimi5865
Homer Vehicle
Google it
Geçit törenini bitiremedi savaş alanında paket olur
Russia is great at convincing people that it has new advanced technology when it only ever has about 3. There are 7 SU-57’s and 11 T-14’s. There are even less of these and they will never see combat because they’re not actually combat capable vehicles.
95% of Russian “new tech” is paper tech. At best it can TECHNICALLY work (see the Kinzhal which is a “hypersonic missile”, AKA a ballistic missile modified to be put on a bomber), and at worst it never sees combat and is forgotten (like the Soviet laser tank or the Object 292). The other 5% is something that the rest of the world already had, like the Ratnik kit being such an improvement for Russian infantry to finally start getting issued actual body armor in 2015 (and without all the rest that was promised, like portable thermal vision and Russian variant GPS “GLONASS”).
how about ak-47? t34 tank? t64? mig 15? t72? Lancet drones? oh man what could i tell you.. my history told me that russia has enough track record proving itself with pioneering engineering in its own aspects. U can say the same for western military technology advertisements and concepts man. stop being a NAFO bot, in reality this t15 thing is just gonna be an average IFV like the Bradley or BMD's just with improved ERA and trophy system. even t72 has destroyed a m1 abrams in Ukraine so idt russian technology is that far behind and all of this is a PR stunt for the russian public. if everything from the t72 in the 1980's shown as the equivalent to the t-14 we have today like as a propaganda stunt then russia would be effectively still be fighting with t64's till now since every advancement russia gas made in the military sector "is just another piece of shit", say that to the ak-47 man 😅
@@evananthony1395AK-47 was a piece of shit which is why it was quickly revamped into the AK-74M and then the AKM and then into the AK-74. T-64 was revolutionary but was too troublesome to maintain, expensive, unreliability issues, and too slow to manufacture in war time which is why the T-72 was invented as a replacement to the main Soviet tank fleet. The T-14 and T-15 Armata will suffer the exact same fate of the T-64 but 100x worse. Too expensive, too unreliable, too complex, too hard to maintain, too slow to produce even in peacetime. Lancet isn’t hard to make since it’s just a beefed up Maverick FPV drone. T-34 and MiG-15 are accomplishments of the past which the Russian Federation is no longer capable of so why bother bringing them up. And no a T-72 has not destroyed an Abrams in Ukraine. It was an FPV drone which is the main tank killer of the war.
@@Googles23m
1st:
ak-47 is a piece of shit? enlighten me how, it surely is more reliable than that m14a1 and far more simpler to produce
2nd: t-65 was not expensive, ur shitting information out of ur ass rn. its the world most bought and imported tank for a reason, its also why most of the third world country with minimal military budget buy them because of they relatively cheap maintanance and spareparts. and no its not hard to produce during wartime. its literally the t34 of MBT's, in the other hand Leporads, centurions and m60 has all of the things u mentioned but luckily those who have them r rich countries with military budget to maintain the superior quality though would never outproduce t64's.
3rd: again ur shitting information out of ur ass, theres a reason why russia have the most tanks in their arsenal. doesnt it correlate to how easy it is to produce and maintain 12,000 tanks in their storage without much struggle? and no the t14 and t15 will be the future gen tanks that will fight against next gen nato tanks, of course its not polished but we will never knoe their performance since it has never been battle tested.
4th: "lancet drones are just beefed up mavericks" doesnt revolutionary technology is just beefed up old technology but cheaper or more effective than the predecessors in the way people havent thought of? example the stg44 by nazi Germany is basically a beefed up mp-40 with rifle bullets giving birth to the assault rifle class and being the Father of all assault weapons there is right now.
5th: dont be a NAFO bot, it dont support russia but its irritating for you people to just shit anything anti-russian out of your mouth, if its always the case that you'll say then everything that NATO sent to ukraine will demolish all those "shit & obselete" Russian equipment while being unschated. in reality? pumas, bradley, stryer, and now even a leopard has been captured by russian forces. proves how there is always a degree in which even the shittiest army by the media is able to have some degree of effectiveness.
Several dozens of su57 and 120 of T14.. Armata production comes along with t90m tanks
@@evananthony1395The T34 needed American lend lease machine tools to manufacture the barrel, and the mig 15 used British engines, the ak47 was also designed by the same German who who designed the stg44 who was captured at the end of the war and forced to work in the kalishnikov factory.
Heavier than Maxxpro and MRAP. More stable at top speed though. If the T-15 can cross water it's the better vehicle. Update this video with horsepower numbers.
It states 1500hp.
It doesn’t go out in the rain, like t14 atrapa cardboard gets soggy when wet😂😂
In Broken Arrow that thing was busted!
Let's see if this one will actually exist on the battlefield unlike the T14.
Also it looks very simillar to the german Begleitpanzer.
it wont even enter mass production
@@just1moro168 mass production? brother it won't even enter preproduction
@@python3215 theres like a dozen of them by now tbf
@@just1moro168 there’s 8 prototypes. The most accomplished thing they’ve done so far is break down in parades
@@python3215 your brainwashed if you think they broke down
I really wonder how everyone is gonna counter drones in the future. It doesn't seem like jamming tech in the battlefield has reached its peak or else this thing will be as good as a million dollar modern art piece somewhere.
They show it to the country before the drones get to it
Baneblade, beginning… For the Emperor!
the T14 dose not even exist
That's just lies
It does, idk how tf people still think this way
@illarionsusi8223 if you saw one video about the T14, you would know it doesn't exist. Stalin fan
@illarionsusi8223 the russian ministry of Defense, even said that they're putting out 2 T-14 Armata MBT's per month
@Alec-jo7ic they didn't say that,
It is in fact still in testing for a multitude of reasons. Doesn't mean it's not a real tank 💀
Oh yeah the world's heaviest tank is totally not going to sink into the Ukrainian soil 😅 you think just because you spray paint junkyard metal it magically turns it into a fighting vehicle!?
This looks like something Tom Clancy's Endwar Russia would field, not actual real life Russia
NO WAY! Landraider!
They need to be in par with the nato puma ifv
I coulda swore these things saw some combat trials in Ukraine at the end of 2022. Turns out that having a big, heavy and fuel thirst IFV puts alot of strain on supply lines and it was found that the weapons station was poorly armored which meant it was vulnerable to the most basic forms of anti tank munitions. Turns out having tracks in an urban environment where mines and enemy infantry can ambush you from any angles leaves this thing particularly vulnerable
That's why we uparmoured it.
It's still an ifv the main weapon is the dismount so turret protection is not crucial.
Самый невидимый танк в мире, его можно увидеть только 9мая в остальное время он находится в режими невидимки😁
The smartest person in his room has spoken, listen to him...
The uselesa weapon ever made the tank
Well, if anything, if I am infantry I'd rather be in this than anything else. Maybe there are close competitors, but this would do for me just fine. 😅
When shaheed impacts it burns no matter what number it has or how big it was
It’s really not a good ifv. Obviously on paper it’s one of the best but the addition frontal protection against main battle tank rounds shouldn’t be necessary in an ifv. It’s not made to destroy tanks and it just makes it more expensive.
What about price, the price is in labour..
They have near unlimited natural resources, with time they can make as many as they want.
Logistics and modular mass produced platforms like the t72 have been very effective so far.
New War Thunder update 🔥🔥🔥🔥
Because they don't need the t14 or t15 on the battlefield because there winning the t90m and t80bvm t72b3 are doing fine whats the point in putting the t14 or any new tech up against an iferior foe and potentially giving up its secrets sounds a smart move to me.
Or here comes the reality: Would you rather lose a bugatti's price or a lada's price daily?
Pretty cool tank, interesting to see how it will do in the future if Russia is still in its war against Ukraine. Hopefully the comments aren’t filled with Tank and Engineering experts that know apparently know everything about Russia and its military secrets n what not… hopefully.
The main problem is that it's heavy and uses a T-14 chassis, so it would guzzle fuel, and it's heavy so it would get stuck a lot, and price for these would be very expensive
Nice coffin.
Good. Great. Best... Not enter the service.
Yk, there’s a reason IFVs and APCs are usually very light.
I guess you've never seen a bradley or a puma ?
@@dannycage8672 30.5 and 31.4 tons respectively. Those are both extremely light for modern combat vehicles, armed in the way that they are.
@@topaz2821 The Puma is about 43-44 tons and even heavier depending on loadout
@@dannycage8672 yes, the puma C is. But given that’s not the empty mass of the vehicle. The T15s empty mass is 44 tons empty. And while I can’t speak on the effectiveness of the puma, the Bradly performs exceedingly well when used properly. The issue of having extra armor is that you need a larger engine, transmission, and tracks to achieve the same speed and ground pressure of other IFVs, which leads to even more weight, which means more fuel needs to be burned. All this considering Russias current supply line issues means it cannot be used for the deep in scouting missions IFVs are usually used for. Ok? Sorry for the rant.
@@topaz2821 lol, the Bradley was just proven to vulnerable to anything and a bad vehicle overall slow and underpowered engine, Puma look promising but the thing is, heavy IFVs are about to become the new tanks as tanks will become more of a tank on tank combat vehicles
T-15 Armata is now a myth. It deserves no praise.
T-14 looks more cool
That would be great if it worked at all
T15 armata the ladda of all tanks😮
It just looks like a Bmp terminator but thiccer
How much fuel will it take, because it’s based of the t-14 chassis, will this need extreme amounts?
Ohhh, there's my coffee machine processor. I was wondering why it was on backorder.
Semoga indonesia bisa beli
It probably costs to much do they only keep them around for parades and stuff you’ll not see one in the battlefield