Kites Board Game Review - Lets Get High

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 30 июл 2024
  • Join us as we take a look at the real time game Kites published by Floodgate Games.
  • ИгрыИгры

Комментарии • 28

  • @PaulMazzoni
    @PaulMazzoni Год назад +6

    Freaking really enjoy this game. It seems to be easy for some groups, but then I just played it with drinking buddies (6 of us) and we failed 3 times with no challenge cards. But got better each time. Game time is short and easy to learn. Love the chaos!

  • @chucktelschow
    @chucktelschow Год назад +4

    Very interesting! Without your review this is not a game I would have given a second thought but now I need to snatch it up!

    • @BoardGameBollocks
      @BoardGameBollocks  Год назад +4

      It’s a great now and then game but we went apeshit with it for about a week…addictive.

    • @chucktelschow
      @chucktelschow Год назад +2

      @@BoardGameBollocks yeah I was thinking a very nice starter game before digging into something with some meat.

  • @hunterkarr5618
    @hunterkarr5618 Год назад +4

    Gotta love a cool innovative mechanic 👍

  • @FloodgateGames
    @FloodgateGames Год назад +3

    Thanks for the review! Sorry to seem stingy with the challenge cards, we'll work on it!

  • @MercesLatres
    @MercesLatres Год назад +2

    I dont usually watch RUclips videos till the end, but the outro music is far too alluring 🤘🤘

  • @kevindelord
    @kevindelord Год назад +3

    Great video once again! I usually don’t like real time coop games as you need to train get better. I think this one might be cool because of its simplicity and how straightforward it is. I despise Kitchen Rush and the likes as they stuff everywhere and so many rules, too hard and not fun.

  • @joaomartins1033
    @joaomartins1033 Год назад +3

    This game seems to be so interesting 😍

  • @adriang6259
    @adriang6259 Год назад +1

    Interesting. I'll have to keep an eye out.

  • @PompeyLegend2009
    @PompeyLegend2009 Год назад +1

    Have been looking at this game online recently. I thought it sounded good but it is quite pricey for what it is. Sand must be expensive to produce!

    • @BoardGameBollocks
      @BoardGameBollocks  Год назад +2

      Sourced from Alum Bay…FACT.

    • @PompeyLegend2009
      @PompeyLegend2009 Год назад +1

      @@BoardGameBollocks my original comment was based on seeing it for sale on Amazon for £54 but it is available on another board game website for a more reasonable £14.99! So not that expensive after all.

    • @BoardGameBollocks
      @BoardGameBollocks  Год назад +1

      I grabbed it from www.theludoquist.com/

  • @petermillen6924
    @petermillen6924 Год назад +2

    This looks like a good game but I just can’t hack real time games, they make me whimper.
    Good review though.

  • @theshogunstein6475
    @theshogunstein6475 Год назад +1

    sometimes simple is good

  • @monkeymanbob
    @monkeymanbob Год назад +3

    I know it says 2 player, but certain games are just shit unless you have 3 or more players irrespective of what it reckons.

    • @TheHexyBeast
      @TheHexyBeast Год назад +2

      i want to see the solo variant lol

    • @BoardGameBollocks
      @BoardGameBollocks  Год назад +3

      I play this with my wife and while we enjoy it, it’s far too easy with 2.

    • @VorpalSlade
      @VorpalSlade Месяц назад +1

      Innit, hate when games say "2-6" on the box then BGG (sorry, the 'horrible little website') is like "Nah it sucks shite at any playercount other than 6."

  • @JonTripp115
    @JonTripp115 Год назад +3

    Timers are supposed to have different amounts of sand, you didn't get a defective copy.

    • @BoardGameBollocks
      @BoardGameBollocks  Год назад +4

      Cool beans

    • @anonvideo738
      @anonvideo738 8 месяцев назад +1

      @@BoardGameBollocks My copy also says on the rules what the timers are. 30 s for red, 45s for orange, 60s for yellow, 75s for blue, 90s for purple and 60s for white.

    • @BoardGameBollocks
      @BoardGameBollocks  8 месяцев назад

      @anonvideo738 yea I missed it. Someone already pointed that out but thanks 👍🏻