Индия в любом случае обогнала бы Великобританию, так как не может быть, чтобы 60 миллионов человек приносили денег больше чем страна с населением 1,5 миллиарда человек
20:28 INDIA govt. Refused to take aid from 2008 and gives billion in Aid to developing countries. What Uk use to give aid is less then 0.2% of our budget and india aid to farmers is more than that fir fertilizers
@@charliebaker1427 don't worry, we will continue to grow and our companies have already started giving you people employment , pretty soon we will run your puny little island too, oh wait... we already do...😂.
@@charliebaker1427 thanks to divide and rule policy and britishers created ethnic mess out in INDIA. just after 75 years of independence we overtook The looters who looted 45 trillion dollars from our land. after 1000 years of Invasion and loot and massacre now native people holds native land. we will rise until we eliminate poverty from ou country.
@@charliebaker1427 that's not your problem, go fix poverty issue of your country. We know how to handle our issue.we know the homeless,hunger problems of your country. Fix your problem and there is no any requirement of any European in any form here,protect yourself from Russian you poor🤣
Even US takes aid , no shame in taking money which benifits you ,, true capitalism they also stole money of Afghans in the name of 9/11 now that makes you a big fat miser capitalist
India gave 3 billion dollars to Sri Lanka recently and also gave aid to many other countries. India have forex reserve of 600 billion USD which is the 3rd or 4th largest in the world. India is the 5th largest economy. India has already told UK that we don't need your aid many times, also the aid goes to NGO's run by UK not to the govt of India. Just to give you an idea, what UK gave to India in last 10 years in the form of aid, India just gave that much worth of vaccines for free to more than 50 countries in less than a year!!
wrong. you cannot just spread vaccine around, it has to be approved. As of 31 January 2022, Covaxin (Indian vaccine) has been granted emergency use approval in 13 countries. India initially approved the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine (manufactured under license by Serum Institute of India under the trade name Covishield). Germany, which developed many different vaccines (the first mRNA vaccines as well) has given vaccine to 46 countries AND helped to built new vaccine manifactures for instance in Africa. The biggest donor countries in the world are 1. USA and 2. Germany (btw,, same is true for many other projects like the UN itself which gets most money from the US and after that from Germany. (which btw, starts to suck. I dont like that we support antisemitic/antizionist Nazi-Sharia countries and racist projects like 'Palestine' - which was already supported by Hitler/NSDAP - the real Nazis (which were mixed-left wing btw.), and their variations like all those socialist/left wing dictatorships and parties (not to talk about female rights, human rights, democracy etc. they permanently violate). Apropos, all of them are also anti-Hindu if one looks closer.
I believe it was Himmler who said "One German Tiger tank is worth 5 American Shermans...the problem is that the Americans always have a 6th coming over the hill." Or as Bill Burr would say "We McDonald's the shit outta them" 😅😅
hahah those Tiger's were beasts. It's scary to think what the world would look like if Russia and Germany stayed on the same side as originally planned.
@@willvr4 They were beasts alright. Which is exactly why they didn't do much for the Germans, who had a bad habit of building beyond their resources. Those tanks would've done better in the hands of a nation who could afford to run a lot of them.
Lmao. Now its the reverse these days. Nowadays I've come across so many Brits explaining to me how "British Army is stronger than Indian Army due to better technology despite much lower numbers". And I go like "yeah, but British Army is just two divisions strong. India normally fields 45 Divisions, not counting paramilitary." . Or according to this example: it'd be "Challenger 2 is the best tank in the world and worth 10 T-90, but we got just 224 Challenger 2 while they got 4200 T-90 and T-72" . In just a few years, when Brits get the Challenger 3, the situation would be to that India will be manufacturing as many tanks as UK has in just one year. And still the Brits will continue to explain how they are stronger (on land).
@@bigenglishmonkey i think you don't know about recent scenarios Right now India Rupee showed more resilience against dollar compare to british pound which was more depreciated against dollar
@@shub6707 doesn't matter the rupee right now equals 10 pence. its like India having a higher GDP than Britain yet the average yearly wage in India is 3,000 pounds in Britain its 45,000 pounds. because unlike the rupee the pound is also worth more than the dollar.
@@bigenglishmonkey income in India is low but everything is also way cheaper in India than UK..so if i am earning 30k Rupees per month in India which equal to 300 pound i can live a great life in India but in 300 Pound per month i can't live properly in UK
UK gave actually 2.3 billion pound as aid to India between 2016-2021. Every idiot can google that. I personally think that if India doesnt want this money then the UK should stop that. But first of all, India likes that money (even if not every Indian likes that) and secondly, some helper syndrome structures in the West also want to give money (and also live as NGO from that) and talk all the day about poor people (even if not everyone in the UK likes that). So, you have on all sides happy and unhappy ppl ;)
India's gdp(nominal) : 3.6 trillion $ UK's gdp(nominal) : 3.1 trillion $ India's gdp (ppp) : 11.5 trillion $ UK's gdp (ppp) : 3.1 trillion $ India's growth rate : 9 % UK's growth rate : 2-3 % India's inflation rate : 6-7 % UK's inflation rate : 11-12 % India's military rank : 4th in the world (mighty) [growing] UK's military rank : 8th in the world (tiny) [I doubt they can hold that rank in future against some growing Asian and south American nations] India's pm : Indian (a Hindu) UK's pm : Indian origin (a Hindu) India's political stability : best in the world currently UK's political stability : worst in the world currently. They have to change their pm continuously LoL India : 5th largest economy nominally and it'll be a 3rd largest economy by 2027-2029 UK : 6th largest economy currently but in future it'll be replaced by other growing nations for sure lol. UK looted 45 trillion $ from India still such condition lol. Conclusion : don't compare a rising sun with a setting sun.
If it’s such a great place to live why are so many emigrating? And there is still a large gap between rich and poor. I’m just saying it doesn’t seem all positive.
@@willdavey1565 Why did your ancestors came to India by boats some 400 years back? Unlike the Indians who emigrate legally, the Brits came to our shores unsolicited. Not just that, much of UK's industrialisation was fuelled by looted money out of India and other smaller colonies.
@@darshitaagrawal8258 Emigration is not all bad. A lot Indians send remittances back home thereby contributing to India's economy. The Chinese used to emigrate more than Indians, China is quite prosperous now. I live in SG, I see so many Europeans and Americans. Does that mean the US and the EU are bad?
@@KiriAatam no no! I was not saying emigration as a bad thing But we have a problem here in India that a lot of top students, our highest level of talent migrates. The statics is very high, so it's a problem for India And also the gap between rich and poor is true...and we have to work on it. The world just knows the negative points about india, so we indian have became defensive to any type of criticism. When the world will start seeing both good and bad,we will also take criticism from them(this is what i was trying to say).
1) The brief burst of U.S. spending in 1896-1898 went mostly to a larger navy, and the rest for the Spanish-American War of 1898. 2) From the 1890s until World War 1, the UK built an astonishing number of battleships, several every year. The technology advanced so rapidly that some were already obsolete when they entered service. The other naval powers were the doing the same. 3) By the time the U.S. entered World War 1, the UK and France were financially spent. The U.S. provided the financing later in the war, but much of the weaponry the American army fought with in 1918 was French. The war ended before the U.S. arms industry could develop and build it own weapons. Enormous quantities of food, clothing, oil, and other military supplies were supplied by the U.S. 4) The massive military spending by the Soviet Union in the 1970s and '80s, and the consequent lack of money for everything else, was one of the causes of its collapse in the early '90s.
Dude your aid to India is $50mn while you looted from India $45 trillion. And very smartly you aid in India goes to NGOs of UK majority money goes back to Brits plus free pass degrade India's image thru those NGOs etc. Indians provide more aid to UK thru it's industrial employment in Britain. Study well before your century old info.
@@bigenglishmonkey Brother, do you even know how much Britain had looted India in two hundred years...around 50 trillion dollar. They left us on ashes of gold and you are talking like this.. unbelievable
@@anmoldwivedi5403 yeah because that number is a lie created by a communist, and economists across the world have looked into it and even by steel-manning her positions they cant even get half that number. Britain made fifty pence for every pound it spent on the empire, but if you believe that number then tell us wheres the money? if that's how much money Britain got from India alone why is our GDP less than 3 trillion? Bengal famine started (just like the other 120 recorded famines over the last 500 years) because of weather disasters, crop disease, and this time the Japanese invasion taking rice fields, and they sunk every ship Britain sent with food from Australia. India- nah Britain did this. the partition of India was demanded by Hindus and Muslims alike, then after we left you all started slaughtering each other. India- nah this is Britain fault. ive seen Indians blame Britain for deaths in both world wars while simultaneously bragging about being the biggest volunteer army in history. im talking like this because as far as ive seen if it gives them another reason to hate Britain. then Indians will believe anything.
UK aid to India is extremely minuscule compared to what it looted from India during its 200+ year rule...keep that in mind...I don’t know why UK gives India few million pounds per year worth of aid...
@dhirajmalapati268 donating money creates no profit. if you think otherwise than u support that India now gives money (from 2016-2021 it was around 2.3 billion pound) to UK? if not then you know now that you are talking bullshit. the reality is that - as everyone who is not blind knows - the western countries have the mentality/partly ideology to want to help everyone who is poor. plus, many NGOs want live form that and safe their existence - which results in permanent new narratives which reproduces such helper syndromes ...
What aid are these blokes talking about...It's the money they looted which they're returning...U see why their people are so down on education and awareness...
It's pretty laughable when you said, that the aid that UK gives goes to military spending. 😂😂😂Compare £50m (UK's aid to India) to 71 billion USD you'll laugh yourself. Indian companies invest billions in UK every year and create employment in UK!! £50m is a charity that an Indian businessman can write off in a blink of an eye.
India is aid provider not aid receiver since 2008 so kindly stop living in fake superiority complex now India is 3 rd largest gdp in terms of ppp and 5 th largest in nominal terms
@@thegreatgatsby8180 so what looted our money and providing aids to us with our money that's how British is being developed by lotting other nations...harsh but true
@@thegreatgatsby8180 and also i spend more on my pocket money than the aid british gives to india...so think before you speak and also we came a long way from 1947 we're 4th strongest even after being looted by looters. And one of the fastest growing economies ..we know how to grow by our own not by other's money....again think and research strong before you speak.
Just FYI, U.S.'s budget jumped significantly in the 2000s because of 9/11. It was the primary cause for such a big increase, even though no other country was even close to their budget.
Brother again your comments on india very very outdated. British Aid to india is about 0.4% of india's GDP our government spent more on fertilizer subsidies. PLZ check your facts and india spend 2% of GPD on defence. You talk about your aid like india is just run on your aid. Do you know why britain pay aid to india????? Britain ruled india for almost 200 years during that time britishers killed indians looted india do not forget why they came to india to do trade brother. I'm happy with today’s britishers (common people who had nothing to do with what those Britishers did to us) but not with your government and your Royal Family. And they should say sorry to india we are happy with that no need to give so called aid royal family they killed indians not today's britishers. check out Bengal famine in 1943 killed 3.8million, jallianwala bagh massacre in 1919, 379 people were killed during open fire on protesters by british officer. this is why you send aid not doing us a favor you talk like you are doing a favor. Britain stole 45trillions of today's money looted from india during british occupation PLZ do reply share your thoughts. check india's share in world GDP after and before british occupation i know you do not know all the facts just read or see what media tell but you can check all the facts if you want now india is 5th largest economy in the world behind US,China,Japan,Germany recently india overtook UK, of course in PPP terms because of so much population individual indians are still poor. ruclips.net/video/mCgBQFhQGf0/видео.html
Stop quoting Shashi Tharoor like a buffoon. British Aid to India is not 0.4% of Indian GDP, its much less than that. A better counter is the fact that India gives $2.3 Billion in aid to other countries every year. Compared to the few tens of millions UK gives to India as aid. And if you have a brain, instead of talking about the British Raj that they all know about, talk about how that British Aid is not aid but funds sent to NGOs to sabotage India's growth by organizing protests against infrastructure projects. Tell them about how Indian Government, since 2004, has been asking UK not to send this aid. Tell them about the FCRA law that had to be enacted to stop this menace of foreign money disguised as aid sent to India for waging economic war on India. Be original in your comments.
@@death_parade The fact you are picking up is not also yours is it???? What are we experts we are not competing in tournament or something. We are normal people living their lives and saying something against what is wrong. You say they know all about britih raj Do they??? Do they know all??? They only know goody goody part they are not aware what those evil people did to us. If you quote modi's slogan or modi quote 's someone else's slogan does it make him duplicate or does it make you duplicate??? Like modi say world is one family does it make him duplicate???? What we talk or say about things and numbers or nice words someone else mentioned whose job is do that, we quote them. If you have peoblem with Shashi or with any other go there. Do not finger your arse here. Get the fuck out. Be original like you consider your self, you fool
@@TGill22 So you are angry because I asked you to make an effort instead of copying what someone else said verbatim. Hmm...makes sense. There are people like you who are vulnerable to propaganda because they just pick up and _maro ratta_ of everything that catches their fancy but don't do a deeper internet study of things. And then there are people like me who are somewhat resilient to propaganda because of trying to look up facts and come to our own conclusions. Its not a competition, but when I see a fellow countryman who is vulnerable to propaganda, I try to pull him up to ensure India as a whole remains strong. I do my part. But I guess your stupid ego got in the way.
@@death_parade @Death Parade bro you did not asked you suggested. And I am not angry, you are angry because you commented not me. If Shashi presented facts i spread that facts this doesn't call copying. So does these facts are propogenda to you?????? If I was vulnerable to propogenda I would have believed in cow urine, modi great, congress is strong, india is dirty, indian army is weak, UK is the great country, China is great etc etc crap. You say you do research on deeper level what does it mean, if government give data you come up with something else??? You count indian population under 1billion??? Plz stop counting yourself almighty or high. I do not question your facts earlier they are true. Do not think only your facts are true and counting or saying what other told is not cool or something else. When we talk about india's economy before british raj and after british raj is it not ture???? We give or make others aware what their people did to us. Does saying or giving indian deaths count is copying??? Because I did not count those myself???? How does it work???? When you have to make others aware you give facts it does not matter if They said by someone else if they are true you can say billion times, because you are presenting or making others aware. Now you also said when you see a fellow countryman who is vulnerable to propaganda, you try to pull him up ensure india as a whole remains strong. Guess what you put crack because you feel this is all propogenda. Does my comment look propogenda to you??? You said you did your part but my stupid ego got in the way, you yourself think highly of you and I am egoistic person??? Bro come to reality tell me which part is propogenda
@@death_parade to propogenda is we are going to take back POK, propogenda is when they say india is better than China, propegenda is when they say india is superpower, propogenda is when they say india can compete with UK,USA,China, propogenda is when they say we kicked Chinese ass in galwan, propogenda is when people like you think this government is just perfect, previous were shot, propogenda is when people think previous government were perfect this is shit. Reality is india is growing and will become superpower, and can challenge or kick Chinese ass, india will become superpower but not bigger than US, India can not take back POK until China become busy somewhere else, reality is Very different we all know. No one is falling for propogenda, unless you think Shashi's facts about british raj are propogenda
Go and check the data. Indian companies are providing jobs in the UK like Jaguar land rovers, Hamleys toys, TCS, Tetley, East India company, Tata steel etc. You should have proper knowledge before speaking anything about India.
For your information your aid to India less than 1 % . Our country actually gives more aid to other countries. India is the second most foreign investor in the UK . Its time to change your colonial mind . If we are talking about the aid then what the 45 trillion looted from our country by the British and also many jewels and precious metals taken from our country. First of all returned the Kohinoor diamond in your queen's crown.
France is undersold on the chart as they maintained an arms industry well above what the countries military budget would lead to believe. This was done mostly via extensive foreign sales; throughout the Cold War (and afterwards) if you wanted to buy Western equipment, and either couldn't or wouldn't work with the US, then France was the go-to option.
@@bigbake132 people forget the US was fairly anti-Israel in its early years. You can actually see the military makeup of Israel shift in the decades following the two nations relationship improving to include significant amounts of American gear and similar reductions in French equipment, especially in terms of new orders.
I am calling BS. Democrats have controlled all of congress and the presidency for the last two years, no way they would continue to pour money into the military. That is strictly a Republican and right wing goal, you are most likely mixing something up.
They are preparing for a potential altercation with China and North Korea very soon. After those wars happen then the US defence industry will drop again
to clear up any apparently ambiguous points I made in the original post here's it from the horse's mouth www.usaspending.gov/agency/department-of-defense?fy=2022
India to UK - We don't want your aid. UK to India - We will give you aid. India to UK - We don't need your . Uk to India - But we will give you. Finally, India puts it's foot down we will not accept your aid. UK - We will give to NGOs. So lets cut long story short. UK is giving aid to NGOs and not to the government. As your aid is peanuts for our country .
The aid provide to India is not to indian government but to Christian missionaries and ngo which historically always against india and also india provide aids to many country so don't be in illusion you are that important
@bhaumikgandhi5499 Well, india will surpass the uk, but even after that, they still have a permanent un seat, which alone makes them one of the most important states
@@anderson._.._.8801 india already surpassed uk. And having permanent seat is not important after all uk is usa's vassal state. Economy is everything. Your economy will reduce and our will grow. With rise in economy, expenditure in reserch and development budget rise. But although today expenditure in r&d is very less in india but gov is currently focusing on infrastructure so I'm not that worried
@bhaumikgandhi5499 india only recently surpassed the uk in gdp, and the uk is the 6 largest economy on the planet, which is very good so? And "uk is a vassal of us" bro what😂? Also I know the permanent un seat is not everything but even without it the uk is more important than india since the uk has military bases across the world due to its island all over the world while india is in aisa more important the uk is globally more important Also, btw I m. Not from Britain I m german
Uk doesnt provide Aid it has been 10-12 yrs well its was UK who wanted to give aid to say they have upper hand. And india gdp is higher than Uk and it will be double of UK gdp at the end of this decade.
This country portfolio review will examine how the UK’s aid programme in India has developed since the former Department for International Development stopped providing direct financial aid to the Indian government in 2015. And much of these funding who knows where its going and what is being done. Source ICAI.
For india Britain sending their aid stopped nearly 20 years ago now it is investing in india where it gets more returns than it invests check your facts right just read your government published files of aid and investments in uk
I just thought that it would be hilarious if that famous Mexican futbol announcer (Goooooooool) would commentate on this. Specially early on when various countries were quickly going back and forth.
NATO requires 2% of GDP to be spent on military (even if alot of countries struggle to meet that), the USA is spending less than 4% of GDP. After watching the USA world bases video, you can understand why the budget is so much with so many troops stationed everywhere. I've seen a few reactors that are or were part of small Eastern European militaries, and they talk about how they liked having USA base in their country. Some pointed out how the only tanks they ever saw were US Abrams because their country just couldn't really afford them.
Since I'm sure it'll be talked about, it's worth pointing out that using sheer numbers can be misleading. For instance, I'm American and we have by far the highest military spending by raw number but it's only about 3.4% of our GDP, a much better measurement.We're 13th on the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute's Military Expenditure Database for 2019(I'm using the sources cited on Wikipedia's "List of countries by expenditures" page since RUclips isn't a huge fan of external links), well behind #1 Oman and for 2020, we don't even make the top 15 of another database's measurements. Not bad for a superpower.
As an American, military spending is the ONLY thing I don't mind my taxes going to at all. I will never complain about that part. I want our men to be as safe and successful as possible and always have an advantage, and I will happily open my wallet for that.
@Khabib Supremacy the 900 billion budget is the budget on paper. There are people who've worked with the U.N. before the pentagon that tried to investigate how much exactly we spend. The only thing they learned was we spend waaaaay more than what's on paper and there's no real way of knowing because our government does alot of things off the books so to speak and none can be tracked.
@khabibsupremacy4382 "Each year federal agencies receive funding from Congress, known as budgetary resources . In FY 2023, the Department of Defense (DOD) had $1.98 Trillion distributed among its 6 sub-components." (USA spending dot gov) To be honest I'm not sure what this means. Perhaps the yearly budget adds to this total? I'm not sure exactly how it works
It's still unbelievable how the Germans keep rising from the ashes. I think logically that this country is the only thing that could do that because of the mentality. Germany the land of poets and thinkers. Everyone worked non-stop. And now you have to include that Germany doesn't have good natural resources.. Unbelievable.
I love how British people make fun of France for surrendering so fast during world war 2 when the British are largely responsible for that happening not the French.
As people are pointing out with GDP. The US spends 3 percent for 800 billion in 2021 while in 2021 Saudi Arabian spent 6 percent for 40 billion. Imagine if the us spent 6 percent instead. Also even though the US spends more money every year, it's projected that the amount of GDP spent will decrease by 2032 to 2.7. that's madness Also in 1991 the Soviet union didn't just disband. It collapsed economically and disbanded. Also you mentioned the exponential growth of wealth, which can be attributed to the British Empire and United States which promoted free trade and both countries adopted alliances after WW2 which increased trade and wealth worldwide Also that increase in the 1900s post ww1 was definitely for defense. The US was the largest economy already by that point but was completely defenseless aside from the two oceans protecting it. It became increasingly necessary to have a bigger military
Indian Gov. already denied Britains aid but they insist to give according to some Geopolitical interest. Actually British aid gives to Christian missionaries and other Brit. led NGOs(not to Gov.) for safeguarding their interest in india and converting peoples of india to Christian through providing livelihood facilities . Somewhere they succeed at some parts of the regions like South India and specially Northeast .
as far as I know, italy technically had a monarchy all the way to ww2. The king sorta kinda told Mussolini to attack rome and take over the government... aleggedly.
Reason why Soviets surged from the 70s and 80s is because they started spending mind boggling amounts on the military which led to their downfall, leaders of the SSRs even complained about the expenditure, kinda the reason why they dissolved.
You send aid to us which is peanuts. Ok . We give more aid to others compared to what you give. Also what you stole from us is 45 Trillions and giving back some millions is nothing compared to that.
It is odd about Brazil's spending as one of the treaties it has is mutual aid from all North and South American countries if attacked. This includes the USA coming to its aid.
Sorry guys for disappointing you but UK's aid to INDIA is just comes for missionaries and churches...While UK looted $45 trillion from India during the period 1765 to 1938. UK's aid to INDIA is $2 billion so it's laughable to compare such things...😇
Hlo, i never commented before but some words made me comment do not use word swastika hitler did not used swastika he used hakenkreuzor hooked cross which was used in church all around the world, it was a symbol of peace in all religions. and hitler hated indians he said it is good thing britishers control india because they are meant to control, that we(germans) are pure race Aryans and aryans who travelled to india become lower by mixing in them. He showed himself as christian made banners about that etc etc. point is he hated us(indians) then why he will steal our symbol of peace??? he used christian symbol not indian, a person who translated mein kampf into english 2nd time in 1939 by james murphy he was a christian priest he used swastika for Hakenkreuz for the first time because in first mein kampf translation91931)they used hooked cross, arizona quaterly used the word gammadion minded for hitler and his followers published around 1946 An american movie in 1959 or 1960 used word swastika and connected it with evil and made it common. Very sad to see this how people use this against us. Soviet used sickle and hammer they also killed millions should we abandon these tools?? A video that explain all this- ruclips.net/video/YxvBFytl5aE/видео.html
It would be interesting to see a similar video based on countries spending as a percentage of their total GDP because I think Saudi Arabia is the highest
some millions of dollars is a big amount for britishers😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 "we give millions of dollars aid to India". In the meantime india spent 75 billion dollars on defence and give billions of dollars aid to countries around the world.
Many of the pre-1914 spurts by various countries were caused by the modernization and expansion of navies in the new Dreadnought era. Even South American countries got into naval arms races. The United States defense budget isn't just for manufacturing and maintaining arms, but for the research that keeps the new weapons systems at the cutting edge to defeat any potential rivals. China has a big military budget, but many of the weapons systems they build and buy with it can be decades behind those of the West.
the defense budget is big compared to other nations but it isn't a big part of our GDP. The US doesn't have Universal Healthcare purely for political/economic (not related to inability to budget for it; they prefer free market)/philosophical reasons. The defense allocation is 3% of the US GDP and has almost steadily gone down since 2010..in 2024 it is projected to be 2.7%
@@scottb3034 Exactly. I really don’t know why so many people love to point the finger at the defense budget when they want to start griping about some other spending they would like to see that isn’t happening (as if a lower defense budget would imply a sudden increase in everything else). Somehow so many continue to bang on that ignorant drum and repeat those shockingly naive and lazy talking points.
No, the German Empire didn't change to the 'Third Reich'... There was something known as the 'Weimar Republic' in between. The German Empire ended in 1919/1920.
2:13 France's spending increases and Daz goes "France fell off the cliff. Then it decreases and Daz goes "France bouncing back." Those visual changes were mostly because of Russia's dramatic shifts. Man can't interpret charts :D
I took a big gulp of beer around the 9:13 mark and when Daz said "France retreated quickly..." A few seconds later I spewed it all over my wife and dog. Thanks blokes
you cant convert local currency into USD, it doesn't work like that. It has to be adjusted to Purchasing power index (PPI) . $10 billion in US buys far less than $10 Billion in Russia which can be as much as 2-10x. All of these charts dont give you the real picture
I just came to know about a month or so ago that India and the US have a training school high up in the Himalayas, where spies are trained before being sent into China, Afghanistan, Oman, Qatar, Pakistan and other such volatile countries. I live close by and i never knew about it. I only got to know of it recently and everyone understands the reason why it is secretive, so we don't talk about it's location at all. The US army used to visit this place (among others) for HAWS (High Altitude Warfare School) but i never knew that it also served as a decoy for placing new trainees in the school. Fun fact:- It might also be a torture chamber as the mountain people regularly find skulls and bones nearby. They may be the work of local criminals or even Tigers and Leopards, but these animals generally don't go after humans so it's unlikely.
@@pointlessmanatee Nice try but the Himalayas are huge and we don't disclose the location so good luck finding it. You bet your smart @$$ will get the location, don't you.
You guys seem unaware of several wars that certainly affected military spending such as the Franco-German War in the 1870s, the Spanish-American War in the 1890s and the Russo-Japanese War in 1905. More recently, Reagan became US President in 1982 with a promise to increase military spending which he did and essentially bankrupted the Soviet Union forcing it to try to keep up. It collapsed in 1989 and under Yeltsin had a very bad economy so it's not surprising their military spending was very low for a while. I forget exactly when Putin came in but I suspect that would be when Russian spending started to grow again.
Op Downfall, right? Hard to know how much of that is propaganda given its the primary justification given for using the A-bombs. 6 million Allied troops landing, bigger than Op Overlord, etc, etc. Not saying it was completely wrong, but could easily be an inflated numbers case.
It sounds like a lot but it’s only a drop in the bucket of the budget for the USA. Military Spending is a big bogey man buzzword but in reality it’s not much. Social Security and Medicaid are both well above military spending, for example.
You guys are misinformed it seems .....indian gov does not accept foreign aid.....the aid if comes goes to NGOs run by UK gov in india ..... Also india is a net aid provider...
India gives more aid than it takes 🇮🇳
Indian govt never take aid from any country
God bless India
Jay Shri Ram 🕉️🙏🏻🧡🚩
Their scammers give a lot of aid to the world.
Индия в любом случае обогнала бы Великобританию, так как не может быть, чтобы 60 миллионов человек приносили денег больше чем страна с населением 1,5 миллиарда человек
India is net aid provide : which means India give more money as AID than it receives ..
Why do England give India aid ?
@@AM.10 beacuse of international commitments .. like G20 commitments and such .. Britian also stole 45 trillion from India when it was a colony
@@whereiskaran8830 Ohh makes sense ,thank you.
These westerners are Genuinely ignorant they have the courage to preach even after colonizing a country for centuries and looting it.
@@AM.10 Britain looted $45 trillion worth of money and resources from India in the 200 years of British rule. It's not an aid, it's like paying debt.
British people talking about aid is really funny :D
Exactly 🤣😂
🤣🤣first loot and destroy then pretend to be saviours
They can't digest the reality. LOSERS!!!
20:28 INDIA govt. Refused to take aid from 2008 and gives billion in Aid to developing countries.
What Uk use to give aid is less then 0.2% of our budget and india aid to farmers is more than that fir fertilizers
Yet india has a dramatic poverty gap in its own nation
@@charliebaker1427 don't worry, we will continue to grow and our companies have already started giving you people employment , pretty soon we will run your puny little island too, oh wait... we already do...😂.
@@charliebaker1427 thanks to divide and rule policy and britishers created ethnic mess out in INDIA.
just after 75 years of independence we overtook The looters who looted 45 trillion dollars from our land.
after 1000 years of Invasion and loot and massacre now native people holds native land. we will rise until we eliminate poverty from ou country.
@@charliebaker1427 that's not your problem, go fix poverty issue of your country. We know how to handle our issue.we know the homeless,hunger problems of your country. Fix your problem and there is no any requirement of any European in any form here,protect yourself from Russian you poor🤣
Even US takes aid , no shame in taking money which benifits you ,, true capitalism they also stole money of Afghans in the name of 9/11 now that makes you a big fat miser capitalist
India has officially overtaken the UK and has become the 5th largest economy in the world 🇮🇳💪🏽
Projected to be #3 by 2024
@@sethp26 🤞
@@sethp26 2024?
Na
It will take time
Atleast 2029
@@harshsingh-aug26 yeah sorry i misremembered, it's 2027
@@harshsingh-aug26 read economics it's 2026 we will be 3rd biggest economy
India gave 3 billion dollars to Sri Lanka recently and also gave aid to many other countries. India have forex reserve of 600 billion USD which is the 3rd or 4th largest in the world. India is the 5th largest economy. India has already told UK that we don't need your aid many times, also the aid goes to NGO's run by UK not to the govt of India. Just to give you an idea, what UK gave to India in last 10 years in the form of aid, India just gave that much worth of vaccines for free to more than 50 countries in less than a year!!
aid , u guys just looted 43 trillion dollar of resource from and ur complaining about it , *kers
wrong. you cannot just spread vaccine around, it has to be approved. As of 31 January 2022, Covaxin (Indian vaccine) has been granted emergency use approval in 13 countries. India initially approved the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine (manufactured under license by Serum Institute of India under the trade name Covishield). Germany, which developed many different vaccines (the first mRNA vaccines as well) has given vaccine to 46 countries AND helped to built new vaccine manifactures for instance in Africa. The biggest donor countries in the world are 1. USA and 2. Germany (btw,, same is true for many other projects like the UN itself which gets most money from the US and after that from Germany. (which btw, starts to suck. I dont like that we support antisemitic/antizionist Nazi-Sharia countries and racist projects like 'Palestine' - which was already supported by Hitler/NSDAP - the real Nazis (which were mixed-left wing btw.), and their variations like all those socialist/left wing dictatorships and parties (not to talk about female rights, human rights, democracy etc. they permanently violate). Apropos, all of them are also anti-Hindu if one looks closer.
welp the USA scientists gave the world the vaccine
I believe it was Himmler who said "One German Tiger tank is worth 5 American Shermans...the problem is that the Americans always have a 6th coming over the hill."
Or as Bill Burr would say "We McDonald's the shit outta them" 😅😅
hahah those Tiger's were beasts. It's scary to think what the world would look like if Russia and Germany stayed on the same side as originally planned.
@@willvr4 They were beasts alright. Which is exactly why they didn't do much for the Germans, who had a bad habit of building beyond their resources. Those tanks would've done better in the hands of a nation who could afford to run a lot of them.
Tigers may have been beasts, but the soviet t34s were just as good and 10x cheaper. And they had oil to fuel them.
@@willvr4 the original plan was to betray Russia.
Lmao. Now its the reverse these days. Nowadays I've come across so many Brits explaining to me how "British Army is stronger than Indian Army due to better technology despite much lower numbers". And I go like "yeah, but British Army is just two divisions strong. India normally fields 45 Divisions, not counting paramilitary."
.
Or according to this example: it'd be "Challenger 2 is the best tank in the world and worth 10 T-90, but we got just 224 Challenger 2 while they got 4200 T-90 and T-72"
.
In just a few years, when Brits get the Challenger 3, the situation would be to that India will be manufacturing as many tanks as UK has in just one year. And still the Brits will continue to explain how they are stronger (on land).
Being an indian
I spend more on my pocket money
Than UK's aid to India 🤣🤣
yeah but only cos the Indian rupee is worthless compared to the pound.
@@bigenglishmonkey i think you don't know about recent scenarios
Right now India Rupee showed more resilience against dollar compare to british pound which was more depreciated against dollar
@@shub6707 doesn't matter the rupee right now equals 10 pence.
its like India having a higher GDP than Britain yet the average yearly wage in India is 3,000 pounds in Britain its 45,000 pounds.
because unlike the rupee the pound is also worth more than the dollar.
@@bigenglishmonkey income in India is low but everything is also way cheaper in India than UK..so if i am earning 30k Rupees per month in India which equal to 300 pound i can live a great life in India but in 300 Pound per month i can't live properly in UK
@@shub6707 correct but thats only if you remove the standard of living.
like the fact indias average lifespan is 11 years less than britain.
Did he say uk gives financial aid to India??? 😂😂
They surely been living under a rock
He's saying like "100 Chuhe khake Billi chali Haj ko"🤣🤣🤣
They need to pay the $45Trillions back
UK gave actually 2.3 billion pound as aid to India between 2016-2021. Every idiot can google that. I personally think that if India doesnt want this money then the UK should stop that. But first of all, India likes that money (even if not every Indian likes that) and secondly, some helper syndrome structures in the West also want to give money (and also live as NGO from that) and talk all the day about poor people (even if not everyone in the UK likes that). So, you have on all sides happy and unhappy ppl ;)
@@thevinayjangid No country has 45 trillion dollars
@@thevinayjangiddo you seriously think they stole 45 trillion?
Back in the 1700-1800s back when the industrial revolution didn’t happen yet?
India's gdp(nominal) : 3.6 trillion $
UK's gdp(nominal) : 3.1 trillion $
India's gdp (ppp) : 11.5 trillion $
UK's gdp (ppp) : 3.1 trillion $
India's growth rate : 9 %
UK's growth rate : 2-3 %
India's inflation rate : 6-7 %
UK's inflation rate : 11-12 %
India's military rank : 4th in the world (mighty) [growing]
UK's military rank : 8th in the world (tiny) [I doubt they can hold that rank in future against some growing Asian and south American nations]
India's pm : Indian (a Hindu)
UK's pm : Indian origin (a Hindu)
India's political stability : best in the world currently
UK's political stability : worst in the world currently. They have to change their pm continuously LoL
India : 5th largest economy nominally and it'll be a 3rd largest economy by 2027-2029
UK : 6th largest economy currently but in future it'll be replaced by other growing nations for sure lol.
UK looted 45 trillion $ from India still such condition lol.
Conclusion : don't compare a rising sun with a setting sun.
If it’s such a great place to live why are so many emigrating? And there is still a large gap between rich and poor. I’m just saying it doesn’t seem all positive.
@@willdavey1565 Yes!it is not all positive
But when the world only see the negative
We have to show them our positives.
@@willdavey1565 Why did your ancestors came to India by boats some 400 years back? Unlike the Indians who emigrate legally, the Brits came to our shores unsolicited. Not just that, much of UK's industrialisation was fuelled by looted money out of India and other smaller colonies.
@@darshitaagrawal8258 Emigration is not all bad. A lot Indians send remittances back home thereby contributing to India's economy. The Chinese used to emigrate more than Indians, China is quite prosperous now. I live in SG, I see so many Europeans and Americans. Does that mean the US and the EU are bad?
@@KiriAatam no no! I was not saying emigration as a bad thing
But we have a problem here in India that a lot of top students, our highest level of talent migrates. The statics is very high, so it's a problem for India
And also the gap between rich and poor is true...and we have to work on it.
The world just knows the negative points about india, so we indian have became defensive to any type of criticism.
When the world will start seeing both good and bad,we will also take criticism from them(this is what i was trying to say).
India's aid to Sri Lanka on monthly basis is more than Britain gives aid to INDIA annually.
*BRITS got 45 trillion USD more to give it back to INDIA.*
The question is why the UK should currently be giving India anything. The Raj ended many decades ago now and the UK is no longer especially wealthy.
45 trillion dollars? Huh billions
@@howwecheatem3239 So Shocked 😂😂... $45 Trillion... that's the correct figure...see how huge thieve are they 🤧
@@BTinSF because the money is always taken back after it's looted by thieves
@@thevinayjangidit's not a real sum buddy.
It's a claim made by marxists
So don't take it seriously.
1) The brief burst of U.S. spending in 1896-1898 went mostly to a larger navy, and the rest for the Spanish-American War of 1898.
2) From the 1890s until World War 1, the UK built an astonishing number of battleships, several every year. The technology advanced so rapidly that some were already obsolete when they entered service. The other naval powers were the doing the same.
3) By the time the U.S. entered World War 1, the UK and France were financially spent. The U.S. provided the financing later in the war, but much of the weaponry the American army fought with in 1918 was French. The war ended before the U.S. arms industry could develop and build it own weapons. Enormous quantities of food, clothing, oil, and other military supplies were supplied by the U.S.
4) The massive military spending by the Soviet Union in the 1970s and '80s, and the consequent lack of money for everything else, was one of the causes of its collapse in the early '90s.
Dude your aid to India is $50mn while you looted from India $45 trillion. And very smartly you aid in India goes to NGOs of UK majority money goes back to Brits plus free pass degrade India's image thru those NGOs etc. Indians provide more aid to UK thru it's industrial employment in Britain. Study well before your century old info.
@@nag1010 I didn't say anything about India. Did you reply to the wrong person?
@@JPMadden no dear. Just spreading awareness coz ur comment had more likes.
Bursting brtis myths coz they r only told one side of story
Indians only told one side of story too…works that way everywhere. Just to spread some truth back to you.
@@jchristif on congrats 🤣 atleast our books and media have both side story unlike you only glorifying yourself everywhere
Did he said he gives india aid 🤣🤣🤣🤣
That's hilarious...shit thieves 🤣🤣
...well said in Hindi.... "100 Chuhe khake Billi chali Haj ko"🤣🤣🤣🤣
UK: We give aid, we give aid
India: Ok, where are the rest of $45 trillion you owe to me?
UK: 🥶😵💀
even with that much population Germany is still richer and they lost 2 world wars and still built up stronger than india😂
4:40 UK spending increasing. Yep, all that money looted from India 🇮🇳 🤣.
Facts
@@anmoldwivedi5403 britain lost money on the empire, we got richer getting rid of India.
@@bigenglishmonkey Brother, do you even know how much Britain had looted India in two hundred years...around 50 trillion dollar. They left us on ashes of gold and you are talking like this.. unbelievable
@@anmoldwivedi5403 yeah because that number is a lie created by a communist, and economists across the world have looked into it and even by steel-manning her positions they cant even get half that number.
Britain made fifty pence for every pound it spent on the empire, but if you believe that number then tell us wheres the money?
if that's how much money Britain got from India alone why is our GDP less than 3 trillion?
Bengal famine started (just like the other 120 recorded famines over the last 500 years) because of weather disasters, crop disease, and this time the Japanese invasion taking rice fields, and they sunk every ship Britain sent with food from Australia.
India- nah Britain did this.
the partition of India was demanded by Hindus and Muslims alike, then after we left you all started slaughtering each other.
India- nah this is Britain fault.
ive seen Indians blame Britain for deaths in both world wars while simultaneously bragging about being the biggest volunteer army in history.
im talking like this because as far as ive seen if it gives them another reason to hate Britain. then Indians will believe anything.
@@bigenglishmonkey wht are you talking about?
What abt English museums which are filled with indian historical Thing.
UK aid to India is extremely minuscule compared to what it looted from India during its 200+ year rule...keep that in mind...I don’t know why UK gives India few million pounds per year worth of aid...
It's not aid.. it's investments to create profit for them...
@dhirajmalapati268 donating money creates no profit. if you think otherwise than u support that India now gives money (from 2016-2021 it was around 2.3 billion pound) to UK? if not then you know now that you are talking bullshit. the reality is that - as everyone who is not blind knows - the western countries have the mentality/partly ideology to want to help everyone who is poor. plus, many NGOs want live form that and safe their existence - which results in permanent new narratives which reproduces such helper syndromes ...
What aid are these blokes talking about...It's the money they looted which they're returning...U see why their people are so down on education and awareness...
Let them live in their imaginary British empire. An Indian already rules them. 😂
It's pretty laughable when you said, that the aid that UK gives goes to military spending. 😂😂😂Compare £50m (UK's aid to India) to 71 billion USD you'll laugh yourself. Indian companies invest billions in UK every year and create employment in UK!! £50m is a charity that an Indian businessman can write off in a blink of an eye.
That is why we don't have free healthcare, we pay for the world's defense.
Exactly!
Pretty sure you won't even have that puny little island you call home. Gr00ming Gangs and all 😬
"The world's"? Nah.
"The democracies of the world?" Not even that.
"The USA and its lackeys?" Correct.
@@thegreatgatsby8180 Island? Im pretty sure the US is not an island, and it ain't puny either.
India is aid provider not aid receiver since 2008 so kindly stop living in fake superiority complex now India is 3 rd largest gdp in terms of ppp and 5 th largest in nominal terms
They are still stuck in their British era , now reduced to puny little island 😂
@@thegreatgatsby8180 yeah you are right
@@thegreatgatsby8180 so what looted our money and providing aids to us with our money that's how British is being developed by lotting other nations...harsh but true
@@thegreatgatsby8180 and also i spend more on my pocket money than the aid british gives to india...so think before you speak and also we came a long way from 1947 we're 4th strongest even after being looted by looters. And one of the fastest growing economies ..we know how to grow by our own not by other's money....again think and research strong before you speak.
@@utkarshawasthi1209 it helps to have more slaves than any other country.
Just FYI, U.S.'s budget jumped significantly in the 2000s because of 9/11. It was the primary cause for such a big increase, even though no other country was even close to their budget.
Brother again your comments on india very very outdated. British Aid to india is about 0.4% of india's GDP our government spent more on fertilizer subsidies.
PLZ check your facts and india spend 2% of GPD on defence. You talk about your aid like india is just run on your aid. Do you know why britain pay aid to india?????
Britain ruled india for almost 200 years during that time britishers killed indians looted india do not forget why they came to india to do trade brother.
I'm happy with today’s britishers (common people who had nothing to do with what those Britishers did to us) but not with your government and your Royal Family. And they should say sorry to india we are happy with that no need to give so called aid royal family they killed indians
not today's britishers. check out Bengal famine in 1943 killed 3.8million, jallianwala bagh massacre in 1919, 379 people were killed during open fire on protesters by british officer.
this is why you send aid not doing us a favor you talk like you are doing a favor. Britain stole 45trillions of today's money looted from india during british occupation
PLZ do reply share your thoughts. check india's share in world GDP after and before british occupation i know you do not know all the facts just read or see what media tell
but you can check all the facts if you want now india is 5th largest economy in the world behind US,China,Japan,Germany recently india overtook UK, of course in PPP terms because
of so much population individual indians are still poor. ruclips.net/video/mCgBQFhQGf0/видео.html
Stop quoting Shashi Tharoor like a buffoon. British Aid to India is not 0.4% of Indian GDP, its much less than that. A better counter is the fact that India gives $2.3 Billion in aid to other countries every year. Compared to the few tens of millions UK gives to India as aid.
And if you have a brain, instead of talking about the British Raj that they all know about, talk about how that British Aid is not aid but funds sent to NGOs to sabotage India's growth by organizing protests against infrastructure projects. Tell them about how Indian Government, since 2004, has been asking UK not to send this aid. Tell them about the FCRA law that had to be enacted to stop this menace of foreign money disguised as aid sent to India for waging economic war on India.
Be original in your comments.
@@death_parade The fact you are picking up is not also yours is it???? What are we experts we are not competing in tournament or something. We are normal people living their lives and saying something against what is wrong. You say they know all about britih raj Do they??? Do they know all??? They only know goody goody part they are not aware what those evil people did to us. If you quote modi's slogan or modi quote 's someone else's slogan does it make him duplicate or does it make you duplicate??? Like modi say world is one family does it make him duplicate???? What we talk or say about things and numbers or nice words someone else mentioned whose job is do that, we quote them. If you have peoblem with Shashi or with any other go there. Do not finger your arse here. Get the fuck out.
Be original like you consider your self, you fool
@@TGill22 So you are angry because I asked you to make an effort instead of copying what someone else said verbatim. Hmm...makes sense. There are people like you who are vulnerable to propaganda because they just pick up and _maro ratta_ of everything that catches their fancy but don't do a deeper internet study of things. And then there are people like me who are somewhat resilient to propaganda because of trying to look up facts and come to our own conclusions. Its not a competition, but when I see a fellow countryman who is vulnerable to propaganda, I try to pull him up to ensure India as a whole remains strong. I do my part. But I guess your stupid ego got in the way.
@@death_parade @Death Parade bro you did not asked you suggested. And I am not angry, you are angry because you commented not me. If Shashi presented facts i spread that facts this doesn't call copying. So does these facts are propogenda to you?????? If I was vulnerable to propogenda I would have believed in cow urine, modi great, congress is strong, india is dirty, indian army is weak, UK is the great country, China is great etc etc crap. You say you do research on deeper level what does it mean, if government give data you come up with something else??? You count indian population under 1billion??? Plz stop counting yourself almighty or high. I do not question your facts earlier they are true. Do not think only your facts are true and counting or saying what other told is not cool or something else. When we talk about india's economy before british raj and after british raj is it not ture???? We give or make others aware what their people did to us.
Does saying or giving indian deaths count is copying??? Because I did not count those myself???? How does it work???? When you have to make others aware you give facts it does not matter if
They said by someone else if they are true you can say billion times, because you are presenting or making others aware. Now you also said when you see a fellow countryman who is vulnerable to propaganda, you try to pull him up ensure india as a whole remains strong. Guess what you put crack because you feel this is all propogenda. Does my comment look propogenda to you???
You said you did your part but my stupid ego got in the way, you yourself think highly of you and I am egoistic person???
Bro come to reality tell me which part is propogenda
@@death_parade to propogenda is we are going to take back POK, propogenda is when they say india is better than China, propegenda is when they say india is superpower, propogenda is when they say india can compete with UK,USA,China, propogenda is when they say we kicked Chinese ass in galwan, propogenda is when people like you think this government is just perfect, previous were shot, propogenda is when people think previous government were perfect this is shit.
Reality is india is growing and will become superpower, and can challenge or kick Chinese ass, india will become superpower but not bigger than US, India can not take back POK until China become busy somewhere else, reality is Very different we all know. No one is falling for propogenda, unless you think Shashi's facts about british raj are propogenda
Daz spends more on cars
Dave spends more on hookers
Mike spends more on chicken
Sounds like Mike has his priorities right.
Go and check the data. Indian companies are providing jobs in the UK like Jaguar land rovers, Hamleys toys, TCS, Tetley, East India company, Tata steel etc. You should have proper knowledge before speaking anything about India.
UK provides aid to India?
How much is that exactly?
They are not a deep thinker, just enjoy bro.
0
2 billion.... f4om 1947 to 2022 🤣🤣🤣🤣
45 million eruos or dollars around something
@@funnyluci8686 india one year spending on military is 71 billion dollars ok
we give more fertilizer subsidy than your aid to us which is an apt metaphor for your argument.
3:46 Spain still has a monarchy
For your information your aid to India less than 1 % . Our country actually gives more aid to other countries. India is the second most foreign investor in the UK . Its time to change your colonial mind . If we are talking about the aid then what the 45 trillion looted from our country by the British and also many jewels and precious metals taken from our country. First of all returned the Kohinoor diamond in your queen's crown.
France is undersold on the chart as they maintained an arms industry well above what the countries military budget would lead to believe. This was done mostly via extensive foreign sales; throughout the Cold War (and afterwards) if you wanted to buy Western equipment, and either couldn't or wouldn't work with the US, then France was the go-to option.
Who would want to buy French weapons? The only thing coming out of those barrels is a white flag.
France supplied a lot to Israel.
@@bigbake132 people forget the US was fairly anti-Israel in its early years. You can actually see the military makeup of Israel shift in the decades following the two nations relationship improving to include significant amounts of American gear and similar reductions in French equipment, especially in terms of new orders.
Along with the budget I’d argue the US is also the most capable. That’s not always the case as Russia has shown many times over….
us defense spending for 2022 is 1.2-1.6 trillion dollars acording to the DoD
I am calling BS. Democrats have controlled all of congress and the presidency for the last two years, no way they would continue to pour money into the military. That is strictly a Republican and right wing goal, you are most likely mixing something up.
They are preparing for a potential altercation with China and North Korea very soon. After those wars happen then the US defence industry will drop again
to clear up any apparently ambiguous points I made in the original post here's it from the horse's mouth www.usaspending.gov/agency/department-of-defense?fy=2022
I read it was 801 billion
@@trevor3013 excluding DARPA, DIA, and the VA it is but if you look at what goes into the department of defense it's 1.6 trillion
India to UK - We don't want your aid.
UK to India - We will give you aid.
India to UK - We don't need your .
Uk to India - But we will give you.
Finally, India puts it's foot down we will not accept your aid.
UK - We will give to NGOs.
So lets cut long story short. UK is giving aid to NGOs and not to the government. As your aid is peanuts for our country .
Addition: To the missionaries in India
Christian missionaries
The aid provide to India is not to indian government but to Christian missionaries and ngo which historically always against india and also india provide aids to many country so don't be in illusion you are that important
Uk is one of the most important states in the world even more than india lol
@@anderson._.._.8801 yes you are right but for how long
@bhaumikgandhi5499 Well, india will surpass the uk, but even after that, they still have a permanent un seat, which alone makes them one of the most important states
@@anderson._.._.8801 india already surpassed uk. And having permanent seat is not important after all uk is usa's vassal state. Economy is everything. Your economy will reduce and our will grow. With rise in economy, expenditure in reserch and development budget rise. But although today expenditure in r&d is very less in india but gov is currently focusing on infrastructure so I'm not that worried
@bhaumikgandhi5499 india only recently surpassed the uk in gdp, and the uk is the 6 largest economy on the planet, which is very good so?
And "uk is a vassal of us" bro what😂?
Also I know the permanent un seat is not everything but even without it the uk is more important than india since the uk has military bases across the world due to its island all over the world while india is in aisa more important the uk is globally more important
Also, btw I m. Not from Britain I m german
India's gdp in 1700 ad is 33% of whole world
Pretty sure the next DOD budget had the military budget at like almost $940 billion
Takes a lot of money to be the biggest bullies in the world
@@numbone bullies huh
@@charliebaker1427 yah
♥ Happy Thanksgiving from America, blokes!
Uk doesnt provide Aid it has been 10-12 yrs well its was UK who wanted to give aid to say they have upper hand. And india gdp is higher than Uk and it will be double of UK gdp at the end of this decade.
Funniest part of this video 20:40 😂😂😂they send us aid😂😂😂🤣
This country portfolio review will examine how the UK’s aid programme in India has developed since the former Department for International Development stopped providing direct financial aid to the Indian government in 2015.
And much of these funding who knows where its going and what is being done.
Source ICAI.
Dont be half knowledge india gives more aid than it takes
The U.S military budget went up to 858 billion for 2023.
Before Brits looted India accounted for 25% of world GDP & 30% world trade. Thats more than combined of USA China Japan Germany 🤣🤭😂
as an american i laughed when they were making jokes about america being all in during wartime 😂😂
Fact : tata Steel is the largest employer in UK
in the UK tata steel employs just over 32,000 people, Tesco alone employs 350-400 thousand.
For india Britain sending their aid stopped nearly 20 years ago now it is investing in india where it gets more returns than it invests check your facts right just read your government published files of aid and investments in uk
I just thought that it would be hilarious if that famous Mexican futbol announcer (Goooooooool) would commentate on this. Specially early on when various countries were quickly going back and forth.
NATO requires 2% of GDP to be spent on military (even if alot of countries struggle to meet that), the USA is spending less than 4% of GDP. After watching the USA world bases video, you can understand why the budget is so much with so many troops stationed everywhere. I've seen a few reactors that are or were part of small Eastern European militaries, and they talk about how they liked having USA base in their country. Some pointed out how the only tanks they ever saw were US Abrams because their country just couldn't really afford them.
Werent u all alive for the disbandment of the soviet union in 1989 holy shit
1919 happens in the US just puts all their chips on the table 😂🤣
Whenever we get into a war our solution is to quadruple the military budget of whoever we are fighting, seems to work out so far
Since I'm sure it'll be talked about, it's worth pointing out that using sheer numbers can be misleading. For instance, I'm American and we have by far the highest military spending by raw number but it's only about 3.4% of our GDP, a much better measurement.We're 13th on the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute's Military Expenditure Database for 2019(I'm using the sources cited on Wikipedia's "List of countries by expenditures" page since RUclips isn't a huge fan of external links), well behind #1 Oman and for 2020, we don't even make the top 15 of another database's measurements. Not bad for a superpower.
The U.S. still spends way to much on the military.
If we were number 1 in gdp we’d need to be in more wars.
still a stupid use of our money. We throw away billions intentionally every year
you’re an american? can i have your autograph i’ve always wanted to meet a movie star! 😩
Aren’t you glad we are allies 😀 I am.
As an American, military spending is the ONLY thing I don't mind my taxes going to at all. I will never complain about that part. I want our men to be as safe and successful as possible and always have an advantage, and I will happily open my wallet for that.
In 2022 the Department of Defense had a budget of 1.64 trillion USD distributed to all of its military branches
No one has a budget of 1.64 trillion only the USA has a 900 billion dollar defence budget.
@Khabib Supremacy the 900 billion budget is the budget on paper. There are people who've worked with the U.N. before the pentagon that tried to investigate how much exactly we spend. The only thing they learned was we spend waaaaay more than what's on paper and there's no real way of knowing because our government does alot of things off the books so to speak and none can be tracked.
@Khabib Supremacy also I'm proud for Indias economy ❤️✌️love seeing others prosper
@khabibsupremacy4382 "Each year federal agencies receive funding from Congress, known as budgetary resources . In FY 2023, the Department of Defense (DOD) had $1.98 Trillion distributed among its 6 sub-components." (USA spending dot gov)
To be honest I'm not sure what this means. Perhaps the yearly budget adds to this total? I'm not sure exactly how it works
It's still unbelievable how the Germans keep rising from the ashes. I think logically that this country is the only thing that could do that because of the mentality. Germany the land of poets and thinkers. Everyone worked non-stop. And now you have to include that Germany doesn't have good natural resources.. Unbelievable.
Uk gives aid to Christian missionary NGOs , not to Indian government. it's been on record kindly read your own government site.
I love how British people make fun of France for surrendering so fast during world war 2 when the British are largely responsible for that happening not the French.
Not to mention that British won because of Indians and Indian money. Without India as their crown 👑, they are reduced to a puny little island.
As people are pointing out with GDP. The US spends 3 percent for 800 billion in 2021 while in 2021 Saudi Arabian spent 6 percent for 40 billion. Imagine if the us spent 6 percent instead. Also even though the US spends more money every year, it's projected that the amount of GDP spent will decrease by 2032 to 2.7. that's madness
Also in 1991 the Soviet union didn't just disband. It collapsed economically and disbanded. Also you mentioned the exponential growth of wealth, which can be attributed to the British Empire and United States which promoted free trade and both countries adopted alliances after WW2 which increased trade and wealth worldwide
Also that increase in the 1900s post ww1 was definitely for defense. The US was the largest economy already by that point but was completely defenseless aside from the two oceans protecting it. It became increasingly necessary to have a bigger military
Indian Gov. already denied Britains aid but they insist to give according to some Geopolitical interest. Actually British aid gives to Christian missionaries and other Brit. led NGOs(not to Gov.) for safeguarding their interest in india and converting peoples of india to Christian through providing livelihood facilities . Somewhere they succeed at some parts of the regions like South India and specially Northeast .
as far as I know, italy technically had a monarchy all the way to ww2. The king sorta kinda told Mussolini to attack rome and take over the government... aleggedly.
"US: Stop playing with your pretend money." LMAO
Reason why Soviets surged from the 70s and 80s is because they started spending mind boggling amounts on the military which led to their downfall, leaders of the SSRs even complained about the expenditure, kinda the reason why they dissolved.
You send aid to us which is peanuts. Ok . We give more aid to others compared to what you give. Also what you stole from us is 45 Trillions and giving back some millions is nothing compared to that.
It is odd about Brazil's spending as one of the treaties it has is mutual aid from all North and South American countries if attacked. This includes the USA coming to its aid.
Sorry guys for disappointing you but UK's aid to INDIA is just comes for missionaries and churches...While UK looted $45 trillion from India during the period 1765 to 1938. UK's aid to INDIA is $2 billion so it's laughable to compare such things...😇
I like how Dave calls them "Sneaky Germans".
The exact kind of comment I'd expect from a sneaky ginger.
Hlo, i never commented before but some words made me comment
do not use word swastika hitler did not used swastika he used hakenkreuzor hooked cross which was used in church all around the world, it was a symbol of peace in all religions.
and hitler hated indians he said it is good thing britishers control india because they are meant to control, that we(germans) are pure race Aryans and aryans who travelled to india
become lower by mixing in them. He showed himself as christian made banners about that etc etc. point is he hated us(indians) then why he will steal our symbol of peace???
he used christian symbol not indian, a person who translated mein kampf into english 2nd time in 1939 by james murphy he was a christian priest he used swastika for Hakenkreuz for
the first time because in first mein kampf translation91931)they used hooked cross, arizona quaterly used the word gammadion minded for hitler and his followers published around 1946
An american movie in 1959 or 1960 used word swastika and connected it with evil and made it common. Very sad to see this how people use this against us. Soviet used sickle and
hammer they also killed millions should we abandon these tools?? A video that explain all this- ruclips.net/video/YxvBFytl5aE/видео.html
It would be interesting to see a similar video based on countries spending as a percentage of their total GDP because I think Saudi Arabia is the highest
India is net aid country ...hope u know what it means
USA aid policy is like today's cashback offer to purchase their arms.
some millions of dollars is a big amount for britishers😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 "we give millions of dollars aid to India". In the meantime india spent 75 billion dollars on defence and give billions of dollars aid to countries around the world.
January 3, 2024: the United States now spends approximately $900 billion per year.
Many of the pre-1914 spurts by various countries were caused by the modernization and expansion of navies in the new Dreadnought era. Even South American countries got into naval arms races.
The United States defense budget isn't just for manufacturing and maintaining arms, but for the research that keeps the new weapons systems at the cutting edge to defeat any potential rivals. China has a big military budget, but many of the weapons systems they build and buy with it can be decades behind those of the West.
If you've ever wondered why the US doesn't have universal healthcare there you go.
the defense budget is big compared to other nations but it isn't a big part of our GDP. The US doesn't have Universal Healthcare purely for political/economic (not related to inability to budget for it; they prefer free market)/philosophical reasons.
The defense allocation is 3% of the US GDP and has almost steadily gone down since 2010..in 2024 it is projected to be 2.7%
@@scottb3034 Exactly. I really don’t know why so many people love to point the finger at the defense budget when they want to start griping about some other spending they would like to see that isn’t happening (as if a lower defense budget would imply a sudden increase in everything else). Somehow so many continue to bang on that ignorant drum and repeat those shockingly naive and lazy talking points.
@@Antonio-wh3oq they should really be going after congress for its billion dollar budget
@@Antonio-wh3oq Lol what
US spends 3.09% of its gdp on military.
India spends 2.5%
China spends 1.9%
@@balajeepratham8200 And your point is what? The US could/would fund trillions in other spending if it lowered its defense budget by 1% of GDP?
No, the German Empire didn't change to the 'Third Reich'... There was something known as the 'Weimar Republic' in between. The German Empire ended in 1919/1920.
11:63 USSR broke up in 1991.
2:13 France's spending increases and Daz goes "France fell off the cliff. Then it decreases and Daz goes "France bouncing back." Those visual changes were mostly because of Russia's dramatic shifts. Man can't interpret charts :D
It's not aid it's MI 5 MISSION ( COVERT)
I took a big gulp of beer around the 9:13 mark and when Daz said "France retreated quickly..." A few seconds later I spewed it all over my wife and dog. Thanks blokes
Combined wife and dog?
*Le beep le beep* & * hhhonk hhhonk* took me out lol
France has the most successful military history in Europe
@@rinhyugaa6565 successfully running away
@@ericmcdonough8193 just in overall victories
you cant convert local currency into USD, it doesn't work like that. It has to be adjusted to Purchasing power index (PPI) . $10 billion in US buys far less than $10 Billion in Russia which can be as much as 2-10x. All of these charts dont give you the real picture
Money spent can't be converted into money spent 🤔. Is that like saying the metric system is different in Russia than it is in France? Lmao
I just came to know about a month or so ago that India and the US have a training school high up in the Himalayas, where spies are trained before being sent into China, Afghanistan, Oman, Qatar, Pakistan and other such volatile countries. I live close by and i never knew about it. I only got to know of it recently and everyone understands the reason why it is secretive, so we don't talk about it's location at all.
The US army used to visit this place (among others) for HAWS (High Altitude Warfare School) but i never knew that it also served as a decoy for placing new trainees in the school.
Fun fact:- It might also be a torture chamber as the mountain people regularly find skulls and bones nearby. They may be the work of local criminals or even Tigers and Leopards, but these animals generally don't go after humans so it's unlikely.
it's so secretive that you never talk about it, except publicly on the internet
@@pointlessmanatee Nice try but the Himalayas are huge and we don't disclose the location so good luck finding it.
You bet your smart @$$ will get the location, don't you.
@John Doe India is already in geopolitics since two decades, so...
I guess the skidmarks are in your brain.
Thats not training school .they do yearly training exercise as US is not ised to mountain warfare
@@user-kj5uy1hh2d we have the biggest toilet called Pakistan
I've had a beer or two but god damn it OB Mike is a gem man
You guys seem unaware of several wars that certainly affected military spending such as the Franco-German War in the 1870s, the Spanish-American War in the 1890s and the Russo-Japanese War in 1905.
More recently, Reagan became US President in 1982 with a promise to increase military spending which he did and essentially bankrupted the Soviet Union forcing it to try to keep up. It collapsed in 1989 and under Yeltsin had a very bad economy so it's not surprising their military spending was very low for a while. I forget exactly when Putin came in but I suspect that would be when Russian spending started to grow again.
It's not swastika, it's called hooked cross. Stop calling it swastika.
First know India is giving more aid than compare to recieve 🤦
🙏🙏 German never use swastika they use their christian hakenkrez symbol 🇮🇳🇮🇳🚩🚩
Hitler symbol wasn't swastika, it was hakencross
The quick drop you saw in France during 1940 was them getting invaded by, and quickly capitulating to the Nazis
The large increase for USA at end of 19th century was the building of a large, modern naval fleet.. The dreadnought period
Please react to "insane american plan to invade japan" you guys will love it and its very interesting!
Op Downfall, right? Hard to know how much of that is propaganda given its the primary justification given for using the A-bombs. 6 million Allied troops landing, bigger than Op Overlord, etc, etc. Not saying it was completely wrong, but could easily be an inflated numbers case.
Don't forget America's black projects which we have no idea what they spend
I'm pretty sure every country on this list doesn't fully disclose everything
I was just waiting for 4 points...
1) The Early 1900s...
2) The 1940s
3) 1955 to 1985
4) 2001
India Stopped Taking AID ages ago. Update urself.
Britain aid to India is equivalent to Indian govts expenditure on a single Village
Power shifted people from united Kingdom to united states..
Meanwhile, Venezuelan inflation...
"You wanna see real speed?"
Uk sending aid to india?? 😂😂
It sounds like a lot but it’s only a drop in the bucket of the budget for the USA. Military Spending is a big bogey man buzzword but in reality it’s not much. Social Security and Medicaid are both well above military spending, for example.
Only roughly 3% and actually it is dropping in terms of % of the GDP.
A flag changes when a new official national flag is selected by the country. Simple.
You guys are misinformed it seems .....indian gov does not accept foreign aid.....the aid if comes goes to NGOs run by UK gov in india ..... Also india is a net aid provider...
Poland was under Russia's thumb from 1946 to 1990ish.
I miss dave.