The future of migration | Nobel Week Dialogue 2023
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 16 окт 2024
- An unprecedented conversation between leaders of the world’s leading humanitarian organisations, two of whom are Nobel Prize recipients. Jagan Chapagain of peace laureate the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC), Mark Manly of peace prize recipient the UNHCR and Amy Pope of the International Organization for Migration come together to respond to the refugee crisis, offering unique perspectives and solutions. The dialogue is succinctly encapsulated by Jagan Chapagain: “We need to see migration as a human issue, rather than a legal, political, or criminal issue.”
From our earliest beginnings, humanity has been on the move. Migration is our past, one of our present’s burning issues and, like it or not, it will be a defining feature of our future.
Time and again, our society has been shaped and reshaped by migrations. Everything suggests that the factors driving people to seek a new life elsewhere will only multiply. Whether forced by starvation or war, by our changing climate, or by the simple human desire to seek a better life elsewhere in the face of inequality, we humans will always be migrants.
Nobel Week Dialogue 2023 brought people together from across the spectrum of science, society and culture to explore the future of migration and how to approach that future. How we think about migration is one of the most pressing and important conversations we can have.
Delving into humanity’s intermingled origins, we asked what the past can tell us about what will come. Surveying the current picture of human resettlement, we discussed how the world is responding. Looking ahead, we investigate what steps we should take to assist and prepare.
In partnership with Carl Bennet AB; City of Gothenburg; Region Västra Götaland; Volvo.
Supporting foundation: Sten A. Olssons Stiftelse För Forskning och Kultur
Economic migration is devastating our economies here in Africa (and global south in general). Aid and remittances do NOT replace the value of middle class workers we are losing to the rich world. This is actually an economic injustice. Transferring human capital from the poorest countries in the world to the richest parts.
How ironic that the business community who benifit most from cheap non unionised labour tend to vote for political parties most keen to stop it.
Because they are against supporting any immigration they think they can force the cream of the crop to come to them. However, the cream will go to the better paying people, countries, companies. So being the lowest common denominator, those against immigration will become less competitive. They’re doing themselves in because they’re not supporting a system that would support their business.
Absolutely wrong…. These businesses have been voting pro-migration for DECADES it’s the citizens of these European nations who vote for less migration not corporations…..
Proper reform should be adressed for refugees .The place of refugees in many places are so miserable like as the refugees in Bangladesh the native of burma.Migration is necessary to build a linkage among contries.
If we explicitly consider the matter from the very ending of nineteenth century, we can see that migration gradually grows however what is the reason behind of it? Very sadly the most significant thing is world political. Take a look which country is instability with wars like Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, yemen, Ukraine, Myanmar are heading to migrants in another countries. If we want to get a migrant solution, we should bring the stability in our geopolitical
Thank you for this enlightening conversation. A far cry from the Eurocentric migrant phobia. In the Philippines 10 percent of our population live or work overseas. Their remittances keep our economy afloat. At the same time we have always been open and kind to refugees--- Jews,white Russians, Vietnamese. Right now a lot of Westerners also migrate here during their retirement years. Compare this to the xenophobic attitude of countries like Japan and the ageing societies of Europe...
This was so enlightening. I think migration is what we are. Pilgrims.
exploitative nations
NEED MORE PEOPLE WILLING TO BE PAID POORLY -- first minute
If AI and robots are solution to everything, would we still need so much migrant influx in the western world. Also if 40 years by now, all jobs are gone or transformed and basically we have literally robots working for us, what's the value of money then in that time ? And will we see something like start of Universal Basic Income? My gosh i m just putting way too much mind on this AI thing
Hi I'm Ariful Islam leeton Software Developer and members of the international organization WHO and investors Public and Private sector and Development World economic Forum
Love to hear from the best , they are always so concise and informative
Thank you share beautiful Video❤Migration problems of d❤ays for chose,...🌍
Most of the big corporations are not very clear what is the skill gap that they are looking far as skill requiremnts are changing very fast being dyanamic. The suggestion could be , that such multinational corporations can set up training centers in those potential migrant countries and train potential skilled people and then allow them to officially migrate. One of the basic requirement is teaching adoptability in dynamic skill requirements as a trait
Yes sir
Very important discourse.
To day with AI the requirement of skilled workers will come down all over the world. But the problem of ethics, honesty, doing good to society has to be inculcated to children right from kindergarden failing which we will have more intelligent terrirost all over the world. Do you think children of Ukrane, Afganisthan and of late Palestanian will ever improve their soft skill and become good adult. Hence all these fund giving organisation should concentrate on children of refugee as they are going to become future citizen of the world.
Please return
I Love All Noble 🙏🇱🇰🌻🌟🥇🌷
My Hero All Noble 💛🧡💜🖤💙❤
Stopping migration? Utilize proper terminology please. In addition, stop gas lighting geopolitical + economic scenario using a historical irrelevant scientific platform. You all are smart enough to know better.
Way not AI & robot
Which ever developed country is exploiting the natural resources of poor countries i say e.g in Africa, should be asked to take higher % of age of migrants from that country to their own country or their finacial contribution should be more to UN agencies.