Sir thanks a lot for that practical explanation in the last, it was really good and I bet none of the other teachers had done that before... Again thank you so much...🙏🙏
Thanks for the exampel., the same example was given by my school teacher but i was note able to reconnect with that you cleared my concept once again! Thnx
See the figure taken from Halliday,Resnick and Walker, Fundamentals of physics, Fifth Edition, page 243. This figure clearly and easily explains that finite rotation is not vector.
Here we are talking about the quantity which has direction, But it is not treated as vector. Current has direction but it is treated as scalar because it does not obey vector addition law. These are special cases
Sir thanks a lot for that practical explanation in the last, it was really good and I bet none of the other teachers had done that before... Again thank you so much...🙏🙏
I have not seen such an amazing physics teacher in my life
THANKS A LOT ☺️
Wow sir great explanation 👍👍👍
Thanks for the exampel., the same example was given by my school teacher but i was note able to reconnect with that you cleared my concept once again! Thnx
Perfect explanation.... 👌👌👌👌👌
sir best explanation i have ever seen thanks a lot sir
A lots of thanks.
PRANAM
awesome explanation sir!!
Thanks alot sir❤
very good explanation thank you
See the figure taken from Halliday,Resnick and Walker, Fundamentals of physics, Fifth Edition, page 243. This figure clearly and easily explains that finite rotation is not vector.
Perfect explanation....
Nice video sir
Doubt : Till what range will angular displacement be considered a small angle ie vector ??
There is no such range ... it's just considered very small i.e d(pie)
excellent explanation sir .
Perfect sir
Thank you so much sir
Gr8 teaching
Sir i understood it very well tha ks sir
Thank you sir
Wow na badhiya se samjha
Excellent sir
Tq sir
Nyc
❤❤
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Pranam sir lsie ho aap
But if we give rotation only in horizontal then??
In 3 d motion that happens but in 2d motion we can treat finite angular displacements as vectors
Mass is scaler quantity does it mean it will not follow a+b=b+a
Here we are talking about the quantity which has direction, But it is not treated as vector.
Current has direction but it is treated as scalar because it does not obey vector addition law.
These are special cases
Aap to shuperustam nikle