Inside Advanced US Megafactories Building Billion $ of Futuristic F-35 Engines

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 10 апр 2023
  • Welcome back to the FLUCTUS channel for a discussion about how the world’s most advanced jet engines are manufactured and how companies are making them more efficient for the future.
    Fluctus is a website and RUclips channel dedicated to sea geeks. Whenever you are curious or an incorrigible lover of this mysterious world, our videos are made for you !
    We publish 3 videos a week on our RUclips channel and many more articles on our website.
    Feel free to subscribe to not miss any of our updates and visit our website to discover additional content.
    Don’t forget to follow us on twitter:
    / fluctusofficial
    Please keep the comments section respectful. Any spam, insults or troll will be deleted.
    To contact us, make sure to use our email in the about section of this channel.

Комментарии • 272

  • @KO-pk7df
    @KO-pk7df Год назад +18

    The F-35B does not have a vertical engine. The front Lift-Fan is driven off the one jet engine Pratt & Whitney F135-PW-600 via the Rolls-Royce Lift-System.

  • @glencrandall7051
    @glencrandall7051 Год назад +14

    Almost 100 years of evolution. Amazing progress. Thank you for sharing. Have a great day and stay safe. 🙂🙂

    • @TheMrgoodmanners
      @TheMrgoodmanners Год назад +1

      What evolution? We've had jet powered flight for more than 70yrs now

  • @robertojpaez9354
    @robertojpaez9354 Год назад +5

    Very impressive and nice the full electric prototipe Aviation Spirit

  • @SparklySpencer
    @SparklySpencer Год назад +3

    Hush Houses, NASA, and jet engines, fun times!

  • @j.fiminio
    @j.fiminio 7 месяцев назад

    As novidades tecnológicas, cada vez mais presentes . . . .
    👍😀🇧🇷

  • @TheDustysix
    @TheDustysix Год назад +5

    The F-35B Lift Fan is Not a separate engine. It is Shaft driven off the F-135-PW-600 Engine.

  • @asadbhuiyan5719
    @asadbhuiyan5719 Год назад +3

    ❤God bless USA,, and respect ❤, Great job

  • @garymiller5937
    @garymiller5937 Год назад +41

    Pretty amazing things they do. I'm impressed.😊

    • @pitech4446
      @pitech4446 6 месяцев назад

      this is why USA is number#1, this is just one national security industry, just look at how many national security we have.

  • @javierjavier-ht3yu
    @javierjavier-ht3yu 10 месяцев назад +1

    interesting way to explain how works a plane engine , despite I´ve never flying on a plane.

  • @Clonefiles
    @Clonefiles Год назад +1

    Top f35 fighter jets us military ☝

  • @sarcof3459
    @sarcof3459 10 месяцев назад +4

    It's crazy how many parts the engine has.

  • @user-vb5sr7hf5y
    @user-vb5sr7hf5y 10 месяцев назад +4

    It's crazy how many parts the engine has.. Hush Houses, NASA, and jet engines, fun times!.

  • @vocaloiddownloader6461
    @vocaloiddownloader6461 Год назад +1

    試作機じゃなく量産する為の工場には膨大な資金と職人的人材要るんだろうな…て感じる

  • @benz9063
    @benz9063 Год назад +1

    hope the overheating issue is not going to affect the new units produced.

  • @namvu1472
    @namvu1472 11 месяцев назад

    Ok 🥰 thật kinh khủng cho nhà máy rất tiện tiền ok 🥰 rất tuyệt vời

  • @jijaji5363
    @jijaji5363 Год назад

    Yes definitely I enjoy your videos always tnxxxx from India 🇮🇳 ❤

  • @user-xy5ho7yt6h
    @user-xy5ho7yt6h 7 месяцев назад

    تجمع من دول المانياء وروسياء السباقتا لهذا الاختراع والتصنيع

  • @SuperSaiyan3985
    @SuperSaiyan3985 11 месяцев назад +7

    That is not a vertical engine on the F-35B. It’s called a LiftFan and it’s powered directly by the engine’s torque.

  • @Rodrigo_Lima445
    @Rodrigo_Lima445 Год назад +1

    awesome logistics!

  • @RazelDiel-vh9tp
    @RazelDiel-vh9tp 7 месяцев назад

    Slightly interested

  • @nelsonalmeida3979
    @nelsonalmeida3979 Год назад +5

    Muito bom as informações

  • @Ali_Ercan
    @Ali_Ercan Год назад +5

    I have enjoyed the video. Thank you..

  • @xiaoleicao5534
    @xiaoleicao5534 9 месяцев назад

    大国工匠,文明的起源

  • @HRHolm-bi6zu
    @HRHolm-bi6zu Год назад +20

    Man, would I have loved to have been a jet engine assembly technician with a career spanning, say, 40 years. Would certainly have earned good pay with a solid retirement fund accumulation at the end.

    • @rael5469
      @rael5469 Год назад

      "good pay with a solid retirement fund accumulation at the end."
      Don't bet on it. The aviation industry is a wretched hive of scum and villainy. Tens of thousands of lives have been destroyed by robber baron corporate thieves. I hate to say it. I wish it were otherwise.

    • @ChinaChuck
      @ChinaChuck Год назад +6

      My dad worked for Lockheed Martin over the course of 42 years. However, he was laid off three times, one of those long enough that he felt like an unwanted burden upon the family and contemplated suicide to help us. Fortunately a job at Siemens came available at just the right moment. Praise God! Dad finally retired with credit for 29 years.
      PS: He retired while the F-22 was wrapping up and I loved the rare opportunity to tour the factory. I was amazed how big the engines are on both the F-22 and F-35.

    • @HRHolm-bi6zu
      @HRHolm-bi6zu Год назад +5

      @@ChinaChuck Glad it worked out well for him in the end. "Looks Like He Made It."

    • @Chris_at_Home
      @Chris_at_Home Год назад +3

      I worked on the assembly floor of P&WA a couple of years in the late 1970s. It was a cool job with good pay and benefits. I did well there Electronics was my thing and I quit. I was an avionics tech on P-3 Orions in the Navy. I was making over 3 times what I made at P&WA in a couple years doing electronics work in Alaskas oil field. I retired from AT&T doing communications along the pipeline and working a gateway satellite earth station. My oldest brother was the 3rd generation to retire from P&WA. My dad worked on a rocket engines in W Palm Beach in the early 1960s and then on the Apollo fuel cell in Connecticut. Heck, my best friend growing up ended up a manager in engineering. He had a degree in metallurgy.

    • @gerardosalazar161
      @gerardosalazar161 Год назад

      Why didn’t you? What happened?

  • @Bergondora
    @Bergondora 11 месяцев назад +1

    At 1:54 it's not even mentioned that the fan at the front generates most of the thrust. Also the turbine stages after combustion seems to be described as a compressor.

  • @sherzaman550
    @sherzaman550 Год назад

    Good but its goodness should not be limited it should reach to All of the humanity and to All of the living species,

  • @Pixx4you
    @Pixx4you 10 месяцев назад

    The engine is the star of the show..!

  • @timmainson
    @timmainson Год назад

    This is a rehashed style of 16mm films we would watch in Jr.High.

  • @thusuongtranthi334
    @thusuongtranthi334 Год назад

    Người ta phải làm nhà để cất máy bay lúc không sử dụng.. vì chuột và dan sẽ chui vào căn dây điện và làm tổ trong máy bay.

  • @barrysrcdump3557
    @barrysrcdump3557 Год назад +7

    I thought the F-35 had a single engine and a shaft drive to the forward lift fan, through adjustable clutches.
    Silly me. 🤷‍♂️

    • @SuperSaiyan3985
      @SuperSaiyan3985 11 месяцев назад +2

      LOL no you’re exactly right, the video’s wrong.

  • @VoTrongSang
    @VoTrongSang 10 месяцев назад

    Looks great everyone 😍

  • @davewilkirson2320
    @davewilkirson2320 10 месяцев назад +3

    Enjoyed it. Very well done.

  • @ahmedzakarya306
    @ahmedzakarya306 8 месяцев назад

    We need this❤❤🇪🇬👍💪🇱🇷🇱🇷

  • @ioanbota9397
    @ioanbota9397 Год назад

    Realy I like this factory so much

  • @sultonisimorangkir1303
    @sultonisimorangkir1303 Год назад

    Thankyu for sharing ,thankyu for genius Enginearing Turbine

  • @ProxolodRu
    @ProxolodRu 2 месяца назад

    Очень красивый двигатель

  • @mustafaibrisevic7492
    @mustafaibrisevic7492 10 месяцев назад

    Aferim za tehnologiju.

  • @Istandby666
    @Istandby666 11 месяцев назад +16

    I was at Edwards Air Force Base during the testing of this aircraft.
    The reason the 35 was built, was to give the u.s. a plane they could sell.
    The technology on the 22, is still top secret and when it goes out of service, it will still be top secret.
    The closet plane today to the 22 is the B-21.
    If you still think these aircraft are advanced, you should have seen what was being developed in the early 90's.

    • @HonISfirE
      @HonISfirE 6 месяцев назад

      early 90's? any example?

  • @spankflaps1365
    @spankflaps1365 Год назад +3

    A billion dollars for the engine, then a billion dollars for a landing strip that can withstand the heat, then another billion when it sucks in a bird.

    • @gbengaajayi6462
      @gbengaajayi6462 Год назад

      😆😩

    • @winstonpoplin
      @winstonpoplin Год назад +2

      A Boeing 747's engine can cost from 700,000 to 1.5 million. Nowhere close to a billion. And one of these engine can suck in many small birds with no issues. Though larger birds like geese can cause a problem but that is very rare.

    • @nate4745
      @nate4745 Год назад +2

      A billion dollars ain't worth that much anymore. It's not only the engine costing more but also the dollars having less value. It's called 'Inflationary Spending'. If a thing costs a dollar and the government doubles the amount of dollars in circulation, that thing will cost two dollars.

  • @HartsPerformance
    @HartsPerformance Год назад +25

    I get to test the f135 engines here in Oklahoma. They are pretty insane in person. Getting up close to all the machining and engineering on each part is amazing. Not all your facts were correct tho. Still a great video none the less

    • @TheMrgoodmanners
      @TheMrgoodmanners Год назад +1

      They aren't that amazing. The f16, f18 and certainly f15 have better engines. Whats so mesmerizing abt this plane?

    • @benoitlaferriere8581
      @benoitlaferriere8581 Год назад +3

      Dependable engines

    • @forzaelite1248
      @forzaelite1248 Год назад +9

      ​@@TheMrgoodmannersthey make more power than the engines in any of the aircraft you just mentioned, and in the case of the Hornet it makes more power than its 2 engines and ties with the Super Hornet's improved twin engines. It's not even a completely bespoke design, having sourced from the F119 and still manages to power both the aircraft and numerous systems onboard that would likely fry legacy fighters trying to run them.

    • @timmainson
      @timmainson Год назад +3

      @@forzaelite1248 Well said. this. engine is the evolution of the F119 and proud to be so. The difference in performance between the F-35 and. F15 stem from differences. in aerodynamics and USAF changes in doctrines.

    • @terryingram7419
      @terryingram7419 10 месяцев назад +2

      You get to test F 35 engines you must be at Tinker I used to work on TF 30- P109

  • @xXNURBSXx
    @xXNURBSXx Год назад

    Future looks so bright.

  • @bayramtekin5656
    @bayramtekin5656 Год назад

    Ne varsa teknolojide var, her alanda, gozunu seveyim teknolojinin, teknolojiye zamaninda ayak uyduran aya uydurmayan yaya kalmaya mahkumdur bu her alanda boyle,

  • @vibrasieve
    @vibrasieve 3 месяца назад

    The airplane engine is a great invention

  • @ervandadamyan5222
    @ervandadamyan5222 10 месяцев назад

    I really liked the video👍amazing technology . 😎

  • @bengkels2m577
    @bengkels2m577 Год назад

    Impressive work....

  • @brahmburgers
    @brahmburgers 10 месяцев назад

    Is there a cooler job, than being a test pilot on that electric motor driven plane (shown at the end of the video)?

  • @BigEightiesNewWave
    @BigEightiesNewWave 6 месяцев назад

    Gimme a B777 with GE-90s😍

  • @imransharif443
    @imransharif443 11 месяцев назад

    Very best Engine nice Engineering

  • @kjh71717
    @kjh71717 5 месяцев назад

    외계인을 잘 고문했네

  • @howtousemetallathemachines6478
    @howtousemetallathemachines6478 10 месяцев назад

    Excellent , Thank you👍

  • @user-qk4ey3qt8q
    @user-qk4ey3qt8q Год назад

    버너토오치사출부분설계좋다

  • @esatozcubuk4530
    @esatozcubuk4530 Год назад

    En ufak hataları olduğunda düşerler, hiçbir riske giremezler ve takip edilen bu felsefenin de ağır bir bedeli var. Bu arada, bazı şeyleri bu felsefeyle asla üretemeyecekler.

  • @BrianFitzGerald-TheSkySurfer
    @BrianFitzGerald-TheSkySurfer 4 месяца назад

    You state that the F-35B VTOL model has an engine behind the cockpit that "points up" in addition to its propulsion engine. That is not correct. The F-35 has ONE engine that drives a ducted fan for vertical takeoff.

  • @md.jahangiralam1509
    @md.jahangiralam1509 10 месяцев назад

    Very much interested in looking into the machine like aircraft engine,
    If I could be an aeronautical engineering part....

  • @D-One
    @D-One 2 месяца назад

    This sounded normal at 2x speed.

  • @tanpengjoo7205
    @tanpengjoo7205 10 месяцев назад +2

    MADE IN USA ALWAYS MOST ADVANCED N POWERFUL. IF ITS NOT THE MOST ADVANCED THEN IT WONT BE NAMED AMERICA. JUST ASKED HOW MANY COUNTRIES IN THE WORLD ARE FLYING MADE IN USA AIRCRAFT, EVEN THE RICHEST OIL COUNTRIES MUST BUY AIRCRAFT FROM AMERICA.

  • @musaaq.12
    @musaaq.12 10 месяцев назад

    Luar biasa..👍

  • @BigEightiesNewWave
    @BigEightiesNewWave 6 месяцев назад

    Electric motor cannot do this for more than a tiny 2-man plane that flies a few minutes.😂

  • @user-qk4ey3qt8q
    @user-qk4ey3qt8q Год назад

    축복이있으라

  • @kailashsingh9737
    @kailashsingh9737 Год назад

    Very beautiful sweet sir Tq so much ji

  • @93200Jonas
    @93200Jonas Год назад

    Show us the engine secret F35 please 🤓🧐🇨🇵

  • @omerbayindir3997
    @omerbayindir3997 Год назад

    MİLYAR DOLARLIK...? TRİLYON DOLARLIK OLMASIN....::::))))))

  • @EagleFighterJet
    @EagleFighterJet 5 месяцев назад

    I'm impressed

  • @sharaddhabudade5776
    @sharaddhabudade5776 10 месяцев назад

    Like yeah it creates more power to fly though what you think

  • @olalekanolawale9515
    @olalekanolawale9515 10 месяцев назад

    am a nigerian please am fully interesting to be an aerotonic engineering

  • @ruk2023--
    @ruk2023-- Год назад +1

    Hundreds of moving parts? At most a jet engine has 5 moving parts, some people would say 1.

  • @mohamedbaza9573
    @mohamedbaza9573 10 месяцев назад

    Have a nice day my dear friends.

  • @user-eo4xt2ov5e
    @user-eo4xt2ov5e 9 месяцев назад

    Sekomplek itukah mesin pesawat terbang atau mungkin sengaja dibuat rumit agar tidak ada yang meniru.

  • @company6676
    @company6676 Месяц назад

    thank you❤❤

  • @fiseliaa7105
    @fiseliaa7105 11 месяцев назад

    dobel turbin.canggih

  • @holywells
    @holywells 10 месяцев назад +4

    Electric aircraft ?? Imagine the weight of the battery pack, even for lightweight aircraft!! Pilot to tower: "I'm declaring an emergency!" Tower: "What's your problem?" Pilot: "My batteries are dead!!"

    • @nikspanakis
      @nikspanakis 10 месяцев назад +1

      Or "This is your Captain speaking. Passengers with fully charged phones are kindly requested to connect your phones to the connectors under your seat. Apply to flight personnel for more information, but for God's sake, do it fast "

  • @user-cb8hb3el8b
    @user-cb8hb3el8b 10 месяцев назад

    F-35s fall very often

  • @johnjr3870
    @johnjr3870 Год назад +26

    Jet engine do not have 1000s of moving parts, some assemblies have 100s of parts, but operate as a unit. The F35 does not have a front vertical engine, it has a "FAN" driven off the main engine

    • @shannonjurgens3667
      @shannonjurgens3667 Год назад +2

      Modern engines do indeed have a thousand moving parts. Just the IGV system alone has several hundred.

    • @bountyhuntermk2520
      @bountyhuntermk2520 Год назад +2

      Keep the noise down little man

    • @forzaelite1248
      @forzaelite1248 Год назад +1

      ​@@shannonjurgens3667that seems a bit much, afaik the moving parts of a jet engine are usually just the turbines which total up to two or three spools; I guess the compressor/turbine blisks count up to 10-15 or so if you count them unless you're referring to all the fuel/oil valves. Technically speaking, engines like ramjets and scramjets have no moving parts at all

    • @ar-visions
      @ar-visions 11 месяцев назад +1

      if a part A is attached to a rotating part does that make part A moving?

    • @johno9507
      @johno9507 10 месяцев назад +1

      What about the fuel control unit, pneumatic starter, hydraulic pumps, oil scavange pumps, pressure pumps, pressure reducing shut off valves, check valves, thrust reversers, dynamic seals, Intergrated drive generators, dedicated alternator, fan air valve, gear box...how many moving parts do they have...and yes I fix jet engines.

  • @RyanPlate
    @RyanPlate Год назад +1

    5:11 Did they really just say "...the organization's smegma pulse..."??

    • @danwarnick1283
      @danwarnick1283 Год назад +1

      "Snecma Pulse". Snecma of France (Villaroche) was the original 50/50 partner with GE for the CFM56 series engines. Snecma is now Safran and they remain strong partners for the CFM56 (50/50 is pretty strong, right?) and lesser partner for a number of other engine collaborations. Safran, is their name now and they also produce other, standalone, engines themselves.

  • @user-cd9wj1hg6b
    @user-cd9wj1hg6b 4 месяца назад +1

    與日本新型引擎相比,直徑超過2m,新引擎裝在1m內,推力11噸,4倍直徑,推力14噸,4倍直徑,平方直徑是4倍,日本新開發的引擎推力11噸,直徑1米,重量2噸左右,雙發22噸總重4噸左右,有70%的推力國外發動機70%的14噸推力有10噸左右,22噸vs國外70%發動機15.4噸,日本產4噸左右,((日本發動機輕了11.4噸)滿載11.4多噸的武器、彈藥、飛彈、燃料等。戰鬥機的耐用性是由其續航時間決定的。戰鬥機之所以能像日本一樣使用15年到30年甚至更長,日本擁有精確製造的技術超小型精密零件和超大型零件。

  • @user-rt1jk3mj9d
    @user-rt1jk3mj9d Год назад

    F35のエンジンは一個、それが故障すると終わり、やはりエンジンは2個いります😂

  • @Sathyanarayana143IshwarB-mh8zr
    @Sathyanarayana143IshwarB-mh8zr 7 месяцев назад

    Al Fida Jummah Jummah Mubarak To Entire Globe 🌍 All Nation's Proud Pride Electric ⚡ Aircraft Manufacture Industrial Engineering Factories We Are Remembering Your Soul's Service And Sacrifices Love And High Respect From Al Lal ❤❤

  • @user-ik1rr5lx2e
    @user-ik1rr5lx2e 3 месяца назад

    A temperatura do leizer quebra as moleculas e as matérias que tão jumto com as moleculas na fremte quebra as partícula evitá que as turbina aquece e eliminado os gazes quebrando as matérias e os atumo não tem limite de rotação a velocidade acima da velocidade da luz bilhão de vezes

  • @krimouAAA
    @krimouAAA Год назад

    Why researchs are not focussed on developing new fuels?

  • @airgaborpara3824
    @airgaborpara3824 Год назад +6

    Nonstop military spending but the budget deficit is over 35 trillion dollar. Moneyprinting is mad in USA. Destroys the whole market soon. 2008 was a light crash

  • @user-lj2xz4gh7l
    @user-lj2xz4gh7l 4 месяца назад

    جيد جدا لكن روسيا العضمى افل بهاذ المجال

  • @ronaldkiplagat6034
    @ronaldkiplagat6034 Год назад +1

    Do they test every engine they manufacture?

    • @oscarkanstrup5914
      @oscarkanstrup5914 Год назад +1

      I think for the price of the engines and the small amount used and manufactured they probably run tests on every engine also considering a mistake could be a one time mistake since it is made by humans and also considering the chance of the engines failing mid flight is to dangerous so if the manufacturer doesn’t test it the buyer definitely will

    • @danwarnick1283
      @danwarnick1283 Год назад

      "Acceptance Test" is considered a part of production and is SOP in most cases. They do this of course to ensure any post-assembly issues are caught and remedied before delivery to any customer. Acceptance Test also establishes a baseline for an engine that can be used to project out maintenance planning into the future. There's a lot more to it than just that, but that is the gist of it.

    • @rael5469
      @rael5469 Год назад +1

      "Do they test every engine they manufacture?"
      Yes !

  • @BigEightiesNewWave
    @BigEightiesNewWave 6 месяцев назад

    I wonder how many just stop oil protesters drove to their destinations or flew on a plane.😂

  • @Liujun-mt6qu
    @Liujun-mt6qu Год назад

    我擦!!这么粗?和客机的差不多了!这还是战斗机的发动机吗?难怪开加力才一点多的马赫数!!

  • @breath7819
    @breath7819 Год назад

    Give this technology to my nation pls pls

  • @sherwinsalvatori6997
    @sherwinsalvatori6997 6 месяцев назад

    Jet/gas turbines engines has fewer moving parts compared to reciprocating piston engine

  • @BigEightiesNewWave
    @BigEightiesNewWave 6 месяцев назад

    RR had the oil stub-pipe problem and PW had the exploding combustor cans problem. I prefer GE.
    YES, I watch a LOT of airplane disaster videos. Planes are only as safe as the worst mechanic to work on it, and as dangerous as the airline that cuts corners, and refuses to grease parts like the jack-screws.

  • @davidwhiteley3879
    @davidwhiteley3879 10 месяцев назад

    There are many kinds of air breathing engines - this is not unique to jet engines. Also, factories primary function is to make and assemble. The things they design are not engines but are items associated with making and assembling the engines.

  • @dacostasikka1212
    @dacostasikka1212 10 месяцев назад

    Menakjubkan

  • @kongropan5847
    @kongropan5847 Год назад

    Mantap

  • @aramsadon4654
    @aramsadon4654 10 месяцев назад

    Thanks. ..

  • @yusufwiltoys518
    @yusufwiltoys518 11 месяцев назад

    Amazing

  • @wongcilik5960
    @wongcilik5960 Год назад

    America is indeed very great, inventing and producing the Boeing 737 and F35 aircraft, where, these two types of aircraft, are able to fly and dive in the sea, super technology.....hahahahahahaha....❤☝👍💪👋👋👋👋👋

  • @htprimeaux8570
    @htprimeaux8570 10 месяцев назад

    300,000 hours between overall can’t possibly be correct. Maybe 30,000 hours?

  • @boss42971
    @boss42971 10 месяцев назад +2

    Electric Aircraft powered by a grid that overwhelmingly uses fossil fuels. Because that's efficient.

  • @mike.47
    @mike.47 Год назад +4

    Not sure how the F35 jet engine can be called futuristic when it’s in production and has been for quite some time.

    • @user-ih1pm6hm1y
      @user-ih1pm6hm1y Год назад +3

      Cuz "futuristic" to all countries except USA.

    • @TheMrgoodmanners
      @TheMrgoodmanners Год назад +1

      I just dont get what all the hooplas abt with this plane. its especially coming from Americans. They have some other magnificent aircraft compared to this

    • @lisaroberts8556
      @lisaroberts8556 Год назад +2

      The Engine System for the F-35 has been updated several times. What it is today has changed dramatically from it’s conception in the 90’s

    • @StewartWalker-hy1eo
      @StewartWalker-hy1eo Год назад +1

      Especially when the UK played a major roll in the development of this engine

    • @xuanoantong3771
      @xuanoantong3771 11 месяцев назад

      Mỹ giỏi thế mà vẫn thua Việt Nam? Bị Việt Nam đánh cho tan tác buộc phải cút về nước. Mình thấy Mỹ mới chính là kẻ hay gây hấn, hay đi đánh các nước yếu.

  • @Deku69420
    @Deku69420 10 месяцев назад

    Jet engines great video!

  • @tarunchandra8891
    @tarunchandra8891 10 месяцев назад

    Impressive

  • @user-qk4ey3qt8q
    @user-qk4ey3qt8q Год назад

    금문이니라 6:07

  • @Istandby666
    @Istandby666 11 месяцев назад

    The 35 version with ATOL, is from the technology from the Russians.