Just wanted to personally thank you for taking the time to put these video together. This course was very stressful and I listened to all of your videos that were straight to the point and very informative! I scored 86% in the course and was so happy! Thanks again, I really appreciate it!
I've been taught it was only since Wundt that the workings of the psyche came to be examined more deeply. Recently, this has been puzzling me greatly, because it is human nature to try and understand what drives ourselves and others. And indeed, even the ancient Greeks were thinking about it; Socrates was greatly inspired by the Delphi maxim "know thyself". People had been pondering the nature of the mind since time immemorial! So why, amongst all other great scientific, technological, and cultural progress, were they seemingly spinning their wheels when it comes to the mind? What is required for humanity to get to the circumstance someone like Wundt may emerge? This is the question your lecture series makes much easier to answer, as it presents the puzzle pieces of history so comprehendibly. Your efforts are greatly appreciated!
Secondary qualities is because I taste the apple, its a perception. And If I see the apple, it is not a perception? I see its shape, also I can touch its shape. I am using my senses.
His belief in innate ideas makes him a rationalist, so we agree on that Roland. Schultz & Schultz choose to say that his focus on observation and experimentation make him an empiricist, and it's their book that I'm teaching, so that's why it's in the video lectures.
@@hatalatesting6476 in reality he was a rationalist because of his focus on reality. He thought that the intellect was to be used to find those truths that are clear and distinct, all this by the observation of reality and the use of his method.
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
Just wanted to personally thank you for taking the time to put these video together. This course was very stressful and I listened to all of your videos that were straight to the point and very informative! I scored 86% in the course and was so happy! Thanks again, I really appreciate it!
Thanks a lot Professor for making such a precise summary of the chapters.. It is really helpful..
I've been taught it was only since Wundt that the workings of the psyche came to be examined more deeply. Recently, this has been puzzling me greatly, because it is human nature to try and understand what drives ourselves and others. And indeed, even the ancient Greeks were thinking about it; Socrates was greatly inspired by the Delphi maxim "know thyself". People had been pondering the nature of the mind since time immemorial! So why, amongst all other great scientific, technological, and cultural progress, were they seemingly spinning their wheels when it comes to the mind?
What is required for humanity to get to the circumstance someone like Wundt may emerge? This is the question your lecture series makes much easier to answer, as it presents the puzzle pieces of history so comprehendibly. Your efforts are greatly appreciated!
I just want to say thank you for your videos!! My professor has not posted any lectures over the chapters and it makes this class difficult.
You're very welcome, and thanks for taking the time to comment!
Where I can get this slide, sir ?
Secondary qualities is because I taste the apple, its a perception. And If I see the apple, it is not a perception? I see its shape, also I can touch its shape. I am using my senses.
If I dont perceive the object, how can I know it exists? And sight is a perception. So, everything is subjective.
I dont know how to say thank you that it would be enough
You are VERY welcome, and thank you for your kind words!
10:35
Why does philosophy always sound to me like the rantings of crazy people at the bus stop?
thank u ure so funny
Thanks! So many bad jokes, but I'm doing my best.
The Difference Engine could not play Chess lol
Descartes was a rationalist, wtf. Not an empiricist.
His belief in innate ideas makes him a rationalist, so we agree on that Roland. Schultz & Schultz choose to say that his focus on observation and experimentation make him an empiricist, and it's their book that I'm teaching, so that's why it's in the video lectures.
@@hatalatesting6476 in reality he was a rationalist because of his focus on reality. He thought that the intellect was to be used to find those truths that are clear and distinct, all this by the observation of reality and the use of his method.