i'd still take this with a pinch of salt as Samyang might have cherry picked this lens out of the bunch because of its " fantastic optical performance " I'm ordering mine at the end of the month and will be putting it up with a Sony A1 and A7R4A il see how it perfomes on larger megapixel sensors
@@ItsEzlan I love the optic ofthe lens, but with ofc time to time… make my camera a bit “loquita”, I must remove the batterie to bring-it back to life .
I have it for a week now and totally enjoy it. Razor sharp at 1.8, lightweight, fast auto focus, and incredible images: it's ability to isolate the subject even at long distance is quite remarkable. I also like bokeh, not clinically smooth, but somewhat warm vintage analog. And considering it cost twice as less as sony, it's a no brainer.
I purchased this lens based on the stellar reviews... it was my primary lens on safari in Africa. Excellent performance. It worked even better in low light conditions... razor sharp in a smoky hut with the door half closed and no artificial light.
Samyang made incredible lenses since the 50 1.4 AF and XP series. They only had to invest on good autofocus. Honestly right now I can work with a full samyang setup on Sony, except for the 200-600
I bought an EF mount manual Samyang 135mm lens a few years ago after a great review from Christopher. I have 25 lenses and out of all of them it is the only 100% perfect optical quality lens. Absolutely perfect image. Head and shoulders above all the others!
Only thing I didn’t like about this review is that I have a 135 GM in my kit bag and was hoping for some affirmation that it was worth it. We’ll done Samyang.
I have seen another review of this lens and they did test both the samyang and Sony GM versions on a moving subject and while they were both insanely sharp! The Sony GM did get 18 out of 20 photos in focus while the samyang got 16 out of 20 when shooting burst on moving subject... So yeah the GM is still better... But is it worth 2x what the samyang cost? From my point of view I would say yes, if photography is your profession. If you are like me... A hobbyist photographer that sometimes shoot weddings for friends and family then it is more worth getting the samyang.. However, when I did notice Samyang was going to release their 135mm AF lens I was already saving for that Sony 135 GM 😇
If you're using the A9 or A1 bodies the focusing system on the Samyang can't attain 20 & 30 FPS. On the slower bodies with 10 FPS there is no real advantage.
First Viltrox with the 13mm APSC-lens and now Samyang with this 135mm lens are showing what incredible performance they can achieve when they aren't restricting themselves by trying to keep the lens in the super-budget territory.
Still a very good price here though. I like the budget lenses from these brands, but it's become very interesting to see what they do in the 'Better priced than rivals' catagories.
This is an amazing lens. I also own the manual focus 135mm F2 lens. Also super sharp but a beast to use outside of studio conditions and very heavy. This new lens has become my favorite portrait lens.
This review helped convince me to jump on an open-box version (all the new ones were sold out everywhere I looked) and I have to say it lives up to the hype. Absolutely love it. Thanks for the video
I'm a long time lurker on your channel, but thought I'd just say... Wow. Corner sharpness at 1.8 was just unexpected. I thought we might see some softness, but nope!!! Thanks for the review as always. Am tempted to get this myself.
This is "the" review I have been expecting for a long time. A lot of online reviews showed portraits, but they were not strict enough to draw a conclusion to its optical performance. By comparing to your previous review on 135GM, I have decided to purchase Samyang 135 when I see a discount (hopefully in June, end of financial year sales as I am in Australia).
@@OkwyUgonweze Bought now when I found a discount. Top optical quality with nothing I could criticize. The focusing speed isn't top speed like 135GM, but since I don't use it for birding, its focusing is just good enough for human portraits or landscape.
@@OkwyUgonweze It actually appeared better than Chris's tests in chromatic aberration, because I used night stars as an infinity target than a close up target for chromatic aberration. The total CA was about 2 pixels on A7Riv, i.e. about 6µm. It's also very sharp too with a couple pixels of coma maximum. Optically, it's among the top quality of all full frame lenses, definitely on par with 135GM.
So far I am more then happy with the lens. One thing not mentioned in the review there is issue with power drain even when the camera is off. You need docking station to be able to install new firmware to fix it. Otherwise for the money it's really great lens.
That's a remarkably good performance for this lens! Christopher, next time you're talking to Samyang, please suggest to them that they make a version for the Canon RF mount. Cheers. Great video as usual, by the way. :-)
I had the EF version of this lens when it came out and it rendered some of the most dreamy portraits I've ever shot. It was hard to use with the 5D Mark 3 but it would be easy with my R5.
Thank you, Christopher, for your marvellous reviews which are always a pleasure to watch and - language-wise - to listen to! Your praising of this lens means that it must indeed be 100%plus! I wonder how you would rate it against the Zeiss Batis 135mm 2.8 which I own, but hardly use. Cheers Samuel
I’m actually very surprised that Samyang kept this lens very quiet. As Sonys 135 is one of there absolute best performing lens right next to the 400 2.8. I use to have the Sigma 135 but it was so heavy and a burden to carry on wedding days and long shoots. This lens will be a perfect replacement and I have really missed this focal length. I’m hoping that the low light auto focus is still decent in continuous auto focus as well but this should be a very exciting lens for all Sony users
Can't wait for the Fuji version. The manual Samyang 135mm has been my main concert workhorse for years across Nikon and Fuji systems, and the AF version looks pretty much just as good but like with the AF version of the 12mm F2 they seem to have gotten rid of the magenta cast.
This is a full frame lens. It may get a Z mount version (very unlikely since Nikon doesn't seem willing to open its AF protocol), but won't be on Fuji X mount.
@@serena-yu Dude, the manual Samyang 135mm F2 is a full frame lens too. Samyang has already ported tons of full frame lenses to Fuji, the 85mm, 50mm, the 14mm, the 135 and the list goes on. Viltrox does it too with their 85.
I bought my copy of this lens on release and I regret NOTHING! however I did notice one downside with the lens...when in firmware v1.0 it will drain battery power from the camera it is mounted on even when the camera is powered off! This was solved with firmware update to v2.0... It can also be solved by removing the battery from the camera when not in use or removing the lens from the camera body. To update your Samyang AF lenses firmware.. You will need a lens station from samyang, it's fairly low cost and I did get one sent to me at no extra cost when I preordered this lens. If you already have a lens station you will need to uninstall the lens manager software if you have an old version of the software and reinstall the newest version (can be found on samyangs homepage).... I also noticed one more thing that is really not a big deal for me... But did anyone else that has this lens notice it is difficult to fit it in the lens bag that comes with it? 😅 of course I have a lens bag so I'm not really bothered by this but still found it a bit funny to see samyang send a standard sized bad for a big lens like this one 😂 anyway... I would like to nominate this lens for lens of the year (when it comes to bang for buck among Prime lenses)... It's my Best Buy so far this year 👍👍👍👍
The pitch you made for people to go out and buy this lens was one of the most funny ones I've heard in a long time, cheers mate! I'm on a Canon EOS R, I'll likely be getting the Sigma as I have a set of Sigma lenses already.
At $1000, samyang probably didn't need to pack science-fiction grade optics into this lens for it to sell like hotcakes, but they did it anyways. Great review as always!
Sorry to disappoint you but ''science-fiction grade optics'' are not really what Samyang/Sigma/Tamron/Laowa and others really specialize in... That you can leave to Voigtlander, Zeiss, Hasselblad, PhaseOne and Leica. The most you will get out of these cheaper lenses is either faster aperture or sharpness. Best case scenario you get both fast aperture and sharpness, which with this Samyang lens you do get both! As for image quality, you won't see Hasselblad, Zeiss or Voigtlander level of glass engineering in a $1,000 135mm lens, that's physically and financially impossible to achieve, even if Samyang was a non-profit org/company. Sony GM lenses are built based on Zeiss engineering standards which Sony adopted from Zeiss during their Sony-Zeiss partnership contract that lasted from 2009 to 2019, so for the E-mount, if you care about image quality, your best (and only) options are to save up money for either the 135mm GM or 135mm Batis.
I have the old manual focus Rokinon 135mm F2 and that lens has amazing colors and background obliterating bokeh. A lot of folks (myself included) use it for astro photography (where lack of AF isn't such a big deal). I wonder how this news lens compares (for example, does it use the same optical formula and coatings).
How do you mount it on a tripod ? Do you use a tripod collar ? I shoot with an A6400 and got the manual 135mm f2 recently. Love it for handheld stills.. Still looking for mounting options.
Excellent review of what appears to be a super 135mm lens thank you Christopher but for those of us who already own the outstanding non-AF, f2 version the fact that the only fly in the ointment appears to be slightly iffy AF then it's a not so attractive upgrade for the additional expense.
I guess it depends on what you are shooting. If your subject is stationary and not moving the MF lens might be fine for you. In my case… I shoot to many moving objects and at f2 the dof is pretty thin, which means I will miss out on too many images. And as most shoots I do are limited in time, I can’t be fiddling with the focus all day long, so definitely AF for me.
@@catchlite5196 In that case then the DOF will be even thinner at F1.8 and as the AF is apparently a weak point of this newer lens it might be disappointing.
@@oingyboingybob nope, it does an awesome job. For me at least. Maybe with fast moving subjects coming at you while shooting… I haven’t done any shooting like that yet and doesn’t happen often in my case.
I did not expect that I would be amassing a Samyang/Rokinon collection, but here we are. This lens is absolutely next on my list unless sigma releases a 70-200 before I get to buy this.
1st world problems aside, this is getting obnoxious for me as a canon user. The 800mm and the good enough read out time on the R6 is all that’s keeping me in the system
Canon is great of you wanna be on a budget and adapt old lenses on the RF body. But if you want legit modern good stuff, Sony and it's first and third party ecosystem is where it's at.
Your enthusiasm for this particular lens among the many you've tested is quite remarkable. Can you recommend a full-frame wide-angle lens with similar acclaim?
Wonderful review as usual One thing I'm always curious about, is why people care so much about corner sharpness at open apertures of portrait lenses (other than from a purely technical standpoint). Surely the corners will always be blurry anyway in the photos taken?
When doing portrait photography, yes. But your subject won't always be dead centre in the frame, and also, portrait photography is not all these lenses are used for
I wish they've made this lens back in 2018, and I would've rushed out to buy it. The Sony 135mm f/1.8 GM brand new is twice as expensive, but nowadays, you could get one for roughly US$1200~1300 used. The AF speed seems to be very different.
I have used the f/2 version. This 135mm f1.8 is more apochromatic than the f2 ED, from the looks Christopher has shown, also from the photo of tree branches against a bright sky shown by Sony alpha blog.
Impressive performance! Would love it, if Samyang get some of their AF lenses out for Nikon and Canon mirrorless. Would be interesting to see, how well the AF would perform on my Z9. Another brilliant review Chris, thank you very much
I just came across your video and you have persuaded me to purchase the lens. And boy oh boy, what an absolute BEAST! Thank you so much. I honestly was about to sell my kidney to buy the Sony version, but thankfully your video saved me from doing that lol.
Oh good! I just broke out yesterday... I guess I’ll have to get this! 😂 Thank you for consistently putting out great concise reviews, without the glorification and overall Overly opinionated BS like other channels. Keep up the great work, you rock!
If only I had the money for this lens. Or a Sony. Or a FF camera XD I'm gonna keep my fingers crossed we start to see some AF lenses for Fuji from Samyang soon. I would love their 35mm f1.2 and 85mm for mirrorless camera's in an AF body on Fuji :D
Thank you for review! A reminder though for potential buyers, if your Sony body is as old as my a7m2, the AF could work WORSE! I once had a lot AF issues with a Samyang 35mm f1.4 AF, which turned out to work great on another a7m3..
I am wondering if the corner sharpness test is meaningless. The front element is curved so optically wouldn't the corners be focusing a bit closer than the center? So say if you had a curved dish that just exactly matches the focus on every point, then it'd be tack sharp all throughout?
@@dudeiusmannigast1543 i know but it would still be fun to see how well it age and comare to the new ones ( and we didnt see it on the new standard sharpness test picture and disturtion one ) i also prefer mf as well ( my fav glass is a old topcon lens becuase of the old school look it gives to the photo's )
Another excellent example of the E-Mount's biggest strength; Its vast 3rd party lens support. More quality glass at more price points for enthusiasts and great 1st party lenses to save up for/aspire to own.
I take mainly wider angle and landscape shots. May have missed releases, but am not aware of Samyang, Rokkinon, Sigma wide angle zooms. Are they simply too expensive to produce for what may be regarded as a relatively small market, or have I just missed the release publicity and reviews- which I doubt.
Hi Chris, I tested the lens (two copies!) against my trusty old Canon EF 135MM F2 from 1996. Landscape, distance 1km, both lenses fully open. Guess what, the Canon won hands down in resolution. By far, really far at borders and corners, and by a small margin in the center/midfield area. Both lenses with no symetry problems.I would really like to send you the comparison image.... Samyang Germany emailed me today "this is a lens for portraits...sorry for any....." I cannot believe it ..
I find the Rokinon version on Amazon in Canada. Will this be the same lens? It is several hundred dollars cheaper than the Samyang coming from the U.S.
A glowing review :) pictures certainly were sharp. Great for low light on a Sony A7IV They also make an f2.0 which is much cheaper. Maybe that's great too? (I see you have reviewed that too)
I will be picking one of these up soon, been waiting for a review of it. I wouldn’t mind seeing the 100mm stf lens tested, I own it and think it’s phenomenal, would be interesting to see you test that one.
I have the 135 f2 previous manual version of the lens . how about PQ between them at the same f stops ? Is it worth stepping to the 1.8 ? Generally ia m extremely pleased with the F2 but an upgrade if the final result makes is worth it would be very good news
70 / 5.000 Kết quả dịch After I finished watching this video, I immediately bought one for myself. I've always been interested in your videos since my Canon days !!! I am also waiting to see your review of the two new models of Samyang's lenses, the 35 f1.4 II and the 50 f1.4 II. Also waiting for you to compare the Tamron 28-75 G2 against the older one. waiting for it, wish you always happy
samyang seems to be the only one doing RF lenses with AF at this time... i dont know whats different for them but i do hope sigma and tamron will also offer RF lenses soon. Every time i see new lenses for other ML systems i get a slight dose of envy ... :D
my jaw actually dropped when you panned over to those image corners at f1.8 - incredible performance for a lens half the price of the GM!
Mine didn't! Samyang shows pretty steadily and solidly an amazing optical performance of their lenses.
i'd still take this with a pinch of salt as Samyang might have cherry picked this lens out of the bunch because of its " fantastic optical performance "
I'm ordering mine at the end of the month and will be putting it up with a Sony A1 and A7R4A il see how it perfomes on larger megapixel sensors
@@ItsEzlan Please try also with off camera flash, or at least with a flash. No model needed, just to..."nothing".
@@charruaporelmundo oh don't worry I shoot alot of portraits and headshots in a studio environment
@@ItsEzlan I love the optic ofthe lens, but with ofc time to time… make my camera a bit “loquita”, I must remove the batterie to bring-it back to life .
Christopher Frost is the only lens reviewer that encourage people to break out of jail.
Love the conclusion, Chris (break out of jail!) Looking forward to getting my hands on one and doing a head to head with 135GM.
Hey Dustin and Chris it would be great if you also compare with the old 135f2 and see how much has changed
Dustin, I can't wait for you to do a comparison and a in depth review. You always cover every base.
Wow...both of my favorite reviewers at one place. Eagerly waiting for your review Dustin
The low vignetting and fine corner performance is invaluable for night sky imaging.
I have it for a week now and totally enjoy it. Razor sharp at 1.8, lightweight, fast auto focus, and incredible images: it's ability to isolate the subject even at long distance is quite remarkable. I also like bokeh, not clinically smooth, but somewhat warm vintage analog. And considering it cost twice as less as sony, it's a no brainer.
And again Samyang proves itself! Thank you wholeheartedly for making world-class lenses that are affordable by most rising photographers!
I just wanted you to thank you for your stellar reviews Chris! Highest quality paired with consistency and just a pleasure to watch every time. :)
I've watched almost all your lens reviews and man this lens is good...even from its widest aparture, corner to corner, this lens is sharp af..
I purchased this lens based on the stellar reviews... it was my primary lens on safari in Africa. Excellent performance. It worked even better in low light conditions... razor sharp in a smoky hut with the door half closed and no artificial light.
Samyang made incredible lenses since the 50 1.4 AF and XP series. They only had to invest on good autofocus. Honestly right now I can work with a full samyang setup on Sony, except for the 200-600
I bought an EF mount manual Samyang 135mm lens a few years ago after a great review from Christopher. I have 25 lenses and out of all of them it is the only 100% perfect optical quality lens. Absolutely perfect image. Head and shoulders above all the others!
Note that firmware V1 of this lens would drain the battery even when the camera is switched off. V2 fixes this.
Only thing I didn’t like about this review is that I have a 135 GM in my kit bag and was hoping for some affirmation that it was worth it. We’ll done Samyang.
I have seen another review of this lens and they did test both the samyang and Sony GM versions on a moving subject and while they were both insanely sharp! The Sony GM did get 18 out of 20 photos in focus while the samyang got 16 out of 20 when shooting burst on moving subject... So yeah the GM is still better... But is it worth 2x what the samyang cost? From my point of view I would say yes, if photography is your profession. If you are like me... A hobbyist photographer that sometimes shoot weddings for friends and family then it is more worth getting the samyang.. However, when I did notice Samyang was going to release their 135mm AF lens I was already saving for that Sony 135 GM 😇
If you're using the A9 or A1 bodies the focusing system on the Samyang can't attain 20 & 30 FPS. On the slower bodies with 10 FPS there is no real advantage.
The GM is the faster and more accurate focusing lens. Also, I do think that the GM can better resist bumping the lens into something by accident..
The fps limit is arbitrarily imposed by Sony and has nothing to do with 3rd party lens makers.
First Viltrox with the 13mm APSC-lens and now Samyang with this 135mm lens are showing what incredible performance they can achieve when they aren't restricting themselves by trying to keep the lens in the super-budget territory.
And you might argue this is budget territory still compared to the competition.
Still a very good price here though. I like the budget lenses from these brands, but it's become very interesting to see what they do in the 'Better priced than rivals' catagories.
@@deanjamescarroll I really enjoyed the samyang 24mm 1.8 until I sold it. It was razor sharp wide open, it was just the CA that was bothering me.
Damn. What a stellar lens! Amazing work Chris (as always!)
Insane that I was able to pick this lens up for 650$ on Black Friday. INSANE optics on this one.
This is an amazing lens. I also own the manual focus 135mm F2 lens. Also super sharp but a beast to use outside of studio conditions and very heavy. This new lens has become my favorite portrait lens.
This review helped convince me to jump on an open-box version (all the new ones were sold out everywhere I looked) and I have to say it lives up to the hype. Absolutely love it. Thanks for the video
There is no one who makes quality review videos like you. You are unbeatable in this regard.
I'm a long time lurker on your channel, but thought I'd just say... Wow. Corner sharpness at 1.8 was just unexpected. I thought we might see some softness, but nope!!! Thanks for the review as always. Am tempted to get this myself.
This is "the" review I have been expecting for a long time. A lot of online reviews showed portraits, but they were not strict enough to draw a conclusion to its optical performance. By comparing to your previous review on 135GM, I have decided to purchase Samyang 135 when I see a discount (hopefully in June, end of financial year sales as I am in Australia).
What's your experience?
Am looking to get a 135 for the e mount.
@@OkwyUgonweze Bought now when I found a discount. Top optical quality with nothing I could criticize. The focusing speed isn't top speed like 135GM, but since I don't use it for birding, its focusing is just good enough for human portraits or landscape.
@@serena-yu thanks .
@@OkwyUgonweze It actually appeared better than Chris's tests in chromatic aberration, because I used night stars as an infinity target than a close up target for chromatic aberration. The total CA was about 2 pixels on A7Riv, i.e. about 6µm. It's also very sharp too with a couple pixels of coma maximum. Optically, it's among the top quality of all full frame lenses, definitely on par with 135GM.
Great review Chris, this lens performs much better than expected. Thank you for posting this review in such a timely manor.
I bought this lens instantly when i saw the test results! Incredible value for money, very pleased with my purchase, excellent video.
It’s so sharpe, the corner performance is fantastic, I’m impressed
A pleasant surprise at the end of the video! Thoroughly enjoyed this review of Samyang AF 135mm!
I've had strong G.A.S. for this lens since you posted this video. I've finally found one used for super cheap and ordered it. Thanks Christopher!
So far I am more then happy with the lens. One thing not mentioned in the review there is issue with power drain even when the camera is off. You need docking station to be able to install new firmware to fix it. Otherwise for the money it's really great lens.
That's a remarkably good performance for this lens! Christopher, next time you're talking to Samyang, please suggest to them that they make a version for the Canon RF mount. Cheers. Great video as usual, by the way. :-)
I had the EF version of this lens when it came out and it rendered some of the most dreamy portraits I've ever shot. It was hard to use with the 5D Mark 3 but it would be easy with my R5.
Thank you, Christopher, for your marvellous reviews which are always a pleasure to watch and - language-wise - to listen to! Your praising of this lens means that it must indeed be 100%plus! I wonder how you would rate it against the Zeiss Batis 135mm 2.8 which I own, but hardly use. Cheers
Samuel
I’m actually very surprised that Samyang kept this lens very quiet. As Sonys 135 is one of there absolute best performing lens right next to the 400 2.8. I use to have the Sigma 135 but it was so heavy and a burden to carry on wedding days and long shoots. This lens will be a perfect replacement and I have really missed this focal length. I’m hoping that the low light auto focus is still decent in continuous auto focus as well but this should be a very exciting lens for all Sony users
Can't wait for the Fuji version. The manual Samyang 135mm has been my main concert workhorse for years across Nikon and Fuji systems, and the AF version looks pretty much just as good but like with the AF version of the 12mm F2 they seem to have gotten rid of the magenta cast.
Also having dust/weather seals on the AF lenses does not hurt either 😇
This is a full frame lens. It may get a Z mount version (very unlikely since Nikon doesn't seem willing to open its AF protocol), but won't be on Fuji X mount.
@@serena-yu Dude, the manual Samyang 135mm F2 is a full frame lens too. Samyang has already ported tons of full frame lenses to Fuji, the 85mm, 50mm, the 14mm, the 135 and the list goes on. Viltrox does it too with their 85.
@@Vinterloft wow, I have never heard about that. It sounds nice though
Hi Christopher. Any news for a Canon version?
You made me fall in love with This lens 😍❤️
Amazing! Thank you for this review. I cannot wait to see it's Astrophotography performance.
I own a Zeiss 135mm f/1.8 (a mount) and wishing someone can do a comparison with these newer lenses on a la-ea5 equipped sony mirrorless!!
Your reviews are the best on the internet. Thanks, sincerely.
I bought my copy of this lens on release and I regret NOTHING! however I did notice one downside with the lens...when in firmware v1.0 it will drain battery power from the camera it is mounted on even when the camera is powered off! This was solved with firmware update to v2.0... It can also be solved by removing the battery from the camera when not in use or removing the lens from the camera body. To update your Samyang AF lenses firmware.. You will need a lens station from samyang, it's fairly low cost and I did get one sent to me at no extra cost when I preordered this lens. If you already have a lens station you will need to uninstall the lens manager software if you have an old version of the software and reinstall the newest version (can be found on samyangs homepage).... I also noticed one more thing that is really not a big deal for me... But did anyone else that has this lens notice it is difficult to fit it in the lens bag that comes with it? 😅 of course I have a lens bag so I'm not really bothered by this but still found it a bit funny to see samyang send a standard sized bad for a big lens like this one 😂 anyway... I would like to nominate this lens for lens of the year (when it comes to bang for buck among Prime lenses)... It's my Best Buy so far this year 👍👍👍👍
hi whats ur current feedback of this lens? hows it af? and sharpness of human portraits at 1.8. TIA
I got the Samyang 135mm f1.8 recently and I am absolutely in love with it :)
The pitch you made for people to go out and buy this lens was one of the most funny ones I've heard in a long time, cheers mate! I'm on a Canon EOS R, I'll likely be getting the Sigma as I have a set of Sigma lenses already.
please do a comparison to sigma art 135 f 1.8 also compare to nikon plena 135 f 1.8
At $1000, samyang probably didn't need to pack science-fiction grade optics into this lens for it to sell like hotcakes, but they did it anyways. Great review as always!
Sorry to disappoint you but ''science-fiction grade optics'' are not really what Samyang/Sigma/Tamron/Laowa and others really specialize in... That you can leave to Voigtlander, Zeiss, Hasselblad, PhaseOne and Leica. The most you will get out of these cheaper lenses is either faster aperture or sharpness. Best case scenario you get both fast aperture and sharpness, which with this Samyang lens you do get both! As for image quality, you won't see Hasselblad, Zeiss or Voigtlander level of glass engineering in a $1,000 135mm lens, that's physically and financially impossible to achieve, even if Samyang was a non-profit org/company. Sony GM lenses are built based on Zeiss engineering standards which Sony adopted from Zeiss during their Sony-Zeiss partnership contract that lasted from 2009 to 2019, so for the E-mount, if you care about image quality, your best (and only) options are to save up money for either the 135mm GM or 135mm Batis.
@@nogerboher5266 bro just take photos 😭
@@travishartnett2307 Don't have to tell me twice 😁 I life off it🤪
@@nogerboher5266Did you even watch this video and listen to its conclusions?
I have the old manual focus Rokinon 135mm F2 and that lens has amazing colors and background obliterating bokeh. A lot of folks (myself included) use it for astro photography (where lack of AF isn't such a big deal). I wonder how this news lens compares (for example, does it use the same optical formula and coatings).
How do you mount it on a tripod ? Do you use a tripod collar ? I shoot with an A6400 and got the manual 135mm f2 recently. Love it for handheld stills.. Still looking for mounting options.
Awesome! Wish they would make it for the rf mount
Excellent review of what appears to be a super 135mm lens thank you Christopher but for those of us who already own the outstanding non-AF, f2 version the fact that the only fly in the ointment appears to be slightly iffy AF then it's a not so attractive upgrade for the additional expense.
I guess it depends on what you are shooting. If your subject is stationary and not moving the MF lens might be fine for you. In my case… I shoot to many moving objects and at f2 the dof is pretty thin, which means I will miss out on too many images. And as most shoots I do are limited in time, I can’t be fiddling with the focus all day long, so definitely AF for me.
@@catchlite5196
In that case then the DOF will be even thinner at F1.8 and as the AF is apparently a weak point of this newer lens it might be disappointing.
@@oingyboingybob nope, it does an awesome job. For me at least. Maybe with fast moving subjects coming at you while shooting… I haven’t done any shooting like that yet and doesn’t happen often in my case.
I did not expect that I would be amassing a Samyang/Rokinon collection, but here we are. This lens is absolutely next on my list unless sigma releases a 70-200 before I get to buy this.
That focus breathing is just… wow!
Every time Sony gets an awesome 3rd party lens, I die a little inside clutching my canon mirrorless gear :(
1st world problems aside, this is getting obnoxious for me as a canon user. The 800mm and the good enough read out time on the R6 is all that’s keeping me in the system
canon has awesome ef gear that is cheap. i personally shot canon DSLRs before but am now deep into sony fe.
Same here smh.
@@richrollin4867 Yeah it sucks...I have Samyangs RF 85 1.4
Canon is great of you wanna be on a budget and adapt old lenses on the RF body. But if you want legit modern good stuff, Sony and it's first and third party ecosystem is where it's at.
Waiting for your review of Samyang 50 mm f1.4 II!
Thanks for another excellently useful review, Chris! If this ever comes out in Z mount, I'm getting a Z camera and one of these instantly!
What a time to be alive. So many great lenses coming out.
Your enthusiasm for this particular lens among the many you've tested is quite remarkable. Can you recommend a full-frame wide-angle lens with similar acclaim?
Wow I was waiting for you to test this lens for a long time
What version of the firmware did you have on it during the review.?
Been waiting for this one!
Wonderful review as usual One thing I'm always curious about, is why people care so much about corner sharpness at open apertures of portrait lenses (other than from a purely technical standpoint). Surely the corners will always be blurry anyway in the photos taken?
When doing portrait photography, yes. But your subject won't always be dead centre in the frame, and also, portrait photography is not all these lenses are used for
Wow. Better even than I expected and I expected a lot. Why would they be so quiet about it?
Will you be testing Samyang's new 50mm f1.4? that looks like a very promising lens but I heard some bad comments about it's autofocus accuracy.
I wish they've made this lens back in 2018, and I would've rushed out to buy it. The Sony 135mm f/1.8 GM brand new is twice as expensive, but nowadays, you could get one for roughly US$1200~1300 used. The AF speed seems to be very different.
yeah, the af in my 135mm gm is amazing, better than my newer 35mm gm.
I'm in Canada and a used 135mm GM is still close to $2000, if you can even find used ones. This lens is $1300.
Do you think optical performance is equivalent or better than the older manual focus Samyang 135mm f2? That one was nearly apochromatic as well.
I have used the f/2 version. This 135mm f1.8 is more apochromatic than the f2 ED, from the looks Christopher has shown, also from the photo of tree branches against a bright sky shown by Sony alpha blog.
Impressive performance! Would love it, if Samyang get some of their AF lenses out for Nikon and Canon mirrorless. Would be interesting to see, how well the AF would perform on my Z9. Another brilliant review Chris, thank you very much
I just came across your video and you have persuaded me to purchase the lens. And boy oh boy, what an absolute BEAST! Thank you so much. I honestly was about to sell my kidney to buy the Sony version, but thankfully your video saved me from doing that lol.
hope to see this compared to Samyang 135mm f/2.0 ED UMC
How is coma for rendering stars on deep sky photography?
I don't see you review on apsc camera....
Oh good! I just broke out yesterday... I guess I’ll have to get this! 😂 Thank you for consistently putting out great concise reviews, without the glorification and overall Overly opinionated BS like other channels. Keep up the great work, you rock!
Firmware v3.0 for this lens are now available for download ✌✌✌
Really a great lens ! Let us see more portraits . Nice review , thank you .
If only I had the money for this lens. Or a Sony. Or a FF camera XD I'm gonna keep my fingers crossed we start to see some AF lenses for Fuji from Samyang soon. I would love their 35mm f1.2 and 85mm for mirrorless camera's in an AF body on Fuji :D
I bought Sam Yang 24 F1.8 it’s so good definitely buying this 135
Heyy that Korean at the end! 감사합니다. 안녕히계세요!
Wow, it is sharp wide open!
A question, is the focus ring setting a default setting on aperture when AF is used or is the lenstation required for this customisation?
Thank you for review!
A reminder though for potential buyers, if your Sony body is as old as my a7m2, the AF could work WORSE!
I once had a lot AF issues with a Samyang 35mm f1.4 AF, which turned out to work great on another a7m3..
What an incredible lens. 135mm isn't my favorite focal length but holy crap this is good :o
daaaaamn those corners at 1.8. ridiculous sharp.
Chris, please do more vintage L lenses; i would love to see a review on the 28-70 f2.8L and the 28-80 f2.8-4L!
Appreciate saying good bye in Korean at the end of the Korean made lens review video 😀
my first samyang was preordered af 85 1.4, ever since I wont hear for any other lens maker. 135 is next
wow i was not expecting this review hope it delivers as the original did
Unfortunately it’s still not available for Fuji
As a Korean, I was surprised by the last greeting. haha Thank you for the good review.
I am wondering if the corner sharpness test is meaningless. The front element is curved so optically wouldn't the corners be focusing a bit closer than the center? So say if you had a curved dish that just exactly matches the focus on every point, then it'd be tack sharp all throughout?
Dear Christopher 😊 please can you test out the zeiss batis 135mm 2.8 ? Thank you
Excellent review! Eventhough i use fuji. Still great to see Value for Money.
We still can’t get it shipped here in USA. Ordering started in late January.
It kinda reminds me of the old manual version of it to be honest ( I wounded how that hold up to the moden cameras we have now)
The samyang 135mm/f2 MF version still have crazy good optics and I prefer using MF over AF lenses when shooting night skies or the Aurora Borealis ✌
@@dudeiusmannigast1543 i know but it would still be fun to see how well it age and comare to the new ones ( and we didnt see it on the new standard sharpness test picture and disturtion one ) i also prefer mf as well ( my fav glass is a old topcon lens becuase of the old school look it gives to the photo's )
Another excellent example of the E-Mount's biggest strength; Its vast 3rd party lens support. More quality glass at more price points for enthusiasts and great 1st party lenses to save up for/aspire to own.
I take mainly wider angle and landscape shots. May have missed releases, but am not aware of Samyang, Rokkinon, Sigma wide angle zooms.
Are they simply too expensive to produce for what may be regarded as a relatively small market, or have I just missed the release publicity and reviews- which I doubt.
@@robertcudlipp3426 Sigma has a 14-24 F2.8 zoom and Samyang has a 14mm F2.8 and 18mm F2.8 for FE
@@Rollergold4 Thanks, was aware of that, however Samyang, Viltrox, Rokkinon don't appear to have much interest in wide angle zooms. Any idea why?
@@robertcudlipp3426 No Idea, Samyang has only released their first Zoom (a 24-70 2.8) so maybe a wide angle zoom could be next.
Hi Chris, I tested the lens (two copies!) against my trusty old Canon EF 135MM F2 from 1996. Landscape, distance 1km, both lenses fully open. Guess what, the Canon won hands down in resolution. By far, really far at borders and corners, and by a small margin in the center/midfield area. Both lenses with no symetry problems.I would really like to send you the comparison image....
Samyang Germany emailed me today "this is a lens for portraits...sorry for any....." I cannot believe it ..
I find the Rokinon version on Amazon in Canada. Will this be the same lens?
It is several hundred dollars cheaper than the Samyang coming from the U.S.
A glowing review :) pictures certainly were sharp. Great for low light on a Sony A7IV
They also make an f2.0 which is much cheaper. Maybe that's great too? (I see you have reviewed that too)
Just curious how does the sharpness compare with the samyang 135mm F2 ED UMC?
It's sharper
I will be picking one of these up soon, been waiting for a review of it. I wouldn’t mind seeing the 100mm stf lens tested, I own it and think it’s phenomenal, would be interesting to see you test that one.
Hope they'll bring them at some point to the RF mount as well
Wow just wow, an amazing performance, maybe best optic in terms of price to performance ratio ever.
I have the 135 f2 previous manual version of the lens .
how about PQ between them at the same f stops ?
Is it worth stepping to the 1.8 ?
Generally ia m extremely pleased with the F2 but an upgrade if the final result makes is worth it
would be very good news
70 / 5.000
Kết quả dịch
After I finished watching this video, I immediately bought one for myself. I've always been interested in your videos since my Canon days !!! I am also waiting to see your review of the two new models of Samyang's lenses, the 35 f1.4 II and the 50 f1.4 II. Also waiting for you to compare the Tamron 28-75 G2 against the older one. waiting for it, wish you always happy
Yup..this is gonna be the next purchase..135 is just.. Awesome
Stunning lens. Samyang bring it to RF please.
Congrats on the baby :)
samyang seems to be the only one doing RF lenses with AF at this time... i dont know whats different for them but i do hope sigma and tamron will also offer RF lenses soon. Every time i see new lenses for other ML systems i get a slight dose of envy ... :D