That is the first time I’ve seen a turn to final where the bank angle exceeded the altitude 😳 all that matters though is living to fly again tomorrow, well done friend.
I know nothing about aviation, but, when he banked that hard I was stunned - just watched a lot of videos. Couldn't believe he didn't stall the wing....at a low speed. I *think* I understand the basics - apparently not.
Bank angle doesnt kill, G loading does. Turn to final like that is fine as long as the wings are unloaded, sure if he added load (Stick aft) it all would have come undone. But was a deliberate and practiced maneuver
@@AeroSimGaming im guessing you’re just trolling due to the nonsensical statements you made that couldn’t be more incorrect. If so, haha good one. If not, you may want to study.
i learned those turnbacks after EFATO in 1997. This was a partial power engine fail engine i can tell. A Partial Power EFATO Turnback. No need to lower nose under horizon due the first 180 degrees of turn you sort of keep the altitude with some power you have. But you are lower at the 180 deg point than a No power EFATO Turnback. I practiced Partial Power EFATO Turnbacks from 400 agl and No Power EFATo Turnbacks from 800 agl. Piper Cherokee. ELM channel CFi taught me those.
by all means, if you can, use the partial power to get back to the field, just be on the ball, an engine running partially WILL EVENTUALLY QUIT, so best manage your energy on the assumption that it WILL DIE ON YOU at ANY TIME
@@Paul-ll1bt Yup I thought you guys were going awfully fast but then again that’s something you glider guys have a vastly better handle on than fan chasers do. You do it all the time and the prop guys hardly ever even practice a spiral down from right over the airport.
@@drizler If you're low at least go fast. So you don't stall and do the cartwheel with the plane. I once calculated it. We entered the turn with ~150kph, so super fast and exited with 120. With the flaps set like we did right there, stall speed is ~95kph. So it was speedwise a pretty safe turn. In hindsight the river bank would've been safer. But for me being the glider pilot i practiced the going back to the airfield a lot.
@@CFITOMAHAWKIt's the Rotax Engines, they are a bit more modern than for example Lycoming or Continental and mostly used in LSA. Could have definetly cut the engine but it wasn't really necessary.
Heightwise the trees arent the problem. Its the steep turn at the end. I'm the Co-pilot in this flight. And since I am a glider pilot, I trained a similar maneuver a lot. Thtas why we did that. The river bank is in hindsight the better option. But we landed safe, so its okay i guess.
@@Paul-ll1bt especially the last turn right before touchdown looked scary - I was worried you'd hit the ground with a wing. But on the other side judging height based on a video is a hard thing to do. You guys did an absolute great landing! Congratz! What was the reason for the engine failure? Carb icing? Unlikely? Fuel starvation? Mechanical failure?
@Michał Nowak The last turn was by far the scariest thing of this flight. I looked out to the right and there wasn't much space left. Some say about 1,5m. The spark plug in cylinder no. 2 failed, causing the exhaust valves not to close. The engine was shaking pretty violent and we had no more power.
Partial power engine failure from crosswind leg 500 agl. No big deal turnback to do. I used to practice them simulating a partial powr emerg. from 400 agl turning crosswind. Good practice..
I run a flight business in South Korea. I purchased the FK-9 and FK-14 in 2016, but I still haven't received them. If the official sees this article, please answer it. And if you have the same case as me, please leave a comment.
You think that's bad..... I ordered an Airbus A380 in 2007 and still haven't received it. I'm still paying for the T-hangar at my local grass strip. Infuriating.
Heidewitzka auf der Mönchsheide - den Platz kenne ich sehr gut von BBSW und Trainings. Ist ja nochmal gut gegangen. Was war denn die Ursache? Ich konnte es leider nicht richtig erkennen, gab es einen Grund nicht die Querbahn zu nehmen? Gruß aus EDKB
Ich war noch nie auf der Mönchsheide. Aber die AIP kennt nur RWY 10/28 (Grass). Taugt die bei 1:30 rechts im Bild sichtbare „Querbahn“ für eine Landung?
@@avigator nee würde ich gar nicht mal so pauschal sagen. Je nach Wind hat es da am Platz auch ordentliche Leewirbel. Jetzt war er auch noch relativ dicht an der Querbahn bereits dran. Ich denke der Pilot hat in dem Moment richtig entschieden, da er die Situation beurteilte und im Cockpit seine Entscheidung getroffen hat, mit positiven Ausgang. Man darf nicht vergessen die Kameras verfälschen auch viele Eindrücke. Natürlich kann man sage er hätte den Queranflug etwas weiter rauslegen können, um dann mit flacher Querneigung die ganze Länge der angeflogenen Bahn zu nutzen. Aber hey, lass uns fair bleiben, hinterher ist man immer schlauer und RUclipspiloten sind immer besser. In der Notsituation reagieren wir alle unterschiedlich, und er hat es geschafft. Dank Video kann er für sich rekapitulieren, ob er beim nächsten Mal andere Optionen wählt, oder den Anflug taktisch anders ausführt. Das muss er am Ende selber entscheiden.
@@avigator Die Querbahn nutzen wir mehr für Außenlandeübungen etc, nicht wirklich im Regelbetrieb. Liegt vor allem daran dass man über die Windenseile rollen muss. Dazu sind es nur ca. 500m und an beiden Bahnenden sind halt Bäume die bei Wind sehr turbulent werden. Also zum so landen ist die Bahn nicht offen.
@@adventureswiththecrazyvet to be honest, I knew from the beginning that engines don't spin. This was just a social experiment. And you were my first lab rat.
@@michaelkohler3942 Hat dieser Motor nur eine Zündkerze? Weil du schreibst „DIE“ Zündkerze ist gebrochen. Ich kenne es nur so, dass die Motoren pro Zylinder zwei Zündkerzen habe . Fällt eine aus, sollte der Motor immer noch mehr als brauchbar laufen. Oder ist die Zündkerze so gebrochen, dass keine Kompression mehr auf einem Zylinder war? Das vibriert dann natürlich ordentlich.
@@KarlAlfredRoemer Es sind natürlich 2 Zündkerzen. Und es ist genau das passiert. Die Auslassventile standen durch die Bruchstücke wohl offen. Bis ca. 4500rpm hat man das auch nicht gespürt. Erst bei Vollgas hat es geschüttelt.
It's for CO. Sometimes the exhaust can be a bit leaky in these kind of planes. Since the heat being just a hole in the firewall in these things the possibility of a CO poisoning is pretty high.
You have to initially turn 45 degree bank and not 30-35 like in here. With that shallow turn, the circle is bigger and you will lose more alt in it. Also to realign with the runway will require more bank angle like here. Use flaps on the realign to avoid stalling it.
Yeah that's easy to say afterwards or from a keyboard. When being there you need a couple of seconds to think and get things sorted out. It wasn't the best approach possible by any means but it worked out just fine. So we're happy
Look for a too tight bend in the sensor tube going to the VSI. I had that for years in a Cessna 150 and never could quite understand it until I finally tore the tubing out and replumbed it myself. A kink will make it do just that . Mine used to show I was still dropping at 300 FPM when I was turning off to taxi in and I always bobbed like that. Of course it had to be in the worst possible place to get at so it got put off for a long time. Keep in mind it might not look like a real kink but rather a rather sharp bend in the tubing.
There was no problem with the engine. It did not stop. It was not rough. The pilot was able to reduce power several times, with full control. This is clickbait. This is how people make money now. They fooled everybody but me.
0:54 “Motor problem!” with a lot of forest ahead. I have no idea to turn back or what (had the engine stopped). With adequate power the answer is clear.
@@Paul-ll1bt just saying the prop which appears not damaged,doesn’t appear to be any excessive vibration,cant see any vibration through his camera,the prop is spinning which looks to be around idle power.we use this configuration to practice forced landings as a student pilot and beyond,this was either a precautionary landing though engine sounded ok or a simulated forced landing at engine idle adopted by us pilots to closely simulate an engine out.An aircraft acts a bit different in a real engine out as you don’t then have the prop wash going over the control surfaces which aids greatly in controlling the aircraft,when the prop is not spinning there is no prop wash and the controls become a bit heavier and controls inputs are a little less responsive and an aircraft having power issues doesn’t delay getting off runway centre line and definitely doesn’t delay shutting down engine apon touchdown,just saying.
@@Rich6270 Well the prop isn't damaged but the engine is. A spark plug in cylinder 2 failed, so no compression there. It shook pretty violently, I know that because I was in the other seat at that flight.
also ganz ehrlich - ich finde den Anflug und vor allem die letzte steile Rechtskurve ins Final unverantwortlich - man sieht regelrecht wie die FK9 langsam nimmer fliegen will (fliege selber auch das Muster). Wars nur ne Übung? Die Rechtskurve bleibt trotzdem kritisch. Ist nur meine Meinung. Bei einem echten Motorausfall wäre ich im Abflug lieber parallel an den Fluss, aber nie mehr über den Wald
Nein es war keine Übung. Der Motor war echt aus, leider. Auf die Äcker unten am Rhein, wäre aus jetziger Sicht definitiv besser gewesen. Zur letzten Kurve. Die war mehr als schnell genug, wir waren nicht ansatzweise an Stall Geschwindigkeiten. Daher haben wir ja auch so lange zum Aufsetzen bzw. Bremsen gebraucht.
@@Paul-ll1bt ja, nur wenn man live dabei ist kann man es wohl am besten einschätzen. Danke für deine Reaktion/Antwort. Zugegeben kann man im Nachhinein leicht analysieren. Hatte nach dem Start mit einer Da40 Diesel auch schon vollen Kühlwasserverlust (Tiehlert TDI). War nicht lustig. Deshalb ist der Austausch unter Piloten umso wichtiger. Holm- und Rippenbruch bei allen weiteren Flügen (für Nichtflieger: ein guter Wunsch für den Fliegerkameraden)
Also ich sehe in der letzten Kurve kein Problem... deutlich über Stall, er hat ja richtig gut Geschwindigkeit mitgenommen. Man muss mal bedenken, dass man sowas auch mit viel "Gefühl" fliegt. Hier im Video sieht das knapp aus, aber wenn man das live miterlebt, dann spürt man einfach, wie man die Kurve nehmen muss und hat natürlich auch wesentlich mehr Übersicht. Er hat ja nach der Kurve noch richtig Luft um sanft aufzusetzen. Wenn man sein Flugzeug kennt und beherrscht macht man das fast blind.
![Megan Thee Stallion - Bigger In Texas [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QxTkZTLWdo4/mqdefault.jpg)
![PASSENGER LANDS PLANE After Pilot Incapacitation [ATC audio]](/img/1.gif)
Wow. Great job. Not a foot of altitude to spare. Am I the only one who would have gone for the field in front of me instead of doing the 180?
Did the 180 turn help slow him down some more maybe?
@mish5530no not really. from the moment power was lost, it was an emergency landing.
Be surprised what you can get away with in a FK9
Good job that worked out! I was really concerned about him dragging a wingtip and cartwheeling but he made it. The field near the river was tempting.
"kurzes Vergnügen" cracked me up, thanks. 😅
good job bringing her down safely.
Dude practically pulls back into his parking spot lmao! Nice work up there!
The turn at the end was superb!
Holy shit! Congrats on a successful "impossible turn"
with power.
@@shreddder999 Well the engine did quit. But was still running somewhat, wasn't able to maintain altitude tho...
You’d be surprised what those lsa aircraft are capable of ,stuff you’d never get away with in a Cessna or piper
@@spannaspinna yep exactly, they stall at 50-60km/h so around 30kn. Plenty of room for such situations
It was indeed impressive from about 600 ft AGL.
That is the first time I’ve seen a turn to final where the bank angle exceeded the altitude 😳 all that matters though is living to fly again tomorrow, well done friend.
I know nothing about aviation, but, when he banked that hard I was stunned - just watched a lot of videos. Couldn't believe he didn't stall the wing....at a low speed. I *think* I understand the basics - apparently not.
Bank angle doesnt kill, G loading does. Turn to final like that is fine as long as the wings are unloaded, sure if he added load (Stick aft) it all would have come undone. But was a deliberate and practiced maneuver
I’m a flight simulator all assist on pilot and I was thinking the same 🤣🤣🤣
@@AeroSimGaming Of course does the bank angle matter. Increased bank means higher stall speed.
@@AeroSimGaming im guessing you’re just trolling due to the nonsensical statements you made that couldn’t be more incorrect. If so, haha good one. If not, you may want to study.
Das sind diese Momente, wo sich alles in der Magengegend sammelt. Sehr gut gemacht, die Kurve in Bodennähe hatte ich mich nicht getraut.
This dude made an impossible turn look easy. Impressive. But I wouldn’t try that twice lol.
No. The guy made money by posting clickbait. He reduced power several times. Very dramatic! Totally fake.
@@OnerousEthic he cant make money he doesnt have enough subs lol
Having partial power definitely helps.
Fck yeah.... dude is a total boss... I want him as my pilot!!!
Beautiful landing and beautiful plane.
Great job under stress and a very soft landing 🛬
Wow, pants change needed after that one! Great outcome at the end of the day.
Wow! Die Endkurve war echt sportlich, aber Respekt! In so einer Situation die Ruhe zu bewahren ist nicht einfach.
Absolutely incredible
Very nice return and landing Captain.
straight to the point. I love it! Great save!
Hey Trevor Jacob ....are you paying attention??🤣🤣🤣
i learned those turnbacks after EFATO in 1997. This was a partial power engine fail engine i can tell. A Partial Power EFATO Turnback. No need to lower nose under horizon due the first 180 degrees of turn you sort of keep the altitude with some power you have. But you are lower at the 180 deg point than a No power EFATO Turnback. I practiced Partial Power EFATO Turnbacks from 400 agl and No Power EFATo Turnbacks from 800 agl. Piper Cherokee. ELM channel CFi taught me those.
by all means, if you can, use the partial power to get back to the field, just be on the ball, an engine running partially WILL EVENTUALLY QUIT, so best manage your energy on the assumption that it WILL DIE ON YOU at ANY TIME
@@MedicWarrior27 That is why is better to turnback to closest runway than turnaround the airport.
@@CFITOMAHAWK well, as situation requires.
An immediate 180 after takeoff is discouraged
Note how he did that impossible turn VERY GENTLY. It’s either got to be that or a 😓 wing over to pull that off. Great job!
if he would have no power he would of stalled and fallen on that tight turn.
@CSJiGSaW Well no. It's called kinetic energy. We carried more than enough speed even after that turn...
@@Paul-ll1bt Yup I thought you guys were going awfully fast but then again that’s something you glider guys have a vastly better handle on than fan chasers do. You do it all the time and the prop guys hardly ever even practice a spiral down from right over the airport.
@@drizler If you're low at least go fast. So you don't stall and do the cartwheel with the plane.
I once calculated it. We entered the turn with ~150kph, so super fast and exited with 120. With the flaps set like we did right there, stall speed is ~95kph. So it was speedwise a pretty safe turn.
In hindsight the river bank would've been safer. But for me being the glider pilot i practiced the going back to the airfield a lot.
@@Paul-ll1bt Well done.. The Possible Turnback Turn.
Awesome Job
!Great learning aid
God blessed your flight !!!
Why can't god keep an eye on his engine? Useless god.
I applauded that guy for that amazing landing. Hell Yea!
Exceptional flying sir.
Either the pilot or co-pilot were speaking German; I'm fluent in the language. Excellent landing by PIC!
Some say this happened in the UK but they spontaneously started speaking German so they could swear harder.
@@ElectricityTaster haha, quality comment, we lead the world in imaginative swearology!
mönchsheide! toller platz, tolle landung!
Stunning! well done that pilot!!!!
Cut the mixture and cut the flaps as soon you start floating. A good trick to stop sooner.
There is no mixture to adjust in those aircraft...
@@Paul-ll1bt An airplane that you cannot adjust the mixture. Rare. So use the ignition key to cut engine if floating too much.
@@CFITOMAHAWKIt's the Rotax Engines, they are a bit more modern than for example Lycoming or Continental and mostly used in LSA.
Could have definetly cut the engine but it wasn't really necessary.
Richtig gut gemacht! Gratulation
The H2s monitor is cracking me up.
Its a CO monitor :)
Beautiful!
I would have gone for the river bank
Way risky over all the trees. well done.
Heightwise the trees arent the problem. Its the steep turn at the end. I'm the Co-pilot in this flight. And since I am a glider pilot, I trained a similar maneuver a lot. Thtas why we did that. The river bank is in hindsight the better option. But we landed safe, so its okay i guess.
@@Paul-ll1bt Yes well done.
@@Paul-ll1bt especially the last turn right before touchdown looked scary - I was worried you'd hit the ground with a wing. But on the other side judging height based on a video is a hard thing to do. You guys did an absolute great landing! Congratz!
What was the reason for the engine failure? Carb icing? Unlikely? Fuel starvation? Mechanical failure?
@Michał Nowak The last turn was by far the scariest thing of this flight. I looked out to the right and there wasn't much space left. Some say about 1,5m.
The spark plug in cylinder no. 2 failed, causing the exhaust valves not to close. The engine was shaking pretty violent and we had no more power.
@@Paul-ll1bt Yes indeed.
Been waiting a long time for a legit reason to say this... Verarsh du mish!
what does this mean?
Did you mean "verarschst du mich"?
@@konebestplayer "are you assing me" 😜
@@konebestplayer are "you kidding me" would be the english meaning ...
Great pilot.
Time to make another trip to the engine store.
Interessante Landung, gut gemacht. Ich hätte die Querbahn genommen 👍👍
The altimeter seems to suspect something fishy. It flutters right from the start.
2:00 Buttered the bread my friends:)🥳🥳🥳
Wow. Perfect landing.
Good Job, well done, colleague.
the big brain move in such situations is turning your plane nose up and landing with autorotation
Ĺol
Last German sentence was: Ach du scheiße was war das? Holy shit, what was that? :D
Partial power engine failure from crosswind leg 500 agl. No big deal turnback to do. I used to practice them simulating a partial powr emerg. from 400 agl turning crosswind. Good practice..
You're so smart.
1:48 woa hah ah disturbed moment
Good job... but what's the deal with the altimeter??
As we say in the Force, that was some Big Pimpin' Flying
I run a flight business in South Korea. I purchased the FK-9 and FK-14 in 2016, but I still haven't received them. If the official sees this article, please answer it. And if you have the same case as me, please leave a comment.
Bruh. You got scammed.
@@JetLeg2284 Genious...
You think that's bad..... I ordered an Airbus A380 in 2007 and still haven't received it. I'm still paying for the T-hangar at my local grass strip. Infuriating.
Why does he have an H2S detector (Cricket) attached on the left side?
Its a carbon monoxide (CO) monitor for leaky exhausts.
Pilot Before landing : Schaize
Pilot after landing : Das is goot
Wow, that was scary!
Very steep final turn! Walking the line on that one
He still had some speed
And a spot landing too!
Heidewitzka auf der Mönchsheide - den Platz kenne ich sehr gut von BBSW und Trainings. Ist ja nochmal gut gegangen. Was war denn die Ursache? Ich konnte es leider nicht richtig erkennen, gab es einen Grund nicht die Querbahn zu nehmen? Gruß aus EDKB
Ich war noch nie auf der Mönchsheide. Aber die AIP kennt nur RWY 10/28 (Grass). Taugt die bei 1:30 rechts im Bild sichtbare „Querbahn“ für eine Landung?
@@avigator im Notfall mit passendem Wind ja.
@@Akaflieger Danke. In diesem Fall hätte ich mir wahrscheinlich die letzte Kurve gespart und wäre auf die inoffizielle Querbahn gegangen.
@@avigator nee würde ich gar nicht mal so pauschal sagen. Je nach Wind hat es da am Platz auch ordentliche Leewirbel. Jetzt war er auch noch relativ dicht an der Querbahn bereits dran. Ich denke der Pilot hat in dem Moment richtig entschieden, da er die Situation beurteilte und im Cockpit seine Entscheidung getroffen hat, mit positiven Ausgang. Man darf nicht vergessen die Kameras verfälschen auch viele Eindrücke. Natürlich kann man sage er hätte den Queranflug etwas weiter rauslegen können, um dann mit flacher Querneigung die ganze Länge der angeflogenen Bahn zu nutzen. Aber hey, lass uns fair bleiben, hinterher ist man immer schlauer und RUclipspiloten sind immer besser. In der Notsituation reagieren wir alle unterschiedlich, und er hat es geschafft. Dank Video kann er für sich rekapitulieren, ob er beim nächsten Mal andere Optionen wählt, oder den Anflug taktisch anders ausführt. Das muss er am Ende selber entscheiden.
@@avigator Die Querbahn nutzen wir mehr für Außenlandeübungen etc, nicht wirklich im Regelbetrieb. Liegt vor allem daran dass man über die Windenseile rollen muss. Dazu sind es nur ca. 500m und an beiden Bahnenden sind halt Bäume die bei Wind sehr turbulent werden. Also zum so landen ist die Bahn nicht offen.
You know things are bad when the engine spins the wrong way.
lol what
@@adventureswiththecrazyvet , of course they do! How are you trying to be a troll?
@@adventureswiththecrazyvet to be honest, I knew from the beginning that engines don't spin. This was just a social experiment. And you were my first lab rat.
This social experiment interests me. Does anyone actually believe that the engine is capable of “spinning the wrong way?”
It’s moving so fast it appears to spin backwards
Brr...... knappe Nummer, dennoch gut gemacht. Was war denn die Ursache für den Leistungsverlust ?
Die Zündkerze ist gebrochen...
@@michaelkohler3942 was no nie gehört ... ja wie geht das schlug da wer drauf tss
@@michaelkohler3942 Hat dieser Motor nur eine Zündkerze? Weil du schreibst „DIE“ Zündkerze ist gebrochen. Ich kenne es nur so, dass die Motoren pro Zylinder zwei Zündkerzen habe . Fällt eine aus, sollte der Motor immer noch mehr als brauchbar laufen. Oder ist die Zündkerze so gebrochen, dass keine Kompression mehr auf einem Zylinder war? Das vibriert dann natürlich ordentlich.
@@KarlAlfredRoemer Es sind natürlich 2 Zündkerzen. Und es ist genau das passiert. Die Auslassventile standen durch die Bruchstücke wohl offen. Bis ca. 4500rpm hat man das auch nicht gespürt. Erst bei Vollgas hat es geschüttelt.
@@Paul-ll1bt Komisch.
sieht nach der Mönchsheide aus, gut gemacht
Bet that cleared the ol bowels.
practis?
Is It a Rotax?
Ooooha! Die Rechtskurve sah echt verboten aus..! Hatte echt Schiss. Aber: seeehr gut gemacht. Top!
this guy had enough airspeed to do whatever turn he wanted.. Forget best glide.. Trying to milk it , will kill you..
was war damals die Ursache?
Eine gebrochene Zündkerze in Zylinder 2, die die Auslassventile blockiert hat. Damit keine Kompression und Leistung.
great job!!!
I noticed the BW Clip next to the windscreen. I saw this in the thumbnail and had to clicked. Whay do you have it? Is it CO or an O2?
It's for CO. Sometimes the exhaust can be a bit leaky in these kind of planes. Since the heat being just a hole in the firewall in these things the possibility of a CO poisoning is pretty high.
@@Paul-ll1bt Wear Yellow. Work Safe.
I used to be a PM for portable gas detectors for Honeywell.
playing with fire, return to runway at 600 ft !!
Very nice!
You have to initially turn 45 degree bank and not 30-35 like in here. With that shallow turn, the circle is bigger and you will lose more alt in it. Also to realign with the runway will require more bank angle like here. Use flaps on the realign to avoid stalling it.
Yeah that's easy to say afterwards or from a keyboard. When being there you need a couple of seconds to think and get things sorted out.
It wasn't the best approach possible by any means but it worked out just fine. So we're happy
WHICH AIRCRAFT IS THAT?
FK-9 Mk. 4 I think. Could be wrong on the generation tho.
Sehr gute Landung.
Nice h2s meter bro
I would just jump out of the plane... 😂
Unfortunately he forgot to put his parachute on and tuck those fire extinguishers in his pants.
nice landing
What the hell is wrong with that Altimeter?
Look for a too tight bend in the sensor tube going to the VSI. I had that for years in a Cessna 150 and never could quite understand it until I finally tore the tubing out and replumbed it myself. A kink will make it do just that . Mine used to show I was still dropping at 300 FPM when I was turning off to taxi in and I always bobbed like that. Of course it had to be in the worst possible place to get at so it got put off for a long time. Keep in mind it might not look like a real kink but rather a rather sharp bend in the tubing.
Good job
what was a problem with engine?
it failed
@@duffelbag5682 Kaput
It stopped
Aufwiedersein
There was no problem with the engine. It did not stop. It was not rough. The pilot was able to reduce power several times, with full control.
This is clickbait. This is how people make money now. They fooled everybody but me.
Translation; Holy Crap, that was close!
Not quite: "Ach du Scheisse, was war das?"
Holy shit, what was that?
@@Mp57navy if you wanna be pedantic at least correct somebody correctly..or where is the word heilige in there?
Good job missing that gutter..lol
Impressive
Hallo, was war denn passiert?
Die Zündkerze in Zylinder 2 ist gebrochen. Hat die Auslassventile nicht mehr schließen lassen. Der Motor hat keine Leistung mehr gebracht.
@@Paul-ll1bt Krass, sowas habe ich ja auch noch nicht gehört....Da hat doch wahrscheinlich bei der letzten Kontrolle jemand die Kerze beschädigt....
@@wilioto3572 Naja der Motor hatte noch keine 200h. Da kommen mittlerweile andere Kerzen rein. Das ganze ging sogar noch auf Garantie.
What a legend.
0:48 motor problem
"Ach du Schaise aldder was war das"
ruclips.net/video/cxfxuQo3g_U/видео.html What would Trevor Jacob do?
Oh no!
0:54 “Motor problem!” with a lot of forest ahead. I have no idea to turn back or what (had the engine stopped). With adequate power the answer is clear.
00:48 “Motor problem”
00:54 “Which side airport..?”
Simulated Forced Landing,engine still running even after landing though great entertainment.
Just because its running doesn't mean its working properly.
@@Paul-ll1bt just saying the prop which appears not damaged,doesn’t appear to be any excessive vibration,cant see any vibration through his camera,the prop is spinning which looks to be around idle power.we use this configuration to practice forced landings as a student pilot and beyond,this was either a precautionary landing though engine sounded ok or a simulated forced landing at engine idle adopted by us pilots to closely simulate an engine out.An aircraft acts a bit different in a real engine out as you don’t then have the prop wash going over the control surfaces which aids greatly in controlling the aircraft,when the prop is not spinning there is no prop wash and the controls become a bit heavier and controls inputs are a little less responsive and an aircraft having power issues doesn’t delay getting off runway centre line and definitely doesn’t delay shutting down engine apon touchdown,just saying.
@@Rich6270 Well the prop isn't damaged but the engine is. A spark plug in cylinder 2 failed, so no compression there. It shook pretty violently, I know that because I was in the other seat at that flight.
@@Paul-ll1bt yep have to admit it’s not a good feeling,had a plug go myself in a PA28 over Sydney,it does rearrange the priorities a bit.
Very lucky.
👏👏👏 Bravo
also ganz ehrlich - ich finde den Anflug und vor allem die letzte steile Rechtskurve ins Final unverantwortlich - man sieht regelrecht wie die FK9 langsam nimmer fliegen will (fliege selber auch das Muster). Wars nur ne Übung? Die Rechtskurve bleibt trotzdem kritisch. Ist nur meine Meinung. Bei einem echten Motorausfall wäre ich im Abflug lieber parallel an den Fluss, aber nie mehr über den Wald
Nein es war keine Übung. Der Motor war echt aus, leider. Auf die Äcker unten am Rhein, wäre aus jetziger Sicht definitiv besser gewesen.
Zur letzten Kurve. Die war mehr als schnell genug, wir waren nicht ansatzweise an Stall Geschwindigkeiten. Daher haben wir ja auch so lange zum Aufsetzen bzw. Bremsen gebraucht.
@@Paul-ll1bt ja, nur wenn man live dabei ist kann man es wohl am besten einschätzen. Danke für deine Reaktion/Antwort. Zugegeben kann man im Nachhinein leicht analysieren. Hatte nach dem Start mit einer Da40 Diesel auch schon vollen Kühlwasserverlust (Tiehlert TDI). War nicht lustig. Deshalb ist der Austausch unter Piloten umso wichtiger. Holm- und Rippenbruch bei allen weiteren Flügen (für Nichtflieger: ein guter Wunsch für den Fliegerkameraden)
Also ich sehe in der letzten Kurve kein Problem... deutlich über Stall, er hat ja richtig gut Geschwindigkeit mitgenommen.
Man muss mal bedenken, dass man sowas auch mit viel "Gefühl" fliegt. Hier im Video sieht das knapp aus, aber wenn man das live miterlebt, dann spürt man einfach, wie man die Kurve nehmen muss und hat natürlich auch wesentlich mehr Übersicht.
Er hat ja nach der Kurve noch richtig Luft um sanft aufzusetzen. Wenn man sein Flugzeug kennt und beherrscht macht man das fast blind.
👌👌👌👌
Shaizer! 🤯
Gut gemacht
Super Ingo!
Nicht Diesel.
nice
alles entspannt..für eine Übung ganz ok....
das sieht fast aus wie geplant
Nope, don't like the steep turns so low. Successful gladly, but not recommended.
All these shitty small airplanes always have engine trouble
Not always. Sometimes they work.
Look at it this way. At least you can’t possibly get stuck and starve to death up there🤔🤥
How to dont fly
*not
Ach, du Scheisse....
Fake. He cut the engine himself