We just bought a 2.7 l turbo Silverado trail Boss custom had about 3 days I can't believe it has so much power for 4 cylinder on my work trucks are Chevy 350s but I'm super impressed with this I do hope it holds up and has some longevity to it but sharp looking truck rides beautiful haven't towed with it yet but glad to see it can tow in his video
Should last most people through the warranty. After that??? Cars are like that more and more these days. Overcomplicated and overstressed. You do get cool animated dash displays though. 😂
I was at the dealer yesterday looking at em the guy said that gm is so confident in these engines they put a 100k power train warranty on the 2024 model years and the 5.3 still comes with 60k warranty sounds like gm just built another bulletproof engine they’ve always been good engine builders lots of very reliable engines that if taken care of can run 300k the only thing that’s gonna help longevity of this engine is instead of the recommended 10000 miles oil change I’d change at 5k because turbos need clean oil
Unbelievably excited for this motor in the new Canyon/Colorado. Thing should be an absolute rocket ship. That's more torque than a Corvette C6 made a few generations ago.
I paid under $7,000 for an '07 that still runs like new. With what I saved not buying a $50,000 new truck I can keep that nice old Silverado alive forever.
can't wait to test drive a 2023 Chevy Colorado Trail Boss with this same motor in it with 310hp and 430 foot pounds of torque with the High Output tune.
Just got one about a month ago now. I love it. I towed 18’ trailer with slide outs dual axle no problem down the highway at 65mph. I had gmc Sierra 1500 before this with the 5.3 vortec and this 4 banger is better.
While driving on what looks like a flat road, you mentioned you were getting 11 MPG at 55 MPH while pulling the Sierra. You didn't mention the gas mileage while pulling the Sierra on the flat road at 67 to 72 MPH. That would have been useful to know, as well.
I own a 22 2.7 Silverado. I've towed 10k, driven it across USA. It's a great truck no issues period. 40k miles. Have beat it day after day. I'd buy another no questions asked. Gets 24mpg in 6th gear towing. Have gotten 27mpg on hot summer days long road trips (1300 miles) mpg gets better when motor is hot on long trips.
Ford competition with GM for gas mileage has been fun to watch. Ford came out with 3.5L ecoboost thinking they had a winner, however a 5.3L with cylinder deactivation is 2.65L. So Ford made their 2.7 ecoboost to better compete with the 5.3l on mpg. GM in turn designs their 2.7T with cylinder deactivation so its only a 1.35L engine in 2 cylinder mode. So not only does the GM 2.7T make better torque, real world it has potential for much better mpg than the Ford 2.7 ecoboost. The 4 cylinder turbo is also less complicated with a single turbo vs twin turbos on the Ford v6.
gereat video. Chevy should make a video like this to give hope. from seeing this video, this truck should be able to pull a mini excavator and skids steer. Im planning on buying on within a few months, and this really helped with my decision.
We need to have towing videos with the electric hummer and Silverado. We are getting a demo HummerEV at some point. I'm hoping we can shoot some video doing the same thing with it.
Love my Trail Boss 2.7 HO turbo and everything was good in this video until @01:10 when I noticed no 4LO. Makes me happy to have the Trail Boss edition even more.
Well no offense but Gm ,ford and ram can keep all those turbocharged engines you want. I might consider a diesel if I have to drop to a 6 cylinder. But I wouldn’t buy anything other than a v-8 in a pickup
GM has been making this engine since 2019, they've had time to iron out most faults. Most people trade in their vehicles after 4-6 years with under 100k miles on the clock... for that, I'd imagine this should be perfectly fine -- 99% of vehicles are up for that task. If you're looking to run it 10+ years and 200k+ miles, Id look elsewhere... something naturally aspirated without cylinder deactivation would be your safest bet.
Buy new from a dealer with a lifetime powertrain warranty if you plan to pile the miles on and keep up with recommended maintenance. GM hasn't broken this motor yet, and upped the torque...it's mostly tuning. The new Colorado is getting the same Power plant, detuned...with the option of tuning it up to 391/430... less parts to go bad in a straight 4, less mating surfaces to seal. Imagine what they could do with an extra cylinder or two..
34 miles on the truck and already pulling with it? My '22 owner's manual said no tow before 500 miles, supposed to be for the rear diff not the engine? Would no way trade my 3.0 for the 2.7 or 5.3
Except this isn't the same transmission this Glade Goodrich is complaining about. Been revamped and there's videos debunking that myth. Crybaby gonna cry though.
Now see that's the difference. General Motors actually plans on these trucks being on the road for many many years. Ford has the exact opposite opinion. They figured will get them out the door and if anybody needs to do some serious work with the truck door not going to buy these anyway and they were right. Occasionally I seen EcoBoost with over 200k on it but generally it's hurt and it's been maintained more than necessary. Seeing a 5-3 for instance with three to four hundred thousand miles on it is just a normal day
Has anyone done a high mileage longevity test on the 4 cylinder! Doing over 100K of very mixed driving/towing and following all of the manufacturer recommended maintenance.
The 2.7 with originally from the Cadillac division of General Motors. It was absolutely put through its Paces because it was sold as a performance option from one of their sedans. The stuff that was done to that motor throughout its testing was pretty ridiculous quite frankly and they really didn't have any issues. Sadly the work that it's putting it in that truck probably isn't any worse.
@bradb8055 Ive seen a odometer on a 21 2.7 that tows a 7400lbs camper sitting at 206k. Ask if there has been any issues, only thing he said was something about a brake sensor that was replaced.
How is it a less complicated motor? The 5.3 is something you never have to worry about. The turbos are alot of system to worry about. Just like my dad ford. It's nice and easy to tow with a turbo engine but there are more parts to have to fix. Cooler lines mainly. And if he had the 5.0 he would get the same mileage and prolly tow just the same.
You know how many 5.3s and 6.2s have shit lifters and needed an motor before the first oil change? Oh yeah ain’t gotta worry about anything but putting a motor in it 🤣
@@freedomisntfree_44 the lifters failed because people would use conventional oil rather than synthetic like the GM engineers specifically stated in the manual. The oil valleys leading to the lifters 100% will clog if synthetic is not used or the oil is not changed within maintenance cycles, the lifters are actually fairly good as long as they are oiled properly. AFM also played a part in the valleys getting clogged, It was a terrible design in the end but the AFM can be turned off in 3 minutes with a tuner and it becomes a very solid engine. My AFM 5.3 is running like a clock at 221k miles.
@@freedomisntfree_44 Yes, it's the only way GM can keep the same design while meeting gov mandates, AFM can be deleted electronically and all problems resolved. The LS was literally designed by racecar engine builders so ease of access to fix this shit is stupid simple. The LS platform is super simple and cheap to fix. I can have the engine out of the truck and stripped down in less than 8 hours.
I have the 2021 Sierra with the same motor(2.7) and I use the premium (93 octane) I drive alot and I see it last longer than reg 87 octane and I feel it has full power with the 93 octane But everyone has different driving habits so things can be different I’ve towed a big bbq grill and have had no issues it feels like I’m not towing anything Aside from that I’ve switched over to the royal purple full synthetic oil bc I work my truck 10-12 hrs a day and I also feel that the truck performs better than when i was using Mobil full synthetic This truck engine is practical for the handyman/plumber/gardener/carwash detailing business/ or any other business model that doesn’t really need the full power of a V8 engine but can still benefit from the vehicle tax deduction and the use that a truck gives for multiple types of jobs that one would do around town Highway is where this engine shines I get about 35mpg with city at 18-19mpg At the end of the day should a person run the engine to the ground and get to the point where they must replace the engine they can always opt to get the 5.3 or 6.2 engine instead of another 4cyl
I dont know anything about this 4 banger, is it almost like half a v8.? Whats the cylinder bore is it smaller.? They would a PIA to own and maintain especially with real high mileage
Wait till you need to change something like the timing belt and you have to separate the transmission from the motor because timing belt is the back,5.3 timing belt in front, nice motor but servicing when higher km is way more difficult than 5.3.
I been driving a 5.3 and the worst thing about them is 3.23 axle ratio.not meant to tow anything. Absolute crap milage when you evenpull a 1000 lb trailer.
Let’s get this straight-you’re towing a load that’s heavier than the tow vehicle and you’re worried about braking? That’s what you should NOT be worried about if the trailer has a proper braking system. Forget acceleration unless you’re drag racing.
Or you can just turn on your emergency flashers and parking lights to see if your parking, turn signals and brake lights work. Don't need a five thousand dollar computer for that.
@@Jisstifer83626 I finally got to hear one a few days ago on the road I hope that you don’t have to hear it inside the truck it’s not a good sound that 4 cylinder noise and the turbo whining noise it definitely needs a card in it’s spokes and not a exhaust system to make that engine sound louder I want to see some higher mileage reviews not just a new truck review and I don’t see very many of them for any vehicle
You're either misinformed or lying, which doesn't surprise me considering you're a dealer. The 5.3 makes 45 MORE horsepower, 35 MORE ft/lbs of torque(for 2021) and to top it all off the V8 actually gets slightly better fuel economy. I would also like to mention the pushrod design of the 5.3 is nearly a century old, it is literally one of the most simple designs of any other motor on the market right now, turbos adds much more complexity as the bearings and blades will eventually wear down to the point of rebuilding or replacing the turbo. Boosting an engine will also cause much more compression in the combustion chamber, leading to blown head gaskets at shorter intervals. Did I mention the added compression in the combustion requires higher octane fuel to prevent knocking, sure you could use 87 but you the knock sensors will tell the ECM to pull timing, leading to a reduction in horsepower, torque, and fuel efficiency. The 5.3 is a workhorse, it was never meant to be a race engine, (although it holds the stock bottom end 1/4 mile WORLD RECORD) it will last you 300k miles at a minimum if you keep the oil clean. The 2.7 is something GM is pushing because the government is forcing them to sell however many trash emissions engines for every V8. The sad part, like I said is the 5.3 is rated by the literal EPA to have better fuel economy.
@@Steven-xj2rf I mean I can choose to work on a ultra complex turbo motor that sounds like a suped up Honda or just stick with the tried and true, easy to work on v8s hmmm which one to pick
@@adamsmiths3016 "ULTRA COMPLEX". That is funny. These things are not complex. The problem is the 2.7T is superior to the POS 5.3L V8 in useable power at below 3000rpm. The 2.7T TRUMPS the 5.3L in torque made which is what you want in a truck. I prefer the better product period.
@Adam Smith’s you could also stick with tried and true easy to work on 3 speed transmissions, carburetors, 350 v8s, AM only radios, drum brakes, and a long list of other things that are going on the History Channel soon. 😀
I was too excited to jump in and get going, I wasn't versed in the controls enough to pull up towing Temps until after we finished shooting the video. I believe the temp never got much over 180. If I get an opportunity to do this again, I will pull a hill with it and watch Temps. The good news is that GM rates max towing on a 15 degree incline at a minimum speed of 40mph sustained to determine capacity, this is at 100F outdoor temps.
Our dealership has a lifetime warranty on every new vehicle we sell to the original owner on all internally lubricated parts, which includes the turbo.
I'm sure all services have to be done by dealership and we all know how that works, you'll have to take there word for what's needing to be replaced and if you don't agree warranty no longer exists, and believe me they will dollar you to death
The new HD 2.7's are robust. As with anything frequent oil changes and using oil that is designed to mitigate LSPI. With the turbo motor, it consumes less fuel at idle, low speeds and since this engine is so bizarrely good at avoiding knock it has more torque, by a lot, at lower speeds. When you're in higher elevation the turbo will be able to compensate to reach torque request, whereas NA is at a disadvantage. V8's have gotten much more worrisome. DI, VVT. Cylinder deactivation, and 4 more cylinders that might have a failure (coils, etc) There is nothing at all wrong with the V8's. And actually at lowerspeeds where the intake pressure is greater than exhaust back pressure the engine has a higher pumping efficiency. When they map that with DI you can run stoich or near stoich (same as NA) so you arent dumping more fuel to accommodate the boost.
Screw GM! There is nothing wrong with the power of the 5.3. If you need to have more turbo the 5.3!!! It's what we all want, just blow all the other truck on the road away. 2.7... SMH...
Ford has had a 2.7 in their trucks for years. Their 3.5 is rated for 13,500 lbs. The Chevy 2.7 turbo feels less strained than the 5.3 in a side by side comparison. It's easy to sit back and say something is bad vs actually experiencing it. Come down to the dealership and get a seat of the pants experience.
@@jasonbrushett2005 Sure don't. I have however been judging you by your comments... I come from a background of cattle ranching, logging, & oil & gas wells... I can see the city in people so easily.
If I had a nickle for everything I've heard that, I'd have two nickles. But if that were the case, why do they turbocharge diesels...like all the time?
@@marcvivori1561 did you even look at the video? He's cruising at 70mph and the darn thing revs around 2200rpm. I don't think 200rpm will grenade an engine 🤣
@@ProbeGT2 Did you hear that engine getting up to speed? Old school here will take the V8. The 302 has been running for billions of miles. They can get 750hp out of it easily but I’m happy with an easy 400hp.
@@marcvivori1561 you think flooring a v8 with 8000lbs behind it won't rev 5000 rpm? Jesus Christ, stop whining on youtube and try to learn engineering a bit.
If that's how you determine something is garbage, there's a lot of garbage out there you'd better stay away from. Why would we put a lifetime warranty on something we weren't willing to back up?
Lol right yes, a warranty or in other words, a commitment by the manufacturer that they will pay for repairs for the life of the vehicle means it’s garbage. Having a very limited or no warranty at all means the manufacturer can dash out anytime for any reason to leave you high and dry.
@Texasfan88 that's not a commitment by the manufacturer, that's a commitment by the dealership. It's also not restricted by having to be worked only only by us.
Good luck 20,000 miles down the road with that 4 cylinder engine. We can check with Consumer Reports Magazine. I wouldn't trust a sales person in regard to his/her opinion. The 4 cylinder engine sounds like an old Chevrolet Vega!!!
Once upon a time the 454 made 230hp 385tq. Then the vortec came out in 96 290hp 410tq. So look how far we’ve come a 2.7 4 cylinder making 310/430.
We just bought a 2.7 l turbo Silverado trail Boss custom had about 3 days I can't believe it has so much power for 4 cylinder on my work trucks are Chevy 350s but I'm super impressed with this I do hope it holds up and has some longevity to it but sharp looking truck rides beautiful haven't towed with it yet but glad to see it can tow in his video
It's all about torque, and that engine has loads of it
The power is definitely there. My concern is longevity.
Should last most people through the warranty. After that??? Cars are like that more and more these days. Overcomplicated and overstressed. You do get cool animated dash displays though. 😂
I was at the dealer yesterday looking at em the guy said that gm is so confident in these engines they put a 100k power train warranty on the 2024 model years and the 5.3 still comes with 60k warranty sounds like gm just built another bulletproof engine they’ve always been good engine builders lots of very reliable engines that if taken care of can run 300k the only thing that’s gonna help longevity of this engine is instead of the recommended 10000 miles oil change I’d change at 5k because turbos need clean oil
Worried about nothing.
Highest one i know of is 206k. No issues. Pulls 7400lbs camper 90% of total mileage.
Unbelievably excited for this motor in the new Canyon/Colorado. Thing should be an absolute rocket ship. That's more torque than a Corvette C6 made a few generations ago.
Love the redesign and the updated Google enhanced dash. Everything great about the new Silverado in a compact package.
Juat got a 2024 and im lovin it. Aftwr a month we will see what my thoughts are 😊
I paid under $7,000 for an '07 that still runs like new. With what I saved not buying a $50,000 new truck I can keep that nice old Silverado alive forever.
My brother bought a 21 Sierra with 3.0 Duramax and really likes it. Fuel economy is really good too
can't wait to test drive a 2023 Chevy Colorado Trail Boss with this same motor in it with 310hp and 430 foot pounds of torque with the High Output tune.
I own a 5.3. Have a 2.7 rental rn. The 2.7 really don't get better mpg . It feels peppeier out of thr hole but that's it
Just got one about a month ago now. I love it. I towed 18’ trailer with slide outs dual axle no problem down the highway at 65mph. I had gmc Sierra 1500 before this with the 5.3 vortec and this 4 banger is better.
While driving on what looks like a flat road, you mentioned you were getting 11 MPG at 55 MPH while pulling the Sierra. You didn't mention the gas mileage while pulling the Sierra on the flat road at 67 to 72 MPH. That would have been useful to know, as well.
I own a 22 2.7 Silverado. I've towed 10k, driven it across USA. It's a great truck no issues period. 40k miles. Have beat it day after day. I'd buy another no questions asked. Gets 24mpg in 6th gear towing. Have gotten 27mpg on hot summer days long road trips (1300 miles) mpg gets better when motor is hot on long trips.
Fords 2.7 Ecoboost is a winner and I'm sure this will be a winner for GM too.If I wasn't a Ford guy I'd choose this engine in any GM truck
I think the 2.7 and 3.5 ecoboosts are changing people's perception about needing a big motor to get half ton stuff done.
@@minnesotamike7132 I have to agree 100%
Also agree.
GM had to make a little more torque than Fords 2.7, however that 3.5 is nuts
Ford competition with GM for gas mileage has been fun to watch. Ford came out with 3.5L ecoboost thinking they had a winner, however a 5.3L with cylinder deactivation is 2.65L. So Ford made their 2.7 ecoboost to better compete with the 5.3l on mpg. GM in turn designs their 2.7T with cylinder deactivation so its only a 1.35L engine in 2 cylinder mode.
So not only does the GM 2.7T make better torque, real world it has potential for much better mpg than the Ford 2.7 ecoboost. The 4 cylinder turbo is also less complicated with a single turbo vs twin turbos on the Ford v6.
gereat video. Chevy should make a video like this to give hope. from seeing this video, this truck should be able to pull a mini excavator and skids steer. Im planning on buying on within a few months, and this really helped with my decision.
We need to have towing videos with the electric hummer and Silverado. We are getting a demo HummerEV at some point. I'm hoping we can shoot some video doing the same thing with it.
Looks like displacement just got replaced
anyone can argue witch is better 2.7 or 5.3, just never get advise from sales personal or dealerships
Love my Trail Boss 2.7 HO turbo and everything was good in this video until @01:10 when I noticed no 4LO. Makes me happy to have the Trail Boss edition even more.
I’m starting to think you all are getting kick backs for promoting the 2/7
Well no offense but Gm ,ford and ram can keep all those turbocharged engines you want. I might consider a diesel if I have to drop to a 6 cylinder. But I wouldn’t buy anything other than a v-8 in a pickup
If you buy a newer GM V8, youre really running a 2 cylinder engine most of the time due to cylinder deactivation...
But the numbers show 4cyl as the better options
Not concerned about power from a turbo, but how will it hold up over time?
GM has been making this engine since 2019, they've had time to iron out most faults. Most people trade in their vehicles after 4-6 years with under 100k miles on the clock... for that, I'd imagine this should be perfectly fine -- 99% of vehicles are up for that task. If you're looking to run it 10+ years and 200k+ miles, Id look elsewhere... something naturally aspirated without cylinder deactivation would be your safest bet.
Buy new from a dealer with a lifetime powertrain warranty if you plan to pile the miles on and keep up with recommended maintenance. GM hasn't broken this motor yet, and upped the torque...it's mostly tuning. The new Colorado is getting the same Power plant, detuned...with the option of tuning it up to 391/430... less parts to go bad in a straight 4, less mating surfaces to seal. Imagine what they could do with an extra cylinder or two..
@@minnesotamikesworld7572 apparently the up torqued engine has had a ton of changes and revisions just to make it bulletproof.
34 miles on the truck and already pulling with it? My '22 owner's manual said no tow before 500 miles, supposed to be for the rear diff not the engine? Would no way trade my 3.0 for the 2.7 or 5.3
With the pickups being manufactured today, who needs a Cadillac.???
I might buy one if it wasn't for that junk 8 speed transmission.
There is barely a video on RUclips on vehicles without someone complaining about the transmission in the comments 🙄
Except this isn't the same transmission this Glade Goodrich is complaining about. Been revamped and there's videos debunking that myth. Crybaby gonna cry though.
GM sounds like they are getting back to their original “5 years planned obsolescence” plan, sticking a hyper-tuned 4-cylinder in a full size pickup!
Now see that's the difference. General Motors actually plans on these trucks being on the road for many many years. Ford has the exact opposite opinion. They figured will get them out the door and if anybody needs to do some serious work with the truck door not going to buy these anyway and they were right. Occasionally I seen EcoBoost with over 200k on it but generally it's hurt and it's been maintained more than necessary. Seeing a 5-3 for instance with three to four hundred thousand miles on it is just a normal day
Great video Minnesota Mike....
Incredible performance, miles ahead of the 5.3 v8
From what I've seen, it ALMOST equals the 5.3 in some respects. How is it "miles ahead"?
Has anyone done a high mileage longevity test on the 4 cylinder! Doing over 100K of very mixed driving/towing and following all of the manufacturer recommended maintenance.
206k no issues, pulls 7400lbs camper 90% of mileage.
My 2.7 is fast as hell funny as it may sound
People are concerned with reliability, but statistically, these 2.7s have made it to 100k more reliably than the 5.3s of recent years.
Provide proof random person on the internet... Just supposed to take your word?
@@bradb8055 or stop being lazy and do the research yourself to find out. Or just wait to be told what to believe.
The 2.7 with originally from the Cadillac division of General Motors. It was absolutely put through its Paces because it was sold as a performance option from one of their sedans. The stuff that was done to that motor throughout its testing was pretty ridiculous quite frankly and they really didn't have any issues. Sadly the work that it's putting it in that truck probably isn't any worse.
@bradb8055 Ive seen a odometer on a 21 2.7 that tows a 7400lbs camper sitting at 206k. Ask if there has been any issues, only thing he said was something about a brake sensor that was replaced.
Do you have a brake controller installed?
How is it a less complicated motor? The 5.3 is something you never have to worry about. The turbos are alot of system to worry about. Just like my dad ford. It's nice and easy to tow with a turbo engine but there are more parts to have to fix. Cooler lines mainly. And if he had the 5.0 he would get the same mileage and prolly tow just the same.
You know how many 5.3s and 6.2s have shit lifters and needed an motor before the first oil change? Oh yeah ain’t gotta worry about anything but putting a motor in it 🤣
@@freedomisntfree_44 the lifters failed because people would use conventional oil rather than synthetic like the GM engineers specifically stated in the manual. The oil valleys leading to the lifters 100% will clog if synthetic is not used or the oil is not changed within maintenance cycles, the lifters are actually fairly good as long as they are oiled properly. AFM also played a part in the valleys getting clogged, It was a terrible design in the end but the AFM can be turned off in 3 minutes with a tuner and it becomes a very solid engine. My AFM 5.3 is running like a clock at 221k miles.
@@motarted1735 literally dozens and dozens of videos of them gm failing before the first oil change 🤣 junk,5.3 or 6.2 all junk.
@@freedomisntfree_44 Yes, it's the only way GM can keep the same design while meeting gov mandates, AFM can be deleted electronically and all problems resolved. The LS was literally designed by racecar engine builders so ease of access to fix this shit is stupid simple. The LS platform is super simple and cheap to fix. I can have the engine out of the truck and stripped down in less than 8 hours.
@@motarted1735 the delete isn’t fixing them 🤣 they still coming in left and right. Lawsuits are out about it even…gm is junk
What was the total weight of the trailer?
Do you know if it requires premium gas to make full power or it is tuned to get all that torque with standard gas?
Full power on 87 octane
I have the 2021 Sierra with the same motor(2.7) and I use the premium (93 octane) I drive alot and I see it last longer than reg 87 octane and I feel it has full power with the 93 octane
But everyone has different driving habits so things can be different
I’ve towed a big bbq grill and have had no issues it feels like I’m not towing anything
Aside from that I’ve switched over to the royal purple full synthetic oil bc I work my truck 10-12 hrs a day and I also feel that the truck performs better than when i was using Mobil full synthetic
This truck engine is practical for the handyman/plumber/gardener/carwash detailing business/ or any other business model that doesn’t really need the full power of a V8 engine but can still benefit from the vehicle tax deduction and the use that a truck gives for multiple types of jobs that one would do around town
Highway is where this engine shines I get about 35mpg with city at 18-19mpg
At the end of the day should a person run the engine to the ground and get to the point where they must replace the engine they can always opt to get the 5.3 or 6.2 engine instead of another 4cyl
Amazingly.... Its built around 87. Wonder if they can squeeze out more power with 91 and a tune
These need to last 200k miles for me to be 100% interested.
I dont know anything about this 4 banger, is it almost like half a v8.? Whats the cylinder bore is it smaller.? They would a PIA to own and maintain especially with real high mileage
Wait till you need to change something like the timing belt and you have to separate the transmission from the motor because timing belt is the back,5.3 timing belt in front, nice motor but servicing when higher km is way more difficult than 5.3.
Timing chain, not a belt. Likely to never have to change it. Also, it's on the front.
The engine is not less complicated
Nice video
I been driving a 5.3 and the worst thing about them is 3.23 axle ratio.not meant to tow anything. Absolute crap milage when you evenpull a 1000 lb trailer.
The 3.43 axle is a much better and typical choice
3.23, ya thats high range gear. Good for unloaded just traveling but towing would be hit hard im sure.
Are the brakes hydro boost or vacuum assist? Thanks
Neither, the brakes are electric assist.
@@mikeh3558 I should have known, thanks Mike H
Let’s get this straight-you’re towing a load that’s heavier than the tow vehicle and you’re worried about braking? That’s what you should NOT be worried about if the trailer has a proper braking system. Forget acceleration unless you’re drag racing.
Brakes are huge on the new trucks. That's only 8k or around. Stops 10k no problem.
2019 Gmc sierra 2.7 turbo or 5.3 wich one to buy??
Or you can just turn on your emergency flashers and parking lights to see if your parking, turn signals and brake lights work. Don't need a five thousand dollar computer for that.
What worries me is how hard they are trying to sell this engine if it was as good as they say they wouldn’t need to pump it so much
They're trying hard because there's this misconception from the small peen crowd that a 4 cylinder shouldn't be in a full size truck.
@@Jisstifer83626 I finally got to hear one a few days ago on the road I hope that you don’t have to hear it inside the truck it’s not a good sound that 4 cylinder noise and the turbo whining noise it definitely needs a card in it’s spokes and not a exhaust system to make that engine sound louder I want to see some higher mileage reviews not just a new truck review and I don’t see very many of them for any vehicle
NICE!🇨🇦
I guess gym wants to sell 2 trucks with 4 cylinders as to one with v 8 not much difference in gas miles?
It's the government causing this. And it's not just GM. If you paid attention, you'd realize it.
You're either misinformed or lying, which doesn't surprise me considering you're a dealer. The 5.3 makes 45 MORE horsepower, 35 MORE ft/lbs of torque(for 2021) and to top it all off the V8 actually gets slightly better fuel economy. I would also like to mention the pushrod design of the 5.3 is nearly a century old, it is literally one of the most simple designs of any other motor on the market right now, turbos adds much more complexity as the bearings and blades will eventually wear down to the point of rebuilding or replacing the turbo. Boosting an engine will also cause much more compression in the combustion chamber, leading to blown head gaskets at shorter intervals. Did I mention the added compression in the combustion requires higher octane fuel to prevent knocking, sure you could use 87 but you the knock sensors will tell the ECM to pull timing, leading to a reduction in horsepower, torque, and fuel efficiency. The 5.3 is a workhorse, it was never meant to be a race engine, (although it holds the stock bottom end 1/4 mile WORLD RECORD) it will last you 300k miles at a minimum if you keep the oil clean. The 2.7 is something GM is pushing because the government is forcing them to sell however many trash emissions engines for every V8. The sad part, like I said is the 5.3 is rated by the literal EPA to have better fuel economy.
I think you should try one,you'd be surprised
The 2021 2.7 makes 430 ft lbs of torque, the 5.3 makes 383. I don't know where your numbers are from...
@@minnesotamike7132 and torque is king.Thats why the 2.7 is a winner
@@jasonbrushett2005 Forced induction torque is not remotely the same ad naturally aspirated torque.
@@elonmust7470 no it's better
2800 rpm at 67mph. Interesting...
My V8 Nissan Titan runs 1700 rpm at 70mph….
That motor is going to be a headache once it hits 100,000. Maintenance on a v8 is easier then a turbo charged engine.
Yes people do have a hard time understanding turbo motors, but for those that do it is not a big deal.
@@Steven-xj2rf I mean I can choose to work on a ultra complex turbo motor that sounds like a suped up Honda or just stick with the tried and true, easy to work on v8s hmmm which one to pick
@@adamsmiths3016 "ULTRA COMPLEX". That is funny. These things are not complex. The problem is the 2.7T is superior to the POS 5.3L V8 in useable power at below 3000rpm. The 2.7T TRUMPS the 5.3L in torque made which is what you want in a truck. I prefer the better product period.
@Adam Smith’s you could also stick with tried and true easy to work on 3 speed transmissions, carburetors, 350 v8s, AM only radios, drum brakes, and a long list of other things that are going on the History Channel soon. 😀
@@mr.monitor. when your ready come talk to me again. It seems you have yet to learn the car lessons you need to.
What was the transmission temperature?
I was too excited to jump in and get going, I wasn't versed in the controls enough to pull up towing Temps until after we finished shooting the video. I believe the temp never got much over 180. If I get an opportunity to do this again, I will pull a hill with it and watch Temps. The good news is that GM rates max towing on a 15 degree incline at a minimum speed of 40mph sustained to determine capacity, this is at 100F outdoor temps.
@@minnesotamikesworld7572 awesome thank you!
It was just a matter of time till the copy Ford
No thanks. I'll keep my 2021 5.3 without afm. No sound like a v8 with borla exhaust
you lucked out, nowadays even if you buy the big boy 6.2 V8, you're running 2 cylinders most of the time due to cylinder deactivation.
@@jakes5530 yea man I did. Love it
Lifetime warranty?????? On what????
Our dealership has a lifetime warranty on every new vehicle we sell to the original owner on all internally lubricated parts, which includes the turbo.
@@minnesotamikesworld7572 that’s pretty incredible.
I'm sure all services have to be done by dealership and we all know how that works, you'll have to take there word for what's needing to be replaced and if you don't agree warranty no longer exists, and believe me they will dollar you to death
Nope, just an ASE certified mechanic. Just make sure services are recorded with carfax so they are documented.
the turbo will burn out at 60k miles; then the 5.3L will do the towing, permanently.....
Says the bobo with no experience behind one.
The 2.7 are very well built so maybe people should do research before opening up their pie hole 😂
5.3 is a garbage engine.
But I wanna be a v8 I’m trying hard to be a v8 but I’m not
The new HD 2.7's are robust. As with anything frequent oil changes and using oil that is designed to mitigate LSPI.
With the turbo motor, it consumes less fuel at idle, low speeds and since this engine is so bizarrely good at avoiding knock it has more torque, by a lot, at lower speeds.
When you're in higher elevation the turbo will be able to compensate to reach torque request, whereas NA is at a disadvantage.
V8's have gotten much more worrisome. DI, VVT. Cylinder deactivation, and 4 more cylinders that might have a failure (coils, etc)
There is nothing at all wrong with the V8's.
And actually at lowerspeeds where the intake pressure is greater than exhaust back pressure the engine has a higher pumping efficiency. When they map that with DI you can run stoich or near stoich (same as NA) so you arent dumping more fuel to accommodate the boost.
I probably get better fuel economy with my 5.7L Tundra when towing my 3500lbs camper.
There is always someone making unverifiable claims about MPG.
The 2.7T will save you more money throughout the year vs the 5.7k iforce and do everything you need it to do.
Screw GM! There is nothing wrong with the power of the 5.3.
If you need to have more turbo the 5.3!!!
It's what we all want, just blow all the other truck on the road away.
2.7... SMH...
The 5.3L is a weak V8. It doesn't make useable power or torque until you wind it out past 4000rpm and then your will be dropping lifters.
It must be that time of the month for Domnic.
You can tell he is a salesman ! A 2.7 in a full size pickup! What a joke!
Ford has had a 2.7 in their trucks for years. Their 3.5 is rated for 13,500 lbs. The Chevy 2.7 turbo feels less strained than the 5.3 in a side by side comparison. It's easy to sit back and say something is bad vs actually experiencing it. Come down to the dealership and get a seat of the pants experience.
That's more engine than most guys need
@@jasonbrushett2005 you're a city clown for sure.
@@elonmust7470 you have no idea who I am or where I live.Another stupid,uninformed comment
@@jasonbrushett2005 Sure don't. I have however been judging you by your comments... I come from a background of cattle ranching, logging, & oil & gas wells... I can see the city in people so easily.
These dealerships lying to seel these things 🤣🤣
Foolish comment,v8 is a dying breed,you'd better accept that
Crybaby gonna cry.
The Ford ecoboost engines are years a head of anything GM or Ram have!
Yeah. Tell that to all of the owners in the Broncos with that turd of a 2.7 4 Cylinder. Also, look at Fords abysmal reliability for 2022. 😆
There’s no replacement for displacement.
If I had a nickle for everything I've heard that, I'd have two nickles. But if that were the case, why do they turbocharge diesels...like all the time?
@@minnesotamike7132 Turbos Diesels are running at 2k RPM, big difference from a 2.7L 4cyl. The 302 will be the last I’ll ever need at 69 yrs old.
@@marcvivori1561 did you even look at the video?
He's cruising at 70mph and the darn thing revs around 2200rpm.
I don't think 200rpm will grenade an engine 🤣
@@ProbeGT2 Did you hear that engine getting up to speed? Old school here will take the V8. The 302 has been running for billions of miles. They can get 750hp out of it easily but I’m happy with an easy 400hp.
@@marcvivori1561 you think flooring a v8 with 8000lbs behind it won't rev 5000 rpm? Jesus Christ, stop whining on youtube and try to learn engineering a bit.
junk. That engine won't last 50,000 miles.
Haha lifetime warranty, that means Chevy knows that engine is garbage .
If that's how you determine something is garbage, there's a lot of garbage out there you'd better stay away from. Why would we put a lifetime warranty on something we weren't willing to back up?
Foolish comment
Lol right yes, a warranty or in other words, a commitment by the manufacturer that they will pay for repairs for the life of the vehicle means it’s garbage. Having a very limited or no warranty at all means the manufacturer can dash out anytime for any reason to leave you high and dry.
@Texasfan88 that's not a commitment by the manufacturer, that's a commitment by the dealership. It's also not restricted by having to be worked only only by us.
@@minnesotamike7132 True.
It does not have power or torque the 5.3 has...
Unless you look at the specs.
Keep telling yourself that. Live in denial.
Good luck 20,000 miles down the road with that 4 cylinder engine. We can check with Consumer Reports Magazine. I wouldn't trust a sales person in regard to his/her opinion. The 4 cylinder engine sounds like an old Chevrolet Vega!!!
A large (Turbo )engine new technology if you take care the truck service it will need the truck will last I believe to over 200 thousand miles or more
The 5.3 doesn’t even make the most power in its class!!!! Of course it lost to a newer turbo motor with more torque
You give a lifetime warranty? 9:50
Our dealership does, yes! Plus we are one of a few that sell new under MSRP. Right now we are selling Silverados with the 2.7 for $3500under MSRP
@@minnesotamike7132 well sir that is a hell of a deal. Wish I didn’t live way down here in GA.
Andean Chevrolet has lifetime warranty. Cumming Ga.