Charles Tart - Does Transpersonal Psychology Revamp Reality?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 сен 2016
- Transpersonal psychology is the claim that our mental well-being relates, in some sense, to nonphysical interactions of some kind. Transpersonal psychology assumes the reality of ESP, a controversial position to say the least. But can transpersonal psychology supply its own evidence through its therapies? Or do the arguments run in circles?
Click here to watch more interviews on transpersonal psychology bit.ly/2cEucAT
Click here to watch more interviews with Charles Tart bit.ly/1EdYfqd
Click here to buy episodes or complete seasons of Closer To Truth bit.ly/1LUPlQS
For all of our video interviews please visit us at www.closertotruth.com
This guy's *very* good, you can tell he's _ON_ his craft and can elucidate it to anyone. Charles must be very underrated, but I'm glad at least Closer to Truth has covered him in a number of vids thus far *
The transcendent experience is *profoundly* context sensitive. In Science it presents as 'the eureka event" and enlightenment is one's condition after such an event. It ought to be measurable; just have to catch it.
We should try a new game. We are all children, so act like it! "Let's quit playing grown up". Personal quote of the day, I'd like to share just with you
Where does Jung's corpus fall in?
Looks like Charlie's work is pretty dodgy. Just like so many so-called psychics.
"Tart has drawn criticism from the scientific community for his comments on a failed psychokinesis (PK) experiment. The targets from the random number generator that were used in the experiment were not random. Tart responded by claiming the nonrandomness was due to a PK effect. Terence Hines has written that a procedural flaw in the experiment itself was used by Tart as evidence for psi and that this is an example of the use of a nonfalsifiable hypothesis in parapsychology.[12]
In 1980, Tart claimed that a rejudging of the transcripts from one of Russell Targ and Harold Puthoff’s remote viewing experiments revealed an above-chance result.[13] Targ and Puthoff refused to provide copies of the transcripts and it was not until July 1985 that they were made available for study when it was discovered they still contained sensory cues.[14] The psychologist David Marks and Christopher Scott (1986) wrote "considering the importance for the remote viewing hypothesis of adequate cue removal, Tart’s failure to perform this basic task seems beyond comprehension. As previously concluded, remote viewing has not been demonstrated in the experiments conducted by Puthoff and Targ, only the repeated failure of the investigators to remove sensory cues."[15] Tart has also been criticized by the skeptic Robert Todd Carroll for ignoring Occam's razor (advocating the paranormal instead of naturalistic explanations) and for ignoring the known laws of physics.[16]"
However, the psi phenomena is a reality...the ideal condition is for the skeptical researcher to have his own transcendental experiences and replace mistrust by knowledge in another level or paradigm.
O god, what is it this time?