But they don't talk about the movie and the mathematician at all.. the interview gets hijacked towards Jenna's work, which, impressive though, is not something the episode's title is about!
Dr. Levin. I am not a scientist of any kind. So I apologize for my question: I would like to know, how you can "hear" the sound of two black holes colliding, given that you "see" the collision and at the same "time" your instruments are able to get a manifestation of the "sound" it makes. I wonder how you can accomplish recording those manifestations, given that the two events travel at different velocities; i.e., light and sound? The light would travel faster toward us, but the sound would lag behind.
What does black holes blew mean. The first created things were the black holes and a huge half symmetrical curves. These grew extremely fast creating separation of space time. Then they blew creating geometry of space time when two of them merge using prime numbers as the nodal points. When prime numbers merge is where events happen. So i*sin(x)*Π^x integrated from zero to infinity. Time is dynamics x.
Janna Levin (inconsistent spelling above) is great at explaining astrophysics for public consumption. It was wonderful when she went on Stephen Colbert's show, but this allowed her more depth and breadth. I first encountered her with A Madman Dreams of the Turing Machine and then heard a story she told on NPR's The Moth. She, Bill Nye, and Alan Alda have all been assets to science in the media lately. This is so impressive and we need to impress people with the long game of scientists. We need to explain the scientific endeavor to policy makers. IF movies help to popularize cosmology rather than cosmetology, so much the better. Glad computer renderings of black holes were the gift from movies to science too!
I love how you put it ... "the long game of scientists". The phenomenon of people dismissing scientific fact so easily and summarily has me quaking in my boots. I've never witnessed so much human stupidity and ignorance as I have the last 3 years. I'm binge-watching a lot of Janna and Brian Green these days ... it reminds me that we have the potential for intelligence.
@Robin Gore Just reminded to watch Jane Wagner and Lilly Tomlin's "Signs of Intelligent Life ..." Thanks for expanding my 4 walls with a visit to your channel because of connecting here! Bella bella!
It is what I admire most of Jana Levin in her descriptions of science, that gender should be completely absent from the discussion about scientists. In a hundred years time and beyond I'm sure it will be this way intuitively that we will see each other individually and no longer as a gender class. Then we truly will be ' human beings in the space age '.
Maybe in the future Bill, and for the future of the human race, we will have to get testosterone under control. It is the male of the species responsible for most of the acts of murder and violence. We don't need so many males if we do away with pair-bonding and child-rearing. Let the state look after the upkeep of children. We could just keep a few prized males and farm them for their sperm, and then the human race will reach its full potential as a matriarchal society. I could well see us going in that direction in a thousand years time.
the only reason males have been the perpetrators of violence is because they have been the ones in power (rightfully so). There is no evidence that a feminized society will be a peaceful one. As soon as margret thatcher took power she sent british troops to south america LOL. what a load of shit
1. If you are going to discuss math (themed, aspects in) movies, then why not have an actual mathematician, such as Hannah Fry or or Sarah Koch? (No disrespect to Professor Levin who I have met and respect.) 2. Most of the discussion is about astrophysics and Einstein. Great stuff to be sure, but addresses little of mathematics per se; the video title is misleading in that the discussion is not restricted to Ramanujan who is almost not discussed at all in this video. 3. Was there a first part of this interview discussion? Levin hints at an earlier part in their discussion about Number Theory.
Well done Janna ! Perfect example of hijacking the main topic of the conversation which was Ramanujam to your own subject and self promotion. I think it would have been perfectly OK to admit that you don’t know much about Ramanujam’s work. Of course no one expects you to know everything. Also a good interviewer could have asked Janna to focus on the main topic but Alas !
Click bait on Ramanujan. Great episode but unrelated to the subject. They brought her in and maybe realized she had no competency to talk about Ramanujan’s work
Well I don't think they knew that either. What ever you hear on the cutting edge of theoretical physics and astronomy - needs to be taken with a good dose of healthy scepticism. These so-called facts need another 50 to 100 years of science to get sorted out.
lol, what a lifetime i've had, "i remember when black holes were science fiction" they were when i was a kid, but i don't remember the transition from sci-fi to everyday acceptance. in fact it's odd because what was clearly once upon a time sci-fi eased it's way into reality, like a book coming to life. turning any waveform into any sound isn't that impressive, not to say that the "chirp" isn't the most amazing thing.
After we're born, we accumulate memory association techniques and practices dependent at the same time on a faith, hope, belief and trust in empirical laws of evidence plus the hypothetical wisdom of more advanced thinkers and Teachers, ie we combine intuition and theory about a future based in the past according to an individual functional principle in integration of Information processing. That's Biological, and in general context of Human expectations, Philosophical, so although the Universe is all Superspin e-Pi-i circuitry/circulating, the ordinary perceptions of individuals is of "must have a beginning", intuitively, in the Big Picture. Quantized perceptions in pictures of functioning situations leads to the philosophical analysis of qualities in symbolic quantization representations of language and mathematics in "judgmental sentencing" of rational and reasonable statements of mathematical reciprocal positioning formulae manifestation of quantization probabilities in potential possibilities. Math-Phys-Chem and Geometry in rational and reasonable statements of theoretical relationships.. As loci of Quantum Chemistry In-form-ation formulae of superimposed resonances of e-Pi-i, ie not clones of human objects, we are each approximately the same individuation of phase-locked coherent cohesion objectivity in pulsed resonances of e-Pi-i continuous connectivity , reiterativly/recirculating "memory association". A "black hole singularity" is a whole lot of probabilities in a particular positioning, that is massive because that is what mass and circular momentum does.., subject to mathematical calculation analysis. "In Tuition", is the perception of ongoing "what and how" Students learn by Physical-Mathematical Teaching-learning experiences, summed up in the now-moment. Theoretically, it's legitimate teaching technique to present the universal big picture situation as a Big Bang, but the Black Hole Singularity Conception is a "cancellation by symmetry" in Perspective scaling objectives in the now-moment, Central Limit Eternity-now Superspin Superposition-point Singularity positioning of/by cause-effect computational time duration timing modulation. AM-FM of time duration timing communication-connection alignment, with Primary Probability here-now-forever existence in pulsed resonances of e-Pi-i interference positioning, is us, leaves on the tree, and all other spin integration structure in Principle perspective.., Universe. Black Hole collisions are just a bit of Celestial Chemistry In-form-ation of QM-TIMESPACE.
Astounding, sir! Never before have I seen so many words used in a salad just to form absolute no coherent thouts whatsoever. You're dumber for having written it, and I for having read it. You should feel bad.
But they don't talk about the movie and the mathematician at all.. the interview gets hijacked towards Jenna's work, which, impressive though, is not something the episode's title is about!
Of curse! Ramanujan genius is used as a shield to talk about that thief , Einstein . Einstein who stole that formula from Henri Poincare .
@@mariusvladu2041 What formula? General Relativity ?
This conversation has nothing whatsoever to do with Ramanujan or the recent movie about him.
They hardly spoke about Ramanujan or the movie!!! Hello...
Dr. Levin. I am not a scientist of any kind. So I apologize for my question: I would like to know, how you can "hear" the sound of two black holes colliding, given that you "see" the collision and at the same "time" your instruments are able to get a manifestation of the "sound" it makes. I wonder how you can accomplish recording those manifestations, given that the two events travel at different velocities; i.e., light and sound?
The light would travel faster toward us, but the sound would lag behind.
What does black holes blew mean. The first created things were the black holes and a huge half symmetrical curves. These grew extremely fast creating separation of space time. Then they blew creating geometry of space time when two of them merge using prime numbers as the nodal points. When prime numbers merge is where events happen. So i*sin(x)*Π^x integrated from zero to infinity. Time is dynamics x.
Janna Levin (inconsistent spelling above) is great at explaining astrophysics for public consumption. It was wonderful when she went on Stephen Colbert's show, but this allowed her more depth and breadth. I first encountered her with A Madman Dreams of the Turing Machine and then heard a story she told on NPR's The Moth. She, Bill Nye, and Alan Alda have all been assets to science in the media lately. This is so impressive and we need to impress people with the long game of scientists. We need to explain the scientific endeavor to policy makers. IF movies help to popularize cosmology rather than cosmetology, so much the better. Glad computer renderings of black holes were the gift from movies to science too!
I love how you put it ... "the long game of scientists". The phenomenon of people dismissing scientific fact so easily and summarily has me quaking in my boots. I've never witnessed so much human stupidity and ignorance as I have the last 3 years. I'm binge-watching a lot of Janna and Brian Green these days ... it reminds me that we have the potential for intelligence.
@Robin Gore Just reminded to watch Jane Wagner and Lilly Tomlin's "Signs of Intelligent Life ..." Thanks for expanding my 4 walls with a visit to your channel because of connecting here! Bella bella!
It is what I admire most of Jana Levin in her descriptions of science, that gender should be completely absent from the discussion about scientists. In a hundred years time and beyond I'm sure it will be this way intuitively that we will see each other individually and no longer as a gender class. Then we truly will be ' human beings in the space age '.
there will always be people looking for ways to victimize groups based on disparities in outcome
Maybe in the future Bill, and for the future of the human race, we will have to get testosterone under control. It is the male of the species responsible for most of the acts of murder and violence. We don't need so many males if we do away with pair-bonding and child-rearing. Let the state look after the upkeep of children. We could just keep a few prized males and farm them for their sperm, and then the human race will reach its full potential as a matriarchal society. I could well see us going in that direction in a thousand years time.
that is absolutely retarded brainwashed male hatred
the only reason males have been the perpetrators of violence is because they have been the ones in power (rightfully so). There is no evidence that a feminized society will be a peaceful one. As soon as margret thatcher took power she sent british troops to south america LOL. what a load of shit
Oh at first thought it may appear so, but I think, given time, it may be a good course to follow for our future survival.
1. If you are going to discuss math (themed, aspects in) movies, then why not have an actual mathematician, such as Hannah Fry or or Sarah Koch? (No disrespect to Professor Levin who I have met and respect.)
2. Most of the discussion is about astrophysics and Einstein. Great stuff to be sure, but addresses little of mathematics per se; the video title is misleading in that the discussion is not restricted to Ramanujan who is almost not discussed at all in this video.
3. Was there a first part of this interview discussion? Levin hints at an earlier part in their discussion about Number Theory.
I love her
Well done Janna ! Perfect example of hijacking the main topic of the conversation which was Ramanujam to your own subject and self promotion. I think it would have been perfectly OK to admit that you don’t know much about Ramanujam’s work. Of course no one expects you to know everything. Also a good interviewer could have asked Janna to focus on the main topic but Alas !
Click bait on Ramanujan. Great episode but unrelated to the subject. They brought her in and maybe realized she had no competency to talk about Ramanujan’s work
Discussion should be about the title or title should be about discussion. Discussion is far far away from Title. Please, correct.
When things are pushed in the range of speed of light you see them dark. Black holes blue.
At least now people can solve some of the mystery of the world.
I NEVER REALIZED JANA WAS SO PRETTY.....I MUST HAVE BEEN IN LOVE WITH HER BRAIN
Wow ok so there is no actual matter in a black hole, it's empty space. I didn't know that.
Well I don't think they knew that either. What ever you hear on the cutting edge of theoretical physics and astronomy - needs to be taken with a good dose of healthy scepticism. These so-called facts need another 50 to 100 years of science to get sorted out.
Janna Levin is the perfection: so smart and brillant, very attractive, I 'm in love with her!
i love smart women both of them are great.
lol, what a lifetime i've had, "i remember when black holes were science fiction" they were when i was a kid, but i don't remember the transition from sci-fi to everyday acceptance. in fact it's odd because what was clearly once upon a time sci-fi eased it's way into reality, like a book coming to life. turning any waveform into any sound isn't that impressive, not to say that the "chirp" isn't the most amazing thing.
Jan 11 is the day when Cosmology and human sexuality merged.💥
Janna’s such a fox😋😈🤓
Digressing from the main topic at its best....
Yes, interesting conversation But a let down. 👎👎👎
After we're born, we accumulate memory association techniques and practices dependent at the same time on a faith, hope, belief and trust in empirical laws of evidence plus the hypothetical wisdom of more advanced thinkers and Teachers, ie we combine intuition and theory about a future based in the past according to an individual functional principle in integration of Information processing. That's Biological, and in general context of Human expectations, Philosophical, so although the Universe is all Superspin e-Pi-i circuitry/circulating, the ordinary perceptions of individuals is of "must have a beginning", intuitively, in the Big Picture.
Quantized perceptions in pictures of functioning situations leads to the philosophical analysis of qualities in symbolic quantization representations of language and mathematics in "judgmental sentencing" of rational and reasonable statements of mathematical reciprocal positioning formulae manifestation of quantization probabilities in potential possibilities. Math-Phys-Chem and Geometry in rational and reasonable statements of theoretical relationships..
As loci of Quantum Chemistry In-form-ation formulae of superimposed resonances of e-Pi-i, ie not clones of human objects, we are each approximately the same individuation of phase-locked coherent cohesion objectivity in pulsed resonances of e-Pi-i continuous connectivity , reiterativly/recirculating "memory association".
A "black hole singularity" is a whole lot of probabilities in a particular positioning, that is massive because that is what mass and circular momentum does.., subject to mathematical calculation analysis.
"In Tuition", is the perception of ongoing "what and how" Students learn by Physical-Mathematical Teaching-learning experiences, summed up in the now-moment. Theoretically, it's legitimate teaching technique to present the universal big picture situation as a Big Bang, but the Black Hole Singularity Conception is a "cancellation by symmetry" in Perspective scaling objectives in the now-moment, Central Limit Eternity-now Superspin Superposition-point Singularity positioning of/by cause-effect computational time duration timing modulation.
AM-FM of time duration timing communication-connection alignment, with Primary Probability here-now-forever existence in pulsed resonances of e-Pi-i interference positioning, is us, leaves on the tree, and all other spin integration structure in Principle perspective.., Universe.
Black Hole collisions are just a bit of Celestial Chemistry In-form-ation of QM-TIMESPACE.
Astounding, sir!
Never before have I seen so many words used in a salad just to form absolute no coherent thouts whatsoever.
You're dumber for having written it, and I for having read it. You should feel bad.
I stopped watching when of course they had to say "& there are a lot of accomplished female mathematicians too"