whats wrong with admiring artists? Without art and beauty there would not be a life worth living. Einstein once said “Life without playing music is inconceivable for me.” “I live my daydreams in music, I see my life in terms of music.” “If I were not a physicist I would probably be a musician.”
@@al23438 There's nothing wrong with how people admire artist. It's just people can't admire scientist as what they deserve, the knowledge they've been paving is immeasurable. If people admired scientists like how they admire artists, more and more people will have the desire to be a part in the search and development of knowledge.. and that's what matters.
Conversely, if humanity highly valued scientists and under valued artists, the world would be a horribly boring place. But yes, science is currently undervalued.
So being complete imbecile that doesn't understand shit but takes a job as interviewer for one of most intelligent people? That's how more people should be like?
Right she is so lucky to talk to brian greene but u know universe can and will come from nothing there is no need of creater but its ur believe if u want to believe in god btw i think u intrested im space
@@jjthomsan4111 I think God is actually the little filament found in quarks ( according to string theory ) who creates vibration that created our Universe 😅 think about God in this way
but before string theory some belive that this is god but now u believe god is in string theory suppose for sake of talk if there is god then who created the god then who created this god this all will go in infint regresion unfortunately 😅we all give our own meaning to life there is no meaning of life we all are here by chance and now we are homo sapnience
I don not know if she is "actually" a movie reporter/critique or not, but by the way she asked questions she does know the subject pretty well. She is not pretentious and genuinely curious to know more about the subject of space & time. Impressive if she is really just a movie critique. Smart lady!
@@johnnastrom9400 even if the questions are anticipated. To be able to ask a valid and sensible follow up questions, she should know something about the topic. There's a video of a woman interviewing Neil Tyson which is extremely painful to watch unlike this one.
confused, and she has a creepy smile on her face, like it’s not natural. Like she is a robot who’s eyes doesn’t correspond with the mouth while smiling.......... if what I said was understandable 😜
But galelio had already proven his first theorem,so basically newton made the idea more presentable as he had an equation,to me galelio newton and einstein are epic as they had to change the entire idea of how people look at the world
Mohammad Hamid If you want to see a dummy look in the mirror. When did he say you can change the future? What he’s saying is time runs slower next to a black hole than it does on earth. So every 10 years on earth might be just 1 year next to a black hole. Therefore if you park next to a black hole for 10 years, by the time you go back to earth, 100 years will have gone by. How is that changing the future?
DEFINITELY!! It was easy to understand (unlike the sucky PBS Ausi guy who looks like Peter Dinklage Who obviously thinks he's lecturing high-level PhD students instead of RUclips laymen ) AND entertaining!!
@Mohammad Hamid A day is like a thousand yrs and a thousand yrs is like a day is from the bible….but I think you got it mixed up. Traveling close to light speed or near a black hole slows the traveler’s time down. Time on earth remains constant.
I think the multiverse is created by each person on earth, I’m a multiverse, your a multiverse, personally I think the universe is the Gods mind. To have it make sense what ant man and the wasp, then watch the avengers endgame.
I love that she's genuinely interested in the subject. It really shows through in the great questions she's asking and the spontaneous-ness of the interview. Great job!
He’s my second favorite current day scientist, a very close second to Brian Cox. They both have the ability to make the most complex theories and ideas sound like child’s play to us mere mortals. Love them both!
@@nadeemshaikh7863 I totally agree. She is an actress. Brian is a physicist but could be a good actor. It looks so obvious that he prepared all of the questions.
The video was scripted and rehearsed to cover the topic fluidly. Very well done to look spontaneous. I Loved the final product. Bravo! P.S. I still don't really have a good grasp of space-time , gravity, reality, or .....?
Faith does a great job here asking questions. I know I am four years late to this but I really hope she has found success. This cannot have been an easy interview and she deserves credit for doing it so well.
Thank you Faith for your humble reporting, giving more recognition to the interviewee than yourself while at the same time addressing the thoughts and doubts of the general public while maintaining professionalism and humor. It takes a wise reporter to convey a story worthy of attention to those who may not understand its importance.
@@sagarsolanki7514 yeah, it freaks me out. If time and space are mingled into one, so every dot has a specific time and space, but waht if yo stay somewhere? That means your space is the same but time is passing, it's so nogiin slapping
Great to see the interviewer knows the questions to ask and how to ask them. And the way Brian Green at 15:10 deals with the question of belief is just awesome. Love watching to smart people having a discussion.
Fantastic interviewer! She asked scripted questions but immediately requested clarification of anything she didnt quite get, never wasting time with self deprecation or low brow jokes. And she stayed energetic and cheery throughout. So rare in these pop science interviews. Great job!
Brian Greene is a truly unique human being. How fortunate for humanity to have such a mind seving us. I am personally a christian and I'm not sure about what mr Greene would think about aspects of my experience of existence. Though he does invoke a spiritual and intellectual admiration. Brian Green's dedication to string theory and contributing to a unified theory is humbling and awe inspiring. Not to mention conveying complex physical consepts to the mainstream.
This was the best interview I've EVER seen between a physicist and non-physicist. Huge credit to the interviewer for asking all the right questions, understanding the answers, not repeating questions, and asking great logical follow up questions. It takes a lot of smarts to be able to do that.
Brian is the most charismatic entertaining, articulate and interesting scientist I have ever heard speak. Most scientists are very boring and they don't explain things in a charismatic, entertaining fashion. But Brian always delivers!
im glad teenagers (at least my friends and i) are ultra interested and we influence others to get interested in this and we talk about physics and math more than movies or tv shows, and honestly i think one must naturally adapt to develop an interest in this fascinating subject.
Great interview on the part of both participants. Brian Greene has such an engaging way of explaining very complex phenomena that he is a joy to listen to.
This is such an amazing interview. The host is so candid and honest with her reactions and questions, while Brian doing a brilliant job enunciating his ideas with such finesse. Enjoyed every second of it.
The lady hosting the event is Faith Salie. Although she is a journalist by profession, she is a graduate from Harvard and Oxford universities besides being a Rhodes scholar. It shows in the way she asks the questions.
Min 19:00 and min 23:00 mad o🤯🤯 btw does anyone else notice the chemistry between both of them? They look like they could go on for the next two hours, absolutely enjoying each other's company
I really enjoyed the question she asked also Brain's answer on Newton and Einstein. To me in order 1 Newton 2 Eisenstein and 3 Richard Feynman. I wish Brain would give up the String Theory because I don't think it will ever unify General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics because of there is no concise understanding of gravity on Quantum Physics, I think.
She actually listens. Then ask appropriately intelligent questions. He responds in the layman's term possible. She follows up and give feedback. He expounds, validates and clarifies her observations. She verbalized her understanding at which point they move on to the next topic. This is the the unified theory of good conversation.
I wonder how many lives I've inadvertently taken, or saved through the butterfly effect.. Stopping at a junction to allow a car to pass, that type of thing..
The Butterfly effect is always in effect. Try to picture this: You want to meet with a friend of yours. In the last minute your friend tells you over the telephone that the meeting is canceled. Now you stay at home for lunch, instead going out and eat somewhere on the fly. And because you eat at home, instead somewhere else, you use up your food a tiny bit faster as you would have otherwise. As a result you go shopping on monday morning, instead maybe on monday noon. And because you go in the morning you encounter different people in the supermarket. In the casshier line you have a lot more people as if you would have had on noon, so you wait longer there and maybe hold of some other guy for 5 minutes. That other guy now hits the road 5 minutes later and influences the traffic for someone else in a complete different way. You could spin this into endless outcomes, until you realize: You always change the whole of everything no matter what you do. If you sit silently in a cave for 30 years you effect the world just as much as if you would travel from place to place.
great great host. She asks the questions we have because she understands the question enough to ask the correct question of someone not in understanding the some way someone not understanding would ask it, if they understood… very nice
Prof.Brian Green is an excellent communicator on these themes about the cosmos, I find his talks clearer than some of the other pundits and their big egos
What is Time? 1. Assume the three dimensional Universe is inside a three dimensional photo Frame. Everything in this universe is dynamic and changing in relative to other things and itself. Entropy is changing also. 2. The whole Universe inside the frame marked as Now Moment is separated from previous Now Moment by shortest possible separator Plunk-time. 3. Last Now Moments are Record, History, Memory or Information. Next Now Moments are next changed states of the Universe inside Frame. 4. Only Now Moment Exist. Past and Future do not exist. 5. Conscious Mind can make predictions of next Moments from experience and can plan events for next Moments. 6. Every Plunk-Volume’s “Now” of the Universe including space and stuffs in it is always in the same Now Moment Frame of the Universe. Relative Clock ticking, fast or slow, at different points for different conditions does not shift anything to previous or next Moment Frames of the Universe. All points Now remain in the Now Moment Frame of the Universe. That is why twins of paradox can meet at any ones Now though relatively they are backward or forward in respect of amount of time elapsed. Time travel is not possible. Our invented Clocks and Calendars are misleading us about time 7. Moment is repeating at Plunk-Time separation, even if nothing is changing, something is changing or all things are changing in the Universe. Flow of Time forward or backward does not exist. No arrow of time. It is arrow of Change. Only Moment is ticking repeatedly at Plunk-Time interval with a 3D-Photo of the Universe. Many clocks are under one Universal clock. Some clocks ticking different than universal clock. Reference frames and Clocks are there at every Plunk-Volume’s.
Md. Fazlul Karim Completely agree to that. It’s exactly what I had in mind. There is one way to travel to the future, it’s going somewhere where effects on our metabolism is slower. We would age slower, then going back to the original place, we would be younger that we should have been, like we traveled in time. Our meat and milk in the fridge is traveling time, because submitted to different conditions, by the metabolism being slowed down. Travel to the past as an observer means going faster than light. We’re already seeing everything from the past. I mean, when we see something, it means it happened a fraction ago, time for light which bounced on that object to reach our eyes and information being processed by our brain. It seems simultaneous because light travel fast, but it’s physically not. When observing a far distanced object, like a faraway star, we see the light bouncing at it minutes, hours or even years ago. So if we can travel faster than light, go to a faraway place and observe earth, we would see earth at the point it was minutes, hours ou years before we left it, feeling we traveled back in time. But it can be only as an observer, of that light. Am I missing something ?
Gone time has been spent.. yet to come time isn't here yet. We ought to focus on 'moving forward' in the present (time on hand). And only God knows best.
actually, time travel appeared earlier in the Quran, on the story about Seven Sleepers (People of the Cave') in which a group of youths who hid inside a cave outside the city of Ephesus around 250 AD to escape a religious persecution and emerged some 300 years later.
Came here after watching the netflix show dark. This is one of the most fascinating conversations I’ve ever heard 🤯. The “chronology projection conjecture” is like the whole plot of the show.
![Twenty One Pilots - The Line (from Arcane Season 2) [Official Audio]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/XCz7WUotXs8/mqdefault.jpg)
The day children start admiring scientists like they admire actors and artists, humanity wil take a big leap
That day is not so far, unless Humanity goes extinct before it.
whats wrong with admiring artists? Without art and beauty there would not be a life worth living. Einstein once said “Life without playing music is inconceivable for me.” “I live my daydreams in music, I see my life in terms of music.” “If I were not a physicist I would probably be a musician.”
@@al23438 There's nothing wrong with how people admire artist. It's just people can't admire scientist as what they deserve, the knowledge they've been paving is immeasurable. If people admired scientists like how they admire artists, more and more people will have the desire to be a part in the search and development of knowledge.. and that's what matters.
@@al23438 You got it all wrong....
Conversely, if humanity highly valued scientists and under valued artists, the world would be a horribly boring place.
But yes, science is currently undervalued.
Credits to the interviewer for asking such brilliant questions on behalf of us.
Both guyss
Smart woman ❤️
I want to see her interviewing Elon Musk
yea she was awesome
She is great
“What does epistemic mean?” I love that she asked that. More people need to be like her.
100% agreed.
Yeah, i''ve been using English all my life and once a while still come across new words.
So being complete imbecile that doesn't understand shit but takes a job as interviewer for one of most intelligent people? That's how more people should be like?
Epistemic. rather, epistemology, means basically the study of "how we come to know things".
Lol yes. She asked the questions everyone else was wondering
She actually asked questions like a curious child who want to learn about Universe 😅😅😅😉and prof. answered properly like a teacher 😂
Yeah but this question are soo simple in my openion universe is way more than we think many mysteres to unreviel specially in quantum physics #athiest
@@jjthomsan4111 yeah you are right but think she never got a teacher who can tell about physics with such beauty (and I am not atheist)
Right she is so lucky to talk to brian greene but u know universe can and will come from nothing there is no need of creater but its ur believe if u want to believe in god btw i think u intrested im space
@@jjthomsan4111 I think God is actually the little filament found in quarks ( according to string theory ) who creates vibration that created our Universe 😅 think about God in this way
but before string theory some belive that this is god but now u believe god is in string theory suppose for sake of talk if there is god then who created the god then who created this god this all will go in infint regresion unfortunately 😅we all give our own meaning to life there is no meaning of life we all are here by chance and now we are homo sapnience
She should have her own podcast where she talks to scientists.
She was on two episodes of DS9, Statistical Probabilities and Chrysalis. She played Sarina Douglas.
The "Faith Salie Experience"
Not all scientists talk like him. That also.
@@innosanto true
Fastest 26 mins of my life
Brian makes science so amazing.
Were you trying to travel in time?
Haha I watched at 2x
+ she's hot. Those faces she knows she's pulling. Surprised she didn't slide off her seat.
They drilled after the interview.
Brian is always the best ever
Time is relative🤷🏻♂️🙈
"And this kids, is EXACTLY how an interview should be done"
To bad the news media doesn't have this woman's professionalism today
Lose
agree.
Johnny_Five_1999 sardax
Disagree.
I don not know if she is "actually" a movie reporter/critique or not, but by the way she asked questions she does know the subject pretty well. She is not pretentious and genuinely curious to know more about the subject of space & time. Impressive if she is really just a movie critique. Smart lady!
"Smart lady!" No. Someone prepared the questions for here. She was used as eye-candy.
That's why it is very important to have someone knowledgeable in the field that related to the subject of the discussion.
I was also thinking about the same thing too. Her questions are way beyond just a movie critique I would say. I love her line of questioning.
@@johnnastrom9400 even if the questions are anticipated. To be able to ask a valid and sensible follow up questions, she should know something about the topic.
There's a video of a woman interviewing Neil Tyson which is extremely painful to watch unlike this one.
confused, and she has a creepy smile on her face, like it’s not natural. Like she is a robot who’s eyes doesn’t correspond with the mouth while smiling.......... if what I said was understandable 😜
One of the best Science interviews ever. She is as curious as a child and that brings so much authenticity to the conversation.
I love the way he revealed Newton,s intelligence.
Me too👍
Newton and Einstein were gods
But galelio had already proven his first theorem,so basically newton made the idea more presentable as he had an equation,to me galelio newton and einstein are epic as they had to change the entire idea of how people look at the world
@maxwellsequation4887 - no, not at all! They were humans who were more developed, for their time. But not Gods AT ALL!
Great interview. She asked a lot of good followup questions!
Mohammad Hamid If you want to see a dummy look in the mirror. When did he say you can change the future?
What he’s saying is time runs slower next to a black hole than it does on earth. So every 10 years on earth might be just 1 year next to a black hole. Therefore if you park next to a black hole for 10 years, by the time you go back to earth, 100 years will have gone by. How is that changing the future?
Mohammad Hamid I think you should delete your post above as soon as possible before anyone else sees it to save you embarrassment - hurry!
@@darkmatter6714 I believe Mohammad has just discovered a whole new system of logic. What a guy!!
DEFINITELY!! It was easy to understand (unlike the sucky PBS Ausi guy who looks like Peter Dinklage Who obviously thinks he's lecturing high-level PhD students instead of RUclips laymen ) AND entertaining!!
@Mohammad Hamid
A day is like a thousand yrs and a thousand yrs is like a day is from the bible….but I think you got it mixed up. Traveling close to light speed or near a black hole slows the traveler’s time down. Time on earth remains constant.
never seen another interviewer as good as her interviewing Brian, she was deeply engaging in the conversation with great insightful questions.
"What about the multiverse?" I love her so much 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Gaaay
@@felipepineda1585 you wish lol
@@KastroCake k
I think the multiverse is created by each person on earth, I’m a multiverse, your a multiverse, personally I think the universe is the Gods mind. To have it make sense what ant man and the wasp, then watch the avengers endgame.
@@heartofthunder1440 true-
I love that she's genuinely interested in the subject. It really shows through in the great questions she's asking and the spontaneous-ness of the interview. Great job!
I can tell she has read a bit about Science, he does explain well her questions.
He’s my second favorite current day scientist, a very close second to Brian Cox.
They both have the ability to make the most complex theories and ideas sound like child’s play to us mere mortals.
Love them both!
Not to forget Neil deGrasse Tyson and Michio Kaku
@@ksprateek7816haha, lol.
She did really well in this interview. Awesome logical, well timed questions.
Obviously, they designed the questions prior, instead of coming up instantaneously.
She act bit too much of being mindblowned , but good questions.
@@nadeemshaikh7863 I totally agree. She is an actress. Brian is a physicist but could be a good actor. It looks so obvious that he prepared all of the questions.
Haha he is so amazed that he finally found a decent interviewer. I bet he wasn't expecting this.
Fantastic questions. She genuinely tries to pursue good follow up questions that lead the conversation into a more profound direction. Good job!
AMchou
That man on your profile picture is an absoloute beast.
@Joe Chang You need better language to explain your words. I couldn't understand what you wished to tell
The video was scripted and rehearsed to cover the topic fluidly. Very well done to look spontaneous. I Loved the final product.
Bravo!
P.S. I still don't really have a good grasp of space-time , gravity, reality, or .....?
She is quite the conversationalist
AMchou Hala Madrid!
Brian is brilliant ❤
Loved the interviewer, she was asking all the same questions I had in my head.
The host is enthusiastic and asks a lot of good questions.
Faith is just so lovably fantastic ! And Brian what can I say about you. You are my hero. I can listen to you whole day !
Faith does a great job here asking questions. I know I am four years late to this but I really hope she has found success. This cannot have been an easy interview and she deserves credit for doing it so well.
Thank you Faith for your humble reporting, giving more recognition to the interviewee than yourself while at the same time addressing the thoughts and doubts of the general public while maintaining professionalism and humor. It takes a wise reporter to convey a story worthy of attention to those who may not understand its importance.
what a marvelous interview!! loved this brain food
Don't forget, if you time travel you must also distance travel. otherwise you'll pop up in an unoccupied place in space were the Earth used to be.
That's almost never accounted for on TV or in film. I would like to know what show actually addresses this issue, because I can't think of any.
that's a good one
'
time is also there if there is no motion to ..... that's the weird nature of time ..
@@sagarsolanki7514 yeah, it freaks me out. If time and space are mingled into one, so every dot has a specific time and space, but waht if yo stay somewhere? That means your space is the same but time is passing, it's so nogiin slapping
Very interesting point, hadnt thought about that
The way she asked questions and taking interest is awesome 😊
25:33 The most romantic thing I ever heard from a Show host...
Haha...
@@StellaLovesMusic25 i wish we stuck in a close (sloset(?)) time like curve, so i can talk to you forever
Hahahahahahahaha She's In Loved. Hahahahaha
She's cute
@@StellaLovesMusic25 women cant lead very well
Her questions were so spot on and perfect, what a fantastic interviewer oh my goodness.
Great to see the interviewer knows the questions to ask and how to ask them. And the way Brian Green at 15:10 deals with the question of belief is just awesome. Love watching to smart people having a discussion.
"My beliefs are shaped by experiments in Mathematics" - Prof. Brian Greene. Awesomely True !
The thing I love about Brian is that he always speaks on the subject with a lot of passion.
Fantastic interviewer! She asked scripted questions but immediately requested clarification of anything she didnt quite get, never wasting time with self deprecation or low brow jokes. And she stayed energetic and cheery throughout. So rare in these pop science interviews. Great job!
I love the fact she asked 'what does epistemic mean'. Very humble lady, and Brian explains it without any arrogance.
Imagine owning a mind smarter and more creative than billions of people ahead of you for centuries.
Listening to Brian, Neil Degrasse Tyson and Lawrence Krauss always gives me goosebumps. Love these guys!
Same, Professor Brian Cox gives me goosebumps too.
@@coolbeans4881 Oh ye forgot about Brian Mr silky voice Cox. He's another guy who is great to listen too and he's a Brit like me
Give Michiu Kaku a chance if you don’t know him, he’s also an outstanding physicist/scientist.
You forgot to mention Carl Sagan the legend of all-time
She's one smart cookie, the whole dialogue was quite interesting! Haven't seen that much smart (lady) interviewers, big thumbs up for this lady!
Amanda 😂😂😂😂
@@Amanda-dg9zj I agree. But why tho ?
One of my absolute favorite scientists and educators. He has such command of his expertise and explains them in such efficient, clear ways.
Brian Greene is a truly unique human being. How fortunate for humanity to have such a mind seving us. I am personally a christian and I'm not sure about what mr Greene would think about aspects of my experience of existence. Though he does invoke a spiritual and intellectual admiration. Brian Green's dedication to string theory and contributing to a unified theory is humbling and awe inspiring. Not to mention conveying complex physical consepts to the mainstream.
This was the best interview I've EVER seen between a physicist and non-physicist. Huge credit to the interviewer for asking all the right questions, understanding the answers, not repeating questions, and asking great logical follow up questions. It takes a lot of smarts to be able to do that.
Brian is the most charismatic entertaining, articulate and interesting scientist I have ever heard speak. Most scientists are very boring and they don't explain things in a charismatic, entertaining fashion. But Brian always delivers!
The Future would be so Lonely, Everyone you know would be Gone*:..(
im glad teenagers (at least my friends and i) are ultra interested and we influence others to get interested in this and we talk about physics and math more than movies or tv shows, and honestly i think one must naturally adapt to develop an interest in this fascinating subject.
Great interview on the part of both participants. Brian Greene has such an engaging way of explaining very complex phenomena that he is a joy to listen to.
One of the best interviews of all time ❤️❤️
this is probably the greatest interview in history
This is such an amazing interview. The host is so candid and honest with her reactions and questions, while Brian doing a brilliant job enunciating his ideas with such finesse.
Enjoyed every second of it.
I love her reaction... I felt like I was there with her reacting to all that information. Awesome interview!!!
Great question and lots of flirting..perfect
Finally, an interested interviewer.
She was excellent. She Is excellent. She WILL BE excellent 🌬🌞🌝🌟🌎⏱🕰⏰⌚️
Excellent interview, a combination of well-prepared topics and good timing in questions. The speed was great to keep attention at full. I loved it!!!!
I'm impressed by her questions. Brian is such a great educator.
She is absolutely great!! I want to hear more of her interviews.
Brilliant interviewer! A classy beautiful intellegent woman! She has it all! Thanks for uploading this.
Great interviewer and Brian Greene is great as always!
Great interview, she had enough knowledge about the subject to ask good questions.
really a good interviewer and Brain is amazing he explains perfectly
he is so passionate about what he does. absolutely love him.
Loved the host, her excitements for science :-)
This is one of the greatest video/interviews I have ever watched
The lady hosting the event is Faith Salie. Although she is a journalist by profession, she is a graduate from Harvard and Oxford universities besides being a Rhodes scholar. It shows in the way she asks the questions.
She is a Rhodes scholar! Wow. That is impressive.
I love him! Can listen to him all day
Amazing! Very intelligent, asking the right questions and Brian Greene answering them in the best way possible
"...I mean there's always been quantum physics, it just wasn't named" 😂😂😂 she's so adorable
Min 19:00 and min 23:00 mad o🤯🤯 btw does anyone else notice the chemistry between both of them? They look like they could go on for the next two hours, absolutely enjoying each other's company
Could be
I really enjoyed the question she asked also Brain's answer on Newton and Einstein. To me in order 1 Newton 2 Eisenstein and 3 Richard Feynman. I wish Brain would give up the String Theory because I don't think it will ever unify General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics because of there is no concise understanding of gravity on Quantum Physics, I think.
So everything I watched in cartoon shows during my childhood isn't impossible,loved it
When she asked "what is time?" When Brian started saying he didn't know I kept screaming "Say it!" Say "Entropy!"
You might wanna get your brain checked if you scream at the screen for no reason. Maybe get a psychiastrist.
Little Ears lmao
@@y7952 My psychiatrist said I should not reply to crazy people on the internet.
time is not exactly entropy, but it can be defined an entropy.
@@keithmercer8439 if time is entropy, blackhole has high entropy still time stops there, WHY?
She actually listens. Then ask appropriately intelligent questions. He responds in the layman's term possible. She follows up and give feedback. He expounds, validates and clarifies her observations. She verbalized her understanding at which point they move on to the next topic. This is the the unified theory of good conversation.
We all must admire anchor to ask such a brillent question.
Kudos to her.
I wonder how many lives I've inadvertently taken, or saved through the butterfly effect..
Stopping at a junction to allow a car to pass, that type of thing..
The Butterfly effect is always in effect.
Try to picture this:
You want to meet with a friend of yours.
In the last minute your friend tells you over the telephone that the meeting is canceled.
Now you stay at home for lunch, instead going out and eat somewhere on the fly.
And because you eat at home, instead somewhere else, you use up your food a tiny bit faster as you would have otherwise.
As a result you go shopping on monday morning, instead maybe on monday noon.
And because you go in the morning you encounter different people in the supermarket.
In the casshier line you have a lot more people as if you would have had on noon, so you wait longer there and maybe hold of some other guy for 5 minutes.
That other guy now hits the road 5 minutes later and influences the traffic for someone else in a complete different way.
You could spin this into endless outcomes, until you realize:
You always change the whole of everything no matter what you do. If you sit silently in a cave for 30 years you effect the world just as much as if you would travel from place to place.
12
She's a good host, she asks right questions.
This interview was like watching Dark again.
I love the facial expressions shes making
Its like me sitting there not only she portrayed my face but my inner simple questions
Its amazing how prof greene can articulate complex subjects.
prof, if you're reading this im one of your biggest fan. Love from Philippines
Really , Such a great explainer ,I could listen to him for hours.
Superbly well balanced and clear descriptions of these concepts.
This lady is amazing interviewing scientists, congrats.
great great host. She asks the questions we have because she understands the question enough to ask the correct question of someone not in understanding the some way someone not understanding would ask it, if they understood… very nice
Prof.Brian Green is an excellent communicator on these themes about the cosmos, I find his talks clearer than some of the other pundits and their big egos
Truly when she pronounced Mahabharata I was speechless
Ya
She told that it's a story.
Gg nationalist
Brian is awesome, she also was smart
@Moth’s Mummy Knowing more vocabulary doesn't necessarily make you smarter.
@Moth’s Mummy r/iamverysmart
"she also was smart" -- No. Someone smart prepared the questions and she is merely reading them.
@@johnnastrom9400 Definitely not pre prepared questions. She is following up on his answers. And she seems genuinly curious and interested.
@Moth’s Mummy Actually, the word was "epistemic"
4:06 Sheldon Cooper: Ohhh YOU TAKE THAT BACCCKK😤😤😤
No
Great interviewer, she is not afraid of looking dumb at all and keeps asking what she thinks is relevant to the conversation.
Well....almost all the comments was about the interviewer😂😂😂😂😂 Wonderful show it was!
Has anyone here experienced feelings of traveling thru space only to find yourself back on a time line you have been on before.
If time is relative then there has to be a deeper understanding of what time is made of
Haha aww they were totally flirting together in a cute science way
😂💯
I knew it before it started, cuz travel through the past.
@@skullymoney4143 lol 😆 😂
You cen feel the wibe :-)
She is one of the best interviewer ever
I like the intivewer. Asks the right questions.
Just subbed
Wanna time travel? Go to sleep for 8 hours and you’ll be transported 8 hours into the future!
Only consciously in relative term. Subconsciously and physically, you are still in the time line before sleep.
@@senna1rossi come on,That's a joke
@@senna1rossi exactly if u observe it in quantum form or in simple words wave form than the timeline is going in its same speed.
"Sleep is a time machine!" - Owl City in the song "Lucid Dream"
What if I waked up?
What is Time?
1. Assume the three dimensional Universe is inside a three dimensional photo Frame. Everything in this universe is dynamic and changing in relative to other things and itself. Entropy is changing also.
2. The whole Universe inside the frame marked as Now Moment is separated from previous Now Moment by shortest possible separator Plunk-time.
3. Last Now Moments are Record, History, Memory or Information. Next Now Moments are next changed states of the Universe inside Frame.
4. Only Now Moment Exist. Past and Future do not exist.
5. Conscious Mind can make predictions of next Moments from experience and can plan events for next Moments.
6. Every Plunk-Volume’s “Now” of the Universe including space and stuffs in it is always in the same Now Moment Frame of the Universe. Relative Clock ticking, fast or slow, at different points for different conditions does not shift anything to previous or next Moment Frames of the Universe. All points Now remain in the Now Moment Frame of the Universe. That is why twins of paradox can meet at any ones Now though relatively they are backward or forward in respect of amount of time elapsed. Time travel is not possible. Our invented Clocks and Calendars are misleading us about time
7. Moment is repeating at Plunk-Time separation, even if nothing is changing, something is changing or all things are changing in the Universe. Flow of Time forward or backward does not exist. No arrow of time. It is arrow of Change. Only Moment is ticking repeatedly at Plunk-Time interval with a 3D-Photo of the Universe. Many clocks are under one Universal clock. Some clocks ticking different than universal clock. Reference frames and Clocks are there at every Plunk-Volume’s.
Md. Fazlul Karim Completely agree to that. It’s exactly what I had in mind. There is one way to travel to the future, it’s going somewhere where effects on our metabolism is slower. We would age slower, then going back to the original place, we would be younger that we should have been, like we traveled in time. Our meat and milk in the fridge is traveling time, because submitted to different conditions, by the metabolism being slowed down.
Travel to the past as an observer means going faster than light. We’re already seeing everything from the past. I mean, when we see something, it means it happened a fraction ago, time for light which bounced on that object to reach our eyes and information being processed by our brain. It seems simultaneous because light travel fast, but it’s physically not. When observing a far distanced object, like a faraway star, we see the light bouncing at it minutes, hours or even years ago. So if we can travel faster than light, go to a faraway place and observe earth, we would see earth at the point it was minutes, hours ou years before we left it, feeling we traveled back in time. But it can be only as an observer, of that light. Am I missing something ?
I know where you are coming from, but let's start with four spatial dimensions plus duration. Space & time have many directions.
Great interview.!
Learned alot.!
The first youtube video exceeding 10mins I watched full without skipping. (I don't have ads though), what a wonderful interview.
Gone time has been spent.. yet to come time isn't here yet.
We ought to focus on 'moving forward' in the present (time on hand).
And only God knows best.
What is time? Time is an abstract concept.
Love his explanations
actually, time travel appeared earlier in the Quran, on the story about Seven Sleepers (People of the Cave') in which a group of youths who hid inside a cave outside the city of Ephesus around 250 AD to escape a religious persecution and emerged some 300 years later.
The books mentioned in the video are way way older than quran.
@@samgloster2singh736 Nope. The books mentioned here are 400 Years older more or less. Quran is 1400 Years old.
@@showravhasan2371 Just to enrich you, the Mahabharata is at least 2500-3000 years old, if not more.
@@DipanDas Only talking about the scientific books and Quran according to the video.
@@showravhasan2371 You didnt mention that.
Came here after watching the netflix show dark. This is one of the most fascinating conversations I’ve ever heard 🤯. The “chronology projection conjecture” is like the whole plot of the show.
Brian Greene:One of the Great Ambassadors of Science!!!