Thermodynamics - 3-5 Pure substances property tables - Changing states example 1

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 13 окт 2024
  • Download these fill-in-the-blank notes here: drive.google.c...
    Pure Substances
    Water and Refrigerant
    Thermodynamics Property Tables
    Saturated liquid vapor mixture. Quality. Specific Enthalpy.
    Rigid tanks. Closed Systems
    And now you can purchase my Thermodynamics notes completely filled in (184 pages of notes and problems) for $50 here: sowl.co/ksG5e

Комментарии • 32

  • @turk2589
    @turk2589 3 года назад +7

    Your students are very lucky. When I was in the university, we had to deal with much harder problems in the thermodynamics exams, including double interpolations and complex systems.

    • @turk2589
      @turk2589 3 года назад +1

      By the way, your lectures are excellent, too.

    • @burakemreevrenos8385
      @burakemreevrenos8385 Год назад

      Hangi üniversitedeydiniz hocam

  • @mdlass4124
    @mdlass4124 3 года назад +15

    Hey. shouldn't we also be using 0.0014 for v in the first part?

    • @engineeringdeciphered
      @engineeringdeciphered  3 года назад +11

      Yes, it looks like I accidentally used the volume of 0.014, but should have been using the specific volume of 0.0014.

    • @engineeringdeciphered
      @engineeringdeciphered  3 года назад +6

      But I think all the other numbers (the x and everything else) are still correct. I just miswrote it wrong there.

    • @mdlass4124
      @mdlass4124 3 года назад

      @@engineeringdeciphered oh okay👌🏽

    • @jasperaj2487
      @jasperaj2487 2 месяца назад

      @@engineeringdeciphered came to comments to also as that thanks sir!!

  • @asf_x1302
    @asf_x1302 2 года назад +5

    I think the Volume is 0.014 m^3 , which means the 14L/1000m^3 = 0.014m^3
    the quality X will be 0.19 for state1 and 0.393 for state 2 .. Am I right?

    • @nourdarwish4277
      @nourdarwish4277 2 года назад

      I think the same; because in state 2 (vf & vg) changed, so the quality (x) must change to be equal to 0.394😅
      And H = 1527.846 kJ

    • @ramiljr.donina4007
      @ramiljr.donina4007 2 месяца назад

      specific volume was used, meaning 0.0014m^3/kg.

  • @DiyaPatel-v9r
    @DiyaPatel-v9r Год назад

    This is a great playlist!! Do u have one for thermo 2 as well? i m taking it next semester after this course.

  • @nourdarwish4277
    @nourdarwish4277 2 года назад

    I think in state2 x isn't the same value as in state1; because in state 2 (vf & vg) changed, so the quality (x) must change to be equal to 0.394😅
    And H = 1527.846 kJ, am I wrong teacher?

  • @mothug978
    @mothug978 2 года назад

    Professor, how did you find T= 0.61 C? Thank you in advance!

    • @mothug978
      @mothug978 2 года назад

      I got it... through interpolation of the Tsat between 280 and 320 Kpa.

    • @abdallahhamdan4505
      @abdallahhamdan4505 Год назад

      @@mothug978 can you explain it please

    • @mothug978
      @mothug978 Год назад

      @@abdallahhamdan4505 Your pressure = 300 Kpa, and need to find Tsat. By using Table A-12, you have to interpolate between pressure 280 Kpa and 320 Kpa to find your Tsat. Hope that helps

  • @ibraheemmuslih4389
    @ibraheemmuslih4389 Год назад

    How would I know if the 'x' value makes sense or not?

    • @engineeringdeciphered
      @engineeringdeciphered  Год назад

      X is zero if it’s a sat liquid and x is 1 if it’s a sat vapor. And x = 0.5 if it’s halfway between. So if your value is closer to the sat vapor value then your x should be above 0.5. If your value is very close to the sat vapor value then your x should be closer to 1.

    • @ibraheemmuslih4389
      @ibraheemmuslih4389 Год назад

      @@engineeringdeciphered Thank you very much

  • @mkhairulirwantarmedi7356
    @mkhairulirwantarmedi7356 2 года назад +1

    how do u find t

  • @victorcasillas8057
    @victorcasillas8057 3 года назад

    why didnt the equation for X, mass of vapor over total mass work ?

    • @engineeringdeciphered
      @engineeringdeciphered  3 года назад +1

      Because we don’t know the mass of the vapor. So the way I did it is easiest. There is probably a way to find the mass of the vapor but it would be a lot more work than the way I did it.

    • @victorcasillas8057
      @victorcasillas8057 3 года назад

      @@engineeringdeciphered Thank you.

  • @yigitcan824
    @yigitcan824 10 месяцев назад

    Professor where's the question 10 .Before this video its Q9 and in this video Q11

  • @rayhangu8403
    @rayhangu8403 3 года назад

    Can I get that table?

    • @engineeringdeciphered
      @engineeringdeciphered  3 года назад +1

      www.dropbox.com/s/tuqy5e8657ysoda/Property%20Tables%20-%20Appendices%201%20and%202.pdf?dl=0

    • @turk2589
      @turk2589 3 года назад

      You can also find the tables in the internet.

  • @walkingunknown07
    @walkingunknown07 3 года назад +1

    x should equal to .19746

    • @walkingunknown07
      @walkingunknown07 3 года назад

      for the first problem

    • @engineeringdeciphered
      @engineeringdeciphered  3 года назад

      @@walkingunknown07 did you see this other comment? I think I miswrote .014 and should have been .0014. So I think my final answer is the correct one?

  • @bereketgirma8613
    @bereketgirma8613 3 года назад

    i think you made a mistake calculating vg