The History of Turkic Peoples. Percentage of Proto-Turkic ancestry: Every Year.
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 ноя 2023
- This map shows the spread of the Turks from eastern Mongolia to lands from southwest to northeast Asia.
Articles:
A Dynamic 6,000-Year Genetic History of
Eurasia’s Eastern Steppe
137 ancient human genomes from across the
Eurasian steppes
Triangulation supports agricultural spread of
the Transeurasian languages
The genetic origin of Huns, Avars, and
conquering Hungarians
Ancient genomes reveal origin and rapid trans-
Eurasian migration of 7th century Avar elites
Music:
Toquz Oyuz - Epic Turkic Music
Egypt Calling Song -Sight of Wonders
Damo - Music Turkish No Copyright 2020
good to see another video of yours!
The word Tiele is a distorted Chinese spelling of the word Türk, who are the ancestors of the Uyghurs.
They were also known in Chinese sources as Tingling
In Latin sources, they were mentioned as the Torcilingi and Torci people.
Because of the height of their chariots, they were called Gaoche people, meaning "those of high chariots."
you dealt with these people as if they were several peoples.
As for the Göktürks, they were the descendants of the southern Xiongnu.
Xuinu is also a distorted way of saying Hunu. Group names for peoples the chinese encountered in antiquity make a lot more sense if read in classical chinese rather than modern madarin.
I expected to see Aqqoyunlu, Qaraqoyunlus on Eastern Anatolia. It would be good if you added them. Most of them was Nomadic Turcomans. Later some of it converted to Shia and migrated to todays South Azerbaijan under Safavid Rule, Others stayed as Sunni and migrated to Western Anatolia via Ottoman Policies on 18th century. Anyways thats actually a great video keep it up brother!
Aqqoyunlu and Qaraqoyunlu was azerbaijani medieval states
@@EldarMustafayev728 I Know Brother and They are Turkic too
@@limonya видимо у них нет тюркских аутосом просто, да и гаплотипов изначальных тюрок типа N1b2 у азербайджанцев мало (зато были у бакинских ханов) и у малочисленных потомков сельджуков в Турции как Денишмениды . Гены персов греков курдов и талышей и армян всё вымыли.
@@user-lk6wx5od4pI don't think Turkish DNA is N DNA.
@@tanhukim9963Династия Бакинских ханов и династия Данишменидов это N , они сельджуки самые старые.
i love that you make these kinds of videos. Keep it up! Also can you do Germanic next?
Thanks for map
Very nice! I liked your video about Uralic peoples!
You also have a good video about Uralic languages!
An important caveat: 'Turks' did not "borrow a nomadic lifestyle" from Indo-Europeans. One part of ancestors of proto-Turks(who were millet and rice farmers mainly in 5th millenium BCE) left Manchuria/Southeastern Siberia(probably due to steppification of the area by severe droughts as such phenomena constantly happen even today) and mixed with paleo-Siberian reindeer herders who were nomads already, and long before the Indo-European/Scythian admixture they mixed with those people and adopted herder-nomadism. Indo-European nomads(Scythians or a sister branch of proto-IE people) gave those pre-proto-Turks *equestrianism* , NOT necessarily *nomadism*.
In short: pre/proto-Turks were already nomads, reindeer and cattle herding nomads, but not horse nomads before intermixing with IE equestrians.
zero knowledge but a million ideas.
@@HatredForMankind
The Turks are not from Manchuria, and the early Turks were never pure Mongoloids and farmers
The ancestors of the Turks since at least the Bronze Age lived in Tarim, Ordos, western Altai and the eastern steppes of modern Kazakhstan
The Turks were originally cattle breeders and horse breeders
@@HatredForMankind
Indo-Europeans did not reach further than the Tien Shan and the Western Tarim
@@IsmailAlqirmi I am talking about the formation of proto-Turks. Horses came from the west, from Ponto-Caspian steppes and gradually introduced to the east.
I love these videos please do more❤
very nice
I'm glad you haven't forgotten about us, Saha. But we cannot be only 40% Turks., we take our history back to shortly before the 6th century. According to any Diagrams of Turkic families, I mean ANY diagrams, we are included as the second oldest living Turks after the Chuvash, who are from the Bulgarian branch(You can see it in the language too). The Kurykans lived in the 6th - 11th centuries, and before him we had common Turkic-Mongolic tribes like a Batyly, Khatygyn, Chordu, Baydy, Amydai etc.
In our language, 47% (half) are Turkic, 27% Mongolian, 6% common Turkic-Mongolian, 10% Tungusic-Manchu, 10%(≈9,7%) of unknown origin.
Among 47% of Turkic part: 26% Ancient Turkic, 53% Medieval Turkic, 21% Modern Turkic.
Our genetics also stands out for its age. I mean even the Mongols himself are MORE TURKIC than us??? Like WTF????
So 40% is too incorrect.
Thank you brother, I agree with your opinion, it is a correct explanation.
Saha u mean Sakha?
Amazing,keep up the good work
Hey dude nice work and i really like your videos can i give you an idea for a next video? Do a map of paleo balkanic adn(thracians ilyrians, paonians etc)
I think it would be nicer if the colour palet was adjusted less frequently so the purity levels going down could be more easily seen.
Why do you think that ancient Turkc-speaking Bulgars had 0% of Turks? Maybe, had they about 10% of Turks?
Genomes from the Saltovo-Mayaki culture of the Kharkov region that belong to the Khazars show the identity to modern North Caucasians.
media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41586-018-0094-2/MediaObjects/41586_2018_94_Fig2_HTML.jpg
In addition, the genomes of the Late Avar elite of the Danube show a component associated with the North Caucasians.
ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0092867422002677-figs1.jpg
Also, modern descendants of the Volga Bulgars and especially the Kazan Tatars show admixture from the North Caucasus. Bulgarians, Romanians and especially Gagauzians also show admixture associated with the North Caucasus
i.imgur.com/bYBQ9cy.png
@@The_Geographer_Maps🤡
The Mongoloid (Proto-Turkic) peoples in the Altai Mountains embraced Iranic culture (horsemanship, nomadic way of life, traditions, clothing) and mixed with the Indo-Iranians to form their own unique Iranic-Mongoloid.
Yes transeurasic family languages proven 2022
I'd like to see Germanic or Italic next!
Great video.
All Medieval Turkics are Eurasian. Including Kipchaks who lived in Kazakhstan and Russia. Let's model modern Turks with Kipchaks to see how Turkic they are.
Target: Turkish(West)
Distance: 0.6720% / 0.00672047
31.2 KAZ_Kipchak
30.2 Anatolia_Center_Phrygian_650BC
16.4 Paleo-Balkan+Slavic_MNE_Doclea_Bjelovine
9.2 Caucasus_BlackSea_Samsun_B_150BC
8.0 IRN_Hasanlu_IA
5.0 Levant_Sidon_1800BC
Target: Turkish(Bolu)
Distance: 0.7747% / 0.00774707
35.8 KAZ_Kipchak
24.4 Anatolia_Center_Phrygian_650BC
16.4 IRN_Hasanlu_IA
14.2 Paleo-Balkan+Slavic_MNE_Doclea_Bjelovine
5.4 Caucasus_BlackSea_Samsun_B_150BC
2.4 Mycenaean_Greek_1350BC
1.4 Levant_Sidon_1800BC
Target: Turkish(Muğla)
Distance: 0.7316% / 0.00731601
42.6 KAZ_Kipchak
27.2 Anatolia_Center_Phrygian_650BC
13.6 IRN_Hasanlu_IA
6.8 Mycenaean_Greek_1350BC
6.6 Paleo-Balkan+Slavic_MNE_Doclea_Bjelovine
3.2 Caucasus_BlackSea_Samsun_B_150BC
@@xdd87 not gonna lie that's not relevant to me eshberok.
@@noahtylerpritchett2682 What's eshbrok? Lmao. I replied according to your own other comments.
@@xdd87 eshberok means foreigner in proto-germanic.
So you think Proto-Turkic people were 100% Mongoloid?
Self eawtasien scyhtians saka writting is 2023 proven iranic. They found an bilingual text. Turks are eastasiens
@@ChristopherTanne-se3pzİskitler iranliydida niye sürekli perslerle ,farslarla yani iranilerle savaşıyordu peki
@@ChristopherTanne-se3pzbulunan bı yazı o halkın ırkını gostermez
Can you comment the exact Proto-Turkic ancestry percentage of Central Asian Turks (Qazaqs, Uzbeks, Kirghizs, Turkmens, Karakalpaks, Tuvans and Uighurs) Volgan Turks (Bashkirs, Siberian Tatars, Volga Tatars and Chuvash), and Mongolic-speaking people?
This is the earliest detailed names of the peoples of the region and they are from Russian Primary Chronicle.
Most of these peoples are not on the English Wikipedia, but are on the Russian Wikipedia.
Here is their Russian name: Сумь, Емь, Чудь.
@@The_Geographer_MapsWhy are you posting the names of uralic people?
@@The_Geographer_Maps eh I asked the exact Proto-Turkic percentages of some Turkic people, why are you commenting this?
Where can I download the soundtrack?
Can U pls make about sino Tibetan ancestry?🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Bulgars 0%? What is your source for this? There are a few samples thought to be Bulgar, and they have as much East Eurasian component as the Bashkirs.
The elite of the Avar Kaganate from the 8th to 9th centuries shows the emergence of a new genetic component associated with the North Caucasus, apparently from the Bulgars. Moreover, this component lacks East Asian origin.
Article:
Ancient genomes reveal origin and rapid trans-Eurasian migration of 7th century Avar elites
ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0092867422002677-figs2.jpg
ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0092867422002677-figs1.jpg
In addition, samples from the Saltovo-Mayaki culture of the 8th to 10th centuries in the Kharkov region, apparently belonging to the Khazars, show the identity to the North Caucasians.
media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41586-018-0094-2/MediaObjects/41586_2018_94_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Also, my calculations on Vahaduo about Balkan populations show the absence of East Asian ancestry not from Turkish, but a good presence of ancestry from the North Caucasus.
Albanian Chechen Kazakh Slovakian Turkish_Antalya
Gagauz 66.5 9.8 0.2 19.5 4.1
Bulgarian 60.9 4.9 0.3 30.4 3.4
Macedonian 66.6 1.9 0.0 31.5 0.0
Serbian 49.9 2.2 0.2 47.5 0.3
Also, non-Fino-Ugric East Asian ancestry is absent among the populations of the Volga Bulgaria region which were not influenced by the Kipchaks.
Chechen Erzya Kazakh Mansi
Chuvash 6.5 57.6 1.3 34.6
Udmurt 10.7 48.2 0.0 41.1
Mari 1.7 49.2 0.0 49.2
Tatar_Kazan 13.0 59.8 13.8 13.4
@@The_Geographer_Maps it's known for a fact that Khazars ADOPTED the Saltovo-Mayaki culture, they were NOT their descendants. Plus how exactly did Ding-Ling people had %0 Turkic? The Chinese sources do not differentiate them from Han Chinese by appearance. Also, the *New Book* written by old Chinese historians say that they intermarried with Yenisei Kirghizs which proves that they got their Indo-European influence later.
Bulgarians are definitely not a Slavic people. Unfortunately, you are a people who have forgotten their identity.
Excellent video, what surprised me was that Bulgharic branch (Sabir, Chuvash, Khazars) has negligible p-Turkic DNA. Were the nomads really that outnumbered?
Culturally, anthropologically, and genetically, the Bulghars were Sarmatians, namely Alans, spreading from the Caucasus from the beginning of CE. numerous waves of Türks eventually Turkified the local Sarmatians.
@@The_Geographer_Maps No, Bulgars have been a Turkic people from the beginning, genetically, culturally and anthropologically.
@@The_Geographer_Maps Where did that %40 Mongoloid ancestry of Bulgars come from then?
@@x-error404alphaepicfellsan9 Mongol and Mongoloid are modern terms. The ancient Mongols of Genghis Khan are the Turks. But we do not deny that modern Mongols have the dna of the Turks, since we are nomads and lived together.
@@The_Geographer_Maps "Culturally, anthropologically, and genetically, the Bulghars were Sarmatians", LMAO, hence their turkic name and turkic language, right?
Greetings from Hungary to our all Turkic brothers 🤘🐺🇹🇷🇺🇿🇰🇿🇹🇲🇰🇬🇭🇺🇧🇬🐎🏹
The Mongoloid (Proto-Turkic) peoples in the Altai Mountains embraced Iranic culture (horsemanship, nomadic way of life, traditions, clothing) and mixed with the Indo-Iranians to form their own unique Iranic-Mongoloid
@@VerbalWarrior162 No, Iranians actually adopted Turkish culture and Indo-European is a theory.
Thank you Hungarian brothers.
Indo european is not a theory@@TarkanCAGRI
Tatkan belives in alp tunga. An createt fiktiv caracter with leopard fur on had wirtten 1500 years after scyhtian. He beloefs in an turkish batman hahahahahahha
Do altaic as a whole next
Fun fact: Most of the tribes shown in video has no DNA samples taken from them.
But ofc when it comes to Turk peoples it has an "Turkicmeter". Yet no IE discussions has such a teatment. Plus, Khazars have %0 Turkic DNA? what?
Data on many ancient Turkic populations, due to lack of genetic data or due to their diversity within the population, are taken mainly at the expense of modern populations.
Data from the remains of the Saltovo-Mayaki culture of the Kharkov region belonging to the Khazars show identity with the Caucasian Alans.
media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41586-018-0094-2/MediaObjects/41586_2018_94_Fig2_HTML.jpg
And by the way I have IEmeter
just a video made by a Kazakh😂
@@yakutia159he is belarus, And in general, this is nonsense, the history of the Turks is so much rewritten and distorted, making the Turks Bulgars, Khazars, Huns, and others not Turks, without recognizing that during the guns and the domination of the Turkic Khaganates, the common Turkic language was like English for Asia. Now all Turks are divided, calling them Turkicized, making stupid arguments, calling them not Turks.
I agree 100%, such a glaring double standard and a ploy used to create division amongst the Turkic people.
Turkey is wrong according to the map which is based on "Turkic ancestry" Which sample of Turkic dna results did you use? For example, some DNA sample results show that Xiongnu samples had %60-70 east asian and siberian(Dodecad k12b), Gokturks had around %80 and medieval Turks(Kara-khanid) had around %45. So, Modern Turks in Turkey has %8-22 which is changeable from region to region. So, Middle-North Black Sea region should be higher in color and western Turkey must be higher than central and eastern anatolia. According to medieval Turkic results, Turks in Turkey must be %25-50 based on regions.
Except those, Thanks for the video, i really liked it.
My mistake by the way, I only based the results on "east asian and siberian" There are other things in a DNA test(gedrosia,north european etc.) But generally two things i mentioned is mostly used for the results to compare.
Samsar47, sen samsar değil tam bir Kürtçü sansar olmalısın.imal ettiğin ima'lı önermelerden, zihninin gerisinden nasıl bir Kürtçülük parıltısı geçtiği okunabiliyor. video-yapımcısı şöyle deseydi eminim ki çok sevinirdin: "Türkiye de hiç Türk yoktur, bütün Türkiye Türkleri aslında Kürt'tür."
@@cevdetaygun5969 aynennnnn gardaşımm kesin kürtçü falanımdır. ingilizcen a0 seviyede olduğundan bi sikim anlayamamışsın.
نسبة أتراك في تركيا أقل من 2٪ .... 96٪ من سكان جمهورية تركيا مزيفة هم يونانين و أرمن و أكراد و عرب تم تتريكهم ...... و للمعلومة لغة تركية لجمهورية تركيا هي لغة هجينة خليط من لغة عربية و فارسية
the most objective video on turkic geographical step ancestry...🙏🙏🙏🇹🇷🌏
The Mongoloid (Proto-Turkic) peoples in the Altai Mountains embraced Iranic culture (horsemanship, nomadic way of life, traditions, clothing) and mixed with the Indo-Iranians to form their own unique Iranic-Mongoloid
@@VerbalWarrior162ahahahaah you are a loser
The amount of information in this video is impressive. I can't imagine creating anything similar to this.
I don't know enough about any of this to how accurate it is, but I wonder: Didn't the Turks migrate to Anatolia in the 1200s? I thought the whole reason why they migrated to Anatolia in the first place was to flee from the Mongol invasions that occurred in that century?
Edit: I guess that's not really true.
Is it possible that some of these people migrated to italy or spain a few centuries ago? I believe to have (confirmed by DNA) some of this heritage, coming from Spain or Italy. I'm thinking probably Spain mostly.
No, maybe some arabic if you are from spain or southern italy
@@usputar4873 they had, but we did as they did to us before (Reconquista)
Correction: Pakistan has over 2 million Hazaras who are Turko-Mongols. Quetta, Bolachistan has entire neighbourhoods. Hazara Town, Mariabad are Hazara dominant with some of then found in Islamabad. You should have shown Hazaras living in Bolachistan with a 'blob' !!!
Gen. Musa Khan, Air Marshal Ali Changzi are two famous examples.
The spread of Turkish in Anatolia seems to be a bit wrong. Western Anatolia, and North east Turkey and Eastern Thrace already had a Turkish majority/plurality before the 19th century.
Amazing how Mongols are more Turkic than a lot of modern Turkic nations. But it is no wonder on a second thought because Mongolia was where the proto Turks originated.
Exactly mongols except kalmyks didn't really didn't move any were else TURKIC PEOPLE on the udder hand did This is way you will find TURKIC spiking people from Siberia to Europe all the way to Africa
Another guy who thinks that all Turkic are Turkish
@@sPaCeDay91 Turk comes from Turkic anyway.
@@KarapapakOguzTurkualtai was inhabited by indo-european people,turks come later
The population of the Mongols is 3 million today. The population of the Turks is 200 million. The Mongols were never very populous. The power of Genghis Khan comes from the Turks because Genghis Khan is related to the Turks and the Mongols. Mongolia is not where the Turks come from. The place where the Turks come from is Siberia, not Mongolia Turks lived in China, Mongalia, India, Pakistan, Iran and many other countries, but their place of origin is Siberian Altai.
Turkmens should be on the 40% atleast, I saw alot of them getting above 50% central Asian, plus they gotta that Q-M242 haplogroup which is east asian
Do History of Japonic People
this is the video
Do semitic speakers and proto semitic ancestry
do Germanic next
Excellent! I would suggest that majority of people living in Eastern Turkey be Turkish too. Contrary to the popular belief, Kurdish population there is in minority.
Evet abi ya. Ayıp ediyorlar valla
Utanmadan yalan söylemeyin.
He's blatantly lying.
Make about Mongolic peoples
What is Xianyun?
Xianyun is nomadic people which inhabited in modern-day mongolia and raided the bronze age china, the information about them is small because the zhou dynasty descripted them and of for 3000 years the some sources were disappeared by the time we know only they were nomad and raided zhou dynasty
So, were they considered Turkic?
@antoinelavoisier2772 genetically they are ancestors of xiongnu and so they could speak in pre proto turkic language
Siberian Tatar, They migrated to Siberia after the disintegration of the Mongol Golden Horde, and they are not ancient Mongol-speaking Tatars. They are descendants of the Volga Bulgarians. They were called Tatars because of the Mongol ruling elite, “Tatars,” and they are not true Tatars.
How is Turkey? They was borned so late? Where was they before? Where did they come from?
The ancestors of the Turks of Turkey conquered Iran, Afghanistan, Iraq and Arabia in the 1030s from the east of the Caspian Sea, that is, the territory of Turkmenistan, and established the "Seljuk Empire". They defeated the Byzantine Emperor in 1071 and settled in Anatolia. After the Seljuk Empire collapsed, it was divided into many parts. Then the Ottoman Empire in the west. In the east, the Safavid Empire was born again, and the Ottoman Empire was dissolved in 1919 after the First World War, and the Republic of Turkey was established on the remaining lands.
@@user-jh8gz1lo4e thanks for your infor, 😊😊😊😊😊😊
The Khazars Convert To Judaism ✡In 730, I Living In Tel Aviv, But My Ancestors Come From Crimea. I Am verry prouded with my Khazar ancestors. and not all Jewish are descended from Jacobs 12 Tribe, like my and the other Ashkenazi Groups. also Ashkenazi was one of the sons of Japheth!
And you should be proud how are christians and MUSLAM are proud about there religion
U are Oghur Turkic🫶🏻
You are Turkic 🇲🇳🇲🇳🇲🇳
The ancestry of the ancestors did not make the Crimea. The Khazar was tolerant. Their descendants founded Turkey. He installed it in Hungary. Kievi is their creation. Bulgaria they founded. And they are not Jews. Quintessentially Turks. Even those who made a state in the Germanic tribes. They ruled Iran for years. Even Palestine. Do what suits you now and stop the genocide.
you ain't even jew, you are turk then
If Turks were moved from Manchuria to Mongolia, then Turks should have lots of similar words (that was created during agricultural revolution) to Mongolic languages but Turkic languages are heavily similar to Hungarian instead of Central Asian people's languages. The fact is we see the words similar between Mongol and Turkic languages after Iron Age. Oldest words we know that exist in Turkish language is related to agricultural life,farming activities and some animal names which don't exist in Mongolia or Manchuria.
When we see the DNA samples from Scythian kurgans,that show us r1az93-94 genes, people might think those people who were burried in kurgans are part of Indo-European people but according to ancient Chinese records Turks look like Caucasians,which fits in genetic researches. Also the Issyk inscriptions become more meaningful if scientists try do decipher the language according to Turkish language rules insteading of Indo-European linguistic rules. Cavalry culture has also remained among Turks but we can not see this culture's continuation in Iran or other European people.
So, We have two hypotheses. 1st: Turks are assimilated Indo-Europeans.,2nd: Scythian Empire ruling class were Turks while majority of citizens were Iranian but we see the R1az93-94 genes in modern day Turkish people as well as we see it in Central Asia Turks. If Turks were assimilated Indo-Europeans,then we must congratulate the Asiatic nomads who forced thousands of people to live with Turkish culture,habbits,beliefs but in the history we see that Turks always lost their identity when they conquered a new place and where they become minorities,so this hypotesis is not logical. 2nd hypotesis is more logical according to Chinese Records saying that "Turks immigrated from west of Caspian Sea" , and Herodot's tales about Yurkae people and Amazons (women warriors which is very common in ancient Turks), and immigration of Az people around 1st century according to ancient Roman records and the scrypts we see in Scandinavia...
Swedish scientists have researches about the Turks' migration and notes about Odin's migration from somewhere called Turkland. The similarity between Viking Runes and Turkic runes all across Asia is an evidence for this migration.
If this Altay-Tanrı Mountains hypotesis were true,then Turkish language should have lots of similarity in prehistoric era words with Mongolian and other central Asia local languages,but with the light of philology and genetic researches,what we see is a migration from Urals to inner Asia. Even the word "tarım" (farming) is one of the oldest words in Turkish language and not similar to any Mongol-Manchu language word. If Turks were Asiatic nomads, then all those words related to farming activities should be derived from neighbouring people's languages but we don't see such phenomenon in Turkish,instead we see too many similarity wih Hungarian.
Tofa Soyot were Samoyed who after the seventeenth century turned into Turks.
Nice video, but there is a significant Turkic heritage among today's Tatars and ancient Bulgars
Where do you get your data about the Bulgars?
@@The_Geographer_Maps RUclips won't let me write.
@@Sadoyasturadoglu Probably all due to the transfer of links. You can write the name of the study.
@@The_Geographer_Maps A Bulgar sample from the 9th or 10th century was shared in "the Turkish DNA project" Bulgaria Turks were ranked 1st on the affinity list and had an eastern Eurasian heritage at a level similar to that of modern Turks (other Balkan peoples have this east Asian heritage at the level of no or much lower).
@@Sadoyasturadoglu Alas, I could not find this sample.
The elite of the Avar Kaganate from the 8th to 9th centuries shows the emergence of a new genetic component associated with the North Caucasus, apparently from the Bulgars. Moreover, this component lacks East Asian origin.
Article:
Ancient genomes reveal origin and rapid trans-Eurasian migration of 7th century Avar elites
ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0092867422002677-figs2.jpg
ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0092867422002677-figs1.jpg
In addition, samples from the Saltovo-Mayaki culture of the 8th to 10th centuries in the Kharkov region, apparently belonging to the Khazars, show the identity to the North Caucasians.
media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41586-018-0094-2/MediaObjects/41586_2018_94_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Also, my calculations on Vahaduo about Balkan populations show the absence of East Asian ancestry not from Turkish, but a good presence of ancestry from the North Caucasus.
Albanian Chechen Kazakh Slovakian Turkish_Antalya
Gagauz 66.5 9.8 0.2 19.5 4.1
Bulgarian 60.9 4.9 0.3 30.4 3.4
Macedonian 66.6 1.9 0.0 31.5 0.0
Serbian 49.9 2.2 0.2 47.5 0.3
Also, non-Fino-Ugric East Asian ancestry is absent among the populations of the Volga Bulgaria region which were not influenced by the Kipchaks.
Chechen Erzya Kazakh Mansi
Chuvash 6.5 57.6 1.3 34.6
Udmurt 10.7 48.2 0.0 41.1
Mari 1.7 49.2 0.0 49.2
Tatar_Kazan 13.0 59.8 13.8 13.4
It is likely that your sample may be associated with the Pechenegs
Are the Turks the same survivors of Mongol Genghis in the lands captured by the Mongols? And if the answer is negative, then what kind of race are the Turks and what do they do in the lands that originally had white and Semitic people throughout history?
Feth ettik
They are the descendants of Seljuks which conquered the region in 1071. So Turks were in Turkey before the Mongol invasions. They originate from modern day Mongolia, southern Siberia and Northern Manchuria. They do have their similarities with Mongolic people as they lived in a similar geography and are both Altaic people but they are not the same.
So, Tuvans are the Turkest Turkics?
When will the Iranian video drop?
It's almost ready. Maybe in a week
@@The_Geographer_Maps🙏 can you post updates on your community hub
Мой народ и кыпчаки это скорее смесь индоевропейцов и прото-тюрков
Mongol, Oirat,Xianbei and Tuoba Mongolic People non-Turkic People
Why do you claim that they are Turkic people
That's what DNA says.
@@keteket
The language of these peoples is not Turkish.
They were enemies of the Turks.
@@Tokyo2905 Bro dna. Okey!
I have Turkic DNA in me from way back of course. DNA match with Yakuts, Altaians, Mongolian, and a Kazakhstan nomadic woman from the 400's BC. This may all come from Native American DNA .
Wonderful job, your video about the Uralic peoples was great and I hope you do another video about the Saka (Iranian) and Tocharian Indo European steppe peoples to really complete the “steppe trilogy”.
That being said the language of the Xiongnu, Huns and Hepthalites is quite contested. With the Hephtalites probably being the most likely speakers of Turkic languages (before their adoption of Sogdian and Bactrian). Again though, many dispute this and say they were Iranians. The answer is probably in the middle.
The language of the Xiongnu however, especially that of the elites is believed to be belonging to the Yeniseian family, essentially Siberian in origin. Although it is quite probable the lay tribesman was speaking a form of Proto-Turkic and/or had Proto-Turkic ancestry.
Finally the Huns are again, not certain, as there is no written source from the Huns themselves, only Latinized and Hellenized names. Many believe they were speaking a form of Oghur Turkic, Mongolic or Yeniseian. With the tribes they subjugated mainly speaking Iranian or Tocharian languages.
My main correction is linguistic, I’m sure all of these groups had Proto-Turkic ancestry but there is still a lot that is uncertain. Still a great video and keep making more
I'm currently making a map about the Indo-Iranians. I made the Turkic map to complete the Indo-Iranian map, since the Turks have some proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry.
The Kazakhs stand in a wedge between the Sarmatians and the East Asian source that shows no ancestry from AG3 or ANE. This shows that this East Asian source did not originate from South Siberian cultures such as Khovsgol, but originate from the steppe culture of Ulaanzuukh, the ancestor of the Slab-Grave culture that were the ancestor of the Xiongnu.
www.science.org/cms/10.1126/sciadv.abe4414/asset/bf62e04f-1203-4854-9f09-c2c31275aada/assets/graphic/abe4414-f2.jpeg
ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0092867420313210-gr3.jpg
Linguistics shows that the first division of the Common Turkic language was into Siberian and Central Asian, and chronologicaly was apparently connected with the displacement of the Xiongnu from Mongolia. The Central Asian branch of the Turkic language was divided on average in 250 CE, namely into agricultural ones, associated with the Oguzes, apparently descending from the Chionites, and into nomadic ones, associated with the Kipchaks, descending from the Yueban.
www.turkceogretimi.com/images/2019/turkdilleri3glottochronology.jpg
www.researchgate.net/profile/Tanmoy-Bhattacharya-2/publication/270000362/figure/fig2/AS:613900487774210@1523376690336/Phylogenetic-Trees-of-the-Turkic-Language-Family-Consensus-topologies-for-the-model.png
qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-f483b8667866ac970d49af4bebfcc24c-lq
In addition, on the Kidarite seal from Samarkand there is the inscription “Oglar Hun” of Turkic origin.
The names of some organs
it's used as the suffix for nouns, “Ak”= ~each of both
(Yan= side)
Yan-ak= each of both sides (of the face) >Yanak= cheek
(Gül= rose)
Kül-ak = each of both the roses >Kulak= Ear
(Şek=facet)
Şek-ak = each of both sides (of forehead) >Şakak= temple
(Dal=subsection, branch)
Dal-ak=dalak= Spleen
(Böbür=scarlet fleck)
Böbür-ak=böbrek= Kidney = each of both red-spots / blodfleck
Bağça-ak>(Paça-ak)>bacak= Leg (ankle)
(Pati = paw)
Batı-ak>pathiak>phatyak>hadyak>adyak)=Ayak= the foot > each of the feet
(Taş=stone)
Taş-ak=testicle
Akciğer=(each of) both lungs
Tül-karn-ak =that obscures/ shadowing each of both dark/ covert periods= Karanlık (batıni) çağların her birini örten tül
Zhu'l-karn-eyn=the (shader) owner of each of both times
Dhu'al-chorn-ein=double-horned-one=(the horned hunter)Herne the hunter> Cernunnos> Karneios
it's used as the suffix for verbs, “Ak /ek“=a-qa ~which thing to / what’s to…
Er-mek = to get / to reach
Bar-mak (Varmak)= to arrive / to achieve
Er-en-mek > erinmek / Bar-an-mak > barınmak =arrive at one's own
Erin-ek / barın-ak = what’s there to arrive at oneself
Ernek / Barnak > Parmak = Finger
Çiğ=uncooked, raw
Çiğne-mek =to chew
Çiğne-ek>Çiğneh> Çene = Chin
Tut-mak = to hold / to keep
Tut-ak=Dudak= Lip
Tara-mak = to comb/ ~to rake
Tara-ak > Tarak =(what’s there to comb)> the comb
Tara-en-mak > taranmak = to comb oneself
Taran-ak > Tırnak =(what’s there to comb oneself)> fingernail
NATURAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
(akar-eser / eser-eger)
EĞER-ISE = (EVEN-IF)
(su AKAR- yel ESER) = water flows - wind blows
İSE-EĞER = (IF-EVER)
(yel ESER- ekin EĞER)= the wind blows and bows the crops
EĞER-ISE and İSE-EĞER constructs are used to specify "conditions" and are often used interchangeably.
İSE-EĞER: means "If ever" and indicates a condition that is more likely to occur.
"If ever you need any help, just let me know." (Yardıma ihtiyacın olursa eğer, sadece haberim olsun) or (Herhangi bir yardıma ihtiyaç duyarsan, bana haber vermen yeterli)
“If I'm not tired, we can visit them in the evening.” = “Yorgun değilsem eğer, akşamleyin onları ziyaret edebiliriz”
EĞER-ISE: means "Even if" and indicates a condition that is less likely to occur.
"Even if it rains tomorrow, I will go for a walk." (Yarın yürüyüşe çıkacağım, eğer yağmur yağıyor olsa da ) or (Yarın yağmur yağsa bile yürüyüşe çıkacağım.)
“Why should i go to work, (even) if I'm not getting my salary” = Eğer maaşımı alamıyorsam, neden işe gideyim ki.
Yeğ / Yüğ = upper, superior
Yeğ-mek > Yemek (to eat)= to add on oneself, to take it in one's essence
Yeğ-im> Yem= provender, fodder > Yemiş= fruit
Yüğ-le-mek > yeğlemek = to keep it on top of others, make it relatively superior, ~to prefer
Yüğ-ka-yer-u > yukarı =(which side is on top) = Up
Yüğ-ce > yüce = superior in level /sublime
Yüğ-ce-al-mek > yücelmek = to achieve superiority in level
Yüğ-sü-ek > yüksek = high
Yüğ-sel > yüksel = exponential , superlative
Yüğ-sü-al-mek> yükselmek = to rise to a high level, to ascend
Yüğ-sük > yüzük =(ring)= jewelry worn on the finger top
Yüğ-sü-en-mek > yüksünmek= to feel slighted / take offended
Yüğ-ük > yük =(load)> carried on top, undertaken
Yüğ-ün > yün =(wool)> the feathers that on sheep
Yüğ-üt > yiğit =(valiant)> superior in character
Yüğ-en > yüğen /yeğen =(nephew)> which is kept superior, held in high esteem, valued, precious (yüen > yen 元)
Yüğ-en-cük > yüğençüğ > yinçi (inci) =(precious little thing)> pearl , 珍珠
Yüğengi >yengi> yeni =(new)> what's that coming on top , what's coming after
Yüğenge > yenge =(brother's wife)> who's coming after, added to the family later (new bride)
Yüğ-üne /Yeğ-ine > yine/ gene =again /over and over > yeniden = anew /once more
Yüğ-en-mek> yenmek = to overcome, to cope with, to subdue
Yüğ-en-el-mek > yenilmek= to be overcome, to be subdued, to show weakness
Yüğengil > yengil =remains on top of, light, weak
Şan= Glory, splendor 單于 > Şan-Yüğ =Exalted glorious
Yormak=to tire= to arrive over someone (too many). (too much) to go onto
(Yörmek)> Örmek=(to operate on something), to weave on top , to wrap around
(Yörümek)> Yürümek= to go over something, to wander around
(yöre=precincts) (yörük=nomad)
Yürümek= to walk (yürü=go on)
Yülümek=to go by slipping over something
Yalamak= to lick >~to take swiping/ by scraping on something off
Yolmak= to pluck=to pull by snatching off, tear off (~flatten the top)
Yılmak=to throw down from the one's own top (~get bored), to hit the ground from above (yıldırım=lightning…yıldız=star)
Yurmak= to pull onto, cover over (yur-ut>yurt=tabernacle) (yur-gan>yorgan=quilt)
Yırmak=to bring it on top of, to take it off (yırışmak>yarışmak= to race> to overcome each other)
(Yır-et-mak)>Yırtmak= to tear= to get it inside-out or bottom to top (by pulling from both sides) (~tide over, get rid of it)
Yarmak= to split, to tear apart= go vertically from top to bottom, separate by cutting off
Yermek=to pull down ,pull to the ground
Germek=to tense= to pull it in all directions > Sermek= to spread it in all directions
Yıkmak= to demolish= overthrow , take down from top to bottom, turn upside down
Yığmak= to stack= put on top of each other, dump on top of each other (yığlamak=shed tears over and over, cry over)
Yağmak=get rained on, get spilled on / to pour down from above
Yakmak= to burn out=to purify matter by heating and removing mass , reduce its volume
Yoğmak=make condensed=to tighten and purify, narrow by turning, get rid of own volume (~get dead)
Yoğurmak= to knead=tighten and thicken , reduce volume, bring to consistency
(Yogurt=thickened milk product)
Yuğmak=to purify squeezing to clean (Yuğamak>yıkamak= to wash)
Yiv = sharp, pointed (yivlemek= sharpen the tip)
Yuvmak=to squeezing thin out, narrow (yuvka>yufka= thin dough) (yuvka>yuka=thin, shallow) (yuvuz>yavuz=thin, weak, delicate)
Yuvarlamak=to round off=narrow by turning (yuva (smallest shelter)= nest) (yavru (smallest)= cub )
Yummak=to shut by squeezing, close tightly (Yumurmak=make it closes inward) (yumruk=fist) (yumurta= egg)
You have added some non-turkic speaker having proto-turkic ancestry. Then, why didn't you add eastern sycthians whose their dna mongoloid dominant and generally coming from proto-turks (Amur River HG)? In your Proto-İndo European Video , you even showed how %100 east eurasian people from mongolia migrated to West Eurasia and the change in DNA Western Sycthians and Cimmerians due to this migration.
-The Tribe of Yemek may be "Kimek", I guess
The East Asian source that influenced the Scythians shows admixture from Botai and apparently comes from Khovsgol and Baikal EBA, unlike for example the Kazakhs whose East Asian source shows no Botai admixture, and probably comes from Ulaanzuukh and the derived Slab Grave.
www.science.org/cms/10.1126/sciadv.abe4414/asset/bf62e04f-1203-4854-9f09-c2c31275aada/assets/graphic/abe4414-f2.jpeg
ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0092867420313210-gr3.jpg
Yemek is an alternative name for Kimek. In different historical sources this people are called differently
avars?
When will the Iranian one be uploaded 🥺
Bulgars had much higher turkic admixture DA 142
Where is your evidence?
@@The_Geographer_Maps Also Bashkir history is something weird here? They are considered as people living near Urals, not Caspian Sea. Nevertheless, you did great work with this video
How on earth do the Mongolic peoples have Proto Turkic ancestry? Doesn’t make sense.
Mongol and Mongoloid are modern terms. The ancient Mongols of Genghis Khan are the Turks. But we do not deny that modern Mongols have the dna of the Turks, since we are nomads and lived together.
@@keteket Mongols are not Turks. They may have lived in close proximity to Turkic tribes, but are themselves not Turks. They are a separate people with a different language and culture.
Çünkü Proto-Türk mirasına sahip Türklerle karıştılar.
@@SerkanKabak25türk boylariyla Moğol boyları çokça karışmış o sebepten bu sonuca varmış olabilirler ama kültür aynı dilleri farklı mogolların köken olarak aynı dil olabilir çinceden çok etkilenmiş deişmiştir belki
Dubo Language was para-Mongolic not Turkic, Hüis Tolgoi inscriptions have been found and interpreted, and Dubo is considered a Mongolian language.
Dubo = Tuoba = Xianbei Tuoba
Please make a video about the Iranic peoples. It would be very based.
Made it about him. There is an Indo-European video. You can look. 😊
I'm just making a video about Indo-Iranians from Sintashta
@@The_Geographer_Maps cool
TENGRI BLESS THE TURKIC PEOPLE
👍🏻
We have no such thing as Proto-Turkic genes. This is a hypothetical word.Some consider Slab Grave to be proto-Turkic, but this is wrong. Slab Grave was a proto Mongolian and Proto-Tungusic culture. The Asian genes related to Gok Turks and Huns came mainly from the Baikal EBA cultures, whose genome was about 80% similar to the Slab Grave culture, and basically the Slab Grave itself migrated to this region from the east of Baikal. So this map is totally wrong.
I don’t understand why there is such confidence, maybe you think is wrong?
Early Xiongnu shows a clinality between the Chandman Saka, genetically Tasmola, that have some ancestry from Khovsgol_BA, genetically Baikal EBA, and Slab Grave. But by the late period of the Xiongnu, as in medieval Turks and Uighurs of Mongolia, the ancestry from Chandman disappears and the ancestry associated with the Sarmatians appears, genetically similar to the Alans of Asia and the Kangju. And at this time a wedge stands between the Sarmatians and Slab Grave. No strong connection with Baikal EBA is found during this period.
Article:
A Dynamic 6,000-Year Genetic History of Eurasia’s Eastern Steppe
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/core/lw/2.0/html/tileshop_pmc/tileshop_pmc_inline.html?title=Click%20on%20image%20to%20zoom&p=PMC3&id=7664836_figs4.jpg
Including the Kazakhs, having a large East Asian ancestry, do not show descent from AG3, unlike Khovsgol BA. Even the Sarmatians had more ancestry from AG3 not originating from Sintashta than the Kazakhs.
Article:
Ancient genomic time transect from the Central Asian Steppe unravels the history of the Scythians
www.science.org/cms/10.1126/sciadv.abe4414/asset/bf62e04f-1203-4854-9f09-c2c31275aada/assets/graphic/abe4414-f2.jpeg
Mongols show the highest ancestry from Slab Grave probably due to additional genetically identical influx from Manchuria.
The accounts in Vahaduo show that the Later Xiongnu as well as the medieval Turks of Mongolia and the Kazakh, Kirghiz and Mongols mainly stand in a wedge between Slab Grave and Kangju. Their ancestry from Khovsgol BA is scanty. And the Tungus Evenki show mainly ancestry from Nganasan.
Han_Henan KAZ_Kangju KAZ_Tasmola_IA MNG_Khovsgol_BA MNG_Slab_Grave_EIA_1 Nganassan
MNG_Early_Xiongnu 1.6 24.4 26.9 16.8 29.4 0.9
Late_Xiongnu 11.4 28.8 7.5 6.1 44.3 1.9
MNG_Early_Med_Turk 2.8 34.2 4.6 5.3 52.0 1.1
Evenk 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 32.7 66.9
Kazakh 12.5 41.4 1.0 3.5 40.5 1.2
Kirghiz:Bishkek 13.7 32.2 3.2 3.1 46.4 1.4
Mongolian:mongol 9.9 20.2 1.7 0.0 67.8 0.5
Yanılıyorsunuz. Donghu geleneği Moğol geleneğidir. Slab Grave Türk geleneğidir.
Proto-turkic culture is originally from idil(volga) and this ancestry meter is definitely not true. Our turkic ancestors from idel were not asians like mongolians its clear
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Turkic where asians mongoliand its clear ...
= anatol not turkic .. anatol is hilinic and Arman and arabic and kard
İdilden gelmiyor knk. Kuzeydoğu Asya'danız
Proto-turkic culture？？🤣🤣Proto-turkic originated from ANA, they assimilated 【steppe herders(volga)+ Iranian farmers】
@@tanhukim9963 neye göre söylüyosun bunu, bu tez batılıların yanlı tezlerinden biri sadece, doğruluğu yok. Asyalı görünüşe sahip olmayanlar Türk değildir fikriyle yanlı olarak oluşturulmuş bi yalan bu, plana dahil olarak türkiye türkleri aslında müslümaan yunan falan diye saçmalamaları da bundan kaynaklı. Gittiğimizde her yerde yerlilerle bi oranda karıştık bu doğru,ama çoğunlukla Türk genetik mirasını taşıyoruz. Batıya göçen oğuzlar burdaki yerlilerle,kazaklar da moğollar karıştı, bu kadar farklı gözükmemizin sebebi budur.
The Hungarians, Bulgarians, And Kyrgyzs migrating from central Russia to else wear, refusing to elaborate: 🗿🗿🗿
Why you showing Chigil as distinct tribe from Uyghurs, you showing Chigils are kazakhs tribe...
When Chigils are one of dominant Tribe of Uyghurs in Southern Xinjiang, they have very Caucasoid features.
kazakh don't look like Karluks, they look Mongol
Kazakhs are essentially Turks. C DNA is specific to Northeast Asians. Slab grave culture is a Turkish tradition.
@@tanhukim9963 Chigil aren't kazakh part never .
Chigil are one of Tribe of Karluks, they live in Kashgar and Fergana valley, they aren't connected to Mongol kazakhs with C2 haplo Tungus
I do not show Chigil as Kazakhs. Just a group of nomadic Uzbeks named Kazakh migrated to the area where Chigil supposedly lived at this time. In addition, the Chigil lived between Issyk-Kul and the Ili River. Chigil is often shown as a separate people from the Karluks, but I have not heard about the connection with the Uyghurs at all. If we look at the genomes of the Karakhanids and Karluks of Kazakhstan, they show the greatest closeness to the Karakalpaks and Nogais, that is, they are closer to the Kazakhs than to the Uighurs and are Mongoloids.
@@The_Geographer_Maps If you look clear to Karluk and true Karakhanid they are much more closer to Uyghurs and Hazara which are Dominantly carry They genotype.
karakalpak can't be Karakhanid, they live very far from it.
Karakhanid khanate begins from Kashgar and then they occupied Central Asia, maybe then mixed with them
@@The_Geographer_Maps You look better genotype, and tribe of Kashgar.
Nearly half population of Xinjiang belongs to Karluk DNA and Chigil is a part of it.
Maybe Kashgarians belong to Chigil tribe.
you better learn history
0:23 I love the history of the Mongols❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤. And obviously I love their cultures, their lifestyle and their society
So many miatakes, I cant even begin
Also the 0% turkic in volga bulgars is a joke
No that's not true. All Medieval Turkics are Eurasian. Including Kipchaks who lived in Kazakhstan and Russia. Let's model modern Turks with Kipchaks to see how Turkic they are.
Target: Turkish(West)
Distance: 0.6720% / 0.00672047
31.2 KAZ_Kipchak
30.2 Anatolia_Center_Phrygian_650BC
16.4 Paleo-Balkan+Slavic_MNE_Doclea_Bjelovine
9.2 Caucasus_BlackSea_Samsun_B_150BC
8.0 IRN_Hasanlu_IA
5.0 Levant_Sidon_1800BC
Target: Turkish(Bolu)
Distance: 0.7747% / 0.00774707
35.8 KAZ_Kipchak
24.4 Anatolia_Center_Phrygian_650BC
16.4 IRN_Hasanlu_IA
14.2 Paleo-Balkan+Slavic_MNE_Doclea_Bjelovine
5.4 Caucasus_BlackSea_Samsun_B_150BC
2.4 Mycenaean_Greek_1350BC
1.4 Levant_Sidon_1800BC
Target: Turkish(Muğla)
Distance: 0.7316% / 0.00731601
42.6 KAZ_Kipchak
27.2 Anatolia_Center_Phrygian_650BC
13.6 IRN_Hasanlu_IA
6.8 Mycenaean_Greek_1350BC
6.6 Paleo-Balkan+Slavic_MNE_Doclea_Bjelovine
3.2 Caucasus_BlackSea_Samsun_B_150BC
These are all Vahaduo calculations. Hope it helps you the understand. Schyto Sarmatian ancestry in Medieval Turkics is not Persian at all. Persians are Elamites with minimal real Indo European ancestry.
Also Turks have upto %22 East Asian ancestry. And medieval Turkics are all Eurasian.
Let's compare Uzbek and Anatolian Turk and Anatolian Greek in neolithic calculation.
Target: Greek_Cappadocia
Distance: 3.3814% / 0.03381362
50.4 TUR_Marmara_Barcin_N(Anatolian_Farmer)
18.6 GEO_CHG(Caucasus_Hunter_Gatherer)
16.2 IRN_Ganj_Dareh_N(Zagrosian_Farmer)
8.0 Levant_Natufian_EpiP(Natufian_Hunter_Gatherer)
6.8 RUS_Samara_Yamnaya(Proto_Indo_European)
Target: Uzbek
Distance: 3.2676% / 0.03267641
38.0 RUS_Devils-Gate-Cave_N(North_East_Asian)
30.8 RUS_Samara_Yamnaya(Proto_Indo_European)
17.8 IRN_Ganj_Dareh_N(Zagrosian_Farmer)
12.0 TUR_Marmara_Barcin_N(Anatolian_Farmer)
1.4 Levant_Natufian_EpiP(Natufian_Hunter_Gatherer)
Target: Turkish(Muğla)
Distance: 1.8099% / 0.01809908
34.2 TUR_Marmara_Barcin_N(Anatolian_Farmer)
22.8 RUS_Samara_Yamnaya(Proto_Indo_European)
17.2 RUS_Devils-Gate-Cave_N(North_East_Asian)
14.2 IRN_Ganj_Dareh_N(Zagrosian_Farmer)
6.6 GEO_CHG(Caucasus_Hunter_Gatherer)
5.0 Levant_Natufian_EpiP(Natufian_Hunter_Gatherer)
And let's model Turk between Uzbek and Anatolian Greek.
Target: Turkish(Muğla)
Distance: 2.2850% / 0.02284951
53.8 Greek_Cappadocia
46.2 Uzbek
Hope it helps you to understand.
Doğru kardeşim doğru bizler mançurya bölgesinden geliyoruz bunu kabul et.
Tamam ama Anadoluya gelen orta Çağ Türkleri gayet Avrasyalı.
Target: Turkish(West)
Distance: 0.6720% / 0.00672047
31.2 KAZ_Kipchak
30.2 Anatolia_Center_Phrygian_650BC
16.4 Paleo-Balkan+Slavic_MNE_Doclea_Bjelovine
9.2 Caucasus_BlackSea_Samsun_B_150BC
8.0 IRN_Hasanlu_IA
5.0 Levant_Sidon_1800BC
Target: Turkish(Bolu)
Distance: 0.7747% / 0.00774707
35.8 KAZ_Kipchak
24.4 Anatolia_Center_Phrygian_650BC
16.4 IRN_Hasanlu_IA
14.2 Paleo-Balkan+Slavic_MNE_Doclea_Bjelovine
5.4 Caucasus_BlackSea_Samsun_B_150BC
2.4 Mycenaean_Greek_1350BC
1.4 Levant_Sidon_1800BC
Target: Turkish(Muğla)
Distance: 0.7316% / 0.00731601
42.6 KAZ_Kipchak
27.2 Anatolia_Center_Phrygian_650BC
13.6 IRN_Hasanlu_IA
6.8 Mycenaean_Greek_1350BC
6.6 Paleo-Balkan+Slavic_MNE_Doclea_Bjelovine
3.2 Caucasus_BlackSea_Samsun_B_150BC
@@tanhukim9963
@@xdd87evet knk illaki diğer ırkların da vardır. Bizim anadoluda %15-20 civarı doğu asya dnası zaten. Hint Avrupa oranı ona bakılırsa daha az. %5 civarı. Ben IE dnası daha çok çıkar sanıyordum. Ancak çıkmamış. Yunan dnasıno IE dnaso sanıyordum ANF ( Anadolu neolithic farmer) dnası ıktı. Haritalarda yunanistanı gösterince Yunan dnası sanıyor bizim millet. Alakası yokmuş. IE dnası kıyı kenarlarında %10 olabilir. Çünkü Yunanlılar ve diğer IEler kıyı kenarlarına yerleşti çoğunluk. Hem biz Orta Asya'dan da taşımış olabiliriz IE dnasını. Çünkü genelde Hint Avrupalılar anadoluyu ve mezopotamyayı asimile etti. Örneğin Kürtlerde ve ermenilerde Türkiyede yaşayanlarında hiç yok. Ama söze gelince biz devşirmeyiz😂. Ermenistan'da ki ermenilerde de hiç yok. Kürtlerde olsa olsa %1-5 arası güneydoğu Anadolu'nun güney illerinde yaşayanların da vardır. Kuzeyinde yok. Hatta o bile yoktur. Kızılbaş olan Zaza Kürtlerde çoğunluk Türk dnası var. Bir de zaten savaştan sonra çoğu Ermeni (en az 5 milyon gizli Ermeni) Kürt kılığına girdi.
@@tanhukim9963 Yoo
@@Sadoyasturadoglu ne yoo
are mongols really turkic?
Theoretically this can be.
No
@Heinzguderian1889what about mongoloid
Bad music + There are lots of mistakes with all of the Karluk Turks and Turkmens in Turkmenistan + You showed like there were no Anatolian Turks in Eastern Anatolia until 1750s this is obviously an error. And i dont think Kazakhs had proto-turkic ancestry more than all of other turkic people like you showed. They are mixed too. The Bashkirs have more proto-turkic ancestry than the Kazakhs.
+ Yakuts have like 1% proto-turkic ancestry but in the video they were shown like they had like 30-40%
RIP step europians.
They come from Mongolia
lots of maps and diagrams but factually total garbage, who did it didn't even know how to interpret genetic findings, sad, for example, it says khazars had north caucasus genome, yes exactly my ignorant friend, that is because they changed the north caucasus genome. it's like saying the english have scottish genome.
Hungarians are as turkic as the English are french ngl
English and french are indo european
@@turan2815 then like the Basque and Spanish
@@bizzleogria spanish are indo-european and basque are isolated
Also hungarians are uralic no connection with turkic
@@scarymonster5541actually they had 10 percent proto-turkic ancestry
@@polis1705 i don't think majority of them have it
Yenisei Kyrgyz Khaganate was so big !!! This video is wrong
Тут показано расселение народов, а не границы государств. Под крылом Кыргызского каганата были не только кыргызы
what is protoTurkic ancestry? this is not true
Doğru. Nesi yanlış. Türk geleneği Slab gravedir. Donghu Moğol geleneğidir.
Mangol hhhhh
@tanhukim9963 more correct upper xiajiadian culture than Donghu, Donghu is contemporaries of the Xiongnu but upper xiajiadian is contemporaries is slab frave
@@tanhukim9963 bu yalanlarda kendini kandır, Eski, Türklerin bir alakası yok slab grave halkı'ile
Slab Gravin Katkısı kölelerde Çiktı, ve Q1 Hiç Proto Türk Olamaz Çünkü Türk dilinin bir ilişkisi yok yenisey halkları'ile ve Q1a Proto-Yeniseic Dillerine Bağlı,
ve Altai Dil Ailesi'de kanıtlanmadı ve red edildi, ve Sprachbunds çıktı ve dil ailesi olmadı,
C2 Moğol,Donghu,Xianbei Halklarına tabi, ve Kazak ve Kırğızlarda bulunan C2 Moğol ve Hatay Hakları'ile Türkistana Gelmiş ve Türkleşmiş. Ve eski Türklerde yok C2 , hep C2'in Autosomalı Türkler gibi değil.
Wow. This video claims that Turks are gods!
All our ancestors were nomadic when they stop to "Tur"so they settelt down Turkic cultur they lost .become land owner means your not orginal any more !
Turks people are hindu or not?
You can find it in video that will be released soon.
They are not indo Europeans at all
If you mean Turkey Turks when you say Turks, Turkey Turks, who are "Western Oguz Turks", have a genetic mix of 25-45% Oguz and 55-75% Anatolian indigenous peoples. "Oghuz" are a mixture of Turks and Indo-Europeans. As far as I learned from a documentary made by a British channel, the "purest Turks" live in Kazakhstan and their ancestors have been there for thousands of years.
@@user-jh8gz1lo4e proto turkic r not indo European
You don't even know geography, whatever I tell you, you still won't understand.
Mongolian Turks feel like they have history guys you're our water😂🇮🇷
Dünya gördü tarihimizi fetihlerimizi İranlıların kızlarını cariye aldıgımız günleri
so many mistakes, especially with uyghurs
And what is wrong with the Uyghurs?
@@The_Geographer_Maps 1) why do you paint uyghur to white when they settle in modern day Turfan and Kashgaria?Do you think when they assimilate tocharianias into our society we became less turkic?Lol
2) During the period of Karakhanid Khanate chigils, karluks, arghu, yagma and parts of Buddhist uyghurs lived in Kasharian cities and Ili together.
3) Basmyls disappeared after 10th century, and they had lived in Komul region with uyghurs, not in Emile valley
4) What is Ili Turks?Do you read in wiki?
5) Chigilis had dissappeared from historical sources after 12th century because they lost their tribal structure
6) Karluks and Chigils lived together in Ili Valley along side with Yagma
7) During period of Moghulistan (14-16th) uyghurs had lived together with mongol tribes like dughlats, churas then they also assimilated into uyghur society
8) Kyrgyz people came to Issyk Kol region only in 16th century
9) Uyghurs also lived in Semirechie and Fergana Valley, even up to this days
@@uyghurbirliki 1) Modern Uyghurs are at 80% Uzbeks and 20% Tibetans. The latest Tocharian inscriptions date back to the VIII century. Since the beginning of the IX centuri Tarim Basin conquest the Tibetan Empire and, apparently, then the Tocharian population is replaced by Tibetan. If this was so, then the Uyghurs did not influence to the local population, as well as the Oghurs to the Sarmatian population. In the days of Karakhanids, the population from Uzbekistan replaced the local by 80%.
2) Isn't it shown on the map? Unless Yagma is not indicated.
3) Who in those years then replaced Basmyls? I associate the disappearance of Basmyls with the growth of the Naiman Khanate. I also believe that the basmyls were located quite correctly, at least this shows the picture from Russian Wikipedia. Mahmud Al-Kashgari, who lived in the middle of the 11th century mentions them.
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3c/%D0%A3%D0%B9%D0%B3%D1%83%D1%80%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%B3%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%82_%D0%B2_VIII_%D0%B2.png
4) I read Wikipedia and I think that everything corresponds to it.
5) Then who lived instead of Chigils?
6) I had to insert not only Yagma but also Tuhsi
7) I do not know the borders of the Uyghurs in those days, although the OIrats was the main population in the region.
8) Kyrgyz are mentioned in the Tian Shan from the XIV century. In the XV -XVI centuries, the Kyrgyz tribes assimilated the rest of the peoples of Kyrgyzstan.
9) The peoples in the border of Uyghuria and Kazakhstan are not shown precisely due to mix population in the region. And in Ferghana there are no Uyghurs in any ethnic map of central asia.
Maybe there are small mistakes in this map, but the main thing in it is shown correct. Moreover, you should admit that you also are mistaken in something.
@@The_Geographer_Maps 80% uzbeks and 20% tibetians?...Wtf man you shouldn't do a history videos after statements like this...
Try to read David Brophy's works about uyghurs at least...
@@uyghurbirliki It looks amazing, but just because it's surprising this doesn't mean that it's not true. Look at the Vahaduo calculations and you will understand that I am right.
Bashkirs remain the oldest
0% for Karachais,Balkars, Chuvashs, Azerbaijanis but Mongols somehow have large Turkic ancestry. Amazing. And all because you placed proto-Tyrkic homeland in Manchuria even though it is just one of the many theories and there is nothing confirming that this theiry is the best one.
Azerbaijan %15-30
Yueban)
This is the propaganda of the Indo-Europeans.
The Turkae tribe appeared in Sarmatia, 450 BC.
The Syr tribe appeared in northern Syr Daryah after 250 BC, while the Tingilng tribe appeared in northern Sogd and western Wusun in 209 BC. While the Kyrgyz lived in Minusink, only the Huns lived in the Ordus region of China.
True video.
He‘s an desperate turk. You have too understand it
türkiye % 10 ? kazakh language russian lmaoo
Why Mongolians have Turkic percentage 😂😂😂
related people but not same
Some Mongol tribes moved west and got Turkified.
Some Turkic tribes moved east and got Mongolified.
Late Xiongnu (begining of CE) shows the appearance of Sarmatian admixture.
Article:
A Dynamic 6,000-Year Genetic History of Eurasia’s Eastern Steppe
Peoples such as the Altaians and Kachin Khakass stand in the wedge between supposed Turkic ancestry and the Selkups, and the Tuvans and Yakuts stand in the wedge between this ancestry and the Evenks. If we look at their Turkic source we will see that it is 25% Sarmatian in origin. By the way, Huns show the same percentage of Sarmatian ancestry.
www.researchgate.net/profile/Endre-Neparaczki/publication/360855400/figure/fig2/AS:1161337816264704@1653895920277/PCA-and-ADMIXTURE-analysis-A-PCA-of-271-ancient-individuals-projected-onto-contemporary.png
Modern Mongols are 15% Sarmatian in origin, and if we assume that they have it from the Late Xiongnu, then it turns out that they are at 60% Late Xiongnu
@@The_Geographer_Maps wow... cool 👍
Some are false.
anatolian parts are obviously very wrong
Neresi yanlış
@@tanhukim9963 türki mirasın tanımı yapılmamış, turkic derken ne kastediliyor? anadolunun türkleşme zamanı hatalı, 1200lerde genotip oturuyor. türki mirasın miktarı ve bölgesi de hatalı, güneybatı anadoluda türki mirası en yüksektir genetik olarak
@@ayberk3888 güneybatı Anadoluda daha çok çıkmalıydı doğru. Ortalama %21 DNA var ama o doğru.
Regarding the Proto-Turks, I chose the most likely theory according to genetics, history and linguistics. If you want to know more details, read the comments.
Of course, the assimilation of the local population by the Oghuz probably proceeded more slowly. And the percentage of assimilation was different both in the southwestern half of Anatolia and in the northeastern half. So the Central Asian component among the southern Turks is 40%, and among the Eastern Turks it is 25%. In addition, the Central Asian component itself differs between southern and eastern Turks. So the Central Asian component of the southern Turks consists of 50% from the Turks of the Central Asian steppe and 50% from the agricultural Iranians of Central Asia, and among the eastern Turks is 25% and 75%, respectively. This shows that the Turks are descended from two Groups of Oghuz who settled in different regions of Anatolia from Central Asia. I already took this into account in the map about the Indo-Iranians.
So, Gagauz people speak turkic language but have 0% of Proto-Turkic ancestry?
Vahaduo shows the absence of an East Asian ancestry among the Gagauz. In addition, it shows the complete absence of the Turkish ancestry among the Gagauzes, which shows that the Gagauzes are Turkicized Bulgarians
@@The_Geographer_Mapscool, thanks!
@@The_Geographer_Maps Vahaduo also shows that Bulgars were at least %35 Mongoloid and also Gedmatch says that Proto-Bulgars had about %37 Mongoloid
Ironically turks from turkey has one of the lowest turkic ancestry 😂.
It's mostly symbolic. All peoples are genetically heterogeneous. "Turkic ancestry" or "Slavic ancestry" doesn't mean much because, most of the time, nationalities and nationality groupings are based on language.
Not ironical. Nomads migrated and intermarried with local people. Turks migrated anatolia with incredible number of populations that changed the region and course of the history. In 12th century, Anatolia is called Turchia(Turkey) by the Latins that support the idea of power of the migration. They intermarried and created Modern Turkish people. Modern Turks have significant amount of Turkic ancestry in their genes.
Turks from Türkiye Cumhuriyeti look almost the same as Greeks. Kyrghiz and Kazaks are the ones bear most resemblance to the proto-Turkic people. 🤔
@@hongdalai2753 no they dont. Kyrgyz and Kazakhs have Scythian and other Steppe admixture, and the Uyghurs have Tocharian admixture. There's no such thing as a "Proto-Turkic" look or Proto-anythig look. Everybody is mixed. Stop talking nonsense.
@@hongdalai2753 in Turkey we have so many different ethnic groups and foreigners, Turkish Tatars, Yörüks and some villagers from some regions have Nomadic -Turkic face, Kazakhs and Krygiz also have other nations blood, Mongolian and russian blood but most probably they are purer than us because we, Turks of Turkey, are grandsons of Turkic people and Anatolian natives. Of course we are not interested in adding other ethnical groups to this case, we talk about Turks that identify theirselves Turks, we do not talk about Kurdish people or Arabian people or Armenian nation or Circassian/Cherkes/Abhaz communities or Laz people, or minorites that belong to Slavic people or other race from Balkans (Albanians, Pomaks, Bosnian).
Including Israel Ashkenazi
That would pretty much be at the 10% mark.
But they don't speak a Turkic language. So its hardly worth it. Unless you wanna put all the Kurds under that standard
I dont understand why those khazars cant just go out of israel if they think they have nowhere to go why not the russian federation and set up an ethnostate like how the tatars did? And why not abandon Judaism not stick to the turkic tengrism roots? Like leave the mid east alone and quit impostering the jews
Why are uyghurs less turkic than mongols and khazakhs. They look completely east asian with wide faces and slit eyes
Uyghurs, unlike the Kazakhs, have a high East Asian ancestry not from Proto-Turks. So the Uyghurs have 26% of East Asian ancestry from Proto-Turks and 22% not from Proto-Turks, and Kazakhs have East Asian ancestry at 56% from Proto-Turks and 3% not from Proto-Turks
kazakh have more Mongols Slab grave blood@@The_Geographer_Maps
Great Seljuks were totally ignored here.
There is nothing correct in this video, the early ancestors of the Turks were not originally Mongoloids
Kardeşim ilk Türkler kuzey doğu asyalıdır. Moğol, Tunguzlarla aynı dnayı paylaşıyordu. C dnasıdır. Amurdan geliyor.
@@tanhukim9963moğolcu arkadaşım türkler moğollaela akraba olamaz dil açısından bakarsan benzerlik yok türklerin ilk çıktığı yer moğolistan değil bu günki hazar denizinin kuzeyi kazan bölgesi artık bilim dünyasında kabul edilen de bu.
@@ulgen1174 Türklerle Moğollar akrabadır demedim. Benzer dnaları taşır dedim. Aynı dnaları taşımak aynı ırk olunduğu anlamına gelmiyor. Türkler kazandan çıkma değil, kuzeydoğu asyalıdır. Kazandan çıkma yalanını Avrupa'ya yakın olabilmek için uyduruyorlar. Kim kabul ettiyse yalan dolan.
turks were never the same as europeans
@joker
But turks try it. They ashamed about eastasien or meditteranian herritage 😂😂😂😂
Kyrgyzstan
2:10
The Khazars Convert To Judaism ✡
I Am Jewish With Turkic Khazar Origin
I Love Khazaria And The Turkic History
Tehlikeli bir durum 🈴
Lol, most turkic people have hardly turkic dna. And they are calling them turkic 🤣🤣
Nowadays people are mostly mixed.
All nonsence makeup. Old Hebrew, Ancient Greek and Tamil has got many proto Turkish words in them. Proto Turkish originated from Africa and settled in Anatolia long before they come to Central Asia.