@@TeoDP7 I think so too, but the US has been bleeding blood and treasure for over 20 years. Real diplomacy seems to have been forgotten. Technology is exciting, but if all it leads to is war being seen an easy solution to problems then that technology does not represent real progress.
Yes, but, "In August 2022 it was revealed by United States Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall that preliminary discussions were being held into purchasing the MQ-28 for United States service."
They can, and they submit preliminary discussions and studies with Boeing to see if this is compatible with US needs or not. If it is, then they might buy it.
Yeah the B1R was shown in a History channel of Dogfights and that was back in ‘07 or so. They should have had this years ago if they were going to use it 🤷♂️
Not to be annoying as heck, but LRS-B is not an aircraft class, it was a project. This project resulted in the Northrop Grumman B-21 Raider, actually meant to replace the B-52 and B-1.
Can the MICV XM30 be fully remote controlled? Noone inside? It says crew of 2 but the gun is remote controlled? Just wondering if that makes it a stationary unmanned gun platform for defence that can become a manned mobile assault vehicle or just what it means by having a gunner for a remote controlled gun
Remote control turret usually just means controlled by someone sitting in the hull instead of someone sitting/standing in the turret. IIRC they called this vehicle Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle but changed the name because they realized it would be a while until autonomy was practical, although it is still a stretch goal.
@@JWQweqOPDH oh ok, thank you . I tried googling but couldn't make much sense and it seemed to say both remote controlled and manned and I thought remote controlled meant not in the vehicle and so couldn't work out how it could be both. Thanks for clearing it up
Russians projected to put the entire crew in an armored compartment inside the hull with the Armata, so I'd imagine they're going to run with the same concept, but better budget to pull it off so it doesn't break down in parades.
Few "Zumwalt's" were completed, and are still in use, but construction of new ones was canceled. So *MAYBE* they go back to it in the future, when they figure how this Sci-Fi Tech Boat actually works.
@@mateuszbanaszak4671 cos cancelled usually means not to be developed and so never to be used and so it's an odd thing to show in a video about what's going to be coming out soon. I get this confused you and you tried to hide it by humour but you failed
Chances are we will upgrade the systems we have, pour billions into R&D on a few prototypes and then cancel, (RAH-66 Comanche). The USS Zumwalt is a joke. It’s like a stealth building. It can be followed by a fishing trawler that can radio it position.
I think it's faster than most fishing trawlers. Also fishing trawlers mostly stick to littoral seas. The stealth features are mostly to increase the odds of cruise missiles missing rather than not being located. Combine stealth features with some quickly deployed smoke/chaff screens and decoys and you'll fool most missiles. That's why the latest cruise missiles are being designed to turn around and try again if they miss, although that gives CIWS a much better chance.
Is it faster than a fishing trawler? YES but for the cost it’s questionable at to whether it was worth it. It’s like the LCS program. It sounded great in theory but fell short and is overpriced. It might work if it’s high tech long distance fight but ifs it’s close stealth won’t matter add to it the cost of rounds for the main guns that are too expensive is it real worth it?
The Comanche was cancelled because the Cold War was over and the proliferation of MANPAADS to the terrorist forces being fought at the time meant that speed was more important than stealth, at least as long as hovering gunships are vulnerable to the mark one eyeball. The reason platforms get canceled is because of cost overruns or because they take too long to develop and the tactics they were designed for are no longer effective. Never listen to those idiots that say war never changes, or you’ll get taken out by a BVR AIM-9x while you’re coming in for your dogfight.
The Chinese are not as open as the US when it comes to weapon developments, Russians on the other hand are always ready to tell everyone about the super duper weapons that will teabag whatever the Americans will field in 300 years, but with the current Ukraine business I don't think they're developing much new stuff.
Zumwalt project has been cancelled couse of very high price they only 3 ships left i dont know this project want to replace a ticonderoga or arleigh class
The raptor got a retired early because of a very high price and tech and theres no such kind fighter jet that equal to f22 raptor why they wanna replace that thing with more double high prices and tech fighter jet ?
You will not be able to evaluate the strength or weakness of a weapon except during wars and battles... then you may be surprised, as Israel was surprised by the weakness of its army and their equipment.. paper??? 😂😂😂
The ships are fine, but all other new gen US war tech is - ABSOLUTELY HIDEOUS! Just look at it. Disproportioned, not looking even remotely menacing. Very bad designs.
О, вот они те самые аналоговнеты. Где-же наш Abrams X? Ах да, от него пока что только есть макет. Я уже молчу про то, что у США кончились деньги и оружие на поддержку Украины, а Израиль вон душат по полной программе)
No it’s called there’s not enough support in congress to continue support also the abramsX is just a demo vehicle the army already decided it’s not needed because there ain’t a big enough threat to warrant the need of a tank that advanced
not really dreams. the valor and the invictus are already approved, the NGAD prototype had its maiden flight, the drones are in testing, the USS JFK has been launched (so will probably enter service before 2027), the F-35 has already reached the 1000 aircraft procured milestone, etc
@@maxvonkrieger9432 no they are not, china is still trying to get their army to modern standards and do not have enough aircraft to fight the US and Russia is focusing all their money on not getting destroyed by ukraine, the US has already tested and flown their aircraft.
This video should be titled "Most Deadly Next Generation Weapons of the Israeli owned US military" since the only wars the US military fights is for the sake of israel.
![Quando Rondo - Grow Up [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/8zFnCg3BO4Q/mqdefault.jpg)
Next next gen unmanned aircraft carrier with unmanned aircrafts. Damn
New Ace Combat DLC looking great!
Can you make part 2 for land vehicles like next generation trucks and next generation C130 or heavylift aircraft
Hail American empire great again ✋
A very interesting and well made video ! But if the US could fix things so that we could all just get along, that would probably be a lot cheaper...
I think There’s a lot, A LOT of problems which are blocking that from happening…
@@TeoDP7 I think so too, but the US has been bleeding blood and treasure for over 20 years. Real diplomacy seems to have been forgotten. Technology is exciting, but if all it leads to is war being seen an easy solution to problems then that technology does not represent real progress.
The us isn't getting the ghost bat it's Australian
Yes, but, "In August 2022 it was revealed by United States Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall that preliminary discussions were being held into purchasing the MQ-28 for United States service."
They can, and they submit preliminary discussions and studies with Boeing to see if this is compatible with US needs or not. If it is, then they might buy it.
But it's made in the U.S by Boeing. Plus i think recently we decided to purchase it for the airforce.
The us is also getting the ghost bat
@mattyice2099 no it's not. There are only 2 that exist, and they are being made in Australia
2:05 that looks like an upside down cross 💀
Sadly B-1R was cancelled a long time ago :(
imaging B-1R with F-22 engine. 😁
@@AmazingVizyou forgot DDG X
Yeah the B1R was shown in a History channel of Dogfights and that was back in ‘07 or so. They should have had this years ago if they were going to use it 🤷♂️
The Cold War 2.0 is on…
the US army is getting stronger
The algirien air force video 📹👌
I saw the john f Kennedy in San Diego last year
Awesome Video! 💯
Thanks 💯
The buff is still standing
How bout petition for renaming AbramsX into Schwarzkopf?
man, i really hope the Valor and the NGAD survive the black hole that is USAF procurement
I also hope that and that the Raider X wins the contract for the FARA program, it just seems like the better choice
Not to be annoying as heck, but LRS-B is not an aircraft class, it was a project. This project resulted in the Northrop Grumman B-21 Raider, actually meant to replace the B-52 and B-1.
The Bell 360 is supposed be Cancelled but I don’t know the truth
You forgot the RAH66-Comanche bro, your videos are good, keep trying😊👍
What’s next, next generation infantry and special forces?
Imagine America's military is going in the year 3000s
Most deadly next generation weapons of Russian military 3D in the next video
Like what? A piece of granite or something?
I read the FTUAS as futas
top top top... congratulations from brasil !!!!
Can the MICV XM30 be fully remote controlled? Noone inside? It says crew of 2 but the gun is remote controlled? Just wondering if that makes it a stationary unmanned gun platform for defence that can become a manned mobile assault vehicle or just what it means by having a gunner for a remote controlled gun
Remote control turret usually just means controlled by someone sitting in the hull instead of someone sitting/standing in the turret. IIRC they called this vehicle Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle but changed the name because they realized it would be a while until autonomy was practical, although it is still a stretch goal.
@@JWQweqOPDH oh ok, thank you . I tried googling but couldn't make much sense and it seemed to say both remote controlled and manned and I thought remote controlled meant not in the vehicle and so couldn't work out how it could be both. Thanks for clearing it up
Russians projected to put the entire crew in an armored compartment inside the hull with the Armata, so I'd imagine they're going to run with the same concept, but better budget to pull it off so it doesn't break down in parades.
La pucha, que manera de gastar la tarasca en estos chirinbolitos, por favor...... y se agradece el video Maestro. 🚣👍
abramsX is not the DLP
Am I not alone who read FTUAS uncorrectly first time?
Nooooo they are gonna replace the f16 award for most modern back to Us after Belgium
Some of them say development cancelled, odd thing to say on a "look at the future tech were making" video
Few "Zumwalt's" were completed, and are still in use, but construction of new ones was canceled.
So *MAYBE* they go back to it in the future, when they figure how this Sci-Fi Tech Boat actually works.
@@mateuszbanaszak4671 that's why I mentioned it to try to see why he'd included them
@@mateuszbanaszak4671 cos cancelled usually means not to be developed and so never to be used and so it's an odd thing to show in a video about what's going to be coming out soon. I get this confused you and you tried to hide it by humour but you failed
1:20 that looks like from transformers decepticon brawl
can someone explain the name of the competition is ftuas not feat-ous
Uss ddgx?
5:47 whats music
а про рельсотрон, стреляющий гайками на гиперскоростях, забыл(а)
Where is DDG(X)
Is CGX-21 canceled?
yes. Due to the cost and the ability of a warship carry hundred of missile is impossible. DDG(x) will replace it
Chances are we will upgrade the systems we have, pour billions into R&D on a few prototypes and then cancel, (RAH-66 Comanche). The USS Zumwalt is a joke. It’s like a stealth building. It can be followed by a fishing trawler that can radio it position.
I think it's faster than most fishing trawlers. Also fishing trawlers mostly stick to littoral seas. The stealth features are mostly to increase the odds of cruise missiles missing rather than not being located. Combine stealth features with some quickly deployed smoke/chaff screens and decoys and you'll fool most missiles. That's why the latest cruise missiles are being designed to turn around and try again if they miss, although that gives CIWS a much better chance.
Is it faster than a fishing trawler? YES but for the cost it’s questionable at to whether it was worth it. It’s like the LCS program. It sounded great in theory but fell short and is overpriced. It might work if it’s high tech long distance fight but ifs it’s close stealth won’t matter add to it the cost of rounds for the main guns that are too expensive is it real worth it?
The Comanche was cancelled because the Cold War was over and the proliferation of MANPAADS to the terrorist forces being fought at the time meant that speed was more important than stealth, at least as long as hovering gunships are vulnerable to the mark one eyeball. The reason platforms get canceled is because of cost overruns or because they take too long to develop and the tactics they were designed for are no longer effective. Never listen to those idiots that say war never changes, or you’ll get taken out by a BVR AIM-9x while you’re coming in for your dogfight.
waiting for the same video but this time with the Russians and Chinese.
Russians 😂
And all China do is try and steal everything.
The Chinese are not as open as the US when it comes to weapon developments, Russians on the other hand are always ready to tell everyone about the super duper weapons that will teabag whatever the Americans will field in 300 years, but with the current Ukraine business I don't think they're developing much new stuff.
@@Insectoid_it's gonna be short
Zumwalt project has been cancelled couse of very high price they only 3 ships left i dont know this project want to replace a ticonderoga or arleigh class
Hi
We need same video but with Russian Army forces!
The raptor got a retired early because of a very high price and tech and theres no such kind fighter jet that equal to f22 raptor why they wanna replace that thing with more double high prices and tech fighter jet ?
Indonesian military vehicles please
Vapourware....
🙂👍
Chinese army vehicles please
you missed DDG(x)
You will not be able to evaluate the strength or weakness of a weapon except during wars and battles... then you may be surprised, as Israel was surprised by the weakness of its army and their equipment.. paper??? 😂😂😂
We need more powerful weapons for Ukraine.
LOL THE F35 (FAT BIRD) LOL
Зеленский:-Дай!
First
hb
Pls pin....
The ships are fine, but all other new gen US war tech is - ABSOLUTELY HIDEOUS! Just look at it. Disproportioned, not looking even remotely menacing. Very bad designs.
the germans really had AFV design worked out in WW2, these look like futuristic wehrmacht weapons.
О, вот они те самые аналоговнеты. Где-же наш Abrams X? Ах да, от него пока что только есть макет. Я уже молчу про то, что у США кончились деньги и оружие на поддержку Украины, а Израиль вон душат по полной программе)
No it’s called there’s not enough support in congress to continue support also the abramsX is just a demo vehicle the army already decided it’s not needed because there ain’t a big enough threat to warrant the need of a tank that advanced
US dreams 😂😂
not really dreams. the valor and the invictus are already approved, the NGAD prototype had its maiden flight, the drones are in testing, the USS JFK has been launched (so will probably enter service before 2027), the F-35 has already reached the 1000 aircraft procured milestone, etc
@@hornet8364 but Russia and China is little bit forward 😂
@@maxvonkrieger9432 no they are not, china is still trying to get their army to modern standards and do not have enough aircraft to fight the US and Russia is focusing all their money on not getting destroyed by ukraine, the US has already tested and flown their aircraft.
@@analien5251 yeah yeah😂😂😂
@@maxvonkrieger9432are you going to tell us about Russian superior technology? Waiting for your wisdom.
Meh
Russian vehicles still better.
why so?
@@thathusk9119 equality and powerful of Russian weapons is way better than American
@@abyss313 give me 3 examples
@@thathusk9119
Not need to give examples it's already clear
@@abyss313 Give me an example. It's not clear to me.
and nothing abou Russian and Chinese )) chanal only about us tehnic
This video should be titled "Most Deadly Next Generation Weapons of the Israeli owned US military" since the only wars the US military fights is for the sake of israel.