I love your life stories, especially the ones related with basic human things like coffee and types of it. I'm a tea fan, but I remember office coffee machines and hot water from the cafe at school. P.S. It's me, blabla
It will be such a different story without dual class. Still a great card, but toned down a bunch. Part of my issue with this meta. Just chiming in on your TedTalk 😅
Game 5 was perfect for sure - didn't mulligan anything away and that was an amazing starting hand. If you mean game 6, that's a little rougher. When I see a deck, there's an entire range of hands you can have - the toughest mulligans are the ones that lie just above average, where you know you can get a better hand, but you're actually likely to get a worse one. In that case, it was a little riskier approach - I felt the studies was able to cycle or present an early game for me, with backstab as support, and the Conman would immediately become a powerful swing card (even something like 4 mana 4/4 draw 3 or summon a 3/3 or whatever would be excellent). Ended up being a little awkward vs. what my opponent played though.
@@DoseofCoffee game five was great, but I didn't think it was right now to mulligan but good to know on reflection you did think it's right. I'll watch it again👍
@@85jacob85 Yeah, it's one of those where I wouldn't call it a bad hand, but also not a great one. A risky keep in such a way, but also felt my deck should deliver a way to round it out. I think a full mulligan for different cards is also a solid play in this case though.
Treasure Hunter Eudora can stop hunting because the real treasure is on the bottom left in form of a handsome maltese man.
I love your life stories, especially the ones related with basic human things like coffee and types of it. I'm a tea fan, but I remember office coffee machines and hot water from the cafe at school.
P.S. It's me, blabla
Part of the joy of streaming for me 😊
I hate conman so much.
Thank you for coming to my TedTalk.
It will be such a different story without dual class. Still a great card, but toned down a bunch. Part of my issue with this meta. Just chiming in on your TedTalk 😅
Hi twitch 🎉
In retrospect, do you think game 5 was a really poor mulligan? Just seems so to me, but I'm no expert.
Game 5 was perfect for sure - didn't mulligan anything away and that was an amazing starting hand. If you mean game 6, that's a little rougher. When I see a deck, there's an entire range of hands you can have - the toughest mulligans are the ones that lie just above average, where you know you can get a better hand, but you're actually likely to get a worse one. In that case, it was a little riskier approach - I felt the studies was able to cycle or present an early game for me, with backstab as support, and the Conman would immediately become a powerful swing card (even something like 4 mana 4/4 draw 3 or summon a 3/3 or whatever would be excellent). Ended up being a little awkward vs. what my opponent played though.
@@DoseofCoffee game five was great, but I didn't think it was right now to mulligan but good to know on reflection you did think it's right. I'll watch it again👍
@@85jacob85 Yeah, it's one of those where I wouldn't call it a bad hand, but also not a great one. A risky keep in such a way, but also felt my deck should deliver a way to round it out. I think a full mulligan for different cards is also a solid play in this case though.
Scam or be scamed. I have only two 12-win runs in this meta. This is the worst result in a two years
I'm not having the greatest results myself either right now. I think it's a lot of us having similar feelings on the meta.
Gustavo
Elma