For those interested i will deepdive into the purpose, design and use of the added spaced armor present on a6 variants and variants after. When this spaced armor was designed it was designed with specific care to both the design of Russian apfsds and the design of Russian tanks as these are interlinked. We start with the Russian shells and their limitations which lead to the design choice of the Leopard 2's added armor. Modern Russian tanks use autoloaders, specifically a carousel, this autoloader design along with the compact design of Russian tanks comes at a very niche cost. Because of Russian tanks compact interior, having an autoloader that was loading the entire shell in one stage became impossible, instead the solution (as with many other tanks) became to separate the ammunition into two stages, the propellant and the shell itself. This allowed the autoloader to fit and work within the tanks confinement, however as size is an issue the length of the penetrator rod CANNOT be increased further without making the autoloading impossible. It is because of this that the Russians moved to a larger gun on the T14 Armata. Now how is this important? Well the penetrating power of a modern APFSDS Directly correlates to the length of the rod, as such the Russians are locked into a limiting roof regarding their shells penetrating power as all of their modern tanks use guns with a calibre of 125mm. Now how does this tie back to the design of the Leopard 2's added armor? The design is quite ingenious in it's simplicity. Since it was known that the Russians had locked themselves into this dilemma of rod length German tank designers knew the upper limits of rod length that could be acheived with the Russian guns. The added armor was then designed so that the space between the original composite armor and the new added armor was longer than the longest rod length possible to acheive with the Russian main 125mm gun. This means that no matter which apfsds the Russians use the same result is acheived. When the rod penetrates the spaced armor it is ensured that the rod will have space within the gap to rotate off axis, meaning the rod will NOT impact with it's penetrator in line with it's velocity vector. This in turn nullifies almost all of the penetrating power of the rod making the front of the Leopard 2 turret impervious to any possible Russian ammunition UNLESS the Russians change the main gun of their tanks. Thanks for coming to my TED talk!
That isnt neccery true, that you cant have a better apfsds instead of increasing its lenght maybe you can increase the caliber. Before the fall of the soviet union the russian experimented with the idea of simplifying their ammo logistics and up gunning their tanks at the same time. This was tried on a t80 which was fitted with a 152.4mm gun. The project was a success. Also they used a the same carousel autoloader and it had no problem fitting the charges and the ammo.
@@Silver_Prussian The point is that the material doesnt matter, so long as the rod is limited by length it will not align with its velocity vector and thus material makes little difference.
@@axlfrhalo when did i say anything about material also the 152mm gun has longer shells and they fit so i am not sure there is that much of a limitation on their apfsds
I was a Leopard 2A4 and 2A5 tank commander in the 90s. Its hard to find exact information on tanks, if you havent served in one. Range of the main gun is a lot more than 2km. The multipurpose round has around that range, maybe a bit more, but its slow and flies in a curved arc, while the kinetic round (really, why do English use these annyoing abreviations? In German its just MZ and KE rounds) is fast and flies witha lmost no curve and is accurate way past the 3km. Cant remember exactly what max range is for it in combat, on shooting ranges it was limited though. While the coax MG indeed has the 1.2km max range. At that range it looks as if the rounds fall from the sky onto the target like tracer rain. The hull ammo storage is indeed not protected and not usable during combat. The turret storage you didnt mention, that one is blast protected, and the only ammunition the crew can use during combat. Thats only 15 rounds (or so). Sounds very little. But then again, the Leopard is supposed to one shot kill any target, so in theory each Leopard 2 wipes out a full other MBT platoon before they have to reload. (or hide somewhere safe and get the rounds from the hull up into the turret) Biggest Con for Leopard 2 - it still doesnt have any active protection. No missile detection, no laser warner, no nuttin.
@@pm7353 No active protection on the brandnew 2A7V. Its the still hypothetical next one, the 2A7A1 that has active protection similiar to what the Israelis got for way over a decade. Some of the stuff that got added to the 2A7V sounds like pure scifi though.
This channel keeps getting better and better! Thank you guys and gals for making these brilliant videos for the public to see. The production values and editing of your videos are sublime!
the prophet mohamd said : The Jews split into seventy-one sects, one of which will be in Paradise(Those who are faithful to God and worship Him alone and muslum by the path of Moses until the coming of Jesus ) and seventy in Hell . The Christians split into seventy-two sects, seventy-one of which will be in Hell and one in Paradise(Those who are faithful to God and worship Him alone and muslum by the path of jessus until the coming of mohamed). I swear by the One Whose Hand is the soul of Muhammad, my nation will split into seventy-three sects, one of which will be in Paradise and seventy-two in Hell.” It was said: “O Messenger of Allah, who are they?” He said: “The main body(Those who are faithful to God and worship Him alone as salafi as al albanian and ibn otheimin ibn timia ibn kaiim ) .........We must follow the truth and not follow the devil and not follow ourselves. your life will change from doubt and confusion to a good and tranquil life
4:28 I want to correct you here. The fins of the APFSDS round are not meant to give it rotation, it is to provide aerodynamic stability to the round, hence the name "Fin Stabilized". Rotating a long, thin rod will only makes it aerodynamically unstable, even with the fins added, which is why it is best fired from a smoothbore gun. Rifled tank guns use APFSDS with slip obturator on the sabot to cancel out the gun rifling.
@@moxinghbian Arrows dont travel as fast as shells, also they dont rotate as fast as being rifled through a barrel either. The fins are there to give stability by means of aerodynamic, not gyroscopic.
@@hjmuhdfirdaus3038 l disagree, it is very hard to ensure accuracy with hard welded fins (like those in an unguided bomb) without a build in control system to correct the influence of wind or air density change. spinning it can surely help. Besides, all the slow mo videos of those rounds are all showing the rod spinning.
The model of the „Tiger“ you have shown at the beginning has quite a „Panther“ turret. At 2:26 you show a 2A4 Evolution and called it a „2a5“. The 2a5 looks pretty much the same as the „2a6“ but with an shorter barrel. But great Animation and explanation👍
The thing about ww2 Germany mass producing tanks was not their problem, they could have done that. But it would have been useless, since they didn't have the fuel for a massive tank army. Also Hitler made the same mistake that Putin did in Ukraine. He thought once his army enters the Soviet Union, their whole "rotten structure" would collapse.
That is a proposal for the Panzerkampfwagen VI Ausf. H2, using a regular Tiger I chassis and a new turret designed by Rheinmetall mounting the 75mm L70 gun.
the prophet mohamd said : The Jews split into seventy-one sects, one of which will be in Paradise(Those who are faithful to God and worship Him alone and muslum by the path of Moses until the coming of Jesus ) and seventy in Hell . The Christians split into seventy-two sects, seventy-one of which will be in Hell and one in Paradise(Those who are faithful to God and worship Him alone and muslum by the path of jessus until the coming of mohamed). I swear by the One Whose Hand is the soul of Muhammad, my nation will split into seventy-three sects, one of which will be in Paradise and seventy-two in Hell.” It was said: “O Messenger of Allah, who are they?” He said: “The main body(Those who are faithful to God and worship Him alone as salafi as al albanian and ibn otheimin ibn timia ibn kaiim ) .........We must follow the truth and not follow the devil and not follow ourselves. your life will change from doubt and confusion to a good and tranquil life
If u would know anything about leopards u would see this two tanks are not those who are send to Ukraine. The one who send to Ukraine are the first leopards from the 90s so there is not a single screw similar. The whole turrent is new the whole concept is new and reinvented so don't compare this to those actual outsourced ones
I was a Leopard 2 commander in the 90th. Sorry, you forgot the most important part of the Leopard2. The Leopard 2 simulators were already in the 90th light years ahead in technology. Took 3 month to teach a crew, only with little time on a real tank.
@@4skintim962 где же наступление Украины с техникой запада и сша. А точно они уже уничтожены не доехав до фронта. А как там patriot ? А точно сгорели одним ударом сразу 5 штук. Украина пока воевала советской техникой ещё сопротивлялись,а вот с западной техникой сразу в могилу 🤣
The fins on the apfsds ammunition actually prevent spin on the projectile. Unlike regular bullets, apfsds rounds will not spin they will tumble end over end if fired out of a rifled gun. That is why tank cannons use smoothbore guns.
@@Aitellythe German leopards are also in Canada and they used their own round called the KE-W which is similarly used on the Australian abrams. Both tanks with the same shell can do the same damage to a different tank However the Canadian leopard was used on the leopard 2a4…. So it shares its weaknesses too In appearance it’s similar to a leopard 2a5 but with the gunner sights is where the a4 is normally used which is also a Good weakness for the Canadian tank. But at least it’s safe to say when Canada has a leopard they aren’t sorry anymore
The turret wedges are not simply spaced armor, but modular system with multiple steps. It is a misconception that the spaced armor is „enough“ to destabilize a long-rod penetrator. I’ve seen it explained quite often in this comment section. I’m going to keep it short: - The front of the wedge has heavy-NxRA (non-explosive reactive armor) elements that work similarly to the heavy-ERA „RELIKT“ which is in Russian use. These basically expand into different directions when being in contact with the HEAT-jet/APFSDS. This causes directional stress that results in the penetrator being deformed and broken. - The destabilized remaining bits of the penetrator are lastly going to hit the main armor. These are nowhere close capable of penetrating it. The main internal armor has been upgraded several times, and reportedly, recently in the 2A7V too. It consists of ceramics, titanium, tungsten and multiple other high streng steel alloys and materials.
Finally 😁 Waited 6 days for this video.... Btw i was thought that video is on kf51 panther tank but I was wrong 🙂 & NXT video on Tata Kestrel armour fighting vehicle pls 🙏
Nice video. I will note that there is one inaccuracy with the tank's steering: If the controls were turned to the left or right, the tank would move around a circular path instead of moving in a straight line.
In 4:28, APFSDS darts do not spin. Spinning is only effective for a shell with length/diameter ratio of approximately 6. With the ratio of 20, APFSDS will get unnecessary moments if it spins, thus they just use fins to stabilise the dart, thus the name.
I didn't realize until watching the video just how enormous the gun on the 2A6 looks compared to the older models, shame you didn't cover the newer Leo 2 tanks like the 2A7v
The leopard 2A6 is not enormous at all with similar size as older A4. The physical difference are the L55 gun, additional armor & CITV. The largest leopard is the A4 evolution bought by Singapore & Indonesia army. Author left out the risk of ammo stowed next to driver which would end up disastrous. Leopard 2A6 armor is inferior than Challenger 2 & M-1A2 by the way. We'll get to see how leopard 2a6 fares over Ukraine later on
Seen one at an military event a few years ago, personally they look beautiful and terrifying at the same time, they are much bigger in person than what you see on TV 😎
Because of what you guys do I really want to learn how to use blender 3D and make such cool animations but I mostly busy with college and exams or lazy. I really hope that I start this May.
Lancet - derived from brachiostomy in Russian. Branchiostoma is one of the few living genera of lancelets (order Amphioxus). It is the type genus of the family Branchiostoma. These small animals, vaguely resembling an eel or a snake, are close relatives of vertebrates. I love the Russian tradition of naming the deadliest types of weapons with the sweetest names.
Mantis shrimp are carnivorous marine crustaceans of the order Stomatopoda (from Ancient Greek στόμα (stóma) 'mouth', and ποδός (podós) 'foot'). Stomatopods branched off from other members of the class Malacostraca around 340 million years ago.
correction. the fins on an APFSDS are NOT there to make the round spin, rather they stops the round from spinning as a spinning movement would destabilize this kind of rodd shaped projectile
@Aitelly for an artillery round it true because it's not Rodd shaped like an apfsds round. And artillery round aswell as almost all the older gunshells from mid 1900s have more of an elliptical shape which will rightfully stabilize the shell with a spinning motion. It's all physics and the difference between an elyptically shaped round and a rodd-shaped round
You should know that russian T-90s tank has got a laser irradiation sensors, and it means that if Leopard2 will try to determine a distance with laser rangefinder then T-90 will set an aerosol jam and the cannon of T-90 will be directed to Leopard2. There is no a silver bullet.
In the abrams the gunner presses a button and the computer lases the target and does all the elevation then the gunner fires immediately to give the least time for laser detectors to act laze and blaze.
A very good unbiased summary most people do not include it's pros and cons tbh that's why some people think it's a bit invulnerable which is kind of not true any tank facing any modern digital ATGM will be at danger whether it is Russian or NATO. The development of Top exploding missiles makes every tanks frontal armor useless as it literally penetrates from the roof. Also thanks for explaining the limited vision some people ask why other leopard variants have optics on the wedge armor like the PL version well that's because the wedge armor actually reders the the places covered by it unable to put an extra sensor or optics which is why all the sensors and optics and sensors of the leopard are put on the roof on with a 360 rotating lens and sensors.
Did you know I stayed at a Holiday Inn last night and watched a social media video about how a NATO tank works. I feel better equipped now and re-assured with the knowledge I need, to be keyboard warrior tank expert now and engage in OPs where I can weigh in with my new found expertise on this topic. Thank social media for making ME, a Leopard 2 (in a vacuum) expert.
Nice Video! Leopard 2A7 is the best 3rd generation Tank a good combination of armour,efficient diesel engine,soft and hard active protection systen(APS) and a reliable 120mm smoothbore gun. All of this makes it a good tank. USA🇺🇲 & it's allies are best and greatest! Greetings from Canada🇨🇦.
The US have upped their game and brought the Abrams Sepv4 to modern standards too. The British and the French are modernizing their tanks too now. I just hope the Europeans increase their production capabilities. The industry has the capacity, but the political will is weak.
Very good video and description of the mbt specs. Top attack continue a cons in the Leo series. Remember what happened with the Turkish Leos in Syria. Thank you
@@tiagomonteiro130 CNN told you about "all gone" russian tanks? Believe in that 😅 They can use artillery and aviation to get rid of this german and other nato rubbish.
@@definitelyfrank9341 still doesn't make it a bad tank. 3 tanks! You show me a tank that's been deployed to a battlefield that hasn't sustained a loss, or multiple losses.
very nice animations, the only drawback is the voice of the person who does the talking: he starts almost each sentence with a normal pitched tone, but at the end of that sentence the tone drops, and the voice becomes difficult to be heard.
@@Joseph-eh4rs Thers is a saying “To avoid criticism say nothing, do nothing, be nothing.” ― Elbert Hubbard Whenever we create any content it's normal for us to recieve criticism both constructive & destructive
@@ln3191 thats true, but leopard shouldnt need to use its side armor if used correctly. the doctrine dictates hulldown position mainly... if 5 head russian commanders want to go full zerg mode with their tanks, then yeah T tanks will be a better choice...
We will try but for some reason the youtube Algorithm likes to promote only Trending Topics which is very bad for Creators like us. We really love the Tiger Tank it was a master piece
Amazing job for bringing such unbiased and objective content ❤ There are so many channels which should take an example. And yes I talking about you, Infographics Show 🤮 Guys can make a video about the Pantsir S1? Here in Germany we would call this air defense system a "Eierlegende Wollmilchsau" (="egg laying whool producing pig" or basically the jack of all trades how you would say in English language). Tor-T2 is also unique for combining radar and launch platform into one vehicle. It would be amazing to see content about those systems.
@@Aitelly lol actually I meant the Pantsir 😅. Would be interesting to get a little bit insight how the missile guidance works. However Gepard would be cool too. 👍🏻
@@Aitelly that's also include massive machine weapons for very short range air defence systems (SHORAD), one of famous Germany manchine, and also Pantsir S1/S1M its one of heavy machine SHORAD , well i loved to mix it between east and west, 😅😉👌 , Bravo AiTelly
Na WWII falaram também que os blindados alemães eram melhores do que os MBT da Rússia, mas todos nós sabemos que não sobrou pedra sobre pedra dos carros de combates alemães. Será que a história vai se repetir? Por que 80 anos depois, blindados alemães e russos voltam a se enfrentar em um campo de batalha, mas vamos ver se dessa vez a história será diferente para os alemães
Немецкие танки (тигры и пантеры) второй мировой войны и были лучше, просто их было ничтожно мало, поскольку они были очень дороги в производстве, в СССР тоже были такие танки серии ИС и КВ (очень дорогие но очень бронированные), но войну выиграли не они, а дешевые Т-34. Касательно Вашего вопроса: надо понимать что и Леопард и Абрамс проектировали для противостояния танкам СССР (танк против танка) и они не пробиваются в лобовую проекцию, тогда не было ни дронов-камикадзе и не было наводки артиллерии по камерам дронов. Сейчас всё это есть, бить будут в крышу, крыша Леопарда или Абрамса не выдерживает удар. Именно по этому сейчас в США разрабатывают маленькие слабые беспилотные танки, они уязвимы но они дешевые и их можно сделать очень много. Os tanques alemães (tigres e panteras) da Segunda Guerra Mundial eram melhores, apenas eram insignificantes, porque eram muito caros de produzir, na URSS também havia tanques da série IS e KV (muito caros, mas muito blindados), mas não eles venceram a guerra, mas o barato T-34. Em relação à sua pergunta: é necessário entender que Leopard e Abrams projetaram para resistir aos tanques da URSS (tanque contra tanque) e não penetraram na projeção frontal, então não havia Drones kamikaze e não havia artilharia apontando para as câmeras dos drones. Agora tudo isso está lá, eles vão bater no telhado, o telhado de um leopardo ou Abrams não pode suportar o impacto, é por isso que os Estados Unidos estão desenvolvendo Pequenos tanques não tripulados fracos, eles são vulneráveis, mas são baratos e podem ser feitos muito.
@@modronmk2289 o T-34 surpreenderam os alemães com a sua blindagem frontal inclinada, aonde os projéteis alemães não conseguiam perfurar, além do mais, possuíam lagartas extra largas, ou seja: foi uma grande inovação para a época
@@helton676 The pz1, pz2 tanks, which were obsolete at that time, and the early version of pz3, did not penetrate this armor. All subsequent tanks pierced this armor from two kilometers.
Shalom AiTelly, nice and good works , 👌👍👍, well hopely for next is from France and Israel about defence equipment video , and Mi-28 for attack Helicopter , also Su-35 Flanker-H for fighter aircraft , hahaha 😉👌👍 Bravo AiTelly
Shalom my Friend we might do the Rafeal and Merkava Tank . We have a few Animations Lined up so once we are done with them we will fullfill your request.
@@Aitelly certainly my friends , well If only , there are ten Desktop Workstations there, each with Quadro Nvidia RTX Sync , woahh , looks like a massive weapon , hahaha
4:30 the 2a6/2a7 with its best apfsds, the dm53/dm63 round penetrates Up to 800 so probably around 700mm at least from 2000 Meters range, 450mm Penetration would be more realistic with older apfsds rounds Like dm33 or dm23
Dear Aitely, I hope this message finds you well. I’m a big fan of your channel and the detailed analyses you provide on military technology. Could you please create a video about the Lynx 120 and KF-41 armored vehicles by Rheinmetall? I believe your analysis would bring valuable insights into their design, features, and potential use in modern warfare. Thank you for considering my suggestion. Keep up the amazing work! Sincerely, Kleyton Pinheiro
The Leopard 2 is propelled by the MTU MB 873 Ka-501 engine, 90° V-block 12-cylinder, twin-turbocharged and intercooled, liquid-cooled diesel engine and very important with multi-fuel capability….. Diesel, gasolin, mixture of diesel and gasolin
Unfortunately quiet a few things wrong. You guys mixed up data of the 2A6 and 2A7. The 2A6 weighs 59,9 tons like stated earlier and at the end it was suddenly 62 tons. You also stated the L/55 can penetrate (with apfsds ) only 450 mm RHA at 2000 which is wrong, modern rounds like DM63 still have over 760mm of penetration at 2000m. Furthermore the leopard 2A7V has multiple cameras and FCGS capabilities. So situational awareness is very good. The 2A7V also has an APU which makes silent operation with low heat signature possible. I’m surprised you didn’t come up with the classic ammo hull storage problem, which was made obsolete in 2007 when Rheinmetall developed new propellants which do not ignite when impacted with shaped charges or kinetic projectiles
80 years have passed and again the German Wunderwaffe, the pride of the German tank industry, are burning merrily in the fields of Ukraine, without even reaching "step 1". It's just an enchanted place. 😉
@@user-ki5ow2hf7i why you mad bro. I mean you have 90% chance to survive a hit from an anti tank when you are in leopard tank. meanwhile in Russian tanks for example t-80 tank it's 50-60%.
@@Robbiehansthe grim part is when they get out of that tank what do you think will happen to them, they most likely will get killed by artillery or mines but nobody seem to mention that
@@Aitelly 😃, nice the more complete the weapon machine, the more subscribers, well submarines, aircraft carriers, LHD, LPD's, torpedoes, rocket naval, anti-ship missiles, coastal defense missiles, whoah.....delicious yummmmyyy 😉👌
@@ASS_ault конечно, от смеха) дорогуша, ты думаешь, я каждому хохлу должен что-то объяснять и доказывать?) Так мне насрать на твоё мнение и то, что ты думаешь. Это же просто понять даже по моим первым ответам тебе.)) Но ты упорно требуешь от меня чего-то.))) Сказочный...
They put the fuel tanks in different places, and in the middle is the ammunition tank, and it is in the front of the tank. This is nonsense 7:19 This tank is a bomb
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
For those interested i will deepdive into the purpose, design and use of the added spaced armor present on a6 variants and variants after.
When this spaced armor was designed it was designed with specific care to both the design of Russian apfsds and the design of Russian tanks as these are interlinked.
We start with the Russian shells and their limitations which lead to the design choice of the Leopard 2's added armor.
Modern Russian tanks use autoloaders, specifically a carousel, this autoloader design along with the compact design of Russian tanks comes at a very niche cost.
Because of Russian tanks compact interior, having an autoloader that was loading the entire shell in one stage became impossible, instead the solution (as with many other tanks) became to separate the ammunition into two stages, the propellant and the shell itself.
This allowed the autoloader to fit and work within the tanks confinement, however as size is an issue the length of the penetrator rod CANNOT be increased further without making the autoloading impossible. It is because of this that the Russians moved to a larger gun on the T14 Armata.
Now how is this important?
Well the penetrating power of a modern APFSDS Directly correlates to the length of the rod, as such the Russians are locked into a limiting roof regarding their shells penetrating power as all of their modern tanks use guns with a calibre of 125mm.
Now how does this tie back to the design of the Leopard 2's added armor?
The design is quite ingenious in it's simplicity. Since it was known that the Russians had locked themselves into this dilemma of rod length German tank designers knew the upper limits of rod length that could be acheived with the Russian guns.
The added armor was then designed so that the space between the original composite armor and the new added armor was longer than the longest rod length possible to acheive with the Russian main 125mm gun.
This means that no matter which apfsds the Russians use the same result is acheived.
When the rod penetrates the spaced armor it is ensured that the rod will have space within the gap to rotate off axis, meaning the rod will NOT impact with it's penetrator in line with it's velocity vector.
This in turn nullifies almost all of the penetrating power of the rod making the front of the Leopard 2 turret impervious to any possible Russian ammunition UNLESS the Russians change the main gun of their tanks.
Thanks for coming to my TED talk!
Ted talk has been pinned to the comment section
@@Aitelly thank you!
That isnt neccery true, that you cant have a better apfsds instead of increasing its lenght maybe you can increase the caliber. Before the fall of the soviet union the russian experimented with the idea of simplifying their ammo logistics and up gunning their tanks at the same time. This was tried on a t80 which was fitted with a 152.4mm gun. The project was a success.
Also they used a the same carousel autoloader and it had no problem fitting the charges and the ammo.
@@Silver_Prussian The point is that the material doesnt matter, so long as the rod is limited by length it will not align with its velocity vector and thus material makes little difference.
@@axlfrhalo when did i say anything about material also the 152mm gun has longer shells and they fit so i am not sure there is that much of a limitation on their apfsds
I was a Leopard 2A4 and 2A5 tank commander in the 90s.
Its hard to find exact information on tanks, if you havent served in one.
Range of the main gun is a lot more than 2km. The multipurpose round has around that range, maybe a bit more, but its slow and flies in a curved arc, while the kinetic round (really, why do English use these annyoing abreviations? In German its just MZ and KE rounds) is fast and flies witha lmost no curve and is accurate way past the 3km. Cant remember exactly what max range is for it in combat, on shooting ranges it was limited though.
While the coax MG indeed has the 1.2km max range. At that range it looks as if the rounds fall from the sky onto the target like tracer rain.
The hull ammo storage is indeed not protected and not usable during combat.
The turret storage you didnt mention, that one is blast protected, and the only ammunition the crew can use during combat. Thats only 15 rounds (or so). Sounds very little. But then again, the Leopard is supposed to one shot kill any target, so in theory each Leopard 2 wipes out a full other MBT platoon before they have to reload. (or hide somewhere safe and get the rounds from the hull up into the turret)
Biggest Con for Leopard 2 - it still doesnt have any active protection. No missile detection, no laser warner, no nuttin.
Doesn't the 2A7V have those things now?
@@pm7353 No active protection on the brandnew 2A7V. Its the still hypothetical next one, the 2A7A1 that has active protection similiar to what the Israelis got for way over a decade.
Some of the stuff that got added to the 2A7V sounds like pure scifi though.
@@theskilllessgamer5795 Die A8 Version wird mit Trophy ausgestattet sein. Zulauf 2025/2026
Да да, хранилище в задней части башни, которое замечательно вспыхивает. Это просто дорогой гроб.
@@АнтонЗахарутин-г4т So you dont even understand what a blast protected compartment is. Da Da, school was wasted on you. Have fun being mobilzed.
i was ´Panzersoldat´ on leopard2 in german army ,
respekt !
one of the best descriptions of the beast.
greatings from germany !
Danke from Texas.
Great to meet a Real Specialist wirth real experience.
@@Aitelly ``Panzer Hurra`` my friend
... in the* German army / respect* / Greetings* from Germany*. Länder und Länder-bezogenen Adjektive werden auf Englisch immer großgeschrieben!
This channel keeps getting better and better! Thank you guys and gals for making these brilliant videos for the public to see. The production values and editing of your videos are sublime!
Thanks 🙏 for understanding the hardwork that goes into it.
Is it true that there is a toiletinside?
You're animations makes understanding so easier for defence noobs like me.
Thanks 🙏👍 really appreciate your support
He made the Tiger 1 model with a Panther main gun 💀
"You are animations"? Are you high? 😂😂
the prophet mohamd said : The Jews split into seventy-one sects, one of which will be in Paradise(Those who are faithful to God and worship Him alone and muslum by the path of Moses until the coming of Jesus ) and seventy in Hell . The Christians split into seventy-two sects, seventy-one of which will be in Hell and one in Paradise(Those who are faithful to God and worship Him alone and muslum by the path of jessus until the coming of mohamed). I swear by the One Whose Hand is the soul of Muhammad, my nation will split into seventy-three sects, one of which will be in Paradise and seventy-two in Hell.” It was said: “O Messenger of Allah, who are they?” He said: “The main body(Those who are faithful to God and worship Him alone as salafi as al albanian and ibn otheimin ibn timia ibn kaiim ) .........We must follow the truth and not follow the devil and not follow ourselves.
your life will change from doubt and confusion to a good and tranquil life
@@anonymous-hz2un 2 month's late but i typed you're not you are
4:28 I want to correct you here. The fins of the APFSDS round are not meant to give it rotation, it is to provide aerodynamic stability to the round, hence the name "Fin Stabilized". Rotating a long, thin rod will only makes it aerodynamically unstable, even with the fins added, which is why it is best fired from a smoothbore gun. Rifled tank guns use APFSDS with slip obturator on the sabot to cancel out the gun rifling.
Also 450 mm is a Joke haha modern APFSDS go 800mm and Beyond
"Rotating a long, thin rod will only makes it aerodynamically unstable"
wait, that's how arrows work, need more explanation.
@@moxinghbian Arrows dont travel as fast as shells, also they dont rotate as fast as being rifled through a barrel either. The fins are there to give stability by means of aerodynamic, not gyroscopic.
@@hjmuhdfirdaus3038 l disagree, it is very hard to ensure accuracy with hard welded fins (like those in an unguided bomb) without a build in control system to correct the influence of wind or air density change. spinning it can surely help. Besides, all the slow mo videos of those rounds are all showing the rod spinning.
@@moxinghbian arrows don't really spin, what do you think the feathers that are often placed at the back are for
The model of the „Tiger“ you have shown at the beginning has quite a „Panther“ turret. At 2:26 you show a 2A4 Evolution and called it a „2a5“. The 2a5 looks pretty much the same as the „2a6“ but with an shorter barrel. But great Animation and explanation👍
The thing about ww2 Germany mass producing tanks was not their problem, they could have done that.
But it would have been useless, since they didn't have the fuel for a massive tank army.
Also Hitler made the same mistake that Putin did in Ukraine. He thought once his army enters the Soviet Union, their whole "rotten structure" would collapse.
That is a proposal for the Panzerkampfwagen VI Ausf. H2, using a regular Tiger I chassis and a new turret designed by Rheinmetall mounting the 75mm L70 gun.
@@KurriKlown Thanks! Never heard of that proposal. Just found that Look a bit confusing in the context of the video.
the prophet mohamd said : The Jews split into seventy-one sects, one of which will be in Paradise(Those who are faithful to God and worship Him alone and muslum by the path of Moses until the coming of Jesus ) and seventy in Hell . The Christians split into seventy-two sects, seventy-one of which will be in Hell and one in Paradise(Those who are faithful to God and worship Him alone and muslum by the path of jessus until the coming of mohamed). I swear by the One Whose Hand is the soul of Muhammad, my nation will split into seventy-three sects, one of which will be in Paradise and seventy-two in Hell.” It was said: “O Messenger of Allah, who are they?” He said: “The main body(Those who are faithful to God and worship Him alone as salafi as al albanian and ibn otheimin ibn timia ibn kaiim ) .........We must follow the truth and not follow the devil and not follow ourselves.
your life will change from doubt and confusion to a good and tranquil life
If u would know anything about leopards u would see this two tanks are not those who are send to Ukraine. The one who send to Ukraine are the first leopards from the 90s so there is not a single screw similar. The whole turrent is new the whole concept is new and reinvented so don't compare this to those actual outsourced ones
Great content and phenomenal graphics. This video was just incredible visually. Very, very nice work!
Much appreciated! Stay tune for next friday more beter video coming
I was a Leopard 2 commander in the 90th.
Sorry, you forgot the most important part of the Leopard2.
The Leopard 2 simulators were already in the 90th light years ahead in technology.
Took 3 month to teach a crew, only with little time on a real tank.
@strange3916 Awesome man .
We missed a lot of stuff here and there.
We also forgot to mention the Bomb Doors as well
А по сути все танки это гроб на колёсах
@@ИмяФамилия-н7з4ыthat’s just a lie, only Russian tanks are like that.
@@4skintim962 где же наступление Украины с техникой запада и сша. А точно они уже уничтожены не доехав до фронта. А как там patriot ? А точно сгорели одним ударом сразу 5 штук. Украина пока воевала советской техникой ещё сопротивлялись,а вот с западной техникой сразу в могилу 🤣
@@Aitelly also you put a panther turret on that tiger model
Great video with very high production values. Appreciate hearing the pros and cons. And most appreciate using a HUMAN VOICE!! Well done.
The fins on the apfsds ammunition actually prevent spin on the projectile. Unlike regular bullets, apfsds rounds will not spin they will tumble end over end if fired out of a rifled gun. That is why tank cannons use smoothbore guns.
Ok great Informative Comment thanks for educating us.
What about the Chally?
@@Aitellythe German leopards are also in Canada and they used their own round called the KE-W which is similarly used on the Australian abrams. Both tanks with the same shell can do the same damage to a different tank
However the Canadian leopard was used on the leopard 2a4…. So it shares its weaknesses too
In appearance it’s similar to a leopard 2a5 but with the gunner sights is where the a4 is normally used which is also a Good weakness for the Canadian tank.
But at least it’s safe to say when Canada has a leopard they aren’t sorry anymore
Great Animation. Good Job
Thanks
@@Aitelly you Too
спасибо за видео товарищи, для меня, как оператора Ланцета, это было довольно информативное видео :)
Братан ланцет не нужен, отдохни, старый добрый РПГ у нас есть. Андрей ДШБ Россия, Донбасс.
😀😃
@@dhba760 Тут все нужно, FPV дроны с выстрелами от РПГ-7, Ланцет, Вихрь, Корнет
...
The turret wedges are not simply spaced armor, but modular system with multiple steps. It is a misconception that the spaced armor is „enough“ to destabilize a long-rod penetrator. I’ve seen it explained quite often in this comment section.
I’m going to keep it short:
- The front of the wedge has heavy-NxRA (non-explosive reactive armor) elements that work similarly to the heavy-ERA „RELIKT“ which is in Russian use. These basically expand into different directions when being in contact with the HEAT-jet/APFSDS. This causes directional stress that results in the penetrator being deformed and broken.
- The destabilized remaining bits of the penetrator are lastly going to hit the main armor. These are nowhere close capable of penetrating it. The main internal armor has been upgraded several times, and reportedly, recently in the 2A7V too. It consists of ceramics, titanium, tungsten and multiple other high streng steel alloys and materials.
Didn't help the Ukranians this week.
@@andykerr3803it did. Maybe the tanks didn't survive, but the crews did. Which is kinda the job of armor i guess.
@@UnfollowYourDreams If they lived, it's doubtful their hearing and brains function well.
The number of handicapped will be a massive drain.
@@andykerr3803 what brain damage??
@@UnfollowYourDreams The concusive forces do damage over time. You don't walk away untouched.
Very informative: 9/10 recommend to anyone who's looking for how a Leopard 2 works
Damn that comment aged like milk
@UsudUsud-ly9q your comment aged like rotten sour cream
Proud to have been a gunner in one of these beasts.
It’s much cooler if ur the person who shoots and loads the shell
So you just bragging about living my dream? 🤣
Have you lost confidence in it after what has happened to it over the past couple days?
I dont think you want to be a gunner now😂😂😂
@@mihaipaul4962 and he is a little less proud
Lancet seems to do the job on these pretty well.
ланцет не может пробивать высоко бронированные цели
@@babush6 , ха - ха !!!!
someone's salty that their favorite villain isn't winning the war
@@AlexeiVorobev who Zelinsky or Biden?
@@asdnetwork4268 the one who's soldiers castrate and decapitate on video
I am always excited to watch such videos. Great edits.
Glad you like them!
Мультики - это конечно хорошо. Вы покажите реальные бои, этого чудо оружия.
Ви вже показали , ми вас всіх уб'єм!
Скоро, на территории хохлостана в виде металлолома))
@@diversantvlg7099 Відшмокчи підор
До первого хохляцкого поля! Там увязнет и утонет.
По факту, пока я ток видел как они застряли в черноземье 😀🤌
Everytime this channel post new vid I'd always watch it first
Glad you liked it 🙂😊🙂
Finally 😁
Waited 6 days for this video....
Btw i was thought that video is on kf51 panther tank but I was wrong 🙂
& NXT video on Tata Kestrel armour fighting vehicle pls 🙏
apologies as we had to make a lot of Corrections
@@Aitelly Never forget that
"no one is perfect"
Everyone make a mistake specially me😅
@@warfootage7890 , 😆 oh bhai
T 120 1981
Huge thanks for people who invest they time same as tallent for a video like this its amazing when you can see it in modern way.
Thank you,for the enjoyable animation, the depth of research, and top-notch delivery! I'm a more knowledgeable PC Warrior since finding your channel!
You are the same with the 2 of us.
Those edits are mind boggling lol!!
Love from india
Leopard + Lancet =❤
😁😁😜😜+ Vikhr + Kornet
Хахаха, точно, смертельная любовь!😊👍
T-90 + Javelin =♥️
@@cold_raptor Comendante + Javelin = ❤️
@@sergush you do know thats a Coffee machine right...
Nice video. I will note that there is one inaccuracy with the tank's steering: If the controls were turned to the left or right, the tank would move around a circular path instead of moving in a straight line.
Thanks Ivan for your feedback 👍
We love you guys 🙏
@Aitelly You are welcome. Sorry for the late response. I would advise checking for this inaccuracy in your other tank videos, too.
babe wake up new aitelly upload
:) Good One !
In 4:28, APFSDS darts do not spin. Spinning is only effective for a shell with length/diameter ratio of approximately 6. With the ratio of 20, APFSDS will get unnecessary moments if it spins, thus they just use fins to stabilise the dart, thus the name.
Yeah, there are many things wrong in this video, including spelling.
Скажи спасибо, что не изобразили снаряд вылетающий из ствола пушки вместе с гильзой.)))
thankyou for the comment and educating everyone...
This channel is fantastic!! God bless you!
God Bless you too. 🙏 Thanks a Ton
This channel is truly amazing ❤️
Thanks 🙏
This channel is awesome, could watch hours of your content.
Glad you liked it. thanks
Fantastic video!
Thanks 🙏👍
Excellent animation. ❤..India🇮🇳
Thanks 🙏👍
these animations are top notch 👌brilliant content👍
Thanks and we are Truly Humble
Excellent description and artwork/graphics! Thanks!
I'm so glad you explained how a steering wheel works, had no idea
I didn't realize until watching the video just how enormous the gun on the 2A6 looks compared to the older models, shame you didn't cover the newer Leo 2 tanks like the 2A7v
The leopard 2A6 is not enormous at all with similar size as older A4. The physical difference are the L55 gun, additional armor & CITV. The largest leopard is the A4 evolution bought by Singapore & Indonesia army. Author left out the risk of ammo stowed next to driver which would end up disastrous. Leopard 2A6 armor is inferior than Challenger 2 & M-1A2 by the way. We'll get to see how leopard 2a6 fares over Ukraine later on
@@jawarakf man I meant only the gun I know the 2A6 ain't much bigger, it's basically the same as 2A5. I meant the gun
@@gn0me420 ahh.. I see, you meant L44 vs L55 main gun. Noted
Seen one at an military event a few years ago, personally they look beautiful and terrifying at the same time, they are much bigger in person than what you see on TV 😎
wow in blender, fantastic work!
Really nice video. Love German engineering!!!
2:15 Rheinmetall
3:49 Rheinmetall you misspelled :P
Alot more misspelling in the video I lost count of them
Because of what you guys do I really want to learn how to use blender 3D and make such cool animations but I mostly busy with college and exams or lazy. I really hope that I start this May.
Great it takes time to learn any 3d Software .
Just don't give up. It's like learning to play Music
@@Aitelly , Thanks I won't give up : ) BTW, Can you a video on Barak-8 SAM. It is okay if you have other projects.
Lancet - derived from brachiostomy in Russian. Branchiostoma is one of the few living genera of lancelets (order Amphioxus). It is the type genus of the family Branchiostoma. These small animals, vaguely resembling an eel or a snake, are close relatives of vertebrates. I love the Russian tradition of naming the deadliest types of weapons with the sweetest names.
Mantis shrimp are carnivorous marine crustaceans of the order Stomatopoda (from Ancient Greek στόμα (stóma) 'mouth', and ποδός (podós) 'foot'). Stomatopods branched off from other members of the class Malacostraca around 340 million years ago.
I think they mean surgeon lancets
@@mihailraskin2912Верно это название из медицины, так же есть изделие под название скальпель.
@@mihailraskin2912 drone
Did you really show us a "tiger" with a panther turret... ?????
@nylanx5737 Maybe it's a tiger with an H2 turret, not a panther turret cuz both turret ring is not the same
@@nylanx5737 lol yes
@@7evenWonders Why choose that obscure design and not the normal one
@@mathiasseli dont ask me, Im not the video maker
@@7evenWonders It was a stock "no upgrades" Tiger from World of Tanks.
this channel not having millions of subscribers is surprising
😌 We will one day have the 1 million Subscribers mark
correction. the fins on an APFSDS are NOT there to make the round spin, rather they stops the round from spinning as a spinning movement would destabilize this kind of rodd shaped projectile
Is this true because an artillery Round was intentionally made to spin from the rifle Gun.
@Aitelly for an artillery round it true because it's not Rodd shaped like an apfsds round. And artillery round aswell as almost all the older gunshells from mid 1900s have more of an elliptical shape which will rightfully stabilize the shell with a spinning motion. It's all physics and the difference between an elyptically shaped round and a rodd-shaped round
I like the fact that everyone just brags about their tanks, when in reality it can easily be destroyed, 30 of those have been lost till now.
Show evidence,like Oryx or similar. Oh,right,it’s fake
@@cosasdetanques007see my reply
@@cosasdetanques007can u see my reply
Yeah russia and the west
@@TankerdogeInvincible fr
You should know that russian T-90s tank has got a laser irradiation sensors, and it means that if Leopard2 will try to determine a distance with laser rangefinder then T-90 will set an aerosol jam and the cannon of T-90 will be directed to Leopard2. There is no a silver bullet.
Good work as always
Thanks 🙏👍
Как говорил мой дед танкист немецкие зверушки страшны на расстоянии, но стоит подойти поближе и они превращаюся в котят.
hahaha😅
Толяныч, 😊👍
Как показала практика они теперь и с расстояния как слепые котята
In the abrams the gunner presses a button and the computer lases the target and does all the elevation then the gunner fires immediately to give the least time for laser detectors to act laze and blaze.
A very good unbiased summary most people do not include it's pros and cons tbh that's why some people think it's a bit invulnerable which is kind of not true any tank facing any modern digital ATGM will be at danger whether it is Russian or NATO. The development of Top exploding missiles makes every tanks frontal armor useless as it literally penetrates from the roof. Also thanks for explaining the limited vision some people ask why other leopard variants have optics on the wedge armor like the PL version well that's because the wedge armor actually reders the the places covered by it unable to put an extra sensor or optics which is why all the sensors and optics and sensors of the leopard are put on the roof on with a 360 rotating lens and sensors.
Glad to hear from intellectuals like your selves.
We realised that we learned more from this community than all the books we read.
Thanks again 🙏👍🙏
Did you know I stayed at a Holiday Inn last night and watched a social media video about how a NATO tank works. I feel better equipped now and re-assured with the knowledge I need, to be keyboard warrior tank expert now and engage in OPs where I can weigh in with my new found expertise on this topic. Thank social media for making ME, a Leopard 2 (in a vacuum) expert.
haha good one
@@Aitelly :p,
Props on the video, it was well done.
Very informative. I hope you can add the Israeli Merkava in the future.
Yes for sure we have the 3D model
I absolutely love your content and the videos are brilliantly done! Thanks a lot for your amazing work and keep up with it. :)
Glad you like them!
Engaging animation work. Keep it up.
Thank you! Will do
They're beautifully blowing up, send more pls.
@@ASS_ault No? I think he clearly talking about leopard tanks I guess
Lol
Definitely very accurate on 9:21
Nice Video! Leopard 2A7 is the best 3rd generation Tank a good combination of armour,efficient diesel engine,soft and hard active protection systen(APS) and a reliable 120mm smoothbore gun. All of this makes it a good tank. USA🇺🇲 & it's allies are best and greatest! Greetings from Canada🇨🇦.
Thanks 🙏👍
You think too much about yourself, in the end the Russians will humiliate you anyway, as always
The US have upped their game and brought the Abrams Sepv4 to modern standards too.
The British and the French are modernizing their tanks too now.
I just hope the Europeans increase their production capabilities. The industry has the capacity, but the political will is weak.
... its* allies (it's = it is)
Very good video and description of the mbt specs. Top attack continue a cons in the Leo series. Remember what happened with the Turkish Leos in Syria. Thank you
I didn’t know they burn so well up until recently.
Duh it got hit by artillery you act people said they are indesteuctable but what about Russian tanks how are they doing oh wait all gone
@@tiagomonteiro130 CNN told you about "all gone" russian tanks? Believe in that 😅
They can use artillery and aviation to get rid of this german and other nato rubbish.
@@tiagomonteiro130 genau das haben die Leute behauptet. Es sagen alle plötzlich was anderes.
@@tiagomonteiro1301 got hit by a missile from T-80BVM, a vd from Russia show it😅
@@tiagomonteiro130 but this is actually what people expected - for Leopards to be immune, but all tanks burn same.
Best of all, this RUclips channel should provide foreign dubbing language support in all its content.
2:14 and 3:49 you guys misspelled Rheinmetall several times
In my opinion, and I'm no expert, the Leopard 2 is one of the best tanks around at the moment. It's a beast 😎
The second best selling tank can't be bad.
So you're telling me three of the best tanks in the world have been knocked out by Russian shovels?
@@definitelyfrank9341 whaaaaaat? I don't have a clue what you're on about mate.
@@laernulienlaernulienlaernu8953 You haven't heard about the three Leopard 2A6s confirmed to have been lost by Ukraine?
@@definitelyfrank9341 still doesn't make it a bad tank. 3 tanks! You show me a tank that's been deployed to a battlefield that hasn't sustained a loss, or multiple losses.
very nice animations, the only drawback is the voice of the person who does the talking: he starts almost each sentence with a normal pitched tone, but at the end of that sentence the tone drops, and the voice becomes difficult to be heard.
Thnaks for the Feedback
I didn't find anything wrong with the narrator's voice or tone.
@@Joseph-eh4rs Thers is a saying “To avoid criticism say nothing, do nothing, be nothing.”
― Elbert Hubbard
Whenever we create any content it's normal for us to recieve criticism both constructive & destructive
Hahah wonderful all done with Blender ! Thats cool you mention it!
nice one!! please do Russian variant tanks in the future for comparison 👍👍
Yes will do for Sure
Russian tanks are more universale in the battlefield. They are better protected from side
@@ln3191 Russian tank are useless against leopard
@@ln3191
thats true, but leopard shouldnt need to use its side armor if used correctly. the doctrine dictates hulldown position mainly...
if 5 head russian commanders want to go full zerg mode with their tanks, then yeah T tanks will be a better choice...
Cool content guys 🤙
Thanks
The Russians say leos burn well
Рососіянці тільки ПОШКОДИЛИ 10 танків, не знищили, та вже вони зремонтовані та на війні
But the T-90 burns better
@@cosasdetanques007That's why you're burning under every comment where they say that leopards are burning
@@Roverphoneoh shut up
Awesome, please create video on tiger tank
We will try but for some reason the youtube Algorithm likes to promote only Trending Topics which is very bad for Creators like us.
We really love the Tiger Tank it was a master piece
Amazing job for bringing such unbiased and objective content ❤
There are so many channels which should take an example. And yes I talking about you, Infographics Show 🤮
Guys can make a video about the Pantsir S1?
Here in Germany we would call this air defense system a "Eierlegende Wollmilchsau" (="egg laying whool producing pig" or basically the jack of all trades how you would say in English language). Tor-T2 is also unique for combining radar and launch platform into one vehicle. It would be amazing to see content about those systems.
We really love the Gepard too will be realising it next week.
@@Aitelly lol actually I meant the Pantsir 😅. Would be interesting to get a little bit insight how the missile guidance works. However Gepard would be cool too. 👍🏻
@@Aitelly that's also include massive machine weapons for very short range air defence systems (SHORAD), one of famous Germany manchine, and also Pantsir S1/S1M its one of heavy machine SHORAD ,
well i loved to mix it between east and west, 😅😉👌 , Bravo AiTelly
@infographicsshow
Great video. Good job!!
Glad you liked it!
Na WWII falaram também que os blindados alemães eram melhores do que os MBT da Rússia, mas todos nós sabemos que não sobrou pedra sobre pedra dos carros de combates alemães.
Será que a história vai se repetir? Por que 80 anos depois, blindados alemães e russos voltam a se enfrentar em um campo de batalha, mas vamos ver se dessa vez a história será diferente para os alemães
Немецкие танки (тигры и пантеры) второй мировой войны и были лучше, просто их было ничтожно мало, поскольку они были очень дороги в производстве, в СССР тоже были такие танки серии ИС и КВ (очень дорогие но очень бронированные), но войну выиграли не они, а дешевые Т-34. Касательно Вашего вопроса: надо понимать что и Леопард и Абрамс проектировали для противостояния танкам СССР (танк против танка) и они не пробиваются в лобовую проекцию, тогда не было ни дронов-камикадзе и не было наводки артиллерии по камерам дронов. Сейчас всё это есть, бить будут в крышу, крыша Леопарда или Абрамса не выдерживает удар. Именно по этому сейчас в США разрабатывают маленькие слабые беспилотные танки, они уязвимы но они дешевые и их можно сделать очень много.
Os tanques alemães (tigres e panteras) da Segunda Guerra Mundial eram melhores, apenas eram insignificantes, porque eram muito caros de produzir, na URSS também havia tanques da série IS e KV (muito caros, mas muito blindados), mas não eles venceram a guerra, mas o barato T-34. Em relação à sua pergunta: é necessário entender que Leopard e Abrams projetaram para resistir aos tanques da URSS (tanque contra tanque) e não penetraram na projeção frontal, então não havia Drones kamikaze e não havia artilharia apontando para as câmeras dos drones. Agora tudo isso está lá, eles vão bater no telhado, o telhado de um leopardo ou Abrams não pode suportar o impacto, é por isso que os Estados Unidos estão desenvolvendo Pequenos tanques não tripulados fracos, eles são vulneráveis, mas são baratos e podem ser feitos muito.
@@modronmk2289 o T-34 surpreenderam os alemães com a sua blindagem frontal inclinada, aonde os projéteis alemães não conseguiam perfurar, além do mais, possuíam lagartas extra largas, ou seja: foi uma grande inovação para a época
@@helton676 The pz1, pz2 tanks, which were obsolete at that time, and the early version of pz3, did not penetrate this armor. All subsequent tanks pierced this armor from two kilometers.
Keep going 👍
We will try our best better Content coming in the following week Ahead
@@Aitelly 😍 we are all waiting for it 📹
Very informative. Really enjoyed the content. Liked the unbiased positioning. Would like to see British challenger and the new panzer. Great job.
Shalom AiTelly, nice and good works , 👌👍👍,
well hopely for next is from France and Israel about defence equipment video ,
and Mi-28 for attack Helicopter , also Su-35 Flanker-H for fighter aircraft , hahaha 😉👌👍
Bravo AiTelly
Shalom my Friend we might do the Rafeal and Merkava Tank .
We have a few Animations Lined up so once we are done with them we will fullfill your request.
@@Aitelly certainly my friends , well If only , there are ten Desktop Workstations there, each with Quadro Nvidia RTX Sync ,
woahh , looks like a massive weapon , hahaha
4:30 the 2a6/2a7 with its best apfsds, the dm53/dm63 round penetrates Up to 800 so probably around 700mm at least from 2000 Meters range, 450mm Penetration would be more realistic with older apfsds rounds Like dm33 or dm23
... its* best APFSDS (it's = it is)
My Bad, thanks for the correctoon
@@duckstar347 DM73 is 800mm
And DM63 700mm
Dear Aitely,
I hope this message finds you well. I’m a big fan of your channel and the detailed analyses you provide on military technology. Could you please create a video about the Lynx 120 and KF-41 armored vehicles by Rheinmetall? I believe your analysis would bring valuable insights into their design, features, and potential use in modern warfare.
Thank you for considering my suggestion. Keep up the amazing work!
Sincerely,
Kleyton Pinheiro
Bro next please many types frigate, destroyer, diesel attack submarine, nuclear attack submarine, nuclear submarine, crusier, anti ship missile, ballistic missile, cruise missile, hypersonic avangard, aster 30 & 45, ICBM & SLBM, Rafael & Typhoon jet fighter, turkish kizilelma & Akinci. Finally I love your greatest intelligent video ❤️💛💙 . Love from Bangladesh 🇧🇩
Ok
Ultimate informative video, salute to your hard work
Thanks 🙏👍
The Leopard 2 is propelled by the MTU MB 873 Ka-501 engine, 90° V-block 12-cylinder, twin-turbocharged and intercooled, liquid-cooled diesel engine and very important with multi-fuel capability….. Diesel, gasolin, mixture of diesel and gasolin
what you do, is was amazing, awesome, so deatailed
Thanks 🙏👍
Well done. Great animation and solid information.
Glad you liked it!
Very nice video, keep it up
Thanks 🙏👍
We saw that Leopards 2-A6 are burning in the fields of Zaporozhye from ATGMs no worse than T-72
Can't wait to see Abram burn too
Just like how Ukraine recaptured Blahodatne 🥲
The challanger will be burned soon
@@theflipeechestlanjao7754 after 2 weeks, there are still only 3 villages and 1 farm.
@theblyatman8907 yeah.
15 T-90M (including non-combat losses, according to Ukrainian data) for 1.5 years.
6 confirmed lost Leopard2 in 1 week.
that was a very nice video please make a video about t14 armata
Surely will do it
Leopard looks so awesome even when it's in flames. 🔥😂
Two leopards burned anothers were disabled but what if they were russian tank?
Thank you for the informative video
Always welcome
MQ-9 Reaper..... It can be a very wonderful topic ,
And that makes me very curious . 🧡😊💫
Yes we can thinking of hiring more animators to get more videos out in the next 5 months.
Unfortunately quiet a few things wrong. You guys mixed up data of the 2A6 and 2A7. The 2A6 weighs 59,9 tons like stated earlier and at the end it was suddenly 62 tons. You also stated the L/55 can penetrate (with apfsds ) only 450 mm RHA at 2000 which is wrong, modern rounds like DM63 still have over 760mm of penetration at 2000m. Furthermore the leopard 2A7V has multiple cameras and FCGS capabilities. So situational awareness is very good. The 2A7V also has an APU which makes silent operation with low heat signature possible. I’m surprised you didn’t come up with the classic ammo hull storage problem, which was made obsolete in 2007 when Rheinmetall developed new propellants which do not ignite when impacted with shaped charges or kinetic projectiles
Nice video all shit should be done like your video, one picture saves 1000 of words.
Thanks 😋👍
80 years have passed and again the German Wunderwaffe, the pride of the German tank industry, are burning merrily in the fields of Ukraine, without even reaching "step 1". It's just an enchanted place. 😉
At least when they get destroyed or disabled they don't cook the crew like russian tanks
@@Robbiehans you can see so well from your sofa, as in Russian tanks, and as in leopards? 🤡
@@user-ki5ow2hf7i why you mad bro.
I mean you have 90% chance to survive a hit from an anti tank when you are in leopard tank. meanwhile in Russian tanks for example t-80 tank it's 50-60%.
@@Robbiehansthe grim part is when they get out of that tank what do you think will happen to them, they most likely will get killed by artillery or mines but nobody seem to mention that
@@rajaydon1893 this is very rare in tank warfare. tank is not personal carrier
Good one 👌
Please give a video of Mig 21
Will do for Sure
Please make one About T90M
Coming soon just give us time . We are trying to understand the Engineering behind the Auto Loader.
I love your detailed videos!!! Please do one of the K-2 Black Panther
Would you be doing any Naval warships?
Both Modern and past
Yes we can do it.
@@Aitelly 😃, nice
the more complete the weapon machine, the more subscribers, well submarines, aircraft carriers, LHD, LPD's, torpedoes, rocket naval, anti-ship missiles, coastal defense missiles, whoah.....delicious yummmmyyy 😉👌
Nice video love from 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳 india
Can we see a video about the T90M ?
Yes
Thanks for the information and interesting channel. I hope a video about b2 spirit and its engine.
Yes will do for Sure
Уже есть реальное видео поражения леопарда ланцетом))) можете графику поменять на него)))
@@ASS_ault ну да, ну да...
Пусть сгорел, но не разлетелся в клочья же... Да?)))
@@ASS_ault ну, конечно, не сгорел и даже дальше воевать поехал аж на Москву, так и есть...
@@ASS_ault гуглом пользоваться разучился?
@@ASS_ault ну правильно, он же на Москву поехал) леопард же никак нельзя уничтожить, он - имба)
@@ASS_ault конечно, от смеха) дорогуша, ты думаешь, я каждому хохлу должен что-то объяснять и доказывать?) Так мне насрать на твоё мнение и то, что ты думаешь.
Это же просто понять даже по моим первым ответам тебе.)) Но ты упорно требуешь от меня чего-то.)))
Сказочный...
3M more for Germán quality , Worth It , every cent... 👌🏼
They put the fuel tanks in different places, and in the middle is the ammunition tank, and it is in the front of the tank. This is nonsense 7:19 This tank is a bomb
Very nice video ! Can you do a video for the Leclerc Tank ? Thanks !