Dear Professor, I ran a CTA Analysis and found that 4 of 9 cases have p-value less than 0.05, meaning 44% of all combinations and led to a formative model. Is this enough to say that the model had to be formative? I'm asking you because If I am looking at the CI low adj and CI up adj most of the correlations are -+, meaning that the model has to be reflective. Thank you very much!
Another Great content from you Prof
Thank you once more for your contribution
Dear Professor,
I ran a CTA Analysis and found that 4 of 9 cases have p-value less than 0.05, meaning 44% of all combinations and led to a formative model. Is this enough to say that the model had to be formative? I'm asking you because If I am looking at the CI low adj and CI up adj most of the correlations are -+, meaning that the model has to be reflective. Thank you very much!