F-22 Vs. F-35 Dogfight: Who would win?!?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 10 апр 2023
  • The F-22 Raptor is the stealthiest fighter ever to fly and it comes to the fight with true hot rod performance thanks to a pair of afterburning turbofan engines that pump out a combined 70,000 pounds of thrust under afterburner.
    But what the F-35 lacks in raw power, it makes up for with superior technology, including Infrared Search and Track capabilities.
    So who wins this fight?
    #f22 #f35 #dogfight #airpower #airforce #usmilitary #military #fighterjets #aircraft #airpower #shorts #tech #technology

Комментарии • 555

  • @Milvus_In_Excelsis
    @Milvus_In_Excelsis Год назад +608

    Finally someone gets it.
    The F-22 is getting a 10 billion dollar upgrade to get on par with the F-35 situation awareness.

    • @aviationist1018
      @aviationist1018 Год назад +30

      It is? If so LETS GO!!!!!

    • @Typexviiib
      @Typexviiib Год назад +33

      The f35 is getting a 15 billion dollar upgrade to keep it more advanced than the f22 over the same 10 year period.

    • @Milvus_In_Excelsis
      @Milvus_In_Excelsis Год назад +22

      @@Typexviiib that upgrade is too deal with future threats, threats that will be present long after the F-22 retired.
      It is also going to get a new air to air missle that is small enough so it can carry 8 missles internally.

    • @Typexviiib
      @Typexviiib Год назад +4

      @@Milvus_In_Excelsis indeed, but both are scheduled for completion in the early 2030s, meaning the f22 will never catch up to the f35 in tech. It will only meet 2020 levels of f35 tech in the 2030s. By mid 2030s NGAD should be online and f22 will be parked in the desert.

    • @Sithvulcan76
      @Sithvulcan76 Год назад +4

      The narrative I keep hearing is the F22 cannot be upgraded easily at least not to the level of the F35.

  • @painthuret
    @painthuret Год назад +441

    The question should be can the F35 detect the raptor before the raptor detects it and engages it.

    • @Andromedon777
      @Andromedon777 Год назад +47

      Yes. f-22 can be spotted with IRST still. F-35 likely would win BVR from what I've heard

    • @MrDJAK777
      @MrDJAK777 Год назад +14

      Raptor has smaller RCS and larger longer range radar, and it's munitions likely have a bit higher PK due to kinematic advantage/ launch parameters. The only grey zone is the DAS range vs raptor IR sig reduction and whether or not it can que BVR/fox3s for the f35 if not it's f22 all day if it can it's a toss up (though f22 has its own DAS now/soon™) at range. Close range it's likely f35 10/10 unless they get to guns.

    • @lilMungo
      @lilMungo Год назад +6

      ​@@Andromedon777 irst dosent help bc it can't guide radar missles and irst isn't really gonna see further then 30miles

    • @Andromedon777
      @Andromedon777 Год назад +1

      @@lilMungo I'm sure it has further range. But interesting it doesn't guide radar guided missiles. Do AIM-9 even have enough fuel?

    • @Milvus_In_Excelsis
      @Milvus_In_Excelsis Год назад +11

      @@lilMungo what is the Raptor going to use to detect the F-35 beyond 30 miles?
      The F-35 has the first see, first shot advantage.

  • @TylerOrchowski
    @TylerOrchowski Год назад +97

    Different mission sets, and I'm glad we have both.

    • @Wildboy789789
      @Wildboy789789 6 месяцев назад +1

      Exactly right, situational availability makes the US the best military on earth, its all communication and logistics

    • @klex666
      @klex666 4 месяца назад

      Hey sir, can you please explain me the differences for what situation what jet is? thank you!

  • @TeenTeenFpv
    @TeenTeenFpv Год назад +71

    If they ever found each other, radars off, it would be F-22 all the way. Both would be flying with active radar off, so passive radar wouldn't do a thing

    • @Typexviiib
      @Typexviiib Год назад +8

      F35 has much better irst and much better targeting angles in the likely event the planes don't approach each other nose to nose.

    • @TeenTeenFpv
      @TeenTeenFpv Год назад

      @@Typexviiib IRIS is about thr same range as the human eye

    • @galexymitzelplik9560
      @galexymitzelplik9560 Год назад +7

      The F35 was built specifically for radar, networking, and technology. Take that away then sure, f22 wins in a dogfight.

    • @dondelchulia3189
      @dondelchulia3189 Год назад

      @@TeenTeenFpv the irst the Russians used 30 years ago is good for about 20-30 miles. Most modern ones on planes like the EF-2000 are said to be good out to 50 miles. The F-35 would be limited since the F-22 has a reduced thermal signature coating and its irst has a stealth housing, but it could probably provide a firing solution for a 9x within 10 miles

    • @TeenTeenFpv
      @TeenTeenFpv Год назад +1

      @@dondelchulia3189 again within range of an eye ball

  • @sidiqramadhan3873
    @sidiqramadhan3873 Год назад +23

    Please discuss the F22 Raptor vs China Air Balloon and its specifications

  • @nyyommm9640
    @nyyommm9640 Год назад +214

    You gonna ask this question and not follow up with a 20 minute DCS session with commentary? Amateur hour…

    • @Andromedon777
      @Andromedon777 Год назад +2

      LMFAO

    • @astrixau8928
      @astrixau8928 Год назад +4

      DCS doesn’t even have a accurate F-22 flight model specially not avionics suite. It’s just a used created skin.

    • @Andromedon777
      @Andromedon777 Год назад +1

      @@astrixau8928 It has an F-15 radar, so not bad. And it does implement stealth

    • @rowdyace5719
      @rowdyace5719 Год назад +5

      @@astrixau8928 it’s not a skin it’s a mod, and considering how much is classified and the limits of dcs, having used the mod myself, I can say that it’s a very good mod

    • @appa609
      @appa609 Год назад

      ​@@astrixau8928 The avionics stuff is fairly irrelevant for a bfm dogfight. Everyone can see and lock everyone else. The F-35's HMD and DAS will make it easier to maintain visual and lock off boresight. But it's largely a moot point because the F-22 will get in the control zone in one and a half turns and finish the fight with guns.

  • @azeezosho9459
    @azeezosho9459 Год назад +55

    I think it’s no contest, one’s built to fight, the other is built to do everything. Obviously the fighter will win

    • @kenichitamagusuku3194
      @kenichitamagusuku3194 8 месяцев назад +1

      Okay but was it build to eject the pilot on a clear sunny day flying at thousand feet and crash 50 miles away when autopilot is engaged too. I think I’ll skip that function

    • @mmurmurjohnson2368
      @mmurmurjohnson2368 7 месяцев назад +5

      F-35 designed to check e-mail 😆

    • @Lerppunen
      @Lerppunen 6 месяцев назад +1

      F-35 would win against F-22.

  • @curtisblanco4029
    @curtisblanco4029 Год назад +140

    The F-35 can shoot and kill opponents that it isn't pointed towards. This is a big advantage too.

    • @luigimrlgaming9484
      @luigimrlgaming9484 Год назад +3

      Thus increasing RCS

    • @thecommentator3732
      @thecommentator3732 Год назад

      ​@@luigimrlgaming9484 That does not make any fucking sense

    • @sethboyd9931
      @sethboyd9931 Год назад +5

      So can the raptor..

    • @thecommentator3732
      @thecommentator3732 Год назад +24

      @@sethboyd9931 The F-22 does not have an HMDS like the the F-35 lol

    • @litkeys3497
      @litkeys3497 Год назад +8

      ​@@sethboyd9931 no, it can't. Raptor lacks the DAS so it has to be facing it's opponent to get a missile lock. F35 can lock on & fire at a target from any direction. No need to do fancy maneuvering then

  • @aceofaces1506
    @aceofaces1506 Год назад +49

    In a dogfight specifically it’s the f22 all day. Multiple reasons, it’s more maneuverable, a better energy fighter but it’s also able to dump all its energy like a flanker. And it can carry fox 2 missiles in its stealth configuration, unlike the f35. I feel that alone leads to an f22 win

    • @suchagoodyoutubename8987
      @suchagoodyoutubename8987 Год назад +8

      Dogfight yes. Bvr no

    • @bonedoc4556
      @bonedoc4556 Год назад +1

      ​@Such a good youtube name why do you say that? They're both armed with the same missle.
      22 can shoot and scoot better just super cruising. Not that either would have an easy time getting a lock.

    • @thecommentator3732
      @thecommentator3732 Год назад +2

      Brotha its a dogfight not a BVR fighter you dont need to be stealthy in a dogfight

    • @aceofaces1506
      @aceofaces1506 Год назад +2

      @@thecommentator3732 well obviously, but look at it like this
      If you’re sending the f35 into an airspace where air superiority isn’t achieved, with the idea of getting it, you’d send it in stealth config obviously. Well that means no sidewinders. That also means no dogfights unless you’re in the Air Force version
      Conversely, the f22 can carry sidewinders in a realistic loadout situation

    • @thecommentator3732
      @thecommentator3732 Год назад +1

      @@aceofaces1506 You do realize the 9X has stealth coating right?
      Do you have any idea why the 9X pylons on the Fat Amy is a bit angled?

  • @cmacmcd
    @cmacmcd Год назад +29

    Slight correction: The YF23 was the stealthiest fighter to ever fly. The F22 is the stealthiest to ever enter service

    • @Asghaad
      @Asghaad Год назад +2

      YF23 was better than the FYF-22 in almost every possible metric
      but it wasnt conventional enough for morons deciding that for stealth fighter its more important to have MARGINALLY USEFUL thrust vectoring rather than better stealth, speed, range, endurance ...

    • @stephenwest6738
      @stephenwest6738 Год назад +1

      ​@@Asghaad the companies involved had more to do with the selection of the F-22 over the F-23.

    • @Asghaad
      @Asghaad Год назад +3

      @Eastside Azskelad the difference in maneuverability was marginal, the whole thrust vectoring gimmick is exactly that - a gimmick you will NEVER use unless you somewhere seriously screwed up to get into a near stall WVR dogfight ...
      meanwhile the YF23 was stealthier, FASTER, had much higher supercruise (1.79 mach without afterburner is INSANE ...) speed, endurance and had actively cooled exhaust making it much better at IR stealth than F-22 ...
      YF-23 was BY FAR the superior platform for anything other than extreme close range dogfight and even then it is no slouch (has much lower wing loading than F-22 because it has higher wing area and is SIX TONS LIGHTER EMPTY than Raptor ...)
      the role of a stealth fighter is long range BVR interception not WVR dogfighting and even for that YF-23 would be superior to any fighter in the world just like F-22 is

    • @Xephocon
      @Xephocon 11 месяцев назад

      @@AsghaadWere you on the evaluation team? If not then stfu. If they have selected the YF-23 instead, idiots like you would then rave about the YF-22 and how it was the better fighter.

    • @Dr.Westside
      @Dr.Westside 6 месяцев назад +1

      ​@@eastsideazskelad3093Northrop Grumman was in the middle of massive cost overruns and missed deadlines with the B-2 . Lockheed had just built and delivered multiple other aircraft with relatively no issues including the F-117 . The F-117 was built on a fixed price contract . Uncle Sam thought Lockheed was the better choice . The fact that Lockheed was the pioneer of stealth with the SR-71 and had more experience with stealth aircraft , didn't hurt either .

  • @firstlast9813
    @firstlast9813 Год назад +6

    The missiles can turn faster than the raptor and the F35 can deploy a decoy. Unless it's guns only, they're even.

    • @deadshot4245
      @deadshot4245 Год назад

      you know nothing of the jets i see guns only thinking the f35 could a solution lol. an f22 flown at max envelope would get nose on before a f35 could get halfway through its circle not even close match both are awesome jets but they are no where near the same

  • @ChIGuY-town22_
    @ChIGuY-town22_ 8 месяцев назад +2

    F-22 "Would you intercept me?"

  • @tempist6970
    @tempist6970 Год назад +7

    F22 wins despite the f35 being my favourite😢

    • @mutingp
      @mutingp 8 месяцев назад

      I don't think so

    • @tempist6970
      @tempist6970 8 месяцев назад

      @@mutingp what do you mean 😆

    • @mutingp
      @mutingp 8 месяцев назад

      @@tempist6970 hmd

    • @mutingp
      @mutingp 7 месяцев назад

      ​@@tempist6970JHMCS II is light weight, with minimal installation footprint, delivering new levels of logistics and operational savings.
      Among its significant features:
      NVCD (night symbology) and click-on Night Vision Goggles (NVG) utilizing the
      standard NVG mounting bracket
      Improved helmet comfort and center of gravity (CG)
      Safe, proven visor projection
      20-degree circular field of view (FOV)
      High accuracy, hybrid optical/inertial tracker with unlimited motion box and
      high redundancy
      Multi-sensor video presentation
      Virtual training display support
      JHMCS II can be integrated with CanaryTM, a breakthrough solution, capable of identifying and warning prior to hypoxia and [GLOC?] events or call for automatic aircraft recovery in case of the pilot’s loss of consciousness.

    • @mutingp
      @mutingp 7 месяцев назад

      ​@@tempist6970The JHMCS provides the pilot with “first look, first shoot” high off-boresight weapons engagement capabilities. The system, also available in a night configuration, enables the pilot to accurately cue onboard weapons and sensors against enemy aircraft and ground targets without the need to aggressively turn the aircraft or place the target in the Head-Up Display (HUD) for designation.
      Critical information and symbology such as targeting cues and aircraft performance parameters are graphically displayed directly on the pilot’s visor. Through RCEVS, most frontline U.S. fighters (F-16, F/A-18 and F-15) are being equipped with the JHMCS, which are currently operationally proven in over 20 air forces worldwide.

  • @iliafrumkin5964
    @iliafrumkin5964 Год назад +3

    Please forgive me if it's a stupid question, but it says in the title it's a dogfight. And do all these sensors and radars mean that much in the dogfight? Isn't dogfight a visual range fight?

    • @DARTHBLUNT713
      @DARTHBLUNT713 Год назад

      Yes dogfights are within visual range fighting

    • @iliafrumkin5964
      @iliafrumkin5964 Год назад +1

      @DARTHBLUNT420 so in a dogfight it's not about sensors and radars, but more about airframe, agility and power? And if it is than F22 exceeds F35 on these parameters.

    • @DARTHBLUNT713
      @DARTHBLUNT713 Год назад

      @@iliafrumkin5964 it is all the above you mention put together and it all boiled down to the pilots

    • @Typexviiib
      @Typexviiib Год назад +3

      ​@@iliafrumkin5964 the f35 turns the old emt concept on its head though, because it can engage targets pretty much in a 360 degree sphere instead of a 90 degree cone. It becomes more a question of missile range and cep chance rather than locking.
      Also, just because you're wvr doesn't mean you can actually see your opponent. The f35s passive sensors and helmet ensures that at wvr engagement windows the f35 will always know exactly where the f22 is, even if the pilot loses sight of him.
      I'm not saying the f35 wins every time, but these matches would be far closer than people would expect using 1970s era theory. Just like jets and radar upturned the conventional wisdom of ww2 era piston fighters.

    • @josephmurphy6127
      @josephmurphy6127 22 дня назад

      A fight like this would never close to visual range unless both pilots were literally asleep.

  • @patmahomesisthegoat1622
    @patmahomesisthegoat1622 11 месяцев назад +2

    I’m pretty sure the F-35 is the most stealthy, more advanced, and has the better radar, all of which is crucial in a BVR engagement, although none of which matter in a dogfight because the F-22 practically has super-maneuverability

  • @TheOtherSteel
    @TheOtherSteel Год назад +10

    "It's not the crate, it's the man sitting in the crate."
    - Baron Manfred von Richthofen

  • @maryannmoran-smyth3453
    @maryannmoran-smyth3453 6 месяцев назад +1

    Welcome to the new age of aerial combat gentlemen. First sight, first lock, first, shoot, and then first strike. Second place in aerial dominance. Usually means you’re dead. No matter what plane you have or how good it flies having a superior kill chain is the difference between life and death and information is everything… Keep on rockin

  • @hoghogwild
    @hoghogwild Год назад +3

    Depends on all factors, but that's never mentioned. A true 1v1 guns only fight, Raptor all the way.

    • @deadshot4245
      @deadshot4245 Год назад

      in bvr raptor would smoke them in bfm they definitely are fucked. bvr it holds more missiles its faster and that gives you more power to keep them defensive and push them most people are retarded and dont understand jet combat its super dynamic to speed altitude and about 100 other factors

  • @russgoody5708
    @russgoody5708 Год назад +3

    Two brothers might bicker, but God forbid an outside force pick on either.

  • @jappejop
    @jappejop Год назад +2

    Never forget the moment the Mirage took out the F22 in a dogfight training. Maybe the F22 isn’t thát good after all, but just the pilots.

    • @Asghaad
      @Asghaad Год назад +1

      sigh, in those training Raptors ALWAYS start at incredible disadvantage specifically to teach theyr pilots the limits of the plane while also being restricted from using theyr full capabilities
      when your starting position is usually with oponent at your tail its frankly astounding that there are so FEW instances where F-22s get beaten

    • @Its_shiki_time4876
      @Its_shiki_time4876 Год назад +1

      Lmao no

  • @devo1977s
    @devo1977s 9 месяцев назад +1

    F35s is more similar to wolves hunting, you have 20 of them in the woods, watching you move around, waiting, deciding when to strike. You catch the sound of them, but you can't see them, until it's too late

  • @michaelpettersson4919
    @michaelpettersson4919 Год назад +2

    The quality of the pilots are probably a factor as well. Right now it look like the Russian airforce are ready to conscript just about anyone with some kind of pilot licence.

  • @bbmw9029
    @bbmw9029 Год назад +5

    They need to build an F-57. This would be an F-22 airframe with F-35 systems. Maybe fold in some B-21 technology also. They could probably get this into service before the new NGAD they're working on.

    • @Holdmy2nuts
      @Holdmy2nuts Год назад +6

      I think that’s what the NGAD is gonna be.

    • @KC_Smooth
      @KC_Smooth Год назад +2

      The NGAD will hopefully be the fighter you just described. Since the NGAD is already being fast tracked, I doubt they'd make 3rd 6th gen fighter at a faster rate.

    • @painthuret
      @painthuret Год назад

      They are planning on doing just that and it's called the F22 Super raptor and as of the F35 it was supposed to be updated with the NGAD tech but it's been delayed.

    • @poohbear1647
      @poohbear1647 Год назад

      Maybe add advanced vectoring exhaust like the Su 51 Felon.

    • @bbmw9029
      @bbmw9029 Год назад

      @@KC_Smooth My take is that the NGAD is the USAF's next attempt at a "transformational" technology. I think the F-22 still outclasses the J-20 or SU-57, so we really don't need new technology. We just need to pull all our existing technologies together into one fighter.

  • @ike_of_the_greil_mercenari465
    @ike_of_the_greil_mercenari465 Год назад +6

    Thank you, the F-35 doesn't get the respect it deserves.

    • @deadshot4245
      @deadshot4245 Год назад +1

      great jet but not a fair fight

  • @Ampersandbonerjam
    @Ampersandbonerjam Год назад +1

    And Air to Air fighter vs a Multi-role fighter/bomber, obviously the 22 is gonna have that DAWG in them but that’s like putting a wrestler vs boxer in a boxing match…

  • @j.timberwolf
    @j.timberwolf Год назад +3

    F22/F35 are great for tag team along F-15EX & F16 along dogfights and ground targets.

  • @kennethrivera6798
    @kennethrivera6798 Месяц назад +1

    MY TWO FAVORITES !!!! THEY BOTH GOT IT GOING ON... 🔥

  • @StevenRamos248
    @StevenRamos248 4 месяца назад +1

    If ANY 5th gen fighter is getting in a dogfight, something has gone terribly wrong.

  • @bakhodirjonkakhkharov344
    @bakhodirjonkakhkharov344 Год назад +2

    An American pilot said that F35 has a full advantage over F22. Because dog fights are not happening anymore

  • @bonedoc4556
    @bonedoc4556 Год назад +2

    Ok, so what's respectable?
    2?
    10?
    20?

  • @deniz_0909
    @deniz_0909 Год назад +1

    There is something you forgot. The F35 has a helmet-mounted sight system, so there is no hood screen like in the F22, the pilot only needs to look at the target to hit the target. In F22, there is a hood screen, so the nose of the plane has to be in line with the enemy plane, only then can it fire a missile.

  • @juzoli
    @juzoli 3 месяца назад +1

    The balance further shifts towards F-35 if it is not 1 vs 1, but 10 vs 10.

  • @LBCB94025
    @LBCB94025 Год назад +7

    next update on an f22 is thermal* bet

  • @MrGriff305
    @MrGriff305 Год назад +2

    All I did was read the title to decide I hate the internet now.

  • @Ikbeneengeit
    @Ikbeneengeit Год назад +19

    It's like asking whether Ferrari or Lamborghini can tow the heaviest boat trailer.

    • @Statueshop297
      @Statueshop297 Год назад +5

      Lamborghini every time😂

    • @Typexviiib
      @Typexviiib Год назад +1

      ​@@Statueshop297 awd ftw

    • @anthonykaiser974
      @anthonykaiser974 Год назад +1

      ​@@Statueshop297 well, they still make tractors, which I think is the origins of Lambo, but I don't think it's in the same company anymore.

    • @bcorlis1
      @bcorlis1 Год назад +2

      ​@@anthonykaiser974 Lamborghini Trattori versus Automobili Lamborghini. They still make tractors and have the same corporate structure, as far as I'm aware.

    • @Irishrebel092
      @Irishrebel092 Год назад +1

      well, Lamborghini started off building tractors 😂

  • @poohbear1647
    @poohbear1647 Год назад +12

    You didn’t answer the question. What is a respectable amount of victories ? 35? 51? 75?

    • @seansklenar3509
      @seansklenar3509 Год назад +2

      to me it implied less than 50 the way it was said, maybe 20-35%. Would have been better if it was more clear obv

    • @bonedoc4556
      @bonedoc4556 Год назад +1

      Same question I asked

  • @scottyou5443
    @scottyou5443 Год назад +38

    Growling Sidewinder could answer this question

    • @Holdmy2nuts
      @Holdmy2nuts Год назад +2

      Lol yup

    • @Smellon
      @Smellon Год назад +1

      Them sidewinder X missles gonna be screeching their way into to raptors behind🦅🦅

    • @thecommentator3732
      @thecommentator3732 Год назад +4

      ​@@Smellon he meant the DCS RUclipsr lmao

    • @thecommentator3732
      @thecommentator3732 Год назад +2

      DCS does not have accurate flight models of the F-22 and F-35

    • @Smellon
      @Smellon Год назад +2

      @@thecommentator3732 I understand but I had to take the opportunity

  • @djsmith2871
    @djsmith2871 Год назад +2

    I'll save you a minute and a half. The real answer to this simplistic question is: "It depends"

  • @MJHdesproj
    @MJHdesproj 3 дня назад

    “The F22 is the stealthiest fighter to ever fly” - lols in YF-23

  • @ScrapKing73
    @ScrapKing73 4 месяца назад +1

    A single F-22 probably beats an F-35. But a squadron of F-22s probably loses to a squadron of F-35s.

  • @iainhutchinson1957
    @iainhutchinson1957 Год назад +4

    Still the king of the sky. The raptor is still capable of moving like nothing reliant on the normal laws of flight can.

    • @mings6491
      @mings6491 Год назад

      Any Sukhoi aircraft: am I a joke to you?

    • @Alex-vx5zs
      @Alex-vx5zs Год назад +6

      ​@@mings6491 they literally are

    • @thecommentator3732
      @thecommentator3732 Год назад +5

      ​@@mings6491 Yes

    • @mings6491
      @mings6491 Год назад

      Lmao sure the F-22's engine power might be higher but if you look at the (a) experience that Russia has in super-manoeuvrable (capability to manoeuvre post-stall) aircraft, which stems from the preferred Russian doctrine of close-range engagements, and (b) the sheer manoeuvrability of the Su-57 or Su-27 series due to their independent all-axis thrust vectoring capabilities, I personally do think that the F-22 does lose out in terms of the sheer versatility of manoeuvres that those Sukhoi aircraft can pull off.

    • @mings6491
      @mings6491 Год назад

      (Now of course all that manoeuvrability means nothing if the aircraft can't close to within engagement range of the F-22, which the F-22 won't let it)

  • @solocity5803
    @solocity5803 21 день назад +1

    THE f35 is not meant for dog fights 🤯🤯

  • @johnnytdufc
    @johnnytdufc Год назад

    So you don't know. "Wit all yo Jive talkin!!!"

  • @DZ-qj5br
    @DZ-qj5br Год назад +1

    This fight really only depends on who detect who first or who dodge the most missiles I guess

  • @rehab_reject
    @rehab_reject Год назад +3

    In a dogfight, F22 wins in first turn every time.

  • @billwhite1603
    @billwhite1603 Год назад +2

    That is a no answer. Respectable is an opinion, not number guess. Do you "feel" it might be 50%, 65 out of a hundred? My guess is that in skies where it is not known a bandit exists, the F-35 should have more of an advantage but if in closer known contested areas it may go to the F-22.

    • @Typexviiib
      @Typexviiib Год назад +1

      This is fair. I'll add that numbers matter quite a bit too. One f22 vs one f35 would favor the f22. 5 f22s vs 5 f35s is going to be a bad day for the f22s.

  • @MgGlobal
    @MgGlobal 5 месяцев назад

    Thank you 🙏🏼
    Now I know which one to go and buy at my local store

  • @appa609
    @appa609 Год назад +2

    In 1v1 BFM from neutral merge I give the raptor 9 fights out of 10. You have to make a pretty serious mistake to lose.
    In a 1v1 BVR joust with awacs, F-22 7/10. It's a lot faster and that means it can control the engagement geometry.
    1v1 without awacs, f-35 8/10. all aspect irst is a major advantage and forces the raptor low and slow.

  • @herbertkeithmiller
    @herbertkeithmiller Год назад +1

    Calling Bimkof's Battlegrounds

  • @JoshBeardyHarris
    @JoshBeardyHarris День назад

    If the AIM-9X is on the F-35, that HOBS weapon and the HMD is going to be a serious problem for the Raptor.

  • @Randomfactsofwar
    @Randomfactsofwar 7 месяцев назад

    Who would win?
    An export design multi role fighter, or the scariest flying object since the Stuka?

  • @IrenSqaud
    @IrenSqaud Год назад +1

    Imagine if the U.S combined the f-35 and f-22

  • @smeary10
    @smeary10 Год назад +1

    The F-35 has superior radar and avionics. It'd kill F-22, as it did in exercise in late 2021, from distance and the Raptor wouldn't have known it was even there.

  • @thanhtong2281
    @thanhtong2281 Год назад +1

    Question : F15 makes 50,000lbs of thrust from both engines. And F-22 makes 70,000lbs. Top speed of F-15 is mach 2.5. So why is top speed for F-22 is 2.2? Yet an F-22 can walk away from F-15 if it does want to engage and F-15 can’t keep up. So are we mislead about F-22 top speed to keep it classified?
    Even scarier than F-22 is YF-23 can walk away from F-22 like F-22 does to F-15.

  • @samhamilton69014
    @samhamilton69014 2 месяца назад

    Old vid - The F-22 has now reportedly got IRST capability, better stealth profile with new stealth droptanks, and helmet based electro optical targeting, which will significantly up the kill ratio on the F35

  • @Cygnuss_ID
    @Cygnuss_ID 6 месяцев назад

    "Its not the plane its the pilot"

  • @ShivamSharma-zd8lw
    @ShivamSharma-zd8lw 7 месяцев назад

    whichever has a better fighter pilot wins

  • @zeblambert3213
    @zeblambert3213 5 месяцев назад

    There met to in flight together like a sniper and a sweeper with each respective job

  • @nathanielcowan3971
    @nathanielcowan3971 Год назад

    The f22 is a super computer. The f35 is an internet connection.

  • @19coyote5oh9
    @19coyote5oh9 Год назад +1

    Glad my country Canada has FINALLY decided to purchase the f35.

  • @rooseveltrainesjr7618
    @rooseveltrainesjr7618 6 месяцев назад

    All we need now is putting plan that thing is a beast.

  • @Johnson-vd4ed
    @Johnson-vd4ed Год назад +1

    Question who has the most toys
    Our boneyard can best most air forces

  • @stephenwest6738
    @stephenwest6738 Год назад

    Recent and pending upgrades will essentially level them out. But what is certain is that they are the 2 best fighters in the world by a fairly large margin, and they probably will be for at least another generation.

  • @drksideofthewal
    @drksideofthewal Год назад +1

    In a squadron vs squadron battle I favor the F-35. Each plane is giving every other plane in the squadron total awareness

  • @spilledmilkgamingYT
    @spilledmilkgamingYT Месяц назад +4

    I’ve heard an actual F-35 pilot that was a former F-22 pilot say it can hold its own against the F-22 for a while

  • @Utubesuperstar
    @Utubesuperstar Год назад +1

    F35 can literally shoot targets behind below above beside etc literally any direction the pilots can look through the plane and it has ir sensors

  • @frankcastle5737
    @frankcastle5737 11 месяцев назад

    F35 doesn't sound like much of an upgrade from an F22. In my experience, it's always the skill that prevails not so much the technology. Every major war has a skilled person in just about every field.

  • @TheJudoJoker
    @TheJudoJoker Год назад +13

    I would actually argue the F35 would win more than the F22. The technology and situational awareness is just that much better.

    • @Typexviiib
      @Typexviiib Год назад +3

      People have a hard time wrapping their heads around how much a missile that pulls 60 gs and can be launched in any direction completely changes air warfare. Especially when stealth pushes the planes to get very close to each other.

    • @apex_blue
      @apex_blue Год назад +2

      Especially if it’s more like 2v 2 or even 4 v 4 which is more realistic than a 1 v 1

    • @Asghaad
      @Asghaad Год назад

      @@Typexviiib and you are severely overestimating tracking capabilities of those missiles against plane with reduced thermal signature and not presenting its hot engines due to maneuverability advantage and using countermeasures.
      F-35 is multirole fighter bomber, not air superiority fighter

    • @Typexviiib
      @Typexviiib Год назад +2

      @@Asghaad I'm actually not. The 9x has fractional degree temperature resolution and frontal aspect kill capabilities. It doesn't need to see jet exhaust at all, the minor difference in ambient heat from the electronics in the plane, heat soak through the engine cowling, or even sun shine or air friction heating up the skin is enough to aquire a firing solution. Those spy balloons that were shot down recently didn't have any jet exhaust at all to track. Did you know the 9x doesn't use a cryogenic gas? It uses a Stirling engine to super cool the seaker, this gives much better resolution and far longer run times than the older compressed gas heads.
      Even if the missile had trouble acquiring a near ambient temperature target, the f35 itself doesn't. The 9x has ins and data link, and can guide itself to its target using the f35s das coupled with its irst.
      Designations have nothing to do with capabilities or performance. The f15e is a multirole fighter bomber, doesn't stop it from shooting down interceptors. All being "multirole" means is you're not pigeon holed into one primary role. Think about a modern carrier group, there are f35s and f18s. Both extremely versatile multi role fighter, and the navy is comfortable with their ability to defend a carrier strike group on the other side of the planet from the us. F35 is upwards of 15/1 k/d ratio in training exercises against a variety of fighters.

    • @Asghaad
      @Asghaad Год назад

      @@Typexviiib not how that works bud, sure it can "see" frontal aspect, but when you drop flares that have magnitudes higher signature than fuselage friction heat even thermal imaging sensor of the 9x will go stupid and bite on the decoy...
      Which is exactly why front aspect shots are highly discouraged as they have the lowest PK ...

  • @ironsurvival7011
    @ironsurvival7011 6 месяцев назад

    Maverick wins. It’s not the plane, it’s the pilot in the box.

  • @jamesmaddison4546
    @jamesmaddison4546 11 месяцев назад

    Just fyi everyone. The f22 is going NOWHERE. Congress approved a bill to protect it and fund $13.6 billion for the raptor fleet for complete modernization upgrades. its not being retired, only 37 of the oldest airframes are going from combat wings to training wings. After those upgrades, its gonna be a freaking demon

  • @victorduny9842
    @victorduny9842 8 месяцев назад

    Whom ever see the other guy first usually wins in today’s environment.

  • @chookchack
    @chookchack 6 месяцев назад

    The lightning is relatively cheaper too, so you can bring more in the dogfight than the raptor. 10 raptors vs 15 lightning 🤷🏻‍♂️

  • @lukascruz4831
    @lukascruz4831 14 дней назад

    What’s really crazy is that we have to bicker about which one are our own aircraft’s is more superior because no other country can compare 😭

  • @j.d.604
    @j.d.604 Год назад

    The F-22 would win a dogfight. But from real-world, long distance approach the F-35's EOTS and AN/APG-81 gives it unsurpassed capability. Especially the Block 4 F-35s that will be upgraded with Advanced EOTS, the AN/APG-85 Nitride Gallium based TRM's with increased detection range, and the XA-100 adaptive cycle engines with increased thrust, reduced IR signature, and unparalleled performance.

  • @graemepaton3538
    @graemepaton3538 Год назад

    Todays fighters DONT dogfight. They are not designed for close combat

  • @duanemcdaniel9642
    @duanemcdaniel9642 3 месяца назад

    He who sees who first wins. At the merge... Raptor ALL day

  • @siirall
    @siirall 10 месяцев назад

    One can be exported while the other can’t; says it all!

    • @ZanderStrom10
      @ZanderStrom10 10 месяцев назад

      F22 can’t be exported because it’s too strong

    • @lars9966
      @lars9966 6 месяцев назад

      the f35's which get exported are export variants. the US f35 probably far more lethal than the f22. if they exported the f22, they would also create export variants like they did for the f35.

  • @swyzzlestyx
    @swyzzlestyx Год назад

    I would give the fight to the F-22. The F-35 has some advantages and can use specific strategies to get its way, but the F-22 is a capable fighter and can use tricks to upset the F-35's preferred winning tactics. If the F-35's primary winning method is ruined, it doesn't have a fallback of being a world-class fighter as the F-22 does.

  • @3dmax911
    @3dmax911 2 месяца назад +2

    one thing thats make me not agree with you wich is whay they didnt sell the F22 Raptor like they did with the F35 !! and also whay the F22 cost more !!
    i think the Raptor is superior to the F35 in every aspect !!

  • @davewebster5120
    @davewebster5120 Год назад

    As far as I know the F-117 is the stealthiest fighter flying because it's stealthed thermally as well as from radar. It's radar return is probably crap, by today's standards, but there's a reason we use F-117's as adversaries to train stealth fighter pilots.

  • @michaelpalodichuk5000
    @michaelpalodichuk5000 Год назад

    The idea that a joint strike fighter has counter stealth fighter technology that hasn't been invested into the air superiority fighter is stupid.

    • @anthonykaiser974
      @anthonykaiser974 Год назад

      Well, think about how long the Raptor has been flying, and how much money had to go into development of the F-35 AFTER the Raptor was FOC.

  • @jcm5083
    @jcm5083 Год назад +1

    Team vs team

  • @ashkannorouzi2521
    @ashkannorouzi2521 Год назад

    If USAF add a more capable electronic warfare system and a more improved helmet and locking system on raptor they wouldn't need a 6th gen fighter for at least next 20 years

  • @JamesStreet-tp1vb
    @JamesStreet-tp1vb 3 месяца назад

    F22 wins it. The F22's design is an air superiority fighter. The F35 is mainly a ground attack aircraft. If you linked the F22, F35 and B21, and drone wingmen you would have the most capable ground attack combination in all of history.

  • @Hathur
    @Hathur Год назад

    Can f22 fire its missiles backwards like the f35? Technically I guess it comes down to who sees who first.

  • @santosl.harper4471
    @santosl.harper4471 5 часов назад

    the question is dogfight! Not BVR combat

  • @thelonelypigeon9554
    @thelonelypigeon9554 Год назад

    F-35 has over 890+ units, F-22 only about a 190 units, roughly 150 are most likely available for flight with personnel with the training to fly it. Most of them are most likely highly trained officers with the longest experience and security clearance. In other words, it's like the spartans of the airforce.
    The F-22 can carry 6 AMRAAMs and 2 heaters internally without disrupting stealth capabilities. F-35 can carry 4 AMRAAMs internally without losing stealth but no fox-2s unless external stations are added.
    F-22s can have roughly 1400-1600nm fuel range but require a dedicated airfield with security and the equipment for the plane to deploy.
    F-35s especially on the B and C variants are capable of being deployed on carriers. Fuel range of 1200-1300nm. Essentially unlimited range.
    F-22s are older, but highly premium. F-35s are newer with efficiency tech and lower price tag.
    It's like comparing a Charger Dodge demon vs a Lambo Countach.
    I will say that if we were to compare which would win, 1 v 1 = F-22 wins. Whole Team fight = F-35 wins. Pilot skill VS = F-22 pilots win. Long fight = F-35 wins.
    There's just more to offer on the F-35 atm. More equipment, more bases and carriers that are able to help F-35s. More pilots, Maintenace guys who work and train with F-35s and less needed security than the F-22, plus it can be on a boat.
    Information wise, F-22s would lose, since you just need one guy with a radio and sitting and watching the enemy airbase, you can count how many F-22s were deployed and relay in how many F-35s to deploy to counter the strike force or in reverse.

  • @codyshealy6509
    @codyshealy6509 Год назад

    Yeah the F22 ......if the F35 won any fight it would be a long range engagement where the F22 was caught napping

  • @scuddman400
    @scuddman400 6 месяцев назад

    Hey don't let the kid hear that........

  • @ulvschmidt7174
    @ulvschmidt7174 Год назад

    Two stealth fighters flying around with their radars of as too not light up as a beacon trying desperatly too too find the other lol

  • @wrench.01
    @wrench.01 3 месяца назад

    In a close quarters engagement, f35 gets obliterated, in a long range confrontation the f35 will always win
    The f22 is meant to dogfight, the f35 is meant to end the dogfight miles away before they’re detected and before they happen

  • @Heritageoz
    @Heritageoz Год назад

    I have a comment to add to one of your videos.
    You have said that no F-15’s have ever been shot down, correct?
    In the Gulf war we lost 2 F-15E’s. One was from the 335th , and 336th squadrons, buy anti aircraft fire and a Sam missile.
    So technically two have been shot Dow.

  • @MISTERX_5890
    @MISTERX_5890 Год назад

    F-22 has the Maneuverability advantage, once F-22 gets behind F-35 then its over

  • @alexdarcydestsimon3767
    @alexdarcydestsimon3767 Год назад +1

    The F35 has so many flaws that it hardly flies, while the F22 is the best ever US designed airplane.

    • @ImWoolly
      @ImWoolly Год назад

      I do not see how you came to the conclusion lmao

    • @alexdarcydestsimon3767
      @alexdarcydestsimon3767 Год назад

      @@ImWoolly you had my links to news articles removed.
      You're such a biased.

    • @ImWoolly
      @ImWoolly Год назад

      @@alexdarcydestsimon3767 wdym i had your links removed?

  • @jic1
    @jic1 Год назад

    I assume that this has been tried in real life. Not in actual combat obviously, but I can't believe that they haven't faced each other in training engagements yet.

  • @kalebgonzales4009
    @kalebgonzales4009 День назад

    Screw those. F-23!

  • @Konkr420
    @Konkr420 Год назад +10

    crazy tossup. F-22 clears probably 60% of the time

    • @Lardum
      @Lardum Год назад +1

      That's still a dub for the F-35 cost wise.
      Pilot costs? What's that? Never heard of em.

    • @kiro9257
      @kiro9257 Год назад +4

      I’d argue that the abysmally low pilot readiness in the F-22 will be the Achilles Heel of the Raptor. Moreover, the fact that the F-22 will have a $15 Billion upgrade just to match the F-35 Block 3 is a definite sign that the Raptor has finally lost the superiority that it once had.
      The maintenance and flight costs are also expensive hence, the Raptor would be in quite of a stir.

    • @Lardum
      @Lardum Год назад

      @cheggers! I have bad news.
      The F-35 doesn't care about "nose authority" or "agility", it will detect you, it will shoot you down, doesn't matter in what direction you are

  • @phantom0456
    @phantom0456 Год назад

    The title says “dogfight,” not “fight,” and in an actual dogfight, it’s going to be the F-22 every time… that being said, it’s almost never going to come to that, simply because of all of the SA that these two airframes have.

  • @jacobwatson3781
    @jacobwatson3781 Год назад

    The question was a Dogfight, let's get serious. F22 would win easily time and time again. Now BVR, that would be interesting.

  • @Khatakhat_Tharki
    @Khatakhat_Tharki Год назад

    Rat-por getting permanent retirement by 2030