Unregistered 47: Michael Malice
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 16 окт 2024
- Michael Malice is the author of Dear Reader: The Unauthorized Autobiography of Kim Jong Il, the subject of Harvey Pekar's Ego & Hubris: The Michael Malice Story, a columnist for The Observer, and a cable news renegade.
For bonus episodes, our Discord channel for supporters, and access to Unregistered Live, go to / unregistered
For courses you won't find on a college campus, go to www.unregister...
Please follow us on alternative platforms as RUclips is an unreliable host:
rumble.com/use...
odysee.com/@un...
A good discussion between an idealist and a realist.
Watching Thaddeus get schooled by Malice is entertaining.
This was a really good interview of Michael Malice being asked to pretend he's someone else.
elephantrider78 Exactly. This reminded me of his annoying Rogan appearance.
I'm not sure I care for Thaddeus Russell im only here because I've run out of things to watch of malice. But I'm enjoying this banter. The way Michael gives nuance to people who are really out there with their ideologies is fascinating. Its not a common thing in these days.
One of my favorite Unregistered guests
I tune in to hear a conversation with Malice, I get an interview with someone who interviewed Jared Taylor. You screwed this one up Thad.
Sounds like Thad is scared to talk to Jared Taylor because his ideas are taboo.
100%
he doesn't want to talk to him because he doesn't like him, nobody has to talk to people they don't like
@@xFlRSTx agreed
Michael Malice is AWESOME
"There's no quacking in my studio" lolol
It is so ironic how Thaddeus preaches that he is fine talking to "dangerous" others, yet gets scared stiff when challenged to talk with an intellectual opponent.
I wish I was half as smart as Mr. Russell thinks he is.
I wish I was twice as smart as Michael Malice is.
Malice is great. Ruseell not so much so lol
Guest was great.
Host was meh.
People say that a lot about this podcast.
Thaddy with his self-congratulatory smugness. Oof! Already "enjoying" this "podcast". Word to the wise: don't make it about you at minute ONE. -_-
“I'm saying they're not very good at being racists” Had me cracking up.
Great podcast after about 30 minutes. Learned quite a lot.
Malice is so great here that I was able to tolerate Russell being completely insufferable.
I don't understand why this podcast isn't being played more people.
Because it's only audio. I usually listen to it in my phone through the Podcasts mobile app or Stitcher.
I love the rapport between Thad and Michael. Like two giddy schoolboys.
This is, simply, an amazing discussion. I don't know or like either of these two, or most of the people they talked about; but the discussion, banter, and interchange is unsurpassed.
Peterson doesn't justify hierarchy with the bible. He justifies the longevity of the hierarchic ideas of the bible by proving that hierarchies are biological structures and not a modern social construct.
Benjamin Beltran I really want Peterson on the podcast sometime in the future. I agree with Thad on post modernism but I agree with Peterson on his ideas on finding meaning within that chaos. I think both view points are valid in their own ways.
Benjamin Beltran Yeah. He even argues it’s deeper than biology.
Benjamin Beltran I probably gotta look this up. But that’s interesting. Sad the debate with Thad and Peterson won’t happen. I was at least happy to see Brett Weinstein and Thad but I still want more.
Fuck, now I have to read Michael Malice's book!
50:38 I think it is incorrect to say jbp "wants" hierarchy of ANY particular type. He believes they are inevitable, based on the unequal distribution of valued traits. That is an important distinction.
My two favorite guys... great show
Thaddeus you ruined this episode by being so fucking triggered about Jared Taylor's point of view.
Yes massa
How. How can you be a Thaddeus Russel follower and sympathize with anything Jared Taylor says
you can listen to someone's ideas and not agree with them without freaking out like Thad did during this episode.
Who says i sympathize? And what if i do? Isn't Thaddeus' podcast all about fringe ideas?
Fidelio ridiculous statement. (And I highly dislike Jared Taylor)
Would love to see Thaddeus interview Taylor
"It doesn't make sense, it's contradictory"
. . . said by the postmodernist who denied the validity of the law of non-contradiction while on Patterson In Pursuit.
What in fuck is better than two smart people talking about ideas? Pure gold, this.
You spelled one wrong. But you're right malice is a gem
Love these two, they are so funny together.
These queens. Great second ep of malice
OMG you have got do do more interviews! I just love your fresh take on issues. How can we clear your schedule and chain you to the microphone?v
Japan today would probably qualify as the kind of ethno-state that Jared Taylor is speaking about, albeit a Japanese version. That example would probably clarify things for Thad. This makes sense as Taylor had lived in Japan. Thad should visit; it's a very different country from the progressive West.
almost taking a Cathy Newman turn on this one in places :/
good talk nonetheless.
The Malice of Michael
Thad judges people by the accent. Next he will judge people by the colour of their skin😖?
Taylor doesn't have a British accent, not from any corner of the UK. What a stupid comment.
Love Malice, I found Russel to be such a pretentious dogmatist. If it doesn’t fit HIS understanding of definitions, it’s wrong. He can’t understand Jared Taylor is not a white supremacist because he only sees those topics as binary. When Russel kept trying to get Malice to explain Taylor’s mind, and especially only in a strictly disparaging way, I knew Russel was an NPC. He can’t think in shades, he only understands the “narratives”.
Love Malice, but Russel kind of wasted his time. I still appreciate hearing him though.
Yea I’ve listened to this one multiple times. And Thad’s push to hear about the alt right kinda sucked a bit. I’d like a follow up this year before the book drops
The fish in water thing reminds me of an anti-capitalist who doesn't realise the social function of prices.
You are conflating facts of race, with facts of perception of race. Recall from Thomas Sowell there are different types of discrimination (www.independent.org/publications/tir/article.asp?id=1362), and race is very effective Schelling Point.
If you are not racist and you want to cooperate with people of other races, you nonetheless must first establish that the members of the other race are not racist, and that all the members know each other to be non-racists. That overhead, which you may recognize from the Prisoner's Dilemma, is simply an unfortunate concomitant of interracial dealings.
Not all effects are negative. The good might outweigh the bad. Don't neglect the strongest argument of the race realists. After decades of forced racial integration many blacks are often often blaming those very whites and Jews who are in every measured way the least racist for every unfortunate circumstance of life.
If every scientific fact of racism or race realism were disproven utterly and even if additionally the problem of indeterminate races were utterly devastating to the arguments of race realists, the peculiar cost of interracial cooperation would remain.
Subbed!!!!!
The voices in my head have a podcast?
thad sounds like the zeitgest guy
There haven't been nor aren't there nor will there be infinite kinds of hierarchies. Hierarchies have a constant and that's the relationship of power of some over others. The details are important off course but the "infinite" variation is first FALSE and second irrelevant.
Is it me or does the host sound like a beta-wanna-be-Bill-Buckley?
Takes 60 odd books to research North Korea
Let's make our views on race confusing then it will be strategically palatable .......
No means no Thad!
I don't like the definition of the new right micheal gives in this because it would include most libertarian leftists, how can you be new right if you are far left.
Why are fascists left wing?
What metric makes them right wing?
I don't think traditionally they were right wing, I think traditionally they were left wing, and leftists realized they'd dun fucked up, and labeled them right ring.
In Italy, Spain, Germany and Japan, each political decision-making was turned toward "what are the borders, inside which, we'll make sure to smooth away capitalist exploitation, reinvigorate cultural strength and ensure better people for the future? Well, how about the nation?"
The book "Nietzsche & the Nazis" has a pretty good dissection of the subject.