I ADVICE BROTHER Shamsi to watch the debates of sheikh Muzamil Fakeeri hafidaho Allah because there are lot of lessons and information that can help you to expose the enemies of Islam
it has nothing to do about Saudi or turkey the prophet peace be upon him said "whome ever wants to give advice to leaders he should do it in private" and Ibn abbas said "don't talk about leaders badly if they are aren't infront of you" but you people don't wanna follow Quran and sunnah just like shis ya Ali ya hussain we tell him the prophet said don't pray to anyone but Allah and they say why you don't talk about Saudi! !!! boy you on shirk akbar Saudi on sin if you both day they go jannah you go hell
لا إلهَ إلا اللهُ وَحْدَهُ لا شَرِيكَ لَهُ ، لَهُ المُلْكُ وَ لَهُ الحَمْدُ يُحْيِي وَ يُمِيتُ وَ هُوَ حَيٌّ لا يَمُوْتُ بِيَدِهِ الخَيْرُ وَ إليهي مصير وَهُوَ عَلَى كل شيء قادر وأشهد أن محمدا عبده ورسوله صلى الله عليه وسلم اللهم صل على سيدنا محمد النبي الأمي وعلى آله وصحبه وسلم
You talk nonsense. Salah is debt to Allah swt. But if you dont have real understanding of tauhid like shamsi this ex sufi donkey it is normal. All Messengers came with the same important message first before do Salah. Learn tauhid.
You are right. Everyone makes mistakes. The difference is, the ones he refute don't believe they are making mistakes and they stand by their beliefs Look for the video "why the people of sunnah refute innovators more than non Muslims - Shaykh Salih aal-alshaykh" on the daarusSunnah channel May Allah guide me and you
may Allah guide you, islam refutes misguidance, we muslims are not gonna tolerate terrorism, we will continue to refute misguidance and mistakes, insha Allah
3thrd usul of madaakhila: The madaakhila believe that if you worship Allah and you worship besides Allah the moon out of ignorance than you are still a muslim, muwahid, monotheist. The proof of the madaakhila is the hadith when the sahabi Mu'aadh ibn jabal returned from shaam and visited the prophet, mu'aadh made sujud to the prophet out of respect for him pbuh. But the prophet pbuh did not takfir Mu'aadh for this because mu'aadh was according the madaakhila jaahil. So therefor if for instance a man makes sujud to grave and ask the dead person to heal him out of ignorance then he is excused just as mu'aadh was excused.
I don't understand why Shamsi doesn't denounce Saudi for its close relationship with India and Modi. It seems like only Arab Muslim blood is worth defending but South Asian Muslims are worthless.
Usul of madaakhila is: 1st: According to the shayk of shamsi, shayk abu khadeeja, a taghut (...wich we are commanded by Allah to reject and make kufr of...) can be a muslim too. Question: Where in the quran or sunnah is stated that a taghut can be a muslim too ?
Taghut is the one changing the law of Allah, not ruling with sharia doesn`t take the leader out of islam! Go read commentary of ibn abbas about kufr duna kufr, so don’t try t justify youre takfiri behaviour 🤣🤡 alhamdulillah i am more for sharia then you are but stick to the sunnah. Don’t slander sheikh rabee al madkali, alhamdulillah for the sunnah, we expose the jokeman khawarij😋
First he said may Allah guide leader of Turkey. He pointed out shirk is permissible in Turkey. Is this OK with you? Shirk is not permissible is Saudi. Are you not happy with this? May Allah guide me and you
Karijis aren't Kaffirs automatically, it can't be a Freudian slip as it doesn't make sense in the first place. Kharijis are takfiris is what he meant don't be stupid
Shamsi is just a preacher. Not a debator. Very knowledgeable. People loose interest if just preach it's boring. Even if preaching is intention engage with Audience
Shamsi does debate non Muslims but he doesn't open up the debates to nonsense. He keeps it short and to the point. If the person persists after the evidence has been established, there is no need to continue. I've seen most Muslims in speakers corner have pointless debates for hours. As for debating Muslims, once a Muslim stands firm on a deviant position then it is not from the trails of the people of sunnah to debate with the innovators. Imām Ahmad Ibn Hanbal (rahimahullāh) said in the beginning of his Usool as-Sunnah: “Do not sit with the people of desires (deviation), and do not argue with them or debate with them.” This is Ahmad ibn Hanbal in the third century, he died in the year 241 after the Hijrah
Let me bring you evidence shamsi. From the QURAN. "They have taken their rabbis and monks as well as the Messiah, son of Mary, as lords besides Allah,1 even though they were commanded to worship none but One God. There is no god ˹worthy of worship˺ except Him. Glorified is He above what they associate ˹with Him˺!" 9:31 Ibn kathir states in his tafsir: (They took their rabbis and their monks to be their lords besides Allah...) that the Christians and Jews obeyed their monks and rabbis in whatever they allowed or prohibited for them. This is why Allah said, وَمَآ أُمِرُواْ إِلاَّ لِيَعْبُدُواْ إِلَـهاً وَحِداً (while they were commanded to worship none but One God), Who, whatever He renders prohibited is the prohibited, whatever He allowed is the allowed, whatever He legislates, is to be the law followed, and whatever He decides is to be adhered to; لاَّ إِلَـهَ إِلاَّ هُوَ سُبْحَـنَهُ عَمَّا يُشْرِكُونَ (None has the right to be worshipped but He. Hallowed be He above what they associate (with Him).) Meaning, exalted, sanctified, hallowed above partners, equals, aids, rivals or children, there is no deity or Lord worthy of worship except Him. So those who prohibit what Allah has made halal and permit what Allah had made haram is calling to the worship of other than Allah, hence he's a Taghut. And those who follow them in obedience willingly are mushrik.
If you hate someone call him khawarij it's not necessary for someone evil to be khawarij. In politics a Man robs his own house and blames the neighbours.
this is my conclusion. Allah has body parts A Sheen hands feats eyes side face and curly hair and he prays like a Muslim. He is a man. The Quran wil also come like a pale man the eternal Quran is also a man. Then you got a stone that can forgive sins and Muslim pray in its direction an kiss it. What is islam the belive in two GODMEN And a god stone a idol. And Mohammad died and never resurrected. The guy that promise virgens in Yamna. Never came back This is islam in short Do you see the problem.
He is a 90 year old scholar from medina. But subhana wllah no one knows him in the muslim ummah. Cause Allah didnt give him that. Only his folowwers know him. He is poison for tje ummah
What are u talking about...so many ppl know him. Your point is false and even if it were true it would still be weak. Indeed there are 100s of companions of the prophet (PBUH) that many muslims dont know. Does that mean that they were not good muslims? To the contrary they are among the best to have ever lived.
fear Allah and don't bring palestine into this, we obviously can't say too much but lets say that any kind of self defence of palestine was major part not from the "muslim countries" of our's. and they wouldn't have needed to take help from outside sources if muslim countries weren't busy giving their money to those that kill muslim in palestine and china. again fear Allah, i do not support the iranian regime but don't dare spew the retoric of the people who justify putting their hand with the hand of those that kill the muslims and destroy the aqsa. seriously i know people say "fear Allah" a lot but this time i very much mean it, fear allah. becuase with this twisted narrative, you do not put Allah first, you put certain political parties first which is frankly disgusting.
It's spelt Allah with a capital A and Muslim with a capital M. Why do you put Muslim countries with inverted commas? Do you believe they are lands of kufr? It is upon you to bring any scholars of Ahlus Sunnah who agree with you in this. Who are you to comment on the decisions of the ruler? Musnad Ahmad 14909 clearly states that the rulers are advised in private, not out loud in front of fulan and 'allan. BarakAllahu feek, may Allah guide you to Salafiyyah
@@ponderingspirit1475 may Allah guide me and keep on guiding me to the straight path period. did the prophet say salafiyyah? i don't think so. we follow the Allah, the prophet, the sahaba , then the salaf and the athar. i have no problem with that, i also don't call rebellion or even making takfeer. it's just a simple fact that most "muslim" countries are not ACTUAL muslim countries, they are secular countries with a lot of muslims, in fact in some of those countries muslims are second if not theird class citizens. who am i to comment on the decision of the ruler? what can i now not call batel batel? i can't call fahisha, fahisha? i can't enjoin on good and forbid evil...ow that's true i can't, i would be in jail far faster than if i actually did sins. btw i'm not even calling what the rulers do as fahisha and or batel, but just telling the people that were allowed by the government to do this fahisha and batel, advising them even if it's allowed by the government that they shouldn't do it would land you in jail. in fact one of our fellow brothers a daai in egypt who makes simple videos of comparative religion and showing chrstians (all on the internet and showing books and such rather than targetting folks) the truth. and he was jailed TWICE the second for 2 years on false charges with zero proof for making christians feel "uncomfortable" while their bishop or whatever he is called is mocking islam and saying it is a violent religion spread by the sword in the middle of the capital of egypt. this is one example among many many many examples. btw all of this and in my comment i didn't even mention the decisions of rulers, i just stated that people in palestine who are defending themselves wouldn't have had to take support from iran if these "muslim" countries weren't too busy supporting who are killing the muslims. am i not allowed to state facts now? i am now a khawarij for stating simple facts and not to slander our muslim brothers defending themselves and al aqsa? what brother, is that simple for you to put me in a catagory of people you think my blood is halal to spill? btw, i never called anybody names, to me they are childish marji or whatever that was called, salafi, athari all of these terms are childish when used in such situations to separate people. i understand if you want to use themfor educational purposes when you are studying formally but really ultimately we go back to the quran and sunnah. i tell you also to fear Allah, stop doing what you claim others are doing and stop slandering people. it's already difficult for us who are practicing islam in muslim lands much less trying to set us up and trying to justify killing us. just like brother shamsi said, enemy of my enemy is my friend, who do you think it helps when you take down the people who resist in palestine and slander them? is it haram for them to do business with the only entity they can take support from, but it is halal for others to take support from forget kuffar but literal enemies of islam even though they have a lot of options? and again, I my self am not saying it's halal or haram, in fact i can see why muslim countries may seem to have options but in reality are forced to put their hands with the kuffar. what I AM saying is that why do you people give that privilage to some groups and not others? why is one leadership have a green ticket of halal to do so but not the other?
@@PoeticSonic Kind of true. We have secular countries with a Muslim population. To be honest you can't defend any "Muslim" country these days except the ones that are having the worst end of it like Yemen and Palestine I think.
@@therealgunny it's not even about defending, they don't want us to say anything that states certain leadership is wrong, ironically they don't mind when the leadership is not a puppet state but then they would basically say your blood is halal to spill if you even dare to mention something that a clearly puppet leadership/leader is doingvery haram things. for an example and again i have no affiliations for neighther of them, i recognise that this is politics and there are things we don't know, nor am i calling for any rebellion but why is it not okay for hamas or actually the many different palestinian organisations that defend the palestinians against the kuffar (vast majority of israeli people are athiests but are ethnically "jewish") are called against for taking weapons and so on from iran even though they don't allow shia tetoric inside gaza and the actually do not allow shiasm at all. and most importantly are the LEADERS of gaza and iran was the only ones who offered any help. yet we can't talk about leaders who are free to chose from where to get support yet they exclusivly chose to take support from kuffor powers. or maybe our brothers don't recognise palstine or palestinians as an entity, maybe they see gaza as an area of israel so they will on;y recognise a leader for the muslims only after they are apointed by israel.... even if you say iran is a kuffry state, at the very least they aren't destroying the aqsa as we speak or killing/torturing and inslaving over 2 million muslims. again, i can understand how maybe it apears to us as layman's that these muslim countries can chose from wherever they want but actually they are forced to take "support" from kuffry states. what i am asking them is to keep some consistancy and not to be hypocrites and it pains me to call them names like this but i have seen shamsi and those that are like him say the same thing many times against palestinians and those that defend palestine and Al Aqsa. if you have nothing good to say then stay silant. isn't that what they tell us? then again keep the same energy. btw i my self normally keep silant, i am too much of a layman both islamically and politically to talk about it and from the little i can see rebelion in this day and age wil jsut cause more fitna, i actually agree with them. in this case i was just defending the honor of the palestinians and those that are defending them, as they have been slandered by shamsi and his like multiple times. i know at least for shamsi he isn't doing it out of maliciousness, i'm am just trying to wake him up and those that are like him. if i am wrong, please advise me, and explain to me. i might be week in certain things and sin, but if am sinning or incorrect then i am humble enough to accept it as ultimatily what i care about more than my ego getting hurt is not going to the hellfire.
@@PoeticSonic I have read the Quran cover to cover but studying Quran is different than reading it so I'm a layman myself too. I don't disagree with you, all of the Muslim countries have done some good and some bad. Sometimes the bad prevails over the good and vice versa. I just wish Muslims were united and if any Muslim state is in a bad shape, there is no one to blame but ourselves at the end, because we let others to divide us. I don't want to spread hatred by saying that Shamsi is defending this or that but I don't agree with him that Saudis are the best to follow while they're the biggest buyers of weapon in the world from west and the relations they have with them. We can be wrong we can be right. Best thing to do is to follow the Quran and the Prophet to our best of abilities. We all harvest what we plant just like how the Quran says.
Hypocrisy it's part of every human everyone has mistake we are besher . Shamsi may have mistakes and sometimes he doesn't know what he saying it's okay but mostly (about religion he is right ) because he is not politically educated person and it's something good 👍
Look for the video Mohammed hijab character assassination or sincere advice. Shamsi never intended any disrespect to the sahabi and repent straight away even the Shia acknowledged his repentance. Hijab intended disrespect to the sahabi and never repented. Also a khariji (rebel) is someone who does kharooj (rebels) against a leader. Hussain alaihi a Salam was not a ruler.
I'm sorry for you, MH deceived you Shamsi repented in the same clip that MH brought, but MH has no honesty and he is just a liar wants to humiliate Shamsi
well done brother Shamsi may Allah protect you
Ameen ya Rabb!
We need more people to refute extremists
Salamun Alaiqum. May Allah grant you good health and long life.
Great one brother Shamsi
I ADVICE BROTHER Shamsi to watch the debates of sheikh Muzamil Fakeeri hafidaho Allah because there are lot of lessons and information that can help you to expose the enemies of Islam
Never say or imply anything negative towards Saudi? Oh Ya Saidi your Bounaries are seen from a distance!!
What is meant by bouanaries?
it has nothing to do about Saudi or turkey the prophet peace be upon him said "whome ever wants to give advice to leaders he should do it in private" and Ibn abbas said "don't talk about leaders badly if they are aren't infront of you"
but you people don't wanna follow Quran and sunnah just like shis ya Ali ya hussain we tell him the prophet said don't pray to anyone but Allah and they say why you don't talk about Saudi! !!! boy you on shirk akbar Saudi on sin if you both day they go jannah you go hell
Brothers need to advice shamsi with regards to advising Muslim leaders privately
It’s not about advising them privately when you go against the government the whole country falls and it gets much worse when the west intervene
What you think shamsi is a airplane?
What leaders ? Al saud ? 🤦♂️ they are the reason for all the troubles
Sellout 🐩 🐶
The PROPHET MUHAMMAD PEACE BE UPON HIM SAID ADVICE THE LEADER PRIVATELY NOT SHAMSI
Is he ganno send them a message on Facebook ? 😂
لا إلهَ إلا اللهُ وَحْدَهُ لا شَرِيكَ لَهُ ، لَهُ المُلْكُ وَ لَهُ الحَمْدُ
يُحْيِي وَ يُمِيتُ وَ هُوَ حَيٌّ لا يَمُوْتُ بِيَدِهِ الخَيْرُ وَ إليهي مصير وَهُوَ عَلَى كل شيء
قادر
وأشهد أن محمدا عبده ورسوله صلى الله
عليه وسلم اللهم صل على
سيدنا
محمد النبي الأمي
وعلى آله وصحبه وسلم
That grey hair gentleman look like malaysian
Bro why everyone is talking about leadership fix your Salah first
You talk nonsense. Salah is debt to Allah swt. But if you dont have real understanding of tauhid like shamsi this ex sufi donkey it is normal. All Messengers came with the same important message first before do Salah. Learn tauhid.
Best advice you get it
My salah is fixed am I allowed to establish tawheed now sir?
You absolute 🤡
Why talking about hizbis and protests, fix your salah first
brother Shamsi should grow out of critisizing other du'at in the field and realise that no human is immuned of mistakes
You are right. Everyone makes mistakes.
The difference is, the ones he refute don't believe they are making mistakes and they stand by their beliefs
Look for the video
"why the people of sunnah refute innovators more than non Muslims - Shaykh Salih aal-alshaykh" on the daarusSunnah channel
May Allah guide me and you
may Allah guide you, islam refutes misguidance, we muslims are not gonna tolerate terrorism, we will continue to refute misguidance and mistakes, insha Allah
Chamsi bro live youuuu
😂
3thrd usul of madaakhila:
The madaakhila believe that if you worship Allah and you worship besides Allah the moon out of ignorance than you are still a muslim, muwahid, monotheist. The proof of the madaakhila is the hadith when the sahabi Mu'aadh ibn jabal returned from shaam and visited the prophet, mu'aadh made sujud to the prophet out of respect for him pbuh.
But the prophet pbuh did not takfir Mu'aadh for this because mu'aadh was according the madaakhila jaahil.
So therefor if for instance a man makes sujud to grave and ask the dead person to heal him out of ignorance then he is excused just as mu'aadh was excused.
hadha kadhib
@@Kazim058 go ask shamsi
Why shams throwing up the hand sign of the 🤘 😈 he does this alot y
He does it subconsciously!
I don't understand why Shamsi doesn't denounce Saudi for its close relationship with India and Modi. It seems like only Arab Muslim blood is worth defending but South Asian Muslims are worthless.
Usul of madaakhila is:
1st: According to the shayk of shamsi, shayk abu khadeeja, a taghut (...wich we are commanded by Allah to reject and make kufr of...) can be a muslim too.
Question:
Where in the quran or sunnah is stated that a taghut can be a muslim too ?
You are calling abu khadeejah a kafir. Are you a takiri?
Bring your evidence. Don't just make bold statements
U just called abu khadeejah a taghut..bring your evidence or remain silent...The other person called you out 5 days ago..where are you now?
Where in the quran or sunnah is a taghut called a muslim?
@@southernrealist5789 where did he make takfir of him? learn to read
Taghut is the one changing the law of Allah, not ruling with sharia doesn`t take the leader out of islam! Go read commentary of ibn abbas about kufr duna kufr, so don’t try t justify youre takfiri behaviour 🤣🤡 alhamdulillah i am more for sharia then you are but stick to the sunnah. Don’t slander sheikh rabee al madkali, alhamdulillah for the sunnah, we expose the jokeman khawarij😋
Brother Shamsi Turkey is the only sunni country to send its own soldiers into syria to help the sunnis
First he said may Allah guide leader of Turkey. He pointed out shirk is permissible in Turkey. Is this OK with you?
Shirk is not permissible is Saudi. Are you not happy with this?
May Allah guide me and you
Hahaha you mean terrorists of An-Nusra?
@@mohdsadiq.salafi where’s your proof?
Why Turkey Don't send soldiers to free Palestine??!
Good joke
Shamsi is full of it
0:40 so called (Freudian slip) " you are kharigi Kafir "
Did you open his chest and peek into his heart subhana allah
@@DZMegamind
Did you ?
@@elyamkhan6299 am not the one making assumptions
Karijis aren't Kaffirs automatically, it can't be a Freudian slip as it doesn't make sense in the first place.
Kharijis are takfiris is what he meant don't be stupid
@@zakaria87100 Some ulema say that the khawarij aren’t Muslims
Shamsi is just a preacher. Not a debator. Very knowledgeable. People loose interest if just preach it's boring. Even if preaching is intention engage with Audience
Shamsi does debate non Muslims but he doesn't open up the debates to nonsense. He keeps it short and to the point. If the person persists after the evidence has been established, there is no need to continue. I've seen most Muslims in speakers corner have pointless debates for hours.
As for debating Muslims, once a Muslim stands firm on a deviant position then it is not from the trails of the people of sunnah to debate with the innovators.
Imām Ahmad Ibn Hanbal (rahimahullāh) said in the beginning of his Usool as-Sunnah: “Do not sit with the people of desires (deviation), and do not argue with them or debate with them.” This is Ahmad ibn Hanbal in the third century, he died in the year 241 after the Hijrah
There is no need to debate for more than 100 points 🙂 if the case is proven once or twice, thats it why keep going on? Waste of time.
Their imam sheikh madkali claim he is better them imam bukhari
Shame on you liar
Let me bring you evidence shamsi. From the QURAN.
"They have taken their rabbis and monks as well as the Messiah, son of Mary, as lords besides Allah,1 even though they were commanded to worship none but One God. There is no god ˹worthy of worship˺ except Him. Glorified is He above what they associate ˹with Him˺!"
9:31
Ibn kathir states in his tafsir:
(They took their rabbis and their monks to be their lords besides Allah...) that the Christians and Jews obeyed their monks and rabbis in whatever they allowed or prohibited for them. This is why Allah said,
وَمَآ أُمِرُواْ إِلاَّ لِيَعْبُدُواْ إِلَـهاً وَحِداً
(while they were commanded to worship none but One God), Who, whatever He renders prohibited is the prohibited, whatever He allowed is the allowed, whatever He legislates, is to be the law followed, and whatever He decides is to be adhered to;
لاَّ إِلَـهَ إِلاَّ هُوَ سُبْحَـنَهُ عَمَّا يُشْرِكُونَ
(None has the right to be worshipped but He. Hallowed be He above what they associate (with Him).) Meaning, exalted, sanctified, hallowed above partners, equals, aids, rivals or children, there is no deity or Lord worthy of worship except Him.
So those who prohibit what Allah has made halal and permit what Allah had made haram is calling to the worship of other than Allah, hence he's a Taghut. And those who follow them in obedience willingly are mushrik.
If you hate someone call him khawarij it's not necessary for someone evil to be khawarij.
In politics a Man robs his own house and blames the neighbours.
They are extremists and terrorists causing people to die either directly or by their preaching
this is my conclusion.
Allah has body parts
A Sheen hands feats eyes side face and curly hair and he prays like a Muslim.
He is a man.
The Quran wil also come like a pale man the eternal Quran is also a man.
Then you got a stone that can forgive sins and Muslim pray in its direction an kiss it.
What is islam the belive in two GODMEN
And a god stone a idol.
And Mohammad died and never resurrected.
The guy that promise virgens in Yamna.
Never came back
This is islam in short
Do you see the problem.
Watch
What a silly old fool is sheik rabee3 ibn oumayr madkhali
He is a 90 year old scholar from medina. But subhana wllah no one knows him in the muslim ummah. Cause Allah didnt give him that. Only his folowwers know him. He is poison for tje ummah
Rabee madkhali is poison and doviding the muslims
What are u talking about...so many ppl know him.
Your point is false and even if it were true it would still be weak.
Indeed there are 100s of companions of the prophet (PBUH) that many muslims dont know.
Does that mean that they were not good muslims?
To the contrary they are among the best to have ever lived.
fear Allah and don't bring palestine into this, we obviously can't say too much but lets say that any kind of self defence of palestine was major part not from the "muslim countries" of our's. and they wouldn't have needed to take help from outside sources if muslim countries weren't busy giving their money to those that kill muslim in palestine and china.
again fear Allah, i do not support the iranian regime but don't dare spew the retoric of the people who justify putting their hand with the hand of those that kill the muslims and destroy the aqsa. seriously i know people say "fear Allah" a lot but this time i very much mean it, fear allah.
becuase with this twisted narrative, you do not put Allah first, you put certain political parties first which is frankly disgusting.
It's spelt Allah with a capital A and Muslim with a capital M. Why do you put Muslim countries with inverted commas? Do you believe they are lands of kufr? It is upon you to bring any scholars of Ahlus Sunnah who agree with you in this. Who are you to comment on the decisions of the ruler? Musnad Ahmad 14909 clearly states that the rulers are advised in private, not out loud in front of fulan and 'allan. BarakAllahu feek, may Allah guide you to Salafiyyah
@@ponderingspirit1475 may Allah guide me and keep on guiding me to the straight path period. did the prophet say salafiyyah? i don't think so.
we follow the Allah, the prophet, the sahaba , then the salaf and the athar.
i have no problem with that, i also don't call rebellion or even making takfeer.
it's just a simple fact that most "muslim" countries are not ACTUAL muslim countries, they are secular countries with a lot of muslims, in fact in some of those countries muslims are second if not theird class citizens.
who am i to comment on the decision of the ruler? what can i now not call batel batel? i can't call fahisha, fahisha? i can't enjoin on good and forbid evil...ow that's true i can't, i would be in jail far faster than if i actually did sins.
btw i'm not even calling what the rulers do as fahisha and or batel, but just telling the people that were allowed by the government to do this fahisha and batel, advising them even if it's allowed by the government that they shouldn't do it would land you in jail.
in fact one of our fellow brothers a daai in egypt who makes simple videos of comparative religion and showing chrstians (all on the internet and showing books and such rather than targetting folks) the truth.
and he was jailed TWICE the second for 2 years on false charges with zero proof for making christians feel "uncomfortable" while their bishop or whatever he is called is mocking islam and saying it is a violent religion spread by the sword in the middle of the capital of egypt.
this is one example among many many many examples.
btw all of this and in my comment i didn't even mention the decisions of rulers, i just stated that people in palestine who are defending themselves wouldn't have had to take support from iran if these "muslim" countries weren't too busy supporting who are killing the muslims.
am i not allowed to state facts now? i am now a khawarij for stating simple facts and not to slander our muslim brothers defending themselves and al aqsa?
what brother, is that simple for you to put me in a catagory of people you think my blood is halal to spill?
btw, i never called anybody names, to me they are childish marji or whatever that was called, salafi, athari all of these terms are childish when used in such situations to separate people.
i understand if you want to use themfor educational purposes when you are studying formally but really ultimately we go back to the quran and sunnah.
i tell you also to fear Allah, stop doing what you claim others are doing and stop slandering people. it's already difficult for us who are practicing islam in muslim lands much less trying to set us up and trying to justify killing us.
just like brother shamsi said, enemy of my enemy is my friend, who do you think it helps when you take down the people who resist in palestine and slander them? is it haram for them to do business with the only entity they can take support from, but it is halal for others to take support from forget kuffar but literal enemies of islam even though they have a lot of options?
and again, I my self am not saying it's halal or haram, in fact i can see why muslim countries may seem to have options but in reality are forced to put their hands with the kuffar.
what I AM saying is that why do you people give that privilage to some groups and not others? why is one leadership have a green ticket of halal to do so but not the other?
@@PoeticSonic Kind of true. We have secular countries with a Muslim population. To be honest you can't defend any "Muslim" country these days except the ones that are having the worst end of it like Yemen and Palestine I think.
@@therealgunny it's not even about defending, they don't want us to say anything that states certain leadership is wrong, ironically they don't mind when the leadership is not a puppet state but then they would basically say your blood is halal to spill if you even dare to mention something that a clearly puppet leadership/leader is doingvery haram things.
for an example and again i have no affiliations for neighther of them, i recognise that this is politics and there are things we don't know, nor am i calling for any rebellion but why is it not okay for hamas or actually the many different palestinian organisations that defend the palestinians against the kuffar (vast majority of israeli people are athiests but are ethnically "jewish") are called against for taking weapons and so on from iran even though they don't allow shia tetoric inside gaza and the actually do not allow shiasm at all. and most importantly are the LEADERS of gaza and iran was the only ones who offered any help.
yet we can't talk about leaders who are free to chose from where to get support yet they exclusivly chose to take support from kuffor powers.
or maybe our brothers don't recognise palstine or palestinians as an entity, maybe they see gaza as an area of israel so they will on;y recognise a leader for the muslims only after they are apointed by israel....
even if you say iran is a kuffry state, at the very least they aren't destroying the aqsa as we speak or killing/torturing and inslaving over 2 million muslims.
again, i can understand how maybe it apears to us as layman's that these muslim countries can chose from wherever they want but actually they are forced to take "support" from kuffry states.
what i am asking them is to keep some consistancy and not to be hypocrites and it pains me to call them names like this but i have seen shamsi and those that are like him say the same thing many times against palestinians and those that defend palestine and Al Aqsa.
if you have nothing good to say then stay silant. isn't that what they tell us? then again keep the same energy.
btw i my self normally keep silant, i am too much of a layman both islamically and politically to talk about it and from the little i can see rebelion in this day and age wil jsut cause more fitna, i actually agree with them.
in this case i was just defending the honor of the palestinians and those that are defending them, as they have been slandered by shamsi and his like multiple times.
i know at least for shamsi he isn't doing it out of maliciousness, i'm am just trying to wake him up and those that are like him.
if i am wrong, please advise me, and explain to me. i might be week in certain things and sin, but if am sinning or incorrect then i am humble enough to accept it as ultimatily what i care about more than my ego getting hurt is not going to the hellfire.
@@PoeticSonic I have read the Quran cover to cover but studying Quran is different than reading it so I'm a layman myself too. I don't disagree with you, all of the Muslim countries have done some good and some bad. Sometimes the bad prevails over the good and vice versa. I just wish Muslims were united and if any Muslim state is in a bad shape, there is no one to blame but ourselves at the end, because we let others to divide us.
I don't want to spread hatred by saying that Shamsi is defending this or that but I don't agree with him that Saudis are the best to follow while they're the biggest buyers of weapon in the world from west and the relations they have with them.
We can be wrong we can be right. Best thing to do is to follow the Quran and the Prophet to our best of abilities. We all harvest what we plant just like how the Quran says.
Hypocrisy of shamsi. Don't say anything about Saudi leaders but then attacks turkiye leader for the same crimes as mbs
Hypocrisy it's part of every human everyone has mistake we are besher .
Shamsi may have mistakes and sometimes he doesn't know what he saying it's okay but mostly (about religion he is right ) because he is not politically educated person and it's something good 👍
Dumbass shamsi have Said that the Saudi are not good leaders
@@94A4.GH01 you overdated shit. You missed the point
They don’t allow all the other bs tho
And where he says any thing against the turkiye rulers.. open your ears and listen again what he is saying..
But shamsi mocked Hussain which makes him khawarij?
Look for the video Mohammed hijab character assassination or sincere advice.
Shamsi never intended any disrespect to the sahabi and repent straight away even the Shia acknowledged his repentance. Hijab intended disrespect to the sahabi and never repented.
Also a khariji (rebel) is someone who does kharooj (rebels) against a leader. Hussain alaihi a Salam was not a ruler.
I'm sorry for you, MH deceived you
Shamsi repented in the same clip that MH brought, but MH has no honesty and he is just a liar wants to humiliate Shamsi
Islamic emirat of Afghanistan ☝🏾🕋🏳️🏳️🏳️
نعمسي شيتسي
We need more people to refute extremists