19:59 Shamsudeen is speaking the truth. I remember him warning against ISIS in 2013, many months before they declared their fake Khilaafah and became famous.
@@mahidurrahman4268I don't know about shamsi specifically, but this is a playlist of the scholars warning against the terrorists many years ago: ruclips.net/p/PL0C6AD46517A85694
1:36 well said, getting people keep talking about the kingdom while people aren't concern about their own behaviour, people should focus on to themselves and pls stop bad mouthing KSA ☝️
Well said Ustadh Shamsi. The Khawarij have destroyed the minds of the young generation. The thing they like the most is to speak about leaders. May Allah guide us and them.
@@Gorborothh first of all let us lay down some principles. In order to understand the book of Allah and the Sunnah of the Messenger then we go back to the understanding of the companions RadiyAllahu’anhum. Then Allah and his Messenger sullAllahu alayhi wassalam praised the first three generations of Muslims so we follow them. And also commiting a major sin other than Shirk does not take one outside the fold of Islam except for abandonment of the prayer (however there is a difference of opinion on this issue but I follow the view of Imam Ahmad Rahimahullah that complete abandonment of the prayer exits one front the fold of Islam) Do you agree with all of the above? (You don’t have to agree with the difference of opinion I stated)
The Prophet [SAW] said: "The extinction of the whole world is less significant before Allah than killing a Muslim man." Reference: Sunan an-Nasa'i 3987 In-book reference: Book 37, Hadith 22 English translation: Vol. 5, Book 37, Hadith 3992 Grade: Hasan (Darussalam)
Erdugan is still a muslim leader. He has a lot of khayr in him. And turkish people love him. He talked about Islam in secularized Turkey Alhamdulillah. May Allah guide him more.
I love shamsi he refutes all the false beliefs using quran and sunnah always, I've seen many people on camera accept islam through him however whenever yemen is brought up I see a different side of him. He says Yemenis were killing sunnis but the sunnis that were dying were Yemenis too. Be specific don't group us all with the houthis. In many videos whenever someone brings up the yemen and saudi conflict he talks about yemen like we're the enemies of Islam. We love our religion alhamdulilah we love Allah, our beloved prophet his companions and wives too. He acts like the war is about religion when its clear a political conflict 1 major factor is bab al mandab. Like I said I love the brother but it hurts sometimes when he talks about Yemenis as if we're savages.
In this case , about Turkey , Pakistan....etc is only media 🤔 As he was saying that what is been said about Saudi is just media ,and we need to be careful . Using the word is media whenever it suits 🙂
Want 10 lectures more. Don't want orthodox Kwarij lectures but try to relate it to real life today's events. I have observed enemies of Islam are the only one who benefit from this doomer self destructive Kwariji mentality.
The great scholar, Ibn al-Qayyim wrote, in explanation of the reality that the actions of the servants become manifest in those placed in authority over them, this being from the Divine wisdom: And reflect in His, the Most High's wisdom in making the kings of the servants, their leaders and their rulers to be of the same species as the actions [of the servants]. Rather, it is as if their actions became manifest in the appearances of their rulers and kings. If they remain upright, then their kings will remain upright, and if they turn away (from uprightness), then they (the kings) too will turn away from uprightness. And if they (the servants) oppress [themselves and others], then their kings and rulers will oppress [them]. And if their appears plotting and deception from them, their rulers will [be made to] behave likewise, and if they (the servants) prevent the rights of Allaah that are between themselves and become miserly with respect to them (i.e. withhold the rights of each other), then their kings and their rulers will withhold the right that they (the servants) have upon them and will become miserly with respect to them. And if they take from the one who is considered weak, what they do not deserve to take from him in their dealings (i.e. misappropriate from him), then the kings will take from them (the servants) what they do not deserve to take (from them) and will inflict them with taxes. And everything that they (the servants) take away from the weak person, the kings will take away from them with power, force. So their actions (those of the servants) become manifest in their actions (those of the kings and rulers). And it is not from the Divine wisdom that the evil-doers and the sinners are made to be ruled over [by anyone] except by one who is of their like. And when the very first band (of Islaam) was the best of the generations, and the most pious of them, then their rulers were likewise. And when they became tarnished (i.e. corrupted), the Rulers were made corrupted over them. Thus, the wisdom of Allaah refuses that the likes of Mu'aawiyah, and 'Umar bin 'Abdil-'Azeez are put in authority over us in the likes of these times [the 8th Century Hijrah], let alone the likes of Abu Bakr and 'Umar. Rather, our rulers are in accordance with our (nature) and the rulers of those before us were in accordance with their (nature).
So what if a leader who is regarded as a muslim (erdogan) openly praises democracy and is eager to stick to it even if europe and america abolishes it in their own countries, is he still regarded as a muslim? According to the Murjiah we have to consider his intention. But according to Qur'an and Sunnah, we have to judge by the zahir.
I donot defend the khawarij nor am I a khwarij . But yes i will tell you for sure that saudi is following the footsteps of American culture and now the latest thing that happened in saudi arabia on new year eve was astonishing. All the muslims from world look to saudi Arabia because we have the holy kabba and madinah there that's the reason it hurts when they go against the Allah and HIS beloved Prophet S a
Speaking out against a Muslim ruler can be seen as worse. Because the one who influences others with his speech will be accountable for influencing them to think the same and go further and act upon it. There is no excuse. The quran and sunnah are clear. Here are just "some": Imam Al-Nawawi’s Riyad-us-SaliheenChapter 80. Obligation of Obedience to the Ruler in what is Lawful and Prohibition of Obeying them in what is Unlawful Allah, the Exalted, says:“O you who believe! Obey Allah and obey the Messenger (Muhammad (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam)), and those of you (Muslims) who are in authority.” (4:59) 663. Ibn `Umar (May Allah be pleased with them) reported: The Prophet (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) said, “It is obligatory upon a Muslim to listen (to the ruler) and obey whether he likes it or not, except when he is ordered to do a sinful thing; in such case, there is no obligation to listen or to obey.”[Al-Bukhari and Muslim]. 664. Ibn `Umar (May Allah be pleased with them) reported: Whenever we took a pledge of allegiance to Messenger of Allah (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) to hear and obey, he (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) would say to us, “As far as you are capable of.”[Al-Bukhari and Muslim]. 665. Ibn `Umar (May Allah be pleased with them) reported: Messenger of Allah (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) said, “One who withdraws his hand from obedience (to the Amir) will find no argument (in his defense) when he stands before Allah on the Day of Resurrection; and one who dies without having sworn allegiance will die the death of one belonging to the Days of Ignorance.’‘[Muslim].Another narration is: The Messenger of Allah (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) said, “He who dies having defected from obedience (to the Amir) and discards his association with the main body of the (Muslim) community, dies the death of one belonging to the Days of Jahiliyyah.” 666. Anas (May Allah be pleased with him) reported: The Messenger of Allah (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) said, “Hear and obey even if an Abyssinian slave whose head is like a raisin is placed in authority over you.”[Al-Bukhari]. 667. Abu Hurairah (May Allah be pleased with him) reported: The Messenger of Allah (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) said, “It is obligatory upon you to listen and obey the orders of the ruler in prosperity and adversity, whether you are willing or unwilling, or when someone is given undue preference to you.”[Muslim]. May Allah guide me and you
@@southernrealist5789 well we are being taught to speak against the amir if he is not acting according to quran and sunnah . Some of the companions of Prophet S. a W were talking about Umar R a about his being Amir over muslimeen one said what if umar did not rule according to Quran and Sunnah. I don't remember the name of the other companion he stood up and took out his sword and said by Allah if he did not go according to quran and sunnah our swords will make him go according to quran and sunnah . Upon hearing this Umar r a thanked Allah and said Glory belongs to Allah that he has made some people among us to straighten umar . Well we are at the urge of end times so these fitnas from such countries can be expected. Saudi is changing and they are going astray.
@@southernrealist5789 You are shameless. If you quote the quran, do it fully or don't do it: "Then, if you quarrel about something, revert it back to Allah and the Messenger, if you believe in Allah and the Last Day. That is good, and the best at the end." It's not just ; those of you who are in authority, you must obey. It's MUSLIMS who are APPROVED by the MAJORITY of scholars. Not just any ruler. And what do we do if many say he is wrong? We go back to the prophet(pbuh) and Allah, meaning the sunnah and the quran. The authority of a ruler is null and void if he makes the ummah differs upon his rulings, or behaviour. His legitimacy is another thing entirely, but onwards, a ruler has every possibility to be deposed by the learned amongst muslims if they see non-islamic actions from him or his rulings
@@Ersilay this response is for anyone reading the comments and not an attempt to convince someone that clearly looks for ways to meet his desires Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamā’ah believe that rebellion against the rulers is forbidden The consensus of Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamā’ah, Ahlul-Hadīth the Salafiyyūn from the early books of ‘aqeedah (creed) and manhaj (methodology) is that rebellion and uprising against the rulers of the Muslims is forbidden. The two Imāms, Abu Hātim Ar-Rāzi (d. 277H) and Abu Zur’ah Ar-Rāzi (d. 264H) among countless others recorded this ijmā’ (agreement of the scholars) in the famous work ‘Aqeedatur-Rāziyain: “We hold that it is impermissible to rebel against the rulers…” The Imāms, along with those who came before them (such as Bukhāri, Ahmad, Sufyān, Fudayl, etc) recorded this consensus once it was settled, based upon the clear cut evidence in the Book, authentic Sunnah and statements of the kibār among the Sahābah. And no one has opposed this position in the ‘aqeedah since that time until now except an ignoramus or a misguided innovator. Rebellion (khurooj) is defined as attempting to snatch away authority from the ruler, opposing him publicly, attempting to force him out of office, inciting the people against him (through demonstrations, rallies, public protests, strikes, etc), plotting against him and rising up to challenge him with writings, sermonising or the sword. All of this is considered as khurooj. The Prophet (ﷺ) prohibited it in clear and decisive narrations. Narrations that cannot possibly be opposed by desires, opinion and reason or by the erroneous judgements of men, regardless of their station the sight of the people. The Messenger (ﷺ) spoke from revelation and those after him did not. For this reason, when the ijmā’ (consensus) was settled upon, no one disagreed with it except the Khawārij, the Shi’ah, the Mu’tazilah and their offshoots until this time of ours. Muslim reported in his Sahīh (1847) from Wā’il Ibn Hujr that: Salamah Ibn Yazeed Al-Ju’fee asked Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ): “O Prophet of Allah, what do we do if we have rulers over us who demand their rights yet they withhold our rights?” He replied: “Listen to them and obey them [regardless]. Upon them is their burden and on you will be your burden.” Bukhāri (7054) and Muslim (1849) reported from Ibn ‘Abbās (may Allah be pleased with him) that the Prophet (ﷺ) said: “Whoever sees from his leader something that he dislikes, then let him be patient with him because whosoever separates from the jamā’ah (i.e. the body of Muslims in a country) even by a handspan, and then dies in that condition, he will die the death of pre-Islamic ignorance (jāhiliyyah).” Al-Hāfidh Ibn Hajr said in explanation of this hadeeth that Ibn Abī Jamrah Al-Andulūsi (d. 599H) said: “The meaning of ‘separation’ is to attempt to break the covenant of allegiance that was attained for this leader - even if one splits away by the smallest degree. So, he gave the similitude of a handspan because even that amount will lead to the spilling of blood without due right.” (Al-Fath 13/7) It is for this reason that the Imām of Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamā’ah, Ahmad Ibn Hanbal (d. 241H) stated in his work, Usūlus-Sunnah as is recorded in Sharhu Usūlil-I’tiqād of Al-Lālikā’ee (1/161): “It is not permissible for anyone among the people to fight the ruler and nor to rise up against him. And whosoever does that is an innovator, upon other than the Sunnah and upon other than the Straight Path.” Obedience to the ruler, whether he is righteous, pious, sinful or tyrannical is an obligation. Muslim reported in his Sahīh (1836) from Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) that the Prophet (ﷺ) said: “You are obligated to listen to the ruler and obey him in times of ease and in times of hardship, whether you are pleased or displeased and even when another person is given preference over you (while you were more deserving).” Muslim also reported (1059) from Anas Ibn Mālik (may Allah be pleased with him) that Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) stated: “You will see after me severe preferential treatment (to those less deserving than you), so be patient until you meet Allah and you meet His Messenger at the drinking lake (Al-Hawd).” So they responded, “We shall be patient.” In the wording reported by Al-Bukhāri (2377) Anas added: “But we (i.e. some of the Muslims) were not patient.” So this is proof that those who were not able to be patient, were mistaken in their judgement because the truth is what Allah’s Messenger commanded with. Obedience to the ruler is obligatory in that which is not sinful, and rising up against him due to his sins or oppression is not permitted by ijmā’ (consensus) as recorded in the books of ‘aqeedah of the early Salaf as well as the authentic Sunnah. And we should not be concerned with the emotional screams of the opposers of the Sunnah and the innovators such as Al-Ikhwān Al-Muslimoon, the followers of Hasan Al-Banna, Sayyid Qutb and Al-Mawdūdi and their modern-day offshoots from the political groups, parties and agitators, those who march for “social justice” and “removal of oppression” and incite the people against the rulers. All of that eventually leads to the spilling of innocent blood, the collapse of societies, the breakdown of law and order, the loss of Religion and Religious education for a generation or more! And Allah’s aid is sought against these political agitators, the destroyers of security and religion. They are as Imām Ahmad Ibn Hanbal (may Allah have mercy upon him) stated: “Whoever does that is an innovator, upon other than the Sunnah and upon other than the Straight Path.” Ibn Abī ‘Āsim reported in As-Sunnah (1026) and Ibn Hibbān in his Sahīh (4062) from ‘Ubādah Ibn Sāmit (may Allah be pleased with him) that Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) said: “Listen to the ruler and obey him when it is hard for you and when it is easy for you, whether you are pleased or displeased, and when others are given preference over you, and even when they consume your wealth and beat your back.” (Delared sahīh by Al-Albāni; see Dhilāl Al-Jannah and At-Ta’līqāt Al-Hisān). This is what the Prophet of Allah (ﷺ) commanded the Sahābah with - that they were not to rebel or to rise up against the rulers even if others were given preference over them, and their wealth was taken away from them wrongfully, and they were beaten in their backs! So who has the right to say that they are not obligated by the command of the Messenger (ﷺ)?! Or that they are more worthy to stand up to social injustice and oppression than the Sahābah?! The Sahābah had to be patient and bear the tyranny, injustice and open sinful practices of the rulers, but 1,400 years later, these political activists, demonstrators, rebels and Ikhwānis cannot obey the Prophet?! Shaikh Al-Islām Ibn Taymiyyah (may Allah’s mercy be upon him) said: “Being patient with the tyranny of the rulers is a fundamental principle (asl) from the fundamentals of Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamā’ah.” (Majmoo’ Al-Fatāwa 28/179) And this saying of Ibn Taymiyyah is in accordance and harmony with the ahādeeth of the Messenger (ﷺ). Ibn Abī ‘Āsim reported in As-Sunnah (2/508) from ‘Adiyy Ibn Hātim (may Allah be pleased with him) that we said: “O Messenger of Allah, we do not ask you regarding obedience to the ruler who has taqwā (who is pious and who fears Allah), and is good and rectifies. Rather, we are asking about the ruler who does such-and-such and such-and-such?“ And he mentioned their evil traits. So the Prophet (ﷺ) answered: “Fear Allah! Listen to the ruler and obey him.” (Also reported by At-Tabarāni in Al-Kabīr, 17/101, and authenticated by Al-Albāni in Dhilāl Al-Jannah) Al-Imām Ibn Taymiyyah (d. 728H) stated: “There have not been a people who revolted against their ruler except that their condition after their rebellion was worse than before they rebelled.” (Minhāj As-Sunnah 3/231) Is this not the constant reality of affairs even up until our times? Look at the uprisings and revolutions that have taken place across the Muslim world, between 2008 and 2019. What has been the condition of the people after these uprisings? Death, terror, upheaval and destruction! Yet the political activists and their so-called “liberal” allies call for more and more demonstrations, rallies and revolutions! The Muslims need to wake up and return the Sunnah of their Prophet (ﷺ)! The great Imām of the early Salaf, Yunus Ibn ‘Ubayd, stated: “It is amazing to see a person calling to the Sunnah in our time. And what is more amazing is the one who answers the call to the Sunnah.” (Abu Nu’aym in Hilyatul-Awliyā, 3/21, Ibn Battah in Al-Ibānah, no. 20 and Al-Lālikā’i, nos. 21-23) Al-Hasan narrated saying: Allah’s Messenger mentioned the rulers and the evil rulers, the leaders and the evil leaders. He mentioned that the misguidance and deviation of some of them will fill what is between the sky and the earth! So he was asked: “O Messenger of Allah, should we not strike them with the sword??” He replied: “No. So long as they the pray the prayer, then no.” (Reported by Al-Imām Nu’aym Ibn Hammād (died 239H) in Kitāb Al-Fitan, 1/185, no. 491) Let those who step forth and oppose these texts, narrations, methodology and belief receive tidings that they are from Ahlul-Bid’ah, opposers of the Sunnah, the Hadīth and Salaf.
@@southernrealist5789 It's not that I don't agree with those hadiths. Just that you're misusing them. I told you already what was required to be a ruler. I'll make it simple for you with 2 questions: Can a non-muslim be a leader for the muslims? Can the scholars make takfir of the leader if they bring forth proofs? We all agree that as long as the leader is muslim, we must bear him even if he's bad at the post. But I'll ask you again a few other questions: What is required of a ruler to be admitted as leading the muslims? At what point the actions of the ruler allows others to make takfeer of him? You think the ruler as being untouchable no matter what but it's simply is not true. This remains the case as long as he remains a practicing muslim, the usual actions that leads to kufr makes him no longer able to be the leader and another must be chosen in his place.
Who from the selef explained that the one who sinned like shaving the beard, did not ruled by what Allah has revealed. Who from the selef said that if you sinned, than you did not rule with that wich Allah has revealed.
So are you saying that leaving your beard is not part of the legislation that Allah revealed? If it is part of Allah's revelation, then certainly shaving the beard, is NOT ruling by what Allah has revealed.
@@abdullahbenhassan The one who acknowlegde the hukm of Allah that it is haram but out of hawaa he still shaves knowing and acknoweleging that what he is doing is haram, did he ruled by what Allah has revealed?
@@foufoua the action he Committed of shaving the beard is NOT ruling by what Allah has revealed. But that does not necessarily make him a dhaalim, faasiq or a kafir. I dont know if i can be any clearer. He is not ruling by what Allah has revealed. But since he acknowledges it is sinful, he is no kafir at all. Wa allahu a3lam. And also i dont understand why you see this as a type of irjaa of brother shamsi
@@abdullahbenhassan your saying: "commiting the sin of shaving the beard is NOT ruling what Allah has revealed". Bring me one of the selef who said this. Bring one of the selef that said commiting a sin is NOT ruling with what Allah has revealed. I say that anyone who acknowledges the rule of Allah, believing in it, he has ruled with that wich Allah has revealed.
People who make takfir on millions of Muslims, people who takfir over the slightest of things. Does a name come to your mind? This is what abdul wahab did, he takfired millions and millions of Ottomans and Ottoman leaders, even the ones before him, and these khawarij today are his followers
Khawarij don't exist anymore. There are groups 10 times worst than khawarij. When Muslims don't Luke or don't agree each other, they start calling each other khawarij.
Where is the evidence in the 577 years from isa to mohammed of the original injeel given from allah to isa that is independent of the Christian scriptures?
Yeah but the point is there is a big difference between someone who is committing haram and he s trying to hide it and someone who is in charge and advertising and making rules for haram.
@@tayloryoung4974 No, i am not talking about this particular sin. But okay for example if someone shaves his beard he cant say to me:dont go to clubs or don't drink? may Allah forbid And can i say to him heyy don't tell me what is right and what is wrong because you are a sinner?
@@Ibrahim-de1gj Yes, there's obviously a difference between a sinner who hides it and one "in charge and advertising" ( even though I've never seen anyone telling his subjects to "go and commit Haram"). But I get what you mean that he allows it. Is that a more severe Haram than someone just individually sinning (open or hidden) ? Yes. Does that make the one in charge automatically Kafir? No.
@@StudentOfKnowldge i am with you brother, i am against rebellion. But at some point brother Shamsi may Allah bless him like he is saying that you cant even speak about the leaders.(this is what my first comment about)
Gaddafi is not kafr, he may be corrupt, but he is a Muslim, and also why did he lie? He did not say that the Green Book is like the Qur’an. Beware, there is a day of judgment. Do not make one of God’s servants your enemy on the Day of Judgment
The follower of the Qur’an finds that most of the punishments of nations were due to the spread of evil and the abandonment of the prohibition of evil, then my sun comes with all its glory and makes the matter of evil that has become widespread in Saudi Arabia.
what about those military intervention which alliance did in afghanistan, iraq where there thousands of dead civillians isnt one muslim life same as life from those countries which invaded
This guy doesn't know the law of Pakistan. In Pakistani law its mentioned that the ruler in the County is not the ruler in reality but Allah is the true ruler. And no law will be passed which is against quran and sunnah
Shamsi supports Saudi but when someone brings up their faults he says they're not Muhammad lol He's preaching to the masses to live in piety, and ignore the leaders. But leader's actions directly effect society as a whole.
@@linkup901ify Sure bro....you must also think Fauci is science lol Shamsi is not Islam, he has good arguments, and I agree about implementing sharia on yourself before thinking of leaders. But what if you do implement it on yourself? What if you're not speaking from a place of hypocrisy? What if the actions of leaders and elites is causing the most harm in society? Do you just become like the Christians and make Islam a "personal religion" Who will implement sharia on the leaders and elites with private jets and super yachts while people starve?
@@DocRealTalk If you come from these places of sincerity, then you are of the good muslims and shall enter jannah insha'Allah. As he said, we can not rebel against the leaders, just like Syria did. Shamsi also addressed this with hadith of 'Ali (ra) where someone came to him and said that the previous leaders such as 'Omar and Abu Bakr (ra) were better leaders. He said that is because from the people they were leading were people like me (Ali), Abu Bakr, Khalid and other sahaba. So even if that someone is as good as you say he is, then good for him. But atleast know that implementing shari'a especially with the west and enforcing laws in shari'a countries, it's not that easy ya akhi, without justifying our muslim leaders' actions. And if I'm being honest, even if that person you mentioned were to lead a muslim country, it will be hard on him aswell. Just like it was hard for 'Ali. Leading a country is no joke.
@@googleenjoyer1503 "We can not rebel against the leaders". That's a misconception, and a wide spread one. The leader must have some qualities to be in position in the first place. Being a muslim is one, being accepted is another, and then only on ruling matters, if he differs from the people but he checks the first 2 boxes we have to support it. So there are instances when the leader is effectively not one and can be removed from his position. The fact that you think a leader has all powers over the ummah is telling, even Muhammad(pbuh) while he was the leader in every sense of the term, spiritual, warring or political, on most matters concerning the last 2 subjects he asked advices from his companions when no clear injunctions from Allah was given to him pertaining a matter. So nowadays when shamsi doesn't even dare to criticize the "leader", it shows that not only has he never learned about the prophet's own life, but that he's a coward because he's deserving of at least critiques, if not more.
@@user-gz1yp2hu1f اجمع اجمع العلماء على حرمة المعازف لكن صاحبكم قال بأن حكم المعازف امر خلافي بين العلماء وهذا كذب واضح لقد اصبحتم رقم 1 في اقامة الحفلات الغنائية لدرجة ان الغرب تعجبوا منكم
@@mohammedatta4209 خسئت يكذاب ونعم فيه خلاف في حكم الاغاني ( ابن حزم - الغزالي )عندما كنا متشددين مازلتم تكرهوننا وعندما تركنا التشدد مازلتم تكرهوننا ! اراهن و اتحداك ان تنطق ب اسم بلدك لانه مليئ بالشرك و البدع التي هي اعظم من الموسيقى !
The song tunes/lyrics people sing too are clearly Shirki, the people who come to perform are mushriks So a different form of shirk is being promoted and protected by the saudi government and the silence of government paid ulama clearly makes them Ulama e Soo It's funny how shamsi finds justification for what saudi are doing and turns the debate into whats a bigger sin Difference is saudi is promoting vice in the name of tourism and silencing the opposing voice whereas those countries where misguided sects are carrying out their rituals are not government sponsored nor promoted by the government, there's also an equal voice opposing these acts Do people in saudi have the freedom to voice their concerns against the Haram being promoted by the government?
so why don't you say the same thing about Recep Tayip Erdoğan he is Muslim he allowed and encouraged hijap for Turkish women before him it was forbidden built thousand of mosques in Turkey and out side Turkey accepted more than 8 millions Syrian refugees as Ansar. you have to be fare brother Shamsi.
You are a weapon in the hand of non Muslims to destroy Islam . Salafia is the Islam salafia isn't belong to any person. It is belong to book of Allah and sunnah and understanding of salaf
FBI and MOSSAD agents literally blew up candles after watching their propganda of "Madkhali" is working well and Muslims is standing against another Muslim.
Syed Qutb who was a Freemason and as you perhaps know Freemasons are Zionists in essence. so who are their agents is quite clear. earlier they used to select the rawafidh for their fitnah. now they have selected fine mules like muslim brotherhood and isis to carry out their fitnah
What an evil irja from shamsi when he said that if a muslim prayes to someone else than Allah because he is ignorant, you cannot call him a kafir for this becaus he is jaahil. So this means that shirk akbar out of ignorance can be monotheism. لا حول ولا قوة إلا بالله
@@tayloryoung4974 no problem, watch from 14:26 min up untill 15:08. Shamsi says that the leaders of the ottomans were callers to shirk and when the guy asked if they were kafirs, shamsi says NO and this means that the ottoman leaders still were monotheists because a person is either a monotheist/muslim or a disbeliever. And the reason why the ottomans still were monotheists according to shamsi is because they were ignorant. Shamsi said that a condition to be removed before takfeer is the person being ignorant i.e the person must have knowledge that the action is shirk. I am using the term "monotheist" on purpose instead of "muslim" because every muslim is a monotheist but when you say that a muslim is praying to another besides Allah out of ignorance and you still call him a monotheist, then you will see how ridiculous this statement is.
@@foufoua Stop twisting his words you charlatan, he is speaking about establishing the proof on the individual, a muslim can fall into shirk akbar and as long as the PROOF isn't established against him he's still a Muslim, just like Muslim scholars don't make takfir on individuals from the rafida, if you think what shamsi said is irja then you must accuse all the scholars of islam who didn't make takfir on rafidi individuals of irja, shamsi clearly made his argument about not making takfir muayan on some ottoman rulers and if you think that's not valid then be prepared to accuse a lot Muslim scholars of irja. It is form the traits of the takfiri khawarij to accuse ahlu sunnah of irja, and you're definitely a takfiri and I don't need to hear anything from you to know that. "EvRrY mUsLiM iS a MoNoThEiT " there's no term such as "monotheist" in the sharia so stop using foreign terms ya jahil.
@@bilalsim124 really? So when u know someone calls upon Allah and besides Allah the person asks the dead for paradise out of ignorance, he is still a muwahid, a monotheist?
Shamsi shrinks it down to Anjem Choudry and a person to start shariah on a personal level... Great deception :) to divert thinking of a person... Shariah is about changing society as a whole... He is promoting as if he is Tablighi Jamaat philosophy that you need to change yourselves and not to give Dawah to non Muslims...
Have a listen to this lecture on Shamsi's channel "the nature of rule and rulership by Shaykh Abu iyaad" It will help you understand the difference between rulers and citizens May Allah guide me and you
@@fixlab3047 say what you want... only Allah SWT know who is me...we Malaysian all from ahlu sunnah mazhab as Syafie...i just say what i see...see what happen to ulama in Saudi when he complained about concerts in Saudi
I’m very sorry to say when it comes to Saudi Arabia Shamsi backs out on that countries wrong doings and justifies it by down playing issues that are presently going on in that country. Ya Saidi Brother Shamsi mentioned that Saudi opened a Night Club and people have an issue. It was not just a Nightclub. It was an international Dance Music Festival. With big Stars from the Music World like Cardi B, Justine Beiber and world renowned Dance Music DJ,s etc. Now also they did celebrate and allowed the kingdom to celebrate Halloween, record sales of Halloween Costumes. And very recently they have been Involved in allowing Meta Verse creator Zuckerberg (Facebook) to allow a form of Haj through Meta Verse and Sheikh Sudais has been seen or give the impression to a heads up. And no scholar would criticise that Government as they would be insulting the Royal Saudi Family (Homeboy Salman) (Mr Moderate Islam). If you are brothers are given questions on Saudi Arabia and you appear slimming away from that subject it is so visible. And there will be a time when you will have to answer, be it in this world or the next. Please be a group of integrity and answer properly, rather than throwing mist at the subject.
What's the difference between a night club and musical concerts? What's the difference if there are khaliji stars or international starts? It's the same sin in Islam ,and authorities are not forcing people to attend those events people go on their own. And no one also was forced to celebrate Halloween, people do it on their own, there's no public or official celebration of such an event ,people are just posting their personal celebrations on social media. As for the second part what's wrong with doing hajj in the metaverse? It seems like you just want to be angry at anyone or anything that comes in your way. Saudi is not perfect, however when it comes to Islamic priorities it is doing good because there are a lot of scholars and students of knowledge and there are a lot of Islamic universities and schools that gives Islamic training more than any country in the world, Islamic teachings are included in the curriculum since first grade... And no scholars don't criticize rulers because it's the way of ahlu sunnah, they instead make dua for their guidance and advice them privately, whether they accept advice not that's on them just like your kids might not accept your advice.
@@tayloryoung4974 I agree on many areas and your point of view is liberal. However TY they should should be setting an example as they are funding many Islamic Institutions around the world and as we know they have exported their brand of Aqueedah on many countries and even forced their school of thought in many a vulnerable Land. This criticism of them is vital. Now as Shamsi said you can criticise people or nations when it concerns the greater good. Also scholars of more of a high calibre than Shamsi know this but as you know they don’t want that knock on the door or their funding being stopped. Nobody is perfect and we all need to strive for that but that country is not getting any criticism just like Zionists do not criticise Israel.
@@salimchandia2110 No, criticizing Muslim leaders is from the aqeeda of ahlu sunnah, people of sunnah dont criticize Muslim leaders publicly because its part of their aqeeda not because saudi is funding them, if you think otherwise you need to bring proof or you'll be known as a slanderer.
@@tayloryoung4974 That’s the best way to cop out from an argument. Using Fiqh to justify what is going. I can get you proof but I am more concerned when you criticise other Muslim countries but not Saudi.. Double Standards. Remember when a country who holds keys to the Holy Sites and you cannot have the decency to observe to state that wrong is being taken place. And in the long run it will effect Saudi Arabia and the wider Muslim World. That is going against the Muslim Aqueedah, Islam and the teachings of the best of all creation MSAW. Come in brother stop being sterile. And think openly like the. Scholars of the who the leaders took advice. Not the ones who were forced to stay quiet and let the leaders oppress their people with Haram Festivals and pagan Traditions.
@@salimchandia2110 You can get no proof, and no we didn't criticize any Muslim country we are consistent with what we believe alhamdulilah. As for anything that happens in saudi Arabia it really is none of your concern, there're a lot of scholars and students of knowledge who advice the people and teach them the religion daily and command good and forbid evil and advice the rulers, saudi is not in need of you or anyone else they have their own men.
![Cordae - Saturday Mornings (feat. Lil Wayne) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/z2GYJua09F0/mqdefault.jpg)
People complain about saudi arabia but don't even pray. subhanallah
Always great to see a brother regularly making it clear on these kind of questions.
19:59 Shamsudeen is speaking the truth. I remember him warning against ISIS in 2013, many months before they declared their fake Khilaafah and became famous.
Is there a link you can provide for that?
@@mahidurrahman4268 We didn't record or livestream back in the day.
@@ikraamdaanis ok
@@mahidurrahman4268I don't know about shamsi specifically, but this is a playlist of the scholars warning against the terrorists many years ago: ruclips.net/p/PL0C6AD46517A85694
@@ftgttg3423 jazakallah
big up shamsi, mashAllah very beneficial video
One of the best 39 min of my day
Shamsi a very smart man. Great beneficial information
1:36 well said, getting people keep talking about the kingdom while people aren't concern about their own behaviour, people should focus on to themselves and pls stop bad mouthing KSA ☝️
Jazakum Allahu Khayran❤
Well said Ustadh Shamsi. The Khawarij have destroyed the minds of the young generation. The thing they like the most is to speak about leaders.
May Allah guide us and them.
Thats because the Quran says not to follow the laws of the tawaghit, do you have an issue with that?
@@Gorborothh no we have an issue with your understanding of who the Tawaaghet are and your false methodology in establishing Islam.
@@Salafiyahisthehaqq Who are they, according to you
@@Gorborothh first of all let us lay down some principles.
In order to understand the book of Allah and the Sunnah of the Messenger then we go back to the understanding of the companions RadiyAllahu’anhum.
Then Allah and his Messenger sullAllahu alayhi wassalam praised the first three generations of Muslims so we follow them.
And also commiting a major sin other than Shirk does not take one outside the fold of Islam except for abandonment of the prayer (however there is a difference of opinion on this issue but I follow the view of Imam Ahmad Rahimahullah that complete abandonment of the prayer exits one front the fold of Islam)
Do you agree with all of the above?
(You don’t have to agree with the difference of opinion I stated)
@@Salafiyahisthehaqq In Shaa Allah I will give you a proper reply al-layla ya akhi
Barak Allah feekum ya Akhi, may Allah protect you
BarakAllah'u feek akhi kareem 🌹☝🏼
Love my brother Shamsi 🤲🏼
Mash Allah may Allah reward Shamsi
wise words from shamsi.
The guy seems chad and quite heroic like Spiderman
Far from Haram
MashaAllah. Alhamdulillah ☝🏼🌹
Alhamdulillaah for Manhaj As Salaf. Clarity upon clarity.
The Prophet [SAW] said: "The extinction of the whole world is less significant before Allah than killing a Muslim man."
Reference: Sunan an-Nasa'i 3987 In-book reference: Book 37, Hadith 22 English translation: Vol. 5, Book 37, Hadith 3992
Grade: Hasan (Darussalam)
Yes how many Palestinians have been killed in Palestine as Egypt and Syria have blocked the borders as Munafiq Saud pay them to block the way?
@@malhamaulkubra4437 Keep your emotions to yourself and learn knowledge before you talk
Hadir menyimak kak
Thank you brother Shamsi (the lion) 🙂
Mashallah Brother
Erdugan is still a muslim leader. He has a lot of khayr in him. And turkish people love him. He talked about Islam in secularized Turkey Alhamdulillah. May Allah guide him more.
Jeddah is very 'modern'?
I love shamsi he refutes all the false beliefs using quran and sunnah always, I've seen many people on camera accept islam through him however whenever yemen is brought up I see a different side of him. He says Yemenis were killing sunnis but the sunnis that were dying were Yemenis too. Be specific don't group us all with the houthis. In many videos whenever someone brings up the yemen and saudi conflict he talks about yemen like we're the enemies of Islam. We love our religion alhamdulilah we love Allah, our beloved prophet his companions and wives too. He acts like the war is about religion when its clear a political conflict 1 major factor is bab al mandab. Like I said I love the brother but it hurts sometimes when he talks about Yemenis as if we're savages.
اتفق Yemenis aren’t houthis
May Allah forgive him and may Allah reward both of you with goodness.
Why Bro have Nots in his hair ?
الحمد لله
In this case , about Turkey , Pakistan....etc is only media 🤔
As he was saying that what is been said about Saudi is just media ,and we need to be careful .
Using the word is media whenever it suits 🙂
He call people, he knows people who live in these places
Want 10 lectures more. Don't want orthodox Kwarij lectures but try to relate it to real life today's events.
I have observed enemies of Islam are the only one who benefit from this doomer self destructive Kwariji mentality.
Look up "the nature of rule and rulership by Shaykh Abu iyaad"
It's on Shamsi's channel dus dawah
Lol mo deen in the background 35:00
The great scholar, Ibn al-Qayyim wrote, in explanation of the reality that the actions of the servants become manifest in those placed in authority over them, this being from the Divine wisdom:
And reflect in His, the Most High's wisdom in making the kings of the servants, their leaders and their rulers to be of the same species as the actions [of the servants]. Rather, it is as if their actions became manifest in the appearances of their rulers and kings.
If they remain upright, then their kings will remain upright, and if they turn away (from uprightness), then they (the kings) too will turn away from uprightness.
And if they (the servants) oppress [themselves and others], then their kings and rulers will oppress [them].
And if their appears plotting and deception from them, their rulers will [be made to] behave likewise, and if they (the servants) prevent the rights of Allaah that are between themselves and become miserly with respect to them (i.e. withhold the rights of each other), then their kings and their rulers will withhold the right that they (the servants) have upon them and will become miserly with respect to them.
And if they take from the one who is considered weak, what they do not deserve to take from him in their dealings (i.e. misappropriate from him), then the kings will take from them (the servants) what they do not deserve to take (from them) and will inflict them with taxes.
And everything that they (the servants) take away from the weak person, the kings will take away from them with power, force.
So their actions (those of the servants) become manifest in their actions (those of the kings and rulers). And it is not from the Divine wisdom that the evil-doers and the sinners are made to be ruled over [by anyone] except by one who is of their like.
And when the very first band (of Islaam) was the best of the generations, and the most pious of them, then their rulers were likewise. And when they became tarnished (i.e. corrupted), the Rulers were made corrupted over them. Thus, the wisdom of Allaah refuses that the likes of Mu'aawiyah, and 'Umar bin 'Abdil-'Azeez are put in authority over us in the likes of these times [the 8th Century Hijrah], let alone the likes of Abu Bakr and 'Umar. Rather, our rulers are in accordance with our (nature) and the rulers of those before us were in accordance with their (nature).
👍🏻
Deni
Saudi Arabs do foreign business, but that doesnt mean they are hypocrite..
So what if a leader who is regarded as a muslim (erdogan) openly praises democracy and is eager to stick to it even if europe and america abolishes it in their own countries, is he still regarded as a muslim? According to the Murjiah we have to consider his intention. But according to Qur'an and Sunnah, we have to judge by the zahir.
Empty paper cups
I donot defend the khawarij nor am I a khwarij . But yes i will tell you for sure that saudi is following the footsteps of American culture and now the latest thing that happened in saudi arabia on new year eve was astonishing. All the muslims from world look to saudi Arabia because we have the holy kabba and madinah there that's the reason it hurts when they go against the Allah and HIS beloved Prophet S a
Speaking out against a Muslim ruler can be seen as worse. Because the one who influences others with his speech will be accountable for influencing them to think the same and go further and act upon it.
There is no excuse. The quran and sunnah are clear. Here are just "some":
Imam Al-Nawawi’s Riyad-us-SaliheenChapter 80.
Obligation of Obedience to the Ruler in what is Lawful and Prohibition of Obeying them in what is Unlawful
Allah, the Exalted, says:“O you who believe! Obey Allah and obey the Messenger (Muhammad (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam)), and those of you (Muslims) who are in authority.” (4:59)
663. Ibn `Umar (May Allah be pleased with them) reported: The Prophet (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) said, “It is obligatory upon a Muslim to listen (to the ruler) and obey whether he likes it or not, except when he is ordered to do a sinful thing; in such case, there is no obligation to listen or to obey.”[Al-Bukhari and Muslim].
664. Ibn `Umar (May Allah be pleased with them) reported: Whenever we took a pledge of allegiance to Messenger of Allah (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) to hear and obey, he (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) would say to us, “As far as you are capable of.”[Al-Bukhari and Muslim].
665. Ibn `Umar (May Allah be pleased with them) reported: Messenger of Allah (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) said, “One who withdraws his hand from obedience (to the Amir) will find no argument (in his defense) when he stands before Allah on the Day of Resurrection; and one who dies without having sworn allegiance will die the death of one belonging to the Days of Ignorance.’‘[Muslim].Another narration is: The Messenger of Allah (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) said, “He who dies having defected from obedience (to the Amir) and discards his association with the main body of the (Muslim) community, dies the death of one belonging to the Days of Jahiliyyah.”
666. Anas (May Allah be pleased with him) reported: The Messenger of Allah (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) said, “Hear and obey even if an Abyssinian slave whose head is like a raisin is placed in authority over you.”[Al-Bukhari].
667. Abu Hurairah (May Allah be pleased with him) reported: The Messenger of Allah (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) said, “It is obligatory upon you to listen and obey the orders of the ruler in prosperity and adversity, whether you are willing or unwilling, or when someone is given undue preference to you.”[Muslim].
May Allah guide me and you
@@southernrealist5789 well we are being taught to speak against the amir if he is not acting according to quran and sunnah . Some of the companions of Prophet S. a W were talking about Umar R a about his being Amir over muslimeen one said what if umar did not rule according to Quran and Sunnah. I don't remember the name of the other companion he stood up and took out his sword and said by Allah if he did not go according to quran and sunnah our swords will make him go according to quran and sunnah . Upon hearing this Umar r a thanked Allah and said Glory belongs to Allah that he has made some people among us to straighten umar . Well we are at the urge of end times so these fitnas from such countries can be expected. Saudi is changing and they are going astray.
@@southernrealist5789 You are shameless. If you quote the quran, do it fully or don't do it:
"Then, if you quarrel about something, revert it back to Allah and the Messenger, if you believe in Allah and the Last Day. That is good, and the best at the end."
It's not just ; those of you who are in authority, you must obey.
It's MUSLIMS who are APPROVED by the MAJORITY of scholars. Not just any ruler. And what do we do if many say he is wrong? We go back to the prophet(pbuh) and Allah, meaning the sunnah and the quran. The authority of a ruler is null and void if he makes the ummah differs upon his rulings, or behaviour.
His legitimacy is another thing entirely, but onwards, a ruler has every possibility to be deposed by the learned amongst muslims if they see non-islamic actions from him or his rulings
@@Ersilay this response is for anyone reading the comments and not an attempt to convince someone that clearly looks for ways to meet his desires
Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamā’ah believe that rebellion against the rulers is forbidden
The consensus of Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamā’ah, Ahlul-Hadīth the Salafiyyūn from the early books of ‘aqeedah (creed) and manhaj (methodology) is that rebellion and uprising against the rulers of the Muslims is forbidden. The two Imāms, Abu Hātim Ar-Rāzi (d. 277H) and Abu Zur’ah Ar-Rāzi (d. 264H) among countless others recorded this ijmā’ (agreement of the scholars) in the famous work ‘Aqeedatur-Rāziyain:
“We hold that it is impermissible to rebel against the rulers…”
The Imāms, along with those who came before them (such as Bukhāri, Ahmad, Sufyān, Fudayl, etc) recorded this consensus once it was settled, based upon the clear cut evidence in the Book, authentic Sunnah and statements of the kibār among the Sahābah. And no one has opposed this position in the ‘aqeedah since that time until now except an ignoramus or a misguided innovator.
Rebellion (khurooj) is defined as attempting to snatch away authority from the ruler, opposing him publicly, attempting to force him out of office, inciting the people against him (through demonstrations, rallies, public protests, strikes, etc), plotting against him and rising up to challenge him with writings, sermonising or the sword.
All of this is considered as khurooj. The Prophet (ﷺ) prohibited it in clear and decisive narrations. Narrations that cannot possibly be opposed by desires, opinion and reason or by the erroneous judgements of men, regardless of their station the sight of the people. The Messenger (ﷺ) spoke from revelation and those after him did not. For this reason, when the ijmā’ (consensus) was settled upon, no one disagreed with it except the Khawārij, the Shi’ah, the Mu’tazilah and their offshoots until this time of ours.
Muslim reported in his Sahīh (1847) from Wā’il Ibn Hujr that: Salamah Ibn Yazeed Al-Ju’fee asked Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ): “O Prophet of Allah, what do we do if we have rulers over us who demand their rights yet they withhold our rights?” He replied: “Listen to them and obey them [regardless]. Upon them is their burden and on you will be your burden.”
Bukhāri (7054) and Muslim (1849) reported from Ibn ‘Abbās (may Allah be pleased with him) that the Prophet (ﷺ) said:
“Whoever sees from his leader something that he dislikes, then let him be patient with him because whosoever separates from the jamā’ah (i.e. the body of Muslims in a country) even by a handspan, and then dies in that condition, he will die the death of pre-Islamic ignorance (jāhiliyyah).”
Al-Hāfidh Ibn Hajr said in explanation of this hadeeth that Ibn Abī Jamrah Al-Andulūsi (d. 599H) said:
“The meaning of ‘separation’ is to attempt to break the covenant of allegiance that was attained for this leader - even if one splits away by the smallest degree. So, he gave the similitude of a handspan because even that amount will lead to the spilling of blood without due right.” (Al-Fath 13/7)
It is for this reason that the Imām of Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamā’ah, Ahmad Ibn Hanbal (d. 241H) stated in his work, Usūlus-Sunnah as is recorded in Sharhu Usūlil-I’tiqād of Al-Lālikā’ee (1/161):
“It is not permissible for anyone among the people to fight the ruler and nor to rise up against him. And whosoever does that is an innovator, upon other than the Sunnah and upon other than the Straight Path.”
Obedience to the ruler, whether he is righteous, pious, sinful or tyrannical is an obligation. Muslim reported in his Sahīh (1836) from Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) that the Prophet (ﷺ) said:
“You are obligated to listen to the ruler and obey him in times of ease and in times of hardship, whether you are pleased or displeased and even when another person is given preference over you (while you were more deserving).”
Muslim also reported (1059) from Anas Ibn Mālik (may Allah be pleased with him) that Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) stated:
“You will see after me severe preferential treatment (to those less deserving than you), so be patient until you meet Allah and you meet His Messenger at the drinking lake (Al-Hawd).” So they responded, “We shall be patient.”
In the wording reported by Al-Bukhāri (2377) Anas added: “But we (i.e. some of the Muslims) were not patient.” So this is proof that those who were not able to be patient, were mistaken in their judgement because the truth is what Allah’s Messenger commanded with.
Obedience to the ruler is obligatory in that which is not sinful, and rising up against him due to his sins or oppression is not permitted by ijmā’ (consensus) as recorded in the books of ‘aqeedah of the early Salaf as well as the authentic Sunnah.
And we should not be concerned with the emotional screams of the opposers of the Sunnah and the innovators such as Al-Ikhwān Al-Muslimoon, the followers of Hasan Al-Banna, Sayyid Qutb and Al-Mawdūdi and their modern-day offshoots from the political groups, parties and agitators, those who march for “social justice” and “removal of oppression” and incite the people against the rulers. All of that eventually leads to the spilling of innocent blood, the collapse of societies, the breakdown of law and order, the loss of Religion and Religious education for a generation or more! And Allah’s aid is sought against these political agitators, the destroyers of security and religion. They are as Imām Ahmad Ibn Hanbal (may Allah have mercy upon him) stated: “Whoever does that is an innovator, upon other than the Sunnah and upon other than the Straight Path.”
Ibn Abī ‘Āsim reported in As-Sunnah (1026) and Ibn Hibbān in his Sahīh (4062) from ‘Ubādah Ibn Sāmit (may Allah be pleased with him) that Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) said:
“Listen to the ruler and obey him when it is hard for you and when it is easy for you, whether you are pleased or displeased, and when others are given preference over you, and even when they consume your wealth and beat your back.” (Delared sahīh by Al-Albāni; see Dhilāl Al-Jannah and At-Ta’līqāt Al-Hisān).
This is what the Prophet of Allah (ﷺ) commanded the Sahābah with - that they were not to rebel or to rise up against the rulers even if others were given preference over them, and their wealth was taken away from them wrongfully, and they were beaten in their backs! So who has the right to say that they are not obligated by the command of the Messenger (ﷺ)?! Or that they are more worthy to stand up to social injustice and oppression than the Sahābah?! The Sahābah had to be patient and bear the tyranny, injustice and open sinful practices of the rulers, but 1,400 years later, these political activists, demonstrators, rebels and Ikhwānis cannot obey the Prophet?!
Shaikh Al-Islām Ibn Taymiyyah (may Allah’s mercy be upon him) said: “Being patient with the tyranny of the rulers is a fundamental principle (asl) from the fundamentals of Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamā’ah.” (Majmoo’ Al-Fatāwa 28/179) And this saying of Ibn Taymiyyah is in accordance and harmony with the ahādeeth of the Messenger (ﷺ).
Ibn Abī ‘Āsim reported in As-Sunnah (2/508) from ‘Adiyy Ibn Hātim (may Allah be pleased with him) that we said: “O Messenger of Allah, we do not ask you regarding obedience to the ruler who has taqwā (who is pious and who fears Allah), and is good and rectifies. Rather, we are asking about the ruler who does such-and-such and such-and-such?“ And he mentioned their evil traits. So the Prophet (ﷺ) answered: “Fear Allah! Listen to the ruler and obey him.” (Also reported by At-Tabarāni in Al-Kabīr, 17/101, and authenticated by Al-Albāni in Dhilāl Al-Jannah)
Al-Imām Ibn Taymiyyah (d. 728H) stated: “There have not been a people who revolted against their ruler except that their condition after their rebellion was worse than before they rebelled.” (Minhāj As-Sunnah 3/231) Is this not the constant reality of affairs even up until our times? Look at the uprisings and revolutions that have taken place across the Muslim world, between 2008 and 2019. What has been the condition of the people after these uprisings? Death, terror, upheaval and destruction! Yet the political activists and their so-called “liberal” allies call for more and more demonstrations, rallies and revolutions! The Muslims need to wake up and return the Sunnah of their Prophet (ﷺ)! The great Imām of the early Salaf, Yunus Ibn ‘Ubayd, stated: “It is amazing to see a person calling to the Sunnah in our time. And what is more amazing is the one who answers the call to the Sunnah.” (Abu Nu’aym in Hilyatul-Awliyā, 3/21, Ibn Battah in Al-Ibānah, no. 20 and Al-Lālikā’i, nos. 21-23)
Al-Hasan narrated saying: Allah’s Messenger mentioned the rulers and the evil rulers, the leaders and the evil leaders. He mentioned that the misguidance and deviation of some of them will fill what is between the sky and the earth! So he was asked: “O Messenger of Allah, should we not strike them with the sword??” He replied: “No. So long as they the pray the prayer, then no.” (Reported by Al-Imām Nu’aym Ibn Hammād (died 239H) in Kitāb Al-Fitan, 1/185, no. 491)
Let those who step forth and oppose these texts, narrations, methodology and belief receive tidings that they are from Ahlul-Bid’ah, opposers of the Sunnah, the Hadīth and Salaf.
@@southernrealist5789 It's not that I don't agree with those hadiths. Just that you're misusing them. I told you already what was required to be a ruler.
I'll make it simple for you with 2 questions:
Can a non-muslim be a leader for the muslims? Can the scholars make takfir of the leader if they bring forth proofs?
We all agree that as long as the leader is muslim, we must bear him even if he's bad at the post. But I'll ask you again a few other questions:
What is required of a ruler to be admitted as leading the muslims? At what point the actions of the ruler allows others to make takfeer of him?
You think the ruler as being untouchable no matter what but it's simply is not true. This remains the case as long as he remains a practicing muslim, the usual actions that leads to kufr makes him no longer able to be the leader and another must be chosen in his place.
Who from the selef explained that the one who sinned like shaving the beard, did not ruled by what Allah has revealed.
Who from the selef said that if you sinned, than you did not rule with that wich Allah has revealed.
exactly
So are you saying that leaving your beard is not part of the legislation that Allah revealed? If it is part of Allah's revelation, then certainly shaving the beard, is NOT ruling by what Allah has revealed.
@@abdullahbenhassan
The one who acknowlegde the hukm of Allah that it is haram but out of hawaa he still shaves knowing and acknoweleging that what he is doing is haram, did he ruled by what Allah has revealed?
@@foufoua the action he Committed of shaving the beard is NOT ruling by what Allah has revealed. But that does not necessarily make him a dhaalim, faasiq or a kafir. I dont know if i can be any clearer. He is not ruling by what Allah has revealed. But since he acknowledges it is sinful, he is no kafir at all. Wa allahu a3lam. And also i dont understand why you see this as a type of irjaa of brother shamsi
@@abdullahbenhassan your saying: "commiting the sin of shaving the beard is NOT ruling what Allah has revealed".
Bring me one of the selef who said this.
Bring one of the selef that said commiting a sin is NOT ruling with what Allah has revealed.
I say that anyone who acknowledges the rule of Allah, believing in it, he has ruled with that wich Allah has revealed.
What is khawariji? how do we know who is khawariji ?
People who make takfir on millions of Muslims, people who takfir over the slightest of things. Does a name come to your mind? This is what abdul wahab did, he takfired millions and millions of Ottomans and Ottoman leaders, even the ones before him, and these khawarij today are his followers
@@mariz.h8573 Where did I get what?
Khawarij don't exist anymore. There are groups 10 times worst than khawarij. When Muslims don't Luke or don't agree each other, they start calling each other khawarij.
Look up "the nature of rule and rulership by Shaykh Abu iyaad"
It's on Shamsi's channel
@@mohamedadan5120 The prophet SullAllahu alayhi wassalam clearly indicated that they would keep arising until the end times. So don’t talk rubbish
Where is the evidence in the 577 years from isa to mohammed of the original injeel given from allah to isa that is independent of the Christian scriptures?
1
No Allah is first
@@yasinahamad Al Awwal
Yeah but the point is there is a big difference between someone who is committing haram and he s trying to hide it and someone who is in charge and advertising and making rules for haram.
Are you telling me someone who shaves his beard is trying to hide it ?
@@tayloryoung4974 No, i am not talking about this particular sin.
But okay for example if someone shaves his beard he cant say to me:dont go to clubs or don't drink? may Allah forbid
And can i say to him heyy don't tell me what is right and what is wrong because you are a sinner?
@@Ibrahim-de1gj Yes, there's obviously a difference between a sinner who hides it and one "in charge and advertising" ( even though I've never seen anyone telling his subjects to "go and commit Haram").
But I get what you mean that he allows it. Is that a more severe Haram than someone just individually sinning (open or hidden) ?
Yes.
Does that make the one in charge automatically Kafir?
No.
@@Ibrahim-de1gj Brother we advice each other, all are imperfect.
However not by declaring a war against ur own war struck people
@@StudentOfKnowldge i am with you brother, i am against rebellion.
But at some point brother Shamsi may Allah bless him like he is saying that you cant even speak about the leaders.(this is what my first comment about)
Gaddafi is not kafr, he may be corrupt, but he is a Muslim, and also why did he lie? He did not say that the Green Book is like the Qur’an. Beware, there is a day of judgment. Do not make one of God’s servants your enemy on the Day of Judgment
Shamsi is very hypocritical on this. He calls Gaddafi a kaffir but when someone calls saudi leddars kuffar he becomes a khariji 😂😂😂🤦♂️
The follower of the Qur’an finds that most of the punishments of nations were due to the spread of evil and the abandonment of the prohibition of evil, then my sun comes with all its glory and makes the matter of evil that has become widespread in Saudi Arabia.
what about those military intervention which alliance did in afghanistan, iraq where there thousands of dead civillians isnt one muslim life same as life from those countries which invaded
Truly shameful how you keep deleting peoples comments. The example you give to non Muslims is embarrassing.
this man with the mask is ready for war
They where cerebrating Halloween! And that’s a pagan festival! So sha ahi is wrong
This guy doesn't know the law of Pakistan. In Pakistani law its mentioned that the ruler in the County is not the ruler in reality but Allah is the true ruler. And no law will be passed which is against quran and sunnah
Shamsi supports Saudi but when someone brings up their faults he says they're not Muhammad lol
He's preaching to the masses to live in piety, and ignore the leaders.
But leader's actions directly effect society as a whole.
He has given his evidences and they are sound. At this point if you have a problem with it you have a problem with Islam.
@@linkup901ify
Sure bro....you must also think Fauci is science lol
Shamsi is not Islam, he has good arguments, and I agree about implementing sharia on yourself before thinking of leaders.
But what if you do implement it on yourself?
What if you're not speaking from a place of hypocrisy? What if the actions of leaders and elites is causing the most harm in society?
Do you just become like the Christians and make Islam a "personal religion"
Who will implement sharia on the leaders and elites with private jets and super yachts while people starve?
@@DocRealTalk If you come from these places of sincerity, then you are of the good muslims and shall enter jannah insha'Allah. As he said, we can not rebel against the leaders, just like Syria did.
Shamsi also addressed this with hadith of 'Ali (ra) where someone came to him and said that the previous leaders such as 'Omar and Abu Bakr (ra) were better leaders. He said that is because from the people they were leading were people like me (Ali), Abu Bakr, Khalid and other sahaba. So even if that someone is as good as you say he is, then good for him. But atleast know that implementing shari'a especially with the west and enforcing laws in shari'a countries, it's not that easy ya akhi, without justifying our muslim leaders' actions. And if I'm being honest, even if that person you mentioned were to lead a muslim country, it will be hard on him aswell. Just like it was hard for 'Ali. Leading a country is no joke.
@@googleenjoyer1503 "We can not rebel against the leaders". That's a misconception, and a wide spread one. The leader must have some qualities to be in position in the first place. Being a muslim is one, being accepted is another, and then only on ruling matters, if he differs from the people but he checks the first 2 boxes we have to support it. So there are instances when the leader is effectively not one and can be removed from his position.
The fact that you think a leader has all powers over the ummah is telling, even Muhammad(pbuh) while he was the leader in every sense of the term, spiritual, warring or political, on most matters concerning the last 2 subjects he asked advices from his companions when no clear injunctions from Allah was given to him pertaining a matter. So nowadays when shamsi doesn't even dare to criticize the "leader", it shows that not only has he never learned about the prophet's own life, but that he's a coward because he's deserving of at least critiques, if not more.
@@googleenjoyer1503 najdi dawah 101 the Imams were fallible were the rightly guided generations?!
لو السعودية يحل المحرمات اليس هذا شرك؟
من الي حلل المحرمات ؟ محد حللها يخوي !
الجهل فضيع ، في شي اسمه تحليل عقدي و تحليل عملي الكفر يقع على من يحلل المحرمات عقدياً اما عملياً يعتبر كبيرة ولكن ليست مخرجة من المله
@@user-gz1yp2hu1f
او! لم أعرف ذلك!
الله يبارك فيك! 🌹
@@user-gz1yp2hu1f اجمع اجمع العلماء على حرمة المعازف لكن صاحبكم قال بأن حكم المعازف امر خلافي بين العلماء وهذا كذب واضح
لقد اصبحتم رقم 1 في اقامة الحفلات الغنائية لدرجة ان الغرب تعجبوا منكم
@@mohammedatta4209 خسئت يكذاب ونعم فيه خلاف في حكم الاغاني ( ابن حزم - الغزالي )عندما كنا متشددين مازلتم تكرهوننا وعندما تركنا التشدد مازلتم تكرهوننا ! اراهن و اتحداك ان تنطق ب اسم بلدك لانه مليئ بالشرك و البدع التي هي اعظم من الموسيقى !
Most of the time I don’t understand what shamsi is saying speak english mane
Meanwhile you make spelling mistakes lol
The song tunes/lyrics people sing too are clearly Shirki, the people who come to perform are mushriks
So a different form of shirk is being promoted and protected by the saudi government and the silence of government paid ulama clearly makes them Ulama e Soo
It's funny how shamsi finds justification for what saudi are doing and turns the debate into whats a bigger sin
Difference is saudi is promoting vice in the name of tourism and silencing the opposing voice whereas those countries where misguided sects are carrying out their rituals are not government sponsored nor promoted by the government, there's also an equal voice opposing these acts
Do people in saudi have the freedom to voice their concerns against the Haram being promoted by the government?
so why don't you say the same thing about Recep Tayip Erdoğan he is Muslim he allowed and encouraged hijap for Turkish women before him it was forbidden built thousand of mosques in Turkey and out side Turkey accepted more than 8 millions Syrian refugees as Ansar. you have to be fare brother Shamsi.
Like shamsi but he doesn’t have history knowledge of Arabs especially Middle East , and he doesn’t know much SH.Albani as well .
Madkhalisem is danger
You are a weapon in the hand of non Muslims to destroy Islam . Salafia is the Islam salafia isn't belong to any person. It is belong to book of Allah and sunnah and understanding of salaf
FBI and MOSSAD agents literally blew up candles after watching their propganda of "Madkhali" is working well and Muslims is standing against another Muslim.
You are a tool they use.
PS: Tawheed b4 Shairah
where is Allah?
Syed Qutb who was a Freemason and as you perhaps know Freemasons are Zionists in essence. so who are their agents is quite clear. earlier they used to select the rawafidh for their fitnah. now they have selected fine mules like muslim brotherhood and isis to carry out their fitnah
I hope you believe in polygamy shamsi ❤
Shamsi how many ppl did saud and wahab kill to establish the kingdom of Saudi Arabia
How many Mushrikee. did the Prophet SullAllahu alayhi wassalam and his companions RadiyAllahu’anhum kill to establish Islam?
What an evil irja from shamsi when he said that if a muslim prayes to someone else than Allah because he is ignorant, you cannot call him a kafir for this becaus he is jaahil.
So this means that shirk akbar out of ignorance can be monotheism.
لا حول ولا قوة إلا بالله
Bring your proof you liar, where did he say that?
@@tayloryoung4974 no problem, watch from 14:26 min up untill 15:08.
Shamsi says that the leaders of the ottomans were callers to shirk and when the guy asked if they were kafirs, shamsi says NO and this means that the ottoman leaders still were monotheists because a person is either a monotheist/muslim or a disbeliever.
And the reason why the ottomans still were monotheists according to shamsi is because they were ignorant. Shamsi said that a condition to be removed before takfeer is the person being ignorant i.e the person must have knowledge that the action is shirk.
I am using the term "monotheist" on purpose instead of "muslim" because every muslim is a monotheist but when you say that a muslim is praying to another besides Allah out of ignorance and you still call him a monotheist, then you will see how ridiculous this statement is.
Shamsi is correct, the proof must be established against them and they must understand it wa Allahu Alim
@@foufoua
Stop twisting his words you charlatan, he is speaking about establishing the proof on the individual, a muslim can fall into shirk akbar and as long as the PROOF isn't established against him he's still a Muslim, just like Muslim scholars don't make takfir on individuals from the rafida, if you think what shamsi said is irja then you must accuse all the scholars of islam who didn't make takfir on rafidi individuals of irja, shamsi clearly made his argument about not making takfir muayan on some ottoman rulers and if you think that's not valid then be prepared to accuse a lot Muslim scholars of irja.
It is form the traits of the takfiri khawarij to accuse ahlu sunnah of irja, and you're definitely a takfiri and I don't need to hear anything from you to know that.
"EvRrY mUsLiM iS a MoNoThEiT " there's no term such as "monotheist" in the sharia so stop using foreign terms ya jahil.
@@bilalsim124 really?
So when u know someone calls upon Allah and besides Allah the person asks the dead for paradise out of ignorance, he is still a muwahid, a monotheist?
Shamsi shrinks it down to Anjem Choudry and a person to start shariah on a personal level... Great deception :) to divert thinking of a person...
Shariah is about changing society as a whole...
He is promoting as if he is Tablighi Jamaat philosophy that you need to change yourselves and not to give Dawah to non Muslims...
Shamsi has been involved in many non Muslims giving shahada. More than anyone else in the park "put together" .....
@@southernrealist5789 True but the destruction of Hypocrite Rulers over the people of Islam is a separate issue altogether.
@@malhamaulkubra4437 So why are you here combining the issues and talking absolute rubbish?
saudi now not like saudi classic...saudi now come to liberal...saudi cannot be islamic century.,
saudi att his brother
you sound like khawarij
Have a listen to this lecture on Shamsi's channel
"the nature of rule and rulership by Shaykh Abu iyaad"
It will help you understand the difference between rulers and citizens
May Allah guide me and you
@@fixlab3047 say what you want... only Allah SWT know who is me...we Malaysian all from ahlu sunnah mazhab as Syafie...i just say what i see...see what happen to ulama in Saudi when he complained about concerts in Saudi
boto tu
@@kintakinto1663 sapa
I’m very sorry to say when it comes to Saudi Arabia Shamsi backs out on that countries wrong doings and justifies it by down playing issues that are presently going on in that country. Ya Saidi Brother Shamsi mentioned that Saudi opened a Night Club and people have an issue. It was not just a Nightclub. It was an international Dance Music Festival. With big Stars from the Music World like Cardi B, Justine Beiber and world renowned Dance Music DJ,s etc. Now also they did celebrate and allowed the kingdom to celebrate Halloween, record sales of Halloween Costumes. And very recently they have been Involved in allowing Meta Verse creator Zuckerberg (Facebook) to allow a form of Haj through Meta Verse and Sheikh Sudais has been seen or give the impression to a heads up. And no scholar would criticise that Government as they would be insulting the Royal Saudi Family (Homeboy Salman) (Mr Moderate Islam). If you are brothers are given questions on Saudi Arabia and you appear slimming away from that subject it is so visible. And there will be a time when you will have to answer, be it in this world or the next. Please be a group of integrity and answer properly, rather than throwing mist at the subject.
What's the difference between a night club and musical concerts? What's the difference if there are khaliji stars or international starts? It's the same sin in Islam ,and authorities are not forcing people to attend those events people go on their own. And no one also was forced to celebrate Halloween, people do it on their own, there's no public or official celebration of such an event ,people are just posting their personal celebrations on social media.
As for the second part what's wrong with doing hajj in the metaverse? It seems like you just want to be angry at anyone or anything that comes in your way.
Saudi is not perfect, however when it comes to Islamic priorities it is doing good because there are a lot of scholars and students of knowledge and there are a lot of Islamic universities and schools that gives Islamic training more than any country in the world, Islamic teachings are included in the curriculum since first grade...
And no scholars don't criticize rulers because it's the way of ahlu sunnah, they instead make dua for their guidance and advice them privately, whether they accept advice not that's on them just like your kids might not accept your advice.
@@tayloryoung4974 I agree on many areas and your point of view is liberal. However TY they should should be setting an example as they are funding many Islamic Institutions around the world and as we know they have exported their brand of Aqueedah on many countries and even forced their school of thought in many a vulnerable Land. This criticism of them is vital. Now as Shamsi said you can criticise people or nations when it concerns the greater good. Also scholars of more of a high calibre than Shamsi know this but as you know they don’t want that knock on the door or their funding being stopped. Nobody is perfect and we all need to strive for that but that country is not getting any criticism just like Zionists do not criticise Israel.
@@salimchandia2110
No, criticizing Muslim leaders is from the aqeeda of ahlu sunnah, people of sunnah dont criticize Muslim leaders publicly because its part of their aqeeda not because saudi is funding them, if you think otherwise you need to bring proof or you'll be known as a slanderer.
@@tayloryoung4974 That’s the best way to cop out from an argument. Using Fiqh to justify what is going. I can get you proof but I am more concerned when you criticise other Muslim countries but not Saudi.. Double Standards. Remember when a country who holds keys to the Holy Sites and you cannot have the decency to observe to state that wrong is being taken place. And in the long run it will effect Saudi Arabia and the wider Muslim World. That is going against the Muslim Aqueedah, Islam and the teachings of the best of all creation MSAW. Come in brother stop being sterile. And think openly like the. Scholars of the who the leaders took advice. Not the ones who were forced to stay quiet and let the leaders oppress their people with Haram Festivals and pagan Traditions.
@@salimchandia2110
You can get no proof, and no we didn't criticize any Muslim country we are consistent with what we believe alhamdulilah.
As for anything that happens in saudi Arabia it really is none of your concern, there're a lot of scholars and students of knowledge who advice the people and teach them the religion daily and command good and forbid evil and advice the rulers, saudi is not in need of you or anyone else they have their own men.
Sunnism is a separate religion and has nothing to do with Al Islam
So what’s Shiism then ?
@@ahmedhaydari8605 Shi'ism has nothing to do with Islam either all these are cults (sunni,shia,sufi.salafi wahabai)
Why do you think this??