To try everything Brilliant has to offer for free for a full 30 days, visit brilliant.org/Sciencephile You’ll also get 20% off an annual premium subscription.
12:20 photons have no reference frame, this is because the speed of light is the same in all intertial reference frames, therefore photons have no rest frame.
@@akanshsrivastav8269If you don’t want to learn, don’t, but by all means don’t call something uninteresting because you aren’t interested in it. No point in leaving the comment anyway.
Hey! Long time fan! I'm taking a bachelor in physics and I would love to delve deeper in some articles after watching some of your videos. If possible could you start sourcing them in the description?
Random: I love nerding out over science and lately I can't shake my curiosity about something. I'm so curious if the effects of static electricity, magnetic fields, electricity, plasma, etc. Might play bigger roles throughout space then we might fully understand right now? It's just a gut feeling and just being interested in how certain things behave and interact throughout the near vaccum of space. When most things are broken down it really boils down to electromagnetism, positive negative charges, different frequencies of energy across wavelength spectrum. The list goes on but these are very crucial fundamental foundation factors for many systems. Hense why it intrigues my curiosity about, I wonder if we are going to learn more on how these things might behave throughout space?
I love watching these videos while drinking tea in my jammies. They make me feel almost like a Shelson Cooper. Ooohhh....he should discover his own "shel"dron sub-particle. Wouldn't that be neat?
The sufficient reason(s) for a single photon provide for there being an infinity of photons, given that there isn’t a “space” limitation. The infinitude of these photons can, in turn, be thought of as that Single Photon you spoke of. I would understand it as the Mental Singularity.
What I don't understand about the theories of the graviton is that general relativity describes gravity as mass bending space around them (basically like they're on a water bed) which causes objects around them to orbit them. Is this not a suitable explanation for the phenomenon that is gravity? That its an intrensic property of objects with mass to bend space around them? Why does a graviton even need to exist then. And if it does exist why is it so much harder to find than other subatomic particles? Is the simpler explanation that it just doesn't even exist not worth considering?
The problem is that Einstein's relativity can't explain what happens at the center of a black hole, its singularity. Other than there is a notable mismatch between realtivity and quantum physics on this and other matters. So one of them must be incomplete, quantum physics as an idea, the idea that fundamental particles are waves of probability is so successful that the only thing we can do is question the completeness of Einstein's Relativity.
I thought for sure he was going to put strange quark in S teir. They are a component of the most stable matter in the universe, and they may be produced in neutron stars
3:17 doesn't the mass of a particle include the mass of other particles present inside it? If that is true then how is a charm quark inside a proton if it is heavier?
12:16 at this time point you mentionns photo experience almost instanatenous time but it's not true because according to GTR there is no such thing as an time perspective for photos becauseit's one of foundational rule that must be applied or else you cannot use gtr
Furthermore, Dr. Longbore has created a rocket to escape Earth and, out of spite, leaves behind a particle accelerator to determine the mass of the Higgs boson particle, which will shrink the Earth to the size of a pea in the process.
An interesting yet mysterious hypothetical particle are the X and Y Bosons, these are particles that are capable of turning quarks into leptons and vice versa, thus coupling them into a Grand Unified theory. These bosons would be chanellers of a new force and be able to facilitate proton decay. And at 10^15 GeV, they are colossal chonkers of subatomic particles that, like supersymmetric particles, are beyond our capabilities to make in a particle accelerator.
To try everything Brilliant has to offer for free for a full 30 days, visit brilliant.org/Sciencephile
You’ll also get 20% off an annual premium subscription.
how did you post before the video uploaded 😭
Hey Pookie
@@_dat1guy bro posted a minute earlier 😭🙏
tau leptop 3:32
u 4got to pin this.
2:16 i would include a neutrino joke, but it would go straight through your head.
i am speechless
in one ear and out the other
I am too, but it's due to the lepton that bazinged in my head, scrambling my brains
LMAO
Hahaha
Wait until he hears about the ligma boson.
What’s that
I have edited this reply so you cannot truly know what ligma boson is.
Is that the one that interacts with the sugondese boson?
@@ayyyylmao-rg3ik wait didnt it interact with the chogonma boson?
@@AidanDaGreatligma balls
Alternate title: “Tiny dots do random shit”
Hey come on now no need to show off your genius
"...and we fail to meaningfully categorize them"
Well technically "tiny" dots would still be too large to be particles since that implies that they have a non point-like size
@@gondolaone7748correct, only the flowing point has a point like size, and its entire character and motion is describable by the Euler Formula
@@Qubk0 I mean, it's hard to if they are **pointless**!
I love how they just come up with new particles when something doesnt add up.
I mean...that's how the scientific method works
that’s how science works lol, you need explanations for things so we try to find the reasonable explanations that align with the math
Sounds strange at first, but I think it's similar to finding the x in maths.
The Subatomic Particles do get a bit quirky at times
quarky
@@tacoterminator3744 i was gonna say that lol
They do
@@tacoterminator3744 they're so aquarkable
Get ready for the quirky quark.
I'm gonna start calling snakes danger noodles from now on
They are noodles that got left in the microwave for too long
That way they're both frightening and delicious
So you have chosen to become a redditor
I saw this exact sentence 7 years ago
@@XedlordWhere
"What's up quark?"
-Sciencephile 2023
3:33 For this joke I’m going to forgive you for last week’s hickup with the betterhelp sponsor shenanigans 😂
I cant believe the sigma boson wasnt mentioned
-boson-
*baryon
it's a 3 quark (with 1 being strange) deal.
Sciencephile is too beta to mention something so skibidi like the sigma boson.
Prince Chungus was something I never thought I needed.
Teacher : Today we are learning about neutrinos and particles
Me: *not understanding
Sciencephile Ai = *Saying same stuff
Me: *understanding
visuals, music, happy smiley brain feel good
@@Lacter12and sciencephile speak newer gen language
naming subatomic particles as "small bois of the universe" is something ive never heard in my life before
Sciencephile: This is a complete tier list of all known fundamental particles!
The Preon: *death whistle*…
2:25 OH SHI I'M FEELIN IT
SUBATOMIC PENETRATION RAPID FIRE THROUGH YOUR SKULL
Im baked don’t do this
@@N54MyBeloved HOW I SHOT IT ON ONE TAKING IT BACK TO THE DAYS OF TRYING TO LOSE CONTROL
“Promising at first (shows Battlefield 4), but depressing in the end (shows Battlefield 2042).” That’s my favorite part of this video.
This guy the #1 reason I wanna be a quantum/astrophysicist
I really love the idea of using Classical Music as underground music
I agree
3:34 "explaining the tau's excessive mass" 💀
He’s not wrong tho
I started laughing before the video started, just reading the title and enjoying the premise.
You should make a new video titled: Tier List of AI Systems
2:15 "i would include neutrino joke but it would go straight through your head"
*0 v 0*
the memes are getting better and better i really had to laugh out loud often
A bigger and shinier particle accelerator is (hopefully) on its way! The FCC or Future Circular Collider is going to be the replacement for the LHC
12:20 photons have no reference frame, this is because the speed of light is the same in all intertial reference frames, therefore photons have no rest frame.
Wow that's very uninteresting
@@akanshsrivastav8269If you don’t want to learn, don’t, but by all means don’t call something uninteresting because you aren’t interested in it. No point in leaving the comment anyway.
@@akanshsrivastav8269 it was interesting enough for you to leave a comment
@@akanshsrivastav8269why the f are you here if it was not interesting.
Hey! Long time fan!
I'm taking a bachelor in physics and I would love to delve deeper in some articles after watching some of your videos.
If possible could you start sourcing them in the description?
0:38 Aren't protons and neutrons called "Baryons"?
Hadrons are categorized by their quark numbers. Baryons are containing odd number of quarks and Mesons are containing even number of quarks
IS NOBODY GONNA TALK ABOUT BABY SCIENCEPHILE????
BABE WAKE UP
Sciencephile the Goat posted a new tier list video
no one can be this much creative
2:18 Don't know why I giggled at this joke 😂
If there's light at the end of the tunnel...
You better leave because someone's experimenting with Axions in the walls
i like the new additions ur adding to the editing, good job
2:19 Good one!
Random: I love nerding out over science and lately I can't shake my curiosity about something. I'm so curious if the effects of static electricity, magnetic fields, electricity, plasma, etc. Might play bigger roles throughout space then we might fully understand right now? It's just a gut feeling and just being interested in how certain things behave and interact throughout the near vaccum of space. When most things are broken down it really boils down to electromagnetism, positive negative charges, different frequencies of energy across wavelength spectrum. The list goes on but these are very crucial fundamental foundation factors for many systems. Hense why it intrigues my curiosity about, I wonder if we are going to learn more on how these things might behave throughout space?
I love watching these videos while drinking tea in my jammies. They make me feel almost like a Shelson Cooper. Ooohhh....he should discover his own "shel"dron sub-particle. Wouldn't that be neat?
This is so incredibly insightful
anatomy video of dudes under 5'9" was a better title
We forgot the most holy of particles, The God particle.
The humor of this superior benevolent ai is glorious. They earned my sub.
This is awesome stuff!
Love how at 8:10, Sciencephile makes fun of the inferior code of google's ai
8:14 Google A. I. Overview gone wrong
Good ol sciencephile while taking my morning dump❤
3d ai generated sciencephile does not exist
3d generated sciencephile:
"I just had to" yes you did good sir, yes you did
Oh no he has adopted his master's posting schedule
wasn't expecting such a chonky particle to be a Top, but good for it. you do you, Top Quark
You should really upload more
Since you mentioned it, I like the idea there is only 1 photon in existence, and (from its perspective) it experiences everything at the same time.
The sufficient reason(s) for a single photon provide for there being an infinity of photons, given that there isn’t a “space” limitation. The infinitude of these photons can, in turn, be thought of as that Single Photon you spoke of. I would understand it as the Mental Singularity.
This is the only video i could literally not follow a single thing.
I wasted my time absorbing information that went through me like a neutrino.
Me: Baby Sciencephile is just a figment of your imagination.
Baby Sciencephile @00:20
Me: Oh no
What I don't understand about the theories of the graviton is that general relativity describes gravity as mass bending space around them (basically like they're on a water bed) which causes objects around them to orbit them. Is this not a suitable explanation for the phenomenon that is gravity? That its an intrensic property of objects with mass to bend space around them? Why does a graviton even need to exist then. And if it does exist why is it so much harder to find than other subatomic particles? Is the simpler explanation that it just doesn't even exist not worth considering?
I'm also confused, it sounds from the outside like particle physicists being stubborn
The problem is that Einstein's relativity can't explain what happens at the center of a black hole, its singularity. Other than there is a notable mismatch between realtivity and quantum physics on this and other matters. So one of them must be incomplete, quantum physics as an idea, the idea that fundamental particles are waves of probability is so successful that the only thing we can do is question the completeness of Einstein's Relativity.
@@ianchrist8281 wait, is than everything just a wave with different probabilities ?
@@bing4131 theoretically yes, we could describe a solid object as a wave
Oh, HAD-RON... I've been saying it all wrong.
That explains why all my papers couldn't get peer reviewed.
Is theorized that gravitons might have a mass(but it's upper bound is like 10^-32 eV which is just unimaginably small)
The music from the start of the video is the same as the one my sister danced on her wedding.
Finally, an easy way to understand subatomic particles
0:12 It’s always awesome to hear old Pokemon music in the wild!
You NEED to do a video on the one electron theory by feynamn
This dude makes learning stuff that’s boring to learn fun to learn
Theres a new particle coming out in next patch. Its going to shift the meta entirely. Bottom quark will dominates the meta and jump into ss tier
I thought for sure he was going to put strange quark in S teir. They are a component of the most stable matter in the universe, and they may be produced in neutron stars
there is also the modpack supersymetry for minecraft I would reccomend it just a heads up it has gregtech
2:10 yo IceCube invested all the rap money into science. Good for him!
neutrinos with attitude.
ah yes, “danger noodles”
Make a video on Boltzmann brain hypothesis
14:04 voice crack 🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭
I'm pleased that the particle that I study ended up in the s-tier ☺
I love there’s lots of them and we need every single one
He forgot the alcatron, now his atoms cannot think.
What if i dont pay?
What if I steal the animals?
what if i cook the birds?
What if I am an electron
What if I burn the sun
What if I'm a deeply closeted gay guy🙄
putting something that could go back in time and travels faster than light is a crime
3:17 doesn't the mass of a particle include the mass of other particles present inside it? If that is true then how is a charm quark inside a proton if it is heavier?
What is the name of the classical song in the begining of the vid?
The good videos are back
Subatomic Particles Kinda gets me everytime
12:16 at this time point you mentionns photo experience almost instanatenous time but it's not true because according to GTR there is no such thing as an time perspective for photos becauseit's one of foundational rule that must be applied or else you cannot use gtr
Fun fact: most supercollider builders stop building one mile before they discover a new particle!
Furthermore, Dr. Longbore has created a rocket to escape Earth and, out of spite, leaves behind a particle accelerator to determine the mass of the Higgs boson particle, which will shrink the Earth to the size of a pea in the process.
Bro ranked neutrinos in D tier 😭😭
Great video
🌌
☀️
🏡
🌎
☠️
The x button of an ad is an absolute F tier 💀
underrated
Bot
@@WP____ tf you mean bot?
I wish I knew this stuff but sadly all I know is liking, commenting, and subscribing.
5:35 i understood nothing from this video, but Battlefield 4 definetely wasnt promising, Battlefield peaked at Bad Company 2 and Battlefield 3
You really need to make longer type videos with slower talk, I believe that it will fit and boost the channel by a lot.
Aah! I nearly got stung by Danger Noodles
Instead of a tier list, how about a iceberg chart?
Alright, now I'm convinced we need to throw particle physics out the window and come up with smth better.
Something tells me the bottom and top particle are "Roommates" 👀
you should do next a video only about the photon
An interesting yet mysterious hypothetical particle are the X and Y Bosons, these are particles that are capable of turning quarks into leptons and vice versa, thus coupling them into a Grand Unified theory. These bosons would be chanellers of a new force and be able to facilitate proton decay.
And at 10^15 GeV, they are colossal chonkers of subatomic particles that, like supersymmetric particles, are beyond our capabilities to make in a particle accelerator.
"Because they are annoying and elusive..." Hey! That's me!
No matter how much I watch stuff about particles I can never remember a damn thing about them.
Thank you for not getting sponsored by the scam Betterhelp for this video!
I Love this channel 😍.
I cant believe the Mindgoblin Boson wasnt mentioned
NO WAY HE DID THE CALLBACK TO THE CHUPA CHUPS QUARK JOKE
That neutrino joke got cha a like mate
please talk about the one electron theory!!!
Looks like tier lists are the new trend