Starfield Open World is Still Terrible in 2024?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 дек 2024
- Has the Starfield Open World improved in 2024? This may SURPRISE you! After so many negative reviews Bethesda's Starfield, have any improvements been made to the lackluster open world? #starfield #gaming
Comment below what you would change in Starfield!
Credit to the channels below for some of the useful Starfield footage:
@knightmaster8511
@ZelexFPS
@Prizzaa
Join us and don't miss an upload by subscribing to my channel here: www.youtube.co...
For sponsorship's, brand deals and other business enquiries feel free to contact me on my business email here: L321Sponsors@gmail.com
★ Social Media ★
Facebook Page: / l321gaming
My Twitter. / l321mods
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What would you change in Starfield?
Framerate, multiplayer
yeah 30fps on console really sucks @@theleasys5
I'd make it fallout 5 or elder scrolls 6
hate love lol i no more play it. I was reading today it has now AMD FSR 3 since few dayys ago. I had enough fps so I do not care with my 4090. I am very disapointed now. Needs fixes and content updates. It feels to empty for me.
Seamless planets, a la No Man's Sky.
Better writers. Let Obsidian do all the writing. Easily some of the worst sci-fi worldbuilding in a game, nevermind what it doesn't come close to touching in sci-fi literature.
I truly expected that Bethesda game studios would look at the mods that were made for Skyrim and learn some things from them about what the players would like in Starfield. I was really really disappointed in this regard, since it's obvious that they not only don't care about what people want, but they're even cutting down the content down to the bare minimum in favor of procedural generation done poorly as well. Sad to see.
Big shame!
Starfield is the game that made me realize Bethesda makes a template for modders to add into. They are not actually innovative themselves.
Its like instead of seeing the mods as feedback for what fans wanted, they saw them as free labor and the selling point of the game.
Starfield feels like it was made to be a massive platform for space themed mods instead of as an actual game and then had the story and quests added on last minute.
Cyberpunk > Starfield
👀
how long did cyberpunk take until it became good 🤔
@@Nick-xf5gihonestly probably 2 years. So to be fair let’s see how Starfield gets fixed. That’s why I’m waiting a couple years before I touch this.
Cyberpunk could be fixed and it did. Its problem was not of a bad design, but rather rushed development to meet the set release date by execs. This left many mechanisms of it half-baked and thus the bugs and problems we faced.
As soon the dev team took another 2 years to work on it they delivered the masterpiece we all hoped for.
Starfield on the other hand suffers from something much deeper. Bad, bad, bad design in all of its subsystems. Only a total rewrite could potentially “fix” Starfield. So, don’t expect a Cyberpunk-like comeback. It’s a lost cause at this point. Sadly…
@@foteinimantzali8691 CP2077 is a great game now but it came out completely broken with a lot of missing things. The game had one good thing, the story, that's it.
Many things where just not even their to begin with, even without all the bugs and glitches on release it would have been a bad game.
The amount of work done on animation, AI, wanted system, physics, guns, skill tree, car combat and more is what makes it a good game.
Starfield just needs to hide it's loading screen better, improve combat AI and patch some quests with alternative options.
Skyrim had people reacting to your weapons/magic being out
the fact that a 2024 game by the same people doens't is sad
They should have started on making this a "living on your ship with your growing crew" game with most of your time spent inside your ship and actually doing stuff in /space/. Sure you could throw in some planets here and there but it shouldn't have been the main focus.
The core problem is BGS wanted Starfield to be more RPG than space sim, but they don't have the writing talent to sustain a good RPG
In my opinion it’s not their engine’s fault, as we can see modders can makes their game truly beautiful, from graphics texture, animation even physics in an old engine that Skyrim use. It’s them to blame for this outdated game, their laziness and less creativity. They already working under Microsoft, I believe there’s no lack in financial and human resources, it’s just pure lazy and lack of creativity
I was playing ghost recon wildlands the other day. The NPCs ran when i put out my gun, get off the car or just screams. The furniture, the lights, all react. Amazing open world...
bro.. if you play ghost recon breakpoint im sure you will disappointed
Wildlands is a surprisingly good game.
What would be a nice game (I think). Big open world (appr. 1 galaxy, 50 star systems, each has 2-15 planets). 2 of these planets are ideally designed with different cities on them (those like in Cyberpunk), others - generated (jusr empty surface like in real life). Have many missions and the main story line of course too. One planet would be a home planet with usual towns including old arhitecture and another would be a colonised planet where everyhthing is futuristic. The world is continuous, so you can reach any part of it using continuous flight. Between these 2 planets would be a wormhole that helps you to reach them faster but you still can reach them on your own (it will take nearly 3 minutes using maximum startship speed). Also starships would use gravital engines, not fuel like in starfield for example. There would be bad gangs that you have to deal with, space fights too. Underwater bases. Near-solar vast station that will transform sun energy to planets and near-planet stations would take it and re-send to on-planet stations that will produce electricity. Those second colonised planet would be in a double-star system and would have giant moon with dust rings (so you'd see 2 stars and giant blue moon on the horizon). PLanets would have different gravity so if you land on a big planet your starship can get broken because it would crash. It would be a beautiful space landscape (spacescape?) of galaxy with different colors when being in an open space not like black background in starfield. Realistic physics
There are so many good games on the market that I neither have the time or the inclination to go back to Starfield. So much of the game needs overhauling that I doubt any amount of updates will give people what they were promised. I had enough fun with it but it's time for me to move on.
I agree with everything you said. I don't see them fixing this. Even if they do, it will likely be too late.. such a shame
For the menus thing, I wish they'd do something like The Division. They have this little circular light on their wrist/backpack that brings up an in-world display with all the buttons and menus you need. Not to mention they are organized neatly and concisely.
Welp, I simply cannot wait to see what kind of a disappointing clusterfuck Elder Scrolls 6 will be.
I held off on Cyberpunk for over a year and finally started playing and its amazing, especially after the 2.0 patch. No mans sky really redeemed itself, and i love that game now. Starfield has hope that Bethesda will redeem it, but i dont know if they actually will, because they know the big cash cow is coming next, the next TES game. I hope to play a revamped Starfield one day, if Bethesda cares enough about it....
Game devs can't keep getting away with games that are worse every year when 10 years ago they had polished products for half the budget
Exactly man. Utter joke. RIP those who spent 70$ pre-ordering this game
@@L321we can $100 for starfield you pony simp
1:00 1:12 That was so funny i couldn’t stop laughing lol 😂
Same bro, srs crying right now
@@GeorgeLJ1990 haha 😂
I completely agreed with the video, as much as I like Starfield, sadly the con out-weights the pros. Hopefully Bethesda pull up a "2.0" version overhaul and we get a better overall game. (Sadly it's not gonna happen).....
I dipped when you dissed the mighty Freddo. For shame!
Bethesda is not gonna do anything for this game. Bethesda has been awful for a decade now. I didn't even like skyrim. The creation engine needs to be scrapped but they won't do that
Red dead 2 is the GOAT
1:12 made me cry with laughter 😂
They should’ve just stuck to outer worlds formula if they are gonna have loading screens.
Yeah, Bethesda gonna stop caring about this game three months after the expansion gets released. The real developers (modders) will take over and fix the game with mods.
Since when did Bethesda give up on any game? Fallout 76 was a disaster and they didn't give up on it. Starfield didn't launch as bad as 76.
The saddest part is that due to a lack of fundamental content, all efforts that should have been dedicated to creating a AAA story dlc with tons of new content is instead dedicated to trying to force into a broken system a fraction of the content that is lacking.
Strongly agree.
They don't really need to do anything because they know modders are going to just fix the whole thing for them lol
My biggest gripe is them adding NOTHING new to this game, like they did with all their other games, except display settings. That is not new content.
I can forgive everything except the lack of content. it feels empty. In skyrim, every dungeon had some sort of backstory, maybe a quest related to it and possibly a cool unique item at the end of it. the dungeons were about 20-30 minutes long each. once you move from the main story or 4 faction story lines then starfield becomes very empty. give me more quests like the lair of the mantis or the one with the parralell universes. every star system has needs a quest of this quality.
Skyrim dungeons were all samey but at least they were hand crafted. Starfield just looks so boring
My first Bethesda game and my last
SF is barebones at best - content content and much more content is needed
indeed!
I like starfield better then cyberpunk right now tbh and starfield even runs better performance wise. I don’t run around every planet for no reason, I scout them for outposts, survey them etc. whenever people mention the barriers which take extremely long to reach, I already know they are playing the game in bad faith.
thanx for your response Todd Howard… Glad you are enjoying your own game...
@eyoutuber1058 You dont play games , you just watch other peoples opinions on them. Who cares what you think about anything.
@@troyknights3342 lol …Starfailed is trash…
How much are they paying you ?
@@troyknights3342
You're free to enjoy slop, little piggy.
That doesn't remove it from critique.
That's what made fallout 4 great, roaming around and discovering cool things. Starfield doesn't seem to have that, walking for miles on planets is the most monotonous for me.
Stealth finishers are badly needed too!
That would be cool
Glad I got this game for free and WILL play it when it's improved. Whenever that is...
Can you comparing starfield with kingdom come deliverance? It would be fun😊
Will check that out man
KCD>Starfield
I can't stand building in an open world game. I'd rather explore and find quests. I enjoyed the game to begin with, but then it had no appeal to carry on playing it. The story is extremely short and building on planets/moons and ship building is really not my thing (this was one of the reasons that pushed me away from the game). I really do hope they can inject new life into this as the visuals are superb.
The main reason for me to why I just cant play it is the poor framerates on the series x.
Yeah 30fps is hard for me to play nowadays
"One of the few people out there who enjoyed it at the start, but grew to dislike it over time."
uhhh.... that's not a few people. That's most people.
Us "few" people knew it was trash from the beginning.
When Todd compared it to red dead redemption I knew it was over
Starfield has an average player base of 5,663 on Steam in the last 30 days. 💀
I thought no one would address the dumb NPC problem...
The Starborn NPC walked through the wall and left the building. Now I'm trapped in a building with no exit. I'm supposed to kill the NPC in order to exit the building. I'm level 50 ng+ ...
My 2 previous save point have gone corrupt. Next available save point is level 40 😠 🤦🏻♂️... Called bathesda, they said thanks for call'n, what do you want from us 🤷🏻♂️ 😆 ...
Here is my idea on how to improve Starfield: Finally put Bethesda out of its corporate misery.
games like that exist cos people like you be buying them and giving ur money to ape companies
you have star citizen and many other different A or AA games that are 10-100x better than AAA games
give those attention that deserve it, who actually deliver, not just out of money but because they want to achieve a goal, AAA games almost never do.
great video! so annoyed at myself for pre-ordering this scam of a game, can't even return it.
thanks man and yeah, that sucks!
They could’ve hid the loading screens like how Jedi Survivor did with the Cantina
Have you checked Homeworld 3 out?
Bethesda releasing starfield is like sending an unarmed civilian to war
that's one way of putting it
I have the game. unfortunately I waited too long so I can’t get refund it. I went into it very open minded and was prepared to deal with the usual Bethesda bugs for a good story but I had to realise it is 2024 and I can’t ignore problems what I could had have 10-15 years ago. Plus the story is just silly many points and forced. For me this game is pure rubbish. I still hope that they will fix most of the things but I am afraid it won’t be happening any time soon…
1:44 Lmfao
its not an open world game. your point with the ship and the local area loaded is one thing, but space is a medium for traveling to other areas. its a lot how Fable 3 handled travel, and it's fucking awful.
Couldn't agree more! Open world truly sucks still.
What game do you play that has NPC so active ?
RDR2
Gta5
The npc's act like GTA SAMP bots from a random troll server 💀😂
It’s what they are, well sorta…. The code behind them is made in the moment. It saves on game space. They actually had AI make a lot of assets for this game. If you look at where they put most of their vertices, it was in the food. This game could totally run on older systems. But they didn’t want it to. They wanted to sell Xbox’s. It’s about money, not fun
The game is horrible from top to bottom. The best thing Bethesda can do is scrap the dlc and focus on Elder Scrolls
Perfect right!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I buy full game and unistal after I was so disapointed
Legend!
this review was really funny
I could never play this game without mods. Period.
Mods really improve it!
Most people don't play Bethesda games without mods. Dont know why people try to act like Starfield is different. Creation kit on the way. People swear. Relax. Nobody plays Skyrim FO4 just for the story.
@@SistaCitizen Starfield is my second Bethesda game. First was Skyrim. Never played any of the Fallout games.
@@LunarKills 😂
I don’t care about the bugs. The game is way too shitty and empty for the hype and cost
It's the best game ever! It's literally AAAAA! Nobody has ever seen so many As!
And it will become even more masterpiecer than it already is by fixing YET ANOTHER cosmetic bug!
Have you ever seen a developer who is awesome enough to fix several cosmetic bugs within half a year?! NOBODY HAS EVER DONE THAT!!
i am first in a channel i have never seen before
That’s cool
It's Bethesda 25 years in the making so......
As a fallout fan a big one at that I’m not a very big fan of elder scrolls but respect it for sure. So starfield I had game pass so I said fuck it downloaded it on my pc and I was enjoying for about a week then I put it down the world was half ass not fun nothing there the planets were just boring absolutely nothing there the ship creation was confusing as fuck . Fallout 4 over starfield any day of the week and especially fallout new Vegas and 3 over starfield any day of the week. In fo4 your can travel and get something new at each location not in starfield the characters in starfield were just not there and didn’t connect with them like in the fallout games.
Sounds like a failure, A game not worth investing time into
tried my first ng+ an i was like nahhh im good whats the point smh
keep in mind, the next elderscrolls game is going to be just as bad as this. if bathesda's history is anything to go for, may as well not get excited for that. this shitty company is going to flop on that too.
Is it playable in 2024? Guess not
I think the open world is great, still would love to see more going
linear games are better because of this kind of quantity over quality.
And they told us not to conpare it to cp77, this game looks even more bastardised 😂 (btw props to cp77 it's amazing now it has all i've wanted)
Damn so you want a 5 exabyte download filled with non-empty planets???
0:35 KSI 😂
Give if a few dlc’s then Look again. Most big open world games are 💩 u til they have 6-12 months of dlcs. No man sky is just getting close after what 7-8 years?
will do! lets hope it improves
I don't at all think NPCs looked better on Xbox 360 lol... also didn't they recently update them? >_> now the NPC AI yes it's terrible lol
Never was terrible.
Maan, its been 7 months the game has been out, still has a player base of 6.5 million active players, no matter how long yall keep hating on it, it aint going nowhere bruh.
Where did you get this info💀
Funny how, every time I've commented the site, it's on, my comments are taken down, it's almost like y'all wanna live in that bubble of lies 😂. A tip, don't just check Steam numbers as they are often wrong, and mainly cause this ISN'T a steam game, check it's gamepass players, Xbox players, Xbox app for pc, those are its main platforms. How ignorant would it be if I only took bg3's ps5 players into account to say it lost its players.....huh..... oh and an update, helldivers2 ain't even close to Starfield's player count
Mando is either stuck in a shit Star Wars world or a shit Bethesda game. Dude is just stuck in limbo.
NG Plus 11. Starborn personal atmosphere and grav dash takes seconds to traverse the planet, even fully encumbered. Faster than you would in any vehicle. I find synergizing my powers to space ninja a planet at light speed very cool. Also gives me time to use my elemental pull to pull rare resources straight from the ground on my way. No cutter needed. Planets are for building outposts and farming legendaries at poi's. The exploration is in SPACE with random space marker spawns. STOP LOOKING ON THE PLANETS. The more you play, level your ship, the more random SPACE encounters will happen. Not just epic battles with capital ships, but weird things as well. I once found a ship floating in space that had a bunch of cultist in it who had just drank the koolaid. They were all dead, but the back of the ship has 30 safes with all their belongings. Also who cares about the NPC's not reacting or being dumb? You are a space god. They don't even matter if you understand the game. Loading screens become less as you add more skill points in your scanning tree. No need to open the planet map anymore. just point and click. You can see all the pois from your ship, point click and land. No map needed. You can even point and click at other planets in the system and travel there without opening the map. Point. click. Travel. 1 loading screen of your ship traveling there. I'm really getting tired of these reviews from creators who spend more time making "Starfield sucks" videos, rather than actually playing the game itself. How many console commands did you use rather than play so you can give your viewers a correct review?
Your IQ must be fucking 50. I could give you a blank world with a OP character and you happy lmao. You ignore all the problems with "it doesn't matter" or "if you play for 120 hrs and get all these perks, then you not have so many loading screens" you a monkey. Keep playing your boring ass game, if it takes that little to entertain you the world must a exciting place so you have your fun little man
Yes the NPC's are hideous!
..
you damn right there
Wow wow wow Freddo's are not shitty chocolate...other than that I agree with almost all of the video 😂
Shitty in size 😂
How would you even go about making players able to land manually? I've just started starfield and I love it, I haven't found many issues other than leveling being sometimes too slow, ammo for guns you want to use being too expensive, and some planets feeling too empty.
Side quest and main quest waypoints sometimes being glitched.
It seems that you are all game developers!😂🙈
Bro talk about skull and bones😂😂😂
Stay tuned! Downloading that bad boy right now 😂
Tetris has better NPC's
Jeez player, what'd door nails ever do to you to deserve that kind of insult. Bwahahahahaha
😂😂
because you're on console....
Try transport vehicles in star citizen. Dont bother, you'll always crash die and explode
LMFAO
❤️
""""""
111
first again :D
💜
Why is everybody black as well? Lol
The crazy thing is mods couldn't even save this game
Yes. Still blows
Technically Starfield isn’t an open world game because you can’t actually go from one part to another part without loading in and out of the game so it’s just a bunch of cells and spaces clumped togethor not one large world sort of like the new Jedi games
This is the way
Never was terrible.
Star Citizen > Starfield