Matt Miller breaks down Bears' options with No. 9 overall pick | Parkins & Spiegel
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 апр 2024
- Draft analyst Matt Miller joined the Parkins & Spiegel Show to discuss how the Bears should use the No. 9 overall pick. Should general manager Ryan Poles and the Bears trade down? Or does it depend on who's available?
#ChicagoBears #MattMiller #nfl
Thumbnail images provided by Getty Images
Subscribe for the latest Chicago sports news and videos!
WEEKDAY SCHEDULE:
Mully & Haugh Show | 5:30 am to 10:00 am CST
Bernstein & Holmes Show | 10:00 am to 2:00 pm CST
Parkins & Spiegel Show | 2:00 pm to 6:00 pm CST
Listen live at t.co/SUrgd6d6uu
Watch live on Twitch at / chicago670thescore
Follow 670 the Score on social media:
/ 670thescore
/ 670thescore
/ 670thescore
670thescore... 
Спорт
Quality over quantity. No need to chase picks when you can get a solid blue chip guy at 9. We already the 3rd youngest team in the league. What’s the point in chasing more picks
Trying to be cute that’s the only reason to trade down. Don’t do it you have two picks in the top 10 use them.
@@MrDuds1984 exactly. No need to get cute. Just fill out the roster with quality players
Totally agree, the reason why the Packers consistently kick our ass up front they have about 7 1st rounders on their defense, premium players matter we need to stack them
@@JohnDcitizenthat’s not rlly why, they just always have a good HC, and a playoff caliber team while we r constantly rebuilding, last time we beat them we won the division because we actually had a competing football team
Agree for the most part but if you can get multiple ones you’ve at least gotta consider it.
D.J. Moore is our X-receiver. He is 26 years old.
We can't never have enough of those
It’s crazy he’s only that young. He’s mature as heck.
A trade down from 9 to the bills 28 would have to be a monumental package to even think of trading down that far
Ya if we got a 1st and a couple 2nds sign me up
Especially factoring in any pick from the Bills are going to likely be in the bottom 3rd of whatever round they are.
If Buffalo thought it needed to be that aggressive (giving up multiple early round picks) to replace Diggs, they wouldn't have traded him. Teams do not value WRs nearly as greatly as fans and the media. The Chiefs aren't taking a WR in the first round. Take a look at the last time Andy Reid, Sean Payton, Green Bay, Pittsburgh have done so. Buffalo will fill out their WR room, but the idea that they have to move up to get a guy is absurd.
I think the Bills would stand pat tbh. The WR you can get at 28 will still be damn good. Why give up ur 2nd when you have no 3rd round pick and to also give up next year's 1st? Seems like bad business if ur BUF
@@benoitwaffle5439 how do teams not value them when there's SIX TO SEVEN projected to go in the 1st round, and 3 top 10?
Great segment!
Odunze would be solid, but give me a solid tackle and subsequently a young line that can grow together for the next 3-4 years. I think their line is ok, but not as good as many think. Always a good idea to give your franchise guy as much time needed to carve up a defense.
Do people actually think the bears Oline even approaches “good”
Oooof. Id hate to see what those people consider “bad”
@@wentzr Agree. They have some nice pieces but need to get significantly better.
Whether the Bears take a WR early, or trade down, they need to find someone to stretch the field. DJ and Keenan are a special duo, but putting fear into safeties all over the league would go a long way in making this offense dynamic.
How insane is it that parkins asks a question then cannot wait for them to stop talking? Lmao
I mentioned before, I think Bears drafting Brenden Rice would be cool.
If the Bears trade out of #9 it's for a haul similar to the Fleecing Chicago put on Carolina last season. Moving on from #9 for an impact player that's already in the league makes more sense than a trade for picks. We're in "WIN NOW" mode!
Your team is not in win now mode. You don’t even know for sure who your QB is and even if it is Caleb there’s no guarantee he’s the guy. Calm down chief.
So because the Bears don’t have a second round pick they should move down from the 9th pick to gain an extra later round pick? Stop it they have two picks in the top 10 make the picks and accelerate the rebuild.
For real these clowns are just out of takes
Bears fans so used to sucking they dont realize its time to pivot from depth to BLue chippers. Super bowls are won by Pro-bowlers not a 50 man roster packed with "good" players
@@cuz_i_sedso9574Please don’t take these local sport fellas as the prototypical Chicago fan.
Do not trade back when you have a chance to take Odunze at #9 he is a huge talent. Remember Keenan Allen is in his thirties and maybe moved on after a year so having Odunze there to take over on a rookie contract would allow us to move for a elite edge in next years draft where there is a larger pool of them. Let’s have a go offensively for once and turn our franchise into a offensive force and not just a defensive one that we are known as
When I saw the New Orleans trade scenario floated out there where Bears exchange 9 and 75 for the 14 and 45 I thought Ok that seems like a plausible move, but since then everything I’ve seen is like the 15 and the 90 or something ridiculous like that. If I could get 14 and 45 or better with the depth of OT and WRs in this draft and Odunze and Alt were gone I might consider it. You could get a highly rated OL and a very nice receiver at those numbers but if it’s more like 15 and 90 I’ll stay put and take Fuaga or Latham at 10.
Where did you see a proposal where the Bears trade two higher picks for two lower picks? Literally nobody is reporting that the Bears will trade 9 and 75 for 15 and 90...because they're BOTH worse picks!!!
Dumb Dumb Dumb
@@Bewbscueser learn to read. Google New Orleans Bears trade picks No 9. It was floated out there the scenario Bears trade 9 and 75 and get back 14 and 44. I said trading for a lower pick like the 90 with the 14 wouldn’t be worth it.
There's only one pick at 9 should be Bowers. Brock and Caleb coming in together will be fantastic to help build long term chemistry in the duo.
I think it would be tough to get anyone in the top ten picks ro trade down. They would have to be offered a pretty good haul and next years picks. Seems more so in a top heavy draft. Bears are in a great position at 9. Especially if four quarter backs do come off the the board beforehand. With MHJ going as well that leaves two picks before the Bears are up again. It almost feels like that 9 pick is a number 4 pick. Use it. This is a pick that would be hard to miss on no matter who you take. Trade down and you may find a diamond in the rough. Maybe. If it's a top heavy draft they'll take the best player available no matter the position. We dont know who they value the most so try to keep an open mind. We may be surprised
Update: Ryan Poles announced that after measuring the front doors of Halas Hall it is obvious Caleb Williams’ inflated ego will not fit. CHI trades down withWAS for (at least) #2 pick, 2024 second, 2025 #1 and 2026#1…CHI takes Jayden Daniels then trades up from 9 to get Odunze…
I think Matt is going to get his edge rusher to help Sweat
I think WR, Edge are the priorities. If Odunze isnt there then you can trade back into the top 15 and take an edge. No way in hell the bears trade #9 to the Bills unless its a haul. Id say #28, #60 this year and a first next and a 3rd next year. Im not giving up Odunze for a swap and a 2nd rounder. Hell no!
Verse Dexter and Sweat, we wouldn’t have to worry about the line for 5 years and our secondary gets even better because of it
I definitely want an edge over reciever
If Nabers somehow gets to 9 I will run the card in personally lol dont think he will be there. Odunze could be though...
Odunze could be at 12
agreed. malik is tyreek hill / julio jones. don’t pass on him.
@@TheJunmengo Jets would worry me at 10 though
Do what you have to do to get Joe Alt
Unless we trade back no further than 12 we lose. Every player we would love to have is going to be taken. We need a Tackle, Edge, and a Guard then maybe another WR. We have Moore, Allen and Scott yea he's young but let's see him develop. We can wait another year for a WR can wait until next year. We need to protect our new QB or give Sweat a twin on the other side.
If we could get a franchise qb and a top notch edge we will have completely flipped our team much more than picking a reciever
A good player at a premium position at a low cost is a great player
The Vikings, Raiders and Broncos are very interested in JJ McCarthy and will probably try to move up to get ahead of one another to get him. Then the last two of those teams may be trying to move up to get Bo Nix. There's a chance that the top 3 WRs will be gone too. Which leaves Brian Thomas Jr. as the next WR. With the 9th pick Chicago could go with Brock Bowers too. Since Chicago's defense played so well last year and the offense didn't I feel strongly about them going offense with pick at 9. I really doubt MHJ, Nabers, Alt, Odunze and Bowers will be there and if any of them are Chicago should get one of them in that order. We can be sure that the Vikings, Broncos and Raiders will be playing leapfrog to get their man. I would not trade down past the Raiders. We do the swap and get their 2nd Rd pick at minimum. Then draft either WR "Brian Thomas Jr" or
Tackle "Fuaga" or "Fautanu." Then get the pass rusher or more offense with that 2nd Rd pick!
3T, WR (deep), and LT are not priority. What we have now is better than what we could sign or draft later. We NEED a young DE with Sweat. The team will roll.
If Nabers is there at 9 take it. Allen will get hurt at some point.
why doesnt anybody want jared verse??? odunze and that 4:45 speed scares me and an OL in the first rd is risky ... trade down if alt or verse are gone .. a WR would be good to take keenans place in a couple years but WRs are easier to find than beasts in the trenches.. you gotta be inept to mess this up imo
mother of GOD how many more "break downs" before April 25?😎
1000
Marvin Harrison jr at number 9
Man go to bed
No you Draft a center or LT
He left off McKonkey who will be there end of first or early round 2.
Didn't Chicago have one of the best defenses in the later half of the season? Then one of the worst offenses last year? Then there should be "NO" scenario where Chicago drafts a defender with pick 9! CAN WE SAY ONE DAY THAT CHICAGO HAS THE BEST OFFENSE FOR CRYING OUT LOUD!
Mel miper Jr had josh Allen 1 his sophomore yr
Hopefully Poles will draft Alt and Johnson.
I'd go ol at 9 there's 2 great ones and at least one if not both will be there at 9
Agree, Barbara! I don’t think our line is as good as many think. Ok, not great. Put the 5 beat o lineman on the field and let them grow.
Thats 1st round picks from buffalo
If it's all offense 1-8, then you take the best QB at 1, and the best defensive end at 9.
The Bears need to draft Brock Bowers end of story he will be our Travis Kelce
We already have our TK Kmet. They are just starting to use him and he is still young and has so much potential. Let's see what Waldon gets out of him.
BTJr 11 LSU
We dont want picks in the 5th 6th and 7th. No players are there. Poles did this right. Small number of top picks in this draft. A ton of picks in 25
Rule #1 Get your QB. Rule #2 Protect him. Take Olu or Alt and move Braxton to guard. Caleb's rookie year is O-line injury proof.
Braxton isn't a guard. You don't just move guys to a position they've never played. If you take Fashanu you then have quality depth at a premium position.
Agree!
We don't need to move Jones just draft Alt, Olu or Verse.
Bowers is better than Rome and Nabors. That's the pick at 9.
Stop
Not @MattMiller being a bit of a douche about Braxton Jones' value as a player. 😬
No receivers at 9
Find a top Center
x.worthy (gault 2.0) w/ a late(r) 1st rd. selection if "big pole" poles trades back once or twice from #9.
Worthy is a one trick pony. Over drafting speed is something we can count on the Raiders to do.
@@Bewbscueser that's very true, just win baby!! that 1 trick is historic. i am picturing allen and moore with worthy taking the top off, yikes!!
@@bijanravanbakhsh3530 Tyler Scott and Velus Jones were both drafted in recent years to add a pure vertical aspect. Jones is a return guy only and Scott underwhelmed as a rookie but will likely get a chance to try again with snaps from Z and the slot. My hope is Rome Odunze will be there at 9. Even without adding another guy at the top of the draft the Bears have the ability to warp the geometry of defenses vertically with Caleb at QB.
Bowers?
I really hate a so called expert positing a super dumb take. There's no way Buffalo goes from 28 to 9. Sure they need a receiver but they go into the draft with a ton of needs especially on defense. There's no way they burn the necessary draft capital to move up 19 spots especially to draft a guy the Bears themselves covet. This is just a ridiculous notion and if Buffalo does make that call they'll likely get laughed off the phone unless they're ready to do something objectively stupid.
The stupid...it burns!!!
No Receivers
get an edge, find a reciever somewhere else.
malik is tyreek hill / julio jones. don’t pass on him. id pass on any other player aside from caleb and malik.
More like Jamar chase than tyreke. They skill set is completely different
@@christhetraveler4817 but he is much faster than chase and is about as good in and out of breaks and stop start as any WR i've ever seen.
either way, he is an amazing prospect
@@shake6321 you should compare Malik’s and chase’s combine numbers. They are identical across the board.
@@christhetraveler4817 you know, i didnt know chase tested out that fast. impressive. nabers to me looks faster on the field but who knows.
Honestly Xavier Worthy would be my pick @9 idc
😂😂
Gassed on that 40 huh 😂😂
The Bills need a true X not a skinny gadget guy who can only run two routes.
So we go with Braxton Jones even though he is inferior to Joe Alt because of money?😂