Yeah, the famous “epic ratio” for broad and “larger than life” movies!! There are many reasons to love it, just as an example I will give four: Star Wars, The Lord of the Rings, Gladiator and Terminator 2, along with many others that also benefit from its great scope and have excellent cinematography!! FUN FACT: many don't know, but the difference between 2.35 and 2.39 is that: when capturing images in 35 mm with anamorphic lenses, the result was the aspect ratio of 2.35, but from the 1970s onwards, to splice the film's negative images and then to disguise them during projection on the big screen, it was necessary, in the final theatrical print, to reduce the height of the frame a little, resulting in the aspect ratio of 2.39. Sometimes people say 2.40 (or 2.4), but this is just a rounding of 2.39. The difference between 2.35 and 2.39 is imperceptible to the naked eye and the two ratios are interchangeable. In other words, in practice both are basically the same thing.
To simulate 2.4 : 1 within a 16:9 project, add a 13% crop to the top and bottom of your timeline with a Premiere adjustment layer.. This is necessary if you are using multiple aspect ratios within the same project, or if you want the no-fuss of exporting in a widely accepted 16:9 standard that's easier to host.
16:9 wide screen ratio, also known as 1.78:1, and 21:9 ultra-wide screen ratio, also known as 2.35:1, each on LCD TVs, LED TVs, Smartphones or laptops, PCs at 16: 9, and on PC Or Smartphone at 21:9
Thank you very much! I would add to this 1080 x 460 for broadest compatibility. If one adds 74 padding top and bottom it can be output formally as 16:9. This can be achieved eg. with freeware XMedia Recode.
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
You might also want to consider the cinematic 2.39:1 aspect ratio common in many feature films: ruclips.net/video/tkAEBBaYZ2Q/видео.html
Yeah, the famous “epic ratio” for broad and “larger than life” movies!! There are many reasons to love it, just as an example I will give four: Star Wars, The Lord of the Rings, Gladiator and Terminator 2, along with many others that also benefit from its great scope and have excellent cinematography!!
FUN FACT: many don't know, but the difference between 2.35 and 2.39 is that: when capturing images in 35 mm with anamorphic lenses, the result was the aspect ratio of 2.35, but from the 1970s onwards, to splice the film's negative images and then to disguise them during projection on the big screen, it was necessary, in the final theatrical print, to reduce the height of the frame a little, resulting in the aspect ratio of 2.39.
Sometimes people say 2.40 (or 2.4), but this is just a rounding of 2.39.
The difference between 2.35 and 2.39 is imperceptible to the naked eye and the two ratios are interchangeable. In other words, in practice both are basically the same thing.
Thanks again, Rodrigo. I enjoy your comments/contribution!
THANK YOU SO MUUUUUCHHH !!!! I searching everywhere on the internet and NOTHING !! Love YOU !!
Best... comment... ever! You're welcome. And thank YOU!
To simulate 2.4 : 1 within a 16:9 project, add a 13% crop to the top and bottom of your timeline with a Premiere adjustment layer.. This is necessary if you are using multiple aspect ratios within the same project, or if you want the no-fuss of exporting in a widely accepted 16:9 standard that's easier to host.
16:9 wide screen ratio, also known as 1.78:1, and 21:9 ultra-wide screen ratio, also known as 2.35:1, each on LCD TVs, LED TVs, Smartphones or laptops, PCs at 16: 9, and on PC Or Smartphone at 21:9
Exactly what I was looking for. Thank you!
You're very welcome. Glad I could help!
Love the music and footage!
Thanks!
Appreciate the quick info and the fact it wasn't an 8 min video in order to get there (others) lol. Cheers.
Thanks! Glad you enjoyed it, and thanks for takin the time to leave a comment.
Very helpful. Thanks, Undu!
Glad it was helpful!
Thank you very much! I would add to this 1080 x 460 for broadest compatibility. If one adds 74 padding top and bottom it can be output formally as 16:9. This can be achieved eg. with freeware XMedia Recode.
Thanks for the info!
Thanks for this!
My pleasure!
Thanks .....gonna try)
Good luck!
thank very much 🙏
You're very welcome!
Thanks
You're welcome.
Thank you
You're very welcome.
Welcome my 2.35:1 I can use 2048x871 because this look good