The case was solved but the jury failed. I was the boss mentioned. Williams, the cowardly murderer was not a business partner, he was muscle brought in to help in a dispute. Desi Noonan was involved and the dispute was sorted. There were two trials. The first one was done and dusted for the prosecution as Williams testified. He came over as the semi-literate fool that he is. A new trial was brought forward because a well known gangster, Flannery came forward and said that I told him the real murderers name. I never met Flannery. Williams declined to stand in the dock in the second trial. It also went well but the jury found Williams not guilty. Don't say,"Not solved,' it was.
Thanks for your input which I am sure other people will be interested to read. However, it was 'unsolved' from the perspective that for starters, no one was convicted. Also, its more of a platitude. I do quite a few cases where the situation is similar, for example Beatrice Greig ruclips.net/video/4cvwqimE8F4/видео.html and it would be quite erroneous for me to say anything was solved when no parties were convicted. Further, I cover cases such as the Westwick Gardens baby ruclips.net/video/LXXPShX4i5Y/видео.html where its not even certain there was a crime and term unsolved generally means that there is at the very least an element of mystry still overhanging the case. Its also interesting to hear what you have to say as there is very little information about the case that is realidy available. There is one question I have, as I don't do 'research' beyond what is in the public domain, and I don't intend to do the video again, but is the location correct? I got the impression later that it happened near Sacville Street or at the entrance to Bombay Street from Sackville Street as after watching it a few times I wondered why they would fly post in that part as its not really a main thoroughfare. Maybe they were doing Sackville Street and where near or at Bombay Street whe nit happened? Do you know? Not that I intend to do the video again but that hs always bugged me.
@@uktruecrime I have replied once but cannot find my input. The reason for flyposting that area is its close proximity to UMIST. It happened in the place stated. Why has it bugged you and can you give me a link to the vid?
@@jamescarr1467 Its this video that I am referring to. As ever, after I made it I read a bit more and in the Independent article which you should be able to find by Googling it which says 'Mr Williams left and returned about 11pm when they were working at the junction of Sackville Street and Bombay Street, walked towards them and shot him twice, according to Mr Carr' which indicated that it happened at the junction and not in Bombay Street. Its only a little thing but as I am in London and all I had was 'Bombay Street' to work with and so I went there on my bike, as you can see in the video, I filmed the street, but upon reflection, as per the Independent article, I would have been better filming the juntion. I dont always know where it was, but often find out later. For example, in this Anthony Cook video I filmed most of Kincardine Street as I don't know where it happened ruclips.net/video/KfDhXfl5kxI/видео.html A better example, (sorry to bore you) is Florence Steadman. I filmed the whole od Sherbroke Street in Fulham, but I later found out that it took place at a certain number which was just a bit further on from where I filmed. ruclips.net/video/u8c-ljnNQsI/видео.html Its a long Street. However, Bombay Street is quite short and so I was less likely to get it wrong. Either way, it should give viewers a good impression of Bombay Street.
The case was solved but the jury failed. I was the boss mentioned. Williams, the cowardly murderer was not a business partner, he was muscle brought in to help in a dispute. Desi Noonan was involved and the dispute was sorted. There were two trials. The first one was done and dusted for the prosecution as Williams testified. He came over as the semi-literate fool that he is. A new trial was brought forward because a well known gangster, Flannery came forward and said that I told him the real murderers name. I never met Flannery. Williams declined to stand in the dock in the second trial. It also went well but the jury found Williams not guilty. Don't say,"Not solved,' it was.
Thanks for your input which I am sure other people will be interested to read. However, it was 'unsolved' from the perspective that for starters, no one was convicted. Also, its more of a platitude. I do quite a few cases where the situation is similar, for example Beatrice Greig ruclips.net/video/4cvwqimE8F4/видео.html and it would be quite erroneous for me to say anything was solved when no parties were convicted. Further, I cover cases such as the Westwick Gardens baby ruclips.net/video/LXXPShX4i5Y/видео.html where its not even certain there was a crime and term unsolved generally means that there is at the very least an element of mystry still overhanging the case.
Its also interesting to hear what you have to say as there is very little information about the case that is realidy available. There is one question I have, as I don't do 'research' beyond what is in the public domain, and I don't intend to do the video again, but is the location correct? I got the impression later that it happened near Sacville Street or at the entrance to Bombay Street from Sackville Street as after watching it a few times I wondered why they would fly post in that part as its not really a main thoroughfare. Maybe they were doing Sackville Street and where near or at Bombay Street whe nit happened? Do you know? Not that I intend to do the video again but that hs always bugged me.
@@uktruecrime I have replied once but cannot find my input. The reason for flyposting that area is its close proximity to UMIST. It happened in the place stated. Why has it bugged you and can you give me a link to the vid?
@@jamescarr1467 Its this video that I am referring to. As ever, after I made it I read a bit more and in the Independent article which you should be able to find by Googling it which says 'Mr Williams left and returned about 11pm when they were working at the junction of Sackville Street and Bombay Street, walked towards them and shot him twice, according to Mr Carr' which indicated that it happened at the junction and not in Bombay Street. Its only a little thing but as I am in London and all I had was 'Bombay Street' to work with and so I went there on my bike, as you can see in the video, I filmed the street, but upon reflection, as per the Independent article, I would have been better filming the juntion. I dont always know where it was, but often find out later. For example, in this Anthony Cook video I filmed most of Kincardine Street as I don't know where it happened ruclips.net/video/KfDhXfl5kxI/видео.html A better example, (sorry to bore you) is Florence Steadman. I filmed the whole od Sherbroke Street in Fulham, but I later found out that it took place at a certain number which was just a bit further on from where I filmed. ruclips.net/video/u8c-ljnNQsI/видео.html Its a long Street. However, Bombay Street is quite short and so I was less likely to get it wrong. Either way, it should give viewers a good impression of Bombay Street.
ruclips.net/video/lAZnjgnoyvQ/видео.html
My video actually shows the wrong part of Bombay Street.