QUICK SERVED: WOMEN'S FINAL ANALYSIS & DJOKOVIC VS. ALCARAZ PREVIEW - Wimbledon 2024
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 18 окт 2024
- Barbora Krejcikova is the 2024 Women's Wimbledon Champion after her 3-set match against Jasmine Paolini. Andy and Jon Wertheim spend some time going over their thoughts of the match before getting into their preview of the Men's Final: Carlos Alcaraz vs Novak Djokovic. Check in after tomorrow's match for our Quick Served with Andy's post-match thoughts/feelings!
Pre-order your Ozlo Sleepbuds today and save up to $120: ozlosleep.com/
Served is sponsored by Olipop! Check out the link below and use the code: SERVED20 to get 20% off your order: drinkolipop.co...
About dang time Andy! We’ve been waiting all day!
Quiet down and strap yourself in for the real thing tomorrow. Gonna be a belter.
Are u betting?
@@JamieHolcombeNo. Are you?
@@andieolivia No
literally
Andy is deeply knowledgeable in tennis. Jon is highly intelligent, perceptive and lucid. Great team.
Thank you for doing this podcast! I am putting this in front of all my tennis friends. Excellent product. Keep up the great work. This is really needed!
LOL how Andy calls Carlos, “Chuckster”
Great tennis podcast. Well done and thank you!
Jon please show some love for Paolini lol. I am always hoping for you to say something nice about Paolini. Invite her to the podcast or tennis channel. Big fan of Paolini now.
Thanks Andy for yet another great show! And thanks for you continued coverage of Womens tennis.
Paolini has truly captured my heart! I also love watching her game ❤
I was a bit heartbroken that Paolini didn't win. Enjoying so much her path ❤
My heart broke a little too. I do look forward to seeing more of her, I enjoy her game ❤
Best tennis analysis podcast hands down. Thank you for the insight as usual Andy and John!
Andy is stellar at analyzing matches 🤩
You nailed Paolini's name Andy, way to go!
Great analysis. You do this job very well man
I need to see roger in this show talking about the good old days
That would be the DREAM !
Andy reminds me so much of JJ Reddick. Hope he reaches same heights as JJ
Exactly I didn’t think of that you are right.
Congrats to Barbora! ❤️🎉
Barbora Krejcikova has the best winning percentage in Grand Slam finals among everyone who played 10 finals. 12-1 in Grand Slam finals (.923 W%).
And... she has now won at least one Grand Slam final in each of the last seven years (2018-2024).
I love Jasmine Paolini ❤ no matter what the last month was epic
In the end... it came down to Jasmine double faulting on break point in the third set.
That was pretty much the difference in the match.
I can't get over how much Jon Wertheim acts and sounds like Tom Arnold 😂
Mr. Roddick, I don't think Alcaraz is so scared for the backhand - be that to use it himself because he has improved his backhand to be a weapon and has a good slice. To focus on one side would be a losing tactic for Djokovic (which he surely knows himself) since it will become too predictable.
Great preview! From real tennis experts! 😊
Dear Sir, any plans to insert time stamps so that one can go straight to the interested topic?
Andy coaching some of these young US players would be great to see
Andy can you make a video detailing your partnership with Lacoste?
Bold claim, but probably correct, that Carlos has the greatest drop shot of all time. Fed has to be right there tho too. I also credit Fed for bringing the shot back into vogue. Sampras and Agassi and those guys weren’t playing DS’s, nor were Borg and McEnroe. Fed brought that business back.
Jon, i still have my copy of Venus Envy and hope one day will have you sign it.
" Tie " Awareness 😂😂😂
Great Show !!!
Thanks guys !
you should do live commentary
Not something Wimbledon-specific, but in a future podcast I'd love to hear Andy talk about his perspective of his 2003 summer, from Queens to the US Open. He was still young and perhaps viewed more as a "really good young guy, soon-future top player" than a favorite at majors going into the summer. Maybe kind of like Sinner throughout 2022-23 until Sinner just started winning a ton. Then winning Queens, Indianapolis, 2 Masters Series and the US Open in the span of a few months must have been wild. Did he feel invincible? Did it all go too fast for him to process his sudden string of wins? Did he feel like the favorite going into the US Open? Did he feel caught off guard by the tough Cincinnati final against Fish or the US Open semi against Nalbandian? Just a lot of questions and I'd love to hear him talk a bit about how it was for him to go on that ride.
Oooo the SPACE betweeeeeeen
Wind was big factor in that final I think..lets see what will be 1 year later
Quick question..what are Wertheim's credentials to analyze these big matches?? LOVE Andy Roddick and everyone knows his credentials....it shows with every show Andy' comments on...cannot say the same about Wertheim who too often feels his commentary is equal to a former #1 tennis champion..
100% agreed. Wertheim is a tennis writer and his columns aren’t bad but his commentary is super trite, shallow and borders on insipid
Can't really agree on that. I feel Jon Wertheim is a perfect foil for Andy, respects the fact that Andy has been there, done that, etc. Jon seems to know his place in the scheme of things and adds value with his greater knowledge of what's happening in terms of stats, who's done what this year. I've come to think of him as an excellent journalist based on this channel alone. And I guess that if he's here, it's because Andy Roddick thinks so too. And as you say, Andy Roddick's credentials make him an excellent judge.
What are your credentials to be able to determine whether Jon is, or isn't qualified to properly analyze tennis, other than some subjective preference? It's not as if there are a set of specific objective baseline achievements or criteria that hv to be met in order for an individual to be "qualified" to discuss tennis!
if Andy trusts Jon’s insights enough to bring him onto this podcast then you shouldn’t really worry.
You are less qualified to judge Wertheim's competence than he is to talk tennis. lack of self-awareness is a serious personality flaw.
Best drop shot in the history of tennis lol yeah sure Andy
Absolutely unrelated, but will there be “let er rip, tater chip” or #chucker merch? :)
Love John. But what’s up with the tie today?! Lol
Stop calling Carlos Alcaraz a "kid", Jon Wertheim. This is a young man who shows more maturity both on and off court than many fellow players, and more professionalism than a condescending aged journalist like yourself.
Hope the kid wins.
Your comment about respecting the Alcaraz power making the drop shot more lethal makes sense when I remember Sharapova in the later years of her career started using the drop shot to success. Not that I think she disguised it well (maybe idk I'm a scrub and it's been a few years since I've seen her play) but yea you expect her to rip the ball not drop it.
GUILLERMO CORIA had the best dropshot in the history of tennis...
Rome Final 2005 was the best match of all-time.
I like Carlos dropshot variety way more
Same story we are hearing especially about "nextgen guys", yet Novak continues to prove them wrong, Thing is that the best chance all this nextgen guys have is at first couple of matches, but after Novak figures out their game, all off their rivalry's turns one-sided in Novak's favor.
How do you explain Sinner beating Djokovic recently? Alcaraz will beat Djokovic tomorrow no doubt about that. At best Djokovic will win one set.
If Novak has figured out this younger generation then why doesn’t he have 2 more slams in his bag? Novak may win tomorrow, but he’s won bugger all this yr. He obviously has figured out the next gen?
Your analysis is right but Sinner and Alcaraz are a different breed. He won't get the best of them if he keeps on playing. In fact, it will probably be one of the reasons to retire after this season.
@@Meko2021Novak took it easy first half of the year , no much training plus knee thing .
He needed a break .
@@garywright9715 well you are probably not old enough to remember 2017-18 , when Novak had elbow surgery, pre surgery he was not winning much and loosing to mediocre players but came back a month or two later and won Wimbledon2018 and the rest of the Wimbledon's played prior to 2023 including an epic 2019 against RF. And as for the next gen guys, here are the guys who were considered future champions and almost all of them begin their rivalry with a lead until 2:0 - 2:1; M. Raonic 0:12, D. Thiem 5:7, A. Zverev 4:8, D. Medvedev 5:10, S. Tsitsipas 2:11, J. Siner 3:4, H.Rune 2:4, C. Alcaraz 2:3.
34:20 "Novak has won more matches in majors ... significantly more than Dominic Thiem has won matches total in his career"
And Dominic Thiem was one of the best player in his tennnis generation.
That just shows how relatively DISMAL the competition of Thiems generation is and was.
Today these players are roughly between 28 and 32 years old, like: Medvedev, Jarry, Kachanov, Thompson, Norrie, Ofner, Giron, Djere, Sonego, Beretini, Eubanks, Kokkinakis, Coria, Koepfer ...
Only 3 of them are currently in the top 40. wow
That is the real reason why and Federer and Nadal and Djokovic extended their tennis career up to their late 30.
And between them; Djokovic exploit that the most.
Has anyone asked Novak if his knee was bothering him throughout the year, he was not extending rallies all year, and perhaps it was not lack of motivation, or getting old, but just a problem in his knee that did not fully manifest itself until the French Open when it finally tore.
Carlito looks like a force of nature, so people think he's unbeatable, but Novak knows how to deal with him.
Carlito's complexion is much clearer this year, so he must have stopped with the PEDs or found a way to mitigate their effects.
Novak said himself it was bothering him before Rg , but also Ivanisevic said he hasn't been training much first half of the year .
He needed a break i guess after 25 years .
Or he just grew up which cleared the acne...
He is not even that muscular and his physique (not his athleticism) is easily achievable without steroids.
@@tijgertjekonijnwordopgegeten It is just a little suspicious that he hits his forehand, at 19 yo, harder that anyone else on the tour despite being only 6 feet tall, Juan Martin del Potro had the hardest forehand but he was 6'6" tall.
Either wear a tie or don't. This loose tie look reminds me of being back at school when I was 11/12
Looks like he took his tie off later in the Podcast 😂😂
That high volley Novak missed was the decider in last year's Wimbledon. He probably thought he had to make the shot too good or Carlos would run it down and maybe he was right.
Can you explain what this hall of fame thing is and what it does for you?
I noticed that Novak was not trying to rally with Musetti and did drop shots. Could he be in trouble if extended rallies are too physical?
Good question, a question Alcaraz will be asking today. If Ferrero does his job he'll tell Alcaraz to try and rally for longer than normal to test this and not to big too soon as often he does normally.
Nole in 5
Both players are a year older than their last slam final match up. That SHOULD benefit the younger player with Alcaraz in the ascendancy as opposed to Djokovic nearer to the end of his career. Theoretically it feels like this match shouldn’t be as close as last year’s final (in Alcaraz’s favour) but there are so many other factors to consider and who is really going to bring their form on the day?
Great show. Jon keeps of being off though.
he looks like somebody off american pie
Roddick is awesome. But I hate Wertheim so much.
Andy, Paolini comes from Paolo. Paul. Paul is not peiool. Sao Paulo is not Sao Peiuulo. Pa O Lini.
i think novak will win in 4 or 5, lets see
Mr.Roddick try to keep the podcast shorter and clean up your background wall .
women's tennis seemed to be righting itself- hopefully this was a blip... back in the day- you could throw a dart at the draw and pick the winner better than the pundits.
novak had his as s handed to him lol he did not see that before
Jon is a novak hater
it shows
jasmine is the better human.
Joker has been beaten 3-0 in 3 slam finals, probably playing better then than he does now. I doubt it will be 3-0 tomorrow as Carlos seems to struggle to focus at times, but it might be. Or Novak might beat him 3-0. You never know, but don't assume we are going to get a 5 or even 4 set 'classic'.
Add chapters
"Fan long before played", what in the fuckin womb?!
I think Alcaraz will beat Djokovic... BUT I hope Djokovic beats Alcaraz. I want to see Djokovic win #25, breaking Margaret Court's 24 Grand Slam wins, set in 1975, a 49 year old record. A Djokovic win would also tie Federer's 8 Wimbledon wins. My odds are 60% Alcaraz, 40% Djokovic to win. Novak's movement hasn't really been tested and Alcaraz's drop shot is brilliant and will force Novak to run. Alcaraz is a phenom. He will have plenty of time to break Djokovic's all time major record. Many of us just want Djokovic to get over the finish line. To be fair, Novak could've already had more than 25 major wins, if he controlled his temper, resulting in disqualification at the 2020 US Open and if he were vaccinated. With Djokovic's brand of genius, however, we must accept the complete person, warts and all.
Margaret Court? You cannot be serious
@@0nFoot ... take a time out, John.
@@davidhunternyc1Djokovic has won the last two matches against Alcaraz. People are remembering the win at Wimbledon, but not their next encounters. I would tend to think that Djokovic has figured out how to beat Alcaraz and will do so again tomorrow.
You guys put words in Novaks mouth. Now you wanted him to loose so that he can't equal Roger. You are insane. The media is saying that not Novak.
I’m no Novak fan, but unlike me he didn’t take the jab and I applaud him for his integrity.
As for how this plays out….I have no idea. Any and all scenarios I can see here. Novak or Carlos in straight sets or a 5 set thriller and everything in between. I wouldn’t want to bet on this outcome as I see no clear advantage on either side.
Drop it like it’s hot Carlitos ☺️
I Hope Alcaraz beats Djokovic and when the match is over, Alcaraz starts to air play a violin with his racquet!!😂😂
Harsh. But funny! 🤣
Talk about tennis and leave the player. You always trying so hard to find anything to say about Novak. Why you hate him so much.? You know the answer.
Do you know why Nole is playing violin with his racquet? Because his daughter asked him since she started playing violin a couple of months ago. Novak is the best tennis player of all time, he can celebrate however he likes. And btw, Nole wins tomorrow in 4. 🇷🇸🔥🎉💥
@@Biki0810 wonderful! Congrats
🤣 would be funny, but that's more of a Ben Shelton move ;)
Alcaraz -138 Djo +122
" Thats the beauty of our sport, it doesnt take much to change your fortunes" JW being politically correct, try doing that in the mens tournament. Woman's one never knows.
What do you mean by this? Unexpected men have life changing tournaments too, they just usually end at semis. If Saba played and got to the semis as would be expected it really isn't much different.
Paolini and Krejcikova aren't randoms, a gs winner and recent runner up. They just weren't on our minds.
@@fabianstockwin952 ...how often? is it once in lifetime event, yes, does it happen often in the womens, yes.
@@FrankSouza-ss7cz yeah I dont get how what JW is saying is politically correct but okily. Prior to the establishment of the big 3 we had different people in finals all the time on mens side of draw, so I dont see how what is happening in womens tennis is much different to what has happened on men's side for majority of its history...
This analysis is completely lacking form of the year, the results during the tournament etc. Solely focussed on a generic take on Alcaraz and Djokovic qualities but not set in the context of the now. Would have expected to hear more about e.g. what Djokovic' level actually is right now and the same for Alcaraz and how that turns out. Because based on overall timeless qualities it is a coin flip. But surely the current standings must be a factor? E.g. Djokovic didn't record a top 10 win this year, it is his first final (after not having to play the quarters and not even close having to play a top 10 calibre player with serious weapons) - the point is, it is hard to asses what his current level actually is. Also, there is the context of the knee and as another commenter asked: was this a reason for using even more dropshots in the semi's? How will that tactic work against Carlos? In short: there was no analysis that is actually insightful for todays context.
Well well, like I said. The analysis in this podcast was completely lacking the context of the now. Djokovic was by chance handed the easiest final spot in history and still produced more UE than winners during the tournament. And was used like a rag doll by the baby/adolescent t-rex. Until 22yo are normally learning years... incredible how good he is when 25...
Novak will win in 4 sets because he's fresher, has played 4 hours less and has far more experience as the G.O.A.T with zero pressure. His knees are fully healed so it's not going to be a factor. Alcaraz can only win in five sets if he plays at his absolute best which we haven't seen all through the tournament. Unlikely for him to produce it in the finals. Novak loves to beat these younger guys. Novak is still playing because of his desire to play Alcaraz and these younger generation. Novak brings his best against Alcaraz and Sinner always. Novak will not lose to Carlitos. Carlos has to beat him and that is a very tough order. Lastly, Novak wants to shut everyone up for a while about singing about beautiful and smiling King Carlos. He will spoil the story line that all the reporters want to write.
Thank you for the perfect explanation! ❤
I have no idea who is going to win. Novak bringing his best obviously doesn’t guarantee a win with either. And the 4 hrs difference? At 16 yrs younger I doubt that is a problem. Carlos has to beat him? Duh!
You are trying to convince yourself but not others. Being fresher is not a factor (for Alcaraz) and even doubtful with the knee and lack of match play. Novak has no pressure? It could be his last GS final and last chance (probably) to win Wimbledon. Whereas Carlos has 3 grand slams in the pocket and expected to have a whole career in front of him. There is pressure for them both since it is a final. They both can handle that well (obviously).
@KCNwokeye. Your explanation didn’t quite pan out. Carlos not only beat him but did it in short order. I thought this could happen, but I certainly didn’t know.
I know that I would like to see Alcaraz to win this one. Djokovic will try to win of course, but I’m hoping that Carlos can run him all over the court, to expose his movement because he hasn’t been really tested. Im not watching the final, because I don’t want to hear Djokovic pretend story about wanting to win Wimbledon as a child.
Have him tested for PED, we will see a fair match.
I hope you are talking about novak
read up on how often tennis players are tested and reassess your comment
@@skabbaraju1 yes I am talking about Novak, has he ever been tested? No, never!
Jon Wertheim is so dismissive towards womens tennis.
Rightly so
explain
His knowledge level of the WTA is so shallow - you can tell he’s a typical tennis ninny and not a true fan
Wta stinks
Women's tennis is an embarrassment to sports. And no way should they earn the some money as the men. About half would be fair.
You can not ignore Novak Djokovic in grand Slam final joker doing joker 🃏 thing in clutch and big point so Carlos need to to mentally prepared for all the things because Novak Djokovic have 36 final experience Carlos Alcaraz is on his own way to brake Novak Djokovic all the record he is best tennis ever produce but the only difference at this moment is experienced and Novak is little bit advantage of that Carlos never lose any grand Slam final before because he never face Novak Djokovic and sinner before in grand Slam final so that's the only reason lets see im very excited and cheer for Carlos Alcaraz
But but i never ever bet against Novak Djokovic 😂❤
Script was for Novak Djokovic and Carlos lose his first final on sunday as a carlos fan this match gonna hurt him but he can't win every thing
What? Carlos beat Novak in last years final. It’s a rematch. He has more experience now, but the pressure is on him
Novak does not have pressure for this final knee or knee. He will do what is best .
Mate, carlos literally had to win against Sinner for the FO this year, beat Sinner at the USO in the QF in 2022 and beat Djokovic last year at Wimbledon. If you can't even have these simple facts right...
@@fwvw7056 Carlos Alcaraz is going to lose his first grand Slam final today and you and fedal crying harder in the corner 😂😂
@@geetadasadiya9348 oh my, you are surely betting all your life savings now you already know he is going to lose?
Federer was making finals without dropping sets and being ,,chalenged” , no one bat an eye at his chances in those finals , Novak gets to this final losing 2 sets and without much effort everyone is like , but he wasn’t challenged so we’re not sure of his chances , gtfo of here with this bs !!!
Alcaraz will win bz Djokovic wants it really bad and that may be a negative for hi, he wants to make it 8 to equal roger.
Carlos was born in 2003 and Novak started dating his wife in 2005 😂 just sayin 😮
Yes this is Novak's first finals of the year, thanks to the luck of draw and a pass at quarters.. a reminder that he isnt that good anymore and his opponents being scared of him. He is very beatable! He has.no weapons but playing defensive all the time!!
This finals is in Carlitos hands. If he makes more errors he will lose!
Sounds like he has elite defence and hence still good enough to win slams
Who has the tough draw in this tournament? Novak side òf a draw was not easy too the only thing here those players were beaten earlier. Walk over even Alex was going to be beaten by Novak.
Rocks by the side of the road could offer up a better analysis than that which your stupid remarks have given us. I'm ashamed for you. Hell, if you've got a pet of any kind, I'm sure that pet is ashamed for you as well.
obviously have not been watching tennis since his/her favorite player has (semi) retired. Novak's game these days is most complete I have ever seen. He was forced to change his game so he can last longer compared to someone else that never tried to do so...
Carlos had easiest draw yet he struggled
nole has easy draw carlos must concentrate but carlos also tennis needs carlos doesnt need nole
What a meat-headed remark!!! Human beings at their most stupid are simply without shame.
Hahahaha!!!! With Carlos, there us nowhere safe to hit! If he is on, you are doomed!
yes he hasn't lost whole year, actually make it last couple of years. He is extremely good player but unbeatable he is not. The dude lost a set against Humbert and Tiafoe