2:01 Is there ANY other game that does what Battlefield 1 does with their flamethrower? Just having the gas spit out before catching fire is such a great small detail!
@@nathangg8429 I think he's talking about how you can't load stripper clips on a sniper rifle because the scope is going to be on top of the receiver which will block the clips.
There's an actual reason for the guns to sound like that. Cod is in the esports is much more competitive tan bf if you put that loud sounds in competitive match it would be difficult to hear the commentarist of the game. I like both games btw so I really don't care.
Alexis Orellana lol how can you talk about followers when i bet you go to school everyday and you hear the debate of which game is better all your friends probably say overwatch and the cool kids say cod and you have to side with the cool kids so you think you achieved some popularity 😅👌 plus on top of that most of the cod games people just follow other people's gun class and everyone copys the same damn cod class build I've played bo3 multiplayer lol was fucking garbage 3 little kids running around with prestige master and all 3 of them with the VMP gun lol and ghost as one of their perks its a fucking joke how you can even try to call someone a follower when you yourself follow others as well at the end of the day not everyone follows in the crowd but the majority of the world does.
Technically one could modify the rifle by carving a new (or perhaps, from the factory simply manufacturing it to be so) clip guide at an angle. It would be much more difficult to push the rounds into the magazine however. Peter R. Senich's The German Sniper 1914 - 1945 , there is a picture of a Kar98k with the charger guide machined into the receiver about 45 degrees to the right of where it would be normally. The model was never put into full production however.
the graphics of bf1 shine because the game graphics SHINE and they SHINE in a way that leave you blind XD the graphics of cod are dead colours with grey and black because that was the feeling of the soldiers in the war, everything was black and grey, never shining :,v the BF1 was made to fun the players, to have a good time, while Cod WWII was made to make you feel like you are the soldier in the screen
WTF COD? You haven't even emptied the mag of the rilfe and you're reloading an entire clip of 5 rounds in there??? Also you gotta teach me how to used stripper clips when your scope is over the clip notch.
Xikun Gao That happens on BF1 every now and then but its only with a few guns. I’ll have one or two rounds left and a 5 round clip is inserted. I think its the Gewher 95 or Gewher 98 im not sure which one
STL3FIFA That’s not only for certain guns, but there’s a reason for it. Say you have a gun that has a 10 round magazine. You shoot 7 bullets. In BF1 you will only have 3 bullets left in the magazine. So your character, instead of reloading 7 bullets individually, will load 1 stripper clip (5 bullets) and 2 individual bullets. 5+2=7. 7+3=10. It makes perfect sense to do it like that cause it’s quicker. In COD if you have a 10 round magazine on a bolt action rifle, you shoot 7 bullets, they’ll reload 1 stripper clip (5 bullets) and you’ll be back at 10. Even if you shot all 10 bullets you will only load 5. Cause 5=10 simple math. Kek
PoeticWhisper yeah and it's because Cod are lazy fucks. If you have 1 bullet remaining you'll reload with a stripper clip with 5 bullets... But Battlefield has so many different reloading animations. For example the Repetierpistole m1912 if you fire 1 bullet your player will eject out 7 bullets and put in a stripper clip of 8. If you fire 3 bullets it will eject out 5 bullets.
I find it interesting how in cod he puts a stripper clip in with the scope directly over the bolt. Or how he loads ten rounds in the 10 shot lee Enfield with one five round stripper clip
Swiishy I agree with you on that one and tbh bf1 is generally more realistic but at least cod takes the pin out of the grenade instead of just throwing it
I mean yeah i thought it was badass but he actually hated it due to the fear of having the pin pull off to easily i mean he USED HIS THUMB he didn't even need no force to carry 30 kg in a bloody hand i mean for God's sake who makes a safety pins when it is so loosen between the nade and release clamp(sort of translated that from Turkish but whatever)
Totally agree. Springfield with scope just over the bolt can only be reloaded round per round. Same for the Lee Enfield later in the vid. COD make games mostly for money but don't pay attention to such small details.
@Ziad Khaled Wait, wut? How am I complaining? I just wanted to say how clips work in tandem with scopes. Besides, criticisms can lead to the game being good since the devs could fix something that's wrong or broken and most of them have the goal of making the game better. Though, a mistake in the reload animations wouldn't be the biggest problem in a game.
@Ziad Khaled Oh my bad. You @ me so I thought you directed it at me, my bad. I get how you feel but just try to ignore the toxicity. It is COD we're talking about and the community, in general, is not the friendliest. Besides, isn't MW2019 well-received? It's not perfect but from what I've heard, people liked it enough (never played it though). Now it's the opposite as BFV is getting bashed (for good reason) and CODMW2019 is getting decent praise (especially for Warzone).
@Ziad Khaled God, I wouldn't even know where to begin. If you're interested wtf happened, there are some videos about it. It's a shitshow of a game. It also split the community dramatically which is a shame. Not saying the game was pure crap; I had enjoyable moments but I'm not gonna deny how the game is full of problems. Also, the support for the game is over so RIP. Here's a general list of problems from reddit lol: www.reddit.com/r/BattlefieldV/comments/g6ov9m/if_youre_going_to_buy_bf6_dont_forget/
Special note about the Mosin Nagant in BF1. If you reload with one bullet left in the gun, the player model inserts a full stripper clip into the gun, but takes one bullet away and pockets it. Amazing attention to detail on that.
I am more of a Call Of Duty fan, but Battlefield 1 is much more realistic Edit: Okay, i mean the physics, sound designs and details with the word 'realistic' So now you know :)
Battlefield has nothing to do with realism..gameplay is exactly like COD just with vehicles. But battlefield does have better graphics, engine and sound design ^^
I really wanna give CoDWW2 a chance... Having played CoD since CoD2, WW2 is just a lazy piece of work and the little details that matters just flew over the developers heads but I'm all about offline & singleplayer and the campaign, (although generic in a lot of ways with few twists and turns) is the only thing keeping me hooked to the game
If you're referring to 3:41, there is a second row of 5 behind the 5 that you see. But yes I agree, putting a stripper clip into the gun with a top-mounted scope is pretty odd.
+DerOpa EA is actually the publisher and works more in line as a partner/investor. The production crew can leave EA and almost effectively create the same game under a different title and developer name. That's actually what happen with COD, the production crew abandoned EA and did things their own way.
I choose to prefer BF1 not because I think this COD is bad but because I think it gives a better experience when playing with friends and I don't think COD offers this. However without friends BF1 becomes gruelling and leaves the player without any way of impacting the game effectively and COD would be better in this situation. Just my opinion.
Have you played cod with friends?its way more fun than on battlefield,all my friends take bf way to serious but on cod it's all just casual yet it can still be competitive with ranked play or gbs
TacticalBacon i play both. Your sorry ass game always fails to not bore me. Left ww2 in a week and a half. Bo3 bored me to death aswell. The only game i played properly was bo2 and cod4. Bf always keeps me hooked on. Bf3 was one of the best games i played imo.
Comparing vehicles and comparing video games are very different. Cars will always change, video games will change, yes, but will always keep their style. so theres really no point in saying that one is better than the other if the other will always be the same. CoD and Bf aren’t supposed to be the same thus comparing them makes you look stupid. For example comparing Black Ops 2 to Black Ops 3 is logical because they’re both from the same developers. But if you want to compare CoD WW2 to Battlefield 1, it doesn’t make sense because they’re made by different developers. See my point?
PiggyOutlaw Video games change about as much as cars the only thing kept is the franchise name and the price of the game but mostly everything else changes just like how car companies have the same franchise name and have a basic standard price AKA sticker price
You're wrong, compare bf1 and cod ww2 is like compare a cow with a bird, this isn't the same gameplay i prefere bf1 for sure but i can't let you saying ww2 suck because it's not right. You pref bf1 and you don't like cod ww2, but if he is bad tell me why ww2 is the best seller cod they did since 7 years?
dude you don't even know what you're talking about, because if you compare them to real life sounding ww2 weapons it sounds like them but without all the loud sounding punch to it
Battlefield 1's overall weapon sound design is so on point. Every gun sounds really satisfying and the animation match the sound effect pretty much perfectly.
(IMO) BF1: More realism, better looking graphics, and better more "realistic" sounds. CODWW2: Nice graphics, a bit more of a Cod4 Animations, wierd clunky sounds. BF1 ofc wins.
Battlefield kinda pissed away a lot of potential realism by making automatic weapons as common as they are. I understand it from a gameplay perspective, but there were literally hundreds of designs of bolt action and single action rifles they could've distributed amongst the classes, in addition to their current state. As we have it there aren't a lot of the convenient design decisions from earlier BF games, like how vehicle spawning is complete trash now. The universal class weapons from earlier games made it so that you weren't limited to a set playstyle (E.g. a scout running cqc with a carbine or shotgun, or a medic with a DMR suppressing a sniper so he can revive a teammate) So you end up with six of one and a half dozen of the other.
The reloads are cheesy in Battlefield one and some animations are wacky. And they are not more hard hitting. The guns in Call of duty are since they actually don't use muzzle velocity like Battlefield. Battlefields muzzle velocities are several times slower than real life which makes it silly in combat and it's more like shooting a laser in star wars. (I play both games and enjoy both)
-can you really barehand the flammenwerfer? (i butchered that so hard, sorry) wouldn't that burn your hand too? -lets not talk about that incorrect non empty reload on CoD WWII bolt action rifles -and lets not talk about "HOW THE HELL ARE YOU SUPPOSE TO CARRY AN MG15 ANTI AIRCRAFT MACHINE GUN?" Edit: i gotta start settling this argument thingy once and for all. Open this website: imfdb.org, or just google "imfdb battlefield 1" and/or "imfdb cod ww2". It'll show you what's correct and what's incorrect on both games there. A friendly and often forgotten reminders: -you can like both games -it's somewhat useless comparing them -also, this random comment will drown in the comments section
CoD is way too fast-paced for loading individual bullets, and the bare-handed flamethrower is because it's a killstreak that any player can pull out, where BF1 has one specific class/character model that can use flamethrowers.
WW2 is ok. The gameplay, the fun, etc. It’s main downright is the inaccuracy of trying to be realistic and gun sounds BF1 is also ok, but its realism and sounds of the guns are very good
BF 1 has my side, COD WW2 is also pretty bad-ass and of course people will choose BF 1for looking more "colorful", COD WW2 is taking place in the fucking war, it's supposed to be all dark and shit. Both look great.
In battlefield 1 it is dark and gloomy have you even played it? It is all weathers after all just because its war does not mean the weather will always be dark and gloomy. Both are based on two different wars i hope you know that.
REBORN CENTRAL dude calm down it’s just a comment I think he meant that cod takes please in an area where darker colors are more common such as mud, dirt, rotting trees and ash
Nic Pennekamp Vlogs it's not based on which gun it is. It is based on the animation style and attention to detail, like how when reloading a rifle in BF1 the clip holding the rounds comes out after they're in the gun but in ww2 it stays in the rifle. Also some guns may be different but they're all similar, these wars were not very far apart so weaponry was not extremely more advanced and as you can see even some guns from the first world war made it into the second one. So It is nowhere based on the wars it is on which shows the soldier actually reloading the gun properly and how fast it is done as if it was in reality.
Nic Pennekamp Vlogs Plus nobody is fighting over what war it is in, they're fighting over graphics, gameplay, physics, game modes and play style it has nothing to do with the war so it's actually kinda funny you thought people were fighting over which war it was and who did which war better
Just to say comment is stupid and pointless and I was saying it’s funny how people fight over each game like it matters they are two different games set in two different time zones making graphics and sounds be totally different
Nic Pennekamp Vlogs By graphics I mean light, textures, and models not time period graphics and no sounds shouldn't be different for some guns that were in both wars because they didn't change the sound of a gun for the next war it stayed the same
@@sandrobendoni8010 I'll be having fun with my screaming spades and my magic 5 round stripper clips that somhow fit under a scope and only need one to reload a *TEN* round gun
ReactedClown136 In ww1 most American and European nations ordered new guns for nearly every battle due to some guns being unstable at the time, if no new guns were supplied the commander would occasionally order the soldier's to clean their gun as much as possible so that once the battle begins there was a less chance of the gun becoming jammed, giving the shiny look of a new gun (hence why you practically always spawn with a shiny weapon and when you do happen to run into some mud or a grenade blows up near you your gun turns dirty). In the mid 1930's they started re-using guns even if they did happen to be "battle scarred". This way saved countries plenty of money to help create new war weapons such as the nuclear bomb, this is also the reason cod ww2 looks "dirty" most of the time because of the amount of guns that were re-used. They are both pretty accurate for their timeline.
It was so ugly that everyone died I don't think that's what he meant. Some weapons especially medic rifles have zero texture on them giving a plastic look (not just shiny). There are some weapons that got so much loving when being designed. The Gewehr 98 looks fucking stunning but that clearly came at a cost of some of the other weapons in the game.
Some of the guns comparisons were showing two completely different guns. (BF1 MP18 and COD WWII MP28), (BF1 Gewehr 1898 and COD WWII Karabiner 1898/1935 revision), (BF1 1904 No.1 Mk.3 and COD WWII 1942 No.4 Mk.1*)
Still very much different rifles. The MP18 fired a much smaller cartridge and had a much slower rare of fire than the MP28. The Gewwhr 98 also varied completely in design, and was an internal box magazine rifle, where as the Karabiner 98k was an external fed system where the stripper clip had to be removed. The Kar98k was also shorter and lighter but much more accurate. And of course its very easy to tell the different between the No.1 Mk.3 enfield and the No.4 Mk.1 Enfield. though both stripper clip fed .303, they were completely different in design and the No.4 Mk.1 was incredibly more accurate. The Gewehr 98 and Kar98k would be about the only ones i could agree with being as close as possible.
no shit WW1: 1914-1918 WW2: 1939-1945 and no they did not use similar weapons WW1 was a war mostly fought using rifles While (depending on which country we're talking about) WW2 was a war mostly fought with rifles and submachine guns. Not to mention things like the first Automatic rifle, the STG 44 Besides there wasn't that much equipment from ww1 that saw extensive use during ww2. That doenst mean equipment from ww1 was NOT used at all... for example the mannlicher m1895 (the Austro-Hungarian rifle from 1895) saw some limited use... And not to mention pistols like the Luger p08 that saw extensive use by the german army.
Hubert Mrtvy But looks only get you so far. If we’re talk about about how pretty the game looks, Battlefield maybe. But if we’re talking about realism, COD is better.
Da Heat Doe Battlefield's level of realism? Really? Battlefield is more over the top than COD. Plus, the cinematography in Battlefield is colourful which isn't realistic, meanwhile COD is very gritty with washed-out colours, which is far more realistic.
Bo4 is trash imo The amount of microtransaction in that 60$ game is horrendous The lack of zombies content is just fk stupid And the Operation Grand heist is the perfect name for the reserves that you can buy from now on, activision was very awesome back in the old days but now are very greedy You can enjoy the game that's fine but this isn't my cod game tbf
Lietenant_ Dan8 i have shot many guns in my life and let me tell you that cod guns (at least the ones showed in this video) sound like fucking nerfs. I have never shot a ww1 or ww2 gun but cod guns sound so weak... it really looks like an airsoft. And dont hate on me, just saying my opinion based on my experience.
@@SnorpMan Not really? You can almost anything up in Battlefield games... And in BF1 You can drive with tank throught houses... And in COD Even nuclear explosion dont effect anything
CoD guns sound like powrful punch on the face. (Or just weak sound.) Bf1 guns sound really cool because bf1 using Echo guns sound & not weak. *just my opinion* *(No Drama reply at here)*
OWEN061 the clip that have the rounds is only to alinate the. Bullets tham is for a very fast introducing the 5 rounds but that not enter in the gun like the garand that stay out
I think i have a feeling that the striper when into the Kar98k in CoD WW2 because i'm not hearing any sound of the striper thats been thrown away. 1:14
![ЭВОЛЮЦИЯ Call of Duty [2003 - 2023]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Uqmt9-z5eqw/mqdefault.jpg)
2:01 Is there ANY other game that does what Battlefield 1 does with their flamethrower? Just having the gas spit out before catching fire is such a great small detail!
Howya Doin tf2
oskhamp I don't think so.
Shoopa Doopa I checked the gameplay and unfortunately no but that is a great Far Cry game.
ChemicalFX Too true!
Flame throwers don't do that in real life
Lee Enfield No.4, a 10 round rifle
*uses a 5 round clip to reload all 10 rounds*
What if it is a 10 round clip but 5 rounds are invisible?
We are all gonna glanced over the fact that in cod ww2 you use a clip to reload a sniper lol
@@nathangg8429 I think he's talking about how you can't load stripper clips on a sniper rifle because the scope is going to be on top of the receiver which will block the clips.
Ziad Khaled most snipers are bolt action rifles you donkey
5 rounds on both sides of the clip
BF1 Shovel: cling cling bam bam
CoD WW2 shovel: YAAAH YAAHHH
Orthodoxy Will Rise Again This comment is gold
Orthodoxy Will Rise Again cod sounds like east european porn
Алиреза no shit😂
That was the funniest part of the whole video! The WW2 guy looked and sounded like an idiot trying to hit that tree!
I do remember my melee training, the shovels screamed for hours
2:03 The guy in cod is holding the metal flamethrower with a bare hand. That outta hurt.
And still fanboys compare COD Over BF
Does the gas get ignited after it has left the barrel? Although barrel could heat up from the flame but that's all
@@kristofer1004 shut up man
@@Mazda2620 Damn looks like i triggered somebody
@@Frosty_V0 When tf did i said BF V was best? Yes it worst game in battlefield series so far
Pretty sure they just go in a room and bang some shit on a table to record the COD guns.
Lmao
Now that I think about it, they do sound like someone banging on a table. xD
Bet they uses the finest maple tree to and steel to craft the best table and a sledgehammer. There's 10 grands of sounds for the Kar
XD
Haters from battlefield are here again...
Damn bf1 guns sound fucking amazing that echo ripping through the atmosphere just wish the matches didn't take so long to load into
iGotTheMojoBaby For real tho.
*Joins matchmaking on BF1*
*Finds Server*
"Time to take a shower, make a sandwitch and watch a TV show"
Dell Conagher and the same thing over again when you try to leave the server
COD’s sounds, sounds like every gun has a suppressor equipped.
He edited it u can tell
True, arent guns loud
+Daniel Venegas NO THERE SILENT.
Even the grenades
Why Do i live? it sure does
BF1, without a doubt.
Better sounds, cleaner animations, looked new and refreshing, better at almost every way.
Only in your opinion
The better. The graphics on objects are worser
@@sebru i can objectically say thy graphics are better
@@maxmavh3132 yes, you might think so, but i am not a cod fanboy
i am a modern warfare fankid because of the good stuff
@@sebru even worse
battlefield 1 gun sounds: BOOM BOOM BOOM
cod ww2 gun sounds: put tut tut put put
There's an actual reason for the guns to sound like that. Cod is in the esports is much more competitive tan bf if you put that loud sounds in competitive match it would be difficult to hear the commentarist of the game.
I like both games btw so I really don't care.
copper guardian I like both of the games too, I was just saying that the cod ww2 sounds are weak.
blex bond my dad did but lol k
Not Daily Bryan. Your dad did what?
Not Daily Bryan. Oh nevermind
Press F to pay respects.
Pay respect to which game?
BLU Rider Not battlefield I'll tell you that haha!!!
Well I did pay respect to treyarchs cod world at war
Cricis11700 press F to print money
Cricis11700 F
Battlefield 1: (actual gun sound)
COD WW2: (fart noise)
Fart noise heard from a hundred miles away
When you melee in COD WW2 it sounds like your guy is trying to poop
So true.
Bf1 the best!
Corris Nhuck bf sucks
mgaspar25 good to know u are a noob
mgaspar25 true
mgaspar25 At least I'm not a 12 year old...
Alexis Orellana lol how can you talk about followers when i bet you go to school everyday and you hear the debate of which game is better all your friends probably say overwatch and the cool kids say cod and you have to side with the cool kids so you think you achieved some popularity 😅👌 plus on top of that most of the cod games people just follow other people's gun class and everyone copys the same damn cod class build I've played bo3 multiplayer lol was fucking garbage 3 little kids running around with prestige master and all 3 of them with the VMP gun lol and ghost as one of their perks its a fucking joke how you can even try to call someone a follower when you yourself follow others as well at the end of the day not everyone follows in the crowd but the majority of the world does.
Once again, Battlefield has sounds, cod has noises
Still a Piece of garbage no not true
Tbh the sounds in Cod ww2 are still trash
Still a Piece of garbage COD's sounds are "Still a Piece of garbage".
Alex [ClashRoyale&GD] ayyyyye lmao
Alex [ClashRoyale&GD] yeah
2:57 how TF are you gonna put ammo with that big ass scope. For COD
It's_ HELL lol ikr, he loads the gun with a stripper clip FROM THE SIDE... that doesn’t work like that. Round by round with a sight on that rifle
Technically one could modify the rifle by carving a new (or perhaps, from the factory simply manufacturing it to be so) clip guide at an angle. It would be much more difficult to push the rounds into the magazine however. Peter R. Senich's The German Sniper 1914 - 1945 , there is a picture of a Kar98k with the charger guide machined into the receiver about 45 degrees to the right of where it would be normally. The model was never put into full production however.
Maybe since it was produced with the scope the feed clip chamber is slanted slightly?
They fucked up on both the smle and the springfield
Ninja of Ni9ht yeah
3:08 the Springfield's reloads pisses me of always the cod ww2 one
Not just the Springfield , every single sniper in cod ww2 is like that
Yeah I agree the fact the scope is blocking access for a stripper clip to be inserted which is why it’s reloaded with single rounds.
BF1 next to WW2 really makes BF's graphics shine
the graphics of bf1 shine because the game graphics SHINE and they SHINE in a way that leave you blind XD
the graphics of cod are dead colours with grey and black because that was the feeling of the soldiers in the war, everything was black and grey, never shining :,v
the BF1 was made to fun the players, to have a good time, while Cod WWII was made to make you feel like you are the soldier in the screen
Monzer Jaouhari everything is right but except the complete opposite
imparable 71 lol that was a good one but i disagree in the colors
Monzer Jaouhari I hope you are joking...
+Maria Ramirez no that's what the cod junkies are saying to each other to justify another let down
WTF COD? You haven't even emptied the mag of the rilfe and you're reloading an entire clip of 5 rounds in there???
Also you gotta teach me how to used stripper clips when your scope is over the clip notch.
Xikun Gao That happens on BF1 every now and then but its only with a few guns. I’ll have one or two rounds left and a 5 round clip is inserted. I think its the Gewher 95 or Gewher 98 im not sure which one
STL3FIFA the Gewehr 95 rejected the block magazine and then you load a new clip in. (sry for bad grammar)
STL3FIFA That’s not only for certain guns, but there’s a reason for it. Say you have a gun that has a 10 round magazine. You shoot 7 bullets. In BF1 you will only have 3 bullets left in the magazine. So your character, instead of reloading 7 bullets individually, will load 1 stripper clip (5 bullets) and 2 individual bullets. 5+2=7. 7+3=10. It makes perfect sense to do it like that cause it’s quicker. In COD if you have a 10 round magazine on a bolt action rifle, you shoot 7 bullets, they’ll reload 1 stripper clip (5 bullets) and you’ll be back at 10. Even if you shot all 10 bullets you will only load 5. Cause 5=10 simple math. Kek
PoeticWhisper yeah and it's because Cod are lazy fucks. If you have 1 bullet remaining you'll reload with a stripper clip with 5 bullets... But Battlefield has so many different reloading animations. For example the Repetierpistole m1912 if you fire 1 bullet your player will eject out 7 bullets and put in a stripper clip of 8. If you fire 3 bullets it will eject out 5 bullets.
STL3FIFA you're lying. Its in the code that when you don"t have an empty clip you'll reload with single rounds
I like how the CoD WW2 sniper shot 4 rounds but still loads a 5 round strip mag but Battlefield takes the W on sniper reload
I find it interesting how in cod he puts a stripper clip in with the scope directly over the bolt. Or how he loads ten rounds in the 10 shot lee Enfield with one five round stripper clip
Or how the guy hold the flamethrower wisis bare hands without burning himself
Swiishy I agree with you on that one and tbh bf1 is generally more realistic but at least cod takes the pin out of the grenade instead of just throwing it
Skadzer you can easily pull the pin with the thumb my father and his friends showed me that when I was a kid back in his days in the military
I mean yeah i thought it was badass but he actually hated it due to the fear of having the pin pull off to easily i mean he USED HIS THUMB he didn't even need no force to carry 30 kg in a bloody hand i mean for God's sake who makes a safety pins when it is so loosen between the nade and release clamp(sort of translated that from Turkish but whatever)
3:08 you can’t load a stripper clip with a scope like that in WW2
Totally agree. Springfield with scope just over the bolt can only be reloaded round per round. Same for the Lee Enfield later in the vid. COD make games mostly for money but don't pay attention to such small details.
@Ziad Khaled There isn't any space though when the scope is mounted above the receiver as the scope would block the stripper clip.
@Ziad Khaled Wait, wut? How am I complaining? I just wanted to say how clips work in tandem with scopes. Besides, criticisms can lead to the game being good since the devs could fix something that's wrong or broken and most of them have the goal of making the game better. Though, a mistake in the reload animations wouldn't be the biggest problem in a game.
@Ziad Khaled Oh my bad. You @ me so I thought you directed it at me, my bad. I get how you feel but just try to ignore the toxicity. It is COD we're talking about and the community, in general, is not the friendliest. Besides, isn't MW2019 well-received? It's not perfect but from what I've heard, people liked it enough (never played it though). Now it's the opposite as BFV is getting bashed (for good reason) and CODMW2019 is getting decent praise (especially for Warzone).
@Ziad Khaled God, I wouldn't even know where to begin. If you're interested wtf happened, there are some videos about it. It's a shitshow of a game. It also split the community dramatically which is a shame.
Not saying the game was pure crap; I had enjoyable moments but I'm not gonna deny how the game is full of problems. Also, the support for the game is over so RIP.
Here's a general list of problems from reddit lol: www.reddit.com/r/BattlefieldV/comments/g6ov9m/if_youre_going_to_buy_bf6_dont_forget/
Special note about the Mosin Nagant in BF1. If you reload with one bullet left in the gun, the player model inserts a full stripper clip into the gun, but takes one bullet away and pockets it.
Amazing attention to detail on that.
R.I.P truck
R.I.P sky
BF overall best.
The graphics is not all :D
No but the animations are better too.
bfgguns yea
Capitan Benjamas LOL TAKE THAT
In bf u can reload faster and play with out some rager leaving and crashing the lobby bf is better 🖕u cod battlefields coming through 😎😎😎
0:55 sounded amazing with booth sounds combined
I am more of a Call Of Duty fan, but Battlefield 1 is much more realistic
Edit: Okay, i mean the physics, sound designs and details with the word 'realistic'
So now you know :)
Xamora Kaltofen talking realistic in game
and guns sounds are realistic
Battlefield has nothing to do with realism..gameplay is exactly like COD just with vehicles. But battlefield does have better graphics, engine and sound design ^^
TheFormActually yup. I agree with that
i hate to say this bf1 so much beter than mw2 im call of duty fan but that the truth
Cod ww2 look kinda rushed
Don't dare ye cod fanboys come raging
KALEEP
It’s okay, we can agree WW2 was a rushed but kinda FUN mess.
Im a fan of the old games of cod
JasDavINK who isint
CoDWW2 didn't have black German soldiers.
I really wanna give CoDWW2 a chance... Having played CoD since CoD2, WW2 is just a lazy piece of work and the little details that matters just flew over the developers heads but I'm all about offline & singleplayer and the campaign, (although generic in a lot of ways with few twists and turns) is the only thing keeping me hooked to the game
You forgot the BAR silly billy.
True
silly billy XD classic
Brodus8899 probably doesnt have level up to get bar
The first time I went on Battlefield 1, I shot an smg just to get a feel for the controls. The sound nearly broke my eardrums and I loved it.
It's like they used staplers to make the gun sounds in COD
Jaime Moyano oh just stfu
TheOrdinaryBritishLadWithADecentScottishAccent SEETHING
Jaime Moyano what kind of staplers you have? Mine is loud tho, like you could hear it 10 meters away
On the sniper it sounds like a staple gun and then keys shaking lmao
Jaime Moyano They are HORRIBEL but not that horrible
Anyone notice how if you have 7 bullets left it a clip loaded weapon that holds 10 bullets your guy just smashes another 5 bullets in
whoweis that's cod for ya
whoweis yeah thats a thing in AAA games nowadays
whoweis cod is great at math
DaKat0 quick maths
Ninja'd Yanjad ?? Joke right?
The Battlefield 1 sounds are way more beefy than the Cod ww2 sounds in my opinion.
except the nades where cod wins, the sound of explosions in cod is much better
Niishta bf1 does have more realistic sounds and more... so i like cod and bf but bf wins for me
It’s because they didn’t turn up the volume because I know they’re not that quiet.
Enfield kind of sound supressed.
I like the bf1 flamethrower sounds better, it has that terrifying 'scream' to it.
3:08 cod ww2 logic
Poor Truck
Laur_ Wolf_XD rofl
Laur_ Wolf_XD lmao
Laur_ Wolf_XD lmao
Laur_ Wolf_XD you sir, should get an award
Vincent Pedroso Thanks Mr.!
puts a 5 bullet STRIPPER MAGAZINE into a rifle with a MOUNTED SCOPE on top and gets 10 bullets. COD LOGIC
Stripper *clip
If you're referring to 3:41, there is a second row of 5 behind the 5 that you see. But yes I agree, putting a stripper clip into the gun with a top-mounted scope is pretty odd.
Cod is fun to play
Munks slow the video down, there's clearly only 5 rounds being loaded.
I hate the scoped clip fed rifles in cod ww2. You can't load a stripper clip in at a 45 degree angle!
In call of duty you can....
Ain't gonna lie been a call of duty fan sense the big red one and finest hour but battlefield are better
A really cool username BF1 does that too...
What's This? No the scopes are to the left, I still wish the scopes were normal and you could only load 1 at a time.
DeadlyBreath9790 Ooh... I was confused by his comment. I thought that it's impossible to reload in a 45 degree angle x3
I like that the M1 Garand has the “ting” sound.
Why wouldn't it? It's not like BF1 has an M1 garand, it's WW1!
Hahahaha such a dumbass hes right there is no m1 garand in ww1!😂😂🤣😂🤣🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
bf1 20/10
Stop
Battlefield has much more accurate Reloads and Sounds than CoD... so BF wins
Roblox 50000/10
yFODA-SE oia só um br aq tbm
Poor maths hahahahah
Medal of Honor was the father of both these games.
And now ea owns medal of honour and battlefield
ea been owning medal of honor there the creators of the title
American history was the father of these games, fr you guys really like putting games on a pedestal, but they all copied off of actual events
+DerOpa
EA is actually the publisher and works more in line as a partner/investor. The production crew can leave EA and almost effectively create the same game under a different title and developer name. That's actually what happen with COD, the production crew abandoned EA and did things their own way.
Because it’s older? Okay, lmao. Must admit a good story but that game is a shithole that people only rave over because it’s nostalgic to them.
I choose to prefer BF1 not because I think this COD is bad but because I think it gives a better experience when playing with friends and I don't think COD offers this. However without friends BF1 becomes gruelling and leaves the player without any way of impacting the game effectively and COD would be better in this situation. Just my opinion.
Ezekiel Carr one of the best answers imo
Have you played cod with friends?its way more fun than on battlefield,all my friends take bf way to serious but on cod it's all just casual yet it can still be competitive with ranked play or gbs
TacticalBacon i play both. Your sorry ass game always fails to not bore me. Left ww2 in a week and a half. Bo3 bored me to death aswell. The only game i played properly was bo2 and cod4. Bf always keeps me hooked on. Bf3 was one of the best games i played imo.
Battlefield 1: BOOM,BOOM,BOOOOOOOOOM!!!
Call Of Duty WWII: pew,pew,pew...
Guys CoD and Bf will always be different. CoD is always gonna be more of an arcade while Bf will be more realistic. That’s just how it is
PiggyOutlaw And we all have the right to compare them to one another.
PiggyOutlaw People compare cars and trucks even though they are different so how does a video game style change that?
Comparing vehicles and comparing video games are very different. Cars will always change, video games will change, yes, but will always keep their style. so theres really no point in saying that one is better than the other if the other will always be the same. CoD and Bf aren’t supposed to be the same thus comparing them makes you look stupid. For example comparing Black Ops 2 to Black Ops 3 is logical because they’re both from the same developers. But if you want to compare CoD WW2 to Battlefield 1, it doesn’t make sense because they’re made by different developers. See my point?
PiggyOutlaw Video games change about as much as cars the only thing kept is the franchise name and the price of the game but mostly everything else changes just like how car companies have the same franchise name and have a basic standard price AKA sticker price
realistic.... cs:go is closet one
both bf1 and cod are casul shoter (my opinion)
This vid is satisfying
UnsafeWinter 50 iî
UnsafeWinter 50 j
This video proves that COD is the garbage compared to BF1
You're wrong, compare bf1 and cod ww2 is like compare a cow with a bird, this isn't the same gameplay i prefere bf1 for sure but i can't let you saying ww2 suck because it's not right. You pref bf1 and you don't like cod ww2, but if he is bad tell me why ww2 is the best seller cod they did since 7 years?
I prefer cod not bf1
I like the animations on both sides but CoD WW2 sounds are just trash and don't sound like guns at all.
FN Fallout yeah the game is good but i think they flopped on the sounds, trying to make them sound "deafening".
Gagego I meant there’s RUclips. He can just look it up...
Gagego I'm pretty sure that they don't sound like bb/airsoft guns :/
Gagego dumbassssss it’s 2017
dude you don't even know what you're talking about, because if you compare them to real life sounding ww2 weapons it sounds like them but without all the loud sounding punch to it
Battlefield 1's overall weapon sound design is so on point. Every gun sounds really satisfying and the animation match the sound effect pretty much perfectly.
(IMO) BF1: More realism, better looking graphics, and better more "realistic" sounds.
CODWW2: Nice graphics, a bit more of a Cod4 Animations, wierd clunky sounds.
BF1 ofc wins.
Battlefield kinda pissed away a lot of potential realism by making automatic weapons as common as they are. I understand it from a gameplay perspective, but there were literally hundreds of designs of bolt action and single action rifles they could've distributed amongst the classes, in addition to their current state.
As we have it there aren't a lot of the convenient design decisions from earlier BF games, like how vehicle spawning is complete trash now. The universal class weapons from earlier games made it so that you weren't limited to a set playstyle (E.g. a scout running cqc with a carbine or shotgun, or a medic with a DMR suppressing a sniper so he can revive a teammate)
So you end up with six of one and a half dozen of the other.
Blackwood Security the automatic weapons in BF1 are just to make it more fast. And btw those guns were prototypes in WW1
Epsilon that’s so retarded just because graphics are better doesn’t mean that they are better
Then what is "Spencer TheBoy"
SpencerTheBoy I mean battlefield is better and play them both frequently
10 years and COD's guns still sound like cap guns.
RHINOCELOT | Fuck you mean? He has one subscriber.
Battlefield 1 win
oner uzziel fuck you all of the guns in BF1 sound the exact fucking same
Creeper Army Uhm... no. In WW2 they all sound the same.
well, i guess that BF1's sounds are not the same.
Not with the shotguns
Really?
3:28 these quickscopes tho
imma stay loyal to bf1...
Same
its cris I have bf 1 but I'm still going to try out cod ww2
Krytical 1 yea i actually agree with you on that...
its cris I hate BF1
TheOrdinaryBritishLadWithADecentScottishAccent cool no one asked
I think battlefield 1's animations are more realistic, it's not as stiff as Call of Duty's also Battlefield's sound design is amazing
GRocket1020 i think bf sounds better because the probably recorded real gun sounds
I cringe when I see the cod dude reloading with stripper clips with the scope on top of the loading gate
fireblazz i cringe when i see know it alls like u cringing over the dumbest and smallest things
Subaru Impreza WRX STI Spec.C Type RA-R. I cringe when I see a smart ass worried about spelling over the internet.
Subaru Impreza WRX STI Spec.C Type RA-R. I cringe when I find out people cringe.
Subaru Impreza WRX STI Spec.C Type RA-R. That's the joke
Subaru Impreza WRX STI Spec.C Type RA-R. I'm stuck in an endless loop of cringee.
batlefield better
No
@@koensko lmaoo
No es pug
Найс рофл
Battlefield sucks
We all can clearly agree that bf1 won. Just look at them tree graphics at 4:30 😏👌
ThugWolf GS
Up close in cod looks like cod 2
ThugWolf GS they were comparing reload animation tho...not graphics
but why tree thou 😅😂
YAAAHHHHH...... YYIIIIIAAAAAHHHHH......
ThugWolf GS ᒍᑌᔕT ᑕᗩᑌᔕE ᗷᖴ1 ᕼᗩᔕ ᗷETTEᖇ GᖇᗩᑭᕼIᑕᔕ does not mean bf1 is better it depends on the game play
Battlefield guns more hard hitting and realistic
And battlefield has better reloads
The reloads are cheesy in Battlefield one and some animations are wacky. And they are not more hard hitting. The guns in Call of duty are since they actually don't use muzzle velocity like Battlefield. Battlefields muzzle velocities are several times slower than real life which makes it silly in combat and it's more like shooting a laser in star wars. (I play both games and enjoy both)
Douglass MacArthur *Bad Company 2*
a pelican Bad Company two had a WAY faster muzzle velocity.
Douglass MacArthur I think what they mean is that it has a better sound to it, it sounfs more like a gun that would do damage.
-can you really barehand the flammenwerfer? (i butchered that so hard, sorry) wouldn't that burn your hand too?
-lets not talk about that incorrect non empty reload on CoD WWII bolt action rifles
-and lets not talk about "HOW THE HELL ARE YOU SUPPOSE TO CARRY AN MG15 ANTI AIRCRAFT MACHINE GUN?"
Edit: i gotta start settling this argument thingy once and for all. Open this website: imfdb.org, or just google "imfdb battlefield 1" and/or "imfdb cod ww2". It'll show you what's correct and what's incorrect on both games there.
A friendly and often forgotten reminders:
-you can like both games
-it's somewhat useless comparing them
-also, this random comment will drown in the comments section
Rizkiradi Alam MG 15 Aircraft machine gun was reverse engineered to be used by infantry because it wasn’t practical in planes.
Just say 'flamethrower' if you're worried about spelling...
CoD is way too fast-paced for loading individual bullets, and the bare-handed flamethrower is because it's a killstreak that any player can pull out, where BF1 has one specific class/character model that can use flamethrowers.
i may have misread a few things on some books, but weren't they used on stationary positions?
Rizkiradi Alam Unmounted MG15s were used very late in the war and were very rare, but they still were a thing
Verdun may be a ww1 game but it has an ally Battlefield 1
In COD at 3:42 puts in 1 five round clip into the gun and it shows 10 rounds
Lukas Lindae it was stacked weird
Lukas Lindae yeah they fucked up there and the Springfield
there a fucking scope on that rifle, how did he even put the clip in
yooHoo Lagger the scope is a bit to the side they did that so it's easier so look through the scope
yooHoo Lagger Enfield scopes were places on the side of the rifle. Springfield scopes however...
Regarding the comments: I love to see how the Battlefield community advanced to what the Cod community was always accused of.
Same , lol
René Lechner wait, please explain?
Maybe, but as of now, BF1 is on the winning side
Anzack mostly opinions
The Lighting in call of duty is really bad
So is the balancing
E1iSm1th he make cod ww 2 is bad... HE MAKE! !!
Dzionsełka He... make?
Emanuel Martinez nice name
Mmmmmm yes, is good name
Battlefield 1 Gun Sounds: BOOM BOOM BOOM
Call Of Duty WW2 gun sounds: Put Dut Dut Put
Battlefield will always be better in realism.
BF 1 10/10
Mhh
Why a u namming dual engine german fighters in a video like this?
I really like ww2 but battle feild 1 definitely won
The graphics of ww2 is really bad. I give ww2 0/10 bf 10/10
曹晟哲 ;)
I think b1 is better
Wu Chen me to but i like CoF ww2 becuase im got it on my ps4
Wu Chen yea
šimun master do u know how to English?
Jose James im from croatia
šimun master we just had presentation on that country in the class today
Obviously bf1 beats cod
Bf is better than cod in general
You all say cod because your all those cod kiddies then rage everytime they die lol get good
Well fuck you then.
Ur high
@Central Intelligence Agency fuck you too.
@@stormdesertstrike
You cannot fight legions alone.
@@pizzerinoitaliano3049 Don't worry. I can deal with this kids.
The reload of the m1903 in COD makes no sense, if the scope is above the chamber you cannot put the ammo clip inside it
GPCDLM Just push the clip through the scope, duh.
Nelson Mandela Lol
BF 1 %%%
These developers should start working with each other and create a masterpiece
Potato Gamung this is the only resoneble comment so far
Bf did the same thing
Hey some poeple prefer cod and others prefer battlefield i personely prefer cod but if you prefer battlefield i wont care
Every bf is a reskin of the other c mon and you dont have much customization
yea Hussein
Bf1 💯💯💯💯
D/Bodybag G40 hhhhgh
D/Bodybag G40 Lol 100
Lol no if you know anything about guns you know bf1 lost
Kejsarn haha go cry about cod somewhere else
D/Bodybag G40 both games have super unrealistic gun noises.....
WW2 is ok. The gameplay, the fun, etc. It’s main downright is the inaccuracy of trying to be realistic and gun sounds
BF1 is also ok, but its realism and sounds of the guns are very good
BF 1 has my side, COD WW2 is also pretty bad-ass and of course people will choose BF 1for looking more "colorful", COD WW2 is taking place in the fucking war, it's supposed to be all dark and shit. Both look great.
DR. FUN TIMES you obviously know nothing. WW1 was also a war
In battlefield 1 it is dark and gloomy have you even played it? It is all weathers after all just because its war does not mean the weather will always be dark and gloomy. Both are based on two different wars i hope you know that.
REBORN CENTRAL dude calm down it’s just a comment I think he meant that cod takes please in an area where darker colors are more common such as mud, dirt, rotting trees and ash
Bf1 takes place in a war too... WW1
Caleb Hagen I wasnt even angry mate, but WW1 was darker than WW2. Depends what front you look at though
I'M A COD FAN AND BATTLEFIELD LOOKS BETTER, EVEN THO I COULDNT GET INTO BF...
JODY REAL we do not deserve your kind in this comments section...
Codww2 its better
Dewing you ruined the neutral territory
WOW YOU SURE LIKE CAPS LOCK DONT YA
COD DOES LOOK CARTOONISH THO...I THINK IM ABOUT TO START BUYING BATTLEFIELD AGAIN AND JUST PLAY BOTH...
Bf 1 have better sounds
BassMan Boosted way way much better than cod
Os Top But is sounds really what makes a game optimal?
BF win, graphics, sounds and reloads
Even Super Mario Odyssey has better weapon sounds than call of duty
wdym pokemon has them crisp reload sounds Mario is dumb Pokémon is the only way to go
alex williams AGREED!
I just don't get how you compare those games
TheAverageWolf Gaming Memes my friend... *MeMes*
"THEN"
Bruh the reload with the rifles that have the the scopes on them in cod throws the immursion right out the window 😂😂😂
emboltic the fuck plays cod to be "immersed"?
+RedMedsRedemption There's a difference between immersion and sticking a clip right through a rifle scope lmao
Cod- "what is realism"
There is no realism in any game whatsoever. Although, some things may be more authentic than others. In this case, BF is more authentic than CoD.
Mike Tyson try ArmA
It’s funny how people fight on what is better even though one is WW1 and the other is WW2 they are different wars
Nic Pennekamp Vlogs it's not based on which gun it is. It is based on the animation style and attention to detail, like how when reloading a rifle in BF1 the clip holding the rounds comes out after they're in the gun but in ww2 it stays in the rifle. Also some guns may be different but they're all similar, these wars were not very far apart so weaponry was not extremely more advanced and as you can see even some guns from the first world war made it into the second one. So It is nowhere based on the wars it is on which shows the soldier actually reloading the gun properly and how fast it is done as if it was in reality.
Nic Pennekamp Vlogs Plus nobody is fighting over what war it is in, they're fighting over graphics, gameplay, physics, game modes and play style it has nothing to do with the war so it's actually kinda funny you thought people were fighting over which war it was and who did which war better
Just to say comment is stupid and pointless and I was saying it’s funny how people fight over each game like it matters they are two different games set in two different time zones making graphics and sounds be totally different
Nic Pennekamp Vlogs By graphics I mean light, textures, and models not time period graphics and no sounds shouldn't be different for some guns that were in both wars because they didn't change the sound of a gun for the next war it stayed the same
BF1:As realistic as possible
COD WW2:What’s realism
A game is for FUN
@@sandrobendoni8010 I'll be having fun with my screaming spades and my magic 5 round stripper clips that somhow fit under a scope and only need one to reload a *TEN* round gun
You can see gas right before the bf1 flamethrower
Levi Hix its líquid not gas. :)
cristrek1 its a oil that sticks to the target for maximum effectiveness
Napalm?
Pashico Nah, just fuel
Napalm is a mixture of some chemical and fuel, like gasoline. I'm pretty sure they used it in 1942 onward in flamethrowers and bombs.
Cod ww2 has left the match
Ww2 is not even close to battlefield 1 graphics wise...
Pintexx lol bf1 looks plastic af
ReactedClown136 In ww1 most American and European nations ordered new guns for nearly every battle due to some guns being unstable at the time, if no new guns were supplied the commander would occasionally order the soldier's to clean their gun as much as possible so that once the battle begins there was a less chance of the gun becoming jammed, giving the shiny look of a new gun (hence why you practically always spawn with a shiny weapon and when you do happen to run into some mud or a grenade blows up near you your gun turns dirty). In the mid 1930's they started re-using guns even if they did happen to be "battle scarred". This way saved countries plenty of money to help create new war weapons such as the nuclear bomb, this is also the reason cod ww2 looks "dirty" most of the time because of the amount of guns that were re-used. They are both pretty accurate for their timeline.
It was so ugly that everyone died I don't think that's what he meant. Some weapons especially medic rifles have zero texture on them giving a plastic look (not just shiny). There are some weapons that got so much loving when being designed. The Gewehr 98 looks fucking stunning but that clearly came at a cost of some of the other weapons in the game.
ReactedClown136 LOL
I know, it's kinda like everything got smeared with poop. It's so dark and shitty looking
BF1 NICE!!!
Dice*
@@elis4192 it's a joke :^
No
0:12 Yes CoD, I knew it. That animation again.
GrabthePistol yeah it just magically goes foward by itself.
DarkSideZEKE actually he flips the switch to the slide with his thumb, it didn't go forward by itself.
The ol' CoD4 USP 45 reload from 2007
this is the only reload i'll ever see attached to the 1911. no other reload animation suffices.
Battlefield has sound cod has noises!
No, cod has toy gun noises.
Both game has sounds dumbass
RIP Car
Car, Car...
a small detail i love about battlefield 1 is that it doesnt break the immersion by showing a red reload on the middle of your screen
Some of the guns comparisons were showing two completely different guns. (BF1 MP18 and COD WWII MP28), (BF1 Gewehr 1898 and COD WWII Karabiner 1898/1935 revision), (BF1 1904 No.1 Mk.3 and COD WWII 1942 No.4 Mk.1*)
Its the closest comparison they could get too
Still very much different rifles. The MP18 fired a much smaller cartridge and had a much slower rare of fire than the MP28. The Gewwhr 98 also varied completely in design, and was an internal box magazine rifle, where as the Karabiner 98k was an external fed system where the stripper clip had to be removed. The Kar98k was also shorter and lighter but much more accurate. And of course its very easy to tell the different between the No.1 Mk.3 enfield and the No.4 Mk.1 Enfield. though both stripper clip fed .303, they were completely different in design and the No.4 Mk.1 was incredibly more accurate. The Gewehr 98 and Kar98k would be about the only ones i could agree with being as close as possible.
WW2 looks like a 360 game
no more like ps2 game
@@alijah000 Hey don't humilate PS2 its more like those free to play mobile games.
@@khaledalassad7697 i dobt mean ps2 is bad im just saying the graphics are ehh
Remember battlefield 1 is in ww1 and ww2 is years later
SirBoocester what are you trying to say
Kit Fisto fistet kleine Kinder could be a sequel to each other
SirBoocester they used a lot of the same weapons, or very similar ones.
Irtaza Azam you act like bf invented those weapons
no shit
WW1: 1914-1918
WW2: 1939-1945
and no they did not use similar weapons
WW1 was a war mostly fought using rifles
While (depending on which country we're talking about) WW2 was a war mostly fought with rifles and submachine guns.
Not to mention things like the first Automatic rifle, the STG 44
Besides there wasn't that much equipment from ww1 that saw extensive use during ww2.
That doenst mean equipment from ww1 was NOT used at all...
for example the mannlicher m1895 (the Austro-Hungarian rifle from 1895) saw some limited use...
And not to mention pistols like the Luger p08 that saw extensive use by the german army.
Nothing brings the Battlefield fans together like these type of videos.
Battlefield looks and sounds better...
ne
its becuz cod has settings
Hubert Mrtvy But looks only get you so far. If we’re talk about about how pretty the game looks, Battlefield maybe. But if we’re talking about realism, COD is better.
Cathal Carson Realism and Cod are two opposite things dude, you can't compare battlefield's level of realism with cod's, and i play both games
Da Heat Doe Battlefield's level of realism? Really? Battlefield is more over the top than COD. Plus, the cinematography in Battlefield is colourful which isn't realistic, meanwhile COD is very gritty with washed-out colours, which is far more realistic.
If treyarch made cod ww2 the fun sounds will be a bit deep the zombies will be different and better and also the multiplayer will be better
Like bo4 right
Bo4 is trash imo
The amount of microtransaction in that 60$ game is horrendous
The lack of zombies content is just fk stupid
And the Operation Grand heist is the perfect name for the reserves that you can buy from now on, activision was very awesome back in the old days but now are very greedy
You can enjoy the game that's fine but this isn't my cod game tbf
If cod was made by dice it would be generally better
It's still lacking compared to Battlefield 1.
BF1→real gun.
CODWW2→gbb airsoft gun.
Assault jack a r e u a k I d d o?
Assault jack I bet you've never heard a real life gun shot in your life and RUclips doesn't count
"real gun" real funny
Lietenant_ Dan8 i have shot many guns in my life and let me tell you that cod guns (at least the ones showed in this video) sound like fucking nerfs. I have never shot a ww1 or ww2 gun but cod guns sound so weak... it really looks like an airsoft. And dont hate on me, just saying my opinion based on my experience.
Illuminati Banana it's a game bro chill it's for children
Battlefield 1 has destructible terrain. 2:17
no really XD
@@SnorpMan ya
@@SnorpMan well it's better than COD WWII's destructive terrain, oh wait 😂
@@SnorpMan Not really? You can almost anything up in Battlefield games... And in BF1 You can drive with tank throught houses... And in COD Even nuclear explosion dont effect anything
CoD guns sound like powrful punch on the face. (Or just weak sound.)
Bf1 guns sound really cool because bf1 using Echo guns sound & not weak.
*just my opinion*
*(No Drama reply at here)*
Nattaphong Thukplueang nigga your name sounds like as if someone's puking
lol WEEEEEEEEEABOOOOOOOO ALERT
U watch anime...YUCK
thats not anime lol (heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeentaiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii) XD
Nattaphong Thukplueang *makes valid argument* immediately gets insulted for no reason, welcome to the shit show when cod is involved
1:05 WHERE DID THAT STRIPPER CLIP GO,THE ROUNDS JUST TELEPORTED INTO THE GUN
UntrueWalrus yeah. You didn't know that's how guns work?
OWEN061 the clip that have the rounds is only to alinate the. Bullets tham is for a very fast introducing the 5 rounds but that not enter in the gun like the garand that stay out
Abraham Leon yeah I know, was just a joke
Back in 43 we didn't need human functions. We had reflexes as fast as the speed of sound.
lol it's a glitch
Day of Infamy vs Call of Duty WWII
THIS IS A FCKIN............relax.....this is a reload comparison...NOT A FCKIN GRAPHIC COMPARISON
Monzer Jaouhari what?
Now that’s just not fair.
Monzer Jaouhari tf u talking about?
Men
I love Cod ww2
but i love BF1 more..
Samudra Goswami fuk yuo
@@alcatalalcatal6175 errr..wrong spellings..
Me too
@@alcatalalcatal6175 hes totally right bf way better
BF1
Bf1= both fucking 1
increasing contrast does not makes your game real
it just makes it more coooooool
Stop shooting both at the same time
Melo DEC I know right! In that way you can’t hear the gun sounds
ikr
Melo DEC - Make him you worthless piece of shit.
Auro Mori Mine - I can tho ;)
It is comparison of reload animations
I think i have a feeling that the striper when into the Kar98k in CoD WW2 because i'm not hearing any sound of the striper thats been thrown away. 1:14
Kancil Buruk ya it does in cod the stripper goes in like an m1 grand