I was born in America in 1961, and somehow managed to survive the birthing process with my whole body. I love being intact, and have had no problems. I've saved several little boys from being tortured by educating expectant mothers.
Circumcision is not a big deal. It helps prevent infections and diseases and problems that the foreskin causes. It's much easier for males to keep it clean when it is circumcised. Circumcision doesn't reduce sexual pleasure since men don't have that much sexual pleasure to begin with.
@@cks7548 Every year, here in the United States, hundreds of babies lose part of the head of their penis, some lose bigger portions of their penis, & some even lose part or all of their scrotal sac & testicle(s). About 40,000 to 60,000 infant boys require neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) care each year in the United states because their penis was circumcised. The biggest reasons are bleeding from circumcision & infection from circumcision. In cases with bleeding, the docs will say something like, "Nothing to worry too much about. He lost a little blood during the circumcision, & in order to give him replacement blood, he had to be admitted to NICU. He should only need to be in NICU for a day or two." Depending on the facility, NICU coasts from about $12,000 to $48,000 per day, & often entails 1 on 1 care around the clock. Babies are only admitted to NICU when they are at serious risk of death. It only takes about an ounce or 2 blood loss for infants, who are just a few days old, to bleed to death. Penis circumcision is the most significant reason SIDS is higher among American male babies than it is among females & males whose penises were not circumcised. Infant penis circumcision is more than a "big deal." Infant penis circumcision is sinister predatory medical practice.
This is a powerful video! I'm thankful I chose not to circumcize my son. His dad wanted to and practically begged me to have him circumcized. I absolutely refused. That's not my decision to make. It's my son's, when he's old enough to decide. All the points y'all made were legit. I'm not Jewish and it's weird that this country is one of the only ones that regularly circumsize when most countries don't.
Fox Who Lost His Tail, but worse because Stockholm Syndrome exacerbates the cognitive dissonance. I know because I went through it myself. Both of my teen sons are intact.
Circumcision reduces the risk of urinary tract infections, penile cancer, sexual transmission diseases, and other infections and diseases. And it completely removes the risk of phimosis (tight foreskin problems). My mother knew a man who wasn't circumcised, and he got penile cancer and died as a result. My sister-in-law works as a nurse, and she often has to deal with old men who aren't circumcised, and they have urinating problems as a result. A lot of times, the old men can't urinate as a result. My older sister also works at a hospital, and she told me a mother take her son in who had a severe urinary tract infection because he wasn't circumcised.
@@cks7548 During medical clinical rotations, I was privy to lots of infant penis circumcision nightmares & would never recommend infant penis circumcision. All the baby boys turn blue with distress & pain for extended durations well after the procedure is completed, & hypoxic cyanosis is never safe for developing infant brain & nervous system, not even for a few minutes. Males have a greater risk of bilateral & unilateral testicular cancer & breast cancer than they do of penis cancer. Penis cancer is less prevalent in cultures that do not circumcise penises than in those that do, & these include Japan, all of Scandinavia, most of Europe, & much of South America. These populations also have less prevalence of sexually transmitted diseases than the United States, including HIV. In the United States, most cases of penis cancer occur in males with circumcised penises. Penis cancer occurs more commonly in heavy smokers & those who do not clean themselves for durations of months, whether or not their penis is circumcised, & males who get their penis circumcised after sexual maturation, & their circumcision is tightly stitched, in which case the cancer initiates at the circumcision stitch scars. Phimosis is a rare condition that seems to only be a significant problem in pro penis circumcision cultures, most notably the United States. In cultures where foreskin has not been stigmatized, phimosis is treated with cream & movement, or stretching & is not the inflated problem that American culture promotes. The strongest medical evidence is empirical data & information within & between populations & subpopulations. Published medical or scientific study reports are weak compared to empirical data & information because empirical data represents what is actually occurring in populations, while study reports are proposed conclusions & speculations bases on samples that may or may not be representative of populations. Males with intact penises endure far less urinary tract infections (UTIs) than female babies, & medical research studies that claim infant penis circumcision reduces UTIs are usually published by biased proponents, & often medical practitioners cause infections in intact baby penises because they attempt to retract the attached foreskin & iatrogenically induce injury & infection. Foreskin of infants & boys should never be attempted to retract because at these ages, foreskin is physically attached to the glans head all the way up to the urethral meatus the same way skin is attached to other body parts. Last, even the published studies show that it takes more than 2 hundred infant penis circumcisions to prevent 1 UTI that could be easily treated with antibiotic medication.
I was not born in the US but moved here when I was 16 straight to High School, it was the worst time of my life. I am now 43 and uncircumcised my whole life. Circumcision is cultural choice (mainly in the US) because only about 40% of men are circumcised in this world. I did get some bullying and teasing in high school swimming locker rooms because mine looked different. But my parents educated me very well at an early age in this topic so I was able to answer everyone's questions with a calm and educated manner rather than being offended or taking the bullying. (parents, bullying for this does happen in American schools so prepare your kids from an early age) As far as functioning, uncircumcised functions the same as circumcised, better in most cases. When I was little and started experiencing the detachment of skin on its own, I talked to my parents and they explained to me how it slowly comes off and to keep it clean. By the age of 17, my skin detached completely, it was sore and bled for a little but nothing bad. It healed in about a week. I never had a problem with cleaning or infections. My son is also not circumcised and we all function normally. Also remember, no matter who you call as your God, we were not designed to chop off what was put in place. "Remember that you're perfect, God makes no mistakes" (Bon Jovi lyrics).
Circumcision is not a big deal. Circumcision doesn't cause any problems, and it has a lot of benefits. It should be the parent's decision whether or not if their child gets circumcised. There are parents who have their baby's ears get pierced, and most people are ok with that.
Kudos to Nathan for speaking proudly and frankly about HIS BODY = HIS DECISION [and ridiculous "locker room talk" that RARELY occurs]. A circ’d penis is, by definition, “altered”… As an Intact someone who grew up in a large city during the 60’s and 70’s, as well as having played sports and served in the military, I can attest that penises were NOT the topic of discussion in the locker room [unless someone had "botched" circumcisions, horrible scars, penile skin-bridges/adhesions, curvatures, etc.], and NOT about those with foreskin (which is the true natural penis). Must look like the father?? Emigrant males, not being Jewish or Muslim, are mostly Intact. Emigrant males DO father babies in the U.S.; if the child is male, the mother is usually bullied into having her son circumcised based on propaganda and prejudices. The “Must look like the father...” response is actually/usually conveyed by the MOTHER; studies have shown that once circ’d fathers are given objective information about foreskin and circumcision, they tend to OPPOSE circumcision for their sons, nephews and friends’ sons going forward! Nearly half of males circ'd as infants or adolescents ARE expressing their objections in different ways; the remaining circ'd males just accede to using erectile assistive/maintenance devices and/or using pharmaceuticals such as Viagra/Cialis. The majority of circ’d guys “restoring” are in that predicament because someone unnecessarily altered their penis to begin with. In your lifetime, thousands of infant boys have not survived the procedure and hundreds of thousands of boys suffered botched circumcisions (40% of whom have committed suicide). Okay, so you want/ed to play roulette with your son's life and penis; however, you cannot guarantee that he will be happy with that decision which you did not allow him to consent to. www.researchgate.net/publication/367351178_Adverse_Childhood_Experiences_Dysfunctional_Households_and_Circumcision www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-5998771/Circumcising-newborn-boys-increases-risk-cot-death-stress-procedure.html Next, even within circ'd families, there is little chance that one's penis IS going to resemble another's [due to the many varied circumcisers, their skill or lack thereof, the circ method used and the damages resulting from]. The common damages of circumcision (i.e., skin-bridges, horrible or misaligned circumcision scars [offsetting the Raphe], twisting/curving in any direction, early onset of E.D., etc.) have become "normalized" over the years -- and your son may resent you. Most late adolescent teens and men who undergo [circumcision at birth] develop a feeling of anger and shame and resentment in having that circumcision done. They often feel like they've lost their bodily autonomy and they are misunderstood very frequently by both society and medical professionals. Consider that HE might alienate YOU [and other pro-circ'ers] from HIS children (your grandchildren) in later years. doctorsopposingcircumcision.org jewishcircumcision.org
I regret now that I had my son circumcised. At the time, I didn't give it too much thought and my wife and I never really had a conversation about it. It was just assumed, because I was circumcised, and mostly everyone we knew was circumcised, that our son would be also. I just wish I had the insight then in my 20's that I have now in my 50's. My son has never complained about it, but I hope if he has a son, he gives it more thought than me and his mother did.
Mothers or fathers should ensure boys can retract their foreskin and wash themselves there. It protects the sensitive head and the type of skin of the glans doesn't dry out and loose sensitivity.
Male circumcision and female circumcision are not similar at all. Female circumcision is a lot worse than male circumcision and doesn't have any benefits like how male circumcision does. Male circumcision doesn't really remove much, while female circumcision removes a lot. Males still have rights over their bodies, while females are having their bodily rights taken away.
Male circumcision does have benefits. Male circumcision reduces the risk of urinary tract infections, penile cancer, sexual transmission diseases, and other infections and diseases. And it completely removes the risk of phimosis (tight foreskin problems). It's easier for males to be circumcised as infants than it is later on in their life.
If the rate of circumcision is dropping in the US, there will eventually be more intact fathers than mutilated fathers. Will the pro-mutilators still use the argument "to look like his father"? It is a stupid argument.
Circumcision is not a big deal. Circumcision doesn't cause any problems, and it has a lot of benefits. It should be the parent's decision whether or not if their child gets circumcised. There are parents who have their baby's ears get pierced, and most people are ok with that.
I am still intact I find it absurd that fathers want your sons to look like them to cut off a piece of healthy skin this should be abolished all around the world because people don't know that 100 babies die a year from getting this obscene unnecessary surgery and without their consent yes I've had minor problems with foreskin but it's been taken of parents do you research before you do anything to a baby boy
A lot more than 100 baby boys die each year, just in the United States, but the cause of death gets misappropriated to SIDS. That's why SIDS is higher among infant boys whose penises get cut than it is among females & males whose penises don't get cut.
I made the mistake of circumcising my son and told him so. I apologized to him for not having the knowledge and maturity I have now when he was born. I, myself am a proud intact male. My father was, and his father before him...I confessed my ignorance on the subject, that he might make a different choice with his son. It really is an unnecessary surgery. Thank you both for sharing your thoughts on this subject...
Thank you so much for this!! I don’t feel strange at my pride over having my foreskin! For example, I was made fun of A LOT in school bathrooms over my foreskin, & now I work in daycare, so any time I see an intact boy, my heart swells with pride!!
I m from India and I m not cut ..👍. As u mention there is no issue abt hygiene..👍. God gave you that for reason , he knows what he is doing … let’s not play with his creation… 🙏
My Penis Is Circumcised Since 2 Days Baby Just After Birth..... Circumcised Penis Is Best Appearance..... In My Country Many Boys Are Circumcised So It Is Not An Issue.
I think that is a good argument. My friend Kyra was indifferent about circumcising her boy but her circumcised boyfriend insisted on it. So their penises would look the same. There is a sauna in my building and I use it often. I love using it and thus would use it with my son. So I would get him circumcised, so our penises match. I guess many guys do not see their dad's penises often but the sauna is a factor.
Thank you for sharing. Personally I'm against the practice when "just because" But done for religious beliefs it is a whole different discussion. When you are perfectly happy with being circumcised, that's all that matters, but the difference between done "well" and not is very important. The opposite of circumcised is intact.
@@kenwalker687 you wont do anything to your son. You will let him make his own choices. Otherwise expect that he can sue you and you will have to pay the costs of restoration also.
There's much evidence that this trauma actually changes the way the brain is "formatted". It's quite baffling how such a vile and barbaric practise continues unquestioned in the US, in light of present-day understanding of the harm. I think anyone considering it ought to watch a few videos of the "procedure" (I prefer the term mutilation, as that's what it is) before making their minds up. Perhaps read a few accounts of the many adult Americans who deeply regret that their parents did this to their penis.
You should let your son make the decision if he wants to mutilate his body. In my opinion, this procedure should be banned. Just do a quick google search and look at the benefits of having a foreskin.
@@kenwalker687I find it ironic that pro multilaters when circumcision is in the talk are like “oh it will only hurt a lil very little pain no bleeding” but when they get resistance “oh it’ll be so painful it’ll hurt so bad, your gonna struggle and it’s gonna be excruciating” Stop talking about it like said person is gonna get circumcised later.
G'day from Melbourne, Australia... thanks for a refreshing & informative discussion on the topic. I am a 50yo owner of a 'uncut' penis, I am grateful for how having the foreskin intact for masturbation, I've never had any issues with cleanlyness & a number sexual partners commented the comfort factor (gliding in/out of the vagina), along with handjobs being easier for females to perform. The choice getting circumcised, should not be influenced by doctors or decided by parents... the decision should upto the 'owner' of the penis, once they are 16+. "Vote #1 for keeping the penis hoodie!"
I was born in 1965 in Canada and I'm intact just like my dad. I recently asked him about that decision. He simply said we weren't Jewish so that's why we didn't choose to cut. Back then the docs didn't put on the pressure like today to get baby boys cut.
The risk of being permanently disfigured is pretty much 100%, this is not female circumcision! If a ftaher wants his son to look like him then he should alter his own body to look like his son. A cut man could resort to 4skin restoration, a father with a son with a big mothers mark get a tatoo etc. There is actually a case of the latter. Do mother's who have a scar after an episiotomy want their daughters to be cut to look like them? It is not a twosided issue where one side is as good as the other and arguments can be mirrored, no harmful cultural practice is. So no, boys who are cut, are not made fun of in the locker room since this is a feature of cutting cultures where the bodyshaming of the normal body is a means to enforce the social norm. The absence of a harmful cultural practice is not a social norm to be enforced, but simply for what it is and having part of your body amputated is not something to be made fun of.
It seems crazy to permanently alter a child based on the possible scenario the son asks why his penis doesn't look like his dad's. How often does this come up and couldn't you have a 2 minute conversation explaining why? I had a childhood friend who married a man who had part of his arm amputated. Would you remove the same part of a child's arm so they would 'look like dad'?
@@emmas4336 Not just crazy but barbaric. Imagine in the very distant past when we were all Africans, two neighbouring tribes, one in the north and one in the south, who had fought off and on for generations over som strategic spiritual ground in the east. The northern tribe used a symbolic sideways outstretched left arm pointing in the direction of the ground whenever they encountered members of the southern tribe. After each periodic battle and peace treaty, irrespective of whether it had led to an exchange of control of the disputed ground, the tribes exchanged each others' captive warriors. One of the southern warriors experienced an unusual wound where a small part of his arm had been lost which meant he couldn't fully stretch his arm out sideways but otherwise was fully functional. A generation passed and there was a new battle over the disputed ground concluided with a new treaty. This time the southern chief got the idea that before making the time old exchange of captives he would have all the captives subjected to this unusual injury on their left arm so that they would be unable to make their arm gesture. The returning northern warriors felt hugely humiliated by this and together with their chief decided this required a change in their traditions. The returning warriors told how they had been incredibly brave bearing the ill treatment meted out to them at the hands of their enemy and showed the scar in their arm as proof. The scar became a badge of distinction showing one was a real warrior and young warrior initiatives were eager to demonstrate the same bravery as their fathers, to be like them. So the infliction of this injury became part of the initiation rites for new warriors. The symbolic outstretched arm gesticulation was abandoned in favour of pointing at the scar in a show of defiance. So yes, it is possible to imagine a situation where parents remove a part of a child's arm so they would 'look like dad'. In most of the modern world though we have come to value all the normal bodyparts of a natural body and Dads with amputations would prefer that they have a prosthesis if necessary to look like their normal son.
There aren’t any parents who have publicly stated that they are glad their kid was circumcised. There aren’t any parents who regret leaving their kid intact. There are many many parents and plenty of them Jewish who have publicly stated that having allowed the circumcision was the biggest regret of their entire life there’s absolutely nothing else they wish they could go back and undo more. And no one regrets having not done the circumcision
@@kenwalker687 have you ever heard a parent say they are glad their kid was circumcised? Just type into RUclips “mom regrets circumcision” there are mountains of them
I just read a story of a lady she said when her son was born a few hours later the nurses asked her if she wanted him circumsized she said “duh” she said she heard her son screaming at the top of his lungs from down the hall but she doesn’t care because he’s going to thank her when he gets a bj at 13.
Guys DONT do it, u will regret it. I was cut as an adult 4 years ago, ruined my s*x life, destroyed sensitivity and pleasure, thats literally all it did. Lost the joy of intimacy, dont desire it anymore its more of a chore now, i hate the dr that convinced me to do it, and said it would not change the feeling LIES
When I was younger I thought the extra for skin was because your privates will get bigger and bigger once you’re older and the skin will stretch out perfectly to its size, and now that I’m older I see that 😅🐴
I talked my friend out of it and it didn’t even take that long most guys just wanna do it because they were circumcised themselves .. in my friends case he said oh it’s not clean mind u he was only uncircumcised for a few days in his life so I had to share my own personal story and yea 13 years later his boy is strong with no infections or nothing
USA is the only country where a majority oare routinely circumcised when they are newborns. Most (but not all) Israelis are circumcised, but for religious reasons. Circumcision is the norm in South Korea, but the procedure is carried out when a boy is between his 10th and 16th birthdays. Many times I was the only guy in the locker room/showers with foreskin. I was never ridiculed, because by age 9-10, I discovered that retraction made my penis look circumcised. My foreskin is the reason why I surrendered my virginity almost 20 years after graduating from high school.
Circumcising is very important for health reasons! Medical research says that circumcision can decrease the risk of: human papillomavirus (HPV) genital herpes simplex trichomoniasis mycoplasma syphilis chancroid Get circumcised!
My book below discusses circumcision from a UK perspective. In the UK only 20% of males are circumcised. This in itself can cause foreskin dysphoria, leading circumcised men to regrow their foreskin, which is possible. Read the book to find out how this is done.
It is still difficult to accept that the decisision to multilate someones genitals is taken so lightly and as if it is just normal. Cirtcumcision is not a medical procedure, it is mutilation, period. Why is it so difficult for doctors and parents to see this.
1 Corinth. 7.19 Circumcision is nothing, and uncircumcision is nothing, but the keeping of the commandments of God [is something]. Matthew 22:36-37,39 Master, which is the great commandment in the law? Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
Would you debate another dad, who is circumcised, who is in favour for his son? Do you think either of you might change your mind? Or each see another perspective?
with the answers he's given, about bodily autonomy and not getting an elective unnecessary surgery for a poor little baby, I can't see how he'd change his mind. anyone who'd argue otherwise has the burden of proof to prove why it's better than leaving everything intact as we were made to be
@@hllymchll Baby boys who are not circumcised face a 10-fold higher risk for urinary tract infection (UTI) in their first year than boys who are circumcised and a 23% increased risk of UTI through their lifetimes. Baby boys who are not circumcised face a 10-fold higher risk for urinary tract infection (UTI) in their first year than boys who are circumcised and a 23% increased risk of UTI through their lifetimes. The findings are from a meta-analysis of 22 studies that examined the single risk factor of lack of circumcision for occurrence of UTI. Researchers determined the prevalence and relative risk of UTI for boys aged younger than 1 year, 1 to 16 years, and older than 16 years and from this data calculated lifetime prevalence. They found the likelihood of UTI between birth and 1 year to be 9.91 times higher in uncircumcised boys compared with those who were circumcised; 6.56 higher for uncircumcised boys aged 1 to 16 years; and 3.41 higher for uncircumcised boys aged 16 and older compared with circumcised men. Urinary tract infections include infections of the kidneys, bladder, ureter, and urethra and are more common in the first year of life. Adverse effects can include kidney scarring, fever, pain, and septicemia. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has stated that circumcision can reduce the risks for UTI, HIV and other sexually transmitted infections, and penile cancer, and that the health benefits outweigh the risk of complications from the procedure. However, AAP leaves the decision whether to circumcise up to the parents of the child. Morris BJ, Wiswell TE. Circumcision and lifetime risk of urinary tract infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol. 2012. Epub ahead of print.
@@cks7548 There's nothing wrong as long as it is with the owner's informed consent otherwise it is a gross violation of their dignity. Circumcision does not reduce the risk of UTIs but increases it. Take a look at the data in the Global Health Data Exchange (A US organisation and so not exactly biased against the ritual). The estimnated risk of a US male neonate dying of a UTI in the fist week of life is almost 50 times what it is here in Denmark. The purported health benefits are all myths perpetuated by cutting communities. PS it doesn't cure epilepsy either.
Easy peasy: "Earth Mothers" like nature, and that encompasses the human body's natural state. There is no sound reason to fillet and skin an infant's penis. They also prefer keeping things simple, and avoiding unnecessary modern things which do not promote holistic health for their families. I hope this helps you to better understand. An earth mum wouldn't have her son's toes and ears removed for similarly false "hygiene" reasons either!
The default position of every living creature is anti circumcision. It's only ever performed due to immense pressure from tribal chiefs raised in flesh cutting cultures. These cultures are in the minority, thankfully.
Glad iam circumcised,when 33 it resolved all intimate problems at a cut! Too easy to generalised re this intimate subject....each to there own circumcised /uncircumcised,not lost any sensation at all.
Never knew circumcision was a thing. My wife belongs to a muslim family and her parents wanted me to be circumcised. I was told every boy in their family has to go through this. A barber or hajjam was called to do it which is very common in rural India and it is celebrated like a ritual with friends and family.i was sitting on a stool surrounded by people and my legs wide open. Few were even holding my legs tightly and one covered my eyes I could feel the barber pulling my foreskin and checking the glans , he clamped the excess skin with something and chopped it with a blade. Everybody clapped and congratulated me as I was finally ready for marriage.
My Penis Is Circumcised Since 2 Days Baby Just After Birth..... Circumcised Penis Is Best Appearance..... In My Country Many Boys Are Circumcised So It Is Not An Issue.
Circumcision destroy sex pleasure and sensitivity because foreskin has thousand of nerve tissue. If you are already circumcised you can regrow or restore your foreskin manually or foreskin restoration device. Clean pnis during bath, after urination and sex to prevent the risk of any problem. Use condoms to protect HIV and STD. Phimosis is not a disease to worry about unless there is any irritation, infection of the foreskin. Any irritation, infection, urinary tract infection is solve by medicine. Many people live with phimosis and enjoy sex life. Paraphimosis may go away on its own or solve by gently pressure the swelling foreskin and pulling it forward. Doctor may suggest circumcision because of their bloody money business. But do not circumcision. Clean pnis during bath, after urination and sex to prevent the risk of any problem.
I’m wondering how you came to the decision that it was ok to have a doctor remove a perfectly healthy part of your son’s body, altering him forever without his consent?
Circumcise the baby! If there is one chance in a million of him needing it as an adult, it is better to get it over with. Some adults get circumcised and it costs thousands and takes weeks to recover. Also, circumcision prevents many problems and makes cleaning easier. For me, it would also be that I am circumcised and want our penises to look alike.
First of all, the "health benefits" have virtually been disproven. Cleanliness is only an issue if you don't bathe (which it seems like most cut guys don't bathe properly). If circumcision was so great, it wouldn't need to be forced onto infants. The vast majority of intact men don't get cut. Also, over 100 baby boys die every year from circumcision. And presumably even more have botched circumcisions. There's a reason more and more people are deciding not to force a cosmetic surgery onto infants.
That’s totally wrong. Circumcision is unnecessary and it’s wrong. The chances of dying from circumcision at a young age is higher than an intact boy ever needing one later. It’s better to leave all baby boys intact throughout the world and then let them decide.
![Lil Uzi Vert - Chill Bae [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/D7F42F_JM3U/mqdefault.jpg)
I was born in America in 1961, and somehow managed to survive the birthing process with my whole body. I love being intact, and have had no problems. I've saved several little boys from being tortured by educating expectant mothers.
Circumcision is for muslims and Jews how is it common in USA?
@@nigamanandabehera8870 It's all about MONEY. Unnecessarily circumcising a newborn in American earns the medical system between 500 and 800 dollars.
@@nigamanandabehera8870because the guy who invented corn flakes promoted it as a way of preventing masturbation.
Circumcision is not a big deal. It helps prevent infections and diseases and problems that the foreskin causes. It's much easier for males to keep it clean when it is circumcised.
Circumcision doesn't reduce sexual pleasure since men don't have that much sexual pleasure to begin with.
@@cks7548 Every year, here in the United States, hundreds of babies lose part of the head of their penis, some lose bigger portions of their penis, & some even lose part or all of their scrotal sac & testicle(s). About 40,000 to 60,000 infant boys require neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) care each year in the United states because their penis was circumcised. The biggest reasons are bleeding from circumcision & infection from circumcision. In cases with bleeding, the docs will say something like, "Nothing to worry too much about. He lost a little blood during the circumcision, & in order to give him replacement blood, he had to be admitted to NICU. He should only need to be in NICU for a day or two."
Depending on the facility, NICU coasts from about $12,000 to $48,000 per day, & often entails 1 on 1 care around the clock. Babies are only admitted to NICU when they are at serious risk of death. It only takes about an ounce or 2 blood loss for infants, who are just a few days old, to bleed to death. Penis circumcision is the most significant reason SIDS is higher among American male babies than it is among females & males whose penises were not circumcised. Infant penis circumcision is more than a "big deal." Infant penis circumcision is sinister predatory medical practice.
This is a powerful video! I'm thankful I chose not to circumcize my son. His dad wanted to and practically begged me to have him circumcized. I absolutely refused. That's not my decision to make. It's my son's, when he's old enough to decide. All the points y'all made were legit. I'm not Jewish and it's weird that this country is one of the only ones that regularly circumsize when most countries don't.
Is his Dad? I am circumcised and if I have a son I will want his penis to look like mine.
Thank you for spreading awareness. no men will have it done as adults fyi unless that one in 1 million problem that might occur.
Fox Who Lost His Tail, but worse because Stockholm Syndrome exacerbates the cognitive dissonance. I know because I went through it myself. Both of my teen sons are intact.
Circumcision reduces the risk of urinary tract infections, penile cancer, sexual transmission diseases, and other infections and diseases. And it completely removes the risk of phimosis (tight foreskin problems).
My mother knew a man who wasn't circumcised, and he got penile cancer and died as a result.
My sister-in-law works as a nurse, and she often has to deal with old men who aren't circumcised, and they have urinating problems as a result. A lot of times, the old men can't urinate as a result.
My older sister also works at a hospital, and she told me a mother take her son in who had a severe urinary tract infection because he wasn't circumcised.
@@cks7548 During medical clinical rotations, I was privy to lots of infant penis circumcision nightmares & would never recommend infant penis circumcision. All the baby boys turn blue with distress & pain for extended durations well after the procedure is completed, & hypoxic cyanosis is never safe for developing infant brain & nervous system, not even for a few minutes.
Males have a greater risk of bilateral & unilateral testicular cancer & breast cancer than they do of penis cancer. Penis cancer is less prevalent in cultures that do not circumcise penises than in those that do, & these include Japan, all of Scandinavia, most of Europe, & much of South America. These populations also have less prevalence of sexually transmitted diseases than the United States, including HIV. In the United States, most cases of penis cancer occur in males with circumcised penises. Penis cancer occurs more commonly in heavy smokers & those who do not clean themselves for durations of months, whether or not their penis is circumcised, & males who get their penis circumcised after sexual maturation, & their circumcision is tightly stitched, in which case the cancer initiates at the circumcision stitch scars.
Phimosis is a rare condition that seems to only be a significant problem in pro penis circumcision cultures, most notably the United States. In cultures where foreskin has not been stigmatized, phimosis is treated with cream & movement, or stretching & is not the inflated problem that American culture promotes.
The strongest medical evidence is empirical data & information within & between populations & subpopulations. Published medical or scientific study reports are weak compared to empirical data & information because empirical data represents what is actually occurring in populations, while study reports are proposed conclusions & speculations bases on samples that may or may not be representative of populations.
Males with intact penises endure far less urinary tract infections (UTIs) than female babies, & medical research studies that claim infant penis circumcision reduces UTIs are usually published by biased proponents, & often medical practitioners cause infections in intact baby penises because they attempt to retract the attached foreskin & iatrogenically induce injury & infection. Foreskin of infants & boys should never be attempted to retract because at these ages, foreskin is physically attached to the glans head all the way up to the urethral meatus the same way skin is attached to other body parts. Last, even the published studies show that it takes more than 2 hundred infant penis circumcisions to prevent 1 UTI that could be easily treated with antibiotic medication.
Extremely grateful my husband and I were on the same page on this topic before we had our son ❤️
Right? Could you imagine taking a razor blade to your kids genitals
I was not born in the US but moved here when I was 16 straight to High School, it was the worst time of my life. I am now 43 and uncircumcised my whole life. Circumcision is cultural choice (mainly in the US) because only about 40% of men are circumcised in this world. I did get some bullying and teasing in high school swimming locker rooms because mine looked different. But my parents educated me very well at an early age in this topic so I was able to answer everyone's questions with a calm and educated manner rather than being offended or taking the bullying. (parents, bullying for this does happen in American schools so prepare your kids from an early age)
As far as functioning, uncircumcised functions the same as circumcised, better in most cases. When I was little and started experiencing the detachment of skin on its own, I talked to my parents and they explained to me how it slowly comes off and to keep it clean. By the age of 17, my skin detached completely, it was sore and bled for a little but nothing bad. It healed in about a week. I never had a problem with cleaning or infections. My son is also not circumcised and we all function normally.
Also remember, no matter who you call as your God, we were not designed to chop off what was put in place. "Remember that you're perfect, God makes no mistakes" (Bon Jovi lyrics).
Its good to see America slowly going in the right direction on this topic.
Circumcision is not a big deal. Circumcision doesn't cause any problems, and it has a lot of benefits. It should be the parent's decision whether or not if their child gets circumcised. There are parents who have their baby's ears get pierced, and most people are ok with that.
Kudos to Nathan for speaking proudly and frankly about HIS BODY = HIS DECISION [and ridiculous "locker room talk" that RARELY occurs]. A circ’d penis is, by definition, “altered”… As an Intact someone who grew up in a large city during the 60’s and 70’s, as well as having played sports and served in the military, I can attest that penises were NOT the topic of discussion in the locker room [unless someone had "botched" circumcisions, horrible scars, penile skin-bridges/adhesions, curvatures, etc.], and NOT about those with foreskin (which is the true natural penis).
Must look like the father?? Emigrant males, not being Jewish or Muslim, are mostly Intact. Emigrant males DO father babies in the U.S.; if the child is male, the mother is usually bullied into having her son circumcised based on propaganda and prejudices. The “Must look like the father...” response is actually/usually conveyed by the MOTHER; studies have shown that once circ’d fathers are given objective information about foreskin and circumcision, they tend to OPPOSE circumcision for their sons, nephews and friends’ sons going forward!
Nearly half of males circ'd as infants or adolescents ARE expressing their objections in different ways; the remaining circ'd males just accede to using erectile assistive/maintenance devices and/or using pharmaceuticals such as Viagra/Cialis. The majority of circ’d guys “restoring” are in that predicament because someone unnecessarily altered their penis to begin with.
In your lifetime, thousands of infant boys have not survived the procedure and hundreds of thousands of boys suffered botched circumcisions (40% of whom have committed suicide). Okay, so you want/ed to play roulette with your son's life and penis; however, you cannot guarantee that he will be happy with that decision which you did not allow him to consent to.
www.researchgate.net/publication/367351178_Adverse_Childhood_Experiences_Dysfunctional_Households_and_Circumcision
www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-5998771/Circumcising-newborn-boys-increases-risk-cot-death-stress-procedure.html
Next, even within circ'd families, there is little chance that one's penis IS going to resemble another's [due to the many varied circumcisers, their skill or lack thereof, the circ method used and the damages resulting from]. The common damages of circumcision (i.e., skin-bridges, horrible or misaligned circumcision scars [offsetting the Raphe], twisting/curving in any direction, early onset of E.D., etc.) have become "normalized" over the years -- and your son may resent you.
Most late adolescent teens and men who undergo [circumcision at birth] develop a feeling of anger and shame and resentment in having that circumcision done. They often feel like they've lost their bodily autonomy and they are misunderstood very frequently by both society and medical professionals. Consider that HE might alienate YOU [and other pro-circ'ers] from HIS children (your grandchildren) in later years.
doctorsopposingcircumcision.org
jewishcircumcision.org
I regret now that I had my son circumcised. At the time, I didn't give it too much thought and my wife and I never really had a conversation about it. It was just assumed, because I was circumcised, and mostly everyone we knew was circumcised, that our son would be also. I just wish I had the insight then in my 20's that I have now in my 50's. My son has never complained about it, but I hope if he has a son, he gives it more thought than me and his mother did.
Exact. Circumcision should never be necessary.
Boys are born perfect.
Mothers or fathers should ensure boys can retract their foreskin and wash themselves there. It protects the sensitive head and the type of skin of the glans doesn't dry out and loose sensitivity.
Why would you cut your baby boy. He'll never be the same. Might be violent too. When u experience that pain at such a young age it scars you FOREVER
I'm against female circumcision, but I'm not against male circumcision.
Male circumcision and female circumcision are not similar at all. Female circumcision is a lot worse than male circumcision and doesn't have any benefits like how male circumcision does. Male circumcision doesn't really remove much, while female circumcision removes a lot. Males still have rights over their bodies, while females are having their bodily rights taken away.
Male circumcision does have benefits. Male circumcision reduces the risk of urinary tract infections, penile cancer, sexual transmission diseases, and other infections and diseases. And it completely removes the risk of phimosis (tight foreskin problems). It's easier for males to be circumcised as infants than it is later on in their life.
If the rate of circumcision is dropping in the US, there will eventually be more intact fathers than mutilated fathers. Will the pro-mutilators still use the argument "to look like his father"? It is a stupid argument.
LOL - Yes, they will still use that rationale; there will always be deniers. 🤦♂
Circumcision is not a big deal. Circumcision doesn't cause any problems, and it has a lot of benefits. It should be the parent's decision whether or not if their child gets circumcised. There are parents who have their baby's ears get pierced, and most people are ok with that.
I am still intact I find it absurd that fathers want your sons to look like them to cut off a piece of healthy skin this should be abolished all around the world because people don't know that 100 babies die a year from getting this obscene unnecessary surgery and without their consent yes I've had minor problems with foreskin but it's been taken of parents do you research before you do anything to a baby boy
A lot more than 100 baby boys die each year, just in the United States, but the cause of death gets misappropriated to SIDS. That's why SIDS is higher among infant boys whose penises get cut than it is among females & males whose penises don't get cut.
I made the mistake of circumcising my son and told him so. I apologized to him for not having the knowledge and maturity I have now when he was born. I, myself am a proud intact male. My father was, and his father before him...I confessed my ignorance on the subject, that he might make a different choice with his son. It really is an unnecessary surgery. Thank you both for sharing your thoughts on this subject...
Sigma grindset rule 353: Circumcise your son, but stay intact yourself
@@maxhardcore8034 ?? What are you on about?
tell your son about restoration. it can be done with time
@@alvegutt42it takes years, not worth it
My mom laughed at me when I told her I was upset about it.
Thank you so much for this!! I don’t feel strange at my pride over having my foreskin! For example, I was made fun of A LOT in school bathrooms over my foreskin, & now I work in daycare, so any time I see an intact boy, my heart swells with pride!!
I m from India and I m not cut ..👍. As u mention there is no issue abt hygiene..👍. God gave you that for reason , he knows what he is doing … let’s not play with his creation… 🙏
My Penis Is Circumcised Since 2 Days Baby Just After Birth.....
Circumcised Penis Is Best Appearance.....
In My Country Many Boys Are Circumcised So It Is Not An Issue.
My body
My choice
Simple
I thought that was only for abortions
The 'look like dad' argument is so weird. Did any circumcised man care if they looked like their dad or not? How often are you looking at that anyway?
I think that is a good argument. My friend Kyra was indifferent about circumcising her boy but her circumcised boyfriend insisted on it. So their penises would look the same. There is a sauna in my building and I use it often. I love using it and thus would use it with my son. So I would get him circumcised, so our penises match. I guess many guys do not see their dad's penises often but the sauna is a factor.
@@scottwood928 So cutting off part of his penis is easier than explaining why it's different. Gotcha.
@@scottwood928that’s dumb. So you’d have a piece of your child cut off just so you look the same?! That’s horrible.
@@iyabomarvel8506 did you read what I wrote about my friend Kyra? That is a common reason for circumcision.
@@scottwood928 Saunas, strip clubs and Kyra... You don't have the best selection of friends, bruh!!
Im intact and absolutely glad that i am..you pick whats better for your son.." Looking the same" is not valid..
Some middle class women will avoid you. Circumcision is a symbol of social-economic class of the family.
@@kenwalker687 happilly with a woman with a masters degree .
Thank you for sharing.
Personally I'm against the practice when "just because"
But done for religious beliefs it is a whole different discussion.
When you are perfectly happy with being circumcised, that's all that matters, but the difference between done "well" and not is very important.
The opposite of circumcised is intact.
I think like getting tatoos, mutilating your body should be your decision, not the parents, or religion.
Circumcision is an indication of social-economic and educational status of the family. You do to your son what you want.
@@kenwalker687 you wont do anything to your son. You will let him make his own choices. Otherwise expect that he can sue you and you will have to pay the costs of restoration also.
It can also be traumatic for the baby, which is awful. I have a friend who has preverbal trauma from the experience. Terrible thing to do to someone
There's much evidence that this trauma actually changes the way the brain is "formatted". It's quite baffling how such a vile and barbaric practise continues unquestioned in the US, in light of present-day understanding of the harm. I think anyone considering it ought to watch a few videos of the "procedure" (I prefer the term mutilation, as that's what it is) before making their minds up. Perhaps read a few accounts of the many adult Americans who deeply regret that their parents did this to their penis.
You should let your son make the decision if he wants to mutilate his body. In my opinion, this procedure should be banned. Just do a quick google search and look at the benefits of having a foreskin.
Later in life, Oh the terrible pain!
@@kenwalker687I find it ironic that pro multilaters when circumcision is in the talk are like “oh it will only hurt a lil very little pain no bleeding” but when they get resistance “oh it’ll be so painful it’ll hurt so bad, your gonna struggle and it’s gonna be excruciating” Stop talking about it like said person is gonna get circumcised later.
G'day from Melbourne, Australia... thanks for a refreshing & informative discussion on the topic. I am a 50yo owner of a 'uncut' penis, I am grateful for how having the foreskin intact for masturbation, I've never had any issues with cleanlyness & a number sexual partners commented the comfort factor (gliding in/out of the vagina), along with handjobs being easier for females to perform. The choice getting circumcised, should not be influenced by doctors or decided by parents... the decision should upto the 'owner' of the penis, once they are 16+. "Vote #1 for keeping the penis hoodie!"
I was born in 1965 in Canada and I'm intact just like my dad. I recently asked him about that decision. He simply said we weren't Jewish so that's why we didn't choose to cut. Back then the docs didn't put on the pressure like today to get baby boys cut.
The risk of being permanently disfigured is pretty much 100%, this is not female circumcision!
If a ftaher wants his son to look like him then he should alter his own body to look like his son. A cut man could resort to 4skin restoration, a father with a son with a big mothers mark get a tatoo etc. There is actually a case of the latter. Do mother's who have a scar after an episiotomy want their daughters to be cut to look like them?
It is not a twosided issue where one side is as good as the other and arguments can be mirrored, no harmful cultural practice is. So no, boys who are cut, are not made fun of in the locker room since this is a feature of cutting cultures where the bodyshaming of the normal body is a means to enforce the social norm. The absence of a harmful cultural practice is not a social norm to be enforced, but simply for what it is and having part of your body amputated is not something to be made fun of.
It seems crazy to permanently alter a child based on the possible scenario the son asks why his penis doesn't look like his dad's. How often does this come up and couldn't you have a 2 minute conversation explaining why? I had a childhood friend who married a man who had part of his arm amputated. Would you remove the same part of a child's arm so they would 'look like dad'?
@@emmas4336 Not just crazy but barbaric.
Imagine in the very distant past when we were all Africans, two neighbouring tribes, one in the north and one in the south, who had fought off and on for generations over som strategic spiritual ground in the east. The northern tribe used a symbolic sideways outstretched left arm pointing in the direction of the ground whenever they encountered members of the southern tribe. After each periodic battle and peace treaty, irrespective of whether it had led to an exchange of control of the disputed ground, the tribes exchanged each others' captive warriors. One of the southern warriors experienced an unusual wound where a small part of his arm had been lost which meant he couldn't fully stretch his arm out sideways but otherwise was fully functional. A generation passed and there was a new battle over the disputed ground concluided with a new treaty. This time the southern chief got the idea that before making the time old exchange of captives he would have all the captives subjected to this unusual injury on their left arm so that they would be unable to make their arm gesture.
The returning northern warriors felt hugely humiliated by this and together with their chief decided this required a change in their traditions. The returning warriors told how they had been incredibly brave bearing the ill treatment meted out to them at the hands of their enemy and showed the scar in their arm as proof. The scar became a badge of distinction showing one was a real warrior and young warrior initiatives were eager to demonstrate the same bravery as their fathers, to be like them. So the infliction of this injury became part of the initiation rites for new warriors. The symbolic outstretched arm gesticulation was abandoned in favour of pointing at the scar in a show of defiance.
So yes, it is possible to imagine a situation where parents remove a part of a child's arm so they would 'look like dad'. In most of the modern world though we have come to value all the normal bodyparts of a natural body and Dads with amputations would prefer that they have a prosthesis if necessary to look like their normal son.
There aren’t any parents who have publicly stated that they are glad their kid was circumcised. There aren’t any parents who regret leaving their kid intact. There are many many parents and plenty of them Jewish who have publicly stated that having allowed the circumcision was the biggest regret of their entire life there’s absolutely nothing else they wish they could go back and undo more. And no one regrets having not done the circumcision
I do not believe you
@@kenwalker687 have you ever heard a parent say they are glad their kid was circumcised? Just type into RUclips “mom regrets circumcision” there are mountains of them
I just read a story of a lady she said when her son was born a few hours later the nurses asked her if she wanted him circumsized she said “duh” she said she heard her son screaming at the top of his lungs from down the hall but she doesn’t care because he’s going to thank her when he gets a bj at 13.
Can you tell me another part of healthy tissue routinely cut of for no reason?
Abortions
Guys DONT do it, u will regret it. I was cut as an adult 4 years ago, ruined my s*x life, destroyed sensitivity and pleasure, thats literally all it did. Lost the joy of intimacy, dont desire it anymore its more of a chore now, i hate the dr that convinced me to do it, and said it would not change the feeling LIES
When I was younger I thought the extra for skin was because your privates will get bigger and bigger once you’re older and the skin will stretch out perfectly to its size, and now that I’m older I see that 😅🐴
Foreskin Restoration is possible but that takes years. I learned that by research
I want to restore it
What is done or not done, let it be.
I talked my friend out of it and it didn’t even take that long most guys just wanna do it because they were circumcised themselves .. in my friends case he said oh it’s not clean mind u he was only uncircumcised for a few days in his life so I had to share my own personal story and yea 13 years later his boy is strong with no infections or nothing
USA is the only country where a majority oare routinely circumcised when they are newborns. Most (but not all) Israelis are circumcised, but for religious reasons. Circumcision is the norm in South Korea, but the procedure is carried out when a boy is between his 10th and 16th birthdays.
Many times I was the only guy in the locker room/showers with foreskin. I was never ridiculed, because by age 9-10, I discovered that retraction made my penis look circumcised. My foreskin is the reason why I surrendered my virginity almost 20 years after graduating from high school.
Circumcising is very important for health reasons!
Medical research says that circumcision can decrease the risk of:
human papillomavirus (HPV)
genital herpes simplex trichomoniasis
mycoplasma
syphilis
chancroid
Get circumcised!
it's child abuse, and done without male consent. His body his choice.
I concur. My hypothesis is that it’s done partly due to unconscious envy that the father holds.
All circumcisions are botched.
My book below discusses circumcision from a UK perspective. In the UK only 20% of males are circumcised. This in itself can cause foreskin dysphoria, leading circumcised men to regrow their foreskin, which is possible. Read the book to find out how this is done.
Also in my highschool the ones that got picked on were the circumcised ones …. There was only 3 in my PE class
#TeamForeskin✊
Great video and he is so right.
i had this conversation with my wife.
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
It is still difficult to accept that the decisision to multilate someones genitals is taken so lightly and as if it is just normal. Cirtcumcision is not a medical procedure, it is mutilation, period. Why is it so difficult for doctors and parents to see this.
1 Corinth. 7.19
Circumcision is nothing, and uncircumcision is nothing, but the keeping of the commandments of God [is something].
Matthew 22:36-37,39
Master, which is the great commandment in the law?
Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.
And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
Would you debate another dad, who is circumcised, who is in favour for his son? Do you think either of you might change your mind? Or each see another perspective?
with the answers he's given, about bodily autonomy and not getting an elective unnecessary surgery for a poor little baby, I can't see how he'd change his mind. anyone who'd argue otherwise has the burden of proof to prove why it's better than leaving everything intact as we were made to be
There's nothing wrong with circumcision. Circumcision reduces the risk of urinary tract infections.
@@cks7548 that just sounds like propaganda honestly
@@hllymchll Baby boys who are not circumcised face a 10-fold higher risk for urinary tract infection (UTI) in their first year than boys who are circumcised and a 23% increased risk of UTI through their lifetimes.
Baby boys who are not circumcised face a 10-fold higher risk for urinary tract infection (UTI) in their first year than boys who are circumcised and a 23% increased risk of UTI through their lifetimes. The findings are from a meta-analysis of 22 studies that examined the single risk factor of lack of circumcision for occurrence of UTI.
Researchers determined the prevalence and relative risk of UTI for boys aged younger than 1 year, 1 to 16 years, and older than 16 years and from this data calculated lifetime prevalence.
They found the likelihood of UTI between birth and 1 year to be 9.91 times higher in uncircumcised boys compared with those who were circumcised; 6.56 higher for uncircumcised boys aged 1 to 16 years; and 3.41 higher for uncircumcised boys aged 16 and older compared with circumcised men.
Urinary tract infections include infections of the kidneys, bladder, ureter, and urethra and are more common in the first year of life. Adverse effects can include kidney scarring, fever, pain, and septicemia.
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has stated that circumcision can reduce the risks for UTI, HIV and other sexually transmitted infections, and penile cancer, and that the health benefits outweigh the risk of complications from the procedure. However, AAP leaves the decision whether to circumcise up to the parents of the child.
Morris BJ, Wiswell TE. Circumcision and lifetime risk of urinary tract infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol. 2012. Epub ahead of print.
@@cks7548 There's nothing wrong as long as it is with the owner's informed consent otherwise it is a gross violation of their dignity. Circumcision does not reduce the risk of UTIs but increases it. Take a look at the data in the Global Health Data Exchange (A US organisation and so not exactly biased against the ritual). The estimnated risk of a US male neonate dying of a UTI in the fist week of life is almost 50 times what it is here in Denmark. The purported health benefits are all myths perpetuated by cutting communities. PS it doesn't cure epilepsy either.
No
why is the default position of earth mothers always anti circumcision
Easy peasy: "Earth Mothers" like nature, and that encompasses the human body's natural state. There is no sound reason to fillet and skin an infant's penis. They also prefer keeping things simple, and avoiding unnecessary modern things which do not promote holistic health for their families. I hope this helps you to better understand. An earth mum wouldn't have her son's toes and ears removed for similarly false "hygiene" reasons either!
The default position of every living creature is anti circumcision. It's only ever performed due to immense pressure from tribal chiefs raised in flesh cutting cultures. These cultures are in the minority, thankfully.
Glad iam circumcised,when 33 it resolved all intimate problems at a cut! Too easy to generalised re this intimate subject....each to there own circumcised /uncircumcised,not lost any sensation at all.
Well you were an adult, that's on the other end of deciding that for someone else's body without their consent
@@someguywithnoplan6395 exactly like a new lease of life,sure dont miss foreskin.
@@stevesparks9296 I'm pretty sure you're just Brian J Morris behind a sock puppet account now
@@someguywithnoplan6395 fair enough ...not a problem....happy christmas.
@@stevesparks9296 Merry Christmas
Never knew circumcision was a thing. My wife belongs to a muslim family and her parents wanted me to be circumcised. I was told every boy in their family has to go through this. A barber or hajjam was called to do it which is very common in rural India and it is celebrated like a ritual with friends and family.i was sitting on a stool surrounded by people and my legs wide open. Few were even holding my legs tightly and one covered my eyes I could feel the barber pulling my foreskin and checking the glans , he clamped the excess skin with something and chopped it with a blade. Everybody clapped and congratulated me as I was finally ready for marriage.
Forcibly cutting the foreskin of a minor is a terrible and cruel genital mutilation that must be rejected, prohibited and punished.
It's sad you were too weak to protect your own body from the irrational superstitions of your in-laws.
My Penis Is Circumcised Since 2 Days Baby Just After Birth.....
Circumcised Penis Is Best Appearance.....
In My Country Many Boys Are Circumcised So It Is Not An Issue.
@@jjpetersen5296 This is a cultural tradition. Who are you to protest? Not your or your child's body.
Intact penises do not have "excess skin." Those of us with circumcised penises are missing a viable part of our penises, because it ws cut off.
Ooof…That’s 9 regrettable minutes of my life I won’t get back…smh
Right! It’s so obvious that you shouldn’t take a razor to your infant’s genitals
I thought long and hard before circumcising my son and the parent shaming that you espouse is disgusting. Shame on you both
Circumcision destroy sex pleasure and sensitivity because foreskin has thousand of nerve tissue. If you are already circumcised you can regrow or restore your foreskin manually or foreskin restoration device. Clean pnis during bath, after urination and sex to prevent the risk of any problem. Use condoms to protect HIV and STD. Phimosis is not a disease to worry about unless there is any irritation, infection of the foreskin. Any irritation, infection, urinary tract infection is solve by medicine. Many people live with phimosis and enjoy sex life. Paraphimosis may go away on its own or solve by gently pressure the swelling foreskin and pulling it forward. Doctor may suggest circumcision because of their bloody money business. But do not circumcision. Clean pnis during bath, after urination and sex to prevent the risk of any problem.
I’m wondering how you came to the decision that it was ok to have a doctor remove a perfectly healthy part of your son’s body, altering him forever without his consent?
Shame on you!
Well you obviously didn't think hard enough. I say BS.
You deserve to be shamed.
Bodily autonomy is a serious issue.
Circumcise the baby! If there is one chance in a million of him needing it as an adult, it is better to get it over with. Some adults get circumcised and it costs thousands and takes weeks to recover. Also, circumcision prevents many problems and makes cleaning easier. For me, it would also be that I am circumcised and want our penises to look alike.
Problems in the pnis should be treated in the same way that problems in the vulva are treated, that is, with medication and naturally.
First of all, the "health benefits" have virtually been disproven.
Cleanliness is only an issue if you don't bathe (which it seems like most cut guys don't bathe properly).
If circumcision was so great, it wouldn't need to be forced onto infants.
The vast majority of intact men don't get cut.
Also, over 100 baby boys die every year from circumcision. And presumably even more have botched circumcisions.
There's a reason more and more people are deciding not to force a cosmetic surgery onto infants.
Also, why would you be looking at your sons genitalia so much?
Sounds like pedophilia to me...
@K.O.H go to a strip club and ask girls what they prefer. Most prefer circumcised guys and some will not date an uncircumcised man.
That’s totally wrong. Circumcision is unnecessary and it’s wrong. The chances of dying from circumcision at a young age is higher than an intact boy ever needing one later. It’s better to leave all baby boys intact throughout the world and then let them decide.
Don’t have strong feelings about mutilating the genitals of baby’s lmao