PHY104 - Distinctive Features II
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 янв 2013
- This second E-Lecture on Distinctive Features discusses the most widely used features of our time. It examines the main vocalic and consonantal features and shows how phonological rules and phonotactic statements can most efficiently be made using distinctive features and defining natural classes.
As usual we will take up all questions at the end of this month in our "Questions of the month Video".
JH
Mathematically, you are right.If features have "no meaning", i.e.they +/- X, Yand Z, everything would be fine. However, phonologists (e.g. Roca/Johnson) prefer "semantic" features, i.e. features that are meaningful. In their interpretation, Cardinals 1, 8, 9, and 16 are the only +HIGH vowels and Cardinaly 4,5,12 and 13 are the only + LOW vowels. So they don't use all 8 +HIGH values but 4 +HIGH and 12 - HIGH values (similarly with +/- LOW). That's why an additional "semantic feature is required.
Can I explain in Arabic so that I can understand that you know the conditions in the country
You're Such An Amazing Professor. Your Vids Are Really Of Great Help. Thank You.
If you have just 4 vowels you are absolutely right in having just 2 features, and it would not matter what you call them. So the feature vowel height with 4 values alone can easily be encoded with 2 features. But we have 16 Cardinal Vowels. Hence we need 5 features in total.
Great video! Thank you so much. One question though: shouldn't the features in the 'Coalescent Assimilation in RP' example change to +distributed in addition to the change to -anterior? Cheers
thanks for these lectures and additional explanations. I find them very illuminating and interesting
Incredible lecture! Thank You very much!
Fantastic, thank you!
Thank you, professor.
thx a lot!!!! I love this video!!!! it's so enlightening!
I always wondering what does 'the phonological redundancies' means ? can you give an example ?
Excellent
I didn't get it from 11:12 further about 'anterior'. if labials are included as anteriors, why is it that /p b/ sound are not marked with + ?
Thx for the effort
great lecture !! thanks
03:10 Where did the formula come from?
Hi. I believe you've made an error at 18:10 when you state that post-alveolar obstruents are [-distributed]. I think post-alveolars (as well as dentals) are always [+dist]; alveolars and retroflex are [-dist].
In this case, the rule should be that [+ant] becomes [-ant], and [-dist] becomes [+dist] in the environment mentioned.
Please correct me if I'm wrong but this is what several academic sources reveal.
Thanks,
Nathalia
Where does the equation come from? Why do we need to calculate the amount of distinctive features we need to measure sounds and why is it determined by this particular equation?
the feature for vowel height seems really weird to programmer like me. whereas in your example «high» and «low» seem to be redundant (they always have opposite values +h-l vs -h+l) four levels can be easily encoded with two bits of information «high» and «medium» +h-m +h+m -h+m -h-m, or even «high» and «"atr"» +h+a +h-a -h+a -h-a
actually 4 features is enough to define all 16 values: 2 for height, 1 for roundness, 1 for frontness. but my question was why you use 3 features to define height alone with low always being opposite of high... is this explicitly redundant on purpose (like control bit)?
thank u very much sir. it's really really helpful
i want to know how many distinctive features in phonology ?!
The difference between a sonorant and a continuant is very subtle.
Do you still need an explanation?
ha! right, it looks like I didn't pay attention to the lecture, sorry:) in my memory it was 1,2,7,8 high and 3,4,5,6 low. I rewatched it again and it turns out I'm arguing where I actually agree with what you say (just not with what I remember). It's still redundant in purely mathematical sense but it makes perfect semantic sense.
My idol 😍😍😍😍
If you may Sir, can you explain to us in the coming videos the difference bitween the complimentary distribution and the free variation in phonology, thank you so much.
The problem I have with the distinctive feature representation is:
1/ it does not represent all IPA consonants/vowels (limited to English, no lax/tense vowels, trill, flap, click)
2/ classification does not appear to be standardized
3/ inconsistent modelling of features: +/- vs +/0/- vs +
4/ allophones and co-articulation not represented
In the plural example you could have said sibilant fricatives => /Iz/, voiced => /z/ and voiceless => /s/ (given that as you mention, vowels are voiced).
I think, it is still applicable for any language, but you need to define what features are distinctive for a given language.
In this lecture (and its first part) there is an overview of distinctive features that can be used for any language.
Peace, Mister
Thanks for trying
أنا متواصل Mister معاك في كل الدروس لكن عندي طلب اريد ترجمة بالعربية اسفل الفيديو طبعا فضلا وليس امرا لان اللغه عندي ليس مئة فا المئة thank you very much