This explosion knocked something off my closet shelf and woke me up. In Anchorage, Alaska. My personal weather station logged an air pressure spike too. Kinda mind blowing.
@@DrJosh2 I got two air pressure spikes on my weather station. I live 16,000 km from Tonga! You can actually check Weather Underground and see the path of the shockwave from people's weather stations.
I was in Tonga during the eruption and was watching when the explosions came through the noise was immense and pressure wave from it you could feel on your face...
My friends who live on a hillside at Kaikoura on the north east side of the South Island of NZ, heard that explosion and their windows got a good shaking.
I also heard the explosion in northland New Zealand, it was a very loud bang and pressure wave. It felt like being in a car when someone slam's the door shut!
I wonder if it was like what I experienced when a anti tank mine blew up under the vehicle in front of me. I was driving behind it about 2 cars lengths away. The blast wave was intense and scrambled my mind. Thinking about how powerful this volcanos eruption was, I can only imagine 😅.
Thank you Anton for this new information. We here in Lismore NSW had a flood , that resulted in the largest natural disaster in modern Australian history. 14 m + water level's through the CBD and surrounding districts. Landslides, lost of at least 10,000 homes and businesses. All linked to a rain bomb associated with the eruption.
Hey mate I live not far from Lismore, I agree, the fact that the 2 worst historic floods prior were 1954 and 1974, and both coincide with a lot of volcanic activity in the right places at the right time, don't need a degree to connect the dots 😅
I live in the North Island, NZ. We heard Hunga Tonga erupt over 2000kms away. New Zealand experienced severe rain events immediately after. Cyclone Dovi & Cyclone Gabrielle. "Hawkes Bay Summer" still hasn't returned to the East Coast.
Remember hearing it too. Was in Whangamata when I heard it. Flooding, cyclones, longer periods of rain. I think it's only corrected itself in the last couple of months.
did you really? I'm in Sydney and if you heard it maybe we could have, but the inner-city has such a large background signal with engines and construction booms/bangs, not to mention constant aircraft noise (and my house is under the flight path!) - there would have been little chance differentiating it.
I believe it's a natural nuclear explosion; the belief that a volcano is from pressure is so ridiculous, almost as bad as the belief that our oceans came from meteors... this was bigger than Washington and Oregon put together, the EMP and lightning says it all.
@@andrewn7365 As I understand it, lightening produces radio waves. Don't ask what frequency though LOL. There are thousands of sensors around the world that detect these frequencies and by triangulation, the location is determined. Cool stuff.
Stuff like this most recent paper remids me why improving sensors and logging data are so important. New brains keep looking at it and finding new stuff for a long time to come.
It helps if those sensors are actually watching a specific volcano at a specific time too. BTW.. not just ‘new’ brains are out there crackin this stuff.
what are they going to tell you? There is a large volcano about to erupt in 15 minutes larger than any volcano in history, and the safest place to be is 10,000 miles away on the top of a mountain inland china
I was on the Tonga volcano in 2019, I sailed my boat and anchored in the Lee of the volcano. I spent 3 days climbing around and there was vegetation starting to grow.
@@johnscott2746 The comment above doesn't even mention the eruption, just that they were there in 2019 and that vegetation was starting to grow. In the context of this video, the island only formed in 2015 and there was a satellite shot showing vegetation growing and this island was a good insight into life forming in somewhat isolated environments. Doesn't even seem to be talking about the eruption to me, let alone disputing the fact the eruption took place in 2022. They were there before it happened.
Yet the C02 agenda are covering up the largest climatic event in 200 years, in order to push the C02 agenda. I am not a climate denier, but I do not follow agendas. Adding over 10% moisture to the world in a matter of weeks, has to have an effect! Meant will all respect to Anton!
Males you wonder if all the crazy floods in odd locations around the planet the last 3 years might be an aftereffect of all the water blasted into the upper atmosphere. Males more sense than cow farts.
Yeah they're pretty sure it dialled up all the weather systems in western pacific to 11 for months when that stratospheric water vapour moved in a big lump down to Antarctica. The circulating polar winds stayed tightened up instead of expanding out, so a lot more tropical moisture came south
I remember hearing sounds from the eruption here in the western part of South Africa some 11 hours after the initial explosion. The staccato-like sound pattern. lasting 15 seconds or so, was unlike anything I had ever heard before. At first, I had no idea what created such a sound. Later, after reading reports from various locations about the traveling sound, I was able to make sense of what I had heard. Memorable event!
What continues to fascinate me is just how few people I know even heard of this explosion let alone have the faintest clue of the impacts it’s had on the weather. Thank you for this update.
i think thats because there wasnt huge destruction and death, i was living in auckland there was no tsunami but it def knocked over a few boats in the marina, im back living in whakatane and we got white island here ffs
white island is the one that erupted in 2019 while they had two boats of tourists on the island killing 26.its been smoking alot these last few days too
The tropical regions often produce outstanding lighting and thunder, but what you have described Anton is completely "NUTS ", always well presented and explained thankyou
Forest fires cause ecological destruction too, but they are also very healthy (and in some cases, necessary) to help certain species, like Sequoia, to reproduce. As well as kill off non-native invasive species. So there's a high probability this will lead to an explosion of growth around the site in the very near future.
Thank You Sir❤ there's a lot of people in Aotearoa that don't even want to acknowledge this kind of work your doing but I think it's very important and we Thank You 🙏🏿
The content of your videos are always informative, not sensationalised, factual and well presented. Thank you so very much for your work. And an extra special thank you for not having a massive microphone in the middle of your face which seems to be the RUclips craze at the moment.
I woke up at about 3:30 in the morning to pee camping in Ketchikan AK and I heard this volcano. Got into the coffee shop at 6:00 and it was all over Facebook
@ I thought a large fishing boat fell off of hanging straps as they’ll pull boats out and clean underneath. They use huge lifts and massive straps. Also reminded me of a pallet of plywood falling flat, I was confused and looking down near the water for lights but no one was awake and no lights were on.
@@weswarren5987 I stock at Costco, I am _intimately_ familiar with wood pallets falling flat on the ground. Now I know what Tonga sounded like, interesting. Good analogy.
Wonderfully informative… what’s even more amazing is you managed to only say the volcanos name once (unlike almost every other video about it) thereby giving yourself twice as much time to tell us interesting things. 😎
Very interesting video. I live in Peru, a country with both active volcanos and many earthquakes, so these discoveries are of particular interest to me.
Queensland, Australia. Did it affect the climate here? Hell, yea it did! '23-'24; monsoonal downpours as far south as Brisbane, we had a rain event that lasted for 3 days straight- non stop! Now, even 3 years later, that moisture is still coming back down.
Here on the sunny coast, the red dawns didn't happen for at least a year. Everything was kind of whitewashed at dawn. 1980 was our biggest year for rain with an 800 mm average. Now or as of last year, 510 mm. 1920. 375 mm. Makes me think that dust that is the nuclei of a raindrop is co2. And the earth is a lot smarter than science. And self regulating.
Relative to the atmosphere as a whole there was virtually zero extra moisture. The vapor from Hunga corresponded to roughly 0.001% of the vapor present in the atmosphere at all times. It was only relative to the dry stratosphere that it had any significance, but that doesn't have anything to do with any extra rain. All the people trying to ascribe tons of rain to this eruption really have no idea what they're talking about, that was all La Niña.
Great summary Anton. When you talked about the huge number of lightening strikes during the eruption, the thought occurred to me that this could be a potential source of lightening energy needed billions of years ago, to jump start organic life on earth. Early earth must have had numerous volcanic eruptions and if lightening super events occurred in the vicinity of these eruptions, then perhaps organic life could have been kick started by one or more of these events...
Current theory points more at undersea hot water vents as the source of first life. Continuous available energy, both thermal and chemical. You're thinking of the old Miller-Urey experiments making organics from inorganics, which is now known to be largely pointless. At the time we were quite wrong, and thought organics were only produced by life. We know KNOW that pre-life Earth would have been covered by organics from fallen asteroids and comets.
Also possible from the thousands of natural nuclear reactors back then as radiation also allows chemical reactions to go both directions, and higher energy input as lightning, but the difference being continuous energy input, instead of intermittent. But, both are viable causes.
@@ProfessorJayTee"we were super wrong THEN, but are super right NOW" OR, hear me out now, science has to admit that abiogenesis is factually impossible, because it's more likely that a watch factory explodes and makes multiple self replicating watches, than that life came from not life. But yet life is here, which causes science all kinds of headaches
You dump that much extra moisture into the atmosphere without expecting it to then fall as rain before once again achieving balance, unrealistic expectation.
@@vumba1331 the water vapour went into the stratosphere, it didn't fall as rain, but it did have some effects on local weather systems that very likely exacerbated existing la nina conditions
@lauroralei Very likely? Record floods in New Zealand, roads, bridges and houses washed away, power grid damaged and entire valley filled with vineyards and orchards covered in 1.5 m of silt, you think!
This was really lucky to be caught from Space. I'm sure there are plenty of undersea volcanos erupting we don't see, here and there, that we don't see. Cheers Anton. Always a 👍.
Hunga Tonga Hunga A'pai was an amazing eruption on so many levels. One day I'm going to make a collection of all the different papers for my own library. Until then I can count on you to keep us updated on the latest fascinating discoveries. 💜👋
The stratospheric water vapour content dramatically increased after the eruption. This area is typically very dry. It had an impact on temperature. There are papers that talk to this but of course that's not a popular topic.
Laughable troll parade above. There are dozens of scientific papers and loads of books who deal with the effects of volcanic eruptions on climate. Now put ur head underground again.
yeah, didn't he say that the eruption increased the water vapor by 10% for several years (well, for three years now)? Water vapor is by far the strongest contributor to the greenhouse effect (about 95%, isn't it?). So there is a problem in the equation somewhere...
Extremophile archaea found after the eruption also indicates their ubiquity, and helps explain why deep sea vent bacteria are also found in the human microbiome. Another great, real science video production, Anton 👍
I saw the 'Tonga sunset' here in Kutztown, PA, the result of sulfur particles spreading across earth and through the atmosphere. It was the most beautiful sunset I had ever seen. Every color imaginable. Pinks, purples, oranges, yellows. I took a picture from my window, not realizing at the time that this was what I was witnessing.
Do people not realise that water vapor is also a greenhouse gas? If the temperature didn't change due to this, i would be surprised seeing as water vapor is 10% higher for 3 years.
Thanks for this info, I must have had it in the back of my head but forgot about it. I was learning about the weather and local climate affects newly built dams in China were having and I remember being very surprised that the weather got hotter and they actually had less rainfall even though they had this new water mass the was constantly evaporating right next to them. Now one needs to start thinking, if the oceans are heating up, more water will evaporate and temperatures will go up even faster. Maybe more rainfall in some areas but overall things are getting more hot. Looking at Los Angeles and the lack of rain they have had now in the rainy season and hell like fires raging right now we are seeing changes that we have not in our lifetime seen before. I was initially hoping that the Tonga explosion would actually reduce global temperatures by a little for a few years, but seems not enough dust and to much water vapor ?? Learning is such a wonderful thing
Indeed. I thought that water vapour is the most important greenhouse gas of all of them (50% of all greenhouse effect). We were supposed to have an El Niño the year after that eruption, but instead of Sydney being hot and dry, it was wet and humid.
@M3au yeah i was living in sydney and I remember the non stop rain, also drove through the middle of australia and it was not desert but green, when I drive through previously it was red dust
@@solon2923yes, every climate model requires higher water vapor to get the runway doom effect. Every model takes tiny, less effective greenhouse gasses, and uses them to boost water vapor which is what actually causes the heating. But, all the models forget something ELSE that more water vapor means: more clouds. Clouds reflect sunlight across the full spectrum, so less solar radiance to heat the planet. Also, more water vapor helps plants (as does high CO2, up to about 1500 ppm, and we're under 500 ppm currently...) so more carbon capture. Lastly, more precipitation, so less desertification and fresh water supply, including potentially recharging ground water aquifers (especially with beaver dams and other things to slow water flow down instead of just rushing to the ocean). It's a lot more able to self balance than climate alarmists give credit.
“Studies” finding no heating effect from 10% more water in the stratosphere are bogus. The global average warmth spike since summer 2023 must be somehow attributed to human activity rather than natural causes.
China Hattie so bad they could not invade Taiwan. Mountainous regions have it the worst hence fleeting Afghanistan to avoid military protection liabilities.
1:44 those lightning strikes must have been traveling through the saltwater, man I'd be happy to get a sample to see if it split atoms or some indication of electralysis, since the ash would have also been in contact with the saltwater.
Humm What this seismic detection brings to mind for me is the bay off of Naples. Whare that caldera (Campi Flegrei caldera), is under the Mediterranean. If that cracks it will launch that entire city in to orbit.
I live in central Queensland Australia and I noticed that in the summer time the temperature only got over 40 degrees C 3 times. We had a mild summer with lots of rain !
And the damage caused to the ocean floor by that reliable old truck was because of the gross negligence of oil companies, despite what they say about caring about people and the environment.
The two main constituents to form natural ozone are sea water and sunlight. Antarctica is naturally low in ozone because of this lack of sunlight and seawater. The ozone hole has always existed as long as continentally Antarctica has been positioned over the South Pole. CFCs are not the reason for the ozone hole.
I'm from Australia and you can still see the haze in the air from the eruption coursing red sunsets and sunrises. the summers here have been slightly colder and wetter since the eruption. maybe the heating affect you were speaking of may start to take affect after the haze causing particles have settled down.
I was a kid when Mt. St. Helen erupted, and it caused cold spells, not warming. I wonder why they thought a huge plume of ash shading and cooling the ground across entire countries would cause "warming"? 🤔
@elk3909 Not for weeks, though. I live in the Midwest, and the sky looked smokey for weeks from Washington to the Atlantic Ocean. The ash is dense and reflective. So, it reflects and refracts the sunlight so that it can't warm the ground. It likely affected the entire globe because as areas cool, it draws heat from the surrounding areas, and that sets off storm fronts, triggering a chain event. Check the weather records. There definitely wasn't any major warming from the steam anywhere but within a few hundred feet from the site, it may have raised the temperature by a degree for a few minutes. I'm not spouting my own personal theory here. The cooling is a recorded, provable fact
It's been raining every other day in Central Queensland for about 3 years. 😅 I have gotten in the habit to hang my washing up the minute the clouds clear up. Take it down as soon. As they are dry
0:15 On that violet simulation of whatever (clouds???) you can see the circular eruption, but there is also another circle, seemingly emerging at the same time. It's right of the eruption. Does anybody know what that is?
@@LoganPEade RIGHT? I was also thinking of another eruption first, but that would be THOUSANDS of miles. And would be a weird coincidence. Then I thought of a kind of echo or, as you say, an artifact. I really want to know what it actually is.
@@johannageisel5390 There were several other active volcanoes erupting along the west coast of South America. It could have been a less violent eruption in Chile or something.
I believe there was a least one intense tropical storm in the vicinity. If you're into the deep dive, I would try to find satellite data for the eruption that lines up with view. If I remember correctly, at least one storm seemed to intensify when the energy of the eruption hit it. There was so much energy released in the ocean and atmosphere with this eruption.
Central Scotland was hit by an electrical storm in July 1961. 2600 lightning strikes a second in that one if you ask me. 200 years of statically charged industrial pollution in that one. It lasted 30 hours.
About the temperature increase...perhaps the amount of water in the atmosphere (greenhouse effect) was offset by the shading of the airborne particulate matter produced by the volcano.
It was so powerful it affected gps satellites, but it didn't really affect the weather. Now consider the Franklin LIP basalt flood eruption turned the whole planet into snowball earth.
But human industrialisation hasn't been going on for 4.6 billion years; volcanic eruptions, floods, meteorite impacts and anything else you care to imagine, has. I'll clue you in, that's 4,600,000,000 vs 250 give or take for industrialisation that had to ramp up to noticeable levels. I'll also counter by saying that the human population should never have been able to grow from around 770m to 8bn, because every one of those people requires Earth's resources. Cause and effect.
@@beedoox5613So... What point are you trying to make? I would tend to agree with the original thought that typical volcanic eruptions, and even large ones like this, do represent only a blip, per se, when compared to the ongoing destruction of the environment that's being wrought by human industrialization.
@@stargazer5784 I don't disagree with the idea that this volcanic eruption could represent a mere blip but I have no way to measure that - and frankly, I don't care either. If the numbers are to be believed and today our collective emissions are in the region of 100x that of all the volcanic eruptions on Earth - then we should acknowledge it's not been consistently 100x for the entirety of the human industrialisation era, as we started with a fraction of the population and a tiny amount of industrialisation that would likely not even have registered. On the flip-side, 250 years of so-called industrialisation (if we yield to that time period) doesn't even register vs the age of the Earth, and the fact that it started as an inhospitable molten ball of rock, cooled, warmed cooled, warmed, had ice that covered most of the planet, had high oxygen levels, became saturated with CO2, had a well known medieval warm period, natural forest fires, dealt with continental shift (affecting climate), Earth's position in the solar system and galaxy, Solar cycles etc. etc. All without human industrialisation. The list of data-points is massive and endless! Now, do think it's shitty that we've cut down so much rain-forest? Yes, and I also think it's shitty that we've allowed the population to explode from 770m to 8bn in such a short amount of time. I also think it's shitty that the big polluters can't capture and store their soot and other pollutants - but the data scientist in me also refuses to believe that in less than 200 years, we've done more damage to the Earth (climate-wise) than it has suffered through all the natural events that have occurred during its 4.6bn years.
Something is not right here. While CO2 contributes 12% to effective greenhouse gases water vapor contributes 70% of effective green house gases. So a 10 % increase in water vapor would mean a 7% increase in effective greenhouse gases which more than have that of all the CO2 contribution. So how is it possible that the warming effect was so minimal?
hmmm yeah - I'd like to know that as well. And 10% increase in world-wide H2O from a single event - that's huge. Wonder if that's 10% for like a few hours but then drops off quickly due to precipitation. Maybe you need a permanent or at least extended period 10% to have the full effect. It has to be something like that otherwise the values are way off.
@@bonysminiatures3123 If you're on the East coast of US buy a surf board, just on the off chance that Las Palma decides to collapse. 🌊 If you're on the West coast, do the same, in case the San Andreas unzips.🌊 I jest! Nonetheless, never say "never!" about anything, however remote the chance of it happening might be. It merely temps fate. 😎👍
Lighting flashes are connected to the Schumer resonance, I speculate that the avg. vibration of the Schumer will increase in the long run, earth will vibrate higher
@ yesterday I actually saw UAPs for the first time over Jamestown RI with my whole family, around 20 of them. Please specify about your comment. Did you mean to say something constructive or just tried to bring me down with an insult?
@@MilushevGeorgimost UAPs end up being something boring like a plane, drone or satellite. Extra ordinary events require extra ordinary evidence. Did you film it? With something higher than 140p? Just because you don’t understand what they are, does not mean they are UAP’s. If you have evidence I would get in contact with your local observatory to discuss possibilities, or an astrophysicist
@@tomp.55 1973 November, Chapman Road, New Hartford, Oneida County, New York my high school best friend and I were heading west in a car around 10 PM. An object overhead trailing light streaked across the sky heading south west, ricocheted/angled -45 degrees to the north, angled -45 degrees again to the south west, then split in two at 90 degree angle and disappeared over the tree line of the opposite side of the valley horizon. The entire time it was visible was about 3 seconds. What would contacting my local observatory to discuss possibilities or an astrophysicist add to the observation?
Too bad he avoided talking about the volcano dramatically affected weather patterns. It didn’t affected temperatures but it did affected weather patterns. Like how 2021 had the most rain for Australia and California. And as of 2024/2025 Pacific Northwest is supposed to be having a La Niña winter but ended up getting a mild winter.
@@mickrivard8344 you do historically that the earth nearly had glaciers near the equator millions years ago is one of our great die offs to. Also was a lot warmer during the age of the dinosaurs. The earth has ways off changing its own weather patterns that humans can’t control we are just a long for the ride. I would like to point at there was a beach in Australia that people said it would be under water in 100 years. Guess what the beach is still there the water levels hasn’t changed yet. Yes I know we are flooding but the reason why we are flooding in costal areas is because we are affecting the local area that makes flooding worse. Like dredging a coastal river to allow bigger ships to navigate which in effect has more tidal flooding do the increase of water from the deeper river.
0:15 in the video. Clear expanding shock wave around the volcano. Bottom left. But closer to the center of the image there's another expanding circle. Go on a bit, at 0:18, a second starts. Far left, just below center, there's a circle there too. What causes those?
This explosion knocked something off my closet shelf and woke me up. In Anchorage, Alaska. My personal weather station logged an air pressure spike too. Kinda mind blowing.
@@DrJosh2 I got two air pressure spikes on my weather station. I live 16,000 km from Tonga!
You can actually check Weather Underground and see the path of the shockwave from people's weather stations.
I was in Tonga during the eruption and was watching when the explosions came through the noise was immense and pressure wave from it you could feel on your face...
My friends who live on a hillside at Kaikoura on the north east side of the South Island of NZ, heard that explosion and their windows got a good shaking.
Mind blowing your experience ! Captured by you 🙏🫶🏽🇦🇺
I also heard the explosion in northland New Zealand, it was a very loud bang and pressure wave.
It felt like being in a car when someone slam's the door shut!
I also in the Tonga Eruption, no big deal, since iam a Super Hero and nothing can harm me.
I wonder if it was like what I experienced when a anti tank mine blew up under the vehicle in front of me. I was driving behind it about 2 cars lengths away. The blast wave was intense and scrambled my mind. Thinking about how powerful this volcanos eruption was, I can only imagine 😅.
Australia and New Zealand both had record rains and severe flooding for up to 18 months after.
And ongoing....
The news weather talked about 'atmospheric rivers'
Global warming. Not volcano.
I really believe there are still affects on southern hemisphere weather attributable to the eruption to this day.
Thank you Anton for this new information. We here in Lismore NSW had a flood , that resulted in the largest natural disaster in modern Australian history. 14 m + water level's through the CBD and surrounding districts. Landslides, lost of at least 10,000 homes and businesses. All linked to a rain bomb associated with the eruption.
Hey mate I live not far from Lismore, I agree, the fact that the 2 worst historic floods prior were 1954 and 1974, and both coincide with a lot of volcanic activity in the right places at the right time, don't need a degree to connect the dots 😅
No no no, it was climate change. Stop driving your car to save the environment.
It's really awful that more of us around the world know very little or nothing about this correlation. 😕
@@nickerzzbell4811 @desmcharris Hi from just to the east a little. Yeh I still look at Lismore & cannot believe how high the water level was! ❤
Last 3 years have been unusually wet on the entire eastern coast of Australia. A few papers have been published on it already
I live in the North Island, NZ. We heard Hunga Tonga erupt over 2000kms away. New Zealand experienced severe rain events immediately after. Cyclone Dovi & Cyclone Gabrielle. "Hawkes Bay Summer" still hasn't returned to the East Coast.
Remember hearing it too. Was in Whangamata when I heard it. Flooding, cyclones, longer periods of rain. I think it's only corrected itself in the last couple of months.
Obviously it was related but we have to pretend humans are more powerful than volcanoes
Heard that eruption in Omaio SH35 55 ks northeast of Opotiki
Live in Tasmania Australia, heard the boom and we are 1000's of km's away!
did you really? I'm in Sydney and if you heard it maybe we could have, but the inner-city has such a large background signal with engines and construction booms/bangs, not to mention constant aircraft noise (and my house is under the flight path!) - there would have been little chance differentiating it.
Same in auckland nz
i heard it in South East Queensland, Australia. i thought it was a bomb until i saw Antons video
@@WillArtie It was late afternoon heard the 'boooommm' low rumble for 15secs after that. Had no idea until next day when GeologyHub posted a video lol
Alaska too..
The lightning produced is phenomenal.
Wow!
Would have been cool to see…..or terrifying!
I wonder how we collect that data. My guess is satellites detecting light flashes? Whatever it is I bet it'll be cool to learn about.
I believe it's a natural nuclear explosion; the belief that a volcano is from pressure is so ridiculous, almost as bad as the belief that our oceans came from meteors... this was bigger than Washington and Oregon put together, the EMP and lightning says it all.
@@andrewn7365 As I understand it, lightening produces radio waves. Don't ask what frequency though LOL. There are thousands of sensors around the world that detect these frequencies and by triangulation, the location is determined. Cool stuff.
It’s a dry heat
Stuff like this most recent paper remids me why improving sensors and logging data are so important. New brains keep looking at it and finding new stuff for a long time to come.
The alarmists ignored this and kept quiet and blamed the volcanic atmospheric effects on "climate change".....
it's very hard to have too much data
It helps if those sensors are actually watching a specific volcano at a specific time too.
BTW.. not just ‘new’ brains are out there crackin this stuff.
@@JasonKing-m6mbut… it is climate change. previous volcanos didn’t have such effect, so blaming vulcanos doesn’t make sense.
what are they going to tell you? There is a large volcano about to erupt in 15 minutes larger than any volcano in history, and the safest place to be is 10,000 miles away on the top of a mountain inland china
A lot of "I never knew" facts. Thank you! 👍👍🇨🇦
Brilliant upload, Anton! You set the bar, and you keep it there.
I was on the Tonga volcano in 2019, I sailed my boat and anchored in the Lee of the volcano.
I spent 3 days climbing around and there was vegetation starting to grow.
But this eruption happened in 2022.
@@michaelmetzger749 They are not disputing that.
@@andrewford80they seem to be. If they were on the volcano in 2019, that was 3 years before the eruption.
@@johnscott2746 The comment above doesn't even mention the eruption, just that they were there in 2019 and that vegetation was starting to grow.
In the context of this video, the island only formed in 2015 and there was a satellite shot showing vegetation growing and this island was a good insight into life forming in somewhat isolated environments.
Doesn't even seem to be talking about the eruption to me, let alone disputing the fact the eruption took place in 2022.
They were there before it happened.
@@andrewford80i understand all that but why make the comment at all on a video about the eruption? The whole comment seems out of place.
We had unusually heavy rain for months after in New Zealand
Yet the C02 agenda are covering up the largest climatic event in 200 years, in order to push the C02 agenda.
I am not a climate denier, but I do not follow agendas. Adding over 10% moisture to the world in a matter of weeks, has to have an effect!
Meant will all respect to Anton!
Yep. Weird in Aus as well.
It wouldn't stop raining for like 2 weeks a couple times
Males you wonder if all the crazy floods in odd locations around the planet the last 3 years might be an aftereffect of all the water blasted into the upper atmosphere. Males more sense than cow farts.
Yeah they're pretty sure it dialled up all the weather systems in western pacific to 11 for months when that stratospheric water vapour moved in a big lump down to Antarctica. The circulating polar winds stayed tightened up instead of expanding out, so a lot more tropical moisture came south
I remember hearing sounds from the eruption here in the western part of South Africa some 11 hours after the initial explosion. The staccato-like sound pattern. lasting 15 seconds or so, was unlike anything I had ever heard before. At first, I had no idea what created such a sound. Later, after reading reports from various locations about the traveling sound, I was able to make sense of what I had heard. Memorable event!
The rain in New Zealand was unusually heavy for months after-something we hadn’t seen in years.
Nonsense, that was because of idiots who insist climate change isn't largely due to their own selfish habits.
That was climate change, nothing else.
yes and normally they would blame it on nonsense climate change
It has not really improved weather wise since that eruption to be honest.
@@bonysminiatures3123 you're really commenting that on this channel?
Way CooL information we're learning from this event! Thanks Anton! ✨️
You never cease to amaze with your information on all the topics you cover , not just space news . Thanks.
Anton is amazing thank you for your hard work and inspiration ❤
What continues to fascinate me is just how few people I know even heard of this explosion let alone have the faintest clue of the impacts it’s had on the weather. Thank you for this update.
i think thats because there wasnt huge destruction and death, i was living in auckland there was no tsunami but it def knocked over a few boats in the marina, im back living in whakatane and we got white island here ffs
white island is the one that erupted in 2019 while they had two boats of tourists on the island killing 26.its been smoking alot these last few days too
Every time I watch one of your videos, I learn something. And you call me wonderful! 👍
The tropical regions often produce outstanding lighting and thunder, but what you have described Anton is completely "NUTS ", always well presented and explained thankyou
Wonderful as always Anton. Thank you. 🙂
Good to see you, Anton. Thanks for another great video!
Total ecological destruction underwater. Not surprising but still chilling.
Yes as if it's been occurring for 1000s of years
It will come back stronger than ever...
Just look up pictures of Mount St Helen's from after eruption to now, quite remarkable what nature can do
@@AH-lw2bjI wonder of any of the animals that died would have cared.
@@ericmaclaurin8525 i don't know, does a mouse care when it gets snatched by an eagle?
Forest fires cause ecological destruction too, but they are also very healthy (and in some cases, necessary) to help certain species, like Sequoia, to reproduce. As well as kill off non-native invasive species.
So there's a high probability this will lead to an explosion of growth around the site in the very near future.
Thank You Sir❤ there's a lot of people in Aotearoa that don't even want to acknowledge this kind of work your doing but I think it's very important and we Thank You 🙏🏿
energy from the lighting alone would be incredible
It always blows my mind to see that some wonderful people were brave enough to have a walk on that island long before the eruption...
Great follow-up. Thanks
We heard/felt the shockwave here in South Georgia and had no idea what it was until we saw your video about the shockwave.
The cheese smile at the end is great, thanks for giving me a distraction during my lunch break.
The content of your videos are always informative, not sensationalised, factual and well presented.
Thank you so very much for your work.
And an extra special thank you for not having a massive microphone in the middle of your face which seems to be the RUclips craze at the moment.
I've been patiently waiting for this video.
I wasn't sure what long term effect it would have on the planet but I wasn't expecting nothing.
Love your passion for facts in all your podcasts. Thanks Anton.
I woke up at about 3:30 in the morning to pee camping in Ketchikan AK and I heard this volcano. Got into the coffee shop at 6:00 and it was all over Facebook
What a beautiful area
@ indeed, I spent almost four years there
What did it sound like? What sound would you compare it to?
@ I thought a large fishing boat fell off of hanging straps as they’ll pull boats out and clean underneath. They use huge lifts and massive straps. Also reminded me of a pallet of plywood falling flat, I was confused and looking down near the water for lights but no one was awake and no lights were on.
@@weswarren5987 I stock at Costco, I am _intimately_ familiar with wood pallets falling flat on the ground. Now I know what Tonga sounded like, interesting. Good analogy.
Jes, Your right decision to summarize actual findouts now.Very interesting and well reported 🙂
Don't feel like 3 years. It feels like that eruption happened just a few months ago. Time is goin so fast.
Very nice video Anton!
Thanks, Anton. This looks interesting.
Wonderfully informative… what’s even more amazing is you managed to only say the volcanos name once (unlike almost every other video about it) thereby giving yourself twice as much time to tell us interesting things. 😎
Very interesting video. I live in Peru, a country with both active volcanos and many earthquakes, so these discoveries are of particular interest to me.
Queensland, Australia. Did it affect the climate here? Hell, yea it did!
'23-'24; monsoonal downpours as far south as Brisbane, we had a rain event that lasted for 3 days straight- non stop!
Now, even 3 years later, that moisture is still coming back down.
Here on the sunny coast, the red dawns didn't happen for at least a year. Everything was kind of whitewashed at dawn.
1980 was our biggest year for rain with an 800 mm average.
Now or as of last year, 510 mm.
1920. 375 mm.
Makes me think that dust that is the nuclei of a raindrop is co2.
And the earth is a lot smarter than science. And self regulating.
Quackers…”a lot smarter than science” you make me laugh and laugh. You know nothing.
@@quackyduck1499Ur a Fruitloop
Relative to the atmosphere as a whole there was virtually zero extra moisture. The vapor from Hunga corresponded to roughly 0.001% of the vapor present in the atmosphere at all times. It was only relative to the dry stratosphere that it had any significance, but that doesn't have anything to do with any extra rain. All the people trying to ascribe tons of rain to this eruption really have no idea what they're talking about, that was all La Niña.
Great summary Anton. When you talked about the huge number of lightening strikes during the eruption, the thought occurred to me that this could be a potential source of lightening energy needed billions of years ago, to jump start organic life on earth. Early earth must have had numerous volcanic eruptions and if lightening super events occurred in the vicinity of these eruptions, then perhaps organic life could have been kick started by one or more of these events...
Current theory points more at undersea hot water vents as the source of first life. Continuous available energy, both thermal and chemical. You're thinking of the old Miller-Urey experiments making organics from inorganics, which is now known to be largely pointless. At the time we were quite wrong, and thought organics were only produced by life. We know KNOW that pre-life Earth would have been covered by organics from fallen asteroids and comets.
Which current theory is this?
Also possible from the thousands of natural nuclear reactors back then as radiation also allows chemical reactions to go both directions, and higher energy input as lightning, but the difference being continuous energy input, instead of intermittent. But, both are viable causes.
@@ProfessorJayTee"we were super wrong THEN, but are super right NOW"
OR, hear me out now, science has to admit that abiogenesis is factually impossible, because it's more likely that a watch factory explodes and makes multiple self replicating watches, than that life came from not life.
But yet life is here, which causes science all kinds of headaches
@@michaelsorensen7567 Ah yes, we should all stop worrying our little heads and just accept that it's MAGIC!
Great video ,l really enjoyed it,thanks Anton👍❤
This was coupled with an extended La Nina and produced a large increase in rainfall across most of Australia.
You dump that much extra moisture into the atmosphere without expecting it to then fall as rain before once again achieving balance, unrealistic expectation.
@@vumba1331 the water vapour went into the stratosphere, it didn't fall as rain, but it did have some effects on local weather systems that very likely exacerbated existing la nina conditions
@lauroralei Very likely? Record floods in New Zealand, roads, bridges and houses washed away, power grid damaged and entire valley filled with vineyards and orchards covered in 1.5 m of silt, you think!
Lake Eyre is now dry
@@oliverduke1173 What is its normal state?
Hello wonderful Anton 🙂
This was really lucky to be caught from Space. I'm sure there are plenty of undersea volcanos erupting we don't see, here and there, that we don't see. Cheers Anton. Always a 👍.
Hunga Tonga Hunga A'pai was an amazing eruption on so many levels. One day I'm going to make a collection of all the different papers for my own library. Until then I can count on you to keep us updated on the latest fascinating discoveries. 💜👋
"Tonga" just rolls off the tongue so well
Bulbous bouffant, macadamia, gazebo
Galoshes, blubber, beluga
@@mylaughinghog Macadamia? Ain't that where Alexander the Great is from?
Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai is a bit of a mouthful though.
Thank you, Anton for this interesting post. Our earth is a mysterious and interesting place to live, and we learn something new every day.
The stratospheric water vapour content dramatically increased after the eruption. This area is typically very dry.
It had an impact on temperature. There are papers that talk to this but of course that's not a popular topic.
It's sp frustrating lol, but not surprising
anything not anthropogenic is strictly verboten!
Laughable troll parade above. There are dozens of scientific papers and loads of books who deal with the effects of volcanic eruptions on climate.
Now put ur head underground again.
Blah, blah, blah
yeah, didn't he say that the eruption increased the water vapor by 10% for several years (well, for three years now)? Water vapor is by far the strongest contributor to the greenhouse effect (about 95%, isn't it?). So there is a problem in the equation somewhere...
Extremophile archaea found after the eruption also indicates their ubiquity, and helps explain why deep sea vent bacteria are also found in the human microbiome. Another great, real science video production, Anton 👍
Fascinating!
I saw the 'Tonga sunset' here in Kutztown, PA, the result of sulfur particles spreading across earth and through the atmosphere. It was the most beautiful sunset I had ever seen. Every color imaginable. Pinks, purples, oranges, yellows. I took a picture from my window, not realizing at the time that this was what I was witnessing.
Fascinating smoke stack colonisation,thanks
Very interesting video covering lots of aspects. Some of the background footage was from other types of eruptions at other volcanos I noticed.
Do people not realise that water vapor is also a greenhouse gas? If the temperature didn't change due to this, i would be surprised seeing as water vapor is 10% higher for 3 years.
Thanks for this info, I must have had it in the back of my head but forgot about it. I was learning about the weather and local climate affects newly built dams in China were having and I remember being very surprised that the weather got hotter and they actually had less rainfall even though they had this new water mass the was constantly evaporating right next to them.
Now one needs to start thinking, if the oceans are heating up, more water will evaporate and temperatures will go up even faster. Maybe more rainfall in some areas but overall things are getting more hot.
Looking at Los Angeles and the lack of rain they have had now in the rainy season and hell like fires raging right now we are seeing changes that we have not in our lifetime seen before.
I was initially hoping that the Tonga explosion would actually reduce global temperatures by a little for a few years, but seems not enough dust and to much water vapor ??
Learning is such a wonderful thing
Indeed. I thought that water vapour is the most important greenhouse gas of all of them (50% of all greenhouse effect). We were supposed to have an El Niño the year after that eruption, but instead of Sydney being hot and dry, it was wet and humid.
@M3au yeah i was living in sydney and I remember the non stop rain, also drove through the middle of australia and it was not desert but green, when I drive through previously it was red dust
@@solon2923yes, every climate model requires higher water vapor to get the runway doom effect. Every model takes tiny, less effective greenhouse gasses, and uses them to boost water vapor which is what actually causes the heating.
But, all the models forget something ELSE that more water vapor means: more clouds. Clouds reflect sunlight across the full spectrum, so less solar radiance to heat the planet. Also, more water vapor helps plants (as does high CO2, up to about 1500 ppm, and we're under 500 ppm currently...) so more carbon capture. Lastly, more precipitation, so less desertification and fresh water supply, including potentially recharging ground water aquifers (especially with beaver dams and other things to slow water flow down instead of just rushing to the ocean).
It's a lot more able to self balance than climate alarmists give credit.
“Studies” finding no heating effect from 10% more water in the stratosphere are bogus. The global average warmth spike since summer 2023 must be somehow attributed to human activity rather than natural causes.
So pleased to have found your channel again
we had the worst flooding and rain in Australia after that eruption
And California and Nevada had record snowfall.
China Hattie so bad they could not invade Taiwan.
Mountainous regions have it the worst hence fleeting Afghanistan to avoid military protection liabilities.
Great video content, Anton.
Thank you.
1:44 those lightning strikes must have been traveling through the saltwater, man I'd be happy to get a sample to see if it split atoms or some indication of electralysis, since the ash would have also been in contact with the saltwater.
What a journey it’s been learning about this eruption 🌋
fascinating. thank you.
Lightening is interesting to me, it's a deadly beautiful phenomena. By chance could you do a vid on the subject sometime in the future?
Pecos Hank did an excellent explainer you might want to check out.
Thank you Anton , always a great topic , geology tells the story
Humm What this seismic detection brings to mind for me is the bay off of Naples. Whare that caldera (Campi Flegrei caldera), is under the Mediterranean. If that cracks it will launch that entire city in to orbit.
Excellent video, thank you for sharing!
It's Tonga time!
Anton: Tonga time was 3 years ago.
Me: ...oh. That's been awhile. Man. Where does the time go?
Where it began
I appreciate you and your broadcast.
I see you slipped a shot of Yavin 4 in @ 4:12...
I instantly noticed too lol
Or this could be the Mayan Highlands.
@@davidc5191Definitely! After all... they had to film *_somewhere!_* 😊
Absolutely Amazing 🌋🌊🌋
We take satellite views for granted. It's just amazing.
Thanks Anton. I wonder whether it's similar precursor waves which animals feel and react to before eruptions and earthquakes?
That lightning is pretty dangerous in the middle of that huge explosion.
😂 Pyroclastic flows laugh at lightning.
I live in central Queensland Australia and I noticed that in the summer time the temperature only got over 40 degrees C 3 times. We had a mild summer with lots of rain !
No, the heat waves were caused by my 1995 Chevrolet Silverado
More likely global air travel but you're 95 truck helped 😂
3000+ nuclear tests. Blame the layman and his gas stove and mower. Logiccccc
And the damage caused to the ocean floor by that reliable old truck was because of the gross negligence of oil companies, despite what they say about caring about people and the environment.
More than likely… :-)
I think the immediate effects of the HTH eruption put the oil and gas industry to shame.
Beautiful video man! Why wasnt there more footage of this event?
The two main constituents to form natural ozone are sea water and sunlight. Antarctica is naturally low in ozone because of this lack of sunlight and seawater. The ozone hole has always existed as long as continentally Antarctica has been positioned over the South Pole. CFCs are not the reason for the ozone hole.
I believe Dupont's patent on Freon was running out a little before the whole ozone affair blew up.
I'm from Australia and you can still see the haze in the air from the eruption coursing red sunsets and sunrises. the summers here have been slightly colder and wetter since the eruption. maybe the heating affect you were speaking of may start to take affect after the haze causing particles have settled down.
I was a kid when Mt. St. Helen erupted, and it caused cold spells, not warming.
I wonder why they thought a huge plume of ash shading and cooling the ground across entire countries would cause "warming"? 🤔
the superheated water and steam would cause warming
@elk3909 Not for weeks, though.
I live in the Midwest, and the sky looked smokey for weeks from Washington to the Atlantic Ocean. The ash is dense and reflective. So, it reflects and refracts the sunlight so that it can't warm the ground.
It likely affected the entire globe because as areas cool, it draws heat from the surrounding areas, and that sets off storm fronts, triggering a chain event.
Check the weather records. There definitely wasn't any major warming from the steam anywhere but within a few hundred feet from the site, it may have raised the temperature by a degree for a few minutes.
I'm not spouting my own personal theory here. The cooling is a recorded, provable fact
Thank you for this update, Anton.
🙋🏽♀️anton everyday
Absolutely fascinating information I'll have to look up the rest of the videos and get the lowdown on the rest of it
in Perth Australia it rained every time a cloud crossed the coast for 18months and a grey stain was left when it dried
It's been raining every other day in Central Queensland for about 3 years. 😅 I have gotten in the habit to hang my washing up the minute the clouds clear up. Take it down as soon. As they are dry
So much to learn here. More on the lightning / plasma thing please, Anton.
0:15 On that violet simulation of whatever (clouds???) you can see the circular eruption, but there is also another circle, seemingly emerging at the same time. It's right of the eruption.
Does anybody know what that is?
I see it, looks like another eruption miles away doesn't it? I wonder if it's an artifact from combining separate images of the Tonga event?
@@LoganPEade RIGHT?
I was also thinking of another eruption first, but that would be THOUSANDS of miles. And would be a weird coincidence.
Then I thought of a kind of echo or, as you say, an artifact.
I really want to know what it actually is.
@johannageisel5390 Indeed, I wish I knew how to find out exactly but I'm at a loss for now 🤗!
@@johannageisel5390 There were several other active volcanoes erupting along the west coast of South America. It could have been a less violent eruption in Chile or something.
I believe there was a least one intense tropical storm in the vicinity. If you're into the deep dive, I would try to find satellite data for the eruption that lines up with view.
If I remember correctly, at least one storm seemed to intensify when the energy of the eruption hit it. There was so much energy released in the ocean and atmosphere with this eruption.
Central Scotland was hit by an electrical storm in July 1961. 2600 lightning strikes a second in that one if you ask me. 200 years of statically charged industrial pollution in that one. It lasted 30 hours.
Great work Anton! I'm sure the atmospheric rivers were caused by this water vapor in the air condescending and returning to earth.
fantastic video
Goddamnit man
I thought i was first but the P bots spammed even earlier
At the very least they are easy to detect.
Using God's holy Name as a curse word is still forbidden. Be careful.
About the temperature increase...perhaps the amount of water in the atmosphere (greenhouse effect) was offset by the shading of the airborne particulate matter produced by the volcano.
It was so powerful it affected gps satellites, but it didn't really affect the weather. Now consider the Franklin LIP basalt flood eruption turned the whole planet into snowball earth.
it did affect the climate how could it not...
In Australia we were getting ready (or being warned of the worst bushfires ever) for a scorcher, then it rained for a couple of years.
Even a colossal eruption like the Tonga event is a tiny blip compared to the effects of human industry on the climate.
But human industrialisation hasn't been going on for 4.6 billion years; volcanic eruptions, floods, meteorite impacts and anything else you care to imagine, has.
I'll clue you in, that's 4,600,000,000 vs 250 give or take for industrialisation that had to ramp up to noticeable levels.
I'll also counter by saying that the human population should never have been able to grow from around 770m to 8bn, because every one of those people requires Earth's resources. Cause and effect.
@@beedoox5613So... What point are you trying to make? I would tend to agree with the original thought that typical volcanic eruptions, and even large ones like this, do represent only a blip, per se, when compared to the ongoing destruction of the environment that's being wrought by human industrialization.
@@stargazer5784 I don't disagree with the idea that this volcanic eruption could represent a mere blip but I have no way to measure that - and frankly, I don't care either.
If the numbers are to be believed and today our collective emissions are in the region of 100x that of all the volcanic eruptions on Earth - then we should acknowledge it's not been consistently 100x for the entirety of the human industrialisation era, as we started with a fraction of the population and a tiny amount of industrialisation that would likely not even have registered.
On the flip-side, 250 years of so-called industrialisation (if we yield to that time period) doesn't even register vs the age of the Earth, and the fact that it started as an inhospitable molten ball of rock, cooled, warmed cooled, warmed, had ice that covered most of the planet, had high oxygen levels, became saturated with CO2, had a well known medieval warm period, natural forest fires, dealt with continental shift (affecting climate), Earth's position in the solar system and galaxy, Solar cycles etc. etc. All without human industrialisation. The list of data-points is massive and endless!
Now, do think it's shitty that we've cut down so much rain-forest? Yes, and I also think it's shitty that we've allowed the population to explode from 770m to 8bn in such a short amount of time. I also think it's shitty that the big polluters can't capture and store their soot and other pollutants - but the data scientist in me also refuses to believe that in less than 200 years, we've done more damage to the Earth (climate-wise) than it has suffered through all the natural events that have occurred during its 4.6bn years.
nope totally wrong humans have zero affect on climate
@@beedoox5613 true is just does not add up these volcanoes are monstrous
Thanks, really interesting summary
Something is not right here. While CO2 contributes 12% to effective greenhouse gases water vapor contributes 70% of effective green house gases. So a 10 % increase in water vapor would mean a 7% increase in effective greenhouse gases which more than have that of all the CO2 contribution. So how is it possible that the warming effect was so minimal?
Maybe because the greenhouse gas effect is being overstated to impose a new world order??
Amateur Opinion? Phase change of H2O and lack of phase change in gaseous CO2.
hmmm yeah - I'd like to know that as well. And 10% increase in world-wide H2O from a single event - that's huge. Wonder if that's 10% for like a few hours but then drops off quickly due to precipitation. Maybe you need a permanent or at least extended period 10% to have the full effect. It has to be something like that otherwise the values are way off.
@@johnebuckle maybe the greenhouse gas effect is being overstated to sell us things
@@Terran.Marine.2I replied to you but misread your comment completely!! My apologies for what I hope you didn't get to read!
I am soooo glad I live in the middle of England, 120 metres above sea level. 🥳
i live 1.5 meters above sea level i have no worries of sea level rise as there is none
@@bonysminiatures3123 If you're on the East coast of US buy a surf board, just on the off chance that Las Palma decides to collapse. 🌊
If you're on the West coast, do the same, in case the San Andreas unzips.🌊
I jest! Nonetheless, never say "never!" about anything, however remote the chance of it happening might be. It merely temps fate. 😎👍
Note to self, don't buy real estate on volcanic islands - looking at Japan and Singapore..... ooooh boy
Singapore?
Instead buy real estate near sea level, like our masters.
Amazing! Thank you Anton! 🙏
Lighting flashes are connected to the Schumer resonance, I speculate that the avg. vibration of the Schumer will increase in the long run, earth will vibrate higher
And you might have missed the flying saucer behind Hale Bopp..... Now what
@ yesterday I actually saw UAPs for the first time over Jamestown RI with my whole family, around 20 of them.
Please specify about your comment. Did you mean to say something constructive or just tried to bring me down with an insult?
@@MilushevGeorgi Pics or it didn't happen.
Even then, it didn't happen. It never happened, and it will _never_ happen.
@@MilushevGeorgimost UAPs end up being something boring like a plane, drone or satellite. Extra ordinary events require extra ordinary evidence. Did you film it? With something higher than 140p?
Just because you don’t understand what they are, does not mean they are UAP’s.
If you have evidence I would get in contact with your local observatory to discuss possibilities, or an astrophysicist
@@tomp.55 1973 November, Chapman Road, New Hartford, Oneida County, New York my high school best friend and I were heading west in a car around 10 PM. An object overhead trailing light streaked across the sky heading south west, ricocheted/angled -45 degrees to the north, angled -45 degrees again to the south west, then split in two at 90 degree angle and disappeared over the tree line of the opposite side of the valley horizon. The entire time it was visible was about 3 seconds.
What would contacting my local observatory to discuss possibilities or an astrophysicist add to the observation?
Too bad he avoided talking about the volcano dramatically affected weather patterns. It didn’t affected temperatures but it did affected weather patterns. Like how 2021 had the most rain for Australia and California. And as of 2024/2025 Pacific Northwest is supposed to be having a La Niña winter but ended up getting a mild winter.
Because it is unknowable!
We can postulate it had an effect, but not what it was! Weather is far to complex!
That might be a result of general climate change also
@@mickrivard8344 you do historically that the earth nearly had glaciers near the equator millions years ago is one of our great die offs to. Also was a lot warmer during the age of the dinosaurs. The earth has ways off changing its own weather patterns that humans can’t control we are just a long for the ride.
I would like to point at there was a beach in Australia that people said it would be under water in 100 years. Guess what the beach is still there the water levels hasn’t changed yet. Yes I know we are flooding but the reason why we are flooding in costal areas is because we are affecting the local area that makes flooding worse. Like dredging a coastal river to allow bigger ships to navigate which in effect has more tidal flooding do the increase of water from the deeper river.
Yep, man made climate change is a hoax. Got it.
@@mickrivard8344 yes the climate is always changing
0:15 in the video. Clear expanding shock wave around the volcano. Bottom left. But closer to the center of the image there's another expanding circle. Go on a bit, at 0:18, a second starts. Far left, just below center, there's a circle there too.
What causes those?