West coast player ran completely out of bounds and went on to score a goal. Todd Marshall managed to hit the exact top of the goal post Couple Farrell long bombs in that game too Did you forget about that game? Haha
boundary umpire had a throw recalled and then did a similar shit throw that was just called play on, 5 seconds later another throw in was called and the other boundary umpire came to throw it 😅 Also there was a mark about 55m from Ports goal that was questionably 50, depending who you go for, but when the ump said "no" he handballed it to Farrel and he bombed a goal from 60, but the umpire called it back for some reason and it resulted in a behind instead
Bull, you missed the Port vs West Coast game where a West Coast player clearly went out of bounds in the forward 50, yet faced no umpire call then proceeded to kick to his mate for a goal.
5:44 that's not holding the ball, the player has not had any prior opportunity, and the ball was knocked away in the tackle while the player was trying to dispose of the ball legitimately. If the player has taken any steps, or broken a tackle prior, then they've had prior opportunity, making it dropping the ball.
Im with you on the flop, they really should be more aware of them. Us aussies pride ourselves on not being like soccer where they flop all the time. Stamp that shit out and award a free kick. Bull
Not sure why Rowbottom’s run down of DeGoey wasn’t mentioned clear missed HtB. At the game Rowbottom acted on the umpires call, which was too quick but it was a reaction to the call.
4:13 Should the umpire have signaled time-on? Historically I feel when players lined up for goal, umpires would blow the whistle to stop the clock to prevent time wasting, and blow time back on just before the kick is taken.
appreciate you calling out the maynard deliberate rushed behind thing not being called considering it was identical to what broad did last week yet broad was pinged. it’s never paid and it’s clear the umps haven’t decided to be more strict on it so the only difference i can spot is the yellow and black on the guernsey 🤷♂️ also that mansell miss is still gut wrenching 😭😭😭
From the rules (p.g. 55): "18.11.2 Free Kicks - Deliberate Rushed Behinds A field Umpire shall award a Free Kick against a Player from the Defending Team who intentionally Kicks, Handballs or forces the football over the Attacking Team’s Goal Line or Behind Line or onto one of the Attacking Team’s Goal Posts, and the Player: (a) is greater than nine metres from the Goal Line or Behind Line" The goal square extends 9m from the goal line and Maynard was in the goal square when he rushed it. Last week was the wrong call.
good vid mate, there was a tackle on nick daicos by ollie florent and he through his head backwards into his lap after hed been taken to ground and it was called a high tackle, should that along with the sicily flop cop a fine?
Mitch Owens is a great kick for goal on the run, not too sure about his set shot though so hopefully the Saints give him more time in the middle where he does his best work
1:23 Definitely not a holding the -bull- .. ball. 5:47 whereas this is _definitely_ -bull- .. ball. Your call on Sicily is bullseye. Vlastuin came at Curnow like a bullock! 😁👍🏻
@@angusferguson1070 If the player didn't have prior and made a legal attempt to dispose the ball then it's not HTB. Regardless of if they legally dispose of it or not.
@@chadchadderton I was there, they had plenty of time and also tried to take on tacklers, I’ve been playing since I was 6 you don’t have to tell me the rules
@@angusferguson1070 Considering you are still a preteen the fact that you've been "playing since you were 6" isn't relevant at all. Clearly I do need to tell you the rules because you simply don't understand them.
5:45 not how holding the ball works. Check the rule book If he has no prior and makes a genuine attempt to dispose, it's not HTB. Whether he legally disposes or not. Way too many people who don't understand this rule and complain about calls or non-calls that are 100% correct
Yeah as a Cats fan on the night I thought it was HTB, but you've summed it up perfectly, geniune attempt by dropping it for a kick (he just got tackled as he got kicked) so it's not HTB
hundred percent correct here, i hear so many calls for HTB when I’m watching and theyre more or less like this, and when it doesnt get pinged (as it shouldnt) people are outraged
@@goldcoastsuns877 i think they need prior opportunity to get rid of it, as i guess if a person gets the ball and instantly tries to throw it on boot, but get tackled, theres not much else they couldve done, as the moment they had an opportunity to get rid of it, they actually tried to
The problem with the 50m penalty now is it's completely disproportionate to the crime being committed. Situations like 4:10 where players are unfairly punished for barely even minor infractions and are given no opportunity to remedy their action. It happens at least once a game and more often than not gifts a team with a free goal and it's makes this great game look amateur. Solution: Remove the 'stand' rule and go back to what worked for, well, forever since the 50m penalty was introduced. Either that or reduce it to 25m because it's simply too punitive for the infraction it is.
I actually reckon that the stand rule is great... makes heaps of sense and IMO simplifies what was unnecessarily intricate. Also the 50m should be a tough penalty, I don't reckon that 25m is tough enough. Although I do agree their application of the 50m penalties isn't consistent or accurate enough
Yet he threw it into the middle of the ground rather than to the boundary...? good attempt trying to cover for him I guess? Also as Mr Holding-the-Bull points out Myers should know that it's a penalty for throwing away other player's possessions, we saw it heaps last year with trackers, goggles and even boots if I remember correctly
1:20 absolute **bull** sh- not only was it not a 50m penalty, it wasn't a freekick, mark but instead a freekick for the other team. We need AI for umpires ngl
Surprised the free kick to Dangerfield when he dug his knees into Stocker wasn't mentioned. Stocker was clearly fighting to be first to the ball and didn't have any intention to specifically take out the legs, which is why the rule exists. Even the commentators thought the free was going the other way.
You didnt mention any, but all the free kicks paid against the D's, were utter BULLsh1t....... ( if you want to get to 10K quicker, than the other bloke.... do a "name and shame", where you call out all the players faking, and dirty tactics !!!! It will catch on .....)
A flop should get you 12 weeks out of the game without pay to think about whether you want to play footy, or go be an extra on home and away. Pathetic. Fine the coaches until it stops happening, they won't pick a fairy who flops if it comes out of their pocket
![State of Play | September 24, 2024 [ENGLISH]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/fVs0suPHAX8/mqdefault.jpg)
West coast player ran completely out of bounds and went on to score a goal.
Todd Marshall managed to hit the exact top of the goal post
Couple Farrell long bombs in that game too
Did you forget about that game? Haha
he's a crows fan what'd ya expect really
boundary umpire had a throw recalled and then did a similar shit throw that was just called play on, 5 seconds later another throw in was called and the other boundary umpire came to throw it 😅 Also there was a mark about 55m from Ports goal that was questionably 50, depending who you go for, but when the ump said "no" he handballed it to Farrel and he bombed a goal from 60, but the umpire called it back for some reason and it resulted in a behind instead
I was driving home from Adelaide so didn't get a chance to watch much of the port game. I had to listen on the radio.
so funny when the richmond bloke kicked the bull into the post from five out
Cripps just out here casually breaking the half marathon world record
and that's no joke
Bull, you missed the Port vs West Coast game where a West Coast player clearly went out of bounds in the forward 50, yet faced no umpire call then proceeded to kick to his mate for a goal.
Yeah I was hoping that would come up as well, the ball was about a metre out 🤯
5:44 wasn't a "missed" call, it simply isn't HTB as per footy laws.
exactly, tried to get rid of it as soon as he got it
Yeah exactly, no prior opportunity, genuine attempt to get rid of the ball, play on
@@ajexxan3415yeah it’s really concerning how many people don’t know this rule.
@@samysull333 been an umpire for 9 years including state league level and no matter where you go people will scream “ball” any chance they get
@@ajexxan3415 no a lot of people just don’t know the rule
5:44 that's not holding the ball, the player has not had any prior opportunity, and the ball was knocked away in the tackle while the player was trying to dispose of the ball legitimately.
If the player has taken any steps, or broken a tackle prior, then they've had prior opportunity, making it dropping the ball.
Bro next weeks episode will be nuts haha. The Pies/Saints game alone has umps, out of bounds and a falcon. Love seeing pies lose
Egg footy vs holding the bull lets goooo. BULL
Im with you on the flop, they really should be more aware of them. Us aussies pride ourselves on not being like soccer where they flop all the time. Stamp that shit out and award a free kick. Bull
Not sure why Rowbottom’s run down of DeGoey wasn’t mentioned clear missed HtB.
At the game Rowbottom acted on the umpires call, which was too quick but it was a reaction to the call.
where are the clips from dees vs dogs? i mean surely there was at least 1 thing odd that happened in the game
LETS GOOO, I missed this content so much I’m so happy AFL is back
4:13 Should the umpire have signaled time-on? Historically I feel when players lined up for goal, umpires would blow the whistle to stop the clock to prevent time wasting, and blow time back on just before the kick is taken.
8:29 i was at that game and short not only kicked the bull from 60 but against the wind
I’m shocked how little hawks clips there are, this is Bull
Bull:) Great vid mate. Go Dons! 🎉
Hey man great stuff love seeing you and you quality grow keep up the good work
bull
9:05 the marker, Crazy your doing my boy george like that
Bro I remember when me and my brother st the start of this series would binge him and would die because we had to wait a week😂 (Pin)❤
appreciate you calling out the maynard deliberate rushed behind thing not being called considering it was identical to what broad did last week yet broad was pinged. it’s never paid and it’s clear the umps haven’t decided to be more strict on it so the only difference i can spot is the yellow and black on the guernsey 🤷♂️ also that mansell miss is still gut wrenching 😭😭😭
From the rules (p.g. 55):
"18.11.2 Free Kicks - Deliberate Rushed Behinds
A field Umpire shall award a Free Kick against a Player from the Defending Team who
intentionally Kicks, Handballs or forces the football over the Attacking Team’s Goal Line
or Behind Line or onto one of the Attacking Team’s Goal Posts, and the Player:
(a) is greater than nine metres from the Goal Line or Behind Line"
The goal square extends 9m from the goal line and Maynard was in the goal square when he rushed it.
Last week was the wrong call.
@@yar1that’s not how it works but i agree it was definitely the wrong call with broad and the right call with maynard.
Maybe do your footy tips next week for some extra content
Bull ❤
*biggest falcon youve ever seen till the st.kilda collingwood game lol
Did you see D'goey clap at Ash Johnson when he shanked it? Funny as
good vid mate, there was a tackle on nick daicos by ollie florent and he through his head backwards into his lap after hed been taken to ground and it was called a high tackle, should that along with the sicily flop cop a fine?
these calls had some bulls angry
that 50m call on Baker was pretty bull in my opinion
10:00 probably not a 50 as it's in the middle of play, where it could be considered a hazard. Also I believe it was Charlie Cameron, no?
You're allowed to drop the ball of you're in the middle of kicking it. Umpire changed that rule about 4 years ago.
the one with markov was play on because it was touched
Last week, the player had the ball outside the square. This one with Maynard was in the square.
Still should have been paid deliberate under the current laws of the sport... weird decision.
That Brisbane goal call was bull!
Sicily looks like he is turning into a bull
a kick is a kick suspension should not have been overturned
Did you miss the port vs eagles game cause there where quite a few "interesting" calls to say the least
rowan marshall was not holding the ball. might want to learn the rules on that one
all these players really grabbed the bull by the horns this week
Pies v swans should have been better I’d rather watch a bull meow
You’re way better than egg footy ball!!
the oleg one is crazy
Mitch Owens is a great kick for goal on the run, not too sure about his set shot though so hopefully the Saints give him more time in the middle where he does his best work
Did you forget Port played? Blatant Crows bias
Curnow messed with the bull and copped the horns.
The lions losing was bull
BULLLLL
Did anyone watch Melbourne dogs play 8 score reviews only two changed anything and only 4 were needed there also five in the FIRST QUARTER WTF
You got this BULL you can get to ten thousand before eggfooty
I like footbull
BALL
Bull. Love these videos keep it up
Should of been holding the bull
bull
Bull😂
BULL
Bull!
Bull
This video is BULL! jk great stuff
ball
1:23 Definitely not a holding the -bull- .. ball.
5:47 whereas this is _definitely_ -bull- .. ball.
Your call on Sicily is bullseye.
Vlastuin came at Curnow like a bullock! 😁👍🏻
Good vid
Bulls
port v west cost !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You missed all the dropping the balls that the umpires didn’t pay to hawthorn, like blatant ones
He didn't miss anything, there is no "dropping the ball" law in our sport... hence why they weren't paid.
@@chadchadderton holding the ball then
@@angusferguson1070 If the player didn't have prior and made a legal attempt to dispose the ball then it's not HTB. Regardless of if they legally dispose of it or not.
@@chadchadderton I was there, they had plenty of time and also tried to take on tacklers, I’ve been playing since I was 6 you don’t have to tell me the rules
@@angusferguson1070 Considering you are still a preteen the fact that you've been "playing since you were 6" isn't relevant at all.
Clearly I do need to tell you the rules because you simply don't understand them.
I will head over and unsub from Egg Footy 🫡
Man some of these calls were really bullheaded on behalf of the umpires
Do u mean bullshit
LETS GOOO, I missed this content so much I’m so happy AFL is back
So glad you're back too!
Bull
ball
bull
5:45 not how holding the ball works. Check the rule book
If he has no prior and makes a genuine attempt to dispose, it's not HTB. Whether he legally disposes or not.
Way too many people who don't understand this rule and complain about calls or non-calls that are 100% correct
Yeah as a Cats fan on the night I thought it was HTB, but you've summed it up perfectly, geniune attempt by dropping it for a kick (he just got tackled as he got kicked) so it's not HTB
hundred percent correct here, i hear so many calls for HTB when I’m watching and theyre more or less like this, and when it doesnt get pinged (as it shouldnt) people are outraged
If the free kick was given though, wouldent it be for incorrect disposal, not HTB
@@goldcoastsuns877 i think they need prior opportunity to get rid of it, as i guess if a person gets the ball and instantly tries to throw it on boot, but get tackled, theres not much else they couldve done, as the moment they had an opportunity to get rid of it, they actually tried to
@@isaacmadhwan445 yeah true thanks
Bull❤
What’s your favourite animal?? Mine would have to be a bull
Ball I watched the end up the bangers
The problem with the 50m penalty now is it's completely disproportionate to the crime being committed. Situations like 4:10 where players are unfairly punished for barely even minor infractions and are given no opportunity to remedy their action. It happens at least once a game and more often than not gifts a team with a free goal and it's makes this great game look amateur.
Solution: Remove the 'stand' rule and go back to what worked for, well, forever since the 50m penalty was introduced. Either that or reduce it to 25m because it's simply too punitive for the infraction it is.
also, BULL
I actually reckon that the stand rule is great... makes heaps of sense and IMO simplifies what was unnecessarily intricate. Also the 50m should be a tough penalty, I don't reckon that 25m is tough enough.
Although I do agree their application of the 50m penalties isn't consistent or accurate enough
Bring back the 15 metre penalty for small infringements…
Grian Myers threw away the boot because it was an obstruction and a hazard.
Yet he threw it into the middle of the ground rather than to the boundary...? good attempt trying to cover for him I guess? Also as Mr Holding-the-Bull points out Myers should know that it's a penalty for throwing away other player's possessions, we saw it heaps last year with trackers, goggles and even boots if I remember correctly
Yeah fair enough@@reubengammon9937 👍
Bull
Bull
1:20 absolute **bull** sh- not only was it not a 50m penalty, it wasn't a freekick, mark but instead a freekick for the other team. We need AI for umpires ngl
Surprised the free kick to Dangerfield when he dug his knees into Stocker wasn't mentioned. Stocker was clearly fighting to be first to the ball and didn't have any intention to specifically take out the legs, which is why the rule exists. Even the commentators thought the free was going the other way.
@@TomMarvan cry more 🤣
Bull! Absolutely love watching your videos, keep up the great work!!
im exited to see luke pedlar play this season, he is an absolute bull
Bull :D Great content, as someone from the UK that just discovered Footy, I'm loving it!
You didnt mention any, but all the free kicks paid against the D's, were utter BULLsh1t.......
( if you want to get to 10K quicker, than the other bloke.... do a "name and shame", where you call out all the players faking, and dirty tactics !!!! It will catch on .....)
A flop should get you 12 weeks out of the game without pay to think about whether you want to play footy, or go be an extra on home and away. Pathetic. Fine the coaches until it stops happening, they won't pick a fairy who flops if it comes out of their pocket
My 3rd wife reckons the Markov call was because it was touched off the boot, on the previous kick.
GC absolutely bullied the crows until the 4th quarter! thats my oddity for this week.
in sicily's defence how would you like to be harassed by the whole essendon foward line
Bull !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
the rule should be that you have to mark it one handed off the flying fox camera
Bull
Bont is the bull for the dogs
I love it when Collingwood goes Owen 3 and always miss the BULL
i think this is such a good video should they get a new bull
Idk how how the Tiges lost that game, absolute bull
I wish that Richmond are first not 18
Who is everyone favourite Ball magnet?
I just subbed to both you and egg on the same day lol
Jayden short is my cousin
Bull :D new sub !
bull
I like Holding the Bull