If I'm not mistaken, Robert Parish's RC was 1977-1978. He was with the Golden State Warriors. The 81-82 set was a good bit more "traditional" than the 81-81 set. The only thing out of the ordinary that I can think of in the 81-82 set is that it had East and West packs. Looks like your are East packs from what you pulled.
Packs were made, This year was issued by region,East,Mid West,West,you had cards from more than one region in the same pack, that isnt possible they were not issued that way.
@@robgrogg2546 the cards that are regional have it marked with the card number.cards 1-66 are national and have no east,mid west or west with the number,regional cards are 67-110 for each region. so there are 3 variations ie 67 east 67 mid west 67 west.
What is the biggest red flag for a 're pack'...I have bought packs that was 40 years old and could have swore under closer inspection after i got them home that they were re packed because of how the wax wrapper was stuck on itself on the backs,but then i would open them and pull a nice rookie or 2nd year card. 🤷♂️
@@robgrogg2546 Yes i see what you mean. I'm a big hockey fan,and i opened a pack of 1980 Topps NHL cards. I was hoping to get a RAY BOURQUE rookie. Long story short,i had suspected the pack was re-heated and re packaged because i could see a thumb print on the back of the pack after i opened it...anyway i got down to the very last card in the pack (which was the card that touched the bubble gum) and it turned out to be a RAY BOURQUE rookie. It also had no gum mark on the back of the card at all. I'm not sure what this story proves or disproves,but just wanted to share my experience from that particular time. I would think if it was re packaged,no way would they include a star rookie from a hall of famer in it. 🤷♂️
@@dwade6322 I think one of the biggest hints is the glue. Wax packs that old should be barely held together, instead of the glue still being so strong that you have to literally rip it.
Wasn't too crazy at all i think was still worth it to see these old vintage cards thanks for sharing
If I'm not mistaken, Robert Parish's RC was 1977-1978. He was with the Golden State Warriors.
The 81-82 set was a good bit more "traditional" than the 81-81 set. The only thing out of the ordinary that I can think of in the 81-82 set is that it had East and West packs. Looks like your are East packs from what you pulled.
George Maginnis is a good one in that group also.
Marques (markus) johnson was a star. From UCLA
And “White men can’t jump “. 😂
One of my all time favorite Bulls Artis Gilmore plus a fun guy to watch Chocolate thunder R.I.P
I love the Artis Gilmore.
Dug it... thanks for the show!
No stars in the first pack? You pulled five cards featuring Hall of Famers.
I thought that afterwards to. I was hoping for a Bird or Magic. Lol
Cool video!
Packs were made, This year was issued by region,East,Mid West,West,you had cards from more than one region in the same pack, that isnt possible they were not issued that way.
I came across that in my research after making the video. I couldn't find a list of what cards were distributed in what region.
@@robgrogg2546 the cards that are regional have it marked with the card number.cards 1-66 are national and have no east,mid west or west with the number,regional cards are 67-110 for each region. so there are 3 variations ie 67 east 67 mid west 67 west.
Great cards and video, keep up the excellent work and content.
What did you give for the packs
They were part of a larger lot that I paid 115 for. It had about 50 packs in itm
Well I like theme cool old cards I got some old cards of pistol pete. Jamie 😊
Thanks! I prefer opening the older stuff.
@robgrogg2546 who's your favorite player
Clemente that's who I'm named after. Then George Brett.
Yes. But seems like a repack. 40 year old packs shouldn’t open like that.
Was my thought as well. Came in a lot of late 80s packs. So if it was opened I'm thinking it was opened then.
What is the biggest red flag for a 're pack'...I have bought packs that was 40 years old and could have swore under closer inspection after i got them home that they were re packed because of how the wax wrapper was stuck on itself on the backs,but then i would open them and pull a nice rookie or 2nd year card. 🤷♂️
The second pack should have opened smoother, and there was no gum marks on the back card. I'm no expert just my thoughts from opening then.
@@robgrogg2546 Yes i see what you mean. I'm a big hockey fan,and i opened a pack of 1980 Topps NHL cards. I was hoping to get a RAY BOURQUE rookie. Long story short,i had suspected the pack was re-heated and re packaged because i could see a thumb print on the back of the pack after i opened it...anyway i got down to the very last card in the pack (which was the card that touched the bubble gum) and it turned out to be a RAY BOURQUE rookie. It also had no gum mark on the back of the card at all. I'm not sure what this story proves or disproves,but just wanted to share my experience from that particular time. I would think if it was re packaged,no way would they include a star rookie from a hall of famer in it. 🤷♂️
@@dwade6322 I think one of the biggest hints is the glue. Wax packs that old should be barely held together, instead of the glue still being so strong that you have to literally rip it.
Those pack are fake, I don’t even want to watch the rest.
Phirst!!
I stop watching when you can't pronounce a name correct
Thanks for watching what you do. I do my best.
You'll be missed