Hey Rob! I'm a long time member and subscriber with my personal account. First of all, I have huge respect for you as a scientist and inventor. You inspired me to take a course in standard electrical engineering and in part to start my RUclips channel. I also have relied on your skeptical open mind as a gate keeper for ideas in this field many times. But you've got a number of things either incorrect or just out of context in the video. I'm going to try and do a respectful response video in a few weeks based on the historical evidence in plasma physics for what is going on and the current trials from independents. I'll also explain my understanding of the differences with the GEET. There are similarities but they are showing different results and have some key differences. If I can swing it, I'll encourage Malcolm to send you a prototype to review yourself in the near future. The first 25 preproduction experimental units are going out to research teams ATM but I expect there will be more soon. Cheers!
You've shown your hand as not independent by saying "If I can swing it, I'll encourage Malcolm to send you a prototype to review yourself in the near future".
IT WORKS! Plasmoid unification Theory connected with sacred numbers that are everywhere in our religions & the pyramid microwave device! ALL right before our EYES DELIBERATELY HIDDEN! we CAN'T CONTINUE! IM UNSUBSCRIBING FROM UR PROPAGANDA channel
@@ESS284what? Shown your hand? It's an open to all collaborative to develop the technology for all to benefit. They talk together and so he could ask malcom.
I made a geek generator for my B&S 3.5hp motor.... it ran on 50/50 water and gasoline after being started on 100% gasoline and warmed up..... the geek generator works, I ran it on water and oil with gasoline mixed in for good measure ( the gas makes it easier to start) I am not really sure that the device splits the water molecules or not or just uses the water as steam in the cylinder.... i suspect the latter.... but it did run on a 50/50 mixture of gas and water.... where it normally would not it took the exhaust heated cylinder to work... it was a extremely interesting experiment but I never did anything with the set up as it took alot of fiddling to get it to run initially. I also tried a water injection system in my Ford Pinto.... it went through about 1 gallon of water per tank full of gas..... it made the engine run better and the car felt more responsive. I ran it for about 6~8 months till the big mason jar froze and broke the jar.... then I took it off. i did not notice any gas milage improvement at all, in fact I think it went down a small amount but when I took the head off everything inside looked like it had been sandblasted clean no carbon anywhere even the pistons were shiny ! ..... so it is a great thing to do before a overhaul !
My uncle made one in school during the early 80's, it was so efficient the motor would freeze up and stop working. He says random people will still ask him about it 40 years later, it's still laying around his shop to this day.
You should have used a metal gallon can instead of a glass jar. AND added anti freeze in the winter. That will burn like any other liquid according to Pantone.
@ThinkingandTinkering You're not wrong there. He said himself he doesn't know much about it and needs a few months for research. I know magnitudes less than anyone about the subject, but I like to think I would research beforehand 🤔 Let's hope he focuses on his sacred geometry, through which he inspired many. Much like, unbeknownst to you, you have sparked a strong flame within me to pick up electronics again. Stayed up all night 2 weeks ago binge watching all your videos I deemed most relevant to me at this time haha. (I even joined brilliant to learn) Cheers Rob 🍻
@@ThinkingandTinkeringthe whole thing stinks. I love a conspiracy or I wouldn't be sniffing around this ARC rubbish, but me has a feeling Bendall and some of his associates might be "intentionally" leading people astray, as a career, as it were.
My god! This has taken me back 35 years. I remember trying out water injection on my Kawasaki Z650. Using hypodermic needles inserted into each inlet collar. The thing sucked in nearly a pint of water in about 30 seconds. I was lucky I didn't hydro-lock a cylinder or two. Left the idea for another day and never bothered going back to it.
The water never enters the engine with this device, there are no moving parts, it simply uses cold air entering one end and warm air entering the other to generate plasmoids in the water as the exhaust goes through it and the plasmoids convert the gases into oxygen
I think there are a lot of people who had an idea or a feeling there was something there, and even in fruition, it is a simple form that is counterintuitive to our current models. Deprogramming is hard lol
@@lmnow there have been countless prototypes built. The Independent science group MFMP has verified that it works as stated. Scoff at it at your own peril. People need to stop thinking these content creators are any more than just content creators.
Because it'd be proven wrong you can't have him doing that now can you improving to the world that we've been denied free energy for hundreds of years so the elites can use this for themselves and our peril this is a classic example of gatekeeping 0:01
For what it's worth. I recall that the Geet engine had the exhaust tube magnetized in one direction then the intake tube inside it is magnetized the other direction and finally the rod inside it is opposing the intake magnetically. He had different rods that would work better for different fuels. Like I said, for what it's worth. Great job again, Rob. Thanks for breaking it down. Cheers mate!
Ohhhh i get it. Guy builds/does something that could positively change our lives,n he ends up prosecuted & branded crazy 🤯 Reminds you of anything or snuone today 🤔
no one is saying that the technology is fake. but is it 1. reliable 2. efficient 3. safe 4. scalable? a good idea is a good idea. oil companies don't give a damn about this, every single thing in our lives is dependent on oil. if it works then it will become a thing. since it hasn't maybe it needs more work. there are hundreds of countries that would use the tech if it worked, but obviously it doesn't at scale. yet!
In 2015 I built the Geet device. Works great as long as the load is about 70% or more. A loaded generator @ 80% power constantly is a fantastic candidate for the application. It will burn almost anything as long as the reactor rod is tuned to the fuel. Oil needs a longer reactor rod while hydrogen needs a much shorter one. The reactor rod must be trained... When I was racing, we employed a process to hydrogenate the engine blocks. It took about a month to hydrogenate an aluminum block and about 4 months to hydrogenate an Iron block. Bottom line... ionic treatment with racing has been around for centuries. Most haven't a clue as to how or why. The bottom, bottom line is creating a battery in plain sight to prime nitrogen to release its force. Been there done that got that T shirt. That and a dollar will buy a cup of coffee. There is no free energy! It takes time and preparation for comparison to produce a very short show! Not meant for the long haul. Long haul in my book is 1,000,000 miles/1,609,344 Km while the impressive short haul is 500 miles. A demonstration of 5,000 miles is a drop in the bucket however will miss the mark of the long haul. Currently I'm focused on graphene & selenium/sulfur bipolar batteries. We are on the leading edge of EV batteries that charge very quickly however the cycle times keeps diminishing. It's hard work to keep a golf cart running for years compared to keeping a diesel, petrol, propane or natural gas-powered vehicles running. I talked to my Amazon driver today who is averaging 160 stops a day. He loves his new EV delivery truck and reports that he is able to make a 12-hour run. I'll keep you posted on what he says next year.
The whole apparent transmuting elements thing was actually a huge eyebrow raiser for myself. I had several livestreams from several semi related people pop up in my feed, as well as people directly involved. Made mention that it looked like a fancy heat exchanger, and actually raised the whole transmuting stuff as a concern which funny enough was never addressed. "So uh, where is the carbon going buddies?"
Lol,the carbon ass you ask the buddies ,is being systematicly seperated and auctioned of into new atomic elements to the highest bidder buddy!, and the quarks mewons and newons from sed processes are instigating furthete frequency atomic de and reconstruction of thete own knumbnutsss!! Sorry not sorry!
dont really believe it (probably should have said cocked a brow), I'm really skeptical of a lot of their claims @@ThinkingandTinkering Particularly their claim about magically making half the stuff going into the engine disappear into thin air.
This is open source. Don’t go talking about money, motivating Malcolm. He made it open source. You are pissing me off. Are you really so quick to bash on this technology given the possibilities if it actually works. Think about it. If it actually works, we will be living in a new world. Do you really wanna act like a fact checker and squelch this before it gets a chance to anchor. Do you really want to cast aspersions about financial aspirations of the creator when he’s made it open source. Your skepticism feels like it’s born of intellectual rigidity and general ignorance.
@bruceames9224 Don't worry about saving the world with this contraption. Radioactivity from the huge releases from Fukushima and a lesser extent chernobyl, and the million tons dumped into the oceans during bomb development, cannot be denied. Humanity has cut its own throat, and the millions of species trapped here in our thin biosphere are dying rapidly from our insane playing with technologies that we cannot control, let alone understand. Radioactive substances cannot be made stable, and the laws of physics cannot be denied. It looks like electricity supplied to the water is causing the hydrolysis and the hydrogen is being recombined with oxygen somehow torn away from the carbon dioxide. Given that we cannot pick up atoms of plutonium that were blasted out of the Fukushima reactors and scattered world wide, we will never be able to stop the slow destruction of our circle of life. The plankton are gone missing from the pacific, killed by the fallout! This is why CO2 levels are rising, there is no mechanism for the co2 to be broken down! And the radioactive materials are still splitting atoms, releasing huge energies as waste heat, for the next million years or more! So thinking that this silly gismo can save us is beyond sane. The amount of radioactive decay heat is enough just in the fuel pools alone to cook the planet, and the radioactivity only increases and spreads, causing normal matter to decay and become radioactive, the reason they spoke of it as the ATOMIC PLAGUE in the 1950's, when it was discovered! So we have cooked our own goose, and the artificial intelligence can see no farther than we can! And certainly if we can't explain it, than it does not exist.
@@fatTony666 Because the largest Oil Company controls the majority of the stock holdings as well as appoints only their own people to be in charge of those auto companies so as to maintain the status quo of all locomotion will be fueled by the OIL INDUSTRY and NO outside sources will be allowed to interfere with that MONOPOLY ! That is how John D. Rockefeller became the KING of OIL and it's been that way ever since!
@@fatTony666 thats so naive my friend. Why are there wars? why did wall st get a bail out? do you think we live on planet sunshine and roses? be for real.
My understanding is that Malcom was smeared by Shell oil over a prospecting dispute. Also, the darn thing is transmuting elements, and that has been tested and proven.
It baffles me how this channel has went out of its way to make so many interesting little things that in some cases have potential and in others not so much. Yet when it comes to a device that seems to have heavy backing and has been tested and proven to work by actual scientists and engineers that this man discredits it outright without attempting it himself. I find it a bit unusual and out of character for someone who appears to care. Anyway its a much better practice (not to mention more HONEST) to first attempt something before disproving it, otherwise its just more empty words and disinformation.
the channel did none of those things he spoke with respect and gave us layman a thing to ponder, unlike you we have common sense. always question never settle@@OulChap
@@Toxic-nx6im this video was obviously created without the intent to back up what was said (empty words and disinformation). Saying he spoke with respect doesn't change the fact that the video exists, which in itself is fairly disrespectful. If this video had shown at a minimum an attempt to at least try the same or even a half assed attempt to debunk said system then the layman would be left with a thing or two to ponder. Then, and only then would it have been worth while watching. As per your previous response, I think your group needs to re-visit your definition of common sense as you are not getting that one right either. The only good point you raised in your highlighted reply was to "always question never settle", I have to admit it gave me a bit of a laugh as that's exactly what I've done regarding this video, yet you failed to even realise the same waffle you are dishing out. I suspect your comment was written as a blind reaction to my previous one without actually giving it any thought, either way my point still stands. I've been as fair with my comments as I possibly can be so you can either accept it for what it is or don't, either way I'll not lose any sleep over it.
Where has this even been proved as functional from any independent and correctly done study? It had been cool if it had worked, but still there are no objective proof whatsoever i could find.
Did this guy completely spin the whole planet or just the part he is standing on in the first :30? Geet's device and the Thunderstorm generator are not the same thing. Hit Piece much? There should be a prize for being the humanity changer hitman video winner.
Malcom has said that he built base on the research of others. And he said the dimension are critical and base on the the Golden ratio. It very interesting. Thanks
I was thinking it would be a video about Kelvin Thunderstorm (water dropper). Which is an extremely simple device with no moving parts that generates electricity. The models on the internet are huge and take up a lot of space, but in reality the Kelvin Thunderstorm can be miniaturized because it seems that the amount of energy generated is not linked to the size of the device but rather the amount of water that passes through it. Miniaturizing them and connecting them in series would be a fascinating video/experiment! (note, if you are going to try this, do it with extreme caution, the amount of energy generated by this device can easily be lethal)
Why does everyone try and promote their friends idea. Ohh I thought that this was my friends invention that kinda works exactly like that. No... No it doesn't work like this. This is plasmoid technology
The main difference between the GEET is that the GEET processes the fuel and takes in the exhaust gases. The Thunderstorm generator does nothing to the fuel, only processes the air, no exhaust gasses are mixed in. Whether either produces plasmoids at such low pressure and under the stated conditions is really the question. Interestingly, if ultrasonic frequencies are present, then you can create plasmoids (put Al foil in an ultrasonic bath, run it for 60 seconds, and look at the foil under a microscope, and you will see effects on the foil, that quite frankly, are very odd. The foil is subjected to extreme cavitation and, some experimenters are looking at the foil under SEM only to find elements that were not present in the foil nor the water.
All that needs to happen for dismissal is for the skeptics to prove it is producing co2 and not nitrogen and oxygen like they claim. Seems like an easy test
Al foil degrades in water due to it reacting to it, producing Co2. The ultrasonic frequency is probably just speeding up that process like a catalyst through very rapid agitation.
@@maximosh Yes, it will react will dissolved O2, but observation of the reactant products should be purely Al2O3, not Carbon, Calcium, Silicon, Zn, Fe, Mg, Cl from DI water. The controls of both the water w/no Al sheet in one bath run, and the Al sheet from same run (w/o no ultrasound) doesn't indicate the contaminants in the metal itself. Vortical patterns abound and these elements only appear at the vortex points (one up and one down - always in pairs), nowhere else. High magnification indicates structures form inside the vortices seem to create lots of carbon (on outies - counter clockwise) and calcium (on innies - clockwise). Using other metal foils do similar things but the ratios are different. Perhaps the carbon is potentially from dissolved CO2, but only shows up in structures ("ejecta" from the foil itself) on the SEM - nowhere else (you should see it all over the place). The underlying patterns don't appear to line up with what you would expect an ultrasonic bath standing waves, either. I believe it's more than simple dissociation and O2+Al reaction. It's really interesting! I need to reproduce it myself and get my hands on an ICP and confirm the SEM data.
@@maximosh unlike say steel, alu has no fatigue limit... Meaning everytime it is exposed to a stress cycle it gets a tiny bit weaker. ultrasonic waves flex parts. Often with effects due to standing waves within material. (will also bounce around inside material. In ways that are dependent on thickness/roughness of surface etc) Might be tiny reductions per cycle but it won't take long before material has experied huge number of cycles.
Well Bendall may well be a crank, but here is the interesting thing. He has managed to convince a small substation in London to trial this device on a 300 kW Perkins Generator, as we speak..The claim of substantially reduced carbon emissions must be sufficiently evident to be let loose on such an expensive piece equipment, right?
@@pauloneill9880 Hopefully, but my gut instinct is it will be brushed under the carpet somehow. There are two possibilities as to why we wont see it go mainstream anytime soon, 1)it is and existential threat to centralised energy production or 2) it doesn't work..The only way to out such technology, should it exist, is to share and replicate with an easy to follow construction method, including precise dimensions and parts list on a channel such as this..
One Can point to similarities between the two technologies, however, I’m wondering if you have actually reviewed the presentation points on the current offering. It’s not the bubbler or the tubes that are the key here. It is the sacred geometry, the highly sophisticated, geometry, and its application, through deep understanding of historical principles, scientific principles, and spiritual principles. This one works. Malcolm did his homework!
The Pratt and Witney R2800 engine I used to fly had water injection, for just this purpose. It cooled the exhaust temperature, and gave greater volumetric expansion of gasses in the cylinder. It was only used for take-off. The Rolls Royce Spey jet engine also had water injection, for the same purpose. But it was not cleap, as the de-min water they used was reasonably expensive, and the aircraft had to carry sufficient water down to remote outstations, so they could use it on the return take-off. R
I do admire your view as a sceptic, the analytical path must be taken. I’m sure you are aware of Victor Schaubergers work on vortex pathways through fluid mediums. I personally believe that his work has validity…. But to each his own. Cheers!
That makes no sense. This is what it looks like you're saying I like it i dont understand it its to hard to investigate so im going to say somethings close to it and drop names and call it a day. Good luck don't exist
Much respect Neil. Do what is best for you and your family. Many admire your work and the value and advice you bring to this and other channels. There are other communication channels out there and when you have value - people will find your message! Especially loved your in depth details on the Great Depression Era segments (well worth an award and a valuable legacy to younger kids in the historical content and accuracy). Save the good stuff and your hard work for a medium which treats you right. Thanks for the insight you provided today and hopefully other content providers appreciate it. Cheers sir. You do great work and it is genuine!
Water injection was used under emergency power conditions in P-47 Thunderbolt fighter aircraft in WWII (and others no doubt) but this merely cooled the cylinders when at extra high power I suspect.
Samples from the big thunderstorm generator are being now looked at under an scm, structures they're finding do look odd, Sulfur crystals originating from a one point with a perfectly spherical hollow balls of iron at their termination point, they really might be onto something. I really recommend watching some scm sessions done on these samples by Bob Greener. Structures they're finding definitely don't seem like they're just a result of contaminated fuel
Look up Bob Greenyer at the Martin Fleischman Memorial Project from a few days ago. He has proved Malcolm's thunder storm generator works. This is the dawn of a new era of knowledge for humanity
You started off by giving a very kind summary of how the device is supposed to work and then continued by kindly explaining why it's simply impossible for the device to do what it says on the tin. I really appreciate the way you make science accessible. Thank you.
I would like to know that just because you can explain why it won't work in your imagination. You can use very basic measurement tools to see if it does work and proof in the pudding not in skepticism or optimism.
Hi rob I did build the geet generator a few years ago and it worked very well and yes there seemed fo be a huge reduction in toxic fumes.The thunderstorm generator principal is very similar and the geet is not the same as water injection .Why not build one on your show .See what happens when you add browns gas and organic hydrocarbon gas with a pinch of ultrasonic water vapor.
I have an idea how browns gas could maybe improve performance... In a real petrol engine that's working OK, combustion is a deflagration. That the flame spreads out from spark plug at subsonic speeds. Because such combustion isn't instant, it's less thermodynamically ideal than the *theoretical* otto cycle. Anything that moves combustion towards instant improves the engine's power Plural spark plugs are one way that has been used by couple of car manufacturers.. If flames have half the distance to burn, combustion takes half the time etc. Adding gases that burn with a very quick inital flash, that then ignites main fuel of much higher energy might be annother approach. There is a potential problem with speeding up combustion in an engine. If the combustion goes supersonic. Engine is said to be experiencing detonation. And such tends to destroy engines within a very short time.
they've put emissions measuring device on a industrial generator with this device lately and they're getting results that are unexplainable and i think the plasma explanation is more of a best guess of what's happening .once hot the exhaust emissions measurements shows oxygen goes up to 15-20% and co2 goes down to around 4 % or lower and others that i can't remember . importantly these experiments are repeatable and the numbers don't lie. i don't blame you if you're skeptical i was too .
Having personally run water injection on my own engine i can say it definitely helps with detonation at higher compression ratios. There was a small percentage more mileage but nor significant. I kind of figured when i saw this tech that turningwater to steam before it enters the engine would be beneficial as in more efficient. Like all other things I will have to build this contraption to see how it works. Great video thank you for your input.
Absolutely facinateing ....... !!!!!! I remember in the early to mid 80s a couple of Buddy's fitted a mk3 zephyr motor in to a Thames trader van and were experimenting with a crude water injection system , that is a smaller percentage with petrol ....... I can't remember details other than they did increase mpg ......o I miss the 80s ..... Thankyou for this facinateing journey !!!! 😉😎
Given the number of technical and scientific people who have watched the thunderstorm generator perform, and have monitored the process and it's emissions closely, I don't see how it could have been faked. It's been replicated many times over. Something is there that warrants further investigation.
Engine exhaust might be around 240C, but the hottest part of the swirl guide is said to be like 767C. This is not a Ranque-Hilsch vortex tube, because there is a barrier between intake and exhaust flows, but it does scavenge entropy. How can this anomalously high temperature be explained?
Hi Rob I think you are a fascinating presenter. Since your review of the thunderstorm generator was aired I respectfully request that you review the latest information on this on various websites as I understand your review and I would have totally agreed with this a few months ago. But I had come across other information about this and it appears to have been previously covered up in the past. No surprise there. Please look into recent conventions on alternative sources,. It will enable you to contact a uk based company working on this in conjunction with oversees. I will await your comment once you have investigated. Many Thanks. P.J
Rob is a good guy and love his videos. But he is operating from inside the fish tank of the matrix. The only way to get out of the fish tank is to build a esoteric device and see the results for yourself
Ahh the Geet device! It was presumptioin that the rod being used in the center rod was using the earths magnetic field and vaccuum to create the ionic charges needed for the device to operate properly... I have looked into this in past but never experimented yet. Funny how inventors are bankrupted, ruined and then called crazy then later their inventions show up in Corporate designs... Keep up great work, be in peace God speed,.
I have built a geet this summer and it indeeed is something worth experimenting with i had it running on mostly water or motor oil or a few other things aswell needs some tuning with valves and rod sizes and such to run different fuels . Why not give it a go it is simple enough to put together and you seem plenty capable im not sure about malcoms edition but there seems to be similarities it’s possible he improved pauls device which seems to have quite a bit of people who have had sucsess aswell😊
@@Xolisaz83 yes see there is something to it not just people making up things Robert should give it a go with the proper tools you could make it bettet than me but i saw effects with hardware store parts
A U.S. utility patent, is generally granted for 20 years from the date the patent application is filed; however, periodic fees are required to maintain the enforceability of the patent. Patents can't be renewed once they've lived out their 20 years. A patent becomes public domain (free for use by the public) upon its expiration, which is defined as 20 years from the patent's earliest non-provisional filing date. MPEP §201.04. The 20-year patent term applies to utility and plant patents.
I would totally agree with you but they're running it off the exhaust side which would produce more than 110 PSI and it's putting out at least 1000 degrees
They just tested a working prototype with measuring equipment, provided by Both Malcolm & the scientists at the convention. Even though the device wasn’t working optimally, it did have higher levels of oxygen emissions and little to no carbon emissions. You should observe that video to see if everything is legit.
Thanks for this and the background. I was caught by the bendal flap to see where its going. I did wonder what would happen when the engines are under load
You just forgot to explain the 21% oxygen coming out of the final exhaust on the latest thunderstorm generator. Oh and the pipes do get cold and hot, with as much as 400f temperature difference on both ends. Infact the internal stainless pipe gets so hot that it becomes ferromagnetic.
21% is surprisingly close to ambient air concentration.. don’t you think 😂? Almost as if.. he might be measuring… ambient air? Did you watch his recent road show videos where he failed… again.. to make it work in public? Such a bloody nuisance after all these years that his amazing inventions keep getting stuck by misfortune when they have the opportunity to be verified.
"internal stainless pipe" do you mean the "intake" pipe? That would make sense with this heater exchanger, as the exhaust gases from the engine are roughly 800F. I hope more visible testing is completed.
After many years of experimenting; i have concluded that the smaller the size of gasoline vapor (particle size) , the leaner the engine can run, until we achieve smaller and smaller vapor size , and gasoline is a dry gas... (max. leanness ). I noticed that my huge 360 c.i. V8 ran very well with real hot air / fuel mix and a small single bbl. carburetor (meant for a much smaller engine.) in this way i could turn off the idling screw all the way vaporize
As a mechanic of many many years, I can tell you that we used water injection clear back to my '69 Oldsmobile. We hooked it to an off idle vacuum port on the carburetor and it helped. A major problem was carburetor icing and, of course, winter. We are talking about a 455 cubic inch (7.5l) engine which was extremely inefficient.
Brother Robby! I salute you for your service to the truth. Sir. I knew Paul Pantone before he passed away. I put a geet reactor on a moped I built... it ran on vegetable oil vapors... supposedly the reaction can be tuned to make water into hydrogen with correct reaction rod length and proper surface area of reaction rods to engine displacement volume...
A video I was excited to see you had posted! If anyone is interested in learning a lot more about this Alchemical Science and The Martin Fleischman Memorial Project explain it really well.
On a different subject i was thinking about a boat propeller called an axiom. It seems counter intuitive how this works but i have sussed it and it illuminates a lot of other stuff. Anyway i think you should have a go at using the basic idea for a wind turbine.
Hahaha I am just learning about this from the Shawn Ryan Show and this is a great counter argument/good points laid out in a fantastically hilarious way. Haha Thank you for the video
In some ways I feel sorry for Randall, but on the other hand, I guess it might be a huge wake up call. Gonna be some really interesting podcasts coming out in 2024 once Bendall and his team do a runner.
He made all the info public domain and free to use and it has been proven to work, several people have already made their own and attached to cars and they work, the indian navy is starting to test them, i think you are in for a wakeup call.
@@denisemcrae3044I'm ready to eat mine what about you? Next time you work on a car take a peek at the exhaust manifold (the pipes coming off the back of the engine leading to the muffler) than look at the muffler it's self. You'll see the little circles they claim are caused by plasmoids (😂😂😂😂😂) as well as the "crystals" in the form of soot!
From what i seen lastnight its about the direct angle of 51.84 degrees same as khufus pyramid and it makes pure oxygen well at 20% but other gases vanish or turb into it
I wonder if you replaced the lightbulb with a magnetron and induced ultrasonic cavitation to relieve the vacuum energy being spent, if this could be made to work. It seemed like a story of almosts.
This subject has been spreaded on different channels and make my day happy😀. I am surprised by how many people have missed their elementary physics classes and are still believe in miracles... "vortex", "plasma", "plasmoid"😇, "atomic transmutation"😇, "cold fusion"😇, "thunderstorm generator"... a mixt of physical terms used to create the sensation of high science and to describe the functionality of this retrofitted gasoline engine E-generator - most probably the manufacturer of this generator is very happy with the sales. The main core "thunderstorm generator" is a simple heat exchanger to pre-heat the inlet air using the exhaust gases - charges and polarization on this structure in this configuration, this is a nonsense. Some ions are generated on the input by UV but, they will be neutralized and lost in the first stage. This bubble generator is a simple air filter. Most probably the pre-heating of inlet air will improve the motor performance but IT WILL NOT CREATE CLEAN AIR. To do that, some people are using water electrolysis on their setup to create hydrogen which will be injected progressively in the engine and to replace the fossil fuel and to "demonstrate" the "carbon transmutation"😇😁 - in this case the engine has become only hydrogen fuelled. I will stop here my short analysis and my advice is to read once and think twice before to believe such of things.
I'm retarded so I can't prove or disprove it, only thing I will say is thatt there isn't a manufacturer, it's all open source. I do see random people occasionally building them on youtube. The people pushing it would maybe be making some money, but not much.
Hi Robert! Could you please do a video on hydrogen production by using a regular microwave, crucible filled with flux and plastic pellets (mostly HDPE). Apparently a gram of HDPE yields near 1L of nearly pure hydrogen and remnant hydrocarbons. The solid residue is multi-walled carbon nanotube powder! I have an original link to an article and research somewhere... if you're interested!
This might actually work. Ethylene is hydrogen attached to carbon, and if, as you say, you could separate the carbon and hydrogen you might have the basis for a fuel. In one Mr Robert's videos he talks about grabbing CO2 and turning it into ethylene as a fuel, so there you go, full circle.
@@quartamile look up Bob greenyer and the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project to show you how to do it. And other methods of making Exotic Vacuum Objects
@@quartamile if you stop following scammers like this guy you too, like me, can transmute CO2 and CO into O2 as well then show your friends etc and change the entire world for the better.!
Reminds me of the energized fog particles written in Moray Kings book on water fuel. The missing link for generation is the parametric energy synthesis, i.e. collecting light, thermal, and pressure magnitudes simultaneously from said impulse.
Now, wait... I haven't finished the video. What this puts me in mind of is Woodgas, and recycling your exhaust to get a more complete burn of that which will burn... is there a way to do that? is that what they're Doing?
I love the scientific analysis of the foundations of the device to determine if and why it would or would not work and why it’s unique or not. Take a Pat on the back for the knife twisting in the final few moments of the video. I won’t bother googling his background. I think I can guess.
The weirder part of this for me is this guy who is promoting the whole thing: Gary Ling from "Ballsy Thinking". He has the nickname "fixer" on his name badge in one of the videos, which I interpreted in a couple of ways...guy has an interesting resume.
@ThinkingandTinkering , you mentioned the bubbles generated at the boundary between a boat prop and water. Cavitation is what it's called. The collapse of each little cavitation bubble can take surface material off the prop, leaving it pitted. But, I'm preaching to the choir on that one. The relevant issue is that each collapse also has the potential of temporarily ionizing a small portion of the water, producing a bright flash for an instant.
There's also the point that after this first device was developed ic engines were redesigned to run a lot leaner, which basically has the same effect as the complicated device.
@@geomatrix9992 'a lot leaner' =/= 'lean burn'. Modern engines use a lot less petrol than 1970s ones, with lower emissions including lower NOx. Because better design.
Наука
![Veeze - F.A.F (ft. Rylo Rodriguez) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/7hlz2S2GmIY/mqdefault.jpg)
Hey Rob! I'm a long time member and subscriber with my personal account. First of all, I have huge respect for you as a scientist and inventor. You inspired me to take a course in standard electrical engineering and in part to start my RUclips channel.
I also have relied on your skeptical open mind as a gate keeper for ideas in this field many times.
But you've got a number of things either incorrect or just out of context in the video. I'm going to try and do a respectful response video in a few weeks based on the historical evidence in plasma physics for what is going on and the current trials from independents. I'll also explain my understanding of the differences with the GEET. There are similarities but they are showing different results and have some key differences. If I can swing it, I'll encourage Malcolm to send you a prototype to review yourself in the near future. The first 25 preproduction experimental units are going out to research teams ATM but I expect there will be more soon. Cheers!
Thank you
Now this would be interesting to get the machine in front of Robert! Nice way to collaborate!
You've shown your hand as not independent by saying "If I can swing it, I'll encourage Malcolm to send you a prototype to review yourself in the near future".
IT WORKS!
Plasmoid unification Theory connected with sacred numbers that are everywhere in our religions & the pyramid microwave device! ALL right before our EYES DELIBERATELY HIDDEN! we CAN'T
CONTINUE! IM UNSUBSCRIBING FROM UR PROPAGANDA channel
@@ESS284what? Shown your hand? It's an open to all collaborative to develop the technology for all to benefit. They talk together and so he could ask malcom.
I made a geek generator for my B&S 3.5hp motor.... it ran on 50/50 water and gasoline after being started on 100% gasoline and warmed up..... the geek generator works, I ran it on water and oil with gasoline mixed in for good measure ( the gas makes it easier to start)
I am not really sure that the device splits the water molecules or not or just uses the water as steam in the cylinder.... i suspect the latter.... but it did run on a 50/50 mixture of gas and water.... where it normally would not it took the exhaust heated cylinder to work...
it was a extremely interesting experiment but I never did anything with the set up as it took alot of fiddling to get it to run initially.
I also tried a water injection system in my Ford Pinto.... it went through about 1 gallon of water per tank full of gas..... it made the engine run better and the car felt more responsive. I ran it for about 6~8 months till the big mason jar froze and broke the jar.... then I took it off.
i did not notice any gas milage improvement at all, in fact I think it went down a small amount
but when I took the head off everything inside looked like it had been sandblasted clean no carbon anywhere even the pistons were shiny ! ..... so it is a great thing to do before a overhaul !
My uncle made one in school during the early 80's, it was so efficient the motor would freeze up and stop working. He says random people will still ask him about it 40 years later, it's still laying around his shop to this day.
You should have used a metal gallon can instead of a glass jar. AND added anti freeze in the winter. That will burn like any other liquid according to Pantone.
Anyone else become aware of this device from the Danny Jones Podcast with Randal Carlson?
in my research on this the message I got was Carlson should run away from this as he is damaging his rep - but I am quoting blogs I read
@ThinkingandTinkering You're not wrong there. He said himself he doesn't know much about it and needs a few months for research.
I know magnitudes less than anyone about the subject, but I like to think I would research beforehand 🤔
Let's hope he focuses on his sacred geometry, through which he inspired many.
Much like, unbeknownst to you, you have sparked a strong flame within me to pick up electronics again. Stayed up all night 2 weeks ago binge watching all your videos I deemed most relevant to me at this time haha. (I even joined brilliant to learn)
Cheers Rob 🍻
@@ThinkingandTinkeringthe whole thing stinks. I love a conspiracy or I wouldn't be sniffing around this ARC rubbish, but me has a feeling Bendall and some of his associates might be "intentionally" leading people astray, as a career, as it were.
I did.
I am reminded of cold fusion. Need I say more?
My god! This has taken me back 35 years. I remember trying out water injection on my Kawasaki Z650. Using hypodermic needles inserted into each inlet collar. The thing sucked in nearly a pint of water in about 30 seconds. I was lucky I didn't hydro-lock a cylinder or two. Left the idea for another day and never bothered going back to it.
that's a lot of water!
Flow rate is too high. Try a butterfly needle then work your way up.
The water never enters the engine with this device, there are no moving parts, it simply uses cold air entering one end and warm air entering the other to generate plasmoids in the water as the exhaust goes through it and the plasmoids convert the gases into oxygen
I think there are a lot of people who had an idea or a feeling there was something there, and even in fruition, it is a simple form that is counterintuitive to our current models. Deprogramming is hard lol
"THATS GOING TO ITCH WHEN IT DRIES!"😕
Why don't you build one and test it? I would have thought that would be right up your alley. It's all open source apparently.
He doesn’t need to! Malcom Bendall already did it and proved to the world it works…. 😂 right… ?
@@lmnow there have been countless prototypes built. The Independent science group MFMP has verified that it works as stated. Scoff at it at your own peril.
People need to stop thinking these content creators are any more than just content creators.
Because it'd be proven wrong you can't have him doing that now can you improving to the world that we've been denied free energy for hundreds of years so the elites can use this for themselves and our peril this is a classic example of gatekeeping 0:01
@@EGO_OUTAtadistance70over unity unless it's fusion, is a no go
@cjdelphi YES! THATS EXACTLY WHAT'S HAPPENING
For what it's worth. I recall that the Geet engine had the exhaust tube magnetized in one direction then the intake tube inside it is magnetized the other direction and finally the rod inside it is opposing the intake magnetically. He had different rods that would work better for different fuels. Like I said, for what it's worth. Great job again, Rob. Thanks for breaking it down. Cheers mate!
Ohhhh i get it. Guy builds/does something that could positively change our lives,n he ends up prosecuted & branded crazy 🤯
Reminds you of anything or snuone today 🤔
Take a thermodynamics class. It will teach you to spot many frauds such as this device.
@@akulkis I'm not really sure the Laws of Thermodynamics debunk this...
Year 1900, people use their brains when science-ing. Today, my never worked in their life professor gave me a book with all the answers.
@@akulkis Laws are Laws until they are not. Not the first time. And won't be the last.
no one is saying that the technology is fake. but is it 1. reliable 2. efficient 3. safe 4. scalable? a good idea is a good idea. oil companies don't give a damn about this, every single thing in our lives is dependent on oil. if it works then it will become a thing. since it hasn't maybe it needs more work. there are hundreds of countries that would use the tech if it worked, but obviously it doesn't at scale. yet!
In 2015 I built the Geet device. Works great as long as the load is about 70% or more. A loaded generator @ 80% power constantly is a fantastic candidate for the application. It will burn almost anything as long as the reactor rod is tuned to the fuel. Oil needs a longer reactor rod while hydrogen needs a much shorter one. The reactor rod must be trained... When I was racing, we employed a process to hydrogenate the engine blocks. It took about a month to hydrogenate an aluminum block and about 4 months to hydrogenate an Iron block. Bottom line... ionic treatment with racing has been around for centuries. Most haven't a clue as to how or why. The bottom, bottom line is creating a battery in plain sight to prime nitrogen to release its force. Been there done that got that T shirt. That and a dollar will buy a cup of coffee. There is no free energy! It takes time and preparation for comparison to produce a very short show! Not meant for the long haul. Long haul in my book is 1,000,000 miles/1,609,344 Km while the impressive short haul is 500 miles. A demonstration of 5,000 miles is a drop in the bucket however will miss the mark of the long haul. Currently I'm focused on graphene & selenium/sulfur bipolar batteries. We are on the leading edge of EV batteries that charge very quickly however the cycle times keeps diminishing. It's hard work to keep a golf cart running for years compared to keeping a diesel, petrol, propane or natural gas-powered vehicles running. I talked to my Amazon driver today who is averaging 160 stops a day. He loves his new EV delivery truck and reports that he is able to make a 12-hour run. I'll keep you posted on what he says next year.
as i said water injection into ICE works just fine - it doesn't need anything else
Have you tried a JoeCell yet, asking for a friend
The whole apparent transmuting elements thing was actually a huge eyebrow raiser for myself.
I had several livestreams from several semi related people pop up in my feed, as well as people directly involved.
Made mention that it looked like a fancy heat exchanger, and actually raised the whole transmuting stuff as a concern which funny enough was never addressed.
"So uh, where is the carbon going buddies?"
Lol,the carbon ass you ask the buddies ,is being systematicly seperated and auctioned of into new atomic elements to the highest bidder buddy!, and the quarks mewons and newons from sed processes are instigating furthete frequency atomic de and reconstruction of thete own knumbnutsss!! Sorry not sorry!
And sulphur and other things. Crude oil has a lot of stuff in it that doesn't burn. And the advertisement assumes co2 isn't a pollutant....
well if you believe it mate - you believe it - not an issue for me
dont really believe it (probably should have said cocked a brow), I'm really skeptical of a lot of their claims @@ThinkingandTinkering
Particularly their claim about magically making half the stuff going into the engine disappear into thin air.
yeah you should lol - i joke mate - i am with you it's the magical thinking of transmutation and alchemical maths that leaves me cold
This is open source. Don’t go talking about money, motivating Malcolm. He made it open source. You are pissing me off. Are you really so quick to bash on this technology given the possibilities if it actually works. Think about it. If it actually works, we will be living in a new world. Do you really wanna act like a fact checker and squelch this before it gets a chance to anchor. Do you really want to cast aspersions about financial aspirations of the creator when he’s made it open source. Your skepticism feels like it’s born of intellectual rigidity and general ignorance.
@bruceames9224 Don't worry about saving the world with this contraption. Radioactivity from the huge releases from Fukushima and a lesser extent chernobyl, and the million tons dumped into the oceans during bomb development, cannot be denied. Humanity has cut its own throat, and the millions of species trapped here in our thin biosphere are dying rapidly from our insane playing with technologies that we cannot control, let alone understand. Radioactive substances cannot be made stable, and the laws of physics cannot be denied. It looks like electricity supplied to the water is causing the hydrolysis and the hydrogen is being recombined with oxygen somehow torn away from the carbon dioxide. Given that we cannot pick up atoms of plutonium that were blasted out of the Fukushima reactors and scattered world wide, we will never be able to stop the slow destruction of our circle of life. The plankton are gone missing from the pacific, killed by the fallout! This is why CO2 levels are rising, there is no mechanism for the co2 to be broken down! And the radioactive materials are still splitting atoms, releasing huge energies as waste heat, for the next million years or more! So thinking that this silly gismo can save us is beyond sane. The amount of radioactive decay heat is enough just in the fuel pools alone to cook the planet, and the radioactivity only increases and spreads, causing normal matter to decay and become radioactive, the reason they spoke of it as the ATOMIC PLAGUE in the 1950's, when it was discovered! So we have cooked our own goose, and the artificial intelligence can see no farther than we can! And certainly if we can't explain it, than it does not exist.
If it's open source and works then why haven't every car company picked up the so called technology
@@fatTony666 Thats a question for the oil companies there antoneknee !!!
@@fatTony666 Because the largest Oil Company controls the majority of the stock holdings as well as appoints only their own people to be in charge of those auto companies so as to maintain the status quo of all locomotion will be fueled by the OIL INDUSTRY and NO outside sources will be allowed to interfere with that MONOPOLY ! That is how John D. Rockefeller became the KING of OIL and it's been that way ever since!
@@fatTony666 thats so naive my friend. Why are there wars? why did wall st get a bail out? do you think we live on planet sunshine and roses? be for real.
My understanding is that Malcom was smeared by Shell oil over a prospecting dispute.
Also, the darn thing is transmuting elements, and that has been tested and proven.
It baffles me how this channel has went out of its way to make so many interesting little things that in some cases have potential and in others not so much. Yet when it comes to a device that seems to have heavy backing and has been tested and proven to work by actual scientists and engineers that this man discredits it outright without attempting it himself. I find it a bit unusual and out of character for someone who appears to care. Anyway its a much better practice (not to mention more HONEST) to first attempt something before disproving it, otherwise its just more empty words and disinformation.
@@OulChap I don't blame him for not believing it. Nobody believes me either.
the channel did none of those things he spoke with respect and gave us layman a thing to ponder, unlike you we have common sense. always question never settle@@OulChap
@@Toxic-nx6im this video was obviously created without the intent to back up what was said (empty words and disinformation). Saying he spoke with respect doesn't change the fact that the video exists, which in itself is fairly disrespectful. If this video had shown at a minimum an attempt to at least try the same or even a half assed attempt to debunk said system then the layman would be left with a thing or two to ponder. Then, and only then would it have been worth while watching. As per your previous response, I think your group needs to re-visit your definition of common sense as you are not getting that one right either. The only good point you raised in your highlighted reply was to "always question never settle", I have to admit it gave me a bit of a laugh as that's exactly what I've done regarding this video, yet you failed to even realise the same waffle you are dishing out. I suspect your comment was written as a blind reaction to my previous one without actually giving it any thought, either way my point still stands. I've been as fair with my comments as I possibly can be so you can either accept it for what it is or don't, either way I'll not lose any sleep over it.
Where has this even been proved as functional from any independent and correctly done study? It had been cool if it had worked, but still there are no objective proof whatsoever i could find.
Did this guy completely spin the whole planet or just the part he is standing on in the first :30?
Geet's device and the Thunderstorm generator are not the same thing.
Hit Piece much?
There should be a prize for being the humanity changer hitman video winner.
How is thunderstorm not a geet system? You have eyes and do not see.
Thanks for the video, I always enjoy your stuff.
Malcom has said that he built base on the research of others.
And he said the dimension are critical and base on the the Golden ratio.
It very interesting.
Thanks
Has Malcolm ever lied, or said anything to mislead investors in the past? 😂
I was thinking it would be a video about Kelvin Thunderstorm (water dropper). Which is an extremely simple device with no moving parts that generates electricity. The models on the internet are huge and take up a lot of space, but in reality the Kelvin Thunderstorm can be miniaturized because it seems that the amount of energy generated is not linked to the size of the device but rather the amount of water that passes through it. Miniaturizing them and connecting them in series would be a fascinating video/experiment!
(note, if you are going to try this, do it with extreme caution, the amount of energy generated by this device can easily be lethal)
🤔
Very interesting.
me too!
Why does everyone try and promote their friends idea. Ohh I thought that this was my friends invention that kinda works exactly like that.
No... No it doesn't work like this.
This is plasmoid technology
The main difference between the GEET is that the GEET processes the fuel and takes in the exhaust gases. The Thunderstorm generator does nothing to the fuel, only processes the air, no exhaust gasses are mixed in. Whether either produces plasmoids at such low pressure and under the stated conditions is really the question. Interestingly, if ultrasonic frequencies are present, then you can create plasmoids (put Al foil in an ultrasonic bath, run it for 60 seconds, and look at the foil under a microscope, and you will see effects on the foil, that quite frankly, are very odd. The foil is subjected to extreme cavitation and, some experimenters are looking at the foil under SEM only to find elements that were not present in the foil nor the water.
All that needs to happen for dismissal is for the skeptics to prove it is producing co2 and not nitrogen and oxygen like they claim. Seems like an easy test
Al foil degrades in water due to it reacting to it, producing Co2. The ultrasonic frequency is probably just speeding up that process like a catalyst through very rapid agitation.
@@maximosh Yes, it will react will dissolved O2, but observation of the reactant products should be purely Al2O3, not Carbon, Calcium, Silicon, Zn, Fe, Mg, Cl from DI water. The controls of both the water w/no Al sheet in one bath run, and the Al sheet from same run (w/o no ultrasound) doesn't indicate the contaminants in the metal itself. Vortical patterns abound and these elements only appear at the vortex points (one up and one down - always in pairs), nowhere else. High magnification indicates structures form inside the vortices seem to create lots of carbon (on outies - counter clockwise) and calcium (on innies - clockwise). Using other metal foils do similar things but the ratios are different. Perhaps the carbon is potentially from dissolved CO2, but only shows up in structures ("ejecta" from the foil itself) on the SEM - nowhere else (you should see it all over the place). The underlying patterns don't appear to line up with what you would expect an ultrasonic bath standing waves, either. I believe it's more than simple dissociation and O2+Al reaction. It's really interesting! I need to reproduce it myself and get my hands on an ICP and confirm the SEM data.
cheers mate
@@maximosh unlike say steel, alu has no fatigue limit... Meaning everytime it is exposed to a stress cycle it gets a tiny bit weaker. ultrasonic waves flex parts. Often with effects due to standing waves within material. (will also bounce around inside material. In ways that are dependent on thickness/roughness of surface etc)
Might be tiny reductions per cycle but it won't take long before material has experied huge number of cycles.
Once again I am blown away by your brilliance, well done
wow - thank you mate
There's no brilliance just spin & ignorant
Well Bendall may well be a crank, but here is the interesting thing. He has managed to convince a small substation in London to trial this device on a 300 kW Perkins Generator, as we speak..The claim of substantially reduced carbon emissions must be sufficiently evident to be let loose on such an expensive piece equipment, right?
I'm glad somebody is pointing this out. If this is the Geet it's likely the largest application of it.
yep
True and the TSG has been making the exhaust completely harmless. Magic is real.
@@pauloneill9880 Hopefully, but my gut instinct is it will be brushed under the carpet somehow. There are two possibilities as to why we wont see it go mainstream anytime soon, 1)it is and existential threat to centralised energy production or 2) it doesn't work..The only way to out such technology, should it exist, is to share and replicate with an easy to follow construction method, including precise dimensions and parts list on a channel such as this..
The Indian navy is also now testing it.
Thank you Robert! I'm so glad you've given Paul Pantone some recognition for the plasma carburetor.
cheers
I appreciate you breaking this down. It crossed my feed this morning and my head cold was leaving me blank.
One Can point to similarities between the two technologies, however, I’m wondering if you have actually reviewed the presentation points on the current offering. It’s not the bubbler or the tubes that are the key here. It is the sacred geometry, the highly sophisticated, geometry, and its application, through deep understanding of historical principles, scientific principles, and spiritual principles. This one works. Malcolm did his homework!
So glad I wasn't the only one to write and you made this video, many thanks.
never mind explaining why it wont work it does work it does work !!!!
The Pratt and Witney R2800 engine I used to fly had water injection, for just this purpose. It cooled the exhaust temperature, and gave greater volumetric expansion of gasses in the cylinder. It was only used for take-off.
The Rolls Royce Spey jet engine also had water injection, for the same purpose. But it was not cleap, as the de-min water they used was reasonably expensive, and the aircraft had to carry sufficient water down to remote outstations, so they could use it on the return take-off.
R
I appreciate your ability to rekindle my desire to learn things.
that is awesome to hear mate - cheers
Thank you, thank you, thank you so much for looking into this and presenting this video I am extremely excited about this Technology.
Glad it was helpful!
I do admire your view as a sceptic, the analytical path must be taken. I’m sure you are aware of Victor Schaubergers work on vortex pathways through fluid mediums. I personally believe that his work has validity…. But to each his own.
Cheers!
I do know Victor and his work mate and it fascinates me too
That makes no sense.
This is what it looks like you're saying
I like it i dont understand it its to hard to investigate so im going to say somethings close to it and drop names and call it a day. Good luck don't exist
I love your videos . Thank you for educating.
wow - thank you
Much respect Neil. Do what is best for you and your family. Many admire your work and the value and advice you bring to this and other channels. There are other communication channels out there and when you have value - people will find your message! Especially loved your in depth details on the Great Depression Era segments (well worth an award and a valuable legacy to younger kids in the historical content and accuracy). Save the good stuff and your hard work for a medium which treats you right. Thanks for the insight you provided today and hopefully other content providers appreciate it. Cheers sir. You do great work and it is genuine!
Water injection was used under emergency power conditions in P-47 Thunderbolt fighter aircraft in WWII (and others no doubt) but this merely cooled the cylinders when at extra high power I suspect.
Samples from the big thunderstorm generator are being now looked at under an scm, structures they're finding do look odd, Sulfur crystals originating from a one point with a perfectly spherical hollow balls of iron at their termination point, they really might be onto something. I really recommend watching some scm sessions done on these samples by Bob Greener. Structures they're finding definitely don't seem like they're just a result of contaminated fuel
do you have al ink?
Martin flashman memorial project all the research their
That sphere ran on coal for 8 years there was no other fuel
Look up Bob Greenyer at the Martin Fleischman Memorial Project from a few days ago. He has proved Malcolm's thunder storm generator works. This is the dawn of a new era of knowledge for humanity
You are a very capable tinker so why not build one and test it?
They are. and you can...
I just watched a video on this yesterday and I was going to ask you about it! Haven’t watched your video yet but I’m looking forward to it!!
cheers mate
So did you build one yet to give it its rest or are you still talkin
HaaaaaaahAahaah
You started off by giving a very kind summary of how the device is supposed to work and then continued by kindly explaining why it's simply impossible for the device to do what it says on the tin. I really appreciate the way you make science accessible. Thank you.
cheers mate
Thing is, is does work. See strike foundation or @quantumheat Bob Greeneyer.
I would like to know that just because you can explain why it won't work in your imagination. You can use very basic measurement tools to see if it does work and proof in the pudding not in skepticism or optimism.
@@wills2864 Well theres no pudding is there...
@flyingsodwai1382 depends where you look!
Hi rob I did build the geet generator a few years ago and it worked very well and yes there seemed fo be a huge reduction in toxic fumes.The thunderstorm generator principal is very similar and the geet is not the same as water injection .Why not build one on your show .See what happens when you add browns gas and organic hydrocarbon gas with a pinch of ultrasonic water vapor.
still got it?
No I sold it,if you would like to see it i can build another one .@@ThinkingandTinkering
I have an idea how browns gas could maybe improve performance...
In a real petrol engine that's working OK, combustion is a deflagration. That the flame spreads out from spark plug at subsonic speeds. Because such combustion isn't instant, it's less thermodynamically ideal than the *theoretical* otto cycle. Anything that moves combustion towards instant improves the engine's power
Plural spark plugs are one way that has been used by couple of car manufacturers.. If flames have half the distance to burn, combustion takes half the time etc.
Adding gases that burn with a very quick inital flash, that then ignites main fuel of much higher energy might be annother approach.
There is a potential problem with speeding up combustion in an engine. If the combustion goes supersonic. Engine is said to be experiencing detonation. And such tends to destroy engines within a very short time.
they've put emissions measuring device on a industrial generator with this device lately and they're getting results that are unexplainable and i think the plasma explanation is more of a best guess of what's happening .once hot the exhaust emissions measurements shows oxygen goes up to 15-20% and co2 goes down to around 4 % or lower and others that i can't remember .
importantly these experiments are repeatable and the numbers don't lie. i don't blame you if you're skeptical i was too .
Having personally run water injection on my own engine i can say it definitely helps with detonation at higher compression ratios. There was a small percentage more mileage but nor significant. I kind of figured when i saw this tech that turningwater to steam before it enters the engine would be beneficial as in more efficient. Like all other things I will have to build this contraption to see how it works. Great video thank you for your input.
Have you looked into the temperature and magnetic anomalies? There is a large setup operating on a natural gas powerplant in GB.
Absolutely facinateing ....... !!!!!! I remember in the early to mid 80s a couple of Buddy's fitted a mk3 zephyr motor in to a Thames trader van and were experimenting with a crude water injection system , that is a smaller percentage with petrol ....... I can't remember details other than they did increase mpg ......o I miss the 80s ..... Thankyou for this facinateing journey !!!! 😉😎
lol - glad you enjoyed it mate
Hi Rob! And here I was thinking of a generator getting power from thunderstorms .Keep up the good work .
It works like a thunderstorm, it generates mini thunderstorms thats where the name comes from.
Perhaps when the test data is viewed, with independent confirmation, you might reconsider your stance.
Results speak for themselves i find.
Given the number of technical and scientific people who have watched the thunderstorm generator perform, and have monitored the process and it's emissions closely, I don't see how it could have been faked. It's been replicated many times over. Something is there that warrants further investigation.
Engine exhaust might be around 240C, but the hottest part of the swirl guide is said to be like 767C. This is not a Ranque-Hilsch vortex tube, because there is a barrier between intake and exhaust flows, but it does scavenge entropy. How can this anomalously high temperature be explained?
Hi Rob I think you are a fascinating presenter. Since your review of the thunderstorm generator was aired I respectfully request that you review the latest information on this on various websites as I understand your review and I would have totally agreed with this a few months ago. But I had come across other information about this and it appears to have been previously covered up in the past. No surprise there. Please look into recent conventions on alternative sources,. It will enable you to contact a uk based company working on this in conjunction with oversees.
I will await your comment once you have investigated.
Many Thanks. P.J
Rob is a good guy and love his videos. But he is operating from inside the fish tank of the matrix. The only way to get out of the fish tank is to build a esoteric device and see the results for yourself
… 😂 Malcolm is a career con artist ?
I have been awaiting a real explanation of this- thank you!
hope it helped mate
How would you like the explanation im fairly fluid in the information
Randall Carlson covers this in quite detail. These are being tested on industrial scale levels as I type this….
Thank you !
cheers mate
Ahh the Geet device! It was presumptioin that the rod being used in the center rod was using the earths magnetic field and vaccuum to create the ionic charges needed for the device to operate properly... I have looked into this in past but never experimented yet. Funny how inventors are bankrupted, ruined and then called crazy then later their inventions show up in Corporate designs... Keep up great work, be in peace God speed,.
cheers mate
The claim has been made of transmutation.
He doesnt seem to understand that massive shearing forces are not required to make tiny little BUBBLES which then cavitate later
Build one
and meanwhile he keeps testing it and making huge progress. It's proven reliable at this point, now they even have a compact one.
I have built a geet this summer and it indeeed is something worth experimenting with i had it running on mostly water or motor oil or a few other things aswell needs some tuning with valves and rod sizes and such to run different fuels . Why not give it a go it is simple enough to put together and you seem plenty capable im not sure about malcoms edition but there seems to be similarities it’s possible he improved pauls device which seems to have quite a bit of people who have had sucsess aswell😊
I also built a few geets and was pleasantly surprised!
@@Xolisaz83 yes see there is something to it not just people making up things Robert should give it a go with the proper tools you could make it bettet than me but i saw effects with hardware store parts
Looking forward to this guys video he makes to retract his statements after he views the data and microscopy…
A U.S. utility patent, is generally granted for 20 years from the date the patent application is filed; however, periodic fees are required to maintain the enforceability of the patent.
Patents can't be renewed once they've lived out their 20 years. A patent becomes public domain (free for use by the public) upon its expiration, which is defined as 20 years from the patent's earliest non-provisional filing date. MPEP §201.04. The 20-year patent term applies to utility and plant patents.
Pump cavitation does this as well. The problem with that is it produces a lot of heat and destroys pumps, through the heat and vibration.
I would totally agree with you but they're running it off the exhaust side which would produce more than 110 PSI and it's putting out at least 1000 degrees
They just tested a working prototype with measuring equipment, provided by Both Malcolm & the scientists at the convention. Even though the device wasn’t working optimally, it did have higher levels of oxygen emissions and little to no carbon emissions. You should observe that video to see if everything is legit.
Thanks for this and the background. I was caught by the bendal flap to see where its going. I did wonder what would happen when the engines are under load
cheers mate
I had port water injection on one of my old turbo cars. Removed latent heat and allowed me to run more timing/boost
*FINALLY* ! A 'peer review' explanation on the origins and function of Malcolm's TSG (presumably GEET ripoff).
BRAVO ZULU!
Informative as always Robert, dumping knowledge bombs like its going out of fashion. Good stuff.
cheers mate
Yeah, it is worth a smile!
I love this channel.
was wondering what Robert thought of recent research and studies have revealed in the last two weeks. interested hearing his take on it.
You just forgot to explain the 21% oxygen coming out of the final exhaust on the latest thunderstorm generator. Oh and the pipes do get cold and hot, with as much as 400f temperature difference on both ends. Infact the internal stainless pipe gets so hot that it becomes ferromagnetic.
21% is surprisingly close to ambient air concentration.. don’t you think 😂?
Almost as if.. he might be measuring… ambient air?
Did you watch his recent road show videos where he failed… again.. to make it work in public?
Such a bloody nuisance after all these years that his amazing inventions keep getting stuck by misfortune when they have the opportunity to be verified.
@@lmnow hundreds of people have publicly gotten it working? Explain that
"internal stainless pipe" do you mean the "intake" pipe?
That would make sense with this heater exchanger, as the exhaust gases from the engine are roughly 800F.
I hope more visible testing is completed.
After many years of experimenting; i have concluded that the smaller the size of gasoline vapor (particle size) , the leaner the engine can run, until we achieve smaller and smaller vapor size , and gasoline is a dry gas... (max. leanness ). I noticed that my huge 360 c.i. V8 ran very well with real hot air / fuel mix and a small single bbl. carburetor (meant for a much smaller engine.) in this way i could turn off the idling screw all the way vaporize
cheers mate
As a mechanic of many many years, I can tell you that we used water injection clear back to my '69 Oldsmobile. We hooked it to an off idle vacuum port on the carburetor and it helped. A major problem was carburetor icing and, of course, winter. We are talking about a 455 cubic inch (7.5l) engine which was extremely inefficient.
water injection works
This is plasmoid technology. Needs no moving parts
Brother Robby! I salute you for your service to the truth. Sir. I knew Paul Pantone before he passed away. I put a geet reactor on a moped I built... it ran on vegetable oil vapors... supposedly the reaction can be tuned to make water into hydrogen with correct reaction rod length and proper surface area of reaction rods to engine displacement volume...
A video I was excited to see you had posted!
If anyone is interested in learning a lot more about this Alchemical Science and The Martin Fleischman Memorial Project explain it really well.
cool
I tried, but I couldn't watch it all. Check it out. Interesting...@@ThinkingandTinkering
One French guy had Paul's system on his fishing trawler!
On a different subject i was thinking about a boat propeller called an axiom. It seems counter intuitive how this works but i have sussed it and it illuminates a lot of other stuff. Anyway i think you should have a go at using the basic idea for a wind turbine.
cheers mate
Oxygen levels are actually increased so its pulling oxygen from something in the exhaust.
But where did he place the Encabulator?
Hahaha I am just learning about this from the Shawn Ryan Show and this is a great counter argument/good points laid out in a fantastically hilarious way. Haha Thank you for the video
In some ways I feel sorry for Randall, but on the other hand, I guess it might be a huge wake up call. Gonna be some really interesting podcasts coming out in 2024 once Bendall and his team do a runner.
Explain how we observed matter going out of the sphere and then back in? Mufflers produce spark. It doesn't
Go thru metal. Dying for explanation.
It’s not Randall is due for the wake up call!
He made all the info public domain and free to use and it has been proven to work, several people have already made their own and attached to cars and they work, the indian navy is starting to test them, i think you are in for a wakeup call.
I think you may have to eat your words soon. Big things happening with this that cannot be discussed publicly just yet
@@denisemcrae3044I'm ready to eat mine what about you? Next time you work on a car take a peek at the exhaust manifold (the pipes coming off the back of the engine leading to the muffler) than look at the muffler it's self. You'll see the little circles they claim are caused by plasmoids (😂😂😂😂😂) as well as the "crystals" in the form of soot!
Geet. This was my first question too. Implosion and Cavitation and protons. Joe Cell did it first. Flux pinning 😮
From what i seen lastnight its about the direct angle of 51.84 degrees same as khufus pyramid and it makes pure oxygen well at 20% but other gases vanish or turb into it
I've seen one working it works why don't you try it instead of crying over the science.
Exactly 👍🏻
what would we do without you sir
I wonder if you replaced the lightbulb with a magnetron and induced ultrasonic cavitation to relieve the vacuum energy being spent, if this could be made to work. It seemed like a story of almosts.
This subject has been spreaded on different channels and make my day happy😀. I am surprised by how many people have missed their elementary physics classes and are still believe in miracles... "vortex", "plasma", "plasmoid"😇, "atomic transmutation"😇, "cold fusion"😇, "thunderstorm generator"... a mixt of physical terms used to create the sensation of high science and to describe the functionality of this retrofitted gasoline engine E-generator - most probably the manufacturer of this generator is very happy with the sales.
The main core "thunderstorm generator" is a simple heat exchanger to pre-heat the inlet air using the exhaust gases - charges and polarization on this structure in this configuration, this is a nonsense.
Some ions are generated on the input by UV but, they will be neutralized and lost in the first stage. This bubble generator is a simple air filter.
Most probably the pre-heating of inlet air will improve the motor performance but IT WILL NOT CREATE CLEAN AIR. To do that, some people are using water electrolysis on their setup to create hydrogen which will be injected progressively in the engine and to replace the fossil fuel and to "demonstrate" the "carbon transmutation"😇😁 - in this case the engine has become only hydrogen fuelled.
I will stop here my short analysis and my advice is to read once and think twice before to believe such of things.
100% agree, this is bs and they behave like in a cult - also they 0 knowledge about physics... it's alien math and numerology, ffs
why would hotter intake air improve engine performance. looks like neither "inventors" nor debunkers have any clue how anything works
I'm retarded so I can't prove or disprove it, only thing I will say is thatt there isn't a manufacturer, it's all open source. I do see random people occasionally building them on youtube. The people pushing it would maybe be making some money, but not much.
Hi Robert! Could you please do a video on hydrogen production by using a regular microwave, crucible filled with flux and plastic pellets (mostly HDPE). Apparently a gram of HDPE yields near 1L of nearly pure hydrogen and remnant hydrocarbons. The solid residue is multi-walled carbon nanotube powder!
I have an original link to an article and research somewhere... if you're interested!
Link the article. Cheers
Link?
This might actually work. Ethylene is hydrogen attached to carbon, and if, as you say, you could separate the carbon and hydrogen you might have the basis for a fuel. In one Mr Robert's videos he talks about grabbing CO2 and turning it into ethylene as a fuel, so there you go, full circle.
can you post the article title and DOI a link won't work
@@ThinkingandTinkering Absolutely! It would be my pleasure. Give me a moment, please.
With a petroleum fuel all that has been built is a carburettor comparable to one built 130 years ago.
yep - with a few twiddely bits that do nothing
Thanks for looking into this, I asked thunderf00t to look into this, but you got there first.
I built Paul's engine back in 2005 ish. I have a folder full of videos and pictures of my GEET builds, if you are interested?
This video didn’t age well
He's too smart to admit he doesn't know WTF is going on sometimes.
Why?
@@quartamile because even I have made the storm generator and yes it works exactly as it says in the box
@@quartamile look up Bob greenyer and the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project to show you how to do it. And other methods of making Exotic Vacuum Objects
@@quartamile if you stop following scammers like this guy you too, like me, can transmute CO2 and CO into O2 as well then show your friends etc and change the entire world for the better.!
Reminds me of the energized fog particles written in Moray Kings book on water fuel. The missing link for generation is the parametric energy synthesis, i.e. collecting light, thermal, and pressure magnitudes simultaneously from said impulse.
indeed
I wish we could take Stephen Meyers water spark plug apart and examine it!! Thank you good sir that was interesting!
Look's like R.M-S didn't like the Thunderstorm generator and will regret his wording. 😆
This cropped up in my YT feed, too. It's an artifact of the algorithm I think.
probably mate
Now, wait... I haven't finished the video. What this puts me in mind of is Woodgas, and recycling your exhaust to get a more complete burn of that which will burn... is there a way to do that? is that what they're Doing?
yeah that is part of what they are doing
Some modern gas furnaces 98 percent work kid of like it
I love the scientific analysis of the foundations of the device to determine if and why it would or would not work and why it’s unique or not.
Take a Pat on the back for the knife twisting in the final few moments of the video. I won’t bother googling his background. I think I can guess.
lol - cheers mate
The weirder part of this for me is this guy who is promoting the whole thing: Gary Ling from "Ballsy Thinking". He has the nickname "fixer" on his name badge in one of the videos, which I interpreted in a couple of ways...guy has an interesting resume.
Hi Rob, couldn't agree more but, regarding implosion, steam bubbles contacting a liquid does implode quite aggressively.
yes it does if it is created and then implodes
On the vacuum front, it depends on the butterfly location, rpm and throttle position. 3 to 4 psi is around part to wide open throttle
cheers mate
Cavitation
tat means nothing - sorry mate
@ThinkingandTinkering , you mentioned the bubbles generated at the boundary between a boat prop and water. Cavitation is what it's called. The collapse of each little cavitation bubble can take surface material off the prop, leaving it pitted. But, I'm preaching to the choir on that one.
The relevant issue is that each collapse also has the potential of temporarily ionizing a small portion of the water, producing a bright flash for an instant.
yes cavitation will do that mate - but i am not sure cavitation is happening here
@@ThinkingandTinkering, in that device, you're most certainly right. My post was just in reference to the prop.
got it mate - cheers
There's also the point that after this first device was developed ic engines were redesigned to run a lot leaner, which basically has the same effect as the complicated device.
good point cheers mate
Not actually as a lean burn causes a major increase in NOx and test actually show a decrease in NOx
Also how do you explain the major increase in O2
@@geomatrix9992 'a lot leaner' =/= 'lean burn'. Modern engines use a lot less petrol than 1970s ones, with lower emissions including lower NOx. Because better design.
@@geomatrix9992 how do /you/ explain it? And from what data?
Thanks