As far as I know , Germany is the part of the European synchronous grid , so they do in fact use Nuclear energy but just not the one within their boundaries
I want ajay shah sir to take more topics on microeconomics, schumpeters creative destruction of capital , Innovation cycle of products ,why and how to do startups, etc
I think freedom is more important than efficiency, and in fact probably leads to efficiency. I read an article (from a book about politics of water policies in india ) about how subsidies in solar panels for pumping water from ground for irrigation was a bad idea economically and environmentally. Government intervention in anything does not seem to work.
i guess we could feature something on- decreasing cost of logistics to 5% (japan,vietnam) / since we have infinite lane expressway ie bay of bengal & arabian sea // along with numerous river navigation ; and rail
The real problem with the nuclear industry is the cost and time problem. The cost has to be competitive with natural gas at least and it just isnt. You have to bring the cost down and after so many decades i dont think it is happening. I think we will move to solar wind storage plus natural gas and even some coal back up. Even with a renewables grid stabilised by fossil fuels you will get emissions down by quite a lot. And perhaps we will have breakthrough in storage in time.
If we standardise nuclear reactor designs and manufacture the majority of parts in factories then we could get costs lower than fossil fuels. But it's a big if.
sir I do disagree with your point of nuclear reactor not on anything like environment or environment preservation etc i disagree only under simple logic that it is not cost effective you told that A single 50 megawatt plan will cost 200 million Dollars minimum we can build approximately upward 100 megawatts in solar and wind in that same money nuclear is viable
As far as I know , Germany is the part of the European synchronous grid , so they do in fact use Nuclear energy but just not the one within their boundaries
Thanks for the rational, non-alarmist take on nuclear energy.
I want ajay shah sir to take more topics on microeconomics, schumpeters creative destruction of capital , Innovation cycle of products ,why and how to do startups, etc
Let’s imagine the change in the nuclear power policy creates a chain reaction in the Indian economy!
I think freedom is more important than efficiency, and in fact probably leads to efficiency. I read an article (from a book about politics of water policies in india ) about how subsidies in solar panels for pumping water from ground for irrigation was a bad idea economically and environmentally. Government intervention in anything does not seem to work.
i guess we could feature something on- decreasing cost of logistics to 5% (japan,vietnam) / since we have infinite lane expressway ie bay of bengal & arabian sea // along with numerous river navigation ; and rail
Small fusion reactors is the next big thing or already 😅❤🎉
The real problem with the nuclear industry is the cost and time problem. The cost has to be competitive with natural gas at least and it just isnt. You have to bring the cost down and after so many decades i dont think it is happening. I think we will move to solar wind storage plus natural gas and even some coal back up. Even with a renewables grid stabilised by fossil fuels you will get emissions down by quite a lot. And perhaps we will have breakthrough in storage in time.
Solar is cheaper as well
If we standardise nuclear reactor designs and manufacture the majority of parts in factories then we could get costs lower than fossil fuels. But it's a big if.
And for today, competitive capitalism has incentivised the building of nucleur reactors, so that big tech can run artificial intelligence
sir I do disagree with your point of nuclear reactor not on anything like environment or environment preservation etc i disagree only under simple logic that it is not cost effective you told that A single 50 megawatt plan will cost 200 million Dollars minimum we can build approximately upward 100 megawatts in solar and wind in that same money
nuclear is viable
Think of storage also.