Scarlatti - Sonata in B minor, K. 27 - Sara Daneshpour
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 30 май 2011
- Sara Daneshpour performs Scarlatti - Sonata in B minor K. 27 at the Arthur Rubinstein Piano Master Competition (May, 2011, Tel Aviv).
Since its inception in 1974, the Arthur Rubinstein International Piano Master Competition is one of the foremost Piano Competitions in the world. Arthur Rubinstein, who gave his blessing to the competition, headed the jury of the first two competitions (1974 & 1977).
The competition, is held every three years in Tel Aviv, Israel.
Subscribe for more classical piano music videos: / athurrubinstein
www.arims.org.il 
Видеоклипы
One of my favorites of Scarlatti's many beautiful sonatas, his music puts me in a unique place of both deep thought and profound rest.
Do parts of it remind you a little of Schubert? At times it's like he was existing 100 years in the future.
@@jakes3799 Wrong, the opposite is true. Scarlatti had a huge influence on later Musicians like Chopin and Schubert etc.
@@omron9498Of course Scarlatti influenced Chopin and Schubert rather than the other way around. Scarlatti came first. But it's still surprising that a composer who lived during the Baroque and early Classical period composed music that at times sounded like it came from the early Romantic period.
Same happens to me...
I find this lady's performance exquisite, so beautifully phrased and articulated.
She missed 2 notes in the beginning
@@leonardotitta4052 Does it matter? It's still superb.
@@leonardotitta4052 Butthead
A wonderful sonata, beautifully played by Ms. Daneshpour. Thank you.
I've listened to many recordings of this piece by different pianists on the internet, and this is by far the best. Daneshpour plays the piece musically, with sensitivity, not just hammering out the notes. Although the piece is often given a faster metronome mark, Daneshpour has taken it at a slightly slower speed, which brings out the beauty of the piece so well.
ikr?
Agree 100%
I had just recently discovered this piece and I agree, she plays it emotionaly and melodicaly while other pianists just play it very rithmically and too fast.
Yeah I keep getting back to this performance. Goat in my mind
Who exactly is hammering the notes? Gileles? Michelangeli? Tell us ..genius.
It is already known that this piece was composed for harpsichord and there are some people debating speed or expression. She has chosen the Murray Perahia style to whom after I heard and saw an interview discussing about transferring or adapting harpsichord music to piano, I got it know that, it gives to musicians the chance to create and apply the nature and options of the new instrument (the same J. S. Bach used to adapt pieces from harpsichord to lute or to violin as he also did some retouching on Vivaldi pieces), which it is to my taste extremely beautiful. She shows great quality and a new way of expressions that it is really welcomed and definitively colorful.
Great musicians deny to apply piano advantages as pedals, piano or forte alternations, and, even, in Scarlatti's original scores there are not tempo specifications, so that, it includes the freedom to apply the tempo speed to the musician's preference.
I LOVE THIS!! Such a great piece and a GREAT pianist!
Why isnt Scarlatti more popular?
Yessss. I do not understanvd too . Scarlatti us fantastic Genius... hundreds of the sonatas are so nice
Exactly. Although he has his weaknesses, like in this sonata: 0:40 to 0:44, or 0:51 to 1:00. Not very inspired.
@@aaronsilva2282 Bach and Scarlatti were both born in 1685
Henri Pelissier You may have missed the point here; in the second of your examples, the pianist has simplified considerably Scarlatti’s specific and quite challenging crossed hands and switches between left and right hand - it’s a technical thing in something that Scarlatti did actually call an ‘essercizi’.
@@elaineblackhurst1509 I think I have missed nothing , as I'm learning to play this sonata myself. I refer to the simple going down of the same chord (like a teenager strumming them on a guitar) or repeating it. Boring musically speaking. Bach would never have done that.
We are very happy to announce that the 14th Arthur Rubinstein International Piano Master Competition will be streamed live!
The competition is being held on the 13th of May through the 29th, and this year we are holding an especially joyful celebration: the competition's 40th anniversary!
Subscribe to our channel for more updates:
ruclips.net/user/AthurRubinstein
Wonderful...
Bravo, Sara !
Lovely playing, people critical of notes not sounding is rubbish. This is real live playing, the music is the only thing you listen to, top international players often play loads of wrong notes. This lady has real quality. Steve Eccles.
Yes, people sometimes miss notes. But this one was chronic, and in open-textured music like Scarlatti, missing one or two is noticeable but forgiveable; more than that is not.
Also apart from many notes missing. Variations in tempo and toucher are quite ad hoc and do not really support the piece's architecture
dude, bullshit, they literally do not sound, so unless it is due to the recording tech used, it is a problem
@@gandalfthegray4592 Right? I noticed it immediately, it's a problem
true. Sometimes when you hesitate a little bit when playing, a note may not sound.
very gentle with the counterpoint - lovely and thoughtful
Bravo Sara! you play it with tender inflexions and delicacy.
Gorgeous performance.
Such clever vocalisation! My attention didn't waver at all. Thank you for such a wonderful performance. :)
Breathtakingly beautiful, absolute perfection.
Beautiful
Wonderful
Thank you :)
Cuantas vivencias y recuerdos. Escuchaba con sólo cuatro años , esta sonata K.27 de Domenico Scarlatti , en un vinilo de mi padre ; con el pianista Robert Casadesus . Gracias por tan bella interpretación . Saludos desde Chile !🌹
Wunderschön gespielt! 💖💖💖BRAVISSIMA 👍👏👍👏👍👏👍👏👍👏
Sh does a fantastic job highlighting the melody
Wonderful❤❤❤
Amazing ❤😮👏
Bravo Dear Sara So Good Iranian Pianist I'm proud Of You ... !!❤🌹🌹🌹
Perfect tempo, smooth, bravo
Meravigliosa!
The is the most delicate (and I don't say that in a derogatory manner) interpretation of the Scarlatti K 27 that I've heard - really great voicing! God bless Daneshpour and Israel!
This is a gem of piece and a masterful performance.
Beautiful! 3:20 - 3:28 this turn/shift, or whatever it is, is devine!
You are not only beautiful but play exquisitely . Beautiful rendition of Scarlatti, gorgeous contrasts from left to right and lovely control . Bravo
great playing. she does great tricks with showing and hiding the upper voices. it is fresh and free, simple and magical. It's in my opinion the best version of this sonata on youtube.
To me, Sarah played this sonata the best!
Sublime.
Gorgeous dynamics, well-executed articulations, and very expressive melodic lines.
I love it.
Perfect pace of this piece for me!
Heavenly playing!
너무 좋네요🥰🥰
Bravo 👏 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
Even the song written in minor, the song feels happy
This is not a song as it is not a vocal composition. There are no words being sung.
I think it feels quite bitter-sweet
Very smartly shaped......Love the idea!
Wow.
That girl came from the heaven,It sounds perfectly!!!!Scarlati worked a lot on that!!
Прекрасно
@TDTech1 I think your comment requires justification. So she's plays with dynamics and a little pedal. So what? She also uses a great variety of articulation and gentle agogics, which, by the way, are the primary tools of the harpsichordist.
Hi, it's been 8 years... how are you?
Belleza
Wow im iranian and i also like scarlatti so much
❤️💕
Scarlatti's inspiration for this piece, and most of his pieces, was likely Spanish guitar music. You can hear the beautiful Andalucian cadences and other guitar features in this music, which Scarlatti translated into his keyboard music. Check out this guitar rendition:
ruclips.net/video/9KpkGD6ubGY/видео.html
Her playing and interpretation of the Scarlati is sublime. How did she go? :-)
0:33
Anyone know what level in CM Piano testing you should be to play this as one of your pieces.
Exurb1a, anyone??
hahaha, I'm busted :p
Yes
el diablo could you tell me what video it was? I am new to Exurb1a and I’m curious what it is :D !
Something with meaning in life, you can just google, exurb1a scarlatti
@@unanaspig "meaning is a jumper you knit yourself"
Exquisite playing, flows with the greatest of ease.
Bravo Sarita
delicata e struggente .... questa sonata....mio dio Scarlatti mi mette una malinconia: Ottima interpretazione
Sensitivity and intelligence at the service of the music.
I like how the repeated notes seem to fade away at points, initially vigorous but slowly overshadowed more and more by the others.
Hey baby xx
hey guy's witch piano model is he using it sounds great
@TDTech1 With all respect, we cannot play baroque music on a piano the same way we would on a harpsichord, which limits you in what you can do with the dynamics of the piece. The piano allows you render the piece with a more personal imprint. Besides, her articulation is still conservative for this type of music.
1:01 is it me or are those high notes not registering?
Where did this Sonata come from? It sounds nothing like the Sonatas that he wrote before or after it.
Well Done lovely Iranian Woman.
멋있다
David, you are absolutely right. But it is almost if she is playing Bach.
00:33
Yo estoy tocando esa bella melodía y la verdad es un reto para mi y espero seguir prosperando
In my opinion I think this piece should be played slower. I have played this peace many times.
바로크의 향기가 ~
The way I like it more: highligting the lyricism of this piece
Esecuzione troppo "moscia".
Per me lo standard reference resta sempre l'interpretazione di Benedetti Michelangeli !
E non lo dico per motivi nazionalistici... ;o)
Hai ragione al 100%
Oldville Non sono d’accordo; l’esecuzione di Michelangelo è orribile, troppo veloce e senza sentimento - solo un esercizio di virtuosismo.
Nicola Triggiani Vedi il mio commento sopra.
B - B flat!!!
She is used to lighter keys, notice how at the beginning 0:40 when she throws her left hand over her right to play the iterating note, she only properly presses 1 / 4
-> Dante Valjean
That is a matter of opinion. I prefer this performance to Michelangeli's
I agree. It is beautifully played and at just the right tempo. Neither ridiculousy fast (michelangeli) nor a little but too slow (Gilels). Interesting that a relative unknown makers a (much) better job of it than those two piano legends!
me obligan a ver esto
افتخار ایران زنده باشی😍😍😍😍❤❤❤❤
h moll !!! B minor ?
same thing...
Ritchie Diamond i am not sure whats the issue about but i will try to clarify the (B & H )Notes , in baroque era there was a note called ( H ) : the origin of this note is germany during the baroque era , In baroque Musical definiton ( B note = B flat note ) & ( H note = B NATURAL NOTE ) ^____^
I think that the first half is in d major and the second half is in b minor
scarlatti222
Don’t complicate things with unnecessary, irrelevant and misleading ‘detail’.
B minor is English;
h moll is German;
they mean the same thing.
Начало 0:34
not technically perfect but nice and colorful
Perfection is ugly
Fantastic. Similar to Pletnev version the best for me.
lovely, a very feminine take on this piece.
what is that supposed to mean?
@@phoebuskyriakoudis7412 Lovely means attractive/beautiful and feminine means having the qualities of femininity -delicacy, beauty, gentleness, prettiness (Cambridge) . This version is the opposite of the performance history of this piece which is usually played fast and agitato, focusing on the anxious mood in the left hand and aggressive leaping staccato suspensions in the right hand. This version is slower, gentle and delicate. It downplays the aggressive/anxious staccato elements of the piece in favor of a courtly dance mood. It is a conscious choice open to the performer as Scarlatti did not give very clear interpretative markings.
@@raphaelhudson I don't believe a performance can be gendered like you described. Just because it's delicate and gentler than other performances and it's played by a woman doesn't mean that it can be described as feminine. Had it been a male performer who had played it the exact same way, I'm pretty sure you wouldn't have made that comment. Supposing there are, however, gendered performances of music, perpetuating those stereotypes created by culture regarding what qualities belong to each gender isn't gonna help anyone in this day and age. No offence to the performance itself, I actually really liked her rendition of Scarlatti as it's an approach I myself welcome in my performances of his sonatas; but I think we can leave words like feminine and masculine out of the discussion.
@@phoebuskyriakoudis7412 Wow you really are looking for something to get upset about aren't you? Feminine is a common descriptive word that is accurate in this instance. The dictionary literally defines the word as being the qualities you are claiming do not designate the word. There are thousands of years of literature and musical analysis with men and women happily using the word in that sense without any such childish connotations as you are searching to find.
Society gains no benefit from taking faux virtue signalling offense to expressions. Men, animals, objects, music and even aliens are perfectly capable of instantiating qualities of any kind, it has nothing to do with the gender of the person performing it. The word is accurate and useful.
Your analysis is as shallow as it is presumptuous.
Raphael Hudson
Some interesting points in your discussion.
You might of course add that the substantial bulk of Scarlatti’s 555 sonatas were in fact written specifically for one particular woman - Maria Barbara, Princess of Portugal, and later Queen of Spain to whom Scarlatti was the long-time music master.
Wow I really don't like the pause at 2:00 at all, though.
I can not play piano, but having listened to many artists, I can say here is a lot to work on
How so?
Is there anything more beautiful than elegant female hands titillatingly touching the keys of a shiny Steinway?
0:43 no tone she didnt press the key hard enough, hammer didnt hit the string, but nevertheless a very good playing
Some of the notes were too soft to be heard... And she did not really bring out the upper voice.
Hey Fellow Exurb1a fans
Very beautiful, the song was not bad either
It's not right! So the Americans!!! h moll
just perfect for me , not too slow like Gilels, not too speed like MIchelangeli (he is like a mechanical robot), with a beautiful sensitive approach
Listen to Peraia!
Michelangeli wasn't a robot, was a genius. His Scarlatti was as excepcional as the rest of the repertoire he played
Gilels and Michelangeli are as unendurable as each other in this sonata; in completely different ways, both make horrendous misjudgements about the character of this sonata and produce performances that are as horrible as they are tasteless and embarrassing.
Only Giles can compete.
I must admit, whilst played with beautiful tone, voicing and phrasing I find the interpretation a bit too romantic, with too much pedal and rubato. I'm definitely not against using pedal in baroque: If we play baroque music on a modern piano we can use the tools we have, in my opinion. In this performance I felt that there was a shift between a baroque and romantic soundscape between passages, so the interpretation was not quite consistent.
Go to Benedetti Michelangeli performing this same sonata...He's in a class if his own albeit
his rendition might sound extremely personal.
Arturo Benedetti Michelangeli is better!!
Michelangeli's interpretation is too fast...
troppo veloce,manca di sentimento
Sorry but i dont agrée.... i dont like the she suddenly plays very slowly... and then more quickly. It s too much 🥴 Not sûre it is in the scarlatti' spirit ... may be à kind of romantism but Scarlatti is not à romantic music writer 🤪
But i like her playing very clear and singing notes 🤗
No no no.... Sara así no....
nooooooooooo i don't like for me
No.
Complete disregard for the era in which the piece was composed...
Too slow