My brother served in military in ww3. We used to play football and read stories together. He served as volunteer in this war and very day used to sent us letters, but we haven't got any since the battle of Hamburg God bless him. Since the conflict has ended, the world has become the greater place. I really want to see him again
i like how this isn't those basic oldass ww3 coldwar mapping videos where the plot is literally the soviets conquering most of europe and then nato realizes they exist and naval invades them.
In reality it would have escalated to a full scale nuclear exchange within days if not hours. The 7 days to the Rhine plan involved using nukes from the start. And the US would have responded in kind with both sides quickly escalating. And with 47,500 nuclear warheads flying around everyone would find out if the afterlife was real or not.
Maybe. Then again, the plan also assumed that nato strikes the Warsaw pact first, using tactical nuclear weaponry and advancing into east germany. The plan was meant to be a counter-attack.
@@korvmaster229 Let's think about that for a second. NATO strikes the Warsaw pact in a surprise attack. But doesn't hit any of the major bases, airfields and command centers where all the soviet armies would have been. Allowing them to launch a massive counterattack. I don't see how such a premise makes any sense. If NATO leadership was insane enough to launch the first strike they would have gone all inn. And in turn the Soviets would have responded with everything as well. The end result being the northern hemisphere being glassed into oblivion. There is no scenario where a conventional war wouldn't quickly devolve into a nuclear exchange.
Well not everyone would find out if the afterlife exists in a nuclear exchange, the “nuclear winter” is only a theory that some scientists don’t think would actually happen
@@robertalaverdov8147 i think they assumed that if they counter-nuked the invading NATO-divisions, that it would even the playing field, allowing for a counterattack, even if their own divisions were similarly damaged(idk if it would work, im just saying, that was the plan). Also, they assumed that NATO would not strike the soviets directly, and instead only strike the soviet troops residing in eastern germany, and their supply lines in poland.
Thank you man! This is an ideal articulation how I thought the scenario would be like. The music goes hand to toe with the events, and this has made ot a thousand times better! Liked, and subscribed!
In here, Spain joined a bit later, not immediately, and there was no Comintern. Mongolia, China, Vietnam and North Korea joined because they were Allies of the Soviet Union.
@@fadingblack272 China wasn't allies with the Soviets in 70s they had border conflicts also North Korea was more aligned with the Chinese. Mongolia- yeah they're most likely to join since they're part of Soviet bloc but it won't be that significant anyway. Vietnam? Unlikely, sure they were allied with the Soviets but i dont think they can do much anyway, especially after grueling Vietnam war which was gruesome for both USA and Vietnamese. At best i can see the Soviets use their naval base in Vietnam but that would be bombed by American bombers based in Phillipines anyway.
Your talent is very much shown in each new video. You have amazing content, and I look forward to every upload, thanks for being so good at what you do man
Maybe a suggestion could be for a ww4 scenario in like the 2000s or something from this universe onwards. Maybe even the interwar period if you can be bothered. If you make a successful invasion of the UK in that video, I will put baked beans, pineapple, human teeth and a cat’s ear on pizza.😊
I believe 1961 would've been a better start date as that was when world tensions were at its zenith. By 1977, tensions were decreasing and while there was a lot of tension, it was WAY less than in 1961.
Least realistic frankly the idea of a south Korean D-day is pretty stupid considering that the Chinese and the Koreans have an overwhelming numerical superiority and in the 1977 china already have nukes
I like to imagine that the USSR literally failed to invade Yugoslavia because Tito mobilized millions of his Partisans to resist the Soviet take over of Beograd.
Guerrilla warfare in real life is broken , specially when the partisans who served un ww2 still Alive. Ando now imaginé That with NATO support , the soviet suplys. in yugoslavia would be cooked 🗣️
another question is just why they invaded yugoslavia? like they’re already losing and they add millions of troops to nato by invading a neutral country
@@dominien6487 that would be un case Instnbull falls , now the soviets control the medditerraneam sea , and imagine when the chinnese send around of 2-3 soldiers to help I'm the european front.
I think In the 1970s there were no factors that almost caused World War 3 right? What I know was that the moment during the Cold War that almost caused World War 3 was during the Cuban Missile Crisis
There were also two others. One of witch, the soviets found an error on their radars, two of the people there said they should fight back, 1 person said no, so they didnt
There was in the 1970s: one was the Yom Kippur War in 1976 and the other was some error with US machines that said that the Soviet Union sent nukes, but it was confirmed it didn’t happen in 1979
At 3:13 if Turkey had lost these land IRL it would surrendered a while ago as its Capital Ankara and biggest city Istanbul are already in Soviet control and half of whats blue is the Kurdish region who wants to separate from Turkey.
China probably wouldn't have sided with the soviets. relations between China and the Soviet Union had not yet normalized from the sino soviet split. and wouldnt do so till until the late 80s
Neither Romania nor Poland. Romania would have despised the war, being an opponent of the Soviet Union, and the Poles would have gone into a civilwar if they have joined the war
@@SteinhummelYT not really, Romania and Poland was still in Soviet bloc and warsaw pact. Also saying civil war would happen is dumb, the communist government was still in tight control of these countries, solidarity party wouldn't gain major power in Poland until late 80s.
Anyone not gonna mention Vietnam and China on the same side? They literally went to war in our timeline. 1979. Failed petty Chinese invasion of a war torn Vietnam.
Я не фанат ссср, но я люблю правду. В СССР в 1945 году армия была 12 миллионов, тут же всего-то 6 миллионов, и перевес НАТО оправдан ядерным оружие, такое ощущение что в СССР его не было, ядерного оружия было наоборот больше в СССР, особенно средней дельности. И как же не логично устроена атака СССР, не закрыл ещё фронт, о надо новый открыть, потом стопориться на новом фронте, и о надо новый открыть.
North america is involved through the U.S, so that makes NA, europe, and asia. Only missing continents are africa and south america. Guess that COULD be enough to be considered a world war.
@@billypen6680just because they're involved doesn't mean there is a war there, there was little wars to be fought in NA. in that logic korean war was world war 3 because UN got militarily involved in korea
there was, the warsaw pact was dissolved. though personally I think the USSR would have a way harsher treatment, like new government and territories lost. so germany after ww2 basically
wtf is that scenario bro, i mean its just makes no sense, how the fuck south korea defeated CHINESE AND NORTH KOREAN ARMY WITH 100-200 K ARMY, WHEN CHINA AND NORTH KOREA HAD 400-500??? I mean, Soviet Union have WAYYY too more army than 6 million, they have atleast 10 millions, and how did Turkey got lost half of its country, lost constantinople and Ankara counterattacked? Its just makes no sense at all.
That's the purpose of simulation lil bro, remember, not everytime you get everything. Because even if you prepare for something, if you got bad luck, that resources for doing it was for nothing.
@@КуртКобейн-т6ц Well act civil, everyone makes me mistakes, and don't forget to factor the reliability of the equipment, in Ukraine-russia conflict today, it's showed that the cheap russian tanks were basically made out of cardboard, incompetence showing everywhere, and possibly, the technology they showing us could potentially is a myth, like china just basically copying everything that us made.
@@КуртКобейн-т6ц Even on ground forces and naval forces, USA already have advantages, as USA's navy was already the most powerful in the world with multiple of them in the entire world, air is also the same with it's entire fleet of f-15s, f-16s, etc. etc., while unlike the soviet and chinese counterparts, they don't have much experience and mostly copied from the western weapons, especially china. Russia and China mostly rely on numbers, while the west were mostly on the reliability of the equipment, explaining why Russia's tanks were weak to even stop a atgm from ifv. Not only that, but since the West knows they rely on numbers, They have insane stockpiles of weapons, tanks, air fleet, ammo's etc. during the cold war if war were to erupt, so yes, the technology advantages goes to the west, while the east got the numbers, possibly slow the push but not stop the push or go into an offensive in Europe front.
their army would steamrolled Western Europe whilst their air force gets dogged on, basically meaning nothing because the industrial military complex would surpass the Soviet production level in like, 24 hours
@@somerandomboibackup6086Kinda overexaggerating on 24 hours but youre not wrong. USSR could speed their way on taking big chunks of western europe. But NATO's superior technology especially in aircraft would slow them down. NATO's population and industry is way bigger than WP's so over the course of the war NATO would easily outnumber them in terms of soldiers and equipment. The fact that NATO's equipment was better aswell would make it clear who would win in the end. Until they both decide to use nukes and everyone loses.
I like how you made neither side decisively win, like how most of these generic WWIII videos do. I find this to be a pretty realistic outcome to a nukeless WWIII. The front just stagnates with Nato making minimal gains, and the fight just comes to a close with one side exhausting and suing for peace without any wars of annihilation. It's just too costly to direct invade mainland Russia (We know how that went for practically everybody, except Imperial Germany I guess?), or Britain for that matter. Both are impenetrable fortresses of their respective side of Europe.
They weren't aligned with the east, but collaborated with the west in many wars, they were commie but more american aligned than Soviet aligned, the soviets needed to attack Yugoslavia to seize their manpower, resources and get access to the Adriatic sea to launch air raids to Italy, so they western collaboration was enough for an invasion
just put in yt the following: ЖЕСТЬ!!! САМАЯ МОЩНАЯ И ЖЕСТКАЯ ВОЕННАЯ МУЗЫКА!!! You will find this exact song, copying this into spotify will result in nothing. For spotify try : Лето 41
This would've more likely happened in 1983 since yk, able archer 83 (incase you dont know, able archer is a terrifyingly realistic military exercise between nato countries and soviets thought this was an actual military invasion)
@@ri12i42 ww2 ended in 1945. do you really think that all of the soviet soldiers that served in ww2 would be still in the army in the late 70s? also, the reason they have only 6 million here is because they're constantly suffering casualties.
@@Italian_MapperYou do not underestimate the army of the USSR. To mobilize the population in the event of a full-scale war, they will be able to significantly increase the size of the army to 8 million. And they will be equipped with tanks and armored personnel carriers. While the speed of mobilization of Western countries is much lower, and while they are collecting armies, the USSR will already reach Brest. But considering that the USSR could not reach it, it means that the Western countries were the first to start the war, or in every possible way provoked
@@tolyayt7784NATO can produce way better than the Soviets and sure, they might be inferior in military, but NOT in technology. Their Air Force would crush the Soviets, and their logistics would also crush the Soviets. Also USA had better tanks than Soviets
Soviets had the upper hand in late 1940s (when millions of troops were directly bordered with the allied front) but once time went they wouldn’t be able to cross French borders again
@@DavidNaval NATOs supply route is coming across the sea, USSRs isnt. Alot of those supply ships too would be sunk leading to massive logistical problems for NATO in europe. Another problem is fighting an army 1-2M bigger than you which will be trained due to soviet constant war readiness conditions and troop rotations, is that it is almost impossible to charge their lines. On the technological superiority factor, I doubt it would be extreme in any way in europe, Anti-tank weapons would kill any tank, and as the soviets have more they can destroy more tanks, which NATO also has less of
@@Franon_4869What tactics? The Soviets also had their own tactics of warfare, so what? How is it worse than NATO tactics? The Soviets practiced much more tactics in combat operations without the use of weapons of mass destruction, while NATO tactics relied on tactical nuclear strikes.
@@tolstoy4328 the ussr had to import food from the United States despite that, people starved in the Soviet Union for the first 30 years of its existence and it only ended after the ussr endddd its isolationism
Even tho Yugoslavia is communist they kind of hate the soviets and probably if the soviets kept advancing they would have put them in their sphere of influence (something which the Soviets tried historically but were resisted by the Yugoslavs)
![Half-Life 2 Mapping Scenario 2001-2050 [REMASTERED]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n4O5wLRy5V8/mqdefault.jpg)
why is NATO a member of NATO
Fr😂
Real 💀
Because it just is God dammit
Should've Put Netherlands Instead
Lol
My brother served in military in ww3. We used to play football and read stories together. He served as volunteer in this war and very day used to sent us letters, but we haven't got any since the battle of Hamburg
God bless him. Since the conflict has ended, the world has become the greater place. I really want to see him again
Ermm what the sigma 🥸
Ww3 aint started yet
@@DavidNovic "yet"
Dont worry..that shall soon become the truth..
@@DavidNovic what do you mean? Don't you remember 1977?
USSR and NATO: *invade Austria*
Austria: hold up, this was all your idea.
You live in Austria = Evryday is like the Hunger Games💀💀☠
and then they're gonna call in their pal Germany to join... Oh wait...
bruh💀💀
one day we will reclaim the empire
tunisia algeria morrocco swizterland be like eating popcorn
i like how this isn't those basic oldass ww3 coldwar mapping videos where the plot is literally the soviets conquering most of europe and then nato realizes they exist and naval invades them.
Somehow the dday works
@@kirbydaclan4285 somehow Palpatine returned
half of them are the soviets reach spain then nato pushes them all the way to moscow
@@DavidNavalyeah but most realistic is they'll probably be stopped by France if soviet union and Poland if modern russia
@@Zegery"The dark side of the force is a pathway to many abilities some might consider... unnatural
POV Germany : Increases their military budget
Soviet Union : Ah shit here we go again
i refuse to belive bro created this by himself
@YTMenace1-neverasked💹
@YTMenace1-neverasked💹
@YTMenace1-neverasked lil bro is tweaking
@YTMenace1-neveraskedlil bro is tweaking off the devils lettuce
@YTMenace1-neverasked Who hurted lil bro to be yapping like that
Nice video
Your gonna get pinned
🤑🤑🤑
Bro paying his bills🤑🤑💰💸
It’s his son o:
W
In reality it would have escalated to a full scale nuclear exchange within days if not hours. The 7 days to the Rhine plan involved using nukes from the start. And the US would have responded in kind with both sides quickly escalating. And with 47,500 nuclear warheads flying around everyone would find out if the afterlife was real or not.
Maybe. Then again, the plan also assumed that nato strikes the Warsaw pact first, using tactical nuclear weaponry and advancing into east germany. The plan was meant to be a counter-attack.
@@korvmaster229 Let's think about that for a second. NATO strikes the Warsaw pact in a surprise attack. But doesn't hit any of the major bases, airfields and command centers where all the soviet armies would have been. Allowing them to launch a massive counterattack. I don't see how such a premise makes any sense. If NATO leadership was insane enough to launch the first strike they would have gone all inn. And in turn the Soviets would have responded with everything as well. The end result being the northern hemisphere being glassed into oblivion. There is no scenario where a conventional war wouldn't quickly devolve into a nuclear exchange.
Well not everyone would find out if the afterlife exists in a nuclear exchange, the “nuclear winter” is only a theory that some scientists don’t think would actually happen
@@robertalaverdov8147 i think they assumed that if they counter-nuked the invading NATO-divisions, that it would even the playing field, allowing for a counterattack, even if their own divisions were similarly damaged(idk if it would work, im just saying, that was the plan). Also, they assumed that NATO would not strike the soviets directly, and instead only strike the soviet troops residing in eastern germany, and their supply lines in poland.
@YTMenace1-neverasked💹
Thank you man! This is an ideal articulation how I thought the scenario would be like.
The music goes hand to toe with the events, and this has made ot a thousand times better! Liked, and subscribed!
E
E
0:40 Austria: *my neutrality has been violated*
Dude, your music is absolutely awesome!
I watch many overhead war scenarios, but I seriously feel the tension in your vids the most!
Spain joined NATO in 1982
and the Comintern was dissolved in 1943
In here, Spain joined a bit later, not immediately, and there was no Comintern. Mongolia, China, Vietnam and North Korea joined because they were Allies of the Soviet Union.
@@fadingblack272 ?
in a war against the USSR, Spain would obviously join against them
@@ptafonsofm that's debatable, but it certainly wasn't in NATO
@@fadingblack272 China wasn't allies with the Soviets in 70s they had border conflicts also North Korea was more aligned with the Chinese. Mongolia- yeah they're most likely to join since they're part of Soviet bloc but it won't be that significant anyway. Vietnam? Unlikely, sure they were allied with the Soviets but i dont think they can do much anyway, especially after grueling Vietnam war which was gruesome for both USA and Vietnamese. At best i can see the Soviets use their naval base in Vietnam but that would be bombed by American bombers based in Phillipines anyway.
bro, wake up, Italian mapper has uploaded a new video 🗣️🔥🔥🔥🗣️🔥🔥
Its the evening?
@@ChhonyeeGoh-gy4ibtime zones.
8:12 Romania: **Souvenirs from Austria-Hungary**
Edit: Thx for the 194 likes
@YTMenace1-neverasked💹
@YTMenace1-neverasked"never asked"
Its called tranzilvania
bro forgor that mountains exist
Transylvania @@agaro5
Well that was a unexpected upgrade
Bro, we need a new gang
Italian mapper: maps
Ayden George: music
Oversimplified: narrator
Your talent is very much shown in each new video. You have amazing content, and I look forward to every upload, thanks for being so good at what you do man
Maybe a suggestion could be for a ww4 scenario in like the 2000s or something from this universe onwards. Maybe even the interwar period if you can be bothered.
If you make a successful invasion of the UK in that video, I will put baked beans, pineapple, human teeth and a cat’s ear on pizza.😊
eermm what the sigma?
Real what the sigma
I said that as soon as i saw the title 😂
Real
@MecklenburgMapsTruer words have never been spoken
erm are you from ohio 😂😂😂 cuz you got a level 10 gyatt 😂😂😂
Thank you for doing this!
Yeah, your right
Bro replied to himself
What programs do you use to make such interesting videos? How about the idea of making a whole guide on this topic?)
I believe 1961 would've been a better start date as that was when world tensions were at its zenith. By 1977, tensions were decreasing and while there was a lot of tension, it was WAY less than in 1961.
1960s or 1980s is perfect
i love HOI4 mapping style
@YTMenace1-neveraskedand what of your opinion?
@YTMenace1-neverasked💹
@YTMenace1-neverasked💹
@YTMenace1-neverasked 🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🔨🔨🔨🔨
I like how we went from serious war political terms talking to Internet slang 😂
Great work, most realistic scenario out there
Least realistic frankly the idea of a south Korean D-day is pretty stupid considering that the Chinese and the Koreans have an overwhelming numerical superiority and in the 1977 china already have nukes
The goat posted❤
You should make a "What if Poland joined the Axis in 1939" scenario
i mean.. unless germany is head over heels for poland, its gonna be unrealistic af. war with poland is inevitable
Poland joining the axis means the war is prevented lol
@@asirry3144 I was thinking more of a scenario where Germany still invades the west, then the USSR along with Poland and maybe wins the war
@@deerdude1or what if Germany and Poland team up against the Soviet Union
Poland loosing so hard they ahh switched teams
Greatest video from the greatest mapper
I like to imagine that the USSR literally failed to invade Yugoslavia because Tito mobilized millions of his Partisans to resist the Soviet take over of Beograd.
Guerrilla warfare in real life is broken , specially when the partisans who served un ww2 still Alive.
Ando now imaginé That with NATO support , the soviet suplys. in yugoslavia would be cooked 🗣️
another question is just why they invaded yugoslavia? like they’re already losing and they add millions of troops to nato by invading a neutral country
what is the song at 6:43?
description
Red alert Soviet march
Red alert 3 Soviet march
Can You make as well a scenario like this where Warsaw Pact wins ?
they would never win lol
it’s supposed to be realistic bro
Litteraly western countries would win without usa. Economical gap is too wide.
@@dominien6487 that would be un case Instnbull falls , now the soviets control the medditerraneam sea , and imagine when the chinnese send around of 2-3 soldiers to help I'm the european front.
NATO would win, it's very impossible for the Warsaw Pact's to win.
Pretty cool 🗣🔥
Fake comment bot
Bro humillated christopher 🗿
@YTMenace1-neverasked💹
@YTMenace1-neverasked💹
@YTMenace1-neveraskedguess what
Nobody has to ask, so you can shut up
in ur dreams
@@geograficosofc the only good thing about your country is fernanfloo
hi, youve got a new sub
I think In the 1970s there were no factors that almost caused World War 3 right? What I know was that the moment during the Cold War that almost caused World War 3 was during the Cuban Missile Crisis
Sorry about my English, because I’m using google translate from Bahasa indonesia to English
There were also two others. One of witch, the soviets found an error on their radars, two of the people there said they should fight back, 1 person said no, so they didnt
There was in the 1970s: one was the Yom Kippur War in 1976 and the other was some error with US machines that said that the Soviet Union sent nukes, but it was confirmed it didn’t happen in 1979
In total, there were 25 times nuclear war almost happened during the Cold War
@@orionhorizon yom kippur didn't almost cause ww3
Love how it’s always Bulgaria for the Greeks.
Bros living in a different universe 💀
At 3:13 if Turkey had lost these land IRL it would surrendered a while ago as its Capital Ankara and biggest city Istanbul are already in Soviet control and half of whats blue is the Kurdish region who wants to separate from Turkey.
american troops or other nato members would be occupying it if it did capitulate
China probably wouldn't have sided with the soviets. relations between China and the Soviet Union had not yet normalized from the sino soviet split. and wouldnt do so till until the late 80s
Neither Romania nor Poland. Romania would have despised the war, being an opponent of the Soviet Union, and the Poles would have gone into a civilwar if they have joined the war
I think, china do that because heself
China need to defending korea
@@SteinhummelYT not really, Romania and Poland was still in Soviet bloc and warsaw pact. Also saying civil war would happen is dumb, the communist government was still in tight control of these countries, solidarity party wouldn't gain major power in Poland until late 80s.
Anyone not gonna mention Vietnam and China on the same side? They literally went to war in our timeline. 1979. Failed petty Chinese invasion of a war torn Vietnam.
Italian Mapper never fails to keep us asking for more🥶🥶🥶🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🔊🔊🔊🔊🔊🔊🔊🔊🔊🔊
Exactly
Bro replied to his own comment💀💀💀
Bro replied to his own reply🏴☠️🏴☠️🏴☠️🏴☠️🏴☠️🏴☠️🏴☠️🏴☠️🏴☠️
Bro replied to his own reply of reply
I remember, my grandpa once said that when red army came into west germany, he grabbed a time machine and travelled to peaceful times
4:33 GET OU-
*Типичный Итальянец либераха, который конечно же создаст сценарий в котором НАТО одержал победу в третьей мировой.*
Because that wouldve happened without nuclear weapons
@@BetalerIkkeSkatt если почти сразу после 2 -ой мировой из за Черчилля
Возможно комунисты выиграли так как комунисты были популярны
russian bot lmao
Я не фанат ссср, но я люблю правду. В СССР в 1945 году армия была 12 миллионов, тут же всего-то 6 миллионов, и перевес НАТО оправдан ядерным оружие, такое ощущение что в СССР его не было, ядерного оружия было наоборот больше в СССР, особенно средней дельности. И как же не логично устроена атака СССР, не закрыл ещё фронт, о надо новый открыть, потом стопориться на новом фронте, и о надо новый открыть.
00:00 what is that name song?
calls it a world when i only see asia and europe and a huge amount of countries just watching the war
North america is involved through the U.S, so that makes NA, europe, and asia. Only missing continents are africa and south america. Guess that COULD be enough to be considered a world war.
@@billypen6680just because they're involved doesn't mean there is a war there, there was little wars to be fought in NA. in that logic korean war was world war 3 because UN got militarily involved in korea
@@billypen6680 you know what does world war mean ? WORLD WAR
@@bocci103sierra 7 pfp lol
really cool, it feels realistic... no aftermath map though? i'm so curious about treaties!
there was, the warsaw pact was dissolved. though personally I think the USSR would have a way harsher treatment, like new government and territories lost. so germany after ww2 basically
How do you animate the date at the top of the screen? Do you change it manually in each photo?
wtf is that scenario bro, i mean its just makes no sense, how the fuck south korea defeated CHINESE AND NORTH KOREAN ARMY WITH 100-200 K ARMY, WHEN CHINA AND NORTH KOREA HAD 400-500??? I mean, Soviet Union have WAYYY too more army than 6 million, they have atleast 10 millions, and how did Turkey got lost half of its country, lost constantinople and Ankara counterattacked? Its just makes no sense at all.
That's the purpose of simulation lil bro, remember, not everytime you get everything. Because even if you prepare for something, if you got bad luck, that resources for doing it was for nothing.
@@КуртКобейн-т6ц Well act civil, everyone makes me mistakes, and don't forget to factor the reliability of the equipment, in Ukraine-russia conflict today, it's showed that the cheap russian tanks were basically made out of cardboard, incompetence showing everywhere, and possibly, the technology they showing us could potentially is a myth, like china just basically copying everything that us made.
American airpower pretty much chews through soviet and Chinese manpower and stalls enough for America to reinforce their positions.
@@notsodeep1140 but in war u dont use airforce only??
@@КуртКобейн-т6ц Even on ground forces and naval forces, USA already have advantages, as USA's navy was already the most powerful in the world with multiple of them in the entire world, air is also the same with it's entire fleet of f-15s, f-16s, etc. etc., while unlike the soviet and chinese counterparts, they don't have much experience and mostly copied from the western weapons, especially china. Russia and China mostly rely on numbers, while the west were mostly on the reliability of the equipment, explaining why Russia's tanks were weak to even stop a atgm from ifv. Not only that, but since the West knows they rely on numbers, They have insane stockpiles of weapons, tanks, air fleet, ammo's etc. during the cold war if war were to erupt, so yes, the technology advantages goes to the west, while the east got the numbers, possibly slow the push but not stop the push or go into an offensive in Europe front.
The USSR would probably have collapsed in the early 1980s in this timeline
their army would steamrolled Western Europe whilst their air force gets dogged on, basically meaning nothing because the industrial military complex would surpass the Soviet production level in like, 24 hours
@@somerandomboibackup6086 что за расчëт интересно такой? 24 часа
@@lichking3805 assuming US still relies on M60s but USSR moves away from T-55s, T-62s
@@lichking3805 also don't get started on aircrafts
@@somerandomboibackup6086Kinda overexaggerating on 24 hours but youre not wrong. USSR could speed their way on taking big chunks of western europe. But NATO's superior technology especially in aircraft would slow them down. NATO's population and industry is way bigger than WP's so over the course of the war NATO would easily outnumber them in terms of soldiers and equipment. The fact that NATO's equipment was better aswell would make it clear who would win in the end. Until they both decide to use nukes and everyone loses.
Excellent 👌
Bro its ✨🌟 AMAZING🌟✨ the story, map and just idk what to say! Its really good! 🇮🇹💪🏻🗿
Your videos constantly get better and better,Keep it up!
why did world war 3 only lasted a year, (1977-1978), like i am pretty sure it would have lasted 3 to 5 years,
If not counting nuclear war
Bro , you are the best ❤
5:15 If it's 1977 South Vietnam Would Rebel Because they were occupied 2 Years ago
I like how you made neither side decisively win, like how most of these generic WWIII videos do. I find this to be a pretty realistic outcome to a nukeless WWIII. The front just stagnates with Nato making minimal gains, and the fight just comes to a close with one side exhausting and suing for peace without any wars of annihilation. It's just too costly to direct invade mainland Russia (We know how that went for practically everybody, except Imperial Germany I guess?), or Britain for that matter. Both are impenetrable fortresses of their respective side of Europe.
6:16 Yugoslavia took betrayal To a whole Other level
And instantly regretted it
@@SwindlerTheyeah bro😂
They weren't aligned with the east, but collaborated with the west in many wars, they were commie but more american aligned than Soviet aligned, the soviets needed to attack Yugoslavia to seize their manpower, resources and get access to the Adriatic sea to launch air raids to Italy, so they western collaboration was enough for an invasion
I'm pretty sure they got invaded
if I got a penny for every time italian mapping used the first song I'd have atleast a dollar
WW3 : ends
Switzerland : Lets try communism
Nato: Shut up Switzerland
Switzerland: aw...
Omg wow the best video out of this dude yet, I love the nuclear war text lol 🤣🤣🤣🤣
How did you make this?
paint.net
@@Italian_Mapper oh and how did you do the number thing? if you dont mind me askin
adobe after effects
5:52
How someone should read that so fast?
lmao i didnt even notice that mistake
@@Italian_Mapper Thats why im here 😂 Besides that its a Perfect Video ❤️ Sehr gute Arbeit💪🏼
Game name plss😢@@Italian_Mapper
@@Italian_Mapper thes very good video❤
nice vid lil bro
6:20 gotta love the red march now
What is the name of the audio that plays at the beginning of the video?
it's in the description
my father fought in that one, he was the best soviet general o7
Soviets: Reaches the rhine
France: HEY SHITASS (Pluton-Missile.mp4)
This actually seems realistic enough
This qualifies as a good mapping video :D
Love this
What is the first song name in 00:00
just put in yt the following: ЖЕСТЬ!!! САМАЯ МОЩНАЯ И ЖЕСТКАЯ ВОЕННАЯ МУЗЫКА!!!
You will find this exact song, copying this into spotify will result in nothing.
For spotify try : Лето 41
Great Video! But i hate the fact that Bułgaria doesn't own southern dobruzia
What do you use to make your maps?
paint .net
@@Italian_Mapper This is paint.net? Wowie-
@Italian_Mapper Huh, How do you do them like this?
Wrong upgrade i guess? From upgrade 19.77: Cold war, you should have dowland 19.78: Beggining of End of Cold war!😂
This would've more likely happened in 1983 since yk, able archer 83 (incase you dont know, able archer is a terrifyingly realistic military exercise between nato countries and soviets thought this was an actual military invasion)
Romania doesn't have south dorbich, Romania lost it after ww2
Well done man😊
What happened to the soviet's 30 million soldiers after ww2?
true what happened to the 30 millions?
They died
@@parasito199 ✅
How do they just die the video showed they had 6 mil where did the other 24 mil go?
@@ri12i42 ww2 ended in 1945. do you really think that all of the soviet soldiers that served in ww2 would be still in the army in the late 70s? also, the reason they have only 6 million here is because they're constantly suffering casualties.
cool next this but in 1983 during Able Archer
i feel like it would be the same thing but with less soviet success
@@DavidNaval probably but after ABLE ARCHER 83 more destruction And probably the whole world would be effected
im just asking, how did you you make this ?
i have a tutorial
Fc Mobile can wait!
Spoiler Alert when you press read more
Edit: That Turkish and Greek comeback was wild
Nice video and nice work! New subscriber keep it up!
Why did you give Southern Dobruja to Romania?
I think you should make a ww3 video all fronts in 2025, Good job bro!!!
european front would just end in like 2 weeks
Bruh.... In late 70s, early 80s, the USSR can't lose. The disparity is just too big.
are you understimating nato
@@Italian_MapperYou do not underestimate the army of the USSR. To mobilize the population in the event of a full-scale war, they will be able to significantly increase the size of the army to 8 million. And they will be equipped with tanks and armored personnel carriers. While the speed of mobilization of Western countries is much lower, and while they are collecting armies, the USSR will already reach Brest. But considering that the USSR could not reach it, it means that the Western countries were the first to start the war, or in every possible way provoked
@@tolyayt7784NATO can produce way better than the Soviets and sure, they might be inferior in military, but NOT in technology. Their Air Force would crush the Soviets, and their logistics would also crush the Soviets. Also USA had better tanks than Soviets
Soviets had the upper hand in late 1940s (when millions of troops were directly bordered with the allied front) but once time went they wouldn’t be able to cross French borders again
@@misterthompson that’s true
IVE BEEN WAITING FOR SO LONG TYSM 1000000/10 er, what the sigma
the soviets lost land with 1m more troops? how can you push the soviets with no numerical advantage, how can you even make offensives like that?
Better weapons
@@x5umm3rx And tactics
numbers aren’t everything, nato would have better trained soldiers with better equipment tactics and air superiority
@@DavidNaval NATOs supply route is coming across the sea, USSRs isnt. Alot of those supply ships too would be sunk leading to massive logistical problems for NATO in europe.
Another problem is fighting an army 1-2M bigger than you which will be trained due to soviet constant war readiness conditions and troop rotations, is that it is almost impossible to charge their lines.
On the technological superiority factor, I doubt it would be extreme in any way in europe, Anti-tank weapons would kill any tank, and as the soviets have more they can destroy more tanks, which NATO also has less of
@@Franon_4869What tactics? The Soviets also had their own tactics of warfare, so what? How is it worse than NATO tactics? The Soviets practiced much more tactics in combat operations without the use of weapons of mass destruction, while NATO tactics relied on tactical nuclear strikes.
nice video bro!
Can you make a modern world war scenario
In this scenario nato declare war on russia after they invaded crimea in 2022
nato wins gg, also it's 2012 when russia took crimea
@@sovietunion6172014*
Nuclear war lul
best quality mapping video of this specific 7 days to the rhine scenario good job
Now this guy has truly humiliated Christopher
What program do you use?
paint .net
6:20
7:47 welcome back Roman Empire
Zamnnnnn
Nk in 5:17 “ IVE PLAYED THESE GAMES BEFORE”
Allies kinda won so boring
Allies would always win
Why support communism and socialism when it destroys my country? 😕😔🇻🇪
What kinda app or wtv do you use for this
lol. its unreal. ussr stronger. have better tanks, more army, fighting spirit.
i do agree that the USSR is slightly more powerful than the USA in terms of military, but that's the entire warsaw pact we're talking about
No, the ussr would probably experience starvation if this war occured
@@ryanlobofan12 starvation? bro what??? ussr have huge agrar industry. if they stop export they would have a lot of food.
@@tolstoy4328 the ussr had to import food from the United States despite that, people starved in the Soviet Union for the first 30 years of its existence and it only ended after the ussr endddd its isolationism
Yeah but nato is a combination of strong countries especially the United states
6:16 Why did Yugoslavia joined NATO while being Communist?
Most likely the soviets moving in to capture Yugoslavia prompting their entry into NATO
Even tho Yugoslavia is communist they kind of hate the soviets and probably if the soviets kept advancing they would have put them in their sphere of influence (something which the Soviets tried historically but were resisted by the Yugoslavs)