Amazed at Watto’s justification that his top is too short “because he bought it today” - the only day, when you think about it, that a top should be a perfect fit
Upon hearing the "3 letters that go into an item of clothing" category, I have never been so sure of anything before that Key would end up walking on that. Bless that man.
What is Watto trying to tell us? He is clearly emphasising both Kitchen Conversions and the small triathlon top that he bought today. It's like watching a hostage video.
Love when Key fights a challenge to the death, is clearly wrong but limps on to hear a second challenge, to which he responds by walking instantly lol. Also did it with Desert Orchid, challenged for being on a circuit, limped on, challenged for having a muscle body, insta-walk
the whole crackle convo i was just screaming at the screen CANADA!! CANADAAAAA they're doing their "main thing" (promoting cereal) over there all the time, all that to end with cravat hahahahagjhcsdh
Since I watched this episode 3 weeks ago, the song at 22:40 has been playing in a loop in my head and I occassionally laugh out loud in the street. Please help.
I'd love to purchase (and then own) a mug or tee or fridge magnet or baseball cap or bottle opener or coaster or cycling jersey with the phrase "show me the script" upon it.
Delighted to have the set go down town, but in utter disbelief that Watto walked on collar... one of the lightest dismissals in recent memory. Still, good game, high quality lattice, looking forward to more of the same next week. Stick it up your arse & hope for the best.
Vicars aside, you can get crochet patterns for collars, and I know people sew their own so they are a legit distinct item in the same way that a tie or cravat are.
@@ben1210 Not gonna lie, this made me google if there was a French word 'spolier'. Spoiler alert: There is. It's 'despoil', which I just learned, isn't the same as un-spoiling something. Thank you for watching 'Laughing and learning BTL'.
Sideways, Watto... One spoon on the nose, vertical. Two spoons on the eyes, horizontal. You're a combined 180 degrees from achieving your goal. At the moment, you're just sticking cutlery into your face holes.
Knew straight away the Keenan category would come back to bite Key. He does tend to struggle to think about the implications of what he’s saying, unfortunately.
Put it in the diary: today is the day that the phrase 'carved me up like a fucking horse' entered the lexicon. I suspect we won't be hearing the last of it here.
I've seen Key be the guest comic on early Horne Section stage gigs, and it was always a chaotic delight... Signature move was to precariously balance an open beer bottle on the edge of the ride cymbal at the start introducing high tension early doors
A query: Are "name another" people up for challenge? As in do they have to fit in all pre-existing criteria, or are they purely a clarification on the new category?
I believe that, when you think about it, they're only for clarification and don't need to fit the other categories. Although I've never really thought about it before.
The "name anothers" are there to test/show that you actually ruled out a significant amount of people, so that it actually narrows it down, and not just by one person. For example if a player said "Mel Gibson: No more actors named Mel Gibson" the next could say "Bruce Willis: No more actors named Bruce Willis" and the game would go on forever. The "name anothers" don't have to fit all the preexisting categories, that would make the game very, very hard, as you would basically always have to think of at least two persons per round that aren't ruled out yet.
Key never used the word "play" when he gave his category he used the word "portray". And if one was to be really pedantic about it, a portrayal doesn't even have to be alive, as the sculpture Venus de Milo is a portrayal of the roman/greek goddess Venus/Aphrodite
I'm with Key on the Crackle portrayal refusal to walk. Because those looked like huge mascot costumes that were doing all the work. It's not just makeup, clothes, and acting.
Apologies if this has been asked before, but is T.A. Taskmaster's Assistant? I'm genuinely worried for Horne if that becomes something that sits over him. Over.
Category Spoilers 20:24 Mark’s chest hair is shaped like a heart Charlie Dimmock/Tommy Walsh no more found muddy Eddie the Eagle no more performed “main” activity in Canada Socrates/Leon Trotsky no more items of clothing starting with the first three letters of surname Mert Aksac/Benedict Wong no more actors Aesop no more names without repeated letters Grotbags no more evil Gareth Keenan no more characters portrayed by human Edward Elgar no more shown playing piano Willo the Wisp no more “funny” voices Crackle no more one mononymous people ~ item of clothing from first three letters … Key out Samuel Taylor Coleridge no more born in England ~ item of clothing from first three letters … Watto out Horne wins Set 5 Game 12
@@britishhedgehog So the people in costumes in some Disney musical aren't portraying characters ? Even if you go to something like Disney land the Big Head people pretend to be the characters for kids. (I don't mind Big Heads)
@@bearhustler I think Key's point that the big head Disney characters in your example would count, due to the 'musical'. Whereas, these crackley lads weren't being portrayed in any piece of fictional artwork (stage, TV, film, commercial, opera, etc). Hence it was nothing more than a dress-up and jolly. For instance, if I stuck play-doh all over my body for Halloween, surely that shouldn't count as Morph being portrayed by a human.
@@bearhustler they're not portraying human characters. The big head outfits aren't human. They're either a) over sized so not human or b) snap, crackle and pop are pixies anyway not humans
Could live without the songs I could live without the songs Poke a finger in my eye Could live without the songs Could live without the songs I could live without the songs Kiss me quick and say goodbye Could live without the songs
![Set 5, Game 13 [11.07.22] - No More Jockeys with Alex Horne, Tim Key + Mark Watson](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/laZUSPT3JUU/mqdefault.jpg)
![Set 5, Game 13 [11.07.22] – No More Jockeys with Alex Horne, Tim Key + Mark Watson](/img/tr.png)
![Live: Game 5 [11.11.21] - No More Jockeys with Alex Horne, Tim Key + Mark Watson](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/g0vQukRqRQY/mqdefault.jpg)
♫ In Canada 🇨🇦
Watching from Calgary, actually. Can confirm that the mouse doesn't squeak here.
@@scottbbaird I do wonder if this is the same mouse as seen in previous episodes of No More Jockeys
Watch out you don't get a copyright strike from South Park. *Blame Canada*
watching from Hogtown; can confirm, mouse doesn't squeak.
Speaking from Toronto, the ladies do often speak tho
Amazed at Watto’s justification that his top is too short “because he bought it today” - the only day, when you think about it, that a top should be a perfect fit
your tops dont grow downwards as they age?
@@drawnimo Do you not pay your cutlery?
I suppose it's a case of Mark shrinks by a shirt size every day.
At the risk of raking up some old leaves, clothing can stretch from wear and tear until the skin beneath the top is no longer bare.
most deranged i've seen Watto thus far. not even blinking when being told to Tell the Corridor. absolute scenes
Not a natural rule-breaker is old Watto, is he? 😆
absolutely steaming in this he is
Upon hearing the "3 letters that go into an item of clothing" category, I have never been so sure of anything before that Key would end up walking on that.
Bless that man.
What is Watto trying to tell us? He is clearly emphasising both Kitchen Conversions and the small triathlon top that he bought today. It's like watching a hostage video.
In Slough?
Wonder if his keepers are interested in the prawn curry
Love when Key fights a challenge to the death, is clearly wrong but limps on to hear a second challenge, to which he responds by walking instantly lol.
Also did it with Desert Orchid, challenged for being on a circuit, limped on, challenged for having a muscle body, insta-walk
I'm left feeling slightly unsatisfied by the teased Kitchen Conversions game that never materialised. Over.
When you think about it, considering the lads' fashion choices over the years, it's not surprising they don't know who Karl Lagerfeld is.
I’ll see you guys Downtown, cheering and hollering for Key! 🗝
LOVE Benny Wong as a name-another. Great actor
Two fun callbacks to NMJ in the latest Taskmaster:
1. Alex says "a big if" at one point
2. I recognise that vacuum cleaner :)
And the pronunciation of "alluring"!!!
when he said 'big if' in that live task, i shrieked
Key said “big if” on House of Games last week and wore a “Penelope” tshirt
@@sianaitken9266 I can't watch that show because the intense red in the graphics hurts my eyes.
Come on Key, 3 straight sets and you're a champ!
he was 100% right re: crackle. thems just guys in suits.
@@drawnimo Yeah mascots aren't really acting, just being organic advertising
@@Aliasalpha They are, however, what you might call "portraying."
the whole crackle convo i was just screaming at the screen CANADA!! CANADAAAAA they're doing their "main thing" (promoting cereal) over there all the time, all that to end with cravat hahahahagjhcsdh
Yaaaaaaaaaas set 5 lives on. And I can relax for a week. Been a bag of nerves before watching the last 2 games...
🎶Ninetyyy seconds, you find a photo, they're holding a spaaade. ...John.🎶
I find it interesting that Tim's gardening job-glove isn't covered in mud.
Thanks for letting me know about the spade
9:57 The beauty of this game is you can play it at home
Classic key on the fight back with snap crackle and pop
🎶 Ninety seconds, you’ll find a photo they’re holding a spade. John. 🎶
Watto doesn't grow into his clothes; his clothes grow into him
Definitely with Key that Crackle hasn't been 'portrayed' by a human.
If there is no script, you must acquipt!
As an Irishman living in NZ, I really miss Taytos .
Since I watched this episode 3 weeks ago, the song at 22:40 has been playing in a loop in my head and I occassionally laugh out loud in the street. Please help.
Here we go, will Watto take it this week. I want him to win but I don't want the set to end, let's take it Downtown !
so many laughs this ep i hope Key comes back
I think they will have him back for the next one, yes ;).
I can't squeak for the mice, but we girls in Canada definitely do speak!
Crackle has definitely crackled (his main activity) in Canada
The first three categories legitimately gave me anxiety. Tough start to this one!
...Love that Tim said nearly the same thing just after I posted my comment
Glove Cravat !
Excellent look.
I'd love to purchase (and then own) a mug or tee or fridge magnet or baseball cap or bottle opener or coaster or cycling jersey with the phrase "show me the script" upon it.
Hotel Watto is Watto turned up to 11.
Delighted to have the set go down town, but in utter disbelief that Watto walked on collar... one of the lightest dismissals in recent memory. Still, good game, high quality lattice, looking forward to more of the same next week.
Stick it up your arse & hope for the best.
Vicars aside, you can get crochet patterns for collars, and I know people sew their own so they are a legit distinct item in the same way that a tie or cravat are.
Looks like we’re going, to your friend and mine, downtown, and I don’t mind it one bit
I love it when the lads are pissed, but the play in this vital match was quite loopy.
Absolutely missed opportunity to play some Elgar music in the background of this one.
Some of us are here for the Mahler.
gotta love a man in a semi crop top
I did not expect to hear Runcorn straight away hahaha
Keys cravat looking like BCDE or EFGA
I really hope this isn’t the last game of the set 🤞
Spolier alert...
I hope so too
@@ben1210 Not gonna lie, this made me google if there was a French word 'spolier'. Spoiler alert:
There is.
It's 'despoil', which I just learned, isn't the same as un-spoiling something.
Thank you for watching 'Laughing and learning BTL'.
Sideways, Watto... One spoon on the nose, vertical. Two spoons on the eyes, horizontal.
You're a combined 180 degrees from achieving your goal. At the moment, you're just sticking cutlery into your face holes.
Knew straight away the Keenan category would come back to bite Key. He does tend to struggle to think about the implications of what he’s saying, unfortunately.
That, in a nutshell, is Key's main problem...
Rules adjudication question:
Does the "name another" person also have to avoid all of the existing categories?
Rules adjudication answer: no, they don't
Put it in the diary: today is the day that the phrase 'carved me up like a fucking horse' entered the lexicon. I suspect we won't be hearing the last of it here.
Teflon Tim become crumpled Key
Gareth Keenan is massive and he ain't made of plastic
"T.A." for "Taskmaster's Assistant"?
Wonder how Key and Watto would get on in the Horne Section? Because if this is their audition I don't think the boss is gonna go for it.
Big if.
I've seen Key be the guest comic on early Horne Section stage gigs, and it was always a chaotic delight... Signature move was to precariously balance an open beer bottle on the edge of the ride cymbal at the start introducing high tension early doors
Gareth Keenan was caught in the web
0:50 ..psychology? .. electromagnetic? .. ... dreams?
Pissed Watto looks like resting Cantona
7:39 Interesting lattice
A query:
Are "name another" people up for challenge? As in do they have to fit in all pre-existing criteria, or are they purely a clarification on the new category?
I believe that, when you think about it, they're only for clarification and don't need to fit the other categories. Although I've never really thought about it before.
The "name anothers" are there to test/show that you actually ruled out a significant amount of people, so that it actually narrows it down, and not just by one person. For example if a player said "Mel Gibson: No more actors named Mel Gibson" the next could say "Bruce Willis: No more actors named Bruce Willis" and the game would go on forever. The "name anothers" don't have to fit all the preexisting categories, that would make the game very, very hard, as you would basically always have to think of at least two persons per round that aren't ruled out yet.
Elgar toured Canada in 1911.
Sorry, why wasn't Gareth Keenan challenged on?
Indeed, he must have thrown a spade at some stage
Yes, it is to short!
what are the odds key would have walked if challonge'd on mert ... Merkin?
Would gou consider a wig an item of clothing?
@@NoukSilver generally no, but it is sort of clothing adjacent. Not much further than a tie or a collar.
@@jameswoodish I think you are underrating the clothingness of ties and collars
That was my first thought as well. I don't think Key would've walked but it would have been a great argument
Zero because the category was first 3 characters of the surname, and his surname is Aksak
Alex rocking the Norn Tayto hat. The second best Tayto on the Island of Ireland.
BEST
Rachel is from Fermanagh, that's why
Key to win next three!
Portray: depict (someone or something) in a work of art or literature.
Definitely did not understand the repeated letters category. Over.
No more names with entirely unique letters, across the whole name (like aesop) it was worded with a double negative
@@camryn4092 so…. Grotbags???
@@katewhitestone2645 very confusing game this one, I’ve rewatched this like 4 times and still don’t get it
@@camryn4092 ha! I’m glad I’m not the only one 🤔😀
@@katewhitestone2645 to be fair to horne ive only just realized grotbags has two g’s lol
I can't believe I'm backing Key for once 18:15 "Playing someone" implies a scripted performance.
Key never used the word "play" when he gave his category he used the word "portray". And if one was to be really pedantic about it, a portrayal doesn't even have to be alive, as the sculpture Venus de Milo is a portrayal of the roman/greek goddess Venus/Aphrodite
No more Mostyn Clewd
Soft walk by watson, i feel he wanted to keep the set going. that or the top was pinching.
if you walk on cravat you walk on collar, they are from the same family
I'm with Key on the Crackle portrayal refusal to walk. Because those looked like huge mascot costumes that were doing all the work. It's not just makeup, clothes, and acting.
Jack Lizowski was even a bizarre suggestion ... JACKET. Nicely dodged though Tim
The category was only for the surname.
It's true I'm a girl in Canada and I've never spoken in my life
Apologies if this has been asked before, but is T.A. Taskmaster's Assistant? I'm genuinely worried for Horne if that becomes something that sits over him. Over.
Big if.
Come now Key, hands off your Spock and put on some Soc... rates? 5 squid an hour maybe?
Dogs Do.
Watto starting to show a crack, and his gameplay isn't as good either!
You mean crack*
Love the idea of insulting a comedian by saying they're funny. Hehe, good one Key!
peter pan(ts)
Can someone help me understand the “no repeated letters” category? Almost everyone they said after had a repeated letter? What am I missing?
the category is 'no more people who have no repeated letters in their name' which meant everyone they then named had to have a repeated letter
It couldn't be more people like Aesop, with *no* repeated letters.
Are the crispy rice lads getting post to Mr. Snap, Mr. Crackle and Mr. Pop?
Key could’ve fought and stayed on that not being a surname.
too low!
I just watched a video of a special needs cat wearing a helmet, and then I come straight to Tim wearing that and looking very similar...
Mark in a crop top is way too sexy
8:29 Challenge, Merkin.
Category Spoilers
20:24 Mark’s chest hair is shaped like a heart
Charlie Dimmock/Tommy Walsh no more found muddy
Eddie the Eagle no more performed “main” activity in Canada
Socrates/Leon Trotsky no more items of clothing starting with the first three letters of surname
Mert Aksac/Benedict Wong no more actors
Aesop no more names without repeated letters
Grotbags no more evil
Gareth Keenan no more characters portrayed by human
Edward Elgar no more shown playing piano
Willo the Wisp no more “funny” voices
Crackle no more one mononymous people ~ item of clothing from first three letters … Key out
Samuel Taylor Coleridge no more born in England ~ item of clothing from first three letters … Watto out
Horne wins Set 5 Game 12
So nobody who has a silent role is 'portraying' a character. Worst since Hogan.
Nah I'm with key. If they didn't have the big heads on then I'd walk but that's a costume, not a person being the character
@@britishhedgehog So the people in costumes in some Disney musical aren't portraying characters ? Even if you go to something like Disney land the Big Head people pretend to be the characters for kids. (I don't mind Big Heads)
@@bearhustler I think Key's point that the big head Disney characters in your example would count, due to the 'musical'.
Whereas, these crackley lads weren't being portrayed in any piece of fictional artwork (stage, TV, film, commercial, opera, etc). Hence it was nothing more than a dress-up and jolly. For instance, if I stuck play-doh all over my body for Halloween, surely that shouldn't count as Morph being portrayed by a human.
@@bearhustler they're not portraying human characters. The big head outfits aren't human. They're either a) over sized so not human or b) snap, crackle and pop are pixies anyway not humans
@@britishhedgehog gnomes, but fair point!
Could live without the songs.
Begone, you pooper of parties!
frankly I don’t think I could
Could live without the songs
I could live without the songs
Poke a finger in my eye
Could live without the songs
Could live without the songs
I could live without the songs
Kiss me quick and say goodbye
Could live without the songs
Keenan, 2 Es & 2Ns. Crackle, 2 Cs. Coleridge, 2 Es 😆
The category was no more with NO repeated letters.
@@hughie501 Oh right. How did Elgar get through then?
@@ootoobeah71 Edward Elgar - over the whole name
@@ootoobeah71 It was challenged but the category was through the full name.
No more people with NO repeated letters, though.