I am a 65 years old chinese born in Hong Kong and have been reading the comments here down below. I can understand the resentment of some of these older folks who had actually even practiced wingchun but did not appreciate how helpful the skills will bring in an actual fight. I have done some wingchun myself but had not completed it when I was younger 35 years ago or so, because I found it not powerful enough at a time in its punching when dealing with bigger and taller western guy especially when they have thicker clothing on in the street during winter. Also, the way in wingchun's training is honestly really lack of full physical body contact and powerful full body sparing and various physical encounters. I finally switched to do Muay Thai and I am still training it (Muay Thai) with kicks, knees, elbows and punching for my physical fitness at the age of 65 every week just in case of a real street fight where you really need a good physical condition to protect yourself in the Western world. Not only Muay Thai have I trained, I have also trained in BJJ during my 50's. With Muay Thai and BJJ, I both have a private instructor where I can learn the use of its techniques more efficiently especially in a well monitored sparing condition without hurting yourself with a much experienced instructor. With all these different training, I begin to understand not only the fighting skills that you need, but also what it takes physically to take on a real fight. Moreover, I have also trained in Philippino arni silat with stick fight and a little bit of knife fighting. With better knowledge of different fighting skills will definitely give you a better chance of protecting yourself in a real fight. But please do not say wing chun is not useful as a fighting technique in itself, it definitely gives me a very good understanding what to do in a fight especially the automatic response or reflection that I've got from the practice of chisau, yes wing chun itself has its own drawback. But the reflection training from chisau earned me a good reflect and land a punch on a western white guy as he touched my arm. Again, I disagree with some comments here saying that the Sifu here is only talked and his explanation is only good on paper. I think people have to understand learning a particular chinese fighting art does not necessarily make you a strong candidate in street fighing or fight in the ring as the practitioner is not trained for such a purpose. But the skills are there when it comes to the right situation where to apply. Finally, I really enjoy and appreciate the skill of the sifu here who can understand so many different form of chinese martial arts. I feel sorry that I am to far away and too old to add on more chinese arsenal. Otherwise, I think this sifu is really skillfull. Very much appreciated his explanations. Only fool don't understand the importance of equiping yourself with more skills and arsenal will stand a better chance in a real fight bear hand no gloves. And remember fighting in a ring takes a different form of training including relentless phyical training to stand 5 rounds of 3 mins round MuayThai fight, 12 rounds of 3 mins round boxing fight, but of course 5 mins round Bjj.
Excelente técnica mi estimado amigo eres un súper maestro de los mejores a mi me encanta el kun fu yo siempre lo práctico y lo estoy grabando mi futuro maestro
李師傅真係一個好好既老師，能夠精通各大門派透徹理解不同門派套拳設計理念同應用，坊間並不多這類師傅
I am a 65 years old chinese born in Hong Kong and have been reading the comments here down below. I can understand the resentment of some of these older folks who had actually even practiced wingchun but did not appreciate how helpful the skills will bring in an actual fight.
I have done some wingchun myself but had not completed it when I was younger 35 years ago or so, because I found it not powerful enough at a time in its punching when dealing with bigger and taller western guy especially when they have thicker clothing on in the street during winter. Also, the way in wingchun's training is honestly really lack of full physical body contact and powerful full body sparing and various physical encounters. I finally switched to do Muay Thai and I am still training it (Muay Thai) with kicks, knees, elbows and punching for my physical fitness at the age of 65 every week just in case of a real street fight where you really need a good physical condition to protect yourself in the Western world. Not only Muay Thai have I trained, I have also trained in BJJ during my 50's. With Muay Thai and BJJ, I both have a private instructor where I can learn the use of its techniques more efficiently especially in a well monitored sparing condition without hurting yourself with a much experienced instructor. With all these different training, I begin to understand not only the fighting skills that you need, but also what it takes physically to take on a real fight. Moreover, I have also trained in Philippino arni silat with stick fight and a little bit of knife fighting. With better knowledge of different fighting skills will definitely give you a better chance of protecting yourself in a real fight. But please do not say wing chun is not useful as a fighting technique in itself, it definitely gives me a very good understanding what to do in a fight especially the automatic response or reflection that I've got from the practice of chisau, yes wing chun itself has its own drawback. But the reflection training from chisau earned me a good reflect and land a punch on a western white guy as he touched my arm.
Again, I disagree with some comments here saying that the Sifu here is only talked and his explanation is only good on paper. I think people have to understand learning a particular chinese fighting art does not necessarily make you a strong candidate in street fighing or fight in the ring as the practitioner is not trained for such a purpose. But the skills are there when it comes to the right situation where to apply.
Finally, I really enjoy and appreciate the skill of the sifu here who can understand so many different form of chinese martial arts. I feel sorry that I am to far away and too old to add on more chinese arsenal. Otherwise, I think this sifu is really skillfull.
Very much appreciated his explanations. Only fool don't understand the importance of equiping yourself with more skills and arsenal will stand a better chance in a real fight bear hand no gloves.
And remember fighting in a ring takes a different form of training including relentless phyical training to stand 5 rounds of 3 mins round MuayThai fight, 12 rounds of 3 mins round boxing fight, but of course 5 mins round Bjj.
謝謝師父指點！三展拳真的是學到老, 用到老! 😉
謝謝李老師及師兄的講解示範！
精彩演繹，多謝李師傅無私教學❤❤❤
We were waiting anxiously for your lesson Master!
唉！咬文嚼字，紙上談兵，鑽牛角尖，中國武術便是被這班所謂師傅搞死，怪不得李小龍生前極看不起大部分武術師傅，不要說檑台搏擊經驗，跟本成世人連‘交’也未打過，絕對打不過爛仔甚至一個普通人. 相信對著泰拳、散打、西洋拳，MMA拳手，絕對捱不到五秒鐘便瞓低.
1950年，兩個所謂武術大師，太極吳公儀及白鶴陳克夫在澳門比武（網上有得睇）當時五歲的我，也不明為何像小孩子打架，此後有一段時期學習國術的人大減.
年少時，六一年左右，曾跟黃淳樑學習詠春，認識不少早年詠春門人，（應全部已過身）大部分習詠春的人都無搏擊經驗，得把口，甚至葉問，我所知也無和人打過，祇有黃淳樑、張卓興，李小龍及彭錦発（曾跟小龍習武）少數人， 是常常打架，有實際搏擊經驗. 曾睇過彭錦發對蔡李佛江中鶴在土瓜灣的政府合處（近天光道）講手， 結果彭取勝，打爆江中鶴眼眉骨，彭搏鬥經驗丰富，拳快、準及重，跟本和詠春無関，什麼攤手,膀手完全無用，祇有曰字沖拳，運用得當最實際，才開始覺悟那些武術招式大多無用，觀察所有武術，全部是攻擊作為防守，不論散打，西洋拳，泰拳皆如是.
絕對同意！自從看到1954年比武視頻後對那些所謂中國功夫已經徹底失望。
非貶意, 要用藝術角度看待中華武術. 把國術的一招一式對拆視為象棋攻守便好了. 換個角度, 你就會懂得欣賞. 想實戰, 去學別的吧.
@@aman1860-e1f 吓！中華武術是用來保家衛國實戰搏鬥㗎！用藝術角度看待？搞錯？
@@wingfaiwong346 六七十年代香港去泰國比武嘅選手幾乎全軍覆沒！搏鬥期間有那一招那一式看到所謂中華武術？看到的只是有些西方拳擊模樣？更加多的是街頭普通人毆鬥樣子！
基本理論係要學，但實戰都唔可以古板，人係生嘅😂自己發揮唔好唔可以怪人
Excelente técnica mi estimado amigo eres un súper maestro de los mejores a mi me encanta el kun fu yo siempre lo práctico y lo estoy grabando mi futuro maestro
師父好嘢！！！！
勁
慢动作讲得头头是道，但实际的打斗过程中都基本上变成了王八拳
文講武 好睇 好聽 好爽 真打起來 拳出係快如閃電 內氣也隨掌拳腿齊噴發出勢不可擋 瓜唔到對方手
又快又講得，莫非國師馬保國的閃人狗連鞭，仲有柒輸苦。
所以要不斷轉身，拉開距離，不停用真 ，勾，擺等拳不停攻擊。等對方無法用橋手，格打。
詠春拳套拳思維，同其他門派不同，有d 水只有散手。好多招式都係三下，不要將簡單複習化，有一個講法，詠春係有式(post)無招（moves),實際博擊手法千變萬化，未必如你所想。另外你嘅'間手'，我哋叫'擸手'，你擸得太低，回手會較慢。
几时开一集怎样破拳击方法，因为拳击直拳勾拳系好大力的，怎样破解？
不會開，因為無解😂😂😂
長拳對詠春才好看嘛
Li Sifu,very interesting how do they say in cantonese "old monk brushes his sleeve"?
能否介紹一下地躺，狗拳等的地戰功夫？
真係打起上嚟咪又係38拳
他的黐手功夫也很好。
是個【江湖百曉生】。
唔係因為李小龍勁先帶動到詠春，武術只係恆常訓練到反應、氣力、速度之根本。
纸上谈兵，功夫意淫😂
八斬刀嘅用法😊
老師肝木克脾土，要調理好脾胃。
LIKED
Taolu arrow palm has this technique.
花拳繡腿😂實戰比人打死，夾埋套路表演
我師父是天山派吹水拳天下無敵🤣
師傅說出直拳時手肘不要撬起什麼什麼？西方打出勾拳時手肘扛起不知多高？還不是打得有板有眼？
實際搏擊，什麼武術招式都難用得上，最實用就係王八拳、大擺拳！😊
洪拳同詠春真係好針對人體工學，呢啲技巧都係非常之實用，無學過嘅人成日覺得拳法工夫得個講字，但真係打起交上嚟有學過嘅人同無學過嘅人優勢差距係非常之大😂唔識嘢嘅人真係唔好亂話無用😂
支拿功夫次次同人打都輸到仆街又點解釋?
詠春講就天下無敵打就有心無
如果应用同套路咁唔一样、点解我哋练套路而唔系练应用呢？
有可能係防止別人偷學
其實這影片是強調套路練法和用法是一致，只是很多傳習者的問題，以為是無關係。
👏👏👏👏👏👏
世界前拳王泰臣講過，遇過好多所謂(各式武術) 高手，在搏擊前， 巳想好用多招式防守及攻擊，但當西洋拳，重搥及快打追擊下，根本毫無用處，只有被打！不過我都係相信李小龍先生的話，各派武術練得不好，缺乏速度及重力，个个都只有捱打！我練習多樣武術，一般熱身運動都只是約20分鐘，但西洋拳就更多及多種體能熱身！
其實詠春既魅力同智慧真係好好，好靚，不過我真心未見過一位師傅上到台係勝出，就算唔帶拳套都未
因為上台唔可以打要害
詠春好多係殺招。招招打要害
不是打比賽用的
比較是用來作殺人的技巧
@ 講呀？ 我自己學左6年，江志強條水既，我右了解唔到點打要害喎？
江師傅係好打得，不過真係打既時候我唔知有幾多係詠春既野.
假設呀！真係可以打要害啦，有冇一條片證明要詠春既實戰性？我個未搵到，有一位德國既詠春師傅黃淳梁條水既，佢既手快到閃光咁，佢係唯一一個我認為係係實戰上打得既人，不過我都未睇過佢打比賽or實戰
@
……
已經說明了這功夫不是（展示/表演）用的
……
@
詠春講求…. 快
你可以練到多快？
身為師父怎會教你…怎樣殺人😅😅😅😅😅
最多教你怎樣（防身）吧
…
殺招
好快插眼 插喉/插雞心等技術呀…
但師父不會說的吧
通常銜接下去的（下一招）就是
…幹掉對手的了
或銜接下去第二下…..
應該都不超過三下
而且那三下在極短時間內….
😅😅😅😅😅
但真的有必要 （學這些）嗎？
你學功夫係為了（殺人）而不是（防身）的？
我爸以前是跟（梁挺）的
他示範過很多（銜接）後可以怎樣打
我是可以領會當中很多招就是直接打要害
…
但當然任何功夫也需要一定體魄和速度
和基本功
使不出勁什麼功夫也沒有用
@
要搵條片（證明）詠春係用泥殺人既？
唔係卦
大佬
學功夫唔係甘既目的喎 😅😅😅😅😅
读少点书，可能都听不明白。武术，原来要用这么多瑙。不只是用体力而已
一看你就是沒文化, 中國功夫幾千年來證明是垃圾, 現在2024年, 已經沒有秘密, 到現在都不知道就是蠢得不得了.
李小龍五十年代就糸用詠春同朱家螳螂比武比人三幾妙KO左
👍👍👍👏👏👏
師父你去溪澗耍你啲溪澗手啦.上到台就真係比人KO得輕鬆嘞.
有姿勢冇實際😂😂😂
❤講得好，👍！但是，要剪掉頭髮前陰，否則遮眼被對手打倒下陰😂
有理論,有實際.佩服
支拿功夫次次同人打都輸到仆街又點解釋?
嗱~你咁樣呢我就咁樣~~紙上談兵.
你看清楚才說吧
他打的那些位置 他真的打下去 招招也是打要害…
會死人的
詠春常講…點到即止
….
為什麼你知道嗎
….
因為真下手是會有機會出人命的
😅😅😅😅😅
這種示範沒用的，所有是紙上談兵，去MMA或UFCshow比我地看實戰情況。許多所謂師傅他們一上實戰就挨打，因為他們太受傳統功夫的限制。功夫是一種指導或一種方法。人是活的。
古代有武器冷兵器詠春防中好重要❗️，詠x有加左入去美國海豹部隊，拿槍果啲合組左入去。 要快手，槍無時間同你玩遊戲😅。
@@nxpig1774 ???
果啲話學過詠春又話詠春唔得既人，問下自己有無練好基本功?
自己出拳無力打人唔痛，俾你練乜都無用啦😂😂
這種武術 只適易講 實際如果對手不合作 這樣就😂
不是這樣的
詠春更講求（手感）和（速度）
跟（對方的距離感）也非常重要
那你會怎麼破
好差的手及好差的解手 , 全部都係知少少
思路分析
拳腳配套
探古尋源
印證活用
守正護門
開合有道
靱勁起落
紋路揣摩
武術核心
“练拳三战起，三战练到死”，这句话倒是在福建鹤拳里听过，但说的是“三战”套路。
支拿功夫次次同人打都輸到仆街又點解釋?
正狗西
有啲悶
講多過做，
你同李師傅示範，小心不要打親師傅，否則.
練拳先練俾人打 忍得痛 頂得住 在真實是你打人十拳 人家還你一拳 就己經瞓係地上 像MMA 咁打法 兩三秒己經被人KO
MMA 是擂台上的拳
詠春是可以用來殺人的
很多招式也是打要害
不同性質
詠春不是用來（表演）用的
因為真正打時（出招超快）
所以不太好看
只打架式不打出勁力又不打要害是真的沒有用
@forever2005 睇下示範 一個人企定任打 真實世界會是這樣的嗎？所以網上甚麼詠春 太極 一上台就俾人幾拳打到仆街 捱唔到一兩拳以經暈倒 笑卵死人啦
@
不是的
看就知你根本就沒有玩過詠春
很多招也是直接下殺手的
真正的詠春（不是像電視還可以看見架勢的）…
上馬速度超快 有時在對手防守意識就已經打中對手了。是真的快…
一般人（拉弓）出拳不到一半
真識打詠春那個已經埋到果個人身了
我唔叻
但以前學習時一個人打兩個普通的正常人（大人）基本就沒有問題
@
你真的完全不懂…🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹
不是（企定任打）的
是你一旦（去到詠春的攻防）範圍
打詠春的那個人（才會出手）的
雖然也有時會上馬主動進攻
但通常敵不動 我不動
勁既人（痴手）係唔打開眼練的
就係練到一接觸到對手就會產生自然反應防守或攻擊
但因為詠春多著重防守
所以比人感覺非常柔弱
但你真係知咩係詠春就知道這功夫遠超你正常人可以想像的
因為速度非常快
所以不是像（網絡）般打架式的
架式只是使外行人看清楚（拳路）和（使用方法）
即是
彈琴那人也放慢速度你才能看清楚他怎樣彈吧
道理都是一樣的
@
那只是博流量的方式
🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹
真打是（不同）的
且通常直接見紅
我見過有人用詠春在街頭直接打到血流滿面
或…瞓喺地下……
但我們不是要偍倡暴力
不想鼓吹武力..
說明詠春係好好打
我們真的不希望這樣
再多說一次
詠春不是表演用的
是防身用的
但真的有很多（殺人技）
招招攻要害。全部一兩招就出人命…
🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹