I love how Atty. Sta Maria delivered her argument. It's so relatable and easy to understand esp this statement "We do not put fire exits in buildings in hopes that the building will burn down". 👏
@@kalawagisulan no. Argument on logic. An analogy. Argument of pro-divorce as pure self-happiness. Why marry on the first place if the back up plan was exiting. 🤣
coming from a dysfunctional family, I can truly say how impenetrable that facade is. We looked like a normal family on the outside, my parents served at the church on Sundays but the people around didn't know the terror wrought upon us by that person. Even my mother's family didn't know until her sister had been unfortunate enough to have been caught on the end of his rage.
Pakasal pa ng hindi nag iisip tas sino sisihin nyo gobyerno? Mabuti yan magdusa kayo alam nyo kubg ano ka banal ang kasal pinagisipan nyo dapat yan ng maayos at hindi ng padalos dalos.
@@johnvista2858 d Po aq kasal pina sign lng aq s papel n prang birth certificate at pinracis n x.never Po aq nkaranas Ng kasal kit San sulok Ng mundo.s pag durusa labis labis n kya dpt lng n layasan ang mga taong toxic,hindi healthy relationship.dq po deserve un pra s tabi nya mamatay...ung mga taong sarado ang utak at hunghang d nyo kailangan manahimik nlng.d k u nakakatulong.s taong ned ang divorce pra mamuhay Ng my peace of mind.
Inviolable does pertain to the family institution itself where the government needs to protect, but it does not necessarily means that having a divorce law would diminish, tarnish or disrespect the institution because we have the Bill Of Rights which means every individual has equal rights to resolutions and remedies of the law applicable to a safe, peaceful and ideal environment.
I’m for Atty. Calleja’s arguments, very logical. The constitutional interpretation and even the rules of statutory construction were clearly cited. 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Pass the divorce law. My parents were better when they decided to separate. Definitely, it wasn't easy for us kids but they made sure that their kids were taken care of. They have accepted their fate that they will never gonna end up together. I can't imagine the life we have now if they were still living together and forcing things would work out. I'm happy where they are now, compared to the life I had when they were together.
There is nothing in the plain text of the 1987 Constitution that prohibits divorce. So to say that divorce is unconstitutional is to add something that is not written into the fundamental law. Atty. Sta Maria's argument is very logical, legally crisp so to speak. We cannot even invoke Biblical passages to prohibit divorce because that is tantamount to imposing something to those who have different spiritual orientation or no orientation at all . The constitution is for all, believers and non believers.
Exactly, it's even in our Bill of Rights...equal protection. Why these people who are against Divorce are depriving other peoples' right to protect themselves and preference to divorce and fix their miselrable lives. If bible is the basis then let it be a basis for people who believe or prefers to follow it. On the other hand, the constitution is for everyone, regardless of religious belief.
In my opinion, if the Philippines have a divorce law in the future it might be apply for broken marriages and the condition requiremements are in the highest level of justification. There are marriages that the spouses killing one another, we can't force them to live together.
But no one is forcing. 🤷 We have laws against violence. If we sit longer on the topic, we will all realize we have laws that address different form and expression of abuse, married or not.
Passing the Divorce Bill will not contradict the constitution, because as Sta. Maria said, the instruction is to PROTECT. It will not violate marriages because that's not the state's job. Marriage is between the 2 people involved, the state merely declares them to be a valid couple. The things that destroy or violate marriages are between those people. Hence, divorce can merely be a safeguard for those affected by destroyed marriages, not for those that are thriving. I was married, legally still am, but I've been separated for 8yrs now with a pervert of a husband who had caused me so much mental and emotional anguish. Staying stuck in an absent marriage when I want to be free to love someone else and be happy with someone else forces me to violate laws if I were to end up with someone else. Staying stuck in a loveless marriage creates more anguish and anxiety, more mental, emotional, if not physical and financial distress.. The govt must remember that it is ALSO the State's job to protect not just the marriage, but also the people, the individuals involved in those marriages. That was what Calleja did not address. The Divorce Bill needs to be passed as it is a means to protect the individuals from destroyed marriages. And those saying "you shouldn't have gotten married in the first place" or "why did you get married if you wanted to divorce," first off, odds are you're either single or still bitter from a failed relationship. You obviously don't get into something seeing the full picture. You obviously dont get into something knowing everything about it. It's all part of one's experience. It's a journey, and marriage is a journey. So why don't you try getting married. Give us an update after 7-10yrs. If it works great for you, awesome. If not, let us know how you feel.
@@cegiehd why marry tho if ur back up plan was to escape. Why not stay celibate? 🤣 C'mon u are even part of that what you so called "failed relationship" the irony.
"Constitutionality precedes necessity." What a powerful statement! Kudos to Atty. Calleja for his very strong and logical arguments against divorce. Without appealing to the emotion nor getting support from religion, he was able to highlight the unconstitutionality of divorce.
❤❤❤"the family is the basic unit of the society" meaning if the family is broken, what kind of society will there be. therefore instead of having a divorce law the government should create/make programs that would strenghten/protect marriages. 🙏🙏🙏
Is it possible to have broken families without divorce? Do broken families exist even without divorce? If yes, then what are you arguing about. Is the only thing keeping families from “breaking” is that there is no divorce?
@@DailyBugle66 yesss maam/sir. could you not imagine how a wife would feel knowing her husband has an affair with another woman/women? is it not possible that this wife would go insane after a lot of heartbreak. it would probably be not too bad if the husband would continue to give financial support and what about the feelings of the children, looking at their mother's condition, worse if financially he fails to support the family. what kind of children will there be in the community. could you not antipate/forsee the quantity of chilren/young/adult who could become additional problem to the community. worst if the husband could not be linked to only one woman but to more women and bore more children. 🙏🙏🙏philippines is not a rich country so how could divorce be possible. do please please please reflect on it🙏🙏🙏
@@priscacanares-bp8iy you make no sense, so no to divorce because then there is no support? So maybe the solution is in the divorce itself, where assets are settled and financial support is determined? That is how it is done in other countries too right?
@@DailyBugle66 yesss of course to rich countries but to poor countries where most of the people are jobless, could hardly even feed their own mouths, ,what properties/assets could be settled? and what financial support could be determined? hellllloooooowwww!!!!!!!!!!!! let us please be realistic🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
According to Forbes Advisor, 43% of first marriages in the United States end in divorce, with even higher rates for second (60%) and third (73%) marriages. Now, close to 75% of juvenile delinquents come from these broken families. Just imagine the social costs of that divorce may impose.
My question is, is it because of the divorce or the fact and the reasons why they get the divorce course, I mean if the family is under abuse then it is the abuse that cause why the child is delinquent not the divorce,
@@banquo80s99 divorce rates in the USA should be used as a case study as to why to avoid divorce law. Especially we are ONLY A THIRD WORLD COUNTRY. Also do you know Jeffrey Dahmer was a product of divorced family?
I'm for absolute divorce... this issue is long overdue...it has to put into rest..." don't impose your belief on other people, because it is unfair.."..
those people are just delusional,,it doesn't mean its ok for you, then ok for someone else,,if vatican and philippines the only country with no divorce and yet a country with bunch of corrupt but so religious,,then i dont know what;s with the mentality of anti divorce then,,if it is for the good of whole?
The key here is marriage is a sacrament. Proponents of the divorce law see this as just a way of ending a marriage and starting anew. Marriage is not for everyone hence before entering one, one should have a discernment of what one is getting into. God bless!
"Marriage is not for everyone hence before entering one, one should have a discernment of what one is getting into. hence before entering one, one should have a discernment of what one is getting into." --- Easier said than Done! 🙂. Lahat ng ikinasal SUMUMPA SILA NG "TILL DEATH TO US PART." Lahat yan maski-anong DISCERNMENT YAN - GOD's or PEOPLE way - they would say ready na sila at sila ay nag-mamahalan at walang makakasira and di sila maghihiwalay. Lahat yan pare. 🙂. Remember there is a pre-marriage counselling (required) both spiritual and professional bago ikasal ang groom and bride. And it would last 3 to 4 hours. There are successful marriages and there are failed marriages. That's the reality. "Marriage is not for everyone?" - O common tell that to the marines or kay Mang Maryo or kay Aling Iska. 🙂
If one will think of only of themselves and not your children's trauma when one get divorced, you will favor divorce... if the parents can't endure marriage, the children will learn not to endure anything. Marriage is a vow and sacred, dont get married if you dont know its hardships. "Ang pag aasawa ay hindi kanin isusubo na pag napaso ay iluluwa". Sa harapan ng room na walang fire exit may nakalagay... " wag pumasok kng ayaw mapaso"
di mapapag usapan ang mga ganitong bagay kung iaalay natin sa panginoon ang pagsasama ng mag asawa. kailangan ang panginoon ay kasama sa buhay mag asawa. sa bibliya nasusulat kung pano magsama ang mag asawa. 100% walang maghihiwalay... all Glory to God 🛐
divorce law should be allowed because there are marriages that don't work out. No spouses will separate unless they wish it. Spouses who have strong bond, whatever you do, you can't separate them no matter what. when spouses go for divorce, that means before they talked about it, they are already separated. it's the opposite of marriage contract. couple don't get together because of marriage contract.
As u saud it, 2 persons do not go to marriage as merely a contract - it is a commitment to love and a commitment to work for the family together. If they do not want that commitment, then do not marry.
@@beautifullycreatable not wanting to have commitment does not cause not to marry. the goal of divorce is not for the one who continuously love and honored what he/she committed, but for the other spouse who is lost n refuses to amend perpetually.
Unahin sana yung anti dynasty law as stated on the constitution before this dividing bill. Nothing more damaging to a nation than a corrupt political dynasties who feds on the lowly and innocent people.
At this point, I don't understand why we still don't have divorce here. Is it because of a law that was made by MEN in the time where 14-year old women were legally married? Is it because of religion, that people believe it is sanctimonious in the eyes of God? So, if I say I don't believe in God, shouldn't I be exempt from YOUR belief? If you don't believe marriage should be dissolved at any given time, then don't freaking divorce. Let the option to end a something be available to everyone if and when that something was not working anymore. Abuse, both physical and emotional, is a very real reason why we should have this. Heck, even happiness. If both parties don't see a future with each anymore, what is the point? Because PEOPLE outside of the relationship are against it? Apakabobo, nakakairita.
People failed to understand the sacred of marriage itself. One thing that ruin it because the reason of marriage itself.. unwanted pregnancy, premarital sex, etc. If the meaning of sacred is no longer there then marriage it’s just matter of paper, while we forget that marriage life is God’s plan for us. I disagree with her analogy about “Fire Plan”. Still, I can’t judge people who want to divorce.
7 years ago i got married with my foreign husband and after 1 year of being married he cheated me and keft me with my son who is new born.. Till now no communication and support from him😢
My pag asa p po b aq maging msaya?😢nkatali po aq s kapirasong papel n d nmn aq nkasal.gus2 q nmn po mkawala s situation n nagpahirap s akin nuon p gng s ngaun 😢😢help po msakit s akin n nagaantay s divorce bill sna free po pra s mga nangangailangan tulad q.ipagkaloob nyo po soon dahil matanda n po aq at hangad q po my peace of mind.😢😢😢😢
@@PewPewJet you are missing the point lol,, marriage it self is an option,, however when you entered it you should also have an option to be out of it because of abuse, cheating, and exploitation that you might suffer from it..
Absolute divorce para tapus na ang usapan Sus maryusip wala namang pang support ang ama anong gagawin aber?hayaang mag nganga kasama mga anak ganun ba yung mga againts sa divorced?kaya tama na para makahinga naman ang mga kababaihan na my pangarap para sa future ng mga anak nila
Kung my divorce obliged yung tatay mgsupport sa mga anak. Kaya irresponsible ang mga lalaking Pilipino mg anak sa kun sino sinong babae kasi hindi cla liable.
But Will Contradict the Law of God who is Sovereign Ruler of the Universe, it's not about the church but about a God supposedly ruling us all in Theocratic way
I believe in God and I pray. But you know my friend that is the IDEAL. Na put God in the center. But it does not happen always. Even marriage counselling may di umuubra dyan. There are certain percentages of "failed marriages" you cannot deny that. So would you blame them kasi they did not follow God's words or try their best to save their marriage? And mahabang discussion yan - "Contradict The Law of God".
Divorce in the Philippines is only for the rich who can afford the expenses involved in the process from getting the services of a lawyer to the filing and court hearings appurtenant to it, just like annulment. The lower and middle classes cannot afford it, which is why, in my opinion, it will not be an effective solution to marital problems.
"Chemotherapy is often accessible only to the rich, with the lower and middle classes often not being able to afford it. Therefore, it is not an effective treatment for cancer." If the problem here is accessibility then the focus should be on lowering barriers to those not in the upper classes, not just outright giving up on any hope of making this country a better place
Gusto ko yung sinira muna ni Attorney yung argument ni kuya Attorney na puro Constitution Constitution blah-blah-blah, not about the people at all. Tapos tinapos niya with very strong analogies.
Ayon kay Atty. Jaypee Calleja, ang Absolute Divorce Bill ay naglalayong magbigay ng mas mabilis at mas murang paraan para sa mga mag-asawa na wakasan ang kanilang kasal. Layunin nitong protektahan ang mga nasa mapang-abusong relasyon at magbigay ng legal na opsyon upang makalaya sa mga walang pag-asang sitwasyon. Ito ay isang malaking hakbang para sa karapatan ng mga kababaihan at kalalakihan na nasa ganitong sitwasyon
If we don't have a divorce law that even our poorest people can afford, don't get married. If you get married and your marriage fails, you are the ones to be blamed!
My annulment nga kaso nadi naman lahat mapag bigyan kahit makalbo kana jan sakaka file mu kung wala kang kapit waley din kaya real talk tayo senate wag puro plano la namang nagaganap
Ipasa nyo na lang ang divorce bill ...saka nyo na lang pagnilayan ang sinabi ni Hesus "kaya binigyan kayo ni Moses ng divorce paper dahil sa katigasan ng inyong ulo." Ipasa na, saka na lang kayo magnilay. Goodluck!
ano kaya pakialam ng ganitong katuwiran kung hindi sya apektado sa naghihirap na magaswa wala ng pagasa! kung sila maligaya sa sa kani kanilang asawa fine pero pano un hindi igagaya nila sa sarili nila???? ugad ang mga ganitong abuhado dahil gusto nila kutongan ang mga mahasawa hindi na maligaya sa pag sasama
Dahil marami sa atin ay nasa mababang level ng economy, lalaki lang ang problema kung may divorce. Magkano ang pa korte, yung suporta sa mga anak at iba pa na resposibilidad ng magasawa sa pamilya. Kung marirap ka, paano matutustusan ito? Kailangan ata explika sa mamayan kung ano ang pros & cons ng diborsyo at mag pa plebisito ang estado, di lang ang iilan sa kongreso.
Bakit sobra ang pagtutol natin sa divorce law! Kung maganda ang takbo ng relationship ng isang pamily, hindi kailangan ito! Bakit hindi natin tignan yung mga pamilya magulo na, na nagsasama lang dahil sa kasal! Meron annulment pero very costly ang proseso! Ang Canada! Nasa nagkaroon sila ng pinaka mababang 5.6% divorce rate sa 1k marriage! Ibig sabihin! Ang divorce ay nagagamit lang na ultimo remedyo sa paghihiwalay! At bago dadaan sa divorce proceedings, may mga proseso pang dadaanan para masalba ang marriage! Let's us interpret the laws liberally, to suit the current needs/situation!
puro kayu tutol magulo na ngae db di nyu kasi nararanasan kaya gnyn nlang ung pagtotul nyu wlang kwenta batas tlga dito sa pinas sege antayin nyu patayin ung mga babae ng mga kinakasma nila dhil Subra na ung gulo
true, they just so religously believe everything is right and its against GOD's will.But there are no separation of Power of the church and state, It should be a collaborative effort for the good of majority not the chosen few.
The highest law on the land is the will of the people. People created the Constitution and people voted for the current constitution. It is not the other way around.
The highest law on the land is 10 Commandments and Law of God..What God has United in Marriage, let no man divide..that includes you .divorce is Satan's agenda to destroy family and destroy marriage..divorce is not the answer..the family that prays together stay together
@@MarkPaul-y2d times like these remind me of the importance of the separation of the church and state. Ethically, the golden rule can be the guiding principle as every religion has a version of it.
yes it is true that the people created the constitution. But bear in mind that, if what you said, that the "will of the people should be paramount" over a law. Then we will going to have an anarchy where every one can do what he wills. It is the main reason why we created the government and our constitution and laws. For instance one person wants or will to get someone's property, without the government/constitution or laws. What do you think will happen?? Government is created so that excesses of our free will could be contained. Laws are passed so that we have proper ways on how to achieve things or work without doing/resorting to violence. If we only allow what the "people will" then we are all fuck_d up thats for sure. Bcoz not every one will agree on all things. It is the law that kept us from doing that, from going into the direction of anarchy. Therefore it should be the constitution that should always be followed. And not just what idea/propaganda is being popular today. The state should protect its constituents from what is called "impulsive behaviors" or those demagogues who are riding on popular issues like this one. The state should always prioritize what is best for the constituents not just today but for the generations to come. If they want to have a divorce they first have to change the constitutional provision regarding divorce or else it will be constitutional.
may batas naman na poprotekta sa mga naaabuso mentally or physically dba? if divorce ay maging batas, baka naman maging abusive ung tao? since may divorce naman, they will tend to hurt their spouses, then do it again again and again. ??
sana may study kung mas maganda bang myembro ng society ang mga anak na lumaki kasama ang magulang kumpara sa hiwalay na magulang. dun ako sa positive sa kids. sa mag-asawa, wala akong pake at matatanda na mga yan. dun ako sa mga bata.
Ang pinapag sama ng Diyos ay hindi dapat papag hiwalayin ng tao. Nasa bible yan at 90% ng filipino ay Christians. Hindi tayo dapat tumulad sa mga liberated countries
Basta isa lang masbai ko, hindi ang tao gumawa ng kasal. Kaya wag nyong salaulaiin ang kasal. Kung kayo inaabuso hiwalayan nyo. Pero wag ma kayong magpakasal kasi di naman kayo sure kung hanggang sa kamatay kayo magsasama ng partner nyo. Married is sacred, kaya kung sakali man na magpapakasal kayo yong naghihingalo na kayo magpakasal para tiyak nyo na di na kayo ulit mag divorce. Dahil sabi sa sinumpaan ng ikinakasal ay till death do us part. Paano ang sinumpaan kung mag divorce pala kayo. Kaya dapat wag na kayo magpakasal kung mag divorce lang naman kayo.
You have to ask the person's involved not those who.do not experienced irreversible couple relationship..peace of mind to both parties should be considered.family should live harmonious not chaos..broken family for such long time will never be the same again it needs to be settled accdg to their conscience..Phil's need divorce law
Sabi nga ni Fr Ripperger, all socities will go down that road. Ang tanong is hanggang kailan naten ipaglalaban at poprotektahan ang ating pinangangalagang magagandang asal at prinsipyo.
This law is favour only sa mga walang Love sa puso at sa mga walang kasiyahan sa buhay. Therefore, this must be issued with highly paid in amount. Whether it's conflict or not in a previous law, mostly in the Laws of God.
Hopefully, Filipinos will be awaken from a long sleep.... For those single people, DO NOT ENGAGE in marriage.. because there is not exit door provided by the law... Mag-live in nlng kayu.
Ako nga catholic pero hindi na ko naniniwala sa kanila.😂 sino bang Diyos ang may gustong magkapatayan ang mag asawa? Tapos pinayagan ang annulment pero divorce hindi? 😂 nakakatawa. Dahil ng sa kapirasong papel, swerte naman ng mag bebenefits na kahit matagal na kayong hiwalay sya pa din makakakuha😅 ayusin nyo batas nyo wag puro pera. May annulment nga sobrang tagal mahal na sobrang tagal pang maipasa. Halatang pinagkakaperahan lang 😂 #YesToDivorce
Constitution? Sino ba mga nasunod dito? Nasunod ba mga kagustuhan ng taong bayan? Hindi! Sabi noon sa news, "the Philippine constitution is made by the rich for the rich"! Never for the people!
So when the divorce bill is passed what will happen to child support. Since many will move on and start new families and many children will not recieve support because the salary is bot enough. I guess we need a law like many western countries that if you dont pay your child support you go to jail.
E kung nag tagalog ka jan edi sana mas maintindihan yang pinaglalaban jan!hahahayy hirap na po ba magtagalog ang lahat? SO ETONG topic na to for the rich people lang talaga ang mga poor at di nakaka intindi ng english jan tabi tabi and pass nalang ang mga ferson
Being a Christian who believes in the goodness of jesus, I choose to stand by Him. Him, being good, much more hollier than any of us, including those who push for divorce; I will always trust in his goodness and wisdom. God has designed marriage to be sacred; hence, to be respected by all, primarily and especially married couples themselves. I firmly believe that God wants couples to love and respect their espouses and commit themselves to this till death, as they promised in marriage. It is sad and unfortunate that christians who are pro divorce don't seem to realize that divorce is not just a separation between a husband and a wife; it is actually a separation from the Lord. Christians who accept divorce are rejecting Jesus, who himself teaches: "Whatever that God has joined together, let no man separate" How could you claim to be a Christian, and yet rejecting Christ's teachings? Isn't that ironic and hypocritical?
wala akong pake problema ninyong mga kristiyano lamang yan the Philippines is not a theocracy. so pwede ba, huwag niyong idamay ang buong bansa sa kagaguhan ng kristiyano lamang
@@yuridelossantos569and that sometimes doesnt apply to this situation. If you want to live in a cave go ahead. Dont enforce your beliefs to the entire population.
@@butchfajardo8832 di ba responsibilidad mo na kilalanin mo muna magiging partner mo bago mo asawahin? If later nya pinakita kung anong totoong ugali nya kasalanan mo na yun. Papalakihin mo sa broken family mga anak mo. Just for selfish reason and lack of diligence to know the partner thoroughly
@@PewPewJet, tanungin mo mga binubog na misis. Hindi mo malalaman kapag mag jowa pa kayo na nang bubugbog siya! Lalabas lang yun kapag kasal na kayo! Yes, it's your job na kumilatis pero hindi mo malalaman kung sadya kang niloloko! Sa huli mo nalang malalaman! Kapag kasal ka na!
@@PewPewJet, malinaw na wala ka pang alam sa pag pili ng asawa. Tip ko sa iyo, mag pakilatis ka sa mga old folks! Baka magulat ka na wala ka pang alam sa pag ibig at pag pili ng asawa!
@@butchfajardo8832 then its the problem of the deceived. Kaya nga may kasabihan, walang maloloko kung hindi magpagpapaloko. Responsilidad naten hukayin lahat ng baho ng mapapangasawa.
Bawal din naman makiapid o saktan ang mga asawa sabi ng Bible ah. Dami nga dyan mga pari mismo na makasalanan din. Hindi lang dahil sa religion para hindi ipatupad yan. 😂 wala ka na ba mabigat na dahilan dahil lang ba sa christian ka? 😂
Sige, no divorce for you kahit na pwedeng one day patayin ka na ng asawa mo sa harapan ng mga anak mo. Alam mo ba ang magiging epekto non sa mental health ng mga anak mo? And in the long run, sa iyo din?
![[#2024MAMA] G-DRAGON - 무제(Untitled, 2014)+POWER+HOME SWEET HOME+뱅뱅뱅+FANTASTIC BABY | Mnet 241123 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Ox29z5Nf1Uk/mqdefault.jpg)
I love how Atty. Sta Maria delivered her argument. It's so relatable and easy to understand esp this statement "We do not put fire exits in buildings in hopes that the building will burn down". 👏
argument on emotion.
@@kalawagisulan no. Argument on logic. An analogy. Argument of pro-divorce as pure self-happiness. Why marry on the first place if the back up plan was exiting. 🤣
@@PewPewJetwhy exitlng if there no fire ?
why require fire exits if you don't expect fire burning your house?
@@kalawagisulan??? You are so wrong
coming from a dysfunctional family, I can truly say how impenetrable that facade is. We looked like a normal family on the outside, my parents served at the church on Sundays but the people around didn't know the terror wrought upon us by that person. Even my mother's family didn't know until her sister had been unfortunate enough to have been caught on the end of his rage.
Yes to divorce bill plz.😢 Ang tagal q ng hiwalay.nkatali prin gang s ngaun.tama n ang phirap 😢bigyan nyo po aq mkawala s trauma 😢😢😢😢
Bigyan kita ng gunting
Me too mas masarap maging single ulit forever tutal matanda na tayo kasi nakaka trauma.kung gusto nila mag asawa ulit it's their choice diba?😃
😢
Pakasal pa ng hindi nag iisip tas sino sisihin nyo gobyerno? Mabuti yan magdusa kayo alam nyo kubg ano ka banal ang kasal pinagisipan nyo dapat yan ng maayos at hindi ng padalos dalos.
@@johnvista2858 d Po aq kasal pina sign lng aq s papel n prang birth certificate at pinracis n x.never Po aq nkaranas Ng kasal kit San sulok Ng mundo.s pag durusa labis labis n kya dpt lng n layasan ang mga taong toxic,hindi healthy relationship.dq po deserve un pra s tabi nya mamatay...ung mga taong sarado ang utak at hunghang d nyo kailangan manahimik nlng.d k u nakakatulong.s taong ned ang divorce pra mamuhay Ng my peace of mind.
Very good arguments from Atty. Sta. Maria! Yes to divorce!
Inviolable does pertain to the family institution itself where the government needs to protect, but it does not necessarily means that having a divorce law would diminish, tarnish or disrespect the institution because we have the Bill Of Rights which means every individual has equal rights to resolutions and remedies of the law applicable to a safe, peaceful and ideal environment.
Simple pero tumatak ang lahat ng sinabi ni Atty Patty.❤
I’m for Atty. Calleja’s arguments, very logical. The constitutional interpretation and even the rules of statutory construction were clearly cited. 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
no, they're not
yung mag-asawa na nga mismo may ayaw, inviolable pa ba yun?
nagbabatuhan na nga, protected by the state pa ba yun?
@@neiltristanyabut Did you studied law? Who the hell cares about your opinion without a legal basis 🤮🤡
True@@neiltristanyabut
@@neiltristanyabut abugado ka?
how brilliant is Atty. Pat Santa Maria
I love the first exit analogy.
Pass the divorce law. My parents were better when they decided to separate. Definitely, it wasn't easy for us kids but they made sure that their kids were taken care of. They have accepted their fate that they will never gonna end up together. I can't imagine the life we have now if they were still living together and forcing things would work out. I'm happy where they are now, compared to the life I had when they were together.
There is nothing in the plain text of the 1987 Constitution that prohibits divorce. So to say that divorce is unconstitutional is to add something that is not written into the fundamental law. Atty. Sta Maria's argument is very logical, legally crisp so to speak. We cannot even invoke Biblical passages to prohibit divorce because that is tantamount to imposing something to those who have different spiritual orientation or no orientation at all . The constitution is for all, believers and non believers.
Exactly, it's even in our Bill of Rights...equal protection. Why these people who are against Divorce are depriving other peoples' right to protect themselves and preference to divorce and fix their miselrable lives. If bible is the basis then let it be a basis for people who believe or prefers to follow it. On the other hand, the constitution is for everyone, regardless of religious belief.
In my opinion, if the Philippines have a divorce law in the future it might be apply for broken marriages and the condition requiremements are in the highest level of justification. There are marriages that the spouses killing one another, we can't force them to live together.
But no one is forcing. 🤷 We have laws against violence. If we sit longer on the topic, we will all realize we have laws that address different form and expression of abuse, married or not.
😂no to divorce bill,God wag mong pahintulutang mapasa ito,Amen
@@YolandaSantos-k8f Edi dun ka sa GOD mo. Kung di para sa inyo ung divorce, THEN DONT GET ONE. wala ka naman nakitang "Mandatory" diba? Puro kayo GOD/
Passing the Divorce Bill will not contradict the constitution, because as Sta. Maria said, the instruction is to PROTECT. It will not violate marriages because that's not the state's job. Marriage is between the 2 people involved, the state merely declares them to be a valid couple. The things that destroy or violate marriages are between those people. Hence, divorce can merely be a safeguard for those affected by destroyed marriages, not for those that are thriving.
I was married, legally still am, but I've been separated for 8yrs now with a pervert of a husband who had caused me so much mental and emotional anguish. Staying stuck in an absent marriage when I want to be free to love someone else and be happy with someone else forces me to violate laws if I were to end up with someone else. Staying stuck in a loveless marriage creates more anguish and anxiety, more mental, emotional, if not physical and financial distress.. The govt must remember that it is ALSO the State's job to protect not just the marriage, but also the people, the individuals involved in those marriages. That was what Calleja did not address.
The Divorce Bill needs to be passed as it is a means to protect the individuals from destroyed marriages.
And those saying "you shouldn't have gotten married in the first place" or "why did you get married if you wanted to divorce," first off, odds are you're either single or still bitter from a failed relationship. You obviously don't get into something seeing the full picture. You obviously dont get into something knowing everything about it. It's all part of one's experience. It's a journey, and marriage is a journey. So why don't you try getting married. Give us an update after 7-10yrs. If it works great for you, awesome. If not, let us know how you feel.
@@cegiehd why marry tho if ur back up plan was to escape. Why not stay celibate? 🤣 C'mon u are even part of that what you so called "failed relationship" the irony.
Yes to Divorce 17yrs separated here from a very violent ex husband
Well said! Yes to Divorce!
@@PewPewJet whoever said anything about a back up plan? You don't get married to get separated. Clearly,, you didn't understand a word that was said.
@@arleneestal4661 I'm sorry you had to go through that, but glad you're out of it.
YES TO DIVORCE PLS!
Ang galing mo atty patty Sta Maria! Mabuhay ka!
"Constitutionality precedes necessity." What a powerful statement! Kudos to Atty. Calleja for his very strong and logical arguments against divorce. Without appealing to the emotion nor getting support from religion, he was able to highlight the unconstitutionality of divorce.
He’s not really arguing against divorce, he’s just stating the technicalities against it. There’s no substance, just techinicalities.
I agree
❤❤❤"the family is the basic unit of the society" meaning if the family is broken, what kind of society will there be. therefore instead of having a divorce law the government should create/make programs that would strenghten/protect marriages. 🙏🙏🙏
Exactly
Is it possible to have broken families without divorce? Do broken families exist even without divorce? If yes, then what are you arguing about. Is the only thing keeping families from “breaking” is that there is no divorce?
@@DailyBugle66 yesss maam/sir. could you not imagine how a wife would feel knowing her husband has an affair with another woman/women? is it not possible that this wife would go insane after a lot of heartbreak. it would probably be not too bad if the husband would continue to give financial support and what about the feelings of the children, looking at their mother's condition, worse if financially he fails to support the family. what kind of children will there be in the community. could you not antipate/forsee the quantity of chilren/young/adult who could become additional problem to the community. worst if the husband could not be linked to only one woman but to more women and bore more children. 🙏🙏🙏philippines is not a rich country so how could divorce be possible. do please please please reflect on it🙏🙏🙏
@@priscacanares-bp8iy you make no sense, so no to divorce because then there is no support? So maybe the solution is in the divorce itself, where assets are settled and financial support is determined? That is how it is done in other countries too right?
@@DailyBugle66 yesss of course to rich countries but to poor countries where most of the people are jobless, could hardly even feed their own mouths, ,what properties/assets could be settled? and what financial support could be determined? hellllloooooowwww!!!!!!!!!!!! let us please be realistic🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Divorce is long overdue. I am for the passage of Divorce law.
According to Forbes Advisor, 43% of first marriages in the United States end in divorce, with even higher rates for second (60%) and third (73%) marriages. Now, close to 75% of juvenile delinquents come from these broken families. Just imagine the social costs of that divorce may impose.
Salamat
My question is, is it because of the divorce or the fact and the reasons why they get the divorce course, I mean if the family is under abuse then it is the abuse that cause why the child is delinquent not the divorce,
True. Lets set USA as an example or case study of this divorce. Even Jeffrey Dahmer is a product of a divorced family.
This is a solid data to be used in the argument against divorce.
@@banquo80s99 divorce rates in the USA should be used as a case study as to why to avoid divorce law. Especially we are ONLY A THIRD WORLD COUNTRY. Also do you know Jeffrey Dahmer was a product of divorced family?
Kelangan talaga may ateneo humble brag intro
I'm for absolute divorce... this issue is long overdue...it has to put into rest..." don't impose your belief on other people, because it is unfair.."..
@@felipecostillas3798 how about imposing the idea of broken family to kids his/her? Hypocrisy. Selfish
@@PewPewJet sorry, I'm not a guidance counsellor, im not well position to answer that question..
@@felipecostillas3798 but you are a parent, a sibling, an aunt/uncle, who doesnt feel sorry for the kids broken home/family? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
those people are just delusional,,it doesn't mean its ok for you, then ok for someone else,,if vatican and philippines the only country with no divorce and yet a country with bunch of corrupt but so religious,,then i dont know what;s with the mentality of anti divorce then,,if it is for the good of whole?
Ang pinag sama ng Diyos hindi dapat paghiwalayin ng tao. Nasa bible po yan
Very enlightening.
The key here is marriage is a sacrament. Proponents of the divorce law see this as just a way of ending a marriage and starting anew. Marriage is not for everyone hence before entering one, one should have a discernment of what one is getting into. God bless!
"Marriage is not for everyone hence before entering one, one should have a discernment of what one is getting into. hence before entering one, one should have a discernment of what one is getting into." --- Easier said than Done! 🙂. Lahat ng ikinasal SUMUMPA SILA NG "TILL DEATH TO US PART." Lahat yan maski-anong DISCERNMENT YAN - GOD's or PEOPLE way - they would say ready na sila at sila ay nag-mamahalan at walang makakasira and di sila maghihiwalay. Lahat yan pare. 🙂. Remember there is a pre-marriage counselling (required) both spiritual and professional bago ikasal ang groom and bride. And it would last 3 to 4 hours. There are successful marriages and there are failed marriages. That's the reality. "Marriage is not for everyone?" - O common tell that to the marines or kay Mang Maryo or kay Aling Iska. 🙂
From the legal perspective, “constitutionality precedes necessity or benefits.”
YES TO DIVORCE!!!!
If one will think of only of themselves and not your children's trauma when one get divorced, you will favor divorce... if the parents can't endure marriage, the children will learn not to endure anything. Marriage is a vow and sacred, dont get married if you dont know its hardships. "Ang pag aasawa ay hindi kanin isusubo na pag napaso ay iluluwa".
Sa harapan ng room na walang fire exit may nakalagay... " wag pumasok kng ayaw mapaso"
Kung ayaw mo mg divorce huwag ka mg divorce. Sa gusto ng divorce hayaan mo kasi right nila iyon.
di mapapag usapan ang mga ganitong bagay kung iaalay natin sa panginoon ang pagsasama ng mag asawa. kailangan ang panginoon ay kasama sa buhay mag asawa. sa bibliya nasusulat kung pano magsama ang mag asawa. 100% walang maghihiwalay... all Glory to God 🛐
divorce law should be allowed because there are marriages that don't work out. No spouses will separate unless they wish it. Spouses who have strong bond, whatever you do, you can't separate them no matter what. when spouses go for divorce, that means before they talked about it, they are already separated. it's the opposite of marriage contract. couple don't get together because of marriage contract.
As u saud it, 2 persons do not go to marriage as merely a contract - it is a commitment to love and a commitment to work for the family together. If they do not want that commitment, then do not marry.
@@beautifullycreatable not wanting to have commitment does not cause not to marry. the goal of divorce is not for the one who continuously love and honored what he/she committed, but for the other spouse who is lost n refuses to amend perpetually.
It's unconstitutional tho 😂
Unahin sana yung anti dynasty law as stated on the constitution before this dividing bill. Nothing more damaging to a nation than a corrupt political dynasties who feds on the lowly and innocent people.
#YesToDivorce ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
At this point, I don't understand why we still don't have divorce here. Is it because of a law that was made by MEN in the time where 14-year old women were legally married? Is it because of religion, that people believe it is sanctimonious in the eyes of God? So, if I say I don't believe in God, shouldn't I be exempt from YOUR belief?
If you don't believe marriage should be dissolved at any given time, then don't freaking divorce. Let the option to end a something be available to everyone if and when that something was not working anymore. Abuse, both physical and emotional, is a very real reason why we should have this. Heck, even happiness. If both parties don't see a future with each anymore, what is the point? Because PEOPLE outside of the relationship are against it? Apakabobo, nakakairita.
People failed to understand the sacred of marriage itself. One thing that ruin it because the reason of marriage itself.. unwanted pregnancy, premarital sex, etc. If the meaning of sacred is no longer there then marriage it’s just matter of paper, while we forget that marriage life is God’s plan for us. I disagree with her analogy about “Fire Plan”. Still, I can’t judge people who want to divorce.
7 years ago i got married with my foreign husband and after 1 year of being married he cheated me and keft me with my son who is new born.. Till now no communication and support from him😢
My pag asa p po b aq maging msaya?😢nkatali po aq s kapirasong papel n d nmn aq nkasal.gus2 q nmn po mkawala s situation n nagpahirap s akin nuon p gng s ngaun 😢😢help po msakit s akin n nagaantay s divorce bill sna free po pra s mga nangangailangan tulad q.ipagkaloob nyo po soon dahil matanda n po aq at hangad q po my peace of mind.😢😢😢😢
Remember not all marriage works ,do not wait till insane happen.
Kailangan talaga my dugo noh para ipasa yan? Yung ngpapatayan na. hehehe
Debate with counties with divorce!
For those who are adhering to Absolute Divorce, why did you ever plan to get married in the first place?
@@maryannbolanos948 true. Collect and collect. Trophy. 🤣
Did you watch the argument? Watch again.
Divorce is an OPTION! An option that YOU can choose not to choose,,
@@rollylansamarita2557 No. You have an option not to get married and ruin a kid's childhood. 🤣
@@PewPewJet you are missing the point lol,, marriage it self is an option,, however when you entered it you should also have an option to be out of it because of abuse, cheating, and exploitation that you might suffer from it..
Absolute divorce para tapus na ang usapan
Sus maryusip wala namang pang support ang ama anong gagawin aber?hayaang mag nganga kasama mga anak ganun ba yung mga againts sa divorced?kaya tama na para makahinga naman ang mga kababaihan na my pangarap para sa future ng mga anak nila
Kung my divorce obliged yung tatay mgsupport sa mga anak. Kaya irresponsible ang mga lalaking Pilipino mg anak sa kun sino sinong babae kasi hindi cla liable.
But Will Contradict the Law of God who is Sovereign Ruler of the Universe, it's not about the church but about a God supposedly ruling us all in Theocratic way
I believe in God and I pray. But you know my friend that is the IDEAL. Na put God in the center. But it does not happen always. Even marriage counselling may di umuubra dyan. There are certain percentages of "failed marriages" you cannot deny that. So would you blame them kasi they did not follow God's words or try their best to save their marriage? And mahabang discussion yan - "Contradict The Law of God".
Divorce in the Philippines is only for the rich who can afford the expenses involved in the process from getting the services of a lawyer to the filing and court hearings appurtenant to it, just like annulment. The lower and middle classes cannot afford it, which is why, in my opinion, it will not be an effective solution to marital problems.
so what's your solution? all remedies require resources. Divorce when legalized will have a more accessible threshold compared to Annulment.
"Chemotherapy is often accessible only to the rich, with the lower and middle classes often not being able to afford it. Therefore, it is not an effective treatment for cancer."
If the problem here is accessibility then the focus should be on lowering barriers to those not in the upper classes, not just outright giving up on any hope of making this country a better place
Tapos mai scam pa nag bayad na ng mahal para annulment maiscam pa 😂 pera pera lang talaga. Mga mukang pera. Pinipilit ang annulment para pagkaperahan
Atty Calleja good job.
paano naging good job?
Gusto ko yung sinira muna ni Attorney yung argument ni kuya Attorney na puro Constitution Constitution blah-blah-blah, not about the people at all. Tapos tinapos niya with very strong analogies.
Bigyan na natin ng hustisya un mag aswang hindi na tlg magkasundo,,hindi lahat ng swerte pagdating sa relasyon ay katulad mo.
Basta! Kilalanin ang lalaki at babaeng asawahin!!! Kung dumating yong araw na ayaw ka na niya! Layasan!
@@keepcalm3275 dapat po wag ka pag makalat ng lahi.
👏
lawyers makes simple things complicated!
ipasa nyo na yang divorce bill pra maging legal na kami ng kumare ko..
hahaha
Ayon kay Atty. Jaypee Calleja, ang Absolute Divorce Bill ay naglalayong magbigay ng mas mabilis at mas murang paraan para sa mga mag-asawa na wakasan ang kanilang kasal. Layunin nitong protektahan ang mga nasa mapang-abusong relasyon at magbigay ng legal na opsyon upang makalaya sa mga walang pag-asang sitwasyon. Ito ay isang malaking hakbang para sa karapatan ng mga kababaihan at kalalakihan na nasa ganitong sitwasyon
#YESTODIVORCE❤❤❤❤❤❤
If we don't have a divorce law that even our poorest people can afford, don't get married.
If you get married and your marriage fails, you are the ones to be blamed!
We have the right to scape from family of aggressive and detrimental to our health and growth..go with divorce law .
Someday we all filipinos will understand how important divorce is. It's applicable for all failed marriage & better solution to all mankind.
Atty Santa Maria made a stronger point.
My annulment nga kaso nadi naman lahat mapag bigyan kahit makalbo kana jan sakaka file mu kung wala kang kapit waley din kaya real talk tayo senate wag puro plano la namang nagaganap
Ipasa nyo na lang ang divorce bill ...saka nyo na lang pagnilayan ang sinabi ni Hesus "kaya binigyan kayo ni Moses ng divorce paper dahil sa katigasan ng inyong ulo." Ipasa na, saka na lang kayo magnilay. Goodluck!
#yestodivorce
ano kaya pakialam ng ganitong katuwiran kung hindi sya apektado sa naghihirap na magaswa wala ng pagasa! kung sila maligaya sa sa kani kanilang asawa fine pero pano un hindi igagaya nila sa sarili nila???? ugad ang mga ganitong abuhado dahil gusto nila kutongan ang mga mahasawa hindi na maligaya sa pag sasama
Dahil marami sa atin ay nasa mababang level ng economy, lalaki lang ang problema kung may divorce. Magkano ang pa korte, yung suporta sa mga anak at iba pa na resposibilidad ng magasawa sa pamilya. Kung marirap ka, paano matutustusan ito?
Kailangan ata explika sa mamayan kung ano ang pros & cons ng diborsyo at mag pa plebisito ang estado, di lang ang iilan sa kongreso.
Bakit sobra ang pagtutol natin sa divorce law! Kung maganda ang takbo ng relationship ng isang pamily, hindi kailangan ito! Bakit hindi natin tignan yung mga pamilya magulo na, na nagsasama lang dahil sa kasal! Meron annulment pero very costly ang proseso!
Ang Canada! Nasa nagkaroon sila ng pinaka mababang 5.6% divorce rate sa 1k marriage! Ibig sabihin! Ang divorce ay nagagamit lang na ultimo remedyo sa paghihiwalay! At bago dadaan sa divorce proceedings, may mga proseso pang dadaanan para masalba ang marriage!
Let's us interpret the laws liberally, to suit the current needs/situation!
!!!!!!!! 😅
We have existing laws to address all of this we don't want a law that can morally bring down the future of other generations
It will be declared unconstitutional by supreme court the moment it passed 😂 change the Constitution first
puro kayu tutol magulo na ngae db di nyu kasi nararanasan kaya gnyn nlang ung pagtotul nyu wlang kwenta batas tlga dito sa pinas sege antayin nyu patayin ung mga babae ng mga kinakasma nila dhil Subra na ung gulo
true, they just so religously believe everything is right and its against GOD's will.But there are no separation of Power of the church and state, It should be a collaborative effort for the good of majority not the chosen few.
The highest law on the land is the will of the people. People created the Constitution and people voted for the current constitution. It is not the other way around.
The highest law on the land is 10 Commandments and Law of God..What God has United in Marriage, let no man divide..that includes you .divorce is Satan's agenda to destroy family and destroy marriage..divorce is not the answer..the family that prays together stay together
@@MarkPaul-y2d times like these remind me of the importance of the separation of the church and state. Ethically, the golden rule can be the guiding principle as every religion has a version of it.
yes it is true that the people created the constitution. But bear in mind that, if what you said, that the "will of the people should be paramount" over a law. Then we will going to have an anarchy where every one can do what he wills. It is the main reason why we created the government and our constitution and laws. For instance one person wants or will to get someone's property, without the government/constitution or laws. What do you think will happen?? Government is created so that excesses of our free will could be contained. Laws are passed so that we have proper ways on how to achieve things or work without doing/resorting to violence. If we only allow what the "people will" then we are all fuck_d up thats for sure. Bcoz not every one will agree on all things. It is the law that kept us from doing that, from going into the direction of anarchy. Therefore it should be the constitution that should always be followed. And not just what idea/propaganda is being popular today. The state should protect its constituents from what is called "impulsive behaviors" or those demagogues who are riding on popular issues like this one. The state should always prioritize what is best for the constituents not just today but for the generations to come. If they want to have a divorce they first have to change the constitutional provision regarding divorce or else it will be constitutional.
#YESTODIVORCE
If only fancy words, good grammar and diction could feed the poor and hungry.
The Bernas argument got destroyed 🎉
may batas naman na poprotekta sa mga naaabuso mentally or physically dba?
if divorce ay maging batas, baka naman maging abusive ung tao? since may divorce naman, they will tend to hurt their spouses, then do it again again and again.
??
even churches (House of God) have fire exits...will God allow his house to burn down?
sana may study kung mas maganda bang myembro ng society ang mga anak na lumaki kasama ang magulang kumpara sa hiwalay na magulang. dun ako sa positive sa kids.
sa mag-asawa, wala akong pake at matatanda na mga yan. dun ako sa mga bata.
You are argue because according to the constitution.how about those more than 190 country you think there is no constitution on there country
Ang pinapag sama ng Diyos ay hindi dapat papag hiwalayin ng tao. Nasa bible yan at 90% ng filipino ay Christians. Hindi tayo dapat tumulad sa mga liberated countries
Basta isa lang masbai ko, hindi ang tao gumawa ng kasal. Kaya wag nyong salaulaiin ang kasal.
Kung kayo inaabuso hiwalayan nyo. Pero wag ma kayong magpakasal kasi di naman kayo sure kung hanggang sa kamatay kayo magsasama ng partner nyo.
Married is sacred, kaya kung sakali man na magpapakasal kayo yong naghihingalo na kayo magpakasal para tiyak nyo na di na kayo ulit mag divorce.
Dahil sabi sa sinumpaan ng ikinakasal ay till death do us part. Paano ang sinumpaan kung mag divorce pala kayo.
Kaya dapat wag na kayo magpakasal kung mag divorce lang naman kayo.
that's just for christians
not all marriages swear on that
Fyi madami kinakasal na nagkamali kaya nga need ang divorce eh may tao ok lang hangat nililigawan pro once na kayo na madami na mabago
Atty Sta Maria should go back to the Word
You have to ask the person's involved not those who.do not experienced irreversible couple relationship..peace of mind to both parties should be considered.family should live harmonious not chaos..broken family for such long time will never be the same again it needs to be settled accdg to their conscience..Phil's need divorce law
What no 😂 it has more cons than pro plus it's unconstitutional
if the law is passed, remember its not only married will be affected by divorce law, but those who will also get married in the future.
The world’s morality is towards the pit of misery… i pray Filipinos will not follow suit. #NoToDivorce
Sabi nga ni Fr Ripperger, all socities will go down that road. Ang tanong is hanggang kailan naten ipaglalaban at poprotektahan ang ating pinangangalagang magagandang asal at prinsipyo.
This law is favour only sa mga walang Love sa puso at sa mga walang kasiyahan sa buhay. Therefore, this must be issued with highly paid in amount. Whether it's conflict or not in a previous law, mostly in the Laws of God.
Hopefully, Filipinos will be awaken from a long sleep....
For those single people, DO NOT ENGAGE in marriage.. because there is not exit door provided by the law...
Mag-live in nlng kayu.
Funny, you debate on divorce but you don't debate on battered wives and irresponsible parents!
Huh? Don’t we have a law for abandonment like VAWC and child abuse?
Divorce in any form is natural. Separations are inevitable. Enough of the latin! It doesn’t impress the audience. Outdated.
Ako nga catholic pero hindi na ko naniniwala sa kanila.😂 sino bang Diyos ang may gustong magkapatayan ang mag asawa? Tapos pinayagan ang annulment pero divorce hindi? 😂 nakakatawa. Dahil ng sa kapirasong papel, swerte naman ng mag bebenefits na kahit matagal na kayong hiwalay sya pa din makakakuha😅 ayusin nyo batas nyo wag puro pera. May annulment nga sobrang tagal mahal na sobrang tagal pang maipasa. Halatang pinagkakaperahan lang 😂 #YesToDivorce
True may mga tao kasing mababa Pag iisip kaya nga may mga grounds
Makipagpamilya ka tapos sa divorce bubuo ka Uli ng bagong pamilya. Ang dami mo nang pamilya. Unfortunately, I'm for monogamy.
Yes to divorce , daming babae ang nag durusa sa mga babaerong asawa,
Lol😂😂😂 mas malala kung hindi lang babaero, lalakero pa...
Constitution? Sino ba mga nasunod dito? Nasunod ba mga kagustuhan ng taong bayan? Hindi! Sabi noon sa news, "the Philippine constitution is made by the rich for the rich"! Never for the people!
Divorce law = lawyers will make more money
So when the divorce bill is passed what will happen to child support. Since many will move on and start new families and many children will not recieve support because the salary is bot enough. I guess we need a law like many western countries that if you dont pay your child support you go to jail.
E kung nag tagalog ka jan edi sana mas maintindihan yang pinaglalaban jan!hahahayy hirap na po ba magtagalog ang lahat? SO ETONG topic na to for the rich people lang talaga ang mga poor at di nakaka intindi ng english jan tabi tabi and pass nalang ang mga ferson
Being a Christian who believes in the goodness of jesus, I choose to stand by Him.
Him, being good, much more hollier than any of us, including those who push for divorce;
I will always trust in his goodness and wisdom.
God has designed marriage to be sacred; hence, to be respected by all, primarily and especially married couples themselves.
I firmly believe that God wants couples to love and respect their espouses and commit themselves to this till death, as they promised in marriage.
It is sad and unfortunate that christians who are pro divorce don't seem to realize that divorce is not just a separation between a husband and a wife; it is actually a separation from the Lord.
Christians who accept divorce are rejecting Jesus, who himself teaches:
"Whatever that God has joined together, let no man separate"
How could you claim to be a Christian, and yet rejecting Christ's teachings?
Isn't that ironic and hypocritical?
wala akong pake
problema ninyong mga kristiyano lamang yan
the Philippines is not a theocracy. so pwede ba, huwag niyong idamay ang buong bansa sa kagaguhan ng kristiyano lamang
Ang pinag sama ng Diyos ay hindi dapat papag hiwalayin ng tao. Nasa bible po yan at ang Philippines ay Catholic country. Ayaw ng simbahan ng divorce
@@MN-pb2gw 1. saan mismo sa putanginang bibliya mo?
2. so lahat ba ng gustuhin ng kristiyano sa pilipinas masusunod, ganun ba?
@@MN-pb2gw hindi gobyerno ang damasong simbahan mo
Kailan pa ba naging constitutional ang mga mambabatas ntin? 😂😂😂
the world left Filipinos in the cave
sometimes it's better to live in the cave than outside of it.
@@yuridelossantos569and that sometimes doesnt apply to this situation. If you want to live in a cave go ahead. Dont enforce your beliefs to the entire population.
@@moioioio there are things that are more important than that belief of yours.
Blame the Catholic Church
it prevents you from going back into the cave.
Ang pinag sama ng Diyos ay hindi dapat pag hiwalayin ng Tao. Nasa Bible po yan
Meron na pong annulment sa Pilipinas recognized by the Catholic Church and by the govt. Ano pong pinagkaiba sa divorce?
@@Vision7728No to Divorce in the Philippines
This clearly shows that they don't care for the suffering wives and children of our country!
@@butchfajardo8832 lol suffering of kids? Suffering of kids because of broken family how about that? 🤣
Mandatory Pre-nup for all, panget, pogi, rich & poor.
#NoToDivorce
#NoToDivorce
READ BIBLE, WE Are MAJORITY CHRISTIAN..
Wow👏👏👏👏👏👏👏✌ nice talaga pro divorce po ako.
Sana po tagalog para maunawaan at maintindihan naming hindi gaanong makaintindi ng divocre pls.
Funny, you debate on divorce but you don't debate on battered wives and irresponsible parents!
@@butchfajardo8832 di ba responsibilidad mo na kilalanin mo muna magiging partner mo bago mo asawahin? If later nya pinakita kung anong totoong ugali nya kasalanan mo na yun. Papalakihin mo sa broken family mga anak mo. Just for selfish reason and lack of diligence to know the partner thoroughly
@@PewPewJet, tanungin mo mga binubog na misis. Hindi mo malalaman kapag mag jowa pa kayo na nang bubugbog siya! Lalabas lang yun kapag kasal na kayo!
Yes, it's your job na kumilatis pero hindi mo malalaman kung sadya kang niloloko! Sa huli mo nalang malalaman! Kapag kasal ka na!
@@PewPewJet, malinaw na wala ka pang alam sa pag pili ng asawa. Tip ko sa iyo, mag pakilatis ka sa mga old folks! Baka magulat ka na wala ka pang alam sa pag ibig at pag pili ng asawa!
@@PewPewJet, how sure are you na yung pinili mo eh nag papakita ng true colors niya? Ito ang isa na tanungin mo sa mga old folks natin!
@@butchfajardo8832 then its the problem of the deceived. Kaya nga may kasabihan, walang maloloko kung hindi magpagpapaloko. Responsilidad naten hukayin lahat ng baho ng mapapangasawa.
#NoToDivorce
READ BIBLE, WE Are MAJORITY CHRISTIAN..
#NoToDivorce
READ BIBLE, WE Are MAJORITY CHRISTIAN..
May Christian po ba na nangangaliwa? At nanakit physically, mentally n emotionally?
#NoToDivorce
READ BIBLE, WE Are MAJORITY CHRISTIAN..
#NoToDivorce
READ BIBLE, WE Are MAJORITY CHRISTIAN..
Bawal din naman makiapid o saktan ang mga asawa sabi ng Bible ah. Dami nga dyan mga pari mismo na makasalanan din. Hindi lang dahil sa religion para hindi ipatupad yan. 😂 wala ka na ba mabigat na dahilan dahil lang ba sa christian ka? 😂
but the bible does allow divorce po
Sige, no divorce for you kahit na pwedeng one day patayin ka na ng asawa mo sa harapan ng mga anak mo. Alam mo ba ang magiging epekto non sa mental health ng mga anak mo? And in the long run, sa iyo din?