Thank you. Another example of this is Rhonda Rousy. She doesn't give a shit about all this women's rights bullcrap She's proven them all wrong and she knows it.
@Brother John That's not important though. There are unanimously agreed upon standards that are required to be achieved to participate in the military. If you can't reach those standards, tough.
@@EmoPeter2000 true, just dont drop the standards at all. If women can't make it, well then what? It's not like we're losing something. We didnt have women in the infantry before and it'll be the same. Plus if any woman does make it, which I believe they eventually can, she'll truly be highly respected and seen as one of the VERY few.
Till she bitches about being on her period or right before we’re supposed to leave she gets pregnant and puts the rest of them -1 and that’s just assuming there’s only one. We had 3 just in our company (small combat mos not infantry tho) get pregnant and didn’t deploy with us and left us 3 short. And we were already short... fuck that... there is faaar more risk with having women in
i am female and if i were military i would put myself to set the goals that the men have so i wouldn't f'n die. some woman can actually be as strong as the men but some just stay at their lower standards, i think they should have same requirements if anything, and woman should do more intense training or something. not completely excluded Edit: Wow, y'all. Almost a year later and I have learned a lot through these comments about the topic and humans as a whole. Some people in these comments are intelligent and we both have learned from each other while debating. But if your coming to be to basically spam "you're wrong!" "you're wrong!" over and over, I do not want to debate you and your unmovable presuppositions and deal with your cognitive dissonance.
@@supportsniper4626 You do realize that if military training women was any harder, they’d have to let every woman know that after their service they’ll be infertile. And no a woman can’t be as strong as a man, only if the effort is unequal. If you take a man and woman, have them train their hardest for the same amount of time, and the man will win.
Her voice changed and she got emotional when she mentioned "infertility". It definitely wasn't easy for her to go through it. Why would any woman want to push themselves to the brink of destruction? Sometimes equality isn't the answer. Key differences make us who were are.
She isn’t totally infertile. What happens is when women lose too much body fat, they become infertile during that time period. Bottom line is this. Women know good and well they don’t want to take on the burden of a man. It’s all smoke and mirrors when females ask for equality. Females only want equality when it’s in an air conditioned building and they want the high paying jobs in those roles only. This woman had to only go through a portion of what the men did and it broke her, so she knows first hand that women can’t physically compete with men.
Because usually the only ones who push "equality", are the ones who are NOT impacted by this. No sane woman would do something like this to "prove" that women are equal to the men in terms of strength, mental strength etc..
Simp PS: I apologize. I shouldn't have used the word simp inappropriately. It was completely unnecessary and doesn't suit the context. My sincere apologies to any simps whom I may have offended.
This woman right here is a sigma female. She never lied about what her abilities is; Understands the limits; accepted the shortcomings of her gender; proceeds to continue to serves her country despite the hardships. Definitely she has an sigma mindset.
Yeah, she took on as much responsibility as she thought she could carry and had the humility to lay down the burden when it became too much for her - absolute respect, both for her dedication to herself and her people and her acknowledgement of her limits - many people are promoted to the point of incompetence and break down permanently, it takes a special kind of person to lay down their current duties and resume serving in a different capacity with grace. 100% respect.
@@youareaspook5897 amen. Glad to have people like her in the military. When the enemy roll up to your door, we need people with common sense and calm mindset
Elix 89 if the standards are the same and everyone in the battlefield meets them shouldn’t a woman be able to carry a brother in arms to safety? Not trying to fight just saying
1: Open up the infantry to women 2: women don’t want to be in the infantry 3: review numbers after 12 months 4: see numbers are much lower than was hoped for. 5. Lower the fitness standards to try and pump up the numbers 6. Watch the unit slowly deteriorate due to lower quality soldiers passing through 7: numbers still are not high enough, blame the patriarchy and “toxic masculine culture” of the marines Rinse and repeat.
Drakonus equality of humanity, equality of opportunity, and equal measure of merit. No boundaries but also no lowered standards. I’m all good with a women who wants to destroy her body for her country but it’s gotta be at the same level as all that enter that role
Yes, that. The 'front line'. Why does nobody understand the concept? Women on front lines are rarer than serial killers. Most women are in logistics or medical positions in the military, where they don't have much of a use for that type of physical strength in the first place.
We did this on school once, the girls were very confident that they could beat boys in a wrestling competition because they took classes. The boys didn’t go hard on them and 1 boy lost because he was going easy, the girl started yelling that he was nothing and she could beat him all day. The boy asked a rematch to our PE teacher and yeah..... she cried and ran away because he bodyslammed her and had her in a choke hold:-)
Arkx123 last year we were a all boys class and we had the same teacher, same rules but we could take a hit and still laugh about it. And yeah this year there’s girls and we gotta take it easier
When I went through Marine Corps bootcamp, the disparity in training was a joke. Men did standard push-ups, women on their knees. Men did pull-ups, women hung from the bar for a few seconds. Women skipped upper body intensive portions of the obstacle course. When we shot the rifle, they didn't even bother going to the 500-yard line. Excuse me? When you have that type of disparity in training requirements (and outright skipping obstacles), what does that tell you? You can force-feed all the feminism and equality you want down a society's collective throat, but on the battlefield reality prevails. Ask a woman to carry her gear plus a 225 lb. man off the battlefield for medical treatment and you are guaranteed not one dead Marine, but two.
thats cuz americans treat women like princesses and breed princesses .. all other countries that have them tell them ... do as the guys do or get out ... if they cant cut it they cant cut it .. weeds out the princesses like this disgrace of a marine capt
Same thing in the Israeli's much publicized foray into co-ed frontline military. Despite significantly lowering standards for females, 46% of them are too injured from training at any given time to be operational.
IN ECUADOR, WHERE THE 21 CENTURY SOCIALISTS NEARLY DESTROYED THE COUNTRY AND THE ARMED FORCES IN TEN YEARS OF CORRUPTION, IT IS INCREDIBLY UNFAIR. FEMALE SOLDIERS OF ANY RANK ARE USUALLY TREATED LIKE QUEENS, THEY ARE "SOLDIERS" OR "WOMEN" ACCORDING TO THE SITUATION, THEY USUALLY DO NOT MEET ENTRY STANDARDS, SUCH AS HEIGHT AND FITNESS, AND ONCE OFFICERS, ALMOST ALWAYS FATTEN UP, FAIL PHYSICAL TESTS, AVOID JOBS AND MILITARY RESPONSABILITIES THAT IMPLY RISK LEAVING THEM TO MEN, BUT ARE ALWAYS READY FOR TRIPS ABROAD, THEY PROTECT AND COVER UP THEIR FEMALE BUDDIES, AND IF YOU WANT TO DISCIPLINE THEM, THEY WILL REPORT YOU FOR SEXUAL HARASSMENT.
metallicak5 There's a reason why! it's because she's valued more, and that she's weak cute and vulnerable, her special treatments are based on the fact she's a woman. The public eye looks at the men as he can take care of himself even if he's captured and near death, nobody would be in such distress to get him. We see examples of this with battered woman they get shelters and government funding to take care of them with all these problems they face, We sure don't see these programs existing for battered men under such distress as civilians! so that's how unfair it is for men. men get nothing no help when combatted with such bullshit!.
Maybe I mixed up the nation, or I'm thinking of WW1, but I've heard stories and seen pictures of dead female soldiers who were brutally raped until dead, stabbed in the vagina, etc.
@@usernameluis305 the anchor didn't seem to blink at that. Best case scenario she though a "Sorry to hear that." would come of wrong, somehow. Worst case scenario she though nothing of importance was lost. Either way, I myself was very sorry to hear that.
7 лет назад+3400
The military and police should not be social experiments in equality just to make people feel good. Forced diversity leads to weakness.
E M Military and police shouldn't be spoken of together as if somehow they are the same. American government is about checks and balances, and separation of powers is one of those checks. For example, a rogue city police force would ultimately be checked and countered by the military. The police shouldn't be acting and equipping themselves as if they are somehow military, nor should they ever be allowed to train with the military. As a career military veteran I find the militarization of police in America disgusting and dangerous.
E M as I said before it there are plenty of women officers that can handle themselves I know plenty of them I know plenty of EMTs that can handle themselves I'm going to school to be a CNA there are plenty of nurses that can handle stuff that are women military is a different thing but here's the thing she's braver than I am when it comes to wanting to serve my country there is a reason that the police have pepper spray they have clubs they have guns to protect themselves
7 лет назад+51
Holly Gillian - What? You're talking specifically about women, I'm talking about lowering standards overall to appease some sense of equality. Good for anyone who can make the grade, but standards should never be lowered to accommodate more of any group.
Holly Gillison that's a lie. Because femenest themselfs are trying to get special treatment and lobying to make the test easier for women. But whatever makes you feel warm and fuzzy inside.
Nedal Salman when I said officers I meant police but I'm saying women can handle a lot lot of different things different jobs I'm thinking this woman for her service
@Saturn not as rare as you might think, a large amount of Olympians who are in a strenuous physical field end up with hormonal and reproductive issues in the long term
She's honest because she's honest. Women should abandon the "strong, independent powerful" nonsense because it makes them less feminine. Women are not supposed to be hard, they are supposed to be soft. Women are not supposed to be bullheaded, loud or forceful. They're supposed to be demure. In case you are one of the many people who have forgotten what a woman is, search for videos on "how to be feminine" and "how to be ladylike"
At no point did she say women are physically inferior to men. She also did not say women should not be allowed into the infantry. The title of this video is complete click-bait bullshit
I think she was just provoking her to outright say that men are better suited for the position for the headline. She's a reporter so I don't doubt that she's just looking for a soundbite, especially with the hypocrisy of the entire situation.
@@breathej.4872 pretty sure men who hate who hate woman are not looked at normal😂 I think the word your looking for is incel and they are not looked at as normal by any means
I was a third generation military person who served eight years in the army. I can honestly say it was a bad idea to let women into front line roles. It’s bad enough to fight the enemy, but to have to carry someone who couldn’t carry you if you get injured makes it worse. I was in training situations where the women assigned with us couldn’t carry the camouflage netting. They would complain that it was too hard. These same women would get pregnant just to get out of the military.
What you said is so true and seemingly obvious, it makes me wonder if the people who are pushing for this have ever seen combat...it just doesn't make sense.
Flying Tanker That’s the thing about the military generally. We actually have common sense and the common sense that speaking the truth is right, regardless of the liberals sticking out their bottom lips, throwing a tantrum and crying (whatever it is they cry! Sexism, misogyny, bigotry, gender or identity politics etc etc) Facts are more important than feelings but the liberal left think feelings are more important than facts, logic or common sense.
using false data and follow on troops experience ... she is so full of shit her eyes will turn brown any moment ... I have served with women and they are invaluable assets in the thick of it ... they increase effectiveness of troops just by being there ...and add a new view on tactical situations making for a broader set of choices to do what must be done ... they are definately any man's equal in the field.
It's funny that the women who has actually weathered the storm is saying that women to join infantry is not the best idea, while the anchor who has barely stepped out of her air-conditioned studio is pushing really hard for it. Thanks friends. Never got so many likes.
She isn't necessarily pushing FOR it, it seems like she's mainly trying to get her to explain why she feels the way she does, so that people watching will know.
Dude come on, it’s Fox News. You clearly know where they stand with this and the way the interview is being done is to allow the guest to make their point. Really don’t know what you’re on about, this interview is set up to be in the favor of the guest.
Well I don't think a presidential fitness plan is the same thing as military service. It is fine to have sexed standards for say being healthy, or a men and women's league sports time, but it is another thing to have two standard for how well you can kill or be killed. Lets say we have an engineering competition something like "build a rocket" the fastest highest flying rocket wins, the gender ratio is irrelevant and will probably skew male as fewer women are going to give a fuck about rockets. In your example of national fitness or sports there is no external judgment, anyone can set up any rules for victory, but when there is external judgment, when you can't set the rules for victory, then all that matters is who ever has got the best ability. So lets say you need people that can drag other people out of a firefight, haul all their equipment by foot while shooting at people, you need people that can kill and not die, you can't create a different standard for men and women, unless the enemy is going to treat the women better! A universal military fitness standard would simply determine your role in war, from army base cook to special forces marine. There would be plenty of military roles that women would be fine at in even gender ratios, some even in combat, military pilots for example, women are usually smaller, lighter, have shorter heart to brain distance. Look at the air force, their biggest test is how many Gs you can take, that is it. Centrifugal force does not give you special credit because of your genitals.
+frbe0101 Give women easier condition. Thats fair, o wait. What about transgender for that matter? Heard of transmen approved in female sport. I think its gonna turn into transport hohohoho
San dro It is only a matter of time before some man who failed the male fitness standards for the military demands to be counted under the female standards as a transsexual. It will be like Carlynn Jenner being declared women of the year X1000. That is if the trans-loophole is made sooner of later lots of men are going to use it, it become an obvious and shameful farce.
+Mary Ellin What do you do if a commander give you an order for 10 km(or 10 mile) walk, then assault. Then run 1 km(1 mile) then make a patrol. It is the time you need physical strength. Having double standart do not create double field to fight. A person needed to fit field standart.
Tylor Lilly I'm not saying the zero has ever made it, matter of fact I would doubt that. On the other side of the coin, everything I've looked into they to gut the program in order for anyone to make, its all politics.
Tylor Lilly They did that for army infantry, I forget the time but for months zero woman passed the training will make standards. they crippled the program and even still more than half failed.
I don't get why feminists are pushing towards "equality" by demanding that women do what guys do! What's this obsession with doing things that men do?! They hate men, yet they want to be like men! Can't they just embrace and focus on the things that women are naturally better at?! It's like "Oh look, that guy is doing that thing which I think is cool, I must show that I can do it too otherwise he's being a misogynist!" but apparently the things that women do best are no longer cool for them, for some bizarre reason! :/ Feminists are like guys trapped in women's bodies who want to be guys but have all the privileges of being a woman! It's mental!
Spetsop because they want men to be obsolete. they're already working on ways for females to be impregnated by other females/themselves. m.slashdot.org/story/96820
JGSH13 Whatever. You are Insane, it isn't to make the Male of the species obsolete; we are not black widow spiders. and it would be impossible. tighten the top of you're tin-hat
JGSH13 well really, come on; this is what the comment section is for, debate - enlighten me. How would it even be possible, for the Female of our species to dominate the Males? Look at the specs? The Alien creators made that shit impossible. We are supposed to live in harmony, too bad their is so much control in this time, it makes fragile People unstable. God damn Gov. Media and dichotomizing by Race and Status! *Everyone. Is losing. They're shit*
Rain TheNiloticGirl You are obviously ignorant. We all know there are weak men and strong girls. But Biologically and logistically Men tend to be bigger and stronger. Don't make sweeping statements.
What's obviously a man? Anyway I don't think most women think it's sexist other than those crazy feminists. There are things that guy and girls excel differently in and guys are naturally way stronger and more dominant than girls. There are exceptions but feminist try to pretend there are no differences. Sometimes from person to person there is not much difference, but that doesn't mean that girls and guys are not different generally
@@eliasmagus5086 it's more than just physicality, the mere presence of a woman causes issues socially in the ranks, soldiers will be soldiers and such...
She sees what people refuse to see: men and women are made DIFFERENTLY. Why can't people see that. Men do some things better than women, and women do some things better than men.
apart of there anger is "Men can phsyically do things women cant" and then "Men choose not to do things women excel at" Its the very principal that men mostly feel "I can do everything better than you, other than the physical act of giving birth" from architecture to clothes design, to math and physics. I remember my auncle told me in 10th grade back in the mid 80s his highschool gym teacher stood him up in front of his class (6ft male 210lbs) that he was stronger and faster then 99% of all women who have ever lived (he was a pretty good track and field). the term they used to use back in the 80-70-60s was penis envy, women simply feeling they got the short end of the stick in the gender lottery. that has been subverted now into feminism the want for men to be viewed as equal to men in all areas in society. Feminism back then was women simply wanting to have the same governing rights and access, Feminism now is women saying "well im not exactly able to succeed with only the same access so you need to change the barrier for entry AND make laws for me only to garauntee i succeed". I thnk every man today would be a 60s feminist "yeah let them vote, yeah let them get a bank loan, yeah let them run for office" I dont think we have an issue with that anymore new feminism though is an entirely different beast based off inequality
You dont prove shit with your one sentence comments. All you do is emphasize on the lack of ability to bring up actual facts to back up your "wrong but ok" bullshit.
Reminds of an Indian commander who ended the debate with a simple question " Can you piss, take a shit and change your sanitary Napkin in front of me and the rest of the unit? "
i am female and if i were military i would put myself to set the goals that the men have so i wouldn't f'n die. some woman can actually be as strong as the men but some just stay at their lower standards, i think they should have same requirements if anything, and woman should do more intense training or something. not completely excluded, tho.
If anything, if they are “inferior to men” and they get recruited, wouldn’t that feel so much better? You did the same training as someone better than you, and you may have gotten recruited, you beat all odds and made it!
If a woman would do the same thing as a man she would still be weaker, that's how nature works. The army doesn't need gender equality, it needs strength.
@@damianpicalau6642 The average man is stronger then the average girl, but if a girl trains, she could be as strong as the average man, it would just be harder.
I work underground in a mine setting up ground support, for every 15 split set bolts i carry, my female counterpart carrys 3. For every 2 mesh sheets i carry she carrys 0 because she cant even lift one. The kicker is i spent 1 year as a contractor to get signed on to a permanent role, and she got signed straight on with 10k a year more pay. We are all equal, some are just more equal then others...
@@anthonyperkins5856 yup, quotas that let whamen slip in ahead of actually qualified men for the same/better job. It's all a bullshit joke and I get sick of seeing it in businesses around me.
My mom was a marine for almost 11 years and switched as a Staff Sergeant to become a Navy Nurse and is now an O-6 after 34 years of service. She says the exact same thing.
@@Briselance She gave birth to me well after her time in the marines. She was in the nurse corps for about 2 years before she had my older sister and 4 years before she had me.
The people who serve know the difference, it’s the ones who sit behind a desk and write articles for stupid magazines that think they can fight a marine and win with ease.
She didn't mention to that Women don't do so well out in the field for weeks, sometimes months without showering. It's a fact Men are more built for this and even they struggle. These feminist must hate feminine energy.
Its kinda poetic when you look at it. Feminist would give up their ability to make babies (the function that defines womanhood) just to be like men...Its like they're literally turning to men, smh😪.. btw im not calling her a feminist.
Daniel Bell She underwent the same training as the men and that lead to a lotta problems including extreme weight loss, muscle atrophy, and infertility. This is only a portion of the training regiment but caused immense stress to her body. She literally wasn’t built for it.
Im in the army, and i find it despicable that now our pt standard has dropped to allow women to pass and not feel left out. Were trading national security for feelings.
Don't worry, with the way things are going, I feel like there's gonna be a wake-up call soon, and things like the military, masculinity, and feminism will go back to the way it was a hundred years ago.
I am a soldier in the austrian special forces the "Jagdkommando", we had several women (dozens) try to pass the entrance examination and not one was able to. There is a reason training in the military is so rigorous and standard is so high, because in combat that can mean the difference between life and death. If they pass the entrance exam, by all means, let them join, but there has to be ONE STANDARD for everybody.
Let's be clear, you are talking about fitness requirements for a special forces unit, correct? I agree that no one should be in the special forces who cannot pass the standardized testing and training. I am Canadian Armed Forces and to my knowledge there are no women working as assaulters in JTF2 (even if there were we wouldn't know about it because their identities are suppressed for obvious reasons). Canadians have allowed women into all positions since 1989 which means we have female infanteers and combat arms soldiers. They are the gross minority of combat arms because most women choose other trades. To be fair most men choose other trades though as the combat arms do not make up the majority of soldiers, sailors and airmen. The women I have met who are combat arms are fit and tough. I know lots of men who have worked with them and they have expressed no issues so long as they can keep up; this sentiment applies to men as well. If you can physically hack the combat arms they will force you to change trades regardless of your gender. The Canadian fitness standard called the FORCE test and the Battle Fitness Test are not prorated for gender or age which means every person in the the CAF must pass the same fitness test, period. There are incentive levels for the FORCE test now which account for age and gender but the minimum standard is the same for everyone. Beyond that all unit PT is done together and there is not a male/female version of PT. If we go on a march everyone carries the same weight, everyone goes the same distance and everyone has to finish by the same time. This also applies to runs and bodyweight training. There is more of an issue with certain trades being less fit than actual gender issues. There are additional physical standards based on specific occupations such as paratrooper, Search and Rescue Techs, Special Operations Forces, divers, Fire Fighters, flight crew and so on. These standards are also gender neutral which means any women in these positions have met that standard. I would take a fit women over an unfit man any day and that seems to be the sentiment with my male colleagues. There are women who are unfit for combat roles, but we must bear in mind there are lots of men who are unfit for those jobs too. Making a blanket statement that every woman is unfit does not bear out when the opportunities are made available.
Yes, in my case I am talking about fitness requirements for a special forces unit and as I said, if women pass the entrance exam, they should be allowed in. I am NOT suggesting NO WOMEN period. What I am saying, is that lowering standards for women just so they can "get in", could be really dangerous and potentially cost lives.
ridddix I agree 100% that standards, be they fitness testing or training rigors should not be changed to accommodate for gender or age, particularly in the case of special forces. I'm not sure why I gave you such a long reply before. I think I was just verbosely pointing out that single standards are being implemented in Canada and they are working.
there is no "IF" it will 100% without a doubt this would become the root cause of unnecessary deaths of otherwise able body men, an alpha male's Achilles heel is the ingrained biological compulsion is to be the protector of the weak and that is what will get him killed when Jane can't cope any longer and he has to take his focus off the fighting and surviving to carry her ass.
mar504 can’t agree more... Third wave feminism was necessary, unfortunately today’s “post third wave/fourth wave” feminism is so fucking dumb man, I’ve never seen so many hypocritical, manipulative , sluts , gold digging trashy ass women now called feminists in one single group, and the worst part is some men are so fucking taught to “treat the ladies right” when they’re literally getting fucked over so bad man
couldnt agree more its easier for a male.to be told that he cant father a child then it is to tell a female.that she cant have babies. i know cause i have been trough it my wife is still running on all cylinders and im misfiring. yes i would like to have a nother child but that aint happening.but i could imagine what my wife would go throu if they told her she wasnt working properly
Thanks for your service. Not the same war, but your brothers helped my family in Korea survive and make it to America. You and your fellow servicemen deserve unending honor.
I spent 23 years on urban fire dept and have worked with women both as a medic and fire fighter. They try not to put two females on same medic unit because to often they need to call for a lift assist which now puts another fire engine or medic out of service. And the top 10% of female fire fighters perform at a level worse then the worst 10% of the male firefighters consistently for all 23 years I was there. It just go's to show how much less qualified the other 90% of the women are. I also spent 6 years as an infantryman in the Army and the biggest concern if females fought in combat is if a sargeant has to order someone to charge a machine gun nest, and its between a man or women because no one else is available, does he order the man to do it because we are subconsciously protective of women or he orders the man to do it because he has a better chance of completing the task. Either way its not fair to the man.
@@tinaswain8537 I agree with you, I had a female partner for a while and I usually handled most of the physical stuff while she utilized her talent for empethizing with troubled people and understanding their emotions.
Tina Swain yea no, you dont hear men wanting to get kicked in the nuts over and over. You on the other hand have no problem saying you want another kid. Men = higher pain tolerance :). Or ginger females as proved by mythbusters
@Copperhead Sutton at my dept everyone had to take turns doing every job, there were no set jobs like just being truck driver/operator. I knew a few women who had the heart of a champion but the strength of a teenage boy. I felt bad that they had to struggle to prove themselves all the time.
I want equal rights for men and women. That means same pay, respect, and equal rights. But ladies, if the boat is sinking, don't expect me to give up my seat on the life raft. After all, we are equals.
Mr. Glabalabadubeestu The Mexican Cyclops more women than men die if shinking ships anyways www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2128812/Women-children-Sadly-quite-chivalrous-real-life--twice-men-survive-sinking-ships.html
Fanny Lindfors I smell some bs and contradictions there. Also do you think an article is credible? No, it's not. They can and will cherry pick information.
The only reason the women were given the lifeboat seats on the titanic was because the men didn't really believe the ship was going to sink. Women are usually more likely to die in a shipwreck, as they're pushed aside by the stronger men. Tired of seeing Titanic used as an excuse to shout bullshit. You know in a life or death situation most people are going to put their survival first. Gender doesn't matter in those situations.
“The Constitution only gives people the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself”- Thomas Jefferson. Women should have the right to join the military, but they need to be able to perform the necessary requirements to do so.
On average the average male has around 19 times the testosterone that the average women has. It’s just the genetics that make a man more well suited for these jobs
i am female and if i were military i would put myself to set the goals that the men have so i wouldn't f'n die. some woman can actually be as strong as the men but some just stay at their lower standards, i think they should have same requirements if anything, and woman should do more intense training or something. not completely excluded
@Assassin Clan no no, that's not what i said... I said, some woman CAN be as strong as men (aka some have the ability to do the EXTRA workouts that are required to reach a man's standard to be in the military)
@Assassin Clan I know that, but I said at least they need to fit the standards if they wanted to join, which I think would mean longer and harder trainings. So yea, I agree with your statement
Because for Generationd men are the ones doing work, going to war, farming, hunting and all other stuff. Meanwhile females are used to support the males so that they can keep on going
I served as a Cav Scout in an Infantry unit, and can honestly say that some women can do it. BUT, it should only be done if they are held to the same PT, training, etc standards. We're talking about lives being saved or lost here, not equality parades.
I am at 10th mountain. Most women here are smaller than most men. Nothing wrong with their character though. Most of them couldn't make it through ACFT.
You're damn right if the building is on fire I'm not gonna complain about a woman carrying me out of the building... but I've seen women in incredible shape struggle to carry the hose up 10 flights...I'd rather you tell me the most intelligent way to get there and the mindless grunt make the climb. :) I hope that came out right! :)
@@juana2631 ACFT is a joke! The minimum is easy, and a lot of people are still not passing. I do think there should be more battlebuddy carry or higher weight drag to simulate carrying a person, but then that would cost a lot of injuries and high medical expenses. AND, people still won't pass anyways! They will retire in 20 years with walking profile. Thanks for holding up standards! Good luck US military!
@@salazam yea, it is smart. Holding everyone to the same standards in training keeps weirdos like you off the battlefield. You'd probably get your stupidity caught on a trip wire.
Woman: "Papa, Charlie, Bravo we have a problem!" Man: "Here is the commandant speaking, what is the problem?" Woman: "Nevermind" Man: "Please explain" Woman: "You should know that!"
Operate Human SHIELD is a go. Tell them that they enemy is chauvinist pigs that support Trump and you won’t have enough transport to get them out there.
I'm an American. I'm a male. I want to get pregnant. It's my right as an American to do so. Now, go spend a billion dollars in research so you can find 1% of us who may be capable of doing so. Hurry, my feelings are hurt. Run along, and can I be on the news while you're at it. I'm courageous.
Well, it's like this, man. A VERY SMALL percentage of women want this position in combat arms. Of that percentage an astounding few, and I'm talking a shockingly small amount, will have what it takes to make it without lowering standards etc. So, America believes we should absolutely accommodate them by dropping millions of dollars in to surveys, studies, new bathroom facilities, more barracks and a slew of other issues I would have to think about. All this for literally 10 -15 women. And more than likely, burnout will hit and they will move on to another job set, and others, new ones that possibly will not follow in there steps because they will figure out what we have known. Infantry sucks. So, rather than say hey, this is how it is, we bend over backward to fulfill anyone's whim and fancy. So, I think America should pay for me to get pregnant, no matter the absurdity of it. Now, I'm not a woman hater. Love them, I personally oversaw the insertion of the FET team in Afghanistan (female engagement team) and those ladies did well at that job. But not everyone deserves a participation trophy, man. I just retired after 20 yrs in the Corps, and there is so much more to it than just saying OK give it a try.
I think the blind and those in wheelchairs should also have a chance to serve. Being blind should not prevent someone from being a fighter pilot or a forward observer in the artillery.I look forward to whole battalions of Marine infantry made up of quadriplegics and women. Also why should tourettes sydrome bar someone from being an air traffic controller at an airport or on a carrier. We must be fair and provide equality opportunity.
Mark Twain Hey, Samuel Clemens, beautiful post, man. While we're at it, midgets should be afforded game time in the NBA! What were we thinking? We need to accommodate all desires in this country.
There should be all female infantry battalions. Send them in first. Then while the enemy is incapacitated with hysterical laughter, the male infantry will come in and wipe out the enemy.
Had a political science professor back in the first Gulf War say something similar. If they win the battle, we can say you got beat by a bunch of women. If they lose, you beat a bunch of women. Its a win-win situation for us.
Some girls are naturally really bulky and some guys are pretty weak. I think they should just have a standard for phsycial fitness or training and not to lower the bar for girls. People should just do what they are best suited for
@@beach2550 yet the strongest female couldn't even best the average man yeah id still doubt she can carry one big ass 6"3 Man take your feelings aside mate.
I think the best solution for this is to put a serious physical test. If you pass it you can join in the frontline and if you don't you cant. Without looking at your gender
And when barely any women pass it, someone is going to scream that it's sexist and demand that the bar be lowered so more women can pass, as though the bar was deliberately set high for the express purpose of excluding women.
@@Dan_Brandybuck in this situation, the government should take complete control over the media and teach people that war isnt a joke and if women want equal rights they have to go through equal trainings, and they should remind people that there are men how didnt pass the test as well
ALI NABEEL woah woah there man government taking control of media seems a bit dictatorial but I do agree war isn’t a social experiment and it’s not a college campus there’s studies that prove that women in combat jobs don’t work.
i am female and if i were military i would put myself to set the goals that the men have so i wouldn't f'n die. some woman can actually be as strong as the men but some just stay at their lower standards, i think they should have same requirements if anything, and woman should do more intense training or something. not completely excluded, tho.
Taste of reality. Ask a women "What can a woman do that I man cannot" THEN ask "What can a man do that a woman cannot" The answers to those two questions solves the problem. NO OFFENSE TO WOMEN. Men and women are "Different". Do not equate that with "Inferior". If you do get offended get a grip on reality. I'm a genius I know.
Yeah. I’m a woman and yeah I’m better at so many things then my male friends but they are better then me at so many other things. We are biologically different.
I remember in basic there was this little guy, five two maybe a buck thirty - anyways the drill staff thought it would be funny to pair him up with the 6'4" bodybuilder who was about two fifty. The little guy earned the nickname of the 'ant' because an ant can lift up to fifty times its body weight. He picked up this giant and slung him over his shoulder in a fireman carry and ran the 600 meter test. The big guys hands were dragging in the muck, but the Ant didn't slow down one bit.
Anyone ever worked a job where half the people didn't want to be there or played on a sports team where half the team didn't care if they won as long as they played. It makes the whole team lose interest. If women aren't as physically or mentally tough they have no business in an organization that literally could mean the difference in our country existing or not.
The Russian's had it sorted in WWII. Chick's played vitally important back up supply, and medical roles. Occasionally, they were called up into combat to make up the numbers in pretty much all fields and areas of conflict on the Eastern Front. Those who fought did themselves and their nation proud. My fave group are, "The Night Witches." Anyhow, the issue here though is Women were essentially reservist's and the Russians were fighting a defensive war when it was, "all hands to the pump." So to speak. Utilizing women for offensive/combat infantry operations on the ground over men, simply for the sake of pleasing a few idiots, is a fucking dumb move. History has proven capable Women have important roles to fulfill in the military, but throwing them in the front line unnecessarily is a waste of skill's better used elsewhere.
The closest women on the Eastern Front had to experience combat was in limited roles, mainly support roles. Women would be snipers, logistical supply runners, or they would help load and launch artillery batteries. There was not much else to it.
@@abdullahakhtar9824 propaganda sure but you gotta admit their achievements. They wouldn't become a propaganda tool if they didn't do anything impressive. Most of those females are snipers and bomber pilots which are basically support role which fits. Because they didn't need as much physical strength as the frontline infantry.
i am female and if i were military i would put myself to set the goals that the men have so i wouldn't f'n die. some woman can actually be as strong as the men but some just stay at their lower standards, i think they should have same requirements if anything, and woman should do more intense training or something. not completely excluded
I mean, genders can't be reversed here. It has to be a female reciting her experience as a female and how difficult it was. It's more a credible source than a man would say.
As soon as female professional Athletes can beat the male Athletes in the same sport against each other then go ahead and join any combat MOS you like. There is a reason as to why even in fucking sports females do not play against males, but yet here we are discussion if a Male Infantry soldier should put his hands into a Female Infantry Soldier. Hint here, it has nothing to do with sexism and has alot to do with the physical abilities of both Genders. Or whats all the schoolsport about? When boys have to throw nearly twice as far as girls to get the same fucking grade. Oh the boy finished 3 minutes faster then this girl here? Too bad, she gets an A and he gets a B. But go ahead and lecture me about how females are perfectly fit to join a Combat MOS. And whilst we are at it, why not draft females into the military aswell?
I agree with you on the majority of what you stated, usually men do preform better in sports than women, with some exceptions. The first Man vs Woman boxing match that I have been able to find, the woman (Helen Hildreth) was winning the match, up until it was stopped by Fred Wenck, a boxing commissioner at the time. Each case is different, but sadly, it seems women do get it easier due to just being women. Sucks, but this is our modern society for you
+glprime2814 Nah to be honest women having it easier is a very primitive look at male-female relationships. I mean, in animal instinct, it's the first notion we get that the females need to be protected... So it's not modern at all :P
If you take a female boxer and put her against a guy of equal skill...she will get murdered...absolutely murdered...the only time a female can compete against a man, is if she is extremely well trained and he isn't...did you happen to see the video, I forget her name...she is the greatest female boxer of all time...she got into muay tai...she went against a guy, that she outweighed and he was pretty much an amateur...he ko'd her in 1 round...knocked her out cold...took like 10 minutes for her to regain consciousness....this is why the olympic womens hockey team(the best females) practice with male high school kids...this is why, a male high school basket ball team could destroy the best WNBA team on the planet...easily....
*0* women out of *30* have passed men's infantry officer training. Truth be told, if I have to cover the front of a building and I have to trust a woman to keep the enemy from entering the back of the building and stabbing me in the back.... Let's just say there's no way in hell I'm getting any sleep that night. You can't have a someone who can be easily overpowered covering your 6. Enough of this nonsense. Even if one manages to make it through the training and ends up with her boots on the ground in a war zone, she's more a liability than an asset.
I remember taking the Presidential Physical Fitness tests in high school. Males had to do 20 pull ups (at least) and all women had to do was hang on the pull up bar for 20 seconds. I don't agree with all the commenters here, but on the topic of strength and endurance, there simply is no question that men do better than women.
Agreed, during a combat situation the team with a woman will be at a major disadvantage simply for the fact that all the men will unconsciously keep an eye on her. She will also be a liability physically-vise because women, even if they train hard, will always be weaker than men facing the same training (she could train a lot more to catch up, but then there's the risk she's gonna be more tired) and obviously getting her period in the middle of a fight can be a big problem too (be it her psychic abilities, need to change it down there every so often, or simple health risks involved). In case of a capture it's obvious what would happen to her (not like it didn't happen to men, but in far smaller numbers, with a woman it's pretty much a given it will happen and it's one of the reasons they were never allowed to wage war and why prostitutes earned good money wherever the military was stationed). Long story short, I'm all for women joining the military, but do the important jobs in the back (look at queen Elisabeth II.!) and leave the men on the frontlines, it'll be safer for both parties
That captain is the only one in the conversation that knows what she’s saying. Semper Fi Captain. Men and Women are different. We’re supposed to be. Regardless of what the liberals think.
Nel's Wolf You should know that IQ is dependent on standard deviations on an interval of 10. This means that 68% of people fall between 90 and 110 IQ points. And 95% fall between 80 and 120. And so on. Literally by the very design of the IQ score, it is impossible for your claim to be true. (I get that you're just trying to hyperbolize, but it doesn't really work in this context)
When I was a young Marine and went to NCO school in MCRD San Diego (1990), I had as one of my instructors a female Marine by the name of Sgt Tulley ( If my memory serves me correctly). She could out run, out hike ( hump for us Marines) and out shine most male Marines. I asked her one day about what she thought about women Marines in combat units and she simply said " hell no". Even though she could hold her own, she said she thought it was crazy to do that. I respected her for her candor.
i think its esasier to find woman who can endure, but in terms of strength, fireman carry. lift someone out of a fox hole ect. . its just not do abble.
I used to believe (simplistically, I admit): "if they pass the same standards as men, sure, they are welcome". That's until I approached the Army and talked with many of its members who enlightened me about the psychological aspects of serving as a women, the pressure it generates, etc... Don't get me wrong, I am sure there is a place for women in any army, in which capacity they can sometimes outshine the men. A female can be an excellent pilot, analyst, translator, drill instructor, prison guard, general, you name it. Just need to admit that the reverse is true: there are things men do better, and there is even missions where employing a female would actually be *detrimental*, and that is just a fact of life we need to accept.
My younger daughter is in the Army. She's a Sgt. She's still in. Even though she can do the PT, she says she always struggles with it more than the guys. And SHE IS one, tough, chick!. My older daughter was a Quartermaster, in the Navy for five years. She hated it. One term, and out.
@@dragunovbushcraft152 Of all the few girls I actually knew (Which was like a handful because I'm a loser lmao) only one friend actually passed the requirements and managed to join the infantry. And even then after deployment a few times she couldn't stand shooting other people so she switched to being a combat medic instead, preferring to save as many lives as possible in combat instead of taking it. She's no longer alive, killed while trying to help a critically injured enemy troop. The sweetest people always die young for some reason.
yes . but that doesn’t mean women don’t deserve the same opportunities and respect as men. personally, i know plenty of women who has what it takes it be a marine more than certain men i know. yet i still agree we’re different in many ways, i think in rare cases there are women who CAN do these things-so why not give them the opportunity to do so? it just seems silly to me. just because women would be let in infantry doesn’t mean it would automatically be female dominated. there’s still going to be more men then women- that’s inevitable. if there’s a couple ABLE women on the front lines then i don’t see the problem. over the years there has been less and less marines. so to reject a completely trained and abled marine just because she’s a women is quite silly.
It's true, the military is not sexist, they are just PRACTICAL. This officer said it all. Women can't physically handle the same amount of rigor that a man can, but there ARE ways for them to serve in the military, just DIFFERENT ways.
+Brian Merritt If they are so "practical" then why hasn't the American military taken any new territory in the last few hundred years? It would be very practical to invade Canada or Mexico or a perhaps some of these Islands Nations.....but they don't: why is that? It's because the military has become completely subservient to the interests of the globalist bankers who are very practical in making sure the military does their dirty work for them; opening up markets which they want. So, yeah, if you are a bank or Warren Buffett, the American Military is super-practical, but otherwise not-so-much.
The part that shocked me was she tried so hard he cant have kids and even then didnt reach the level of a man. Good for her in standing for her beliefs and joining but thats one hell of a sacrifice
I'm gonna make this simple. You're on enemy ground on mission, you get shot in the leg, you have to be carried a mile to be safely medivaced. Would you rather an average sized man, or woman carry you out. I understand there are outliers, but the average infantry woman wouldn't be successful. But the average, combat-trained man would more than likely be capable.
If they can pass the fitness test then yes, they are qualified to be there just as every man who qualified. The issue is having to lower the standards for women when those standards are what keep the infantry prepared. Don't make this harder than it needs to be. Its a rather simple concept.
"As women, we demand equal opportunities in the military. We want jobs men do because women can do anything a man can... but the military shouldn't be able to order us to deploy to combat zones and fight because we're women." Equality in 2015.
+hsiehman One actually exceptional, high achieving lady in military will just be the 'bragging rights' for a thousand flabby feminists that will never dread the Draft ever.
Your either in combat rolls like men, or your not?....Everybody from both genders will automatically be enrolled into severe combat areas, and everybody will pull their own weight. Literally.....Women WILL be told to go combat ready at a moments notice, just like the men........It's called gender equality.
For fucks sake, you don't try out combat. Are you fucking kidding me with that? Here girls, try out killing someone. See if you like it. You either can fucking do it, or you can't. There is so much more that goes into it than pulling a damn trigger. This marine should be applauded. It broke my heart to hear her say that combat made her infertile. These feminists need to listen to her. This isn't a game, it's not something you try out. You women who want this better understand that if you go into combat, you better be able to do exactly what your male counterparts can do. They are trusting you to be up to the task. If you're not, you have just betrayed your brother in arms. If you can't pass the male standards, you are not up to the task.
There are way too many movies out now that have over-glorified hyped-up the miniscule roles that women have played in recent conflicts. Now, you have women out there who actually believe a woman can kick a Man's ass in combat. I'm actually HOPING for the day when women's KIA numbers exceed those of Men, so we can hoist a healthy dose of reality on all the feminist retards out there, and maybe get back to sensibility and logic!
but you can't use numbers and statistics against feminists? didn't work against the wage gap, didn't work about rape statistics so why would it work now :D
So I'm a female and I believe in equal rights for men and women. We shouldn't put women, nor men, in these stereotypical roles. However, when it comes to physical strength I Know that average women cannot match up to the average man. I think it's dangerous and irresponsible putting females in combat positions in our military. Believe me, I wish we were as strong as men but it's just not the way we were built. I've come to except that MAYBE women will naturally be better caregivers and men better muscles. If your average female cannot carry your average male comrade out of harms way when he needs it, that's a man left behind for the enemy or a female comrade accompanying him for the ride cause she couldn't retreat to a safe location quickly enough. I mean equality would be great and all but, to me, you literally have to be EQUAL to receive the same treatment. (Equal strength for the job, equal intelligence for the job, equal experience, etc.) I could go on forever but you know, no one would really read past this.
Agree with you Vanessa Torres. What's important is who to best get the job done. A dolphin is a superior swimmer, and a tiger is superior hunter in forests. Equality does not mean the dolphin is supposed to be able to hunt in forest just as well as a tiger could: that's just stupid. Equal standing as in equal respect and equal voice, yes, but people should take jobs based on what they can do best at, and leave the political quotas out.
most people when doing extended patrols either wear diapers or load their shorts as needed ... the women i served with wore and brought all the needed feminine products required .. which also double duty as excellent gauze packs for open wounds ... women are worth being in the front lines ... i know this from experience.
@@0623kaboom Just depends. If you gotta lug their SAW and kit on your back through the desert because they're too weak... not so much. I think it all boils down to maintaining the standards. If they can meet them, heck yeah, fire it up!
![Transgender Drill Instructor | Kill, Die, Laugh Episode 2 [half-o-sode]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/rwIypE-QWAk/mqdefault.jpg)
Hey look ladies, an actual strong woman who isn't insecure like the women who can't admit reality.
preach
Thank you. Another example of this is Rhonda Rousy. She doesn't give a shit about all this women's rights bullcrap She's proven them all wrong and she knows it.
Stronger than you, bud😂😂🤣🤣.
@@salvatoretessio4932 who exactly are you replying to?
@@salvatoretessio4932 Yeah she's so strong they needed to heavily lower the military requirements for her
I think women should be allowed to be in the military, but they shouldn’t change the requirements for both physical fitness and mental fitness.
Exactly. Any woman that can keep up with the men and do the job they are assigned to the proper way is good in my book.
@Brother John That's not important though.
There are unanimously agreed upon standards that are required to be achieved to participate in the military.
If you can't reach those standards, tough.
@@EmoPeter2000 true, just dont drop the standards at all. If women can't make it, well then what? It's not like we're losing something. We didnt have women in the infantry before and it'll be the same. Plus if any woman does make it, which I believe they eventually can, she'll truly be highly respected and seen as one of the VERY few.
I'd agree... If you can ruck with me, shoot with me and all, you're a welcome addition to my team. If you can't, just go worldwide.
Till she bitches about being on her period or right before we’re supposed to leave she gets pregnant and puts the rest of them -1 and that’s just assuming there’s only one. We had 3 just in our company (small combat mos not infantry tho) get pregnant and didn’t deploy with us and left us 3 short. And we were already short... fuck that... there is faaar more risk with having women in
This is just a person who lives in reality, nothing too complicated.
i am female and if i were military i would put myself to set the goals that the men have so i wouldn't f'n die. some woman can actually be as strong as the men but some just stay at their lower standards,
i think they should have same requirements if anything, and woman should do more intense training or something. not completely excluded
Edit: Wow, y'all. Almost a year later and I have learned a lot through these comments about the topic and humans as a whole. Some people in these comments are intelligent and we both have learned from each other while debating. But if your coming to be to basically spam "you're wrong!" "you're wrong!" over and over, I do not want to debate you and your unmovable presuppositions and deal with your cognitive dissonance.
@@supportsniper4626 But you're not in the military so you don't know what you're talking about.
@@alm4132 You just killed his carreee
@@alm4132 shit man that hit hard
@@supportsniper4626 You do realize that if military training women was any harder, they’d have to let every woman know that after their service they’ll be infertile. And no a woman can’t be as strong as a man, only if the effort is unequal. If you take a man and woman, have them train their hardest for the same amount of time, and the man will win.
Her voice changed and she got emotional when she mentioned "infertility". It definitely wasn't easy for her to go through it. Why would any woman want to push themselves to the brink of destruction?
Sometimes equality isn't the answer. Key differences make us who were are.
Agree🥲
She isn’t totally infertile. What happens is when women lose too much body fat, they become infertile during that time period.
Bottom line is this. Women know good and well they don’t want to take on the burden of a man. It’s all smoke and mirrors when females ask for equality. Females only want equality when it’s in an air conditioned building and they want the high paying jobs in those roles only.
This woman had to only go through a portion of what the men did and it broke her, so she knows first hand that women can’t physically compete with men.
Because usually the only ones who push "equality", are the ones who are NOT impacted by this.
No sane woman would do something like this to "prove" that women are equal to the men in terms of strength, mental strength etc..
"The worst form of inequality is to make unequal things equal"
- Aristotle
Did he actually say that? Man what a legend
@@Mrzoux1 I don't know if he did, nowadays people just quote stuff and put a known name under it
"People who quote stuff under my name are fucking weebs"
-Gandhi
@@Mrzoux1 I found it in a Pinterest page. It doesn't matter who said it. It has a deep meaning.
Aristotle was one of the greatest minds from all times but he was ok with slavery. Just sayin.
That’s an actual strong woman, she’s not lying to herself about what she can and can’t do.
Props to her for stating the facts
More smart than strong
Feminists’ll call her a white priviliged bigotted sexist.
@@loiclabonne5708
And she would kick their asses.
@@loiclabonne5708 those are neo -feminists.
Rare... A women who actually knows the differences...
I'd serve with her as my leader.
Me too
Simp
PS: I apologize. I shouldn't have used the word simp inappropriately. It was completely unnecessary and doesn't suit the context. My sincere apologies to any simps whom I may have offended.
Ahahah beta male ! She would laugh at that
@@Pantominas497 Man you are sad...
@@Pantominas497 my dude you are just a sad existence
This woman right here is a sigma female. She never lied about what her abilities is; Understands the limits; accepted the shortcomings of her gender; proceeds to continue to serves her country despite the hardships. Definitely she has an sigma mindset.
Yeah, she took on as much responsibility as she thought she could carry and had the humility to lay down the burden when it became too much for her - absolute respect, both for her dedication to herself and her people and her acknowledgement of her limits - many people are promoted to the point of incompetence and break down permanently, it takes a special kind of person to lay down their current duties and resume serving in a different capacity with grace. 100% respect.
stop saying sigma. that shit is stupid and is apart of non existent terminology.
@@youareaspook5897 amen. Glad to have people like her in the military. When the enemy roll up to your door, we need people with common sense and calm mindset
An actual women who thinks... Quite rare these days
Why you gotta put people in little boxes designed by stupid shrinks? People are far to amazing and complex for that.
It’s true, a woman wouldn’t be able to carry an injured man off of the battlefield like another man could, it’s not sexist, it’s safety for both sexes
Beautifully said sir. And quite poetic too😂
unless hes frail lol
@@capolean2902 then you shouldn't be in the military. standards should be the same for everyone.
Elix 89 if the standards are the same and everyone in the battlefield meets them shouldn’t a woman be able to carry a brother in arms to safety? Not trying to fight just saying
@@mercysimpson6066 the problem is that the standards arent the same tho. The physical tests for women are less challenging.
1: Open up the infantry to women
2: women don’t want to be in the infantry
3: review numbers after 12 months
4: see numbers are much lower than was hoped for.
5. Lower the fitness standards to try and pump up the numbers
6. Watch the unit slowly deteriorate due to lower quality soldiers passing through
7: numbers still are not high enough, blame the patriarchy and “toxic masculine culture” of the marines
Rinse and repeat.
Cameron Finch they don't want to be infantry, but they do want all the cool comm, medical, and officer jobs though
Fucking spot on. They want the ability to join, without actually joining. Fucking cancer.
Cameron Finch
Marxism wants to see women dying on the battlefield. It’s inherently evil.
Got in in one!
Gold.....
Face the reality, men and women are meant to coexist, not to be equal.
Drakonus equality of humanity, equality of opportunity, and equal measure of merit.
No boundaries but also no lowered standards.
I’m all good with a women who wants to destroy her body for her country but it’s gotta be at the same level as all that enter that role
@@cybertrk Giving female the same opportunity as male on things that they are obviously inferior to is the most direct way of wasting resources.
ruclips.net/video/sel1EL0P6Jg/видео.html
Equality in rights is important, but we are not physically the same.
What the fuck is wrong with you
The only people who think women should serve on the front line have never done it themselves.
That's not true. There are plenty of people who have served on the front lines that would wholeheartedly support women on the front lines.
Yes, that. The 'front line'. Why does nobody understand the concept? Women on front lines are rarer than serial killers. Most women are in logistics or medical positions in the military, where they don't have much of a use for that type of physical strength in the first place.
name some?@@breathej.4872
@breathej.4872 really? Did you take a survey? Cause I retired from the Marine infantry, and everyone I know calls BS on you.
@@breathej.4872No they don't support that bs idea
We did this on school once, the girls were very confident that they could beat boys in a wrestling competition because they took classes. The boys didn’t go hard on them and 1 boy lost because he was going easy, the girl started yelling that he was nothing and she could beat him all day. The boy asked a rematch to our PE teacher and yeah..... she cried and ran away because he bodyslammed her and had her in a choke hold:-)
@Shams Asadul Islam they lie to themselves to avoid the truth, that confidence is fake
Arkx123 our teacher wasn’t a pro in wrestling, he just said " when the person taps you let go "
Arkx123 last year we were a all boys class and we had the same teacher, same rules but we could take a hit and still laugh about it. And yeah this year there’s girls and we gotta take it easier
@@Art-mz4su i mean opvviosuly he would have stopped them if one was gonna get serious hurt. i hope...
I had to read this twice xDDDD
When I went through Marine Corps bootcamp, the disparity in training was a joke. Men did standard push-ups, women on their knees. Men did pull-ups, women hung from the bar for a few seconds. Women skipped upper body intensive portions of the obstacle course. When we shot the rifle, they didn't even bother going to the 500-yard line. Excuse me? When you have that type of disparity in training requirements (and outright skipping obstacles), what does that tell you?
You can force-feed all the feminism and equality you want down a society's collective throat, but on the battlefield reality prevails. Ask a woman to carry her gear plus a 225 lb. man off the battlefield for medical treatment and you are guaranteed not one dead Marine, but two.
thats cuz americans treat women like princesses and breed princesses .. all other countries that have them tell them ... do as the guys do or get out ... if they cant cut it they cant cut it .. weeds out the princesses like this disgrace of a marine capt
Same thing in the Israeli's much publicized foray into co-ed frontline military.
Despite significantly lowering standards for females, 46% of them are too injured from training at any given time to be operational.
IN ECUADOR, WHERE THE 21 CENTURY SOCIALISTS NEARLY DESTROYED THE COUNTRY AND THE ARMED FORCES IN TEN YEARS OF CORRUPTION, IT IS INCREDIBLY UNFAIR. FEMALE SOLDIERS OF ANY RANK ARE USUALLY TREATED LIKE QUEENS, THEY ARE "SOLDIERS" OR "WOMEN" ACCORDING TO THE SITUATION, THEY USUALLY DO NOT MEET ENTRY STANDARDS, SUCH AS HEIGHT AND FITNESS, AND ONCE OFFICERS, ALMOST ALWAYS FATTEN UP, FAIL PHYSICAL TESTS, AVOID JOBS AND MILITARY RESPONSABILITIES THAT IMPLY RISK LEAVING THEM TO MEN, BUT ARE ALWAYS READY FOR TRIPS ABROAD, THEY PROTECT AND COVER UP THEIR FEMALE BUDDIES, AND IF YOU WANT TO DISCIPLINE THEM, THEY WILL REPORT YOU FOR SEXUAL HARASSMENT.
I just remember getting yelled at from behind by a female DI and saying aye sir!! and she said do I look like a man recruit whoops sorry sirmaam maam.
yes sir
If a female soldier gets captured, the public and fellow soldiers would value her life more than if a male soldier got captured which is fucked up.
metallicak5 female privilege... tsk
not to mention she would be raped and violated in ways that only a woman would be violated. just look at what happened to the russian women during ww2
Clayton Sage you don't think the enemy likes that man butt lol
metallicak5 There's a reason why! it's because she's valued more, and that she's weak cute and vulnerable, her special treatments are based on the fact she's a woman. The public eye looks at the men as he can take care of himself even if he's captured and near death, nobody would be in such distress to get him. We see examples of this with battered woman they get shelters and government funding to take care of them with all these problems they face, We sure don't see these programs existing for battered men under such distress as civilians! so that's how unfair it is for men. men get nothing no help when combatted with such bullshit!.
Maybe I mixed up the nation, or I'm thinking of WW1, but I've heard stories and seen pictures of dead female soldiers who were brutally raped until dead, stabbed in the vagina, etc.
i can feel the sadness in her voice when she mentioned infertility :( godbless her . hope she' has/had the bestlife . a true hero and a true feminist
Feminist my ass. She's just a focused individual who's seen some shit. No ideology propagation there
Humanist I'd say
yeah I noticed that too.
notice how feminist women dont care about the potential for infertility
@@usernameluis305 the anchor didn't seem to blink at that. Best case scenario she though a "Sorry to hear that." would come of wrong, somehow. Worst case scenario she though nothing of importance was lost. Either way, I myself was very sorry to hear that.
The military and police should not be social experiments in equality just to make people feel good. Forced diversity leads to weakness.
E M Military and police shouldn't be spoken of together as if somehow they are the same. American government is about checks and balances, and separation of powers is one of those checks. For example, a rogue city police force would ultimately be checked and countered by the military. The police shouldn't be acting and equipping themselves as if they are somehow military, nor should they ever be allowed to train with the military. As a career military veteran I find the militarization of police in America disgusting and dangerous.
E M as I said before it there are plenty of women officers that can handle themselves I know plenty of them I know plenty of EMTs that can handle themselves I'm going to school to be a CNA there are plenty of nurses that can handle stuff that are women military is a different thing but here's the thing she's braver than I am when it comes to wanting to serve my country there is a reason that the police have pepper spray they have clubs they have guns to protect themselves
Holly Gillian - What? You're talking specifically about women, I'm talking about lowering standards overall to appease some sense of equality. Good for anyone who can make the grade, but standards should never be lowered to accommodate more of any group.
Holly Gillison that's a lie. Because femenest themselfs are trying to get special treatment and lobying to make the test easier for women. But whatever makes you feel warm and fuzzy inside.
Nedal Salman when I said officers I meant police but I'm saying women can handle a lot lot of different things different jobs I'm thinking this woman for her service
Damn she mentioned she became infertile without blinking an eye. That took some guts
that`s the consequences of feminism. sigh.
yeah, i genuinely get sad when she mention that..
Its like a dude saying he cant get hard anymore without blinking
and now she's trying to warn other women so they don't have to experience what she did, hats off to her
@Saturn not as rare as you might think, a large amount of Olympians who are in a strenuous physical field end up with hormonal and reproductive issues in the long term
I served with her when she was a company commander at OCS and she is the real deal.
i would bet on it that she is tough as nails this lady
Thanks for your service
And I’m sure she is all Corps
@@lifeinlimbo2186 god is a lie.
@@SupaSillyThyme Let people believe what they want to, I don't think they're harming anybody.
She isn’t strong because of the military. She’s strong because she’s honest.
She's honest because she's honest. Women should abandon the "strong, independent powerful" nonsense because it makes them less feminine. Women are not supposed to be hard, they are supposed to be soft. Women are not supposed to be bullheaded, loud or forceful. They're supposed to be demure. In case you are one of the many people who have forgotten what a woman is, search for videos on "how to be feminine" and "how to be ladylike"
She's not strong. You're just a simp.
first woman I have ever heard say the truth proud of this woman
And a pretty one too
To bad she didn't put any points into charisma.
At no point did she say women are physically inferior to men. She also did not say women should not be allowed into the infantry. The title of this video is complete click-bait bullshit
The truth about this about this subject
Stefan Els, that doesn't make it false thought
"Doing a portion of what my army brothers did made me infertile, that's why i don't support this"
"Yeah, but why not?"
Modern feminism in a nutshell
NWO in a nutshell...all these females here for it. I'm not
@@missmargmillionaire6421 nwo? Ummm...What does that mean?
@@No_you_dont_grandma bew world order
I think she was just provoking her to outright say that men are better suited for the position for the headline. She's a reporter so I don't doubt that she's just looking for a soundbite, especially with the hypocrisy of the entire situation.
How did she become infertile though? I don't get that part
It’s crazy how someone with common sense is looked at sideways by society
It's crazier how misogynistic men are looked at as “normal” by society.
@@breathej.4872 pretty sure men who hate who hate woman are not looked at normal😂 I think the word your looking for is incel and they are not looked at as normal by any means
@@breathej.4872 what world are you living in
@@breathej.4872 even more crazier women are allowed to be sexist against men and gets positive reinforcements if they treat men like crap
@@bagelbro8405 Mmkay. Whatever.
I was a third generation military person who served eight years in the army. I can honestly say it was a bad idea to let women into front line roles. It’s bad enough to fight the enemy, but to have to carry someone who couldn’t carry you if you get injured makes it worse. I was in training situations where the women assigned with us couldn’t carry the camouflage netting. They would complain that it was too hard. These same women would get pregnant just to get out of the military.
What you said is so true and seemingly obvious, it makes me wonder if the people who are pushing for this have ever seen combat...it just doesn't make sense.
Saw that myself a lot got pregnant in order to get out of the military. Hell I am talking about bootcamp.
Lies again? Marks & Spencer
my questions our where and who would put a baby in a us soldiers belly in the midst of a warzone XD
Women like these should be stripped off naked and torture them and kill them.
If a man said this, he would be dismissed as a sexist and ostracized. Good on her though. Rational person speaking out.
i'd say put the SJWs and Feminazis on the frontline first. See if they actually feel empowered by that.
Flying Tanker That’s the thing about the military generally. We actually have common sense and the common sense that speaking the truth is right, regardless of the liberals sticking out their bottom lips, throwing a tantrum and crying (whatever it is they cry! Sexism, misogyny, bigotry, gender or identity politics etc etc) Facts are more important than feelings but the liberal left think feelings are more important than facts, logic or common sense.
using false data and follow on troops experience ... she is so full of shit her eyes will turn brown any moment ... I have served with women and they are invaluable assets in the thick of it ... they increase effectiveness of troops just by being there ...and add a new view on tactical situations making for a broader set of choices to do what must be done ... they are definately any man's equal in the field.
She speaks from experience. That's what I love about the Defence Forces, it can turn anybody into a logical and rational person given enough time.
@@0623kaboom lol
It's funny that the women who has actually weathered the storm is saying that women to join infantry is not the best idea, while the anchor who has barely stepped out of her air-conditioned studio is pushing really hard for it.
Thanks friends. Never got so many likes.
Now you see who is really pushing this nonsense.
This!
Good point.
She isn't necessarily pushing FOR it, it seems like she's mainly trying to get her to explain why she feels the way she does, so that people watching will know.
Dude come on, it’s Fox News. You clearly know where they stand with this and the way the interview is being done is to allow the guest to make their point. Really don’t know what you’re on about, this interview is set up to be in the favor of the guest.
There should be one fitness standard, ONE! Regardless of gender, if you can't make it, then your not a marine, end of fucking story.
***** ... why do we need the same percentage of gender pass any standard?
Well I don't think a presidential fitness plan is the same thing as military service. It is fine to have sexed standards for say being healthy, or a men and women's league sports time, but it is another thing to have two standard for how well you can kill or be killed.
Lets say we have an engineering competition something like "build a rocket" the fastest highest flying rocket wins, the gender ratio is irrelevant and will probably skew male as fewer women are going to give a fuck about rockets. In your example of national fitness or sports there is no external judgment, anyone can set up any rules for victory, but when there is external judgment, when you can't set the rules for victory, then all that matters is who ever has got the best ability. So lets say you need people that can drag other people out of a firefight, haul all their equipment by foot while shooting at people, you need people that can kill and not die, you can't create a different standard for men and women, unless the enemy is going to treat the women better!
A universal military fitness standard would simply determine your role in war, from army base cook to special forces marine. There would be plenty of military roles that women would be fine at in even gender ratios, some even in combat, military pilots for example, women are usually smaller, lighter, have shorter heart to brain distance. Look at the air force, their biggest test is how many Gs you can take, that is it. Centrifugal force does not give you special credit because of your genitals.
+frbe0101 Give women easier condition. Thats fair, o wait. What about transgender for that matter? Heard of transmen approved in female sport. I think its gonna turn into transport hohohoho
San dro It is only a matter of time before some man who failed the male fitness standards for the military demands to be counted under the female standards as a transsexual. It will be like Carlynn Jenner being declared women of the year X1000. That is if the trans-loophole is made sooner of later lots of men are going to use it, it become an obvious and shameful farce.
+Mary Ellin What do you do if a commander give you an order for 10 km(or 10 mile) walk, then assault. Then run 1 km(1 mile) then make a patrol. It is the time you need physical strength. Having double standart do not create double field to fight. A person needed to fit field standart.
Its always the one who comfortably sits in an airconditioned room talks the most and wants to push for something.
You don't put healer as main dps, cmon man.
XDDDD
FlyingBiscuit exactly LMFAO
FlyingBiscuit I couldn’t have said it better
FlyingBiscuit bruhhh
Lmfao!!!!! Best comment ever!!!!
In my eyes, women should only be allowed in combat roles if they can complete the same physical tests that men must complete.
3 marine women have been admitted to the infantry battalion in North Carolina
www.marinecorpstimes.com/articles/women-join-infantry
milan thak Thank gd that general mattis will shut this social experiment down.
Tylor Lilly I'm not saying the zero has ever made it, matter of fact I would doubt that. On the other side of the coin, everything I've looked into they to gut the program in order for anyone to make, its all politics.
Tylor Lilly They did that for army infantry, I forget the time but for months zero woman passed the training will make standards. they crippled the program and even still more than half failed.
I agree, the same goes for police work, fire fighters, and EMTs.
I don't get why feminists are pushing towards "equality" by demanding that women do what guys do! What's this obsession with doing things that men do?! They hate men, yet they want to be like men! Can't they just embrace and focus on the things that women are naturally better at?! It's like "Oh look, that guy is doing that thing which I think is cool, I must show that I can do it too otherwise he's being a misogynist!" but apparently the things that women do best are no longer cool for them, for some bizarre reason! :/ Feminists are like guys trapped in women's bodies who want to be guys but have all the privileges of being a woman! It's mental!
Spetsop because they want men to be obsolete. they're already working on ways for females to be impregnated by other females/themselves.
m.slashdot.org/story/96820
JGSH13 Whatever. You are Insane, it isn't to make the Male of the species obsolete; we are not black widow spiders. and it would be impossible. tighten the top of you're tin-hat
Ryan Newby whatever you say, bub.
JGSH13 well really, come on; this is what the comment section is for, debate - enlighten me. How would it even be possible, for the Female of our species to dominate the Males? Look at the specs? The Alien creators made that shit impossible. We are supposed to live in harmony, too bad their is so much control in this time, it makes fragile People unstable. God damn Gov. Media and dichotomizing by Race and Status!
*Everyone. Is losing. They're shit*
Rain TheNiloticGirl You are obviously ignorant. We all know there are weak men and strong girls. But Biologically and logistically Men tend to be bigger and stronger. Don't make sweeping statements.
I have so much respect for this women for speaking the truth. She is a real woman who does not shy away from accepting the reality of this world.
“It’s a male dominated field”
Well so is the body bags! 😤
Facts
True 🥺
So is the body of a female!
more purchased likes. this entire comment section is gamed by the military itself. lol. pathetic.
more purchased likes. this entire comment section is gamed by the military itself. lol. pathetic.
This whole topic has nothing to do with sexism, it's simply about who's best for the job
Dats still sexism.. it's obviously a man so y do dey still debate on it?
What's obviously a man? Anyway I don't think most women think it's sexist other than those crazy feminists. There are things that guy and girls excel differently in and guys are naturally way stronger and more dominant than girls. There are exceptions but feminist try to pretend there are no differences. Sometimes from person to person there is not much difference, but that doesn't mean that girls and guys are not different generally
@@Backup439 Because they think women and men are equal in every single way
@@beach2550 I would let a woman in she can meet the same requirements as a man
@@eliasmagus5086 it's more than just physicality, the mere presence of a woman causes issues socially in the ranks, soldiers will be soldiers and such...
She sees what people refuse to see: men and women are made DIFFERENTLY. Why can't people see that. Men do some things better than women, and women do some things better than men.
ya women can have kids.........
apart of there anger is "Men can phsyically do things women cant" and then "Men choose not to do things women excel at"
Its the very principal that men mostly feel "I can do everything better than you, other than the physical act of giving birth" from architecture to clothes design, to math and physics. I remember my auncle told me in 10th grade back in the mid 80s his highschool gym teacher stood him up in front of his class (6ft male 210lbs) that he was stronger and faster then 99% of all women who have ever lived (he was a pretty good track and field).
the term they used to use back in the 80-70-60s was penis envy, women simply feeling they got the short end of the stick in the gender lottery. that has been subverted now into feminism the want for men to be viewed as equal to men in all areas in society.
Feminism back then was women simply wanting to have the same governing rights and access, Feminism now is women saying "well im not exactly able to succeed with only the same access so you need to change the barrier for entry AND make laws for me only to garauntee i succeed".
I thnk every man today would be a 60s feminist "yeah let them vote, yeah let them get a bank loan, yeah let them run for office" I dont think we have an issue with that anymore new feminism though is an entirely different beast based off inequality
Still a bunch of nonsense
Wrong but ok
You dont prove shit with your one sentence comments. All you do is emphasize on the lack of ability to bring up actual facts to back up your "wrong but ok" bullshit.
Reminds of an Indian commander who ended the debate with a simple question " Can you piss, take a shit and change your sanitary Napkin in front of me and the rest of the unit? "
I fine with them being in the military, but the standards should NEVER go down.
i am female and if i were military i would put myself to set the goals that the men have so i wouldn't f'n die. some woman can actually be as strong as the men but some just stay at their lower standards,
i think they should have same requirements if anything, and woman should do more intense training or something. not completely excluded, tho.
Yes
If anything, if they are “inferior to men” and they get recruited, wouldn’t that feel so much better? You did the same training as someone better than you, and you may have gotten recruited, you beat all odds and made it!
If a woman would do the same thing as a man she would still be weaker, that's how nature works. The army doesn't need gender equality, it needs strength.
@@damianpicalau6642 The average man is stronger then the average girl, but if a girl trains, she could be as strong as the average man, it would just be harder.
I work underground in a mine setting up ground support, for every 15 split set bolts i carry, my female counterpart carrys 3. For every 2 mesh sheets i carry she carrys 0 because she cant even lift one. The kicker is i spent 1 year as a contractor to get signed on to a permanent role, and she got signed straight on with 10k a year more pay. We are all equal, some are just more equal then others...
pussy pass, thats all that was.....
Lucas Rudd You need to file a suit against your employer then.
Mate i work for BHP
@@anthonyperkins5856 yup, quotas that let whamen slip in ahead of actually qualified men for the same/better job.
It's all a bullshit joke and I get sick of seeing it in businesses around me.
bro isnt this a gender gap wtf
My mom was a marine for almost 11 years and switched as a Staff Sergeant to become a Navy Nurse and is now an O-6 after 34 years of service. She says the exact same thing.
Hmm... did she give birth to you during or before her service time in the USMC, pray tell?
@@Briselance She gave birth to me well after her time in the marines. She was in the nurse corps for about 2 years before she had my older sister and 4 years before she had me.
The people who serve know the difference, it’s the ones who sit behind a desk and write articles for stupid magazines that think they can fight a marine and win with ease.
gotta give moms a virtual high five...
She didn't mention to that Women don't do so well out in the field for weeks, sometimes months without showering. It's a fact Men are more built for this and even they struggle. These feminist must hate feminine energy.
Mad respect for this woman. She isnt delusional, and has a pov from an actually educated position. Salute!
When she casually says it made her infertile, a little piece of my heart broke
Feminist should go to the army to get infetile
@King of Kings he couldn't have said it any simpler fam🤦♂️
Its kinda poetic when you look at it. Feminist would give up their ability to make babies (the function that defines womanhood) just to be like men...Its like they're literally turning to men, smh😪.. btw im not calling her a feminist.
@King of Kings hes saying she has a bigger set than you do lmfao
Daniel Bell She underwent the same training as the men and that lead to a lotta problems including extreme weight loss, muscle atrophy, and infertility. This is only a portion of the training regiment but caused immense stress to her body. She literally wasn’t built for it.
Im in the army, and i find it despicable that now our pt standard has dropped to allow women to pass and not feel left out. Were trading national security for feelings.
Don't worry, with the way things are going, I feel like there's gonna be a wake-up call soon, and things like the military, masculinity, and feminism will go back to the way it was a hundred years ago.
@Donald Duck they are communist want to destroy liberty and what defends liberty.
Red Dot I know 😡
Trust me, all that willy nilly is out the window once the next major war starts
@@latenightthinker4737 which is becoming inevitable as each day passes.
I am a soldier in the austrian special forces the "Jagdkommando", we had several women (dozens) try to pass the entrance examination and not one was able to. There is a reason training in the military is so rigorous and standard is so high, because in combat that can mean the difference between life and death.
If they pass the entrance exam, by all means, let them join, but there has to be ONE STANDARD for everybody.
Exactly! Don't make a different physical requirement, make it equal, if you pass, you're in! No need to make it unequal.
Let's be clear, you are talking about fitness requirements for a special forces unit, correct? I agree that no one should be in the special forces who cannot pass the standardized testing and training. I am Canadian Armed Forces and to my knowledge there are no women working as assaulters in JTF2 (even if there were we wouldn't know about it because their identities are suppressed for obvious reasons).
Canadians have allowed women into all positions since 1989 which means we have female infanteers and combat arms soldiers. They are the gross minority of combat arms because most women choose other trades. To be fair most men choose other trades though as the combat arms do not make up the majority of soldiers, sailors and airmen. The women I have met who are combat arms are fit and tough. I know lots of men who have worked with them and they have expressed no issues so long as they can keep up; this sentiment applies to men as well. If you can physically hack the combat arms they will force you to change trades regardless of your gender.
The Canadian fitness standard called the FORCE test and the Battle Fitness Test are not prorated for gender or age which means every person in the the CAF must pass the same fitness test, period. There are incentive levels for the FORCE test now which account for age and gender but the minimum standard is the same for everyone. Beyond that all unit PT is done together and there is not a male/female version of PT. If we go on a march everyone carries the same weight, everyone goes the same distance and everyone has to finish by the same time. This also applies to runs and bodyweight training. There is more of an issue with certain trades being less fit than actual gender issues.
There are additional physical standards based on specific occupations such as paratrooper, Search and Rescue Techs, Special Operations Forces, divers, Fire Fighters, flight crew and so on. These standards are also gender neutral which means any women in these positions have met that standard. I would take a fit women over an unfit man any day and that seems to be the sentiment with my male colleagues.
There are women who are unfit for combat roles, but we must bear in mind there are lots of men who are unfit for those jobs too. Making a blanket statement that every woman is unfit does not bear out when the opportunities are made available.
Yes, in my case I am talking about fitness requirements for a special forces unit and as I said, if women pass the entrance exam, they should be allowed in. I am NOT suggesting NO WOMEN period.
What I am saying, is that lowering standards for women just so they can "get in", could be really dangerous and potentially cost lives.
ridddix I agree 100% that standards, be they fitness testing or training rigors should not be changed to accommodate for gender or age, particularly in the case of special forces.
I'm not sure why I gave you such a long reply before. I think I was just verbosely pointing out that single standards are being implemented in Canada and they are working.
there is no "IF" it will 100% without a doubt this would become the root cause of unnecessary deaths of otherwise able body men, an alpha male's Achilles heel is the ingrained biological compulsion is to be the protector of the weak and that is what will get him killed when Jane can't cope any longer and he has to take his focus off the fighting and surviving to carry her ass.
Really does make a difference, a woman who's been out in the fields and know her limits, and a woman sitting comfortably in an air-conditioned room
Can we just stop with the charade that feminism wants equality and start admitting that they want preferential treatment?
d Lo
Exactly!
d Lo Preach!
3rd wave feminism yes that seems to be true, but back when it started it was a very necessary push for American culture.
mar504 can’t agree more...
Third wave feminism was necessary, unfortunately today’s “post third wave/fourth wave” feminism is so fucking dumb man, I’ve never seen so many hypocritical, manipulative , sluts , gold digging trashy ass women now called feminists in one single group, and the worst part is some men are so fucking taught to “treat the ladies right” when they’re literally getting fucked over so bad man
d Lo so true
She cannot have Children of her own, as a Dad this breaks my heart, I would be crushed if my daughter could not.
couldnt agree more its easier for a male.to be told that he cant father a child then it is to tell a female.that she cant have babies. i know cause i have been trough it my wife is still running on all cylinders and im misfiring. yes i would like to have a nother child but that aint happening.but i could imagine what my wife would go throu if they told her she wasnt working properly
@Judihatemmoharram Judihatemmoharram yo-you didn’t make a point tho like what r even saying
@Judihatemmoharram Judihatemmoharram well for most women having a child is one of the most important things in their life.
Why are people so upset about this tho it's not a big deal
@Judihatemmoharram Judihatemmoharram which is?
Equal rights has no place in a warzone!
ag.onewheel XR in future wars it will if we just bow down to SJW
stfu
Sebastian Mark the west will. Not us.
🤔 well actually it does, the bullet/bomb will kill whoever equally!
I think it's better said feminism has no place in the war zone.
I'm all for equal rights,but when I put a women driving my humvee I know for a fact we gone hit a mine and shell go "oops"
As a former combat engineer officer, I 💯 agree with this! Doesn’t benefit the individual nor the institution 🤦🏾.
🎯❤🤯
These poor girls who are being recruited into the Infantry. God Help us if we end up in another War. These Girls are being set up to Die.
As a 18 year old MARINE in Vietnam I didn't get to "try it out on the front line" I was there and that was it
Amen to that. As an Army Brat and someone who loves this America, Thank you for doing your duty and not running off to Canada, sir.
o7
thank you for everything you did good sir
Thanks for your service. Not the same war, but your brothers helped my family in Korea survive and make it to America. You and your fellow servicemen deserve unending honor.
They may not have liked that years ago, but I respect you for your service, I want to be a tank operator.
I spent 23 years on urban fire dept and have worked with women both as a medic and fire fighter. They try not to put two females on same medic unit because to often they need to call for a lift assist which now puts another fire engine or medic out of service. And the top 10% of female fire fighters perform at a level worse then the worst 10% of the male firefighters consistently for all 23 years I was there. It just go's to show how much less qualified the other 90% of the women are. I also spent 6 years as an infantryman in the Army and the biggest concern if females fought in combat is if a sargeant has to order someone to charge a machine gun nest, and its between a man or women because no one else is available, does he order the man to do it because we are subconsciously protective of women or he orders the man to do it because he has a better chance of completing the task. Either way its not fair to the man.
Are their differences in how a enemy treats a soldier if an infantryman is captured vs a woman that is captured?
@@moabman6803 yes if that enemy is Arab she will be raped, without a doubt.
@@tinaswain8537 I agree with you, I had a female partner for a while and I usually handled most of the physical stuff while she utilized her talent for empethizing with troubled people and understanding their emotions.
Tina Swain yea no, you dont hear men wanting to get kicked in the nuts over and over. You on the other hand have no problem saying you want another kid. Men = higher pain tolerance :). Or ginger females as proved by mythbusters
@Copperhead Sutton at my dept everyone had to take turns doing every job, there were no set jobs like just being truck driver/operator. I knew a few women who had the heart of a champion but the strength of a teenage boy. I felt bad that they had to struggle to prove themselves all the time.
I want equal rights for men and women. That means same pay, respect, and equal rights. But ladies, if the boat is sinking, don't expect me to give up my seat on the life raft. After all, we are equals.
Mr. Glabalabadubeestu The Mexican Cyclops more women than men die if shinking ships anyways www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2128812/Women-children-Sadly-quite-chivalrous-real-life--twice-men-survive-sinking-ships.html
Fanny Lindfors I smell some bs and contradictions there.
Also do you think an article is credible? No, it's not. They can and will cherry pick information.
There are no Feminists in a HouseFire.
The only reason the women were given the lifeboat seats on the titanic was because the men didn't really believe the ship was going to sink. Women are usually more likely to die in a shipwreck, as they're pushed aside by the stronger men. Tired of seeing Titanic used as an excuse to shout bullshit. You know in a life or death situation most people are going to put their survival first. Gender doesn't matter in those situations.
JoshReflek bill burr material
“The Constitution only gives people the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself”- Thomas Jefferson. Women should have the right to join the military, but they need to be able to perform the necessary requirements to do so.
Remember when our differences were celebrated, and people would would find what worked best with those differences? Good times...
I remember as a child...
Underated comment 😌
@FirstNameSecondNameThirdNameLastName 😂
And now men and women fight eachother and point out the weaknesses.
Our differences are what makes us human. Now we are all trying to be like eachother or hating others for their differences which is cringe
Physically inferior.....Yep. More caring and nurturing.....yep. Men and woman are different, accept it.
They are, but war is the same and it cares little for female disadvantages on physical strength.
Nothing suggests that women are more caring.
Tigo625
Then we disagree unfortunately for you I have history on my side.
GUNSnSTUFF Eh, no, you don't.
Tigo625
Eh yes I do
On average the average male has around 19 times the testosterone that the average women has. It’s just the genetics that make a man more well suited for these jobs
i am female and if i were military i would put myself to set the goals that the men have so i wouldn't f'n die. some woman can actually be as strong as the men but some just stay at their lower standards,
i think they should have same requirements if anything, and woman should do more intense training or something. not completely excluded
@Assassin Clan no no, that's not what i said...
I said, some woman CAN be as strong as men (aka some have the ability to do the EXTRA workouts that are required to reach a man's standard to be in the military)
@@supportsniper4626 why do you type the same thing
@Assassin Clan I know that, but I said at least they need to fit the standards if they wanted to join, which I think would mean longer and harder trainings. So yea, I agree with your statement
Because for Generationd men are the ones doing work, going to war, farming, hunting and all other stuff. Meanwhile females are used to support the males so that they can keep on going
I served as a Cav Scout in an Infantry unit, and can honestly say that some women can do it. BUT, it should only be done if they are held to the same PT, training, etc standards. We're talking about lives being saved or lost here, not equality parades.
I am at 10th mountain. Most women here are smaller than most men. Nothing wrong with their character though. Most of them couldn't make it through ACFT.
You're damn right if the building is on fire I'm not gonna complain about a woman carrying me out of the building... but I've seen women in incredible shape struggle to carry the hose up 10 flights...I'd rather you tell me the most intelligent way to get there and the mindless grunt make the climb. :) I hope that came out right! :)
@@juana2631 ACFT is a joke! The minimum is easy, and a lot of people are still not passing.
I do think there should be more battlebuddy carry or higher weight drag to simulate carrying a person, but then that would cost a lot of injuries and high medical expenses. AND, people still won't pass anyways! They will retire in 20 years with walking profile. Thanks for holding up standards! Good luck US military!
Holding women to the standards of men. Yeah, that's a great idea. And you wonder why we have all these Caytlen Jenners nowadays.
@@salazam yea, it is smart. Holding everyone to the same standards in training keeps weirdos like you off the battlefield. You'd probably get your stupidity caught on a trip wire.
You know why a woman is good in war? Because she can bleed for 5 days and don't die.
sure =_=
+IBroLLyI ISephirothI Yep, it's perfect skill against enemy dogs )
Authent12 xD
Menstruation? I thought it was one day a month.
I’m glad I ain’t a woman. That’s harsh
😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂
"will they get to choose" ...this is the army you do as told !
Woman: "Papa, Charlie, Bravo we have a problem!"
Man: "Here is the commandant speaking, what is the problem?"
Woman: "Nevermind"
Man: "Please explain"
Woman: "You should know that!"
Po 😂😂
lol
Lmao
Why is this how some women talk, like men or even your friends can’t read your mind sis
😂😂😂😂😂
There will always be exceptions to the rule, but women are simply built differently. That’s not sexism, that’s simply the truth.
What I'd like to see are those screaming colorful short haired feminists on the front lines. At least then we wouldn't care about casualties.
They would be great as point women
They're layers of fat in their mid section would be quite useful as they serve their primary purpose Human Shields
They'd be great decoys
Operate Human SHIELD is a go. Tell them that they enemy is chauvinist pigs that support Trump and you won’t have enough transport to get them out there.
Send in the suicide grunts
This is proof that true strong independent women don't need to tell everyone they're strong and independent, they simply are.
I'm an American. I'm a male. I want to get pregnant. It's my right as an American to do so. Now, go spend a billion dollars in research so you can find 1% of us who may be capable of doing so. Hurry, my feelings are hurt. Run along, and can I be on the news while you're at it. I'm courageous.
excellent!
Thanks, man.
Well, it's like this, man. A VERY SMALL percentage of women want this position in combat arms. Of that percentage an astounding few, and I'm talking a shockingly small amount, will have what it takes to make it without lowering standards etc. So, America believes we should absolutely accommodate them by dropping millions of dollars in to surveys, studies, new bathroom facilities, more barracks and a slew of other issues I would have to think about. All this for literally 10 -15 women. And more than likely, burnout will hit and they will move on to another job set, and others, new ones that possibly will not follow in there steps because they will figure out what we have known. Infantry sucks. So, rather than say hey, this is how it is, we bend over backward to fulfill anyone's whim and fancy. So, I think America should pay for me to get pregnant, no matter the absurdity of it. Now, I'm not a woman hater. Love them, I personally oversaw the insertion of the FET team in Afghanistan (female engagement team) and those ladies did well at that job. But not everyone deserves a participation trophy, man. I just retired after 20 yrs in the Corps, and there is so much more to it than just saying OK give it a try.
I think the blind and those in wheelchairs should also have a chance to serve.
Being blind should not prevent someone from being a fighter pilot or a forward observer in the artillery.I look forward to whole battalions of Marine infantry made up of quadriplegics and women. Also why should tourettes sydrome bar someone from being an air traffic controller at an airport or on a carrier. We must be fair and provide equality opportunity.
Mark Twain Hey, Samuel Clemens, beautiful post, man. While we're at it, midgets should be afforded game time in the NBA! What were we thinking? We need to accommodate all desires in this country.
these days people throw around "respect" this and that like its meaningless respect is earned
and her honesty has earned a bit of respect from me
Just a “bit”? Dude, she's a damn Marines officer. If that's what it takes for you to respect someone a “bit”, you must hardly respect anyone.
There should be all female infantry battalions. Send them in first. Then while the enemy is incapacitated with hysterical laughter, the male infantry will come in and wipe out the enemy.
Had a political science professor back in the first Gulf War say something similar. If they win the battle, we can say you got beat by a bunch of women. If they lose, you beat a bunch of women. Its a win-win situation for us.
N Ex dude I am so weak 😂
sounds like a good tactic and diversion!
dude don't make that joke in front of a feminist. she'll explode.. literally
Imagine if a man said this...
Lets be glad a women did. But most likely itll be ignored
@@DhirC35 And if I use this as a piece of evidence the feminists will say she was brain washed by the patriarchy
@@eliasmagus5086 even tho its really just their own gender but with a brain
It's honestly better a woman said this, as they can better speak from personal experience.
@@CrapZackGames yes sir. Plus women cant pull the man card on a woman
The only women strong enough for the Infantry are Bodybuilders and Professional Athletes. But they already have Better Paying Jobs than the Military.
Some girls are naturally really bulky and some guys are pretty weak. I think they should just have a standard for phsycial fitness or training and not to lower the bar for girls. People should just do what they are best suited for
They also have extremely specific diets, supplements, and or drugs which cost hella money
@@beach2550 "bulky" doesn't mean strong, it means heavier.
@@albertomoreno9795 bulkier also doesn't mean heavier by fat content. So I can use heavier to talk about strength if I want to
@@beach2550 yet the strongest female couldn't even best the average man yeah id still doubt she can carry one big ass 6"3 Man take your feelings aside mate.
Standards were lowered to let women in fire and police departments. This put the public at risk.
I think the best solution for this is to put a serious physical test. If you pass it you can join in the frontline and if you don't you cant.
Without looking at your gender
Branch PT tests don’t equal the stress or strength it takes on a battlefield or even in an infantry unit
And when barely any women pass it, someone is going to scream that it's sexist and demand that the bar be lowered so more women can pass, as though the bar was deliberately set high for the express purpose of excluding women.
@@Dan_Brandybuck in this situation, the government should take complete control over the media and teach people that war isnt a joke and if women want equal rights they have to go through equal trainings, and they should remind people that there are men how didnt pass the test as well
ALI NABEEL woah woah there man government taking control of media seems a bit dictatorial but I do agree war isn’t a social experiment and it’s not a college campus there’s studies that prove that women in combat jobs don’t work.
i am female and if i were military i would put myself to set the goals that the men have so i wouldn't f'n die. some woman can actually be as strong as the men but some just stay at their lower standards,
i think they should have same requirements if anything, and woman should do more intense training or something. not completely excluded, tho.
Taste of reality. Ask a women "What can a woman do that I man cannot" THEN ask "What can a man do that a woman cannot" The answers to those two questions solves the problem. NO OFFENSE TO WOMEN. Men and women are "Different". Do not equate that with "Inferior". If you do get offended get a grip on reality.
I'm a genius I know.
I guess I'm a genius too, because I agree with you :)
@@seashell8913 nah you're the lab assistant
Buceta só, mulher só sabe fazer isso e pedir ajuda.
Totally agree.
Yeah. I’m a woman and yeah I’m better at so many things then my male friends but they are better then me at so many other things. We are biologically different.
The argument ends at 'there is more cost than benefit.' This is war, not feel good play time.
What an honest down to earth individual she is, absolute Credit to Her!
I remember in basic there was this little guy, five two maybe a buck thirty - anyways the drill staff thought it would be funny to pair him up with the 6'4" bodybuilder who was about two fifty. The little guy earned the nickname of the 'ant' because an ant can lift up to fifty times its body weight. He picked up this giant and slung him over his shoulder in a fireman carry and ran the 600 meter test. The big guys hands were dragging in the muck, but the Ant didn't slow down one bit.
I guess he was the original inspiration for Ant-Man.
And the ant was a man I'm guessing
You've been watching too many animes.
in the end of the day, hes till a man so.....
He never said that women could.
Anyone ever worked a job where half the people didn't want to be there or played on a sports team where half the team didn't care if they won as long as they played. It makes the whole team lose interest. If women aren't as physically or mentally tough they have no business in an organization that literally could mean the difference in our country existing or not.
wolfpack4128 Yeah, I play Overwatch every day.
wolfpack4128 then again you have to think of the women who really want it vs the women who just want to prove a point.
Even if you want something it doesn't mean you should get it, you must earn it.
Xcision Mist I want to play center for the Lakers. Too fucking bad I'm 5"11.
I admire her honesty. Respect.
Bless this woman for living in reality.
The Russian's had it sorted in WWII. Chick's played vitally important back up supply, and medical roles. Occasionally, they were called up into combat to make up the numbers in pretty much all fields and areas of conflict on the Eastern Front. Those who fought did themselves and their nation proud. My fave group are, "The Night Witches." Anyhow, the issue here though is Women were essentially reservist's and the Russians were fighting a defensive war when it was, "all hands to the pump." So to speak. Utilizing women for offensive/combat infantry operations on the ground over men, simply for the sake of pleasing a few idiots, is a fucking dumb move. History has proven capable Women have important roles to fulfill in the military, but throwing them in the front line unnecessarily is a waste of skill's better used elsewhere.
The closest women on the Eastern Front had to experience combat was in limited roles, mainly support roles. Women would be snipers, logistical supply runners, or they would help load and launch artillery batteries. There was not much else to it.
Women were some of the deadliest snipers during the war
You speak truth.
Russians only used them for propaganda. They basically said that if women can do it you can do it three times better
@@abdullahakhtar9824 propaganda sure but you gotta admit their achievements. They wouldn't become a propaganda tool if they didn't do anything impressive. Most of those females are snipers and bomber pilots which are basically support role which fits. Because they didn't need as much physical strength as the frontline infantry.
We really have to give credit to this officer, because if it was a guy saying this stuff, he would be screwed
i am female and if i were military i would put myself to set the goals that the men have so i wouldn't f'n die. some woman can actually be as strong as the men but some just stay at their lower standards,
i think they should have same requirements if anything, and woman should do more intense training or something. not completely excluded
I mean, genders can't be reversed here. It has to be a female reciting her experience as a female and how difficult it was. It's more a credible source than a man would say.
Well a he wouldn't be talking about his menstruation stopping, would he ?
Infertlity is often a side effect for women athletes. It is a temporary condition.
As soon as female professional Athletes can beat the male Athletes in the same sport against each other then go ahead and join any combat MOS you like.
There is a reason as to why even in fucking sports females do not play against males, but yet here we are discussion if a Male Infantry soldier should put his hands into a Female Infantry Soldier. Hint here, it has nothing to do with sexism and has alot to do with the physical abilities of both Genders.
Or whats all the schoolsport about? When boys have to throw nearly twice as far as girls to get the same fucking grade. Oh the boy finished 3 minutes faster then this girl here? Too bad, she gets an A and he gets a B.
But go ahead and lecture me about how females are perfectly fit to join a Combat MOS. And whilst we are at it, why not draft females into the military aswell?
I agree with you on the majority of what you stated, usually men do preform better in sports than women, with some exceptions. The first Man vs Woman boxing match that I have been able to find, the woman (Helen Hildreth) was winning the match, up until it was stopped by Fred Wenck, a boxing commissioner at the time. Each case is different, but sadly, it seems women do get it easier due to just being women. Sucks, but this is our modern society for you
+glprime2814 Nah to be honest women having it easier is a very primitive look at male-female relationships.
I mean, in animal instinct, it's the first notion we get that the females need to be protected... So it's not modern at all :P
If you take a female boxer and put her against a guy of equal skill...she will get murdered...absolutely murdered...the only time a female can compete against a man, is if she is extremely well trained and he isn't...did you happen to see the video, I forget her name...she is the greatest female boxer of all time...she got into muay tai...she went against a guy, that she outweighed and he was pretty much an amateur...he ko'd her in 1 round...knocked her out cold...took like 10 minutes for her to regain consciousness....this is why the olympic womens hockey team(the best females) practice with male high school kids...this is why, a male high school basket ball team could destroy the best WNBA team on the planet...easily....
In real war women would get slaughtered, men move much faster so are harder to hit
Since black widow, a women can fight toe to toe with aliens, other women can too. In Hollywood.
Women should be allowed in the military, but nursing the soldiers and cooking for them. Assisting them overall.
With other comfort duties as well.
*0* women out of *30* have passed men's infantry officer training. Truth be told, if I have to cover the front of a building and I have to trust a woman to keep the enemy from entering the back of the building and stabbing me in the back.... Let's just say there's no way in hell I'm getting any sleep that night. You can't have a someone who can be easily overpowered covering your 6. Enough of this nonsense. Even if one manages to make it through the training and ends up with her boots on the ground in a war zone, she's more a liability than an asset.
I remember taking the Presidential Physical Fitness tests in high school. Males had to do 20 pull ups (at least) and all women had to do was hang on the pull up bar for 20 seconds. I don't agree with all the commenters here, but on the topic of strength and endurance, there simply is no question that men do better than women.
Agreed, during a combat situation the team with a woman will be at a major disadvantage simply for the fact that all the men will unconsciously keep an eye on her. She will also be a liability physically-vise because women, even if they train hard, will always be weaker than men facing the same training (she could train a lot more to catch up, but then there's the risk she's gonna be more tired) and obviously getting her period in the middle of a fight can be a big problem too (be it her psychic abilities, need to change it down there every so often, or simple health risks involved). In case of a capture it's obvious what would happen to her (not like it didn't happen to men, but in far smaller numbers, with a woman it's pretty much a given it will happen and it's one of the reasons they were never allowed to wage war and why prostitutes earned good money wherever the military was stationed). Long story short, I'm all for women joining the military, but do the important jobs in the back (look at queen Elisabeth II.!) and leave the men on the frontlines, it'll be safer for both parties
That captain is the only one in the conversation that knows what she’s saying. Semper Fi Captain. Men and Women are different. We’re supposed to be. Regardless of what the liberals think.
Anyone with an IQ > 25 knows this. Why is it news?
It's not news. The news they should be reporting is how political correctness is illogical and nonfactual.
Patrick EH unfortunately at least 60% of people's IQ are below 25
Nel's Wolf You should know that IQ is dependent on standard deviations on an interval of 10. This means that 68% of people fall between 90 and 110 IQ points. And 95% fall between 80 and 120. And so on.
Literally by the very design of the IQ score, it is impossible for your claim to be true.
(I get that you're just trying to hyperbolize, but it doesn't really work in this context)
Why can't you just follow along with the joke.
Joke's are supposed to be funny.
Thank you for your service, Captain. And especially for your honesty.
When I was a young Marine and went to NCO school in MCRD San Diego (1990), I had as one of my instructors a female Marine by the name of Sgt Tulley ( If my memory serves me correctly). She could out run, out hike ( hump for us Marines) and out shine most male Marines. I asked her one day about what she thought about women Marines in combat units and she simply said " hell no". Even though she could hold her own, she said she thought it was crazy to do that. I respected her for her candor.
NCO School is in Oceanside... Whats the details of your enlistment? Duty stations, rank, slang words only Marines use and shit like that.
i think its esasier to find woman who can endure, but in terms of strength, fireman carry. lift someone out of a fox hole ect. . its just not do abble.
Theres always someone better a man 😂
I used to believe (simplistically, I admit): "if they pass the same standards as men, sure, they are welcome". That's until I approached the Army and talked with many of its members who enlightened me about the psychological aspects of serving as a women, the pressure it generates, etc...
Don't get me wrong, I am sure there is a place for women in any army, in which capacity they can sometimes outshine the men. A female can be an excellent pilot, analyst, translator, drill instructor, prison guard, general, you name it. Just need to admit that the reverse is true: there are things men do better, and there is even missions where employing a female would actually be *detrimental*, and that is just a fact of life we need to accept.
agree
@@supportsniper4626 AGAIN
My younger daughter is in the Army. She's a Sgt. She's still in. Even though she can do the PT, she says she always struggles with it more than the guys. And SHE IS one, tough, chick!. My older daughter was a Quartermaster, in the Navy for five years. She hated it. One term, and out.
@@dragunovbushcraft152 Of all the few girls I actually knew (Which was like a handful because I'm a loser lmao) only one friend actually passed the requirements and managed to join the infantry. And even then after deployment a few times she couldn't stand shooting other people so she switched to being a combat medic instead, preferring to save as many lives as possible in combat instead of taking it. She's no longer alive, killed while trying to help a critically injured enemy troop. The sweetest people always die young for some reason.
yes . but that doesn’t mean women don’t deserve the same opportunities and respect as men. personally, i know plenty of women who has what it takes it be a marine more than certain men i know. yet i still agree we’re different in many ways, i think in rare cases there are women who CAN do these things-so why not give them the opportunity to do so? it just seems silly to me. just because women would be let in infantry doesn’t mean it would automatically be female dominated. there’s still going to be more men then women- that’s inevitable. if there’s a couple ABLE women on the front lines then i don’t see the problem. over the years there has been less and less marines. so to reject a completely trained and abled marine just because she’s a women is quite silly.
Feminists and Liberals should listen to this and get this in their brain.
Men and women are not the same. We are equal but we are not the same. 2+2=4 but 3+1 also =4, they are equal but they are not the same.
Would be surprised if such candor did not destroy her career. Respect.
She is in uniform. Everything she said was pre-approved by the Commandant.
@@dohc22h probably written by him but the wokes and feminists will be apoplectic and spitting blood at her for saying it
It's true, the military is not sexist, they are just PRACTICAL. This officer said it all. Women can't physically handle the same amount of rigor that a man can, but there ARE ways for them to serve in the military, just DIFFERENT ways.
+Brian Merritt It seems that practical has come to mean sexist.
+Brian Merritt
If they are so "practical" then why hasn't the American military taken any new territory in the last few hundred years? It would be very practical to invade Canada or Mexico or a perhaps some of these Islands Nations.....but they don't: why is that? It's because the military has become completely subservient to the interests of the globalist bankers who are very practical in making sure the military does their dirty work for them; opening up markets which they want. So, yeah, if you are a bank or Warren Buffett, the American Military is super-practical, but otherwise not-so-much.
***** Invade Canada and Mexico....go to war for a patch of ice and a patch of desert...great plan dude.
Mad respect to the lady.. I'm not even from US
She's what a strong woman is.. That's why people respect and admire her
The part that shocked me was she tried so hard he cant have kids and even then didnt reach the level of a man. Good for her in standing for her beliefs and joining but thats one hell of a sacrifice
Is that a sacrifice or foolishness?
Unless it's absolutely necessary, no man is going to get infertile.
@@blessedslaveExactly lol, Women want to become something which they are not made for.
Now this is what you call a strong woman. Respect to her
I'm gonna make this simple. You're on enemy ground on mission, you get shot in the leg, you have to be carried a mile to be safely medivaced. Would you rather an average sized man, or woman carry you out. I understand there are outliers, but the average infantry woman wouldn't be successful. But the average, combat-trained man would more than likely be capable.
If they can pass the fitness test then yes, they are qualified to be there just as every man who qualified. The issue is having to lower the standards for women when those standards are what keep the infantry prepared. Don't make this harder than it needs to be. Its a rather simple concept.
the problem is, the test are different. Expected results are different for women
On the other side id rather carry the woman. Just sayin
Mixed units seem to be less combat effective for one reason or another. It's gotta be either all males or all females.
i think that even if they both pass the same military tests women are hormonally unstable and will still perform worse.
"As women, we demand equal opportunities in the military. We want jobs men do because women can do anything a man can... but the military shouldn't be able to order us to deploy to combat zones and fight because we're women."
Equality in 2015.
Right cause that's logical. Equality is a two way street people!
They rally for that then when they get into the infantry they become infertile then they sue the Army for letting them do it lmao
+hsiehman so true
+hsiehman One actually exceptional, high achieving lady in military will just be the 'bragging rights' for a thousand flabby feminists that will never dread the Draft ever.
Your either in combat rolls like men, or your not?....Everybody from both genders will automatically be enrolled into severe combat areas, and everybody will pull their own weight. Literally.....Women WILL be told to go combat ready at a moments notice, just like the men........It's called gender equality.
Thanks to her for speaking the truth !
For fucks sake, you don't try out combat. Are you fucking kidding me with that? Here girls, try out killing someone. See if you like it. You either can fucking do it, or you can't. There is so much more that goes into it than pulling a damn trigger. This marine should be applauded. It broke my heart to hear her say that combat made her infertile. These feminists need to listen to her. This isn't a game, it's not something you try out. You women who want this better understand that if you go into combat, you better be able to do exactly what your male counterparts can do. They are trusting you to be up to the task. If you're not, you have just betrayed your brother in arms. If you can't pass the male standards, you are not up to the task.
There are way too many movies out now that have over-glorified hyped-up the miniscule roles that women have played in recent conflicts. Now, you have women out there who actually believe a woman can kick a Man's ass in combat. I'm actually HOPING for the day when women's KIA numbers exceed those of Men, so we can hoist a healthy dose of reality on all the feminist retards out there, and maybe get back to sensibility and logic!
but you can't use numbers and statistics against feminists? didn't work against the wage gap, didn't work about rape statistics so why would it work now :D
sad but true
So I'm a female and I believe in equal rights for men and women. We shouldn't put women, nor men, in these stereotypical roles. However, when it comes to physical strength I Know that average women cannot match up to the average man. I think it's dangerous and irresponsible putting females in combat positions in our military. Believe me, I wish we were as strong as men but it's just not the way we were built. I've come to except that MAYBE women will naturally be better caregivers and men better muscles. If your average female cannot carry your average male comrade out of harms way when he needs it, that's a man left behind for the enemy or a female comrade accompanying him for the ride cause she couldn't retreat to a safe location quickly enough. I mean equality would be great and all but, to me, you literally have to be EQUAL to receive the same treatment. (Equal strength for the job, equal intelligence for the job, equal experience, etc.) I could go on forever but you know, no one would really read past this.
verns I give free knuckle sandwiches if that's how u want it
Agree with you Vanessa Torres.
What's important is who to best get the job done.
A dolphin is a superior swimmer, and a tiger is superior hunter in forests. Equality does not mean the dolphin is supposed to be able to hunt in forest just as well as a tiger could: that's just stupid. Equal standing as in equal respect and equal voice, yes, but people should take jobs based on what they can do best at, and leave the political quotas out.
vanessa torres
god makes no mistakes hun.
this is total equality 😏mgtow.
penis envy😂😂😂😂😭😭
Vanessa Torres Well said. I agree 100% . Unfortunately , there are very few rationale minded women like you these days.
When a female soldier is faced in close quarter combat against a male enemy, the result can be tragic.
"Sarah you've been hit in the upper thigh!"
"No. I just started my period."
most people when doing extended patrols either wear diapers or load their shorts as needed ... the women i served with wore and brought all the needed feminine products required .. which also double duty as excellent gauze packs for open wounds ... women are worth being in the front lines ... i know this from experience.
@@0623kaboom Just depends. If you gotta lug their SAW and kit on your back through the desert because they're too weak... not so much.
I think it all boils down to maintaining the standards. If they can meet them, heck yeah, fire it up!
@@0623kaboom wait, infantry men wear diapers when on long patrols!?
*The more you know*
Hahahaha
Bwhhahaha !!! 😅😅😅😅