Very interesting. I watched some of the Strange Situation videos online. The difference in the behaviors of different toddlers is amazing, and I noticed a significant difference in the way the mothers interacted with the toddlers.
>But it explores how to understand and evaluate these theories, methods, and findings from an Objectivist perspective. Good for Gorlin. This could benefit many students.
This was very informative. With Psychology being so diluted with questions and theories, it was difficult for me to approach this field for study. Now that she was able to narrow things down more basically, I can finally approach this field more easily. 💯👏🏽
@@johndavis5654 If one does not value ones life, then no F or F response. You provide an example, not definition, of innate ideas. Idea->value->emotion. Ideas are a type of knowledge of reality resulting from the minds processing of perceptions. If you perceive a tree, you can form the idea of tree. Before birth, sensations but no perceptions and no mind (Zen fetus!). Thus no innate ideas. Man cant know reality w/ideas prior to knowing reality w/perceptions. Mysticism and subjectivism, but not the focused mind (objectivity) ,require innate ideas. Intro To Objectivist Epistemology-Ayn Rand; new theory of ideas.
@@TeaParty1776 The word Idea does refer to being innate. Plato invented the word to mean just that, that the other world of forms was separate from thought and prior to thought. But we know, as you say, that thoughts are the result of the minds processing of perceptions. Thoughts are not in another world separate from perceptions and thoughts are posterior. The best practice is to follow Aristotle's lead and never use the word 'idea' unless you are referring to Plato's theory. Otherwise, just say 'thought.' 'What a great 'thought' and 'what a great idea' only sound similar to us today because of the centuries of introducing Plato's doctrines as if they are not nonsense, but they are nonsense, and thus 'What a great thought and What a great idea are not similar at all but worlds a part.
"If it takes 5 machines 5 minutes to make 5 widgets, how long would it take 100 machines to make 100 widgets?" It depends on how the machines work. It's a trick question. There is no correct answer. If the machines operate sequentially (only one can be running at a time), then it would take 100 minutes. Horrible example of whatever Kheneman (whatever his name) is trying to show (that we are just so irrational?). So much of cognitive science is psychologists saying, "look how irrational humans are," when, in fact, they are just misinterpreting unknown behavior.
Get what? Value? From Psychology? You wage Mission Impossible. It's not measurable. It's test results, its research cannot be replicated. 8 from 10 practitioners are incompetent. Go talk to an older person at the bus stop, or a bunch of 12 year old boys.
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
Fantastic video
Great job Gena!
Great video!
Very interesting. I watched some of the Strange Situation videos online. The difference in the behaviors of different toddlers is amazing, and I noticed a significant difference in the way the mothers interacted with the toddlers.
>But it explores how to understand and evaluate these theories, methods, and findings from an Objectivist perspective.
Good for Gorlin. This could benefit many students.
This was very informative. With Psychology being so diluted with questions and theories, it was difficult for me to approach this field for study. Now that she was able to narrow things down more basically, I can finally approach this field more easily. 💯👏🏽
Thus philosophy!
I had no idea you all were still doing this.
In the objectivist philosophy of Ayn Rand I wondered if this title meant; get the value out of psychology, or get the value out of psychology.
Doesn't the insight that emotions are a product of thinking go against the idea that there is "innate temperament"?
Temperament also includes purely material facts,eg, brain,nervous system. Ed Locke discusses this. Innate ideas, however, are impossible.
@@TeaParty1776it depends what you mean by innate ideas. For example is the fight or flight response an emotion or an innate idea ?
@@johndavis5654 If one does not value ones life, then no F or F response. You provide an example, not definition, of innate ideas.
Idea->value->emotion. Ideas are a type of knowledge of reality resulting from the minds processing of perceptions. If you perceive a tree, you can form the idea of tree. Before birth, sensations but no perceptions and no mind (Zen fetus!). Thus no innate ideas. Man cant know reality w/ideas prior to knowing reality w/perceptions. Mysticism and subjectivism, but not the focused mind (objectivity) ,require innate ideas.
Intro To Objectivist Epistemology-Ayn Rand; new theory of ideas.
@@johndavis5654 Innate idea-absurd claim that man knows reality prior to knowing reality.
@@TeaParty1776 The word Idea does refer to being innate. Plato invented the word to mean just that, that the other world of forms was separate from thought and prior to thought. But we know, as you say, that thoughts are the result of the minds processing of perceptions. Thoughts are not in another world separate from perceptions and thoughts are posterior. The best practice is to follow Aristotle's lead and never use the word 'idea' unless you are referring to Plato's theory. Otherwise, just say 'thought.' 'What a great 'thought' and 'what a great idea' only sound similar to us today because of the centuries of introducing Plato's doctrines as if they are not nonsense, but they are nonsense, and thus 'What a great thought and What a great idea are not similar at all but worlds a part.
Does Rand include Plato as a misintegration of psychology? But Freud and Skinnner were misintegrations. She is unclear here.
The Presocratic philosophers studied everything and by every method: myth, folk wisdom, common sense, and philosophy.
Studying daily mood is selective. Is that basic to psychology? Why? Philosophical context?
"If it takes 5 machines 5 minutes to make 5 widgets, how long would it take 100 machines to make 100 widgets?" It depends on how the machines work. It's a trick question. There is no correct answer. If the machines operate sequentially (only one can be running at a time), then it would take 100 minutes. Horrible example of whatever Kheneman (whatever his name) is trying to show (that we are just so irrational?). So much of cognitive science is psychologists saying, "look how irrational humans are," when, in fact, they are just misinterpreting unknown behavior.
There is a simple ratio established with this question. The rate at which each machine produces a widget is evenly proportional.
Mind and consciousness are great mystery. This is the reason I'm deeply spiritual. 🙏
Rand explained the mystery w/mind/body unity and volitional mind.
Get what? Value? From Psychology? You wage Mission Impossible. It's not measurable. It's test results, its research cannot be replicated. 8 from 10 practitioners are incompetent. Go talk to an older person at the bus stop, or a bunch of 12 year old boys.
Mainstreamers evade free will, ie,evade psychology.
Animal "mind?!"