Ok so saying that the lens has a focal length of 15000mm is just wrong. The lens + phone combo has an equivalent focal length of 1500mm max if the amazon description actually tells the truth. I approximated the focal length of the combo more in the range of 1200mm by doing some calculations. As wildlife photographers we usually crop in a tad bit in post too so you using a 2x digital crop on your phone isn't that unrealistic but the quality is no where near the quality you would get with a dedicated camera and lens. Btw. this technically isn't the biggest phone lens out there. If you consider removing the current lens that is attatched to your phone as in the 26mm lens of the IPhone and instead of it add an adapter for something like an ef mount with the correct flange distance and used something like a Sigma 150-600mm you could get up to 2842mm FF equiv with just the lens. Now add a 2x tele converter to that lens and you'd get 5684mm FF equiv just using optics thus not loosing any resolution. And you might still get a better image quality as more expensive lenses like the Sigma usually have much better image quality as in reduced chromatic abberations and higher contrast at lower f-stops.
"this is better than my full frame camera" I sincerely hope you're joking on that one, otherwise you can donate your full frame camera to me, since apparently this lens+iphone is better so you won't need it right?
Bruh you need to get better at making videos this was a trash vid like its a 1500mm lens and you just digitally zoomed in with the iphone and the format of the video is so bad like you need to work on how to form a video and have a good structure. The whole video seemed random with those giant on screen captions and no clear structure. It felt as if there wasn't much point to the whole video amd could have been a short instead.
yikes bruh... many things wrong with this video but i don't wanna seem like i'm hating or anything especially considering other people mentioned enough of the things wrong, but... for anyone who wants real advice, getting a "real" camera plus a $200 lens that *isn't* a gimmick like the "biggest lens in the world" (really just the longest lens...) you will get way better results, i mean even a $50 lens will give way better results than this i just bought a kalimar 500mm f/8 lens for $30 and even with that lens on my MFT camera I could do 2x teleconverter mode on it and still get way better quality than what was displayed in this video, please don't fall for these gimmicks... the lens he bought for his full frame camera is obviously trash and not worth $200, that's why the quality was terrible, not because you can't get a better image quality at the intended focal length (+ he should not have put it on a full frame camera if maximum range is what he wanted, a micro four thirds camera would be much better for this as it already doubles the equivalent full frame focal length WITHOUT digital zoom)
Ok so saying that the lens has a focal length of 15000mm is just wrong. The lens + phone combo has an equivalent focal length of 1500mm max if the amazon description actually tells the truth. I approximated the focal length of the combo more in the range of 1200mm by doing some calculations. As wildlife photographers we usually crop in a tad bit in post too so you using a 2x digital crop on your phone isn't that unrealistic but the quality is no where near the quality you would get with a dedicated camera and lens. Btw. this technically isn't the biggest phone lens out there. If you consider removing the current lens that is attatched to your phone as in the 26mm lens of the IPhone and instead of it add an adapter for something like an ef mount with the correct flange distance and used something like a Sigma 150-600mm you could get up to 2842mm FF equiv with just the lens. Now add a 2x tele converter to that lens and you'd get 5684mm FF equiv just using optics thus not loosing any resolution. And you might still get a better image quality as more expensive lenses like the Sigma usually have much better image quality as in reduced chromatic abberations and higher contrast at lower f-stops.
You missed an opportunity to call it the perfect vlogging lens 😂😂😂😂
"this is better than my full frame camera" I sincerely hope you're joking on that one, otherwise you can donate your full frame camera to me, since apparently this lens+iphone is better so you won't need it right?
Bruh you need to get better at making videos this was a trash vid like its a 1500mm lens and you just digitally zoomed in with the iphone and the format of the video is so bad like you need to work on how to form a video and have a good structure. The whole video seemed random with those giant on screen captions and no clear structure. It felt as if there wasn't much point to the whole video amd could have been a short instead.
yikes bruh... many things wrong with this video but i don't wanna seem like i'm hating or anything especially considering other people mentioned enough of the things wrong, but...
for anyone who wants real advice, getting a "real" camera plus a $200 lens that *isn't* a gimmick like the "biggest lens in the world" (really just the longest lens...) you will get way better results, i mean even a $50 lens will give way better results than this
i just bought a kalimar 500mm f/8 lens for $30 and even with that lens on my MFT camera I could do 2x teleconverter mode on it and still get way better quality than what was displayed in this video, please don't fall for these gimmicks... the lens he bought for his full frame camera is obviously trash and not worth $200, that's why the quality was terrible, not because you can't get a better image quality at the intended focal length (+ he should not have put it on a full frame camera if maximum range is what he wanted, a micro four thirds camera would be much better for this as it already doubles the equivalent full frame focal length WITHOUT digital zoom)
clean your sensor smh