My favorite part of this is Einstein's role in explaining Planck with the Photoelectric Effect, arguably the basis of quantum mechanics. In a sense, Einstein was the father of quantum mechanics, as he clearly was of relativity. Yet many people maintain that he either failed to understand it or rejected it, even though he was one of the core creators of the field and its theories.
Well, as is pointed out..quantum mechanics is weird and unintuitive...and it seems like every time someone uncovers a new level of the weirdness, even THEY have a hard time believing what they just figured out. In some cases, they don't want to believe it, cause what they discover is like being on a map, looking at a state, and you zoom in, thinking..OK..I;ll get to see some streets and buildings, but instead, finding a whole new country that no one has ever heard of. Isador Rabi said, "Who ordered that?" in reference to discovering Muons. But that is often the sentiment when something new and strange pops up in Quantum Mechanics.
I'd heard that Einstein was opposed to his own findings because he hated the random elements, and was like, "no, there has to be some way to make it precise! Randomness begets superstition!" I don't know how accurate that is though. It's just what I've heard.
@@LendriMujina This is way off, Lendri. It takes a single quote from debate where Einstein and Bohr were raising issues _to grow together and learn more about quantum mechanics_ into a lifelong position he never held. The evidence of this? Einstien went on working in QM for his entire life and advanced the field in many ways, such as the theoretical discovery of the Bose-Einstein condensate, which we now make in a lab.
@@LendriMujina Gladly. And don't feel bad. This misunderstanding has been around for over 50 years. It's one of the myths in popular superstition about science.
The hottest band on the planet! Too bad that light going through a prism thing has been done. For sure you could do your own version of... ... The Ultraviolet Side of the Moon! (I'll let myself out)
I live just up the road from Lord Rayleigh's home in Terling, Essex, UK, and it's great to see the recognition of his work, explained briefly, but perfectly. For the record the double noble prize winners observatory, and laboratory is still there untouched, left as he left it in 1919. Keep up the great work, and get the youth fascinated about the physical world.
Hi. I am several years late to the party, but this blonde-blue hair is absolutely flawlessly perfect. I also like the enthusiasm and happyness in these older video. Newer ones are imo more "scientific", more concrete, less broad so the topic is told more precisely and the professional level is higher there, but this older inner fire was just somethin' else.
Just revisiting to experience the amazing videos again with Physics Girl. Hope that she will recover from longcovid soon. Hope to see you soon in full swing!
If you can't admit that you're wrong after new evidence is found, then you're wrong. A good scientist will shake the hand of the person who presented the new evidence and thank him for proving his hypothesis wrong.
agreed. whenever i meet an atheist scientist i just smile and walk away. everything we know about the earth & universe, from invisible photons and UV rays, to radio waves from deep space points towards "the supernatural" and intelligent life being distinct possibilities.
@@gladitsnotme Good point. Atheists cannot be objective. They have prejudicely discounted an ontologically necessary and sound premise simply to appease their own egos. There is no other reason anyone is an atheist. It is ego worship. Pure and simple. No exceptions.
E=mc^2 came from playing around with the algebra of the formulas for special relativity. Special Relativity was one of the 5 major papers of Einstein's Miracle Year in 1905. Another one, which likely seemed to him more of a minor corollary, showed that as a consequence of that theory, E=mc^2. Although that way of writing it is actually just a special case for objects with no momentum and wasn't even the main way he expressed the conclusion. Incidentally, the paper mentioned in this video by Einstein was his work on the Photoelectric Effect, also written in 1905. They have him the Nobel Prize for that one because they didn't at the time award the prize for theory and that was the work he did that had the most practical impact on engineering physics. It was highly controversial and he didn't get the prize until he was already well recognized as the greatest physicist since Newton. When he got it, he said "finally" and didn't even bother showing up to the award ceremony.
If the relation between 2 quantities is logarithmic, the graph will not be eloquent, but using a logarithmic scale will reveal the "linearity" of the relation
This is a fun video, but to go deeper only welcomes confusion. 6 Quark formations determine all the atoms in our universe. Quantum Mechanics is difficult to explain to the laymen. The Bohr model of the atom is, indeed, outdated. The electrons do not "orbit" the atomic nucleus, and it takes a few years of physics education to explain why. Planck's number is a number that is taken into account only with the understanding that how it is used is in such a way as to say, "the more we discover, the less we know." Prior to the Hubble discovery of the Andromeda Galaxy, Einstein believed our galaxy was the universe; and he was THE premiere physicist of his time. So I liked the ending of this video. Science is the search for truth. It changes because of new discoveries and calculations. It's a fun ride which many embark, but when it's wrong, Science has no problem admitting it and then moving on to a clearer truth. This video was much better than the crap posted weeks ago concerning "5 easy Science tricks you can use to fool your friends." That wasn't the verbatim title, but rather the direction. Press minds; don't impress for clicks. Thank you.
What do you mean specifically when you say "6 quark formations determine all the atoms in our universe"? You can create any atomic nucleus with just two types of quarks, the up and the down. It's true that six types of quarks exist, but the other four aren't components of atoms, so if you're including them you may as well include the rest of the standard model particles, which brings us to 17. Six quarks, 3 leptons, 3 neutrinos, and 5 bosons. Most of them are important in some way in atomic interactions or nucleosynthesis, except maybe the 4 largest quarks and the two largest leptons and neutrinos (though because of neutrino oscillations you'd end up with all three coming from certain decays).
This video is excellent, all the way around. Production, ease of understanding, visual aids, humor, seriousness, depth of content, and length. I greatly appreciate the work put into this, Thank You ALL!
1:48 - So, in 100+ years we have moved from the silliness of things being made up of things vibrating like springs to our more enlightened view of things being made up of things vibrating like strings.
@@michaelcherokee8906 - She explains it at 1:48 Back then it was postulated that everything was made of very small vibrating springs. Now, the popular theory (String Theory) postulates that at its base level everything is made of vibrating strings. It struck me as funny that the only difference in the two is a single letter. You change a "p" to a "t" and springs becomes strings. How far we have come. 😂🤣😂🤣
@@sam21462 I guess I was distracted at 1:48 then. Also, I didnt even notice the difference between 'spring' and 'string', I thought you said the same thing twice nd were marvelling at how there's no difference.
@@michaelcherokee8906 - The part where it was so easy to think that I had said the same thing twice is the part that I find absolutely marvelous. 100 years of brilliant minds rolling out equation after equation that I will never come close to understanding and in the end they just changed one letter. Please note, this is simply meant as humor and is by no means a correct examination of the situation. In fact, it is a grotesquely distorted examination of the situation. 😁
IceMetalPunk No, she is very intelligent and has a unique candor about herself. The message is most important, not the messenger. Content always, over frivolousness. She was talked into the hair color ploy, I guarantee.
Clearly not her reason. She did this to match the topic of the video - ultraviolet catastrophe. Not sure how this wasn't obvious, but now you know. It was whimsical, and fun
Daley I mistook it for the lighting until I saw this reply. The unpredictable and charming nature of people, is it partially influenced by the sub atomic particles they're comprised of?
One glorious highspeed journey through the history of quantum mechanics. Great and thank you! I'm missing Neils Bohr in the story, but nice to get Lord Raleigh and the ultraviolet catastrophe, i never heard actually something interesting on that before. Very nice and admirable how you jump around like a superexited ultraviolet quantum! Exciting and educational video!
The term "Ultra-violet Catastrophe" was first used by Paul Ehrenfest in 1911 talking about the Rayleigh Jeans law from 1905 and his attempts from 1903 to 1906 to solve the blackbody radiation problem using classical physics , Planck's work is from late 1900, but Planck was aware of a first try from Rayleigh from early that year (in 1900). So the catastrophe was solved before it was discovered... It was more like the desperation from those who couldnt accept the new quantum approach of physics. But i guess it wouldnt make a catchy soundbyte...
I'm so happy, I've been given this video to watch for my A levels, to further myself in education I need to watch a RUclips channel I enjoy... Incredible
This means absolutely nothing, but three weeks ago I treated Lord Rayleigh's grandson here in Vancouver. I'm studying to be a massage therapist and he was one of my patients; we got talking about medicine and science and he brought up that his grandfather had received a Nobel for discovering Argon and was also the one who explained why the sky is blue, among other things. That day when you feel insignificant...
Great video! Actually, the "many worlds" interpretation of quantum mechanics is fairly intuitive. It's pretty much the only one that is sensible. E.g. it's not that the electron gets locked down to a single position when you measure it, but you and your measuring equipment get "entangled" with the electron, so you only observe the electron at that specific location. The electron still exists at its other possible locations, but you can't observe it.
The Ender Golem Yes, but the blacbody is more of a thought experiment, different from a blackhole (although, as you pointed out, they have things in common).
+Jacobo Pindado To an outside observer, in every sense the "phenomena" of the black hole did emit the radiation. Also, the exact wavelength of the radiation measured by an observer does match the exact temperature of the black hole (matching the entropy load defined by it's mass) from the frame of reference of that observer predicted by Planck's law.
I teach physics in high school. I've taught kids just out of junior school who are already aware of cutting edge science. Granted, this is rare, but it does happen. Some kids are just that passionate about science and now, with the Internet, they can find out about this stuff easily.
". . . only a nibble of the cookie of quantum weirdness," matched with a video clip of biting into a cookie. It's this kind of weirdness that makes Physics Girl worth watching. She makes physics fun.
The pacing in this video is 10/10! Awesome video :) out of curiosity did you starting making the video before or after your got the new hair colour? :P
You know, in light of that really idiotic Cape Town 'decolonize science/science must fall' video that was trending recently, this is a really fantastic episode. Science is much deeper than facts and theories. It is a frame of mind. *When the observation does not match the theory, one changes the theory NOT the observation.* And this is an idea I've carried over to other parts of my life. For example: when someone presents facts and statistics that challenge my deeply held beliefs and narrative, my beliefs/narrative has to change NOT the facts. Because in the pursuit of truth, one should put aside ego, irrationality, and presuppositions for repeatable, observable, and objective answers. And that's something that those UCT students could use in spades.
Anyway, I went on a tangent without really commenting on the video. Loved it. Although it did seem a little jumpier than usual. Maybe I only recently noticed.
@@rushthezeppelin It's a rule on the list somewhere; don't piss off a witch doctor; they have their ways. "I didn't go to eight years of witch doctor school for nothing!"
fun fact: "black" is cognate to the word "bright" and is also cognate to blanc, blanco, bianco (in French, Spanish and Italian respectively), all meaning "white". The word "blank" is also cognate with "black". The English word "white" comes from wheat, which is the color you get when you grind it to flour. The change in meaning is because when something glows bright it can end up charred, and thus it becomes the color of char. The Old English word for Black was something like "sweart".
11000k = 11,000,000. I'll assume you meant 11,000 K which is a measure of temperature and is roughly equivalent to that on the surface of our sun. (the coldest part of the sun)
+Warrior Son don't be like that. There are plenty of RUclips channels that invite and welcome comments like that. This isn't one of them. Dianna is an intelligent woman who enjoys physics and has a good time teaching it to the physics-curious. If you don't enjoy her message, why can't you just go elsewhere rather than stay here to insult?
This is by far the best video physics girl..I would love to see more of your videos like this by starting from history of science to its present state..Great fan of you by the way..Keep rocking and physicing...
As always, an awesome video. Please never stop making them and, I love the hair, 😍. I really enjoy your work and continue to tell as many people that i can to, at least, let their children watch something good for them.
Thank you, Dianna for creating these amazing videos, for me it's like iTunesU physics video lectures but in more compact format -:) I hope I'll being able to hook up my daughter on your videos to get her interested in physics before she will be having her Physics classes next year -:)
The graph we saw for the spectrum, there are two things I would appreciate it if someone either confirm or refute: 1. The frequencies of light are gamma distributed. 2. Specifically, the curve is a Probability Density Function.
Il y a mieux, il y a quelques vidéos de conférences/cours d’Étienne Klein qui sans rentrer dans les mathématiques explique les problématiques et donne un contexte historique intéressant.
The Photoelectic Effect. About Electrons being exted by electons or photons and emiting photons when the electons deexcited. useing the Equations E=hf and c=fλ. The teacher is pretty bad. it Nice having someone on youtube to explain it.
Oh, Dianna, you're so adorable and the questions you make us think about are really amazing. Physics is one of my favorite subjects and you explain it with such grace, humour and simplicity, although the complexity of nature.
***** Exactly haha she isn't so it shouldn't matter. Just because insane sjw/feminists tend to have that hair color shouldn't mean that they should be the ONLY ones that can have it. It doesn't look bad inherently.
The weird part is she said 'a violet catastophy' in the video LITERALLY a second after I read your comm, making it all clear. Damn weirdest synchronicity o.O.
Superb presentation of an amazing topic. Understanding has been expanded. Contextual realization(s) of the quantum idea(s) that are currently favored are beginning to shed light {pun intended} on the true nature of nature. Bravo! More like this one, please.
Physics Girl I love all your videos and use them in my middle school Physics classes. I hope my students come away feeling the excitement you express for science. I also want the girls to realize it is ok to be smart and "nerds" are cool!
Love the colour you dyed your hair with. I love violet and indigo. Also: This is was a very well done and interesting video! New stuff learned once again!
If you measure the electron and find where it is, then how do you know that it could have been anywhere, when you've measured its exact location? In other words how do you know there's a probability cloud anyway?
The double slit experiment shows that one particle can interfere with itself. this is accomplished by being in two places at once (kinda). However if the electron is "observed" then the interference pattern disappears. See any of the many videos on the double slit experiment for more info :)
I can imagine the planning behind this awesome video. If she talked to someone else about the props, “Ok we’re gonna need LED lights a computer chip, and a cookie” “Why a cookie?” “Umm.... >.>”
everybody in the comment section talking about the hair color.. guys she just talked about the foundation of quantum mechanics like seriously the hair color is more important than that? I am not saying that it is bad but you can just appreciate it without bringing it up and focus on the active topic..
As a welder. I've come into contact with blackbody radiation for years now, and I never quite understood it. I've had books explaining it to me, and stuff like that. And sure, in practice I knew what I could do. But now, seeing a video of 5 years ago. I kinda wished I simply looked for a video of the subject, 5 years ago. Of course you had a video on it. And it makes a lot more sense now. Stay awesome!
i love how you said that, "the microscopic world just misbehaves" the very small often misbehave when no one is looking.......(a nod to the double slit test)
because they look great, And the color of the hair lines up with the story, in case soem wievers are too mesmerised with her appealing looks , color of her hair links them back to the story.
@physicsgirl i just want to say your are a great inspiration to me im a senior in hs and im about to go to college for physics and i just want to say thank you so much for all you do
So if you teach science class as a series of facts to be memorized, you're doing it wrong. Teach the method of science, and your students will always be self correcting.
Thanks so much, brought a few things together. But you could mention Schrödinger's moggy and the Observer Effect re the electron. Love the purple hair... nice enthusiastic and humorous presentation
This video elaboeates for the whole spectrum of the universe, and it is impresive.. And perhaps this explains the spectrum you're emanating Ms. Cowern, you're extatic for science,as do we all.. Keep up the great job of explaining science.
Your mentioning Rayleigh reminded me of the MIT folk song: Tell me why the stars do shine; Tell me why the ivy twines; Tell me why the sky's so blue; And I'll tell you just why I love you. Nuclear fusion makes the stars shine; Tropisms make the ivy twine; Rayleigh Scattering makes the sky so blue; And gonads and hormones are why I love you.
1:35 -- "Kind of funny ... that the brightest thing in our solar system [the sun] is the closest thing we know to a 'black body'" -- so cool! I'm still trying to wrap my mind around the physics concept of a black body, and the, apparently, many applications this idea has.
Don't worry, we think it sounds odd too. I've always said it as five thousand five hundred. I've also regularly heard people who say it as 55 hundred say 55 thousand (not necessarily the same 55 at the beginning, but for example...) then get themselves confused trying to figure between what they said and what they thought lol.
I think it's disingenuous to call quantum mechanics 'weird'. You're talking to the kids that are going to figure it out. Quantum mechanics isn't weird... it's the way the universe is. Only our understanding is 'weird'.
Why can't you people see that particles are just artifacts in the Quantum Fields :P I'm just sitting here and going -.- People are still sticking to an old interpretation of the particle: a building block of the universe. Even the probability-cloud view is a bit old, I think; it just seems too mystical. It doesn't explain the transition between the electron when measured and the cloud when not measured. The Quantum Field view does a sort of better job at this: the particle is not so different from the cloud, the cloud is just the collapse of dense waves in one of the Quantum Field. But this is all from the top of my head. So, thoughts?
Dianna, I freakin' love your video! I messed in mind-bending physics as an undergrad decades ago. In my spare time I still try to come closer to actually understanding the physics that underlies chemistry and everything else. So why do I love your vid? 1) Great explanations with engaging storytelling. 2) Dry humor. You never laugh out loud, but to an attentive listener, it is hilarious! 3) I can use your vid to show my daughter how to be awesome. Learn science -- it is fascinating and fun. You can be a storyteller, videographer, a teacher, and an active participant in the life of humans in this fascinating universe!
What's the difference between a board and a plank? Boards can change, but Planck's constant.
boooooooooo
yes!! Love science puns
I award you 10 pun points.
Physics Girl
Haha! Thank you!
Physics Gir l
I love physics
I adore PHYSICS 💗 💓
Then you should patronize another channel. Because this girl doesnt get it.
@@ahmad138 SIMP.
@@Astrochronic why thou?
@@Astrochronic shut the f*** up
My favorite part of this is Einstein's role in explaining Planck with the Photoelectric Effect, arguably the basis of quantum mechanics. In a sense, Einstein was the father of quantum mechanics, as he clearly was of relativity. Yet many people maintain that he either failed to understand it or rejected it, even though he was one of the core creators of the field and its theories.
Well, as is pointed out..quantum mechanics is weird and unintuitive...and it seems like every time someone uncovers a new level of the weirdness, even THEY have a hard time believing what they just figured out. In some cases, they don't want to believe it, cause what they discover is like being on a map, looking at a state, and you zoom in, thinking..OK..I;ll get to see some streets and buildings, but instead, finding a whole new country that no one has ever heard of. Isador Rabi said, "Who ordered that?" in reference to discovering Muons. But that is often the sentiment when something new and strange pops up in Quantum Mechanics.
I'd heard that Einstein was opposed to his own findings because he hated the random elements, and was like, "no, there has to be some way to make it precise! Randomness begets superstition!"
I don't know how accurate that is though. It's just what I've heard.
@@LendriMujina This is way off, Lendri. It takes a single quote from debate where Einstein and Bohr were raising issues _to grow together and learn more about quantum mechanics_ into a lifelong position he never held. The evidence of this? Einstien went on working in QM for his entire life and advanced the field in many ways, such as the theoretical discovery of the Bose-Einstein condensate, which we now make in a lab.
@@sidkemp4672 So I definitely heard way wrong then. Thanks for clearing that up for me.
@@LendriMujina Gladly. And don't feel bad. This misunderstanding has been around for over 50 years. It's one of the myths in popular superstition about science.
I definitely want to start a rock band and name it the Ultraviolet Catastrophe.
I like that, and I'll be your first groupie.
Ultraviolent catastrophe
Dammit you beat me to it!
The hottest band on the planet!
Too bad that light going through a prism thing has been done.
For sure you could do your own version of...
... The Ultraviolet Side of the Moon!
(I'll let myself out)
What's gonna be the name of your first album? Radon Daughters or Chrome Lipstick?
I live just up the road from Lord Rayleigh's home in Terling, Essex, UK, and it's great to see the recognition of his work, explained briefly, but perfectly. For the record the double noble prize winners observatory, and laboratory is still there untouched, left as he left it in 1919. Keep up the great work, and get the youth fascinated about the physical world.
Snatoms!
Hello there! I love your channel!
What about them?
IKR I wonder if she had the expansion or the standard glucose set :)
Interesting use a hydrogen atom - electron?? what?
you know it.
VERATASIUM HIMSELF
Hi. I am several years late to the party, but this blonde-blue hair is absolutely flawlessly perfect. I also like the enthusiasm and happyness in these older video. Newer ones are imo more "scientific", more concrete, less broad so the topic is told more precisely and the professional level is higher there, but this older inner fire was just somethin' else.
Are you blind? Her hair is ultraviolet.
Definitely a balance is needed
Just revisiting to experience the amazing videos again with Physics Girl. Hope that she will recover from longcovid soon. Hope to see you soon in full swing!
Yay, I loved this! And the message at the end about being wrong is one of those things people don't like to emphasis about science but it's crucial.
Looking Glass Universe both of you guys are great teachers on RUclips!
If you can't admit that you're wrong after new evidence is found, then you're wrong. A good scientist will shake the hand of the person who presented the new evidence and thank him for proving his hypothesis wrong.
agreed. whenever i meet an atheist scientist i just smile and walk away. everything we know about the earth & universe, from invisible photons and UV rays, to radio waves from deep space points towards "the supernatural" and intelligent life being distinct possibilities.
and ironic, because she is so wrong though so much of this...lmao Girl brains...
@@gladitsnotme Good point. Atheists cannot be objective. They have prejudicely discounted an ontologically necessary and sound premise simply to appease their own egos. There is no other reason anyone is an atheist. It is ego worship. Pure and simple. No exceptions.
"When you switch a plus to a minus" lol true, or adding a random natural log somewhere to make something line up with the graph
I bet when he made the theory Einstein was like "ok... what if I square c then?... yeah that seems to work I'll go with that"
E=mc^2 came from playing around with the algebra of the formulas for special relativity. Special Relativity was one of the 5 major papers of Einstein's Miracle Year in 1905. Another one, which likely seemed to him more of a minor corollary, showed that as a consequence of that theory, E=mc^2. Although that way of writing it is actually just a special case for objects with no momentum and wasn't even the main way he expressed the conclusion.
Incidentally, the paper mentioned in this video by Einstein was his work on the Photoelectric Effect, also written in 1905. They have him the Nobel Prize for that one because they didn't at the time award the prize for theory and that was the work he did that had the most practical impact on engineering physics. It was highly controversial and he didn't get the prize until he was already well recognized as the greatest physicist since Newton. When he got it, he said "finally" and didn't even bother showing up to the award ceremony.
+Drakan R Actually, if you don't use the square of some velocity, the units don't work.
If the relation between 2 quantities is logarithmic, the graph will not be eloquent, but using a logarithmic scale will reveal the "linearity" of the relation
Drakan R Haha seems about right
In fact Max Planck did realise what he did immediately. He felt deeply depressed about it, but did it anyway. He indeed quantified light.
Came for my physics homework, stayed for the hair.
This is a fun video, but to go deeper only welcomes confusion. 6 Quark formations determine all the atoms in our universe. Quantum Mechanics is difficult to explain to the laymen. The Bohr model of the atom is, indeed, outdated. The electrons do not "orbit" the atomic nucleus, and it takes a few years of physics education to explain why.
Planck's number is a number that is taken into account only with the understanding that how it is used is in such a way as to say, "the more we discover, the less we know."
Prior to the Hubble discovery of the Andromeda Galaxy, Einstein believed our galaxy was the universe; and he was THE premiere physicist of his time. So I liked the ending of this video.
Science is the search for truth. It changes because of new discoveries and calculations. It's a fun ride which many embark, but when it's wrong, Science has no problem admitting it and then moving on to a clearer truth.
This video was much better than the crap posted weeks ago concerning "5 easy Science tricks you can use to fool your friends." That wasn't the verbatim title, but rather the direction. Press minds; don't impress for clicks. Thank you.
Such an intelligent walrus. Perhaps someday man will recognize the genius of our walrus brethren over that of the dolphins... before it's too late.
What do you mean specifically when you say "6 quark formations determine all the atoms in our universe"? You can create any atomic nucleus with just two types of quarks, the up and the down. It's true that six types of quarks exist, but the other four aren't components of atoms, so if you're including them you may as well include the rest of the standard model particles, which brings us to 17. Six quarks, 3 leptons, 3 neutrinos, and 5 bosons. Most of them are important in some way in atomic interactions or nucleosynthesis, except maybe the 4 largest quarks and the two largest leptons and neutrinos (though because of neutrino oscillations you'd end up with all three coming from certain decays).
Incongruous Walrus
***** You're right! Thank you.
don't you mean Rutherford's model of the atom is outdated?
beautiful video :) love the new hair! Purple suits you ;)
@ADARSH KUMAR BEHERA ?
It wasn't purple it was violet
@@rockyraccoon8270 ultra violet
Dammm the up and atom gurlll😁😁
SIMP
This video is excellent, all the way around. Production, ease of understanding, visual aids, humor, seriousness, depth of content, and length. I greatly appreciate the work put into this, Thank You ALL!
1:48 - So, in 100+ years we have moved from the silliness of things being made up of things vibrating like springs to our more enlightened view of things being made up of things vibrating like strings.
most underrated comment
I dont understand what you mean. What was the silliness a 100+ years ago?
@@michaelcherokee8906 - She explains it at 1:48 Back then it was postulated that everything was made of very small vibrating springs. Now, the popular theory (String Theory) postulates that at its base level everything is made of vibrating strings. It struck me as funny that the only difference in the two is a single letter. You change a "p" to a "t" and springs becomes strings. How far we have come. 😂🤣😂🤣
@@sam21462 I guess I was distracted at 1:48 then. Also, I didnt even notice the difference between 'spring' and 'string', I thought you said the same thing twice nd were marvelling at how there's no difference.
@@michaelcherokee8906 - The part where it was so easy to think that I had said the same thing twice is the part that I find absolutely marvelous. 100 years of brilliant minds rolling out equation after equation that I will never come close to understanding and in the end they just changed one letter.
Please note, this is simply meant as humor and is by no means a correct examination of the situation. In fact, it is a grotesquely distorted examination of the situation. 😁
The real catastrophe was when some thought it a good idea to temp spray color your hair to appeal to 12 yr. olds.
"Someone" like her and "12 year olds" like her and my 26-year-old self, you mean?
IceMetalPunk No, she is very intelligent and has a unique candor about herself.
The message is most important, not the messenger. Content always, over frivolousness.
She was talked into the hair color ploy, I guarantee.
She has the content. So should she wear a white sheet over her head (like a ghost) because anything else would be deemed frivolous? Let it go.
I really don't think youd be able to accurately guarantee that
Clearly not her reason. She did this to match the topic of the video - ultraviolet catastrophe. Not sure how this wasn't obvious, but now you know. It was whimsical, and fun
Your hair is so dope!
Daley I didn't notice the blue part.
ITS SOO COOOL!!
No wonder we missed it, ultraviolet is beyond the range of human sight.
Daley I mistook it for the lighting until I saw this reply. The unpredictable and charming nature of people, is it partially influenced by the sub atomic particles they're comprised of?
I was literally going to comment this
Still one of my favorite videos... So simple, yet so precise explaining such a relevant concept...
One glorious highspeed journey through the history of quantum mechanics. Great and thank you!
I'm missing Neils Bohr in the story, but nice to get Lord Raleigh and the ultraviolet catastrophe, i never heard actually something interesting on that before. Very nice and admirable how you jump around like a superexited ultraviolet quantum!
Exciting and educational video!
the speedo on my car was broken so I took it to my local quantum mechanics, now I can't find the car
It might still be broken or it might be fixed. You won't know until you look inside the shop.
Your speedo wasn't broken, The reading it showed was not relative to your frame of reference.
You left it parked in a different sample space.
As was "sample space" my love.
You are "probably" looking in the wrong place.
Ultraviolet Girl
Dig it!
SIMP
The term "Ultra-violet Catastrophe" was first used by Paul Ehrenfest in 1911 talking about the Rayleigh Jeans law from 1905 and his attempts from 1903 to 1906 to solve the blackbody radiation problem using classical physics , Planck's work is from late 1900, but Planck was aware of a first try from Rayleigh from early that year (in 1900). So the catastrophe was solved before it was discovered... It was more like the desperation from those who couldnt accept the new quantum approach of physics. But i guess it wouldnt make a catchy soundbyte...
I'm so happy, I've been given this video to watch for my A levels, to further myself in education I need to watch a RUclips channel I enjoy... Incredible
Anyone else think she needs to add red to the top of her head with green and yellow part way down?
Please get verified
oh my Cody from cody's lab Ur vids r good
Meh. Hey, Cody. Meh.
Cody'sLab your videos suck but your comments are worse
I wanna know who the snake wrangler was.
Ultraviolet...
Hey, your hair's extremely violet, or, may I say, ultraviolet?
A refreshingly different way of looking at physics!
I wish I could give it 10 thumbs ups.
i will give one like
You can go on other accounts or share
This means absolutely nothing, but three weeks ago I treated Lord Rayleigh's grandson here in Vancouver. I'm studying to be a massage therapist and he was one of my patients; we got talking about medicine and science and he brought up that his grandfather had received a Nobel for discovering Argon and was also the one who explained why the sky is blue, among other things. That day when you feel insignificant...
So when am I going to able to use a quantum computer to run crysis?
You can do that now, but there's no point. Quantum computers only surpass classical ones in matters of combinatorics.
*****
Not really. There's far more matrix arithmetic and matrix algebra involved in a GPU's work than combinatorics.
+IceMetalPunk no, it does, it needs to run with 64 gigabytes of DDR4 Ram, a quad core CPU and graphics that can render and de pixelate
Oscar Horsey
I'm not sure what any of that has to do with quantum computing?
+IceMetalPunk quantum computer - 👎🏼
OMG She used Snatoms at 1:48!!!!
nice catch.
I've been watching your videos since Derek introduced you in his channel.
Nice touch with the snatoms :-)
Physics Girl
Great video! Actually, the "many worlds" interpretation of quantum mechanics is fairly intuitive. It's pretty much the only one that is sensible.
E.g. it's not that the electron gets locked down to a single position when you measure it, but you and your measuring equipment get "entangled" with the electron, so you only observe the electron at that specific location.
The electron still exists at its other possible locations, but you can't observe it.
No.
Tbh This was a relief lecture I now finally understand about ultraviolet catastrophe.Thank you Physics Girl
Don't black holes
absorb (obviously)
emit (hawking radiation)
and doesn't reflect?
The Ender Golem Yes, but the blacbody is more of a thought experiment, different from a blackhole (although, as you pointed out, they have things in common).
The Ender Golem Hawking radiation isn't actually emited by the black hole,. It's just fotons that it failed to absorb.
+Jacobo Pindado To an outside observer, in every sense the "phenomena" of the black hole did emit the radiation. Also, the exact wavelength of the radiation measured by an observer does match the exact temperature of the black hole (matching the entropy load defined by it's mass) from the frame of reference of that observer predicted by Planck's law.
That's just what Hawkins et al said when they showed that black holes have temperature.
Physics girl, what sort of audience do you make your videos for? High school kids, uni undergraduates, or junior school?
myself when i was in high school. physics curious.
Cool, just wondering :) thanks for answering!
I like your new hair color. It looks awesome! Great video BTW!
I'm going to guess her target audience is ultra-religious young Earth creationists.
I teach physics in high school. I've taught kids just out of junior school who are already aware of cutting edge science. Granted, this is rare, but it does happen. Some kids are just that passionate about science and now, with the Internet, they can find out about this stuff easily.
THANK YOU!! I’ve been looking for a good video that thoroughly explains this for hours. Just in time for my test
". . . only a nibble of the cookie of quantum weirdness," matched with a video clip of biting into a cookie. It's this kind of weirdness that makes Physics Girl worth watching. She makes physics fun.
I understand why her hair relates to physics.
The pacing in this video is 10/10! Awesome video :) out of curiosity did you starting making the video before or after your got the new hair colour? :P
Awesome! thanks for the pacing feedback. Before. purely coincidence. I'm not that good at planning. Also I just love the color purple.
It looks great!
Physics Girl i love you
That "what ever.. Physicists" had me laughing.
The purple hair is an AWESOME touch!!
You know, in light of that really idiotic Cape Town 'decolonize science/science must fall' video that was trending recently, this is a really fantastic episode.
Science is much deeper than facts and theories. It is a frame of mind. *When the observation does not match the theory, one changes the theory NOT the observation.* And this is an idea I've carried over to other parts of my life. For example: when someone presents facts and statistics that challenge my deeply held beliefs and narrative, my beliefs/narrative has to change NOT the facts. Because in the pursuit of truth, one should put aside ego, irrationality, and presuppositions for repeatable, observable, and objective answers. And that's something that those UCT students could use in spades.
Anyway, I went on a tangent without really commenting on the video. Loved it. Although it did seem a little jumpier than usual. Maybe I only recently noticed.
You are correct, David. Science is methodological naturalism, a way of looking at the world around us.
But you still haven't explained how the witch doctor can call down a bolt of lightning............/sarc
@@rushthezeppelin It's a rule on the list somewhere; don't piss off a witch doctor; they have their ways. "I didn't go to eight years of witch doctor school for nothing!"
@@geraldfrost4710 I laughed at this far more than I should've, thanks for making a brighter day
There is some great editing in this video. And the material was really interesting too! I had no idea that Planck's quanta was just a lucky accident.
the position of electron that it can be anywhere until and unless we observe is called as super position
you explain really good
fun fact: "black" is cognate to the word "bright" and is also cognate to blanc, blanco, bianco (in French, Spanish and Italian respectively), all meaning "white". The word "blank" is also cognate with "black". The English word "white" comes from wheat, which is the color you get when you grind it to flour. The change in meaning is because when something glows bright it can end up charred, and thus it becomes the color of char.
The Old English word for Black was something like "sweart".
"Science isn't fixed facts", glad you said this. Religious fanatics always try to point out how science can be wrong and I'm always like "well duh."
your hair makes you look hot... no, really, it looks like a 11000k black body
so beautyful
Jesus Palacios but she's white tho...
Hey now, she was gorgeous even without the purple.
Search your feelings, you know it's true.
Jesus Palacios I'd say even hotter... like 25000°k or more
11000k = 11,000,000. I'll assume you meant 11,000 K which is a measure of temperature and is roughly equivalent to that on the surface of our sun. (the coldest part of the sun)
You explained this better than 90% of the other videos I found.
Thank You
I have so much respect for you, PhysicsGirl! :) You're awesome!
Thanks Dianna, this will help me with my chemistry tests. Nice UV hair!
+Warrior Son don't be like that. There are plenty of RUclips channels that invite and welcome comments like that. This isn't one of them. Dianna is an intelligent woman who enjoys physics and has a good time teaching it to the physics-curious. If you don't enjoy her message, why can't you just go elsewhere rather than stay here to insult?
If I could get a cookie every time I was wrong... I would have black hair. -Quantum Physics
This is by far the best video physics girl..I would love to see more of your videos like this by starting from history of science to its present state..Great fan of you by the way..Keep rocking and physicing...
As always, an awesome video. Please never stop making them and,
I love the hair, 😍.
I really enjoy your work and continue to tell as many people that i can to, at least, let their children watch something good for them.
Thank you, Dianna for creating these amazing videos, for me it's like iTunesU physics video lectures but in more compact format -:) I hope I'll being able to hook up my daughter on your videos to get her interested in physics before she will be having her Physics classes next year -:)
At 37°C, she's glowing hot! 😍
Not gonna lie...thought the same thing, lol. Love her enthusiasm! Go Physics Girl!
Bangin' AND brilliant!
The graph we saw for the spectrum, there are two things I would appreciate it if someone either confirm or refute:
1. The frequencies of light are gamma distributed.
2. Specifically, the curve is a Probability Density Function.
This is the greatest thing. So excited about your videos!
For those who understand French and want to know more about the UV Catastrophe and Quantum mechanics, I recommend a channel named "e-penser"
ZeugmaPowa cool ill check it out. J'ai etudié français pour 2 ans, mais c'est tres facile pour moi.
Il y a mieux, il y a quelques vidéos de conférences/cours d’Étienne Klein qui sans rentrer dans les mathématiques explique les problématiques et donne un contexte historique intéressant.
Lol i we just overd this in our A Level Physics Class
Isn't it nice when RUclips matches up with life? What did they teach in the class?
The Photoelectic Effect. About Electrons being exted by electons or photons and emiting photons when the electons deexcited. useing the Equations E=hf and c=fλ. The teacher is pretty bad. it Nice having someone on youtube to explain it.
I don't understand a word but, nice!
This made me fall in love with Physics all over again. Thank you.
Oh, Dianna, you're so adorable and the questions you make us think about are really amazing. Physics is one of my favorite subjects and you explain it with such grace, humour and simplicity, although the complexity of nature.
You're a treasure Dianna!
(Physics 101 lessons are just over so I'm re-watching the old Physics Girl's stuff)
The gorgeous natural blonde hair is partially gone more importantly.
Hey haha her hair is just as gorgeous now.
Joseph X its for the theme of this video
Her hair makes her look like those insane sjw/feminists, which she can't be because she's smart and attractive.
***** Exactly haha she isn't so it shouldn't matter. Just because insane sjw/feminists tend to have that hair color shouldn't mean that they should be the ONLY ones that can have it. It doesn't look bad inherently.
+Mike Wilhelm If I were a woman and I'd have to put up with morons like you every day I'd be an insane sjw/feminist too. Grow up.
Your channel is great. I enjoy the geekiness of your enthusiasm for science and sharing science. Thanks!
The whole video is an amazing summary of the quantum model of light.. Checking answers in the back of the book part got me 😂
somehow it's not until 5 minutes-in that i notice the hair color.
i know ts such a violet catastrophe ;)
sorry
Out.
P DaPhuuLz .....don't feel bad, i didn't notice it at all, until i read your comment.
One could say that your hair is a... _Violet Catastrophe_.
(it actually looks nice I just had to make that joke)
The weird part is she said 'a violet catastophy' in the video LITERALLY a second after I read your comm, making it all clear. Damn weirdest synchronicity o.O.
Now I wonder if she did that on purpose
Perhaps the color is called violet catastrophe. Women's products often have weird names. Just look at all the make up names used for their colors.
One of the best descriptions of the ultraviolet catastrophe I’ve seen.
Superb presentation of an amazing topic. Understanding has been expanded.
Contextual realization(s) of the quantum idea(s) that are currently favored are beginning to shed light {pun intended} on the true nature of nature. Bravo! More like this one, please.
Love the hair! I fully support hair colors in the heigh frequencies.
oh please....smh
Man, I could watch her speak all day long
Dehydration is real my friend.
SIMP
Physics Girl I love all your videos and use them in my middle school Physics classes. I hope my students come away feeling the excitement you express for science. I also want the girls to realize it is ok to be smart and "nerds" are cool!
Love the colour you dyed your hair with. I love violet and indigo.
Also: This is was a very well done and interesting video! New stuff learned once again!
physics Girl, what did you do to your hair color? 😱
John Doe would you say its a violet catastrophe?
If you measure the electron and find where it is, then how do you know that it could have been anywhere, when you've measured its exact location? In other words how do you know there's a probability cloud anyway?
I'll probably just google it if no one responds lol
Look for Young's double slit experiment which showed the probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics.
The double slit experiment shows that one particle can interfere with itself. this is accomplished by being in two places at once (kinda). However if the electron is "observed" then the interference pattern disappears. See any of the many videos on the double slit experiment for more info :)
Thanks for the clarification
I'd have to think that the double slit answer is more like a energy splatter that causes the interference.
I love you, Physics Girl! Nice video. I would love to see more of QMs.
I can imagine the planning behind this awesome video. If she talked to someone else about the props, “Ok we’re gonna need LED lights a computer chip, and a cookie” “Why a cookie?” “Umm.... >.>”
everybody in the comment section talking about the hair color.. guys she just talked about the foundation of quantum mechanics like seriously the hair color is more important than that? I am not saying that it is bad but you can just appreciate it without bringing it up and focus on the active topic..
Parallax and this is why reality TV exists. Due to Morons.
BEST PHYSICS CHANNEL OF RUclips!
As a welder. I've come into contact with blackbody radiation for years now, and I never quite understood it.
I've had books explaining it to me, and stuff like that. And sure, in practice I knew what I could do. But now, seeing a video of 5 years ago. I kinda wished I simply looked for a video of the subject, 5 years ago.
Of course you had a video on it.
And it makes a lot more sense now.
Stay awesome!
i love how you said that, "the microscopic world just misbehaves"
the very small often misbehave when no one is looking.......(a nod to the double slit test)
_"Everything we call real is made of things that cannot be regarded as real."_ *-- Niels Bohr*
But they're hyper-real 😆
Why half of the messages are about her hair?
because they look great,
And the color of the hair lines up with the story, in case soem wievers are too mesmerised with her appealing looks , color of her hair links them back to the story.
Why not?
I've only read about 50 messages and I've seen 3 about her hair, maybe the rest are in a quantum state so I didn't see them?
because it's a new look for the lady. smart ladies can look good too, ya know!
@physicsgirl i just want to say your are a great inspiration to me im a senior in hs and im about to go to college for physics and i just want to say thank you so much for all you do
Glad I searched this out of the syllabus topic! At least I stumbled upon such a great YT channel
Learn something watching a fun, interesting video by an intelligent female. Then read comments, >50% about how she looks. Sigh.
thought so too...
What else did you expect? Welcome to youtube.
Welcome to the world
Edgard Perez-Palma That too. Good one!
jealous?
So if you teach science class as a series of facts to be memorized, you're doing it wrong. Teach the method of science, and your students will always be self correcting.
I taught the trees in my yard what happens when they are wrong. It's amazing how inspirational fire can be! Now I have self-trimming trees.
Thanks so much, brought a few things together. But you could mention Schrödinger's moggy and the Observer Effect re the electron.
Love the purple hair... nice enthusiastic and humorous presentation
This video elaboeates for the whole spectrum of the universe, and it is impresive.. And perhaps this explains the spectrum you're emanating Ms. Cowern, you're extatic for science,as do we all.. Keep up the great job of explaining science.
violett... hehe^^ violett hairs... hehe^^ katastrophe...
Nerdymon *violet *catastrophe
were're scientist not gramma nazis
Scientists can write.
We're not writers. The closest thing to being a physicist is a mathematician.
Actually not,the closest thing to being a physicist is a philosopher
Love the energy and jokes :-)
Your mentioning Rayleigh reminded me of the MIT folk song:
Tell me why the stars do shine;
Tell me why the ivy twines;
Tell me why the sky's so blue;
And I'll tell you just why I love you.
Nuclear fusion makes the stars shine;
Tropisms make the ivy twine;
Rayleigh Scattering makes the sky so blue;
And gonads and hormones are why I love you.
1:35 -- "Kind of funny ... that the brightest thing in our solar system [the sun] is the closest thing we know to a 'black body'" -- so cool! I'm still trying to wrap my mind around the physics concept of a black body, and the, apparently, many applications this idea has.
Fifty five hundred = 55100 :D Just a joke. I always say five thousands and five hundreds...
5,005 hundreds? so 500,500? At least that's one meaning that can take :P
LOL
When listening to an american, any time you hear ## hundred, just append two zeros. So Fifty Five Hundred = 5,500.
I know. But still it sounds strange to me (I am from Croatia, and format of numbers are different).
Don't worry, we think it sounds odd too. I've always said it as five thousand five hundred. I've also regularly heard people who say it as 55 hundred say 55 thousand (not necessarily the same 55 at the beginning, but for example...) then get themselves confused trying to figure between what they said and what they thought lol.
I think it's disingenuous to call quantum mechanics 'weird'. You're talking to the kids that are going to figure it out. Quantum mechanics isn't weird... it's the way the universe is. Only our understanding is 'weird'.
+32rq
Good point.
32rq yes your though is correct
Pfft, drop it.
Really great! Clear and funny as well. I'll show it to my students!
Holy COW, I didn't realize how much these guys started!
Why can't you people see that particles are just artifacts in the Quantum Fields :P I'm just sitting here and going -.- People are still sticking to an old interpretation of the particle: a building block of the universe. Even the probability-cloud view is a bit old, I think; it just seems too mystical. It doesn't explain the transition between the electron when measured and the cloud when not measured. The Quantum Field view does a sort of better job at this: the particle is not so different from the cloud, the cloud is just the collapse of dense waves in one of the Quantum Field.
But this is all from the top of my head. So, thoughts?
see now this, is a beautiful woman.
4:46 salute to the creative editor
Dianna, I freakin' love your video! I messed in mind-bending physics as an undergrad decades ago. In my spare time I still try to come closer to actually understanding the physics that underlies chemistry and everything else. So why do I love your vid? 1) Great explanations with engaging storytelling. 2) Dry humor. You never laugh out loud, but to an attentive listener, it is hilarious! 3) I can use your vid to show my daughter how to be awesome. Learn science -- it is fascinating and fun. You can be a storyteller, videographer, a teacher, and an active participant in the life of humans in this fascinating universe!